Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Developing the Meaning of Life Model: Introduction of the Main Components of the Model Structure

Altmetrics

Downloads

178

Views

88

Comments

0

Submitted:

22 January 2023

Posted:

30 January 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The debate about the meaning of life in the literature has been around for a while and portraits a fundamental human need to find a personal path of existence. The meaning of life phenomenon purpose lies in its impact on the psychological wellbeing. Knowing your purpose in life can make it more structured and in balance, therefore more meaningful and comprehensible. However, in the existing body of the academic literature meaning of life is discussed more from the philosophic perspective rather than a practical area, which is not helping to solve the global issues of increasing mental health problems. When social and emotional wellbeing is being affected, it is urgent to apply a practical approach to effectively overcome these states. Introduction of a new, holistic meaning of life model is an attempt to offer a practical solution for society to maintain their mental health through awareness of their life’s purpose. Previously in the pilot study (Dombrovskis, 2017) in a sample group of 100 citizens of Latvia who self-reported being in a crisis situation at the given moment, using qualitive analysis the first component for the model structure was identified – antecedent. In our research antecedent is defined as something that triggers certain action, so in crisis situation person can regain a structure and stability in life. We found 8 different antecedents that trigger behavior of those affected by crisis: achievements; power; success; development; freedom; uniqueness; interesting life and fleeing. To continue to explore other components for our model in the setting of Latvia, this study aims to investigate the demographic and personality related variables that may serve as antecedents and as such become one of component in our model structure. The study used a sample of residents of Latvia representing the total population of 1,110 respondents (633 women, 57%, and 477 men, 43%) who have completed the self-assessment questionnaire Meaning of life scale (MOLS) (online and frontally) designed by the authors on their satisfaction with different factors regarding the meaning of life. Average age of respondents (M=33.88; SD=8,527) varied from 18 to 67. The exploratory and confirmatory analysis confirms the data regarding existence of totally 16 factors: 8 antecedents identified in the pilot study and 8 new antecedents identified in the present study - family relations; level of income; relations with friends/acquaintances; state of health; organization of free time; career growth (achievements); sexual life quality and quality of education. Findings confirm a model’s structure to be complex phenomenon consisting of various components. However, findings suggest that more research should be done to fill the following gaps: 1) identify actions, which are triggered by 16 antecedents; 2) figure out F1, F2 and F3 factor role in the model structure.
Keywords: 
Subject: Social Sciences  -   Psychology

1. Introduction

In spite of 120 years of psychological science, and almost 25 years of positive psychology existence, yet the only practical thing creating an actionable methodology for finding or expanding meaning of life can be find in the concept of logotherapy formulated by Viktor Emil Frankl (Marshall & Marshall, 2012). Nevertheless, logotherapy using the method of logo analysis (Schulenberg, Nassif & Rogina, 2008) is not a universal method that deals with the meaning of human life. The reasons for this are the low availability of this method - not all groups of the population can afford long-term therapy and treatments. Failure to work with personal meaning may lead to a state of existential crisis (Längle, 2008), which can result in a mental health problem (Glaw, Hazelton, Kable, & Inder, 2020). The problems of mental health are one of the main goals and areas of work in human development. Inability to provide an efficient help in this area leaves great consequences on humanity: a colossal waste of money (billions of euros per year); the level of depression is one of the main causes of disability; suicide is the second leading cause of death among young people aged 15-29; people with severe mental illnesses die prematurely - two decades earlier (World Health Organization, 2019). Therefore, it is necessary to understand at what point a person loses meaning, purpose and direction in life (Gao & McLellan, 2018), and when one begins to execute undesirable behavior (Leath, 1999). One of the ways how we can start to help these people is understanding the antecedents of the crisis. In the 1960s with the beginning of applied behavior analysis, nowadays well-known Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (A-B-C) analysis was introduced to the public (Bijou, Peterson & Ault, 1968). Within this concept, we want to understand specific effects of antecedents on finding or losing meaning of life. Previously in the pilot study (Dombrovskis, 2017) it was determined that antecedents are playing a significant role in the journey of seeking of personal meaning of life. However, it is not clear yet, how many and which antecedents affect one’s meaning of life.
Idea of the pilot study suggests that meaning of life allows to reach a certain level in which a person’s life becomes consistent - clear, manageable and meaningful. Consistency increases self-efficacy, flexibility, optimism, self-confidence or understanding (Grevenstein, Aguilar-Raab & Bluemke, 2018). In order to help people, achieve a consistency in life even when in crisis, it is necessary by specialists to offer a practical solution which would pinpoint exact steps what to do. We believe that the solution would be action-based model which allows for every average person to find and pursuit their personal meaning of life.
The subject of research includes factors, which expands the previously identified list of antecedents. The aim of this study was to confirm or dismiss if current results are consistent with previous pilot study.

