PreprintCommunicationVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
In-Silico Assessment of Chemical Disinfectants on Surface Proteins Unveiled Dissimilarity in Antiviral Efficacy and Suitability Towards Pathogenic Viruses
Zure, D.; Sung, M.-H.; Rahim, A.; Kuo, H.-W. In Silico Assessment of Chemical Disinfectants on Surface Proteins Unveiled Dissimilarity in Antiviral Efficacy and Suitability towards Pathogenic Viruses. Int. J. Mol. Sci.2024, 25, 6009.
Zure, D.; Sung, M.-H.; Rahim, A.; Kuo, H.-W. In Silico Assessment of Chemical Disinfectants on Surface Proteins Unveiled Dissimilarity in Antiviral Efficacy and Suitability towards Pathogenic Viruses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6009.
Zure, D.; Sung, M.-H.; Rahim, A.; Kuo, H.-W. In Silico Assessment of Chemical Disinfectants on Surface Proteins Unveiled Dissimilarity in Antiviral Efficacy and Suitability towards Pathogenic Viruses. Int. J. Mol. Sci.2024, 25, 6009.
Zure, D.; Sung, M.-H.; Rahim, A.; Kuo, H.-W. In Silico Assessment of Chemical Disinfectants on Surface Proteins Unveiled Dissimilarity in Antiviral Efficacy and Suitability towards Pathogenic Viruses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6009.
Abstract
Viral pathogens pose a substantial threat to public health and necessitate the development of effective remediation and antiviral strategies. This short communication aimed to investigate the antiviral efficacy of disinfectants on the surface proteins of human pathogenic viruses. Using in silico modeling, ligand binding energies (LBEs) of selected disinfectants were predicted and combined with their environmental impacts and costs through eco-pharmaco-economic analysis (EPEA). Results revealed the binding affinities of chemical disinfectants to viral proteins varied significantly (p
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Sustainable Science and Technology
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.