Preprint
Article
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices toward Hepatitis B Infection among Healthcare Students; A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Jordan.
Altmetrics
Downloads
339
Views
262
Comments
1
supplementary.docx (40.20KB )
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
26 December 2022
Posted:
03 January 2023
You are already at the latest version
Alerts
Abstract
The World Health Organization estimated that around 66 thousand HBV are caused by needlestick injuries annually. Healthcare students should be aware of HBV transmission route and preventive measures. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward HBV among Jordanian healthcare students and its associated factor. A cross-national study conducted from March to August. The participants were asked to complete the questionnaire. It had four sections: participants' sociodemographic, knowledge, attitudes, and practices about HBV. 2322 participants were enrolled, 67.9% were females, 26.4% were medical student, 35.9% were in the 3rd year. 40% of the participants held a high level of knowledge and attitude. 63.9% of participants had good practices toward HBV. Medical students in the last year of study, encountered HBV patients , had better knowledge. Male students from medicine college, encountered HBV patients and had extra HBV courses showed better attitude. High practice level was associated with being dentistry student, at 5th year, encountered HBV patient and extras HBV courses. This study demonstrated insufficient knowledge and attitudes toward HBV, the practices level toward HBV among healthcare students was promising. Subsequently, public health efforts should modify the knowledge and attitude gaps to reinforce awareness and minimizing risks of the infection.
Keywords:
Subject: Public Health and Healthcare - Public Health and Health Services
Introduction
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a worldwide public health problem that is considered as the most global risk factors for liver cancer. In 2019, The World Health Organization (WHO) reported around 296 million people were living with the virus globally [1]. The prevalence of HBV in the Jordanian general population has dropped from 9.9% in 1985 to 2.4% in 2016 after the introduction of HBV vaccination program to the newborn and high-risk group[2]. HBV transmitted by direct contact to infected body fluids, such as; blood, semen, mucous membranes, saliva, unsafe injections, and from an infected mother to her child at birth (perinatal transmission)[3].The CDC recommended HBV vaccination for healthcare workers as they are at risk for needle stick injury and vulnerable to contact with infected blood and body fluids[4]. A meta-analysis study found the incidence of needle stick injury is 43% among health workers[5]. Since HBV is a bloodborne pathogen, healthcare professionals should be immunized given their risk of occupational exposure, with the occurrence being about 2 to 10 times higher than in the general population [6]. Improving public understanding of the signs, symptoms, and causes of HBV infection are a critical strategy for preventing disease spread [2]. As a result, various studies have been conducted across the world to assess healthcare student’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) about HBV and its related variables[7,8,9,10]. Healthcare students in their clinical years should have sufficient awareness about HBV infection, the modes of transmission, the main symptoms, complications, and protective measures, as it would improve their health and direct them to be more sensitive and conscious toward themselves and their patients [11,12,13]. There is a need for up-to-date data about the level of awareness among healthcare students in Jordan for HBV infection. In this study, we aim to determine the KAP toward HBV infection among healthcare students and to assess the related factors.
Methodology
A cross-sectional study was conducted. We were able to reach responses of 2322 participants in our study during the period between march to august. Our target population was healthcare students who finished the infectious disease course (i.e., 3rd year to 6th year) of the following four colleges (medicine, nursing, dentistry, and pharmacy) all six universities in Jordan where collage of medicine is present: Jordan University of Science & Technology, Mut'ah University, University of Jordan, Hashemite University, Al-Balqa Applied University, and Yarmouk University. A participant-driven sampling approach was applied to recruit the participants from medical colleges (i.e., medicine, nursing, dentist, and pharmacy) in different universities. After getting the ethical approval, we reached the student representatives for each batch across the universities to facilitate distributing the questionnaire to eligible participants. The questionnaire was sent to all students through messages and posted in each batch's main official social media groups. These groups are private groups under the supervision of the student representative of the concerned batch.
Questionnaire administration
An invitation letter was sent to the students who are eligible to participate in the study. The questionnaire was distributed using an online Google Form survey link. After signing the informed consent form, students were asked to complete the questionnaire. It was explicitly mentioned that participation is entirely voluntary and that the individual may quit at any moment without penalty. It was also stated that there would be no direct advantages of participating other than sharing current knowledge. No personal identities were gathered, and participants were requested to provide the necessary information to achieve correct findings.
Measurement tool
A structured online-based Arabic/English self-administered questionnaire based on a previously validated instrument was adopted [14,15]. The Arabic version was done by two researchers and edited after pilot testing on 30 medical students . It was divided into four sections: demographics of participants, knowledge section consisting of (43) questions, attitude sections with (8) questions, and practices sections with (3) questions, the questionnaire is shown in supplementary file 1. Before distributing and implementing the questionnaire, a pilot test was conducted to make sure the questions were understandable and clear.
Ethical considerations
The study protocol was developed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration's ethical standards, and it was evaluated and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Jordan in Amman, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on (1/25/2022) (reference number: 1/2022/2506) in meeting No.2022/1. Before completing the questionnaire, all participants provided written informed consent. The data was gathered and processed confidentially before being saved on a personal computer which only the authors can access.
Statistical analysis
Data were entered into Microsoft Excel (2016) and then imported into IBM SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA) for analysis. For each quantitative and categorical variable, descriptive statistics were computed and expressed as either frequency and percentage or mean and standard deviation (S.D.). Associations between demographic variables, knowledge, attitudes, and practice were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Significantly associated variables were included in multivariate regression analysis and controlled for potential confounders to assess the independent effect of each variable. Each true answer received one point. A participant's score was considered good if they successfully answered more than 70% of the questions in each KAP section. Participants' scores were considered low if they successfully answered fewer than 70% of the questions in each section. A p-value of α < 0.05 and a Confidence Interval of 95% were set to determine the statistical significance of the reported results.
Results
Demographics of survey participants
The demographic characteristics of the study sample are presented in Table 1.
A total of 2322 students responded to the questionnaire. 67.9% (n = 1577) were female, and 32.1% (n=745) were male. The mean age of participants was (22.2±1.7). 26.4% (n=612) of the participants were medical students, 25% (n=581) were nursing students, 22.9% (n=532) were pharmacy students, and 25.7% (n=597) were dental students. 35.9% (n=833) were 3rd year, 23.3% (n=541) were 4th year, 14% (n=324) were 5th year and 26.9% (n=624) were 6th year or graduates. Only 10.8% (n=250) took extra courses (besides their university lectures) about HBV. 1.2% (n=29) were infected with HBV, 3.7% (n=86) have a family member infected with HBV, and 32.3% (n=749) have encountered patients with HBV infection.
Knowledge about Hepatitis B Virus and its associated factors
The summary of the participants' understanding of HBV is shown in (Table 2). About 86.3% did not know the estimated prevalence of HBV in Jordan. Only 14.3% knew newborns infected with HBV were the highest risk group, and 15.5% knew that most HBV patients in Jordan got infected through mother-to-child transmission at birth. 11.8% knew about the high risks of premature death without monitoring and treatment. About two-third (69.8%) of the participants knew that HBV could cause liver cirrhosis, liver failure, liver cancer, or premature death.
Most participants claimed that HBV can be transmitted through blood transfusion (94.8%), mother-to-child at birth (80.5%), unprotected sex (82.6%), but not by sneezing or coughing (60.2%), or handshaking (75.8%). However, (58.9%) still wrongly believed that HBV could be transmitted through sharing utensils and food with an HBV-infected person. Regarding HBV vaccination, (86.6%) of the participants recognized that hepatitis B vaccination could prevent HBV infection. (23.6%) knew newborn vaccination at birth could prevent mother-to-child transmission. Few participants (12.1%) knew that giving the first dose of the hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) within 12 h of birth and completing the vaccine doses are the most effective way to protect infants born from HBsAg-positive mothers. Knowledge about needle stick injury was assessed; about half (48.4%) of the participants knew they should dispose the used needles and syringes into a sharp-proof container immediately without recapping. In addition, (32.9%) knew they should not recap the needle with two hands to prevent needle stick injury. The participant's knowledge about hepatitis B diagnosis and management was inadequate. Only (6.1%) knew that most patients with HBV are often asymptomatic, and (41.8%) knew that the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test is the test used to confirm HBV infection. (37.8%) knew that the hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) test is used to identify immunity to hepatitis B. (6%) knew that infants, who born to HBsAg-positive mothers, should be evaluated for HBsAg after one year of delivery. More than half of the participants knew HBV screening is recommended for pregnant women, HIV patients, men who have sex with men, and family members of the infected patients.About (56.5%) were aware that there is no cure for HBV, but there are effective medications to manage and control the disease, (75.5%) wrongly believed that all HBV patients need to receive antiviral treatment and (48.2%) were unaware that treatment of HBV with nucleotide or nucleoside analogs (NAS) is long-term and potentially lifelong.
Gender, taking extra HBV courses, being infected with HBV and having a family history of HBV were not associated with knowledge level, so they were not included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. See Table 5
On multivariate logistic regression analysis, significant associations were found between the level of knowledge and the following variables: age ( OR = 1.007, CI = 0.934-1.087, p <0.852), college: medicine (OR= 2.174, CI = 1.706-2.77, p <0.000; ref: Pharmacy), nursing (OR = 1.147, CI = 0.884-1.489, p <0.301; ref: Pharmacy), Dentistry (OR = 0.681, CI = 0.531-0.873, p <0.000; ref: Pharmacy), studying year: 4th year (OR = 1.322, CI = 1.019-1.714, p <0.035; ref: 3rd year), 5th year (OR = 2.764, CI = 1.984-3.850, p <0.00; ref: 3rd year), 6th year (OR = 2.974, CI = 2.096-4.218, p <0.00; ref: 3rd year) and if they encountered a HBV patient (OR = 1.642, CI = 1.350-1.998, p <0.00). See Table 6
Attitude toward Hepatitis B virus and its associated factors
The majority of participants (82.3%) believed that the HBV vaccine was safe, (55.5%) thought that it was necessary to vaccinate newborns at birth. While (48.1%) were assured in counseling patients on HBV prevention. In addition, (58.9%) and (63.4%) were confident in ordering laboratory tests to diagnose HBV and to monitor patients with HBV, respectively. However, (29.5%) were confident in prescribing medications to treat HBV patients. Hepatitis B stigma among the study participants is high in which, (68.5%) expressed concerns about casual contact or working in the same office and (77%) expressed concerns about eating or sharing food with a person with HBV (Table 3). The variables related to HBV infection history were not included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis since they were not associated with attitude. Significant associations were found between attitude and the following variables: age ( OR=1.051, CI=0.976-1.133, p <0.189), gender (male: OR= 1.322, CI= 1.100-1.590, p= 0.003; ref: female), college: Medicine (OR= 1.955, CI= 1.544-2.476, p <0.000; ref: pharmacy), nursing (OR= 1.664, CI= 1.249-2.140, p <0.000; ref: pharmacy), dentistry (OR= 0.876, CI= 0.687-1.113, p <0.274; ref: pharmacy), studying year: 4th year (OR= 1.151, CI= 0.899-1.472, p <0.264; ref: 3rd year), 5th year (OR= 1.223, CI= 0.884-1.692, p <0.225; ref: 3rd year), 6th year (OR= 1.146, CI= 0.814-1.613, p <0.435; ref: 3rd year), HBV patient encounter (OR= 1.440, CI= 1.189-1.746, p <0.00) and if they have taken extra HBV courses (OR= 1.371, CI= 1.040-1.807, p <0.025).
Practices toward Hepatitis B virus and its associated factors
(45.1% ) of the participants sought to receive hepatitis B testing and (70.7%) sought to receive the hepatitis B vaccine before starting clinical training at the hospitals. About (61.6%) reported consistently wearing gloves when administering injections or performing medical procedures at hospitals. (Table 4) The variables related to HBV infection history were not included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis since they were not associated with practices. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, significant associations were found between the level of practice and the following variables : age ( OR=1.046, CI=0.960-1.140, p <0.300), gender (male: OR= 1.197, CI= 0.974-1.470, p=<0.087; ref: female), college: medicine (OR= 1.656, CI= 1.301-2.109, p <0.000; ref: pharmacy), nursing (OR= 3.977, CI= 3.052-5.183, p <0.000; ref: pharmacy), dentistry (OR= 7.698, CI= 5.876-10.087, p <0.000; ref: pharmacy), studying year: 4th year (OR= 1.011, CI= 0.776-1.317, p <0.934; ref: 3rd year), 5th year (OR= 1.943, CI= 1.354-2.787, p <0.00; ref: 3rd year), 6th year (OR= 1.778, CI= 1.206-2.620, p <0.004; ref: 3rd year), HBV patient encounter (OR= 2.031, CI= 1.634-2.524, p <0.00) and if they have taken extra HBV courses (OR= 1.437, CI= 1.042-1.981, p <0.027).
Correlation between KAP
Spearman rank correlation revealed a significant weak to moderate positive linear correlations between knowledge-attitude (r = 0.249, p < 0.00), knowledge-practice (r = 0.127, p < 0.00), and attitude-practice (r = 0.156, p < 0.00). This result reaffirms the relationship between knowledge, attitude, and practice toward HBV infection, as shown in Table 7.
Discussion
Promoting awareness is a cornerstone of any strategy to control and prevent infectious diseases. In this cross-national study, we aimed to assess the level of KAP among healthcare students toward HBV infection in Jordan. Around 2300 healthcare students in their clinical years completed the questionnaire. This study revealed that the overall knowledge regarding HBV infection, prevalence, sequelae, diagnosis, transmission, preventive measures, and treatment was low. In our study, around forty percent of the healthcare students had high level of knowledge. This result is similar to a study conducted in India [7]. However other studies showed high level of knowledge among healthcare student [8,9]. We have noticed a significant knowledge gap regarding HBV prevalence, sequelae, diagnosis, preventive measures, testing, and interpretation of hepatitis B test results. Approximately less than (15%) of the healthcare student were aware of the HBV prevalence, the main route of transmission of HBV infection and whom are at higher risk of getting the infection. Only (6.1%) were aware that most HBV patients are without symptoms, about (42%) knew that HBsAg is used for diagnosis of HBV infection, and (56.5%) were aware that there is no cure but effective medications to manage the disease as observed in other studies [8,10]. This fact may be attributed to an inadequate virology curriculum and insufficient clinical training to interpret test results. Scientific knowledge about HBV is essential for healthcare students to minimize the risk of viral transmission during their clinical training. In our study, the level of knowledge about HBV infection was higher in those who studied medicine or had high education level. In addition, healthcare students who encountered patients with HBV infection are more knowledgeable than who did not. The poor knowledge in our study is alarming, and efforts should be made to explore the reasons behind such poor knowledge and understand the causes behind this fact.
Generally, the attitudes and beliefs toward HBV infection among healthcare students in Jordan were poor, which is in line with a study conducted in Ghana and Cameroon [16,17]. Only 42% of the healthcare students had good attitudes, a very low percentage in comparison to other studies [7,18]. The stigma of HBV infection is still a significant issue that should be targeted even among healthcare students. About 23% of students had concerns about sharing food or utensils with patients having HBV. 31.5% had concerns about contacting or working with individuals infected with HBV. This was similar to another study done in Jordan among nursing students who were afraid of treating people with hepatitis as they thought they might be at risk and that people infected with hepatitis should be isolated in a special room.[19] On the other hand, more than half (56.1%) of Saudi dentists were willing to achieve continuity of care for HBsAg-positive patients.[10] This stigma increases the psychological and social burden on patients already suffering from HBV and its medical consequences which poses significant challenges. We observed that female gender, being in a medical college, high level of education, taking extra courses about HBV infection and HBV patient encounter were good predictors for having better attitude. Despite the low level of both knowledge and attitudes, healthcare students had satisfactory level of good practices toward HBV infection. This is similar to other studies conducted in Vietnam and Ghana [14,20]. Furthermore, our results show that (45.1%) of healthcare students reported having HBV test before starting clinical training at hospitals while (70.7%) of them reported taking HBV vaccine, similar to another study done in Jordan among students in dental practices[21]. In addition, the majority (82.3%) of healthcare students believed that the HBV vaccine is safe; this finding is in line with other studies done in Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia, and in contrast to an Italian study done among dentists [8,10,22] To achieve universal hepatitis B vaccine coverage for all healthcare students, schools must implement programs to evaluate students' immunity status and provide vaccines to unvaccinated individuals. Only (32.9%) know that recapping needles is a wrong practice and can cause needle stick injury. This explains the high rates of needle stick injury among nursing staff in Jordan, as found in a previous study.[19] These findings emphasize the need for infection control training to improve injection safety practices among students. In our study, we have noticed the more clinical years spent as trainees in hospitals, the higher level of knowledge, attitude, and practices achieved, as well as HBV patients encounter.
Strengths and limitations
To the best of our knowledge, this study surveyed the biggest sample of healthcare students from Jordan's universities of different colleges, ensuring a considerable degree of representation and facilitating the extraction of comprehensive data. The study has limitations, such as that data is based on participant self-reporting and cannot be checked. Similarly, estimates of testing and vaccination coverage, as well as HBsAg seroprevalence, relied only on participant response. Because this is a cross-sectional study, establishing a cause-and-effect relationship is challenging. In addition, only quantitative measures and online convenience sampling were used to assess awareness, which are the inevitable limitations.
Conclusion
The findings of this study revealed unsatisfactory knowledge and attitude scores toward HBV infection. However, the level of practice is satisfactory among healthcare students. Students who were from the college of medicine or had higher education levels or encountered a patient with HBV infection showed to have better knowledge. While male students or students from the medicine college who encountered patients with HBV infection or took extra courses about HBV showed high level of attitude. In terms of practices, a high level of practice was shown with students from the college of dentistry, encountering patients with HBV infection and taking extra courses about HBV infection. Finally, it is necessary to implement enlightenment programs to improve healthcare students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices, particularly in weak areas.