2. Theory

Meaning of Life

A marker of a state of psychological well-being is a feeling of happiness (Ryff, 1989). The secret of human happiness lies in the individual’s ability to get pleasure while protecting himself from the life’s challenges. Happiness can only be achieved by developing a defense mechanism (Freud, 1993). For example, in a sample of depressed patients, there is evidence that awareness of the meaning of personal life can be a defense mechanism (Zeng et al., 2021).
The reason for the question of the actualization of the meaning of life is the incorrectly formed structure of human relations (Horney, 1977). A person’s life in a society creates problems in areas like work, professional self-determination, interpersonal relations, cooperation, friendship, relationship of opposite sex, love and marriage (Adler, 1998). When people are faced with global problems like this, the impossibility of solving them creates a state of existential vacuum - neurosis associated with apathy, depression and loss of interest in life (Laengle & Wurm, 2018). This means that the phenomenon of the meaning of life occurs when a person faces global problems in his or her life (Shon, Barton-Bellessa, 2015) and changes are needed to overcome them.
Circumstances related to global problems and challenges are: 1) in the conditions of determining personal space, in search of one’s role in society (Talay & Coninck, 2020); 2) during the reorganization period of life, when the previous lifestyle does not allow to achieve results. One is aware that by continuing his/ her old lifestyle, one will not achieve new and real success (Kreitler, 2019); 3) For many people, a difficult phase of change begins at the end of a certain period of life, in which a return to the basic values of life begins. This can lead to serious problems of meaning (feeling like nobody needs you, feeling powerless, loss or decreasing of self-esteem) (Macintyre et al., 2019); 4) experiencing death anxiety by witnessing a death, an inseparable disease or aging during the period of going through a death-related process (Maxfield et al., 2014)
Meaning Therapy was founded in 1946 by Victor Frankl. It is a therapy designed to find the meaning of life and deal with the existing existential vacuum (Bano, 2018). According to Frankl, the meaning of life is a certain process in which a responsible choice of action is made to solve global problems (Frankl, 1984).
So far, there is no strong opinion and unity in the literature on how to perceive the meaning of life. Overall, the meaning of life can be seen from the perspective of two sciences. Philosophy attempts to answer the question: "Why does a particular person exist in the world?", which can be applied to the concept of "meaning of life". On the other hand, psychology attempts to answer the question: "Why did a person perform certain actions, processes?" and usually associates the meaning of life with goals, values, motives, and needs. This direction can be applied to the concept of "meaning in life". In our opinion, it is worthwhile to develop further the view of the science of psychology and coin the term "meaning of life" within psychology community. Life is a dynamic phenomenon, conditions and life situations are subject to constant change, so the results are not constant and consistent. We will not gain an understanding of the necessary processes for overcoming the existential vacuum, if remain confined to an understanding of outcome, life goals, and motives, without understanding the complexities that have led people to crisis (Yaspers, 1991).
Analyzing the presented authors, it can be concluded that in order to get answers about the meaning of life, it is more important to study the whole process that a person wants to achieve with his / her actions (Debats et all., 1995; Martela & Steger, 2016). For example, not to identify motives, but to find out how they are integrated into life. To the question "What is the meaning of life in general, why do I live?" no answer will ever be found, but understanding the process is possible. A definite, structured model can help to summarize the steps needed to understand this process so that people can achieve a sense of meaningful life (Yaspers, 1991).
If we assume that the process itself is a means of overcoming the existential vacuum, then it is necessary to return to Frankl’s idea and identify the components of a dynamic process (which activates the choice, how the choice is made and what actions are to be taken) and make the meaning of life definition more applicable to solve global problems. This means that the information about components and definition must help to analyze a person’s personal life and thus lead to a possible solution. In order to achieve this goal, a model of this dynamic process needs to be developed with all of containing components which would construct the basis of the Meaning of Life Model.
A critical analysis of the literature identified the following components of the Meaning of Life Model: 1) antecedent (Wong, 2011; Steger, 2016; Burrow et al., 2010; Purvis, 2010); 2) individual behavioral styles (Nutten, 2004; Akhmerov, 2015; Gavrilova, 2015; Kuznetsova & Osin, 2015); 3) life space - spheres of functioning (Kumasheva, 2015; Bach, Heritier, Jean-Jacques, 2020; Shon, Barton-Bellessa, 2015; Walborn, 2014; Häfner, 2015; Chaplynska, 2020).
If the construct consists of three components, then at this stage it is possible to formulate the following definition of the meaning of life: The meaning of human life is the realization of an individual style of behavior in the life space, which is actualized by a certain antecedent. The result of the behavior is the achievement of psychological well-being, that is, life becomes important, the person returns to a stable emotional state, the activity takes place in the person’s self-realization.
Current study will look at the first component of the model - antecedents that activate the desired behavior.

Antecedents

The concept of A-B-C analysis includes desire to prevent the undesirable behavior by changing the antecedent. In the behavioral studies antecedent refers to the stimuli or activity that occurs immediately before the behavior (O’Reilly et al., 2012). For example, certain antecedent activates or stimulates actions to stabilize a person’s emotional state in a crisis situation and to achieve a balance between the causes of the crisis and daily processes.
A pilot study on the structure of the model of meaning of life (Dombrovskis, 2017) based on 72 dispositions have been confirmed eight antecedents that are constituent indicators of individual styles of behavior in crisis: achievements; power; success; development; freedom; uniqueness; interesting life; fleeing.
To add more additional factors to the previously identified list of antecedents, a critical literature analysis was performed. The analysis of the literature used the principle that the newly identified antecedents trigger only desirable actions that could not harm others and the person himself. This principle is based on an ethical concept from The Good Lives Model (Ward, Gannon & Vess, 2009). To be consistent with this principle, every factor has to be in line with these requirements: 1) uniqueness – created by a person himself by way of conversion of personal experience (Karpinskiy, 2015); 2) versatility – implementation may manifest via endeavors, as substructures (Poehlmann, 2006; Schnell, 2011); 3) awareness – understanding of the goal and expected result is present (Wong, 2011); 4) self-serving behavior – complete involvement in the process of implementation, achieving and maintaining the result is taking place (Kumisheva 2015; Wong, 2011).
A total of eight such factors that come into play by hindering or activating were distinguished: family relations; level of income; relations with friends/acquaintances; state of health; organization of free time; career growth (achievements); sexual life quality; level of education acquired.
The first factor: family relations. Close family relations characterized by high level of intimacy trigger a great deal of strong positive and negative emotional experiences, stresses (Horowitz & Strack, 2011; Regan, 2011). Presence of family relations is a factor that can trigger the behavior which aims to protect all involved family members, basically making them more resistant (Karney & Bradbury, 2005; Bodenmann & Randall, 2012). This means that relationships with loved ones affect what we want to achieve in life - we take into account their needs.
The second factor: level of income. Studies have demonstrated slowdown of behavioral activity (characterized by inactivity) occurs with the reduction of income and a strong interrelation with increased tension and distress (St-Pierre et al., 2019; Tremblay et al., 2006). Consequently, the level of income can impact the level of activity – low level of income can result in complete refusal of actions with a goal to realize the meaning of life.
The third factor: friendly relationships. Results of prolonged studies demonstrate that poor quality friendships and lower level of perceptual social support bring, with time, the increase of social uneasiness (Rapee et al., 2015; Rodebaugh et al., 2015). People maintaining successful and friendly relationships are expressing more high levels of self-control (Piccirillo et al., 2020), meaning that friendship is a factor that can affect the choice of behavior depending on its impact to the friends.
The fourth factor: state of health. A person with high level of health will typically activate actions allowing demonstrating high level of resistance against susceptibility to suggestion and minimizing the conflict between personal wishes and long-term goals (Hofmann et al., 2012; Luehring-Jones, Tahaney, & Palfai, 2018). Therefore, the level of someone’s health can impact the uniqueness of the meaning – the more improved health, the less stereotypical and social is likely to be the core of the meaning.
The fifth factor: free time. People preferring spending leisure time in a passive way (such as watching TV lying on the sofa) will be characterized by activation of behavior related to high level of avoiding responsibility (Kelly et al., 2020; Belair et al., 2018). It means that how you spend your free time is as a factor which car either mitigate or increase the risk to activate the action with the goal to pursuit the meaning of life.
The sixth factor: career. In order to integrate behavior used for managing the advancement of own career into own lifestyle, the individual behavior (Chan et al., 2012; Brown & Lent, 2017) must be built on the ability of self-regulation under circumstances that may be hard, complicated and ambiguous (Coetzee & Schreuder, 2017). Activation of the style of behavior of people making great success in career growth will be distinguished by meaningfulness and self-efficiency (Carmen et al., 2019).
The seventh factor: sexual life quality. Studies confirm maintaining interest and activity in sexual behavior until great age: masturbation, cheating, risky behavior on the internet (Baumgartner et al., 2010; Beutel et al., 2008; DeLamater & Moorman, 2007). Based on the results of research, the quality of sexual life always remains as an indicator of activation when choosing the style of behavior in interaction with other people throughout the entire life (Vance et al., 2019).
The eighth factor: education. Activation of the style of behavior of a person with higher level and quality of education will be characterized by persistence, high consciousness and passion for meeting the objectives (Rimfeld et al., 2016; Duckworth & Gross, 2014).
It is very important to understand that newly identified antecedents are components of the person’s life space. The life space means a person and their psychological environment. Every new antecedent can both activate the action and affect its quality. Meaning that quality state of life space and feeling of accomplishment of the meaning of life depend on the antecedents.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Measures

To collect an information about the antecedents, a research questionnaire Meaning of life scale (MOLS) was developed, and it included a survey by means of closed questions. The research questionnaire includes a “Antecedents scale” developed by the author Valērijs Dombrovskis. The structure of survey includes two parts: the purpose of the first part is to collect information on the significance of the antecedents in the lives of the respondents, while the second is to collect information on the demographic characteristics of the respondents. The first part contains 16 statements based on:
1. 
8 antecedents confirmed during the pilot study: achievements; power; success; development; freedom; uniqueness; interesting life; fleeing;
2. 
8 new antecedents based on the literature review, which affect activation of certain behavior: family relations; level of income; relations with friends/acquaintances; state of health; organization of free time; career growth (achievements); sexual life quality; quality of education received.
In the second part the following demographic variables were examined – income, educational level, sex, age, occupation and marital status.
The task of the respondents was to evaluate each factor’s level of significance in their lives. Responses were limited to a Likert-like scale using the following: no significance (0), slight significance (1), moderate significance (2), high significance (3) or total significance (4). The answers received were processed based on the following methods of analysis: exploratory factor analysis; SEM – structural equation modeling; confirmatory factor analysis; cluster analysis.

3.2. Procedure

Data of the study was gathered in 2021, from August to November, inclusive. A large portion of the group of respondents was formed by users of social media who completed the questionnaire electronically (59.3%), the smaller portion were approached frontally and individually (40.7%). In all cases, completing the questionnaire was voluntary, anonymous and without controlling the time for completion. Where necessary, the researcher could provide answers to any questions arising for the participant. Feedback to respondents, who had expressed such a wish, was provided within one week.

3.3. Data Analysis

Factor analysis was used to identify the underlying dimensions of the MOLS, using various criteria for item selection according to the number of selected factors and item factor loadings. Factor differentiation method: principal component method. Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. In order to verify some assumptions, prior to exploratory factor analysis (EFA), we analyzed the Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin’s (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy to assess if the items were significantly correlated and shared sufficient variance to justify factor extraction.
The reliability of the scale, in terms of internal consistency, was calculated by means of the alpha coefficient. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed using maximum likelihood (ML) estimation procedures. To assess the closeness of the hypothetical model to the empirical data statistically, multiple goodness-of-fit indexes were used, the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Bentler and Bonnet (1980) contend that values >0.90 indicate good fit for the TLI (Hu & Bentler 1999) contend that CFI values >0.90 are needed; and Byrne (1994) contends that a cutoff of 0.93 should indicate a good fit. Several aspects of concurrent validity were verified using the Pearson’s r coefficient.

4. Results

4.1. Participants

In due course of research, there were 1163 questionnaires distributed among the residents of Latvia and collected; a small number of questionnaires (53, which accounts for 4.5% of the total number) were found invalid, the main reason being only partial completion of questionnaires. There were 1110 respondents (633 women, 57%, and 477 men, 43%) participating further in the study. Age of respondents varied from 18 to 67 (M=33.88; SD =8,527). Participants were selected from the groups of people who were currently experiencing significant changes in their lives, therefore seeking for their personal meaning of life. Based on the theoretical notion of the expression of the meaning-seeking activity in the conditions of the existential vacuum, participants were: prisoners; clients of the State Employment Agency (SEA); clients of crisis centers; people who use the services of psychologists and therapists; bachelor students; nursing home residents; rehabilitation center patients.
Detailed social and demographical characteristics of the respondents are provided in Table 1. This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.

4.2. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)

Exploratory factor analysis was carried out for the meaning of minimizing dimensionality in the space of universal motives and circumstances.
Details of the suitability of data for structure detection are provided in Table 2. The factor analysis should be seen fit if KMO is within a range from 0.5 to 1. In the particular case, this indicator equals to 0.766 (approximately 76,6%), which is a sufficiently normal result and indicates that a factor analysis may be useful with data.
The results of the Bartlett’s test allow us to make a conclusion on whereas factor analysis is suitable choice for the sample of the study. The statistics determining feasibility of the factor analysis according to the Bartlett’s test is signification. If the level of signification is acceptable (under 0.05), the factor analysis is deemed feasible for analyzing the researched selected aggregate. In our case, the test in question demonstrates the acceptable level of signification (less than 0.001), which leads to the conclusion regarding feasibility of the factor analysis.
Exploratory factor analysis allowed exposing a 3-factor structure of the researched phenomenon: F1; F2; F3. The first of the distinguished factors explains 20.78% of the total dispersion, the second one – 18.26%, the third one – 16.15%.
Table 3. Factor structure matrix of the MOLS.
Table 3. Factor structure matrix of the MOLS.
Item/ Variable F1 F2 F3
Quality of education I16 0.749 0.230 -0.176
Achievements I4 0.724 0.029 -0.034
Level of income I10 0.663 -0.005 0.415
Relationship with the family I9 0.645 -0.016 0.075
Luck I3 0.557 0.084 0.285
Uniqueness I6 0.543 0.304 -0.207
Organizing free time in own life I13 0.533 0.521 -0.031
Development I1 -0.013 -0.889 0.044
Fleeing I8 0.122 0.694 0.030
Career growth (achievements) I14 0.085 0.624 0.471
Relationship with friends / acquaintances I11 0.040 0.618 -0.039
Freedom I5 0.339 0.355 0.304
Power I2 0.240 0.005 0.844
State of health I12 0.269 0.425 0.722
Quality of sexual life I15 0.291 0.098 -0.680
Interesting life I7 0.380 0.370 -0.485
Source: Dombrovskis.

4.3. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)

Conducting the confirmatory factor analysis uses the same data file, with respect to which the traditional factor analysis was applied. The 3-factor structure of the researched phenomenon exposed as the result of the exploratory factor analysis may be presented as a hypothetical model consisting of three parts, each of which corresponds to one of the factors exposed. The largest factor loads calculated as the result of conducting the confirmatory factor analysis under the factor F1 (process) feature such indicators as I16 (Uniqueness), I4 (Achievements), I9 (Relationship with the family), I3 (Luck). The dominating factor loads under the factor F2 (emotional experience) demonstrate indicators I13 (Organizing free time in own life), I8 (Fleeing), I14 (Career growth). Factor F3 (preservation/ protection of personal settings) is determined by indicators I2 (Power), I12 (State of health), I10 (Level of income).
The goodness-of-fit for this model: comparative fit index СFI=0.918; root mean square error of approximation RMSEA=0.249 (result exceeding 0.1 indicates that there is no fit); AGFI=0,875 (when the fit is good, this result should exceed 0.9). А priori goodness-of-fit model does not completely correspond to source data, so adjusting the model is required. An obvious way to adjust the model is to delete statistically unreliable links from the model. Such links include a link of factor F3 to indicator I15.
A posteriori model of the confirmatory factor analysis has resulted from adjustment of the a priori goodness-of-fit (theoretical) model by recursion. Critical ratio for multidimensional excess c.r. = 1.912, which is significantly below 5; consequently, the assumption regarding multidimensional normality of variables has not been breached. The principal goodness-of-fit for this model: comparative fit index СFI=0.976; root mean square error of approximation RMSEA=0.050; AGFI=0.941. The goodness-of-fit values are within the allowable range. So, the model with crossing factors has been empirically confirmed.

4. Discussion

The article raises the question of the meaning of life, which typically refers more to the phenomena of the philosophical category rather than psychological. However, the main task of the research is to shift from the philosophical view to the psychological and practical significance regarding the meaning of life construct in order to impact people’s quality of life.
In the introductory part of the article, the practical significance of this phenomenon was revealed, namely, its impact on a person’s psychological well-being. In order to strengthen its practical significance, using critical analysis of the literature the components of the construct of the meaning of life have been identified (antecendents, styles of individual behavior and spheres of functioning). The selected components allowed to create a new meaning of life definition, allowing to combine these components and give practical significance to the phenomenon itself.
The practical part of the article shows the study of only one identified component of the meaning of life construct – antecedents of the meaning of life that will serve as the basis for the Meaning of Life Model.
Our current findings are giving a new outlook to the possible structure of The Meaning of Life Model. Primarily, we approved the existence of 16 antecedents which will serve as the main components of The Meaning of Life Model. Secondly, in our study we incorporated an idea about the fear factor which can affect the development of a certain antecedences (Engeser & Langens 2010; Schönbrodt & Gerstenberg 2012), for example, fear induced antecedents like achievement, power and fleeing. Thirdly, it is considered that antecedents can predict which action will be chosen by a person when pursuing the meaning of life.
Exploratory factor analysis allowed exposing a 3-factor structure based on the 16 antecedents: F1; F2; F3 – main categories in which antecedents were combined. Factor F1 included the following indicators: quality of education (r = 0.749), achievements (r = 0.724), level of income (r = 0.663), relationship with the family (r = 0.645), luck (r = 0.557), uniqueness (r = 0.543), organizing free time in own life (r = 0.533). The factor indicates the necessity for realization (Chaplynska 2020). Realization of behavior requires a specific task going beyond daily routines (Chaplynska 2020). Category that can possibly answer about analysis of circumstances suitable for the achievement of objectives.
Factor F2 included the following indicators: organizing free time in own life (r = 0.521), development (r = -0.889), fleeing (r = 0.694), career growth (achievements) (r = 0.624), relationship with friends / acquaintances (r = 0.618), state of health (r = 0.425). This is a factor indicating the need to receive pleasure (Pinto et al., 2012). Realization of behavior requires only a certain level of intensity of feelings and coherence with social norms (Bach, Heritier, Jean-Jacques 2020). This category is responsible for satisfying personal needs and the required level of feelings.
Factor F3 included the following indicators: level of income (r = 0.415), career growth (achievements) (r = 0.471), power (r = 0.844), state of health (r = 0.722), quality of sexual life (r = -0.680). This is a factor indicating the need to achieve a certain level of power. Realization of behavior requires achieving appreciation on the account of implementing the mission (Walborn 2014). This category is responsible for regulation of our own behavior and the attempt to make the public think and act in a certain way (Grevenstein, Aguilar-Raab & Bluemke 2018).
Analyzing the indicators in the space of the highlighted factors F1, F2 and F3 allowed making the assumption regarding existence of three predominant sectors (functional areas): process, emotional experience, preservation/ protection of personal settings, in which antecedents are implemented through activating actions. To put it in other words, the level of psychological wellbeing depends on the level of implementation of the chosen antecedent.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study shows that MOLS is a tool for determining the personal significance of key factors for adults within The Meaning of Life Model in progress. The findings suggest that the potential The Meaning of Life Model should include at least 16 different factors, which would serve as a basis for the structure of the model. Our results definitely require further research to develop the practicality of the meaning of life phenomenon. The next step is to understand the significance of the identified three-factor structure and to interpret it while The Meaning of Life Model is in the developmental stage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.D. and L.B.; software, S.I.; validation and formal analysis, V.D. and S.I.; resources, V.D.; writing-original draft preparation, review and editing V.D. and L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to CODE OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY, RISEBA University of Applied Sciences, NL 0078-01.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adler, A. (1998). Lichnostnyy smysl // Filosofskiye nauki. № 1. M.
  2. Akhmerov, R. А. (2015). Ponyatiya «schastya» i «smysla zhizni» v kauzometricheskom psikhobiograficheskom podkhode. Psychological problems of the meaning of life and acme: Electronic digest of materials of XX Symposium / edited. G.A. Weiser, N.V. Kiselnikova, T.A. Popova - M .: FGBNU "Psychological Institute RAO". https://elib.grsu.by/doc/13880.
  3. Bach, L., Heritier, M., & Jean-Jacques, R. (2020). “The notion of the evidential paradigm in the development of psychoanalysis by Sigmund Freud.” L’Évolution Psychiatrique 85: 265-272. [CrossRef]
  4. Bano B., (2018). The human being in the image of the divine - the psychology of Victor Frankl. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 21 (6), pp. 643-644. [CrossRef]
  5. Baumgartner, S.E., Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. 2010. “Unwanted online sexual solicitation and risky sexual online behavior across the lifespan.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 31: 439-447. [CrossRef]
  6. Belair, M.A., Kohen, D.E., Kingsbury, M., & Colman, I. (2018). “Relationship between leisure time physical activity, sedentary behaviour and symptoms of depression and anxiety: evidence from a population-based sample of Canadian adolescents.” BMJ Open 8. [CrossRef]
  7. Beutel, M.E., Stöbel-Richter, Y., & Brähler, E. (2008). “Sexual desire and sexual activity of men and women across their lifespans: Results from a representative German community survey.” BJU International 101: 76-82. [CrossRef]
  8. Bijou, S.W., Peterson, R.F., & Ault, M.H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1: 175-191. [CrossRef]
  9. Bodenmann, G., & Randall, A.K. (2012). Common factors in the enhancement of dyadic coping. Behavioral therapy 201 (43): 88-98. [CrossRef]
  10. Brown, S.D., Lent, R.W. (2017). “Social cognitive career theory in a diverse world: Closing thoughts.” Journal of Career Assessment 25 (1): 173-180. [CrossRef]
  11. Burrow, A. L., O’Dell, A. C., & Hill, P. L. (2010). Profiles of a developmental asset: Youth purpose as a context for hope and well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, volume 39, pp. 1265–1273. [CrossRef]
  12. Carmen, M., López, P., José, M., López, G., Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2019). “Applying the social cognitive model of career self-management to the entrepreneurial career decision: The role of exploratory and coping adaptive behaviours.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 112: 255-269. [CrossRef]
  13. Chan, K.Y., Ho, M.R., Chernyshenko, O.S., Bedford, O., Uy, M.A., Gomulya, D., Phan, W.M.J. (2012). “Entrepreneurship, professionalism, leadership: A framework and measure for understanding boundaryless careers.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81 (1): 73-88. [CrossRef]
  14. Chaplynska, Y. A. (2020). The identity of the offender as an element of the forensic characteristic of the crime. Actual problems of native jurisprudence. [CrossRef]
  15. Coetzee, M., Schreuder, D. (2017). Proactive career self-management: Exploring links among psychosocial career attributes and adaptability resources. South Africa Journal of Psychology 48 (2): 206-218. [CrossRef]
  16. Debats, D. L., Drost, J., & Hansen, P. (1995). Experiences of meaning in life - A combined qualitative and quantitative approach. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 359–375. [CrossRef]
  17. Dombrovskis, V. (2017). A model for individual‘s meaning of life. Social sciences bulletin. 2 (25): 87-102.
  18. Duckworth, A.L., Gross, J.J. (2014). Self-control and grit: related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (5): 319-325. [CrossRef]
  19. Engeser, S., Langens, T.A., (2010). Mapping explicit social motives of achievement, power, and affiliation onto the five-factor model of personality. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 51: 309-318. [CrossRef]
  20. Frankl, V. (1984) Man’s Search for Meaning. Washington Square Press, New York.
  21. Freud, A. (1993). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. London: Karnac Books.
  22. Gavrilova, Т.А. (2015) Informatsionnyye cennosti kak smyslozhiznennyye oriyentatsii podrostkov. Psychological problems of the meaning of life and acme: Electronic digest of materials of XX Symposium / edited. G.A. Weiser, N.V. Kiselnikova, T.A. Popova - M.: FGBNU "Psychological Institute RAO". https://elib.grsu.by/doc/13880.
  23. Glawa, X., Hazelton, M., Kable, A., Inder, K. (2020). Exploring academics beliefs about the meaning of life to inform mental health clinical practice. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 34 (2): 36-42. [CrossRef]
  24. Grevenstein, D., Aguilar-Raab, C., & Bluemke, M. (2018). “Mindful and resilient? Incremental validity of sense of coherence over mindfulness and Big Five personality factors for quality-of-life outcomes.” Journal of Happiness Studies 19: 1883–1902. [CrossRef]
  25. Häfner, H. (2015). Descriptive psychopathology, phenomenology, and the legacy of Karl Jaspers. Dialogues Clin Neuroscience, volume 17, Issue 1, pp. 19-29. [CrossRef]
  26. Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., Fang, A. (2012). The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cognitive theory and research 36 (5): 427-440. [CrossRef]
  27. Horowitz, L.M., Strack, S. (2011). Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology: Theory, Research, Assessment, and Therapeutic Interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  28. Horney, K. (1977). The neurotic personality of our time. Routledge and Kegan Paul, New York.
  29. Karney, B.R., Bradbury, T.N. (2005). Contextual influences on marriage: Implications for policy and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14: 171–174. [CrossRef]
  30. Karpinskiy, К.V. (2015). Strategii psihologicheskogo issledovaniya smisla zhizni: makroanaliz vs mikroanaliz. Psychological problems of the meaning of life and acme: Electronic digest of materials of XX Symposium / edited. G.A. Weiser, N.V. Kiselnikova, T.A. Popova - M.: FGBNU "Psychological Institute RAO". https://elib.grsu.by/doc/13880.
  31. Kreitler, S. (2019). Towards a consensual model in personality psychology. Personality and Individual Differences, volume 147, pp. 156-165. [CrossRef]
  32. Kelly, C. M., Strauss, K., Arnold, J., Stridea, C. (2020). The relationship between leisure activities and psychological resources that support a sustainable career: The role of leisure seriousness and work-leisure similarity. Journal of Vocational Behavior 117: 103340. [CrossRef]
  33. Kumisheva, P. М. (2015). Genezis i transformaciya smisla v processe vzaimodejstviya cheloveka s vneshnim mirom. Psychological problems of the meaning of life and acme: Electronic digest of materials of XX Symposium / edited. G.A. Weiser, N.V. Kiselnikova, T.A. Popova - M .: FGBNU "Psychological Institute RAO". https://elib.grsu.by/doc/13880.
  34. Kuznetsova, S. S., & Osin, E.N. (2015). Zhizn’ so smyslom i bez nego: individual’nyye strategii vystraivaniya zhizni. Psychological problems of the meaning of life and acme: Electronic digest of materials of XX Symposium / edited. G.A. Weiser, N.V. Kiselnikova, T.A. Popova - M .: FGBNU "Psychological Institute RAO". https://elib.grsu.by/doc/13880.
  35. Längle, A. (2008). Existenzanalyse. In: A. Längle, & A. Holzhey-Kunz, (Eds.), Existenz-analyse und Daseinsanalyse. Vienna: Facultas University-Press.
  36. Laengle, S., Wurm, C. (2018). Living Your Own Life: Existential Analysis in Action. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.
  37. Leath C. 1999. The experience of meaning in life from a psychological perspective. Junior Paper, Psychology Honors Program.
  38. Luehring-Jones, P., Tahaney, K., Palfai, T. (2018). The effect of self-control on drinking outcomes is mediated by automatic appetitive responses to alcohol. Personality and Individual Differences 125: 116-119. [CrossRef]
  39. Marshall, M., Marshall, E. (2012). Logotherapy Revisited: Review of the Tenets of Viktor E. Frankl’s Logotherapy. Ottawa: Ottawa Institute of Logotherapy.
  40. Martela, F., Steger, M. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology 11(5):1-15. [CrossRef]
  41. Masson, T., Otto, S. (2021). Explaining the difference between the predictive power of value orientations and self-determined motivation for proenvironmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 73: 101555. [CrossRef]
  42. Macintyre, P. D., Rossa, J., Talbot, K., Mercer, S., Gregersen, T., Banga, C. A. (2019). Stressors, personality and wellbeing among language teachers. System, volume 82, p.p. 26-38. [CrossRef]
  43. Maxfield, M., John, S., Pyszczynski, T. (2014). A terror management perspective on the role of death-related anxiety in psychological dysfunction. The Humanistic Psychologist, 42 (2014), pp. 35-53. [CrossRef]
  44. Nyutten, ZH. (2004). Motivatsiya, deystviye i perspektiva budushchego. M.: Smysl.
  45. O’Reilly, M. et al. (2012). Examination of an antecedent communication intervention to reduce tangibly maintained challenging behavior: A controlled analog analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities 33 (5): 1462-1468. [CrossRef]
  46. . [CrossRef]
  47. Piccirillo, M. L., Lim, M. H., Fernandez, K. A., Pasch, L. A., Rodebaugh, T. L. (2021). Social Anxiety Disorder and Social Support Behavior in Friendships. Behavior Therapy 52 (3): 720-733. [CrossRef]
  48. Pinto, D. G., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Dayc, L. (2012). A behavioral test of Horney’s linkage between authenticity and aggression: People living authentically are less-likely to respond aggressively in unfair situations. Personality and Individual Differences 52 (10): 41-44. [CrossRef]
  49. Poehlmann, K. (2006. Structural properties of personal meaning systems: A new approach to measuring meaning of life. The Journal of Positive Psychology 1 (3): 109 – 117. [CrossRef]
  50. Purvis, M. (2010). Seeking a Good Life: Human Goods and Sexual Offending. Lambert Academic Press: Germany. ISBN-13: 978-3838331522.
  51. Rapee, R.M., Peters, L., Carpenter, L., Gaston, J.E. (2015). The Yin and Yang of support from significant others: Influence of general social support and partner support of avoidance in the context of treatment for social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 69: 40-47. [CrossRef]
  52. Regan, P. (2011). Close Relationships. N. Y.: Routledge. [CrossRef]
  53. Rimfeld K., Kovas Y., Dale P.S., Plomin R. 2016. “True grit and genetics: predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 111 (5): 780-789. [CrossRef]
  54. Rodebaugh, T.L., Lim M.H., Shumaker, E.A., Levinson, C.A., Thompson, T. (2015). Social anxiety and friendship quality over time. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 44 (6): 502-511. [CrossRef]
  55. Ryff, C.D. (1989). Beyond Ponce De Leon and life satisfaction: new directions in the quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, pp. 35-55. [CrossRef]
  56. Schnell, T. (2011). Individual differences in meaning-making: Considering the variety of sources of meaning, their density and diversity. Personality and Individual Differences 51 (5): 667-673. [CrossRef]
  57. Schönbrodt, F. D., Gerstenberg, F.X.R. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales. Journal of Research in Personality 46 (6): 725-742. [CrossRef]
  58. Schulenberg, E S., Nassif, C., Rogina, J. (2008). Logotherapy for clinical practice Psychotherapy. Theory Research Practice Training 45(4): 447-63. [CrossRef]
  59. Steger, M. F. (2016). The Meaningful Identity: A Longitudinal Look at the Interplay Between Identity and Meaning in Life in Adolescence. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 11, 1926–1936. [CrossRef]
  60. Shon, C. P. H., Barton-Bellessa, S., (2015). The assumption of rational choice theory in Alfred Adler’s theory of crime: Unraveling and reconciling the contradiction in Adlerian theory through synthesis and critique. Aggression and Violent Behavior, volume 25, pp. 95-103. [CrossRef]
  61. St-Pierre, M., Sinclair, I., Elgbeili, G., Bernard, P., Dancause, K. N. (2019). Relationships between psychological distress and health behaviors among Canadian adults: Differences based on gender, income, education, immigrant status, and ethnicity”. SSM - Population Health 7: 100385. [CrossRef]
  62. Talay, L., Coninck, D. D. (2020). Exploring the link between personality traits and European attitudes towards refugees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, volume 77, pp. 13-24. [CrossRef]
  63. Tremblay, M.S., Bryan, S.N., Pérez, C.E., Ardern, C.I., Katzmarzyk, P.T. (2006). Physical activity and immigrant status: Evidence from the Canadian community health survey. Canadian Journal of Public Health 97: 277. [CrossRef]
  64. Vance, G., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Abed, M. G. (2019). “Later life sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior”. Personality and Individual Differences 157: 109730. [CrossRef]
  65. Walborn, F. (2014). Chapter 13 - Victor Frankl. Religion in Personality Theory: 279-298.
  66. Ward, T., Gannon, T., & Vess, J. (2009). Human rights and ethical principles and standards in forensic psychology. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 53: 126-144. [CrossRef]
  67. Wong, P. (2011). The Positive Psychology of Meaning in Life and Well-Being. New York, NY: Springer. [CrossRef]
  68. World Health Organization. (2019). The WHO special initiative for mental health (2019-2023): universal health coverage for mental health. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/310981.
  69. Yaspers, K. (1991). Smysl i naznacheniya istorii. Per. s nem. M.
  70. Zeng, Y., Long, A., Chiang, C., Chiu, N., Sun, F. (2021). Exploring the meaning of life from the perspective of patients with depression: A phenomenological study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 427-433. [CrossRef]
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Valērijs Dombrovskis: PhD student at the University of Daugavpils, lecturer and director of the bachelor’s program “Business Psychology”, RISEBA University of Applied Sciences, Latvian Association of Cyberpsychology, Riga, Latvia.
Svetlana Ignatjeva: Head of Computer Science Department of Daugavpils University, guest lecturer and a researcher at Tyumen State University, Daugavpils, Latvia
Luīze Berga: Independent researcher, Latvian Association of Cyberpsychology, Riga, Latvia.
Table 1. Profile of participants.
Table 1. Profile of participants.
Demographic item Frequency Frequency
Men 477 43.0
Women 633 57.0
Average age 33.88±8,527
Principal occupation
Students 222 20.0
People who use the services of psychologists and therapists 378 34.1
Rehabilitation center patients 141 12.7
Clients of SEA 171 15.3
Prisoners 135 12.2
Nursing home residents 63 5.7
Note: sample size = 1110.
Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s test.
Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s test.
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy 0.766
Bartlett’s test of sphericity Chi-squared 9760.163
Degrees of freedom (df) 120
Signification <0.001
Source: Dombrovskis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated