Preprint Review Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Contributions of Nature-Based Solutions to Reducing Peoples’ Vulnerabilities to Climate Change across the Rural Global South

Version 1 : Received: 17 October 2021 / Approved: 27 October 2021 / Online: 27 October 2021 (11:59:02 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 19 September 2022 / Approved: 20 September 2022 / Online: 20 September 2022 (12:35:06 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Stephen Woroniecki, Femke A. Spiegelenberg, Alexandre Chausson, Beth Turner, Isabel Key, Haseeb Md. Irfanullah & Nathalie Seddon (2022) Contributions of nature-based solutions to reducing people’s vulnerabilities to climate change across the rural Global South, Climate and Development, DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2022.2129954 Stephen Woroniecki, Femke A. Spiegelenberg, Alexandre Chausson, Beth Turner, Isabel Key, Haseeb Md. Irfanullah & Nathalie Seddon (2022) Contributions of nature-based solutions to reducing people’s vulnerabilities to climate change across the rural Global South, Climate and Development, DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2022.2129954

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) - working with and enhancing nature to address societal challenges - are increasingly being featured in climate change adaptation policy and plans. While there is growing evidence that NbS can reduce vulnerability to climate change impacts in general, there is a lack of understanding on the mechanisms through which this can be achieved, particularly in the Global South. To address this, we analyse 85 nature-based interventions in rural areas across the Global South, and factors mediating their effectiveness, based on a systematic map of peer-reviewed studies encompassing a wide diversity of ecosystems, climate impacts, and intervention types. We develop and apply an analytical framework of people’s social-ecological vulnerability to climate change, in terms of six pathways of vulnerability reduction: social and ecological exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Most cases (95%) report a reduction in vulnerability, primarily by lowering ecosystem sensitivity to climate impacts (73% of interventions), followed by reducing social sensitivity (52%), reducing ecological exposure (36%), increasing social adaptive capacity (31%), increasing ecological adaptive capacity (19%) and/or reducing social exposure (14%). An analysis of mediating factors shows that social dimensions are equally important as technical factors in NbS to achieving equitable and effective outcomes. Attention to the distinct social and ecological pathways through which vulnerability is reduced helps to harness the multiple benefits of working with nature in a warming world.

Keywords

Nature-based solutions; climate change adaptation; climate change vulnerability; social-ecological systems

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Atmospheric Science and Meteorology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 20 September 2022
Commenter: Stephen Woroniecki
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Latest version addresses reviewers comments and improves readability of the manuscript. New figures are included.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.