References
- Organization, W.H. Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021.
- Nusair, M.; Rayyan, Y.; Hammoudeh, W.; Al-Khatib, M.A.; Mansour, E.; Snehanshu, S.; Bassil, N.; Kozma, S.; Ghazzawi, I.A. Hepatitis B care pathway in Jordan: current situation, gaps and recommended actions. J Virus Erad 2020, 6, 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Margolis, H.; Alter, M.; Hadler, S. Viral infections of humans: epidemiology and control. 1997.
- Sarah Schillie, C.V., Arthur Reingold, Aaron Harris,Penina Haber,John W. Ward,Noele P. Nelson, MD. Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; 2018. [CrossRef]
- Hosseinipalangi, Z.; Golmohammadi, Z.; Ghashghaee, A.; Ahmadi, N.; Hosseinifard, H.; Mejareh, Z.N.; Dehnad, A.; Aghalou, S.; Jafarjalal, E.; Aryankhesal, A.; et al. Global, regional and national incidence and causes of needlestick injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. East Mediterr Health J 2022, 28, 233-241. [CrossRef]
- Hadler, S.C. Hepatitis B virus infection and health care workers. Vaccine 1990, 8 Suppl, S24-28; discussion S41-23. [CrossRef]
- Chhabra, D.; Mishra, S.; Gawande, K.; Sharma, A.; Kishore, S.; Bhadoria, A.S. Knowledge, attitude, and practice study on hepatitis B among medical and nursing undergraduate students of an apex healthcare institute at Uttarakhand foothills: A descriptive analysis. J Family Med Prim Care 2019, 8, 2354-2360. [CrossRef]
- Abdela, A.; Woldu, B.; Haile, K.; Mathewos, B.; Deressa, T. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices toward prevention of hepatitis B virus infection among students of medicine and health sciences in Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes 2016, 9, 410. [CrossRef]
- Noubiap, J.J.; Nansseu, J.R.; Kengne, K.K.; Tchokfe Ndoula, S.; Agyingi, L.A. Occupational exposure to blood, hepatitis B vaccine knowledge and uptake among medical students in Cameroon. BMC medical education 2013, 13, 148. [CrossRef]
- Al-Hazmi, A.H. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of dentists concerning the occupational risks of hepatitis B virus in Al Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia. Niger J Clin Pract 2015, 18, 276-281. [CrossRef]
- Sannathimmappa, M.B.; Nambiar, V.; Arvindakshan, R. Hepatitis B: Knowledge and awareness among preclinical year medical students. Avicenna J Med 2019, 9, 43-47. [CrossRef]
- Prodanovska-Stojcevska, V.; Isjanovska, R.; Popova-Ramova, E. Knowledge of HCV infection among nursing students of the Medical College of Bitola. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2010, 61, 197-201. [CrossRef]
- Scully, C.; Bakaeen, G.; Levers, H. Hepatitis B vaccination and infection control practices of Jordanian clinical dental students. J Oral Pathol Med 1991, 20, 350-351. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.L.; Pham, T.T.H.; So, S.; Hoang, T.H.V.; Nguyen, T.T.U.; Ngo, T.B.; Nguyen, M.P.; Thai, Q.H.; Nguyen, N.K.; Le Ho, T.Q.A.; et al. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices toward Hepatitis B Virus Infection among Students of Medicine in Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021, 18. [CrossRef]
- Hang Pham, T.T.; Le, T.X.; Nguyen, D.T.; Luu, C.M.; Truong, B.D.; Tran, P.D.; Toy, M.; Bozkurt, S.; So, S. Knowledge, attitudes and medical practice regarding hepatitis B prevention and management among healthcare workers in Northern Vietnam. PLoS One 2019, 14, e0223733. [CrossRef]
- Afihene, M.Y.; Duduyemi, B.M. Knowledge, attitude and practices concerning Hepatitis B infection, among healthcare workers in Bantama, Ghana: a cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health 2015, 2, 244-253. [CrossRef]
- Akazong, W.E.; Tume, C.; Njouom, R.; Ayong, L.; Fondoh, V.; Kuiate, J.R. Knowledge, attitude and prevalence of hepatitis B virus among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional, hospital-based study in Bamenda Health District, NWR, Cameroon. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e031075. [CrossRef]
- Khan, N.; Ahmed, S.M.; Khalid, M.M.; Siddiqui, S.H.; Merchant, A.A. Effect of gender and age on the knowledge, attitude and practice regarding hepatitis B and C and vaccination status of hepatitis B among medical students of Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2010, 60, 450-455.
- Wahsheh, M.A.; Hassan, Z.M.; Hassan Al-Wahsh, F.M. Hepatitis Knowledge and Attitudes among Jordanian Nursing Students. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education 2011, 49, 9-15. [CrossRef]
- Balegha, A.N.; Yidana, A.; Abiiro, G.A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of hepatitis B infection prevention among nursing students in the Upper West Region of Ghana: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2021, 16, e0258757. [CrossRef]
- Bakri, I.; Al-Omari, W.; Ananzeh, A.; Alshatrat, S. Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Cross Infection Control Among Students of Dentistry, Dental Hygiene, and Dental Technology in Jordan. The Open Dentistry Journal 2021, 15, 617-625. [CrossRef]
- Resende, V.L.S.; Abreu, M.H.G.; Paiva, S.M.; Teixeira, R.; Pordeus, I.A. Concerns regarding hepatitis B vaccination and post-vaccination test among Brazilian dentists. Virology Journal 2010, 7, 154. [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Demographics of survey participants (n = 2322).
| Respondents’ Demographics | n/ Mean | %/ SD | |
| Age | 22.2 | (±1.7) | |
| Gender: | Male | 745 | 32.1% |
| Female | 1577 | 67.9% | |
| College: | Medicine | 612 | 26.4% |
| Nursing | 581 | 25.0% | |
| Pharmacy | 532 | 22.9% | |
| Dentistry | 597 | 25.7% | |
| Studying year: | 3rd year | 833 | 35.9% |
| 4th year | 541 | 23.3% | |
| 5th year | 324 | 14% | |
| 6th year | 624 | 26.9% | |
| Extra courses about HBV: | Yes | 250 | 10.8% |
| No | 2072 | 89.2% | |
| History of HBV infection: | Yes | 29 | 1.2% |
| No | 2293 | 98.8% | |
| Family member infected with HBV: | Yes | 86 | 3.7% |
| No | 2236 | 96.3% | |
| Encountered HBV patient: | Yes | 749 | 32.3% |
| No | 1573 | 67.7% | |
Table 2.
Knowledge about HBV among health care students in Jordan (n = 2322).
| Questions | Correct answers | ||
| n | % | ||
| Prevalence and Sequelae | |||
| 1. What percentage of the Jordanian population has chronic hepatitis B (HBV)? | 317 | 13.7% | |
| 2. How did most people who have HBV in Jordan get infected? | 360 | 15.5% | |
| 3. Which age group is most likely to develop HBV after the initial infection? | 333 | 14.3% | |
| 4.What are the consequences of chronic hepatitis B? | 1620 | 69.8% | |
| 47. Without proper monitoring and treatment, what is the chance a patient would die of HBV complications? | 275 | 11.8% | |
| Transmission Routes | |||
| 5. Can hepatitis B be transmitted through handshake? | 1761 | 75.8% | |
| 6. Can hepatitis B be transmitted through unprotected sex? | 1919 | 82.6% | |
| 7. Can hepatitis B be transmitted through blood transfusion? | 2202 | 94.8% | |
| 8. Can hepatitis B be transmitted through sneezing or coughing? | 1397 | 60.2% | |
| 9. Can hepatitis B be transmitted through from mother to child at birth? | 1869 | 80.5% | |
| 10. Can hepatitis B be transmitted through sharing food or utensils? | 955 | 41.1% | |
| Prevention Measures | |||
| 11. Can cleaning and cooking food thoroughly prevent HBV transmission? | 833 | 35.9% | |
| 12. Can the hepatitis B vaccine prevent HBV transmission? | 2012 | 86.6% | |
| 13. Can HBV transmission be prevented by not reusing or sharing needles/syringes? | 2165 | 93.2% | |
| 14. Can HBV transmission be prevented by avoid sharing food/utensils or eating with a person with chronic HBV? | 777 | 33.5% | |
| 15. Can using a condom prevent HBV transmission? | 1791 | 77.1% | |
| 16.What is the most effective preventive measure for infants born to mothers with chronic HBsAg? | 653 | 28.1% | |
| 18. Who needs the hepatitis B vaccine? | 1761 | 75.8% | |
| 21. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission | 548 | 23.6% | |
| 20. The first dose of hepatitis B vaccine for baby | 280 | 12.1% | |
| 27. Is it necessary to have sharp-proof containers at clinics for disposing of needles and sharp objects? | 1467 | 63.2% | |
| What would you do to prevent needle-stick injury? | |||
| 24. Wash hands with soap or disinfectant after each clinical procedure? | 292 | 12.6% | |
| 25. Recap needle with two hands after use and discard immediately in a sharp-proof container | 763 | 32.9% | |
| 26. Do not recap needle and discard immediately in a sharp-proof container | 1124 | 48.4% | |
| Diagnosis and Treatment | |||
| 35. What is the symptom most patients with chronic hepatitis B present with? | 142 | 6.1% | |
| 33. Serum HBsAg test for identification of patients infected with hepatitis B virus | 971 | 41.8% | |
| 34. What test should be used to identify immunity against the hepatitis B virus? | 877 | 37.8% | |
| 50.When should infants born to mothers with HBV be evaluated for HBsAg status? | 140 | 6% | |
| Who should be tested for hepatitis B? | |||
| 29. Pregnant women should be tested for hepatitis B | 1541 | 66.4% | |
| 30. HIV-infected people should be tested for hepatitis B | 1934 | 83.3% | |
| 31. Men who have sex with men (MSM) should be tested for hepatitis B | 1581 | 68.1% | |
| 32. Family members of those who have hepatitis B should be tested for hepatitis B | 1969 | 84.8% | |
| Treatment | |||
| 36. What are the criteria for indicating treatment in patients with HBV? | 787 | 33.9% | |
| 37. There is no cure, but there are effective medications to manage and control the disease? | 1312 | 56.5% | |
| What are the treatment goals for HBV patients? | |||
| 38. Inhibit the replication of the hepatitis B virus | 1969 | 84.8% | |
| 39. Prevent disease progression of disease, particularly liver cirrhosis and liver cancer | 2092 | 90.1% | |
| 40. Prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) | 2036 | 87.7% | |
| 41. Prevent flare of hepatitis B | 2022 | 87.1% | |
| 42. Is it true that (NAs) are a recommended first-line treatment for HBV? | 1092 | 47.0% | |
| 43. Is treatment of HBV with NAs long term, possibly even lifetime? | 1120 | 48.2% | |
| 44. Do patients need to strictly adhere to the treatment of HBV? | 1724 | 74.2% | |
| 45. Do you think that all patients with chronic HBV need to be treated immediately? | 570 | 24.5% | |
| 46. Should all HBV patients be monitored and tested regardless of treatment status? | 1486 | 64% | |
Abbreviations: HBV: hepatitis B virus; MSM: men who have sex with men; MTCT: mother-to-child transmission; NAs: Nucleotide Analogs.
Table 5.
Association between demographic characteristics of students and knowledge, attitude, and practices toward HBV (n = 2322).
Table 5.
Association between demographic characteristics of students and knowledge, attitude, and practices toward HBV (n = 2322).
| Level of knowledge | Level of attitude | Level of practice | |||||||||
| Low (1401) |
High (921) |
P-value | Low (1355) |
High (967) |
P-value | Bad (838) |
Good (1484) |
P-value | |||
| Age: | 21.9(±) | 22.6(±) | .000 | 22.1(±) | 22.3(±) | .000 | 21.9(±) | 22.4(±) | .000 | ||
| Gender: | Male | 470 | 275 | .063 | 387 | 358 | .000 | 234 | 511 | .001 | |
| Female | 931 | 646 | 968 | 609 | 604 | 973 | |||||
| College: | Medicine | 278 | 334 | .000 | 298 | 314 | .000 | 287 | 325 | .000 | |
| Nursing | 385 | 196 | 305 | 276 | 168 | 413 | |||||
| Pharmacy | 315 | 217 | 347 | 185 | 294 | 238 | |||||
| Dentistry | 423 | 174 | 405 | 192 | 89 | 508 | |||||
| Studying year: | 3rd year | 608 | 225 | .000 | 518 | 315 | .004 | 343 | 490 | .000 | |
| 4th year | 353 | 188 | 303 | 238 | 216 | 325 | |||||
| 5th year | 169 | 155 | 199 | 125 | 108 | 216 | |||||
| 6th year | 271 | 353 | 335 | 289 | 171 | 453 | |||||
| Extra courses about HBV: | Yes | 148 | 102 | .698 | 118 | 132 | .000 | 67 | 183 | .001 | |
| No | 1253 | 819 | 1237 | 835 | 771 | 1301 | |||||
| History of HBV infection: | Yes | 17 | 12 | .849 | 12 | 17 | .062 | 9 | 20 | .568 | |
| No | 1384 | 909 | 1343 | 950 | 829 | 1464 | |||||
| Family member infected with HBV: | Yes | 50 | 36 | .671 | 47 | 39 | .478 | 37 | 49 | .172 | |
| No | 1351 | 885 | 1308 | 928 | 801 | 1435 | |||||
| Encountered HBV patient: | Yes | 364 | 385 | .000 | 369 | 380 | .000 | 192 | 557 | .000 | |
| No | 1037 | 536 | 986 | 587 | 646 | 927 | |||||
Table 6.
logistic regression analysis establishing the associations between attitude and practice among the general population in Jordan.
Table 6.
logistic regression analysis establishing the associations between attitude and practice among the general population in Jordan.
| Covariates | Knowledge | Attitude | Practice | ||||||||||
| OR | CI | P-value | OR | CI | P-value | OR | CI | P-value | |||||
| Age: | 1.007 | 0.934-1.087 | 0.852 | 1.051 | 0.976-1.133 | 0.189 | 1.046 | 0.960-1.140 | 0.300 | ||||
| Gender: | NA | ||||||||||||
| Male | 1.322 | 1.100-1.590 | 0.003 | 1.197 | 0.974-1.470 | 0.087 | |||||||
| Female | Reference | Reference | |||||||||||
| College: | |||||||||||||
| Pharmacy | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||||||
| Medicine | 2.174 | 1.706-2.77 | 0.000 | 1.955 | 1.544-2.476 | 0.000 | 1.656 | 1.301-2.109 | 0.000 | ||||
| Nursing | 1.147 | 0.884-1.489 | 0.301 | 1.664 | 1.249-2.140 | 0.000 | 3.977 | 3.052-5.183 | 0.000 | ||||
| Dentistry | 0.681 | 0.531-0.873 | 0.000 | 0.876 | 0.687-1.113 | 0.274 | 7.698 | 5.876-10.087 | 0.000 | ||||
| Studying year: | |||||||||||||
| 3rd year | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||||||
| 4th year | 1.322 | 1.019-1.714 | 0.035 | 1.151 | 0.899-1.472 | 0.264 | 1.011 | 0.776-1.317 | 0.934 | ||||
| 5th year | 2.764 | 1.984-3.850 | 0.000 | 1.223 | 0.884-1.692 | 0.225 | 1.943 | 1.354-2.787 | 0.000 | ||||
| 6th year | 2.974 | 2.096-4.218 | 0.000 | 1.146 | 0.814-1.613 | 0.435 | 1.778 | 1.206-2.620 | 0.004 | ||||
| Encountered HBV patient: | |||||||||||||
| Yes | 1.642 | 1.350-1.998 | 0.000 | 1.440 | 1.189-1.746 | 0.000 | 2.031 | 1.634-2.524 | 0.000 | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||||||
| Extra courses about HBV: | NA | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 1.371 | 1.040-1.807 | 0.025 | 1.437 | 1.042-1.981 | 0.027 | |||||||
| No | Reference | Reference | |||||||||||
Table 3.
Attitude toward HBV (n = 2322).
| Questions | Answered yes | |
| n | % | |
| 17. Are you confident in counseling patients about prevention of HBV? | 1118 | 48.1% |
| 19. Do you think that the hepatitis B vaccine is safe? | 1912 | 82.3% |
| 54. Do you feel confident in ordering HBV Vaccination for newborns? | 1289 | 55.5% |
| 48. Are you confident in ordering laboratory tests to monitor HBV patients? | 1473 | 63.4% |
| 49. Are you confident in prescribing treatment for a patient with chronic hepatitis B? | 684 | 29.5% |
| 51. Are you confident in ordering diagnosis tests for patients with chronic HBV? | 1367 | 58.9% |
| 52. Would you have any concerns having casual contact or working together with a chronic HBV patient in the same office? | 731 | 31.5% |
| 53. Would you have any concerns sharing food or utensils with a HBV? | 535 | 23% |
Table 4.
HBV Preventive Practices (n = 2322 ).
| Questions | Answered yes | |
| n | % | |
| 22. Did you get the hepatitis B vaccine before entering practicum at teaching hospitals? | 1642 | 70.7% |
| 23. Did you get tested for HBV before entering practicum at teaching hospitals? | 1047 | 45.1% |
| 28. Do you consistently wear gloves when administrating injections or performing medical procedures to patients? | 1430 | 61.6% |
Table 7.
Correlation between knowledge, attitude, and practices scores.
| Variable | Correlation coefficient | P-value* |
| Knowledge-attitude | .249 | .000 |
| Knowledge-practice | .127 | .000 |
| Attitude-practice | .156 | .000 |
*Correlation significant at .01 level (2-tailed).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated