Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

A Review on Photonic Sensing Technologies: Status and Outlook

Altmetrics

Downloads

357

Views

65

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

28 April 2023

Posted:

28 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
In contemporary science and technology, photonic sensors are essential. They may be made to be extremely resistant to some physical parameters while also being extremely sensitive to other physical variables. Most photonic sensors may be incorporated on chips and operate with CMOS technology, making them suitable for use as extremely sensitive, compact, and affordable sensors. Photonic sensors can detect electromagnetic (EM) wave changes and convert them into an electric signal due to the photoelectric effect. Depending on the requirements, scientists have found ways to develop photonic sensors based on several interesting platforms. In this work, we extensively reviewed the most generally utilized photonic sensors for detecting vital environmental parameters and personal healthcare. These sensing systems include optical waveguides, optical fibers, plasmonics, metasurfaces, and photonic crystals. Various aspects of light are used to investigate photonic sensors' transmission or reflection spectra. In general, resonant cavity or grating-based sensor configurations that work on wavelength interrogation methods are preferred, so these sensor types are mostly presented. We believe this paper will provide insight into the novel types of available photonic sensors.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Materials Science and Technology

1. Introduction

In the realm of optical signal development for sensing applications in many fields, particularly in chemical and biochemical detection, angular rate rotation estimation, and electric field detection, waveguide (W/G)-based devices are becoming more and more appealing. The fascination with optical sensing is supported by unparalleled benefits made possible by photonic technologies, such as high sensitivity (S), compatibility with electronic devices, compactness, metal-free operation, affordability, and EM resistance. Ring resonators (RRs) and surface plasmons (SPs) have recently caught the attention of scientists since they can significantly improve the effectiveness of integrated photonic sensors [1,2,3]. Photonic sensors built on fiber and W/G technology have drawn much attention because they have a broad range of possible uses [4]. Because they are immune to EM fields, optical sensors function better than other types of sensors, especially in severe conditions like those found in electrical power generating and conversion plants. Distributed fiber sensors open new possibilities for monitoring cables, pipelines, and locations that require high levels of security. Additionally, optical biosensors are becoming more and more crucial, for instance, in solutions for labs-on-chips in healthcare [5].
By effectively transforming the bio-entity into an electrical form that can be studied using a spectrometer, photonic sensors are designed to detect a range of bio analytes [6]. It is possible to distinguish between normal and cancerous cells using electrical properties and examining the electric field [7]. In addition, the refractive indices of different analytes become an important factor in creating accurate biosensors [8,9,10]. Label-free biosensors are a potential type of biomolecular detector since they do not require a fluorescent, radio, or enzymatic label. Depending on such a label to recognize a biomolecular interaction might negatively influence sensing performance, either by interacting with the binding event or by non-specific adsorption of the labeling molecule [11]. There are several well-developed approaches for direct label-free detection of bound target biomolecules, comprising optical [12,13], electrical [14], and acoustic sensing devices [15]. Due to their ability for multiplexed detections, ability to work in aquatic conditions, and capacity to focus EM energy into tiny mode volumes, optically resonant devices are gaining significance within the larger class of label-free sensing tools. To create optically resonant biosensors, a variety of architectural designs, such as photonic crystals (PCs) [16], microtoroids [17], and ring/racetracks [2,18,19], have been studied.
In this paper, recent advancements in the field of photonic sensors based on optical W/Gs, optical fibers (OFs), metasurfaces (MSs), PCs, and plasmonics are thoroughly discussed for numerous sensing applications. These sensors are highly appealing due to their compact size and high sensitivity. In Section 2, recent advances in photonic sensors based on W/Gs are discussed. Several novel W/G designs are investigated to enhance the S of the photonic sensors. Section 3 discusses the progress in OF-based sensors, which can be utilized for diverse applications, including biochemical sensing and environmental monitoring. PC-based fibers are susceptible to the ambient medium, which opens the way for advancing highly sensitive fiber-based sensors. Section 4 discusses the recent developments in PC W/G-based sensors. The application of PCs in photonic sensor design is extensive. One can identify any physical processes, such as temperature, pressure, strain, and the presence of chemicals and biomolecules, that can alter the periodicity and refractive index (RI) of the formation of the PC by monitoring optical properties like the spectral trend of reflected and transmitted power. Over the past 20 years, metamaterials have attracted much interest because of their outstanding EM features. The MS's transient reaction is necessary for applications in modern science and technology, but the traditional MS's functionality is restricted in terms of tuning and customization. The structure, shape, and topology of the meta-atoms in conventional MSs normally govern their static, preset optical capabilities. In Section 5, the recent advances in MS-based photonic sensors are discussed. Last but not the least, plasmonic sensors are a hot topic these days, which has fascinated researchers to develop eye-catching and highly sensitive plasmonic devices. In Section 6, the plasmonic sensors established on metal-insulator-metal (MIM) W/G are thoroughly discussed. And the paper ends with concluding remarks, as mentioned in Section 7.
Preprints 72139 g001
Figure 1. Photonic sensing technologies based on (a) optical W/G [20], (b) OF [21], (c) MS [22], (d) PC [24], and (e) plasmonics [25], discussed in this paper.
Figure 1. Photonic sensing technologies based on (a) optical W/G [20], (b) OF [21], (c) MS [22], (d) PC [24], and (e) plasmonics [25], discussed in this paper.
Preprints 72139 g001

2. Optical Waveguide-Based Sensors

Devices that can track changes in light speed include optical W/Gs made of various materials [26]. Making silicon (Si) W/Gs nowadays may be done affordably and effectively with the help of silicon foundries and modern technologies [27]. In this domain, it may make sense to detect various materials while taking different W/G designs into account [28,29,30]. A good approach to this issue is to consider how this technology may also be useful for communication systems and generating THz. Future research for this study might include optical W/G and quantum computing [31]. Using optical Si W/Gs in this field is crucial, as demonstrated by recent work with Intel on quantum computers [32]. Thanks to optical memory, computers will soon be able to speed up even more and circumvent Moore's Law [33]. The W/G design is one of the intriguing concepts in optical W/Gs. Another thing that can enhance the device's functionality is W/G structural optimization. For this kind of study, simulation and manufacturing techniques are essential because they allow for time and cost savings while providing a more accurate picture of real devices.
Si photonic biosensors that use the SOI platform detect molecular contact events using near-infrared light constrained in an optical W/G. The evanescent field, or fraction of the E-field of the light that travels beyond the W/G, can interplay with the adjacent volume to form an external RI-sensitive zone. The aggregation of molecules with various refractive indices modifies the exterior RI. It disturbs the evanescent field when target molecules connect to receptors at the surface of the W/G, which then affects how guided light behaves inside the W/G, as shown in Figure 2. Analytes of concern can be found instantly by observing the outgoing light's coupling and/or propagation characteristics [34]. Since the evanescent field decays linearly into the bulk medium over a distance of a few tens to a few hundreds of nanometers, the sensing signal of an analyte collected within the decay length differs noticeably from the signal of an analyte drifting far from the surface. Thus, depending on the evanescent field sensor's response, we can discriminate between the target molecules still in bulk solution (bulk sensing) and those trapped on the surface (surface sensing). Moreover, optical W/Gs based on SOI platforms offer an elegant alternative for detecting trace gases that utilizes evanescent field absorption sensing. Gas sensors that rely on evanescent field absorption can only be used when the gas being monitored exhibits the expected absorption line at the appropriate wavelength. The optical attenuation at a certain wavelength and the gas conc. are also related. Several gas sensors built on OF [35,36] and W/Gs [29,37,38] have been suggested to function on this phenomenon.
Due to their capability for multiplexed detection and their capacity to concentrate EM energy into tiny mode volumes, optically resonant devices hold promise as label-free biomolecular sensors. The fact that biomolecular interactions are restricted to the resonant device's surface and the strongest EM energy is confined inside the core is a basic constraint of current optical biosensor technology. Ring resonator (RR)-based nanoporous polymer optofluidic devices indicate a 40% improvement in polymer device S that is ascribed to the surge in light-matter interactions [20]. To couple light into polymeric W/Gs, an Ando AQ4321D laser source (tunable between 1520 nm and 1620 nm) was employed. The chip and fiber are positioned on 3-axis stages to guarantee precise alignment. To avoid picking up dispersed light, the W/G's input and output facets are moved inward by 3 mm. Figure 3a illustrates how light entering the W/G is gathered, collimated, and then routed via a polarizer to only choose the TM mode before arriving at the photodetector [20]. A RR imaged through the device and covered in an aqueous solution is shown in Figure 3b [20]. Figure 3c displays a standard spectrum from the RRs. Water serves as the cladding liquid, and a 1mW laser pulse is connected to the W/G. Roughly 40–100 microwatts of electricity are gathered at the detector after coupling and scattering losses. Extinctions between 3 and 15 dB at the resonant wavelength and Q-factors between 1000 and 3000 are seen, relying on the fabrication perfection of the RR [20].
In the preceding ten years, several analytical research has been carried out to improve W/G geometries for optical sensing [39,40]. Figure 4 illustrates the three predominant types of W/Gs that are commonly used. These consist of slot W/Gs, strip W/Gs, and rib W/Gs [41,42,43]. The top cladding material, which contains the analyte, is being substantially penetrated by the guided mode's evanescent field. The amount of light that enters the upper cladding of each W/G structure varies, and this variation correlates to unwanted optical losses; the more light that enters the upper cladding, the bigger the optical losses through absorption and scattering. Light is mostly constrained inside the high index Si core of W/G structures like strips and ribs, but in slot W/G design, light can be significantly trapped in the subwavelength low index medium sandwiched between two Si rails. Slot W/Gs are far more sensitive than ridge W/Gs because there is more spatial interaction between the evanescent and sensing environments. Slot W/Gs are hence a well-liked option for bulk index sensing. A proper W/G type must be chosen according to the situation. Low optical losses are attained at the cost of S of rib W/G. Conversely, slot W/Gs have excellent S but a considerable optical loss. As demonstrated in Figure 4, Ridge W/Gs, on the other hand, offer a superb combination of loss and S. The S of the W/G typically increases along with the strength of the light-matter interaction, although optical losses also increase. Table 1 presents some novel works on Photonic sensors established on different W/G components.
Another way of developing SOI-based RR sensor systems includes structures with Bragg gratings (BGs) and slot W/Gs [44,45,46,47]. The interest in grating structures is caused by the desire to increase the interaction zone of the ring with the analyzed substance (weakly manifested in the standard strip RR), which allows for increasing the S of the sensor [48]. The periodically corrugated W/G region can be used as a light coupling area, which is very sensitive to changes in the RI of the background environment, which can be expressed in a shift of the resonant wavelength in the spectrum. There are a variety of combinations of grating structures with μ-RRs: BG-based RR with directional W/G [49]; slot directional W/Gs with slot RR and BGs [50]; SWG racetrack RR [48]. The combination of RR and BG structures reduces fabrication tolerances and environmental perturbations on the resulting characteristic, which occurs in the resonant structure [49].

3. Optical Fiber-Based Sensors

Utilizing the concept of total internal reflection, OFs allow for the correlation of the light intensity measured at the detector with the original target concentration [67]. To interact with the target analyte, bio-receptors such as oligonucleotides, antibodies, and enzymes can be mounted on the core surface of the fiber. Following the creation of a standard reference curve, this interplay will affect the sensitive layer's characteristics and be correlated with the analyte concentration. Fiber-optic biosensors have the benefits of high S, resilience, durability, quick detection, high S, and real-time surveillance and are immune to EM interference [68]. These characteristics help OF biosensors work well because they can simultaneously and discretely transmit light of several wavelengths. They may be employed for multiple analyte detection employing numerous DNA probes [69]. They can be carried out label-free or label-based and can be integrated on a single chip. OF sensors come in a wide range of configurations. There are many options for OF sensors to detect different physical, chemical, and biological factors since the optical properties of most materials are inherently sensitive to their environment.
A uniform W/G with periodic RI fluctuations running across it is known as a BG structure. Because of these irregularities, any broadband signal passing through the W/G will only reflect a portion of its spectrum in a 1D- photonic bandgap. Intuitively, BG W/Gs are similar to the well-established fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs). For almost 30 years, lasers have been used to create FBGs, which are narrowband mirrors built into OFs that are frequently used for WDM adjustable filtering, and—when chirped—dispersion compensation in optical communications systems. These systems are frequently used in sensing areas since their resonant (reflected) wavelength is very receptive to environmental variables like temperature, RI, and strain [70,71,72,73]. In 1978, Ken Hill made the discovery of FBG at the Canadian Communication Research Centre [74,75]. Since their creation, grating patterns have attracted a lot of attention in the field of optical sensing due to their great qualities, including their affordable, small size, real-time reaction, high accuracy, high sensitivity, and EM interference. It is feasible to measure several properties such as temperature, pressure, tension, and RI utilizing grating-based devices. FBGs are used in a wide variety of fields today, including high-temperature sensors, medical and biological devices, harsh environments, structural engineering, the oil industry, radioactive settings, and aircraft, marine, and civil engineering [76,77,78]. Since the effective index of the majority of glass materials is near 1.5, the Bragg response in the telecom band at 1550 nm necessitates a brief grating period of around 500 nm. LPG, EFBG, tilted FBG, microstructured FBG, PC Fibers, LPG inscribed in PCF, and tilted FBG coupled with SPR are a few illustrations of OF grating-based biosensors that are documented to function following diverse operating principles. The evolution of chemo- and biosensors are increasingly dependent on optical grating sensors like LPG, EFBG, and tilted FBG sensing apparatuses owing to their label-free RI measuring characteristics. Some of these FBG biosensor concepts have been investigated for thrombin biosensor development [79,80,81].
The evolution of carbon dioxide (CO2) detection is crucial for the preservation of the environment. To overcome this difficulty, a novel polyether sulfone (PES)-coated FBG sensor is presented [82]. When exposed to CO2, the PES coating displays volume dilatation and can transmit stress to the grating, changing the grating's period and RI. The low-temperature spin coating and high-temperature curing processes are used to provide standardized and homogeneous PES coating, which is essential for the reproducibility and durability of the sensing device. Investigations were done on the effectiveness of the FBG sensor and its influencing elements. The greatest Bragg wavelength shift is inversely correlated with temperature and highly associated with coating thickness. The PES-coated FBG sensor has a minimum reaction time of 3.27 minutes and exhibits strong selectivity to CO2. For CO2 detection, the LOD can be as low as 0.78%. Eventually, a system for over-conc. alerts was created for online CO2 monitoring. The PES-coated FBG sensor's exceptional qualities, together with its inexpensive and straightforward construction technique, open a wide range of application possibilities. An over-conc. alert system is created to be used with the PES-coated FBG sensing device in online checking systems as shown in Figure 5a–d [82]. The apparatus continually records the current value of the wavelength for each group after receiving the initial wavelength values for the experimental group and the control group. When the limit is exceeded, the created software raises an alert and turns on the warning light when the change in Bragg wavelength shift between the experimental group and the control group is larger.
As intriguing alternatives to the most conventional ones established on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or interferometric setups, OF gratings are being presented more commonly as optical platforms for label-free biosensing [83,84]. The effectiveness of OF gratings is comparable to that of more traditional optical platforms but with the inherent benefits of OFs, including exhibiting a significant and prospective compact size, high compatibility with optoelectronic devices (both sources and detectors), and, finally, multiplexing, and remote measurement possibility because the signal is spectrally modulated. Traditional prism-coupling-based SPR sensing apparatuses come in two forms: Kretschmann [85] and Otto [86] arrangements. These sensor designs are established on attenuated total reflection as their underlying operating principle. Kretschmann-based SPR pattern devices are widely employed in sensor applications due to their exceptional performance, although they are subject to several limitations. These instruments are frequently large and made with moving parts. As a result, they cannot be utilized for remote monitoring or other portable applications. Additionally, spectral-based measurements are costly to apply realistically, and scaling down the sensor size is less likely. To effectively handle these upcoming difficulties, OF-based SPRs have been implemented. The OFs are compact and inexpensive. Total internal reflection underlies the transmission of light via OFs, and an SPR sensor configuration established on OFs offers several advantages over one established on prisms [87]. Additionally, the OF's compactness allows for a considerable reduction in the size of the sensor that might be employed for remote sensing purposes. OF-based SPR sensing apparatuses provide a larger dynamic range for recognition and higher resolution but are only useful for constrained acceptance angles [88]. Numerous OF SPR sensing apparatuses have been identified in theoretical and experimental research [89,90].
Jorgenson et al. proposed the first OF-based SPP setup without the bulk prism in 1993 [91]. The interplay of evanescent waves with SPPs was used to show an OF-based SPP RI sensor. The fiber cladding was partially removed, and a highly reflective coating was applied to the exposed area. The transmission or reflection properties of the light propagating are often the basis for the operating mechanism of the plasmonic sensing apparatuses produced on OFs [92]. Noble metal and immobilized ligands are used in transmission probe based OF sensing apparatuses to detect unidentified analytes [93]. In contrast, the backlight is reflected to the fiber by a mirror in sensing apparatuses established on a reflection probe. With noble metals assembled on the engraved cladding section of the transmission probe, a variety of fiber-optic plasmonic sensors have previously been investigated. These include single-mode fibers (SMFs) [94], multi-mode fibers (MMFs) [95], wagon wheel fibers [96], U-shaped fibers [97,98], D-shaped fibers [99], and FBGs [100], among others [101,102].
In 1978, the photonic crystal fiber (PCF) idea was initially put out. A comparable idea to 1D-PC was to clad a fiber core with BG. A 2D-PC with an air core-based PCF was previously suggested in 1992, and it was disclosed at the Optical Fiber Conference (OFC) in 1996. Figure 6 summarizes the evolution of PCF. Like a standard OF, PCFs include a core and cladding, but they also have periodic air-holes in the cladding area that control light transmission. By adjusting the air hole geometries and ring counts, it is feasible to control how light propagates. Recently, the researchers analyzed the pattern of the E-field in a straightforward 2D PCF structure to analyze the sensing of malignant cells. Human immortalized normal oral keratinocyte, which belongs to the category of normal cells, and YD-10B cells, which are malignant, were both regarded to be clusters of cell lines [103]. A new study used an SPR-based PCF biosensor construction to look at early cancer cell detection [104]. Both spectral interrogation and amplitude techniques are used to identify the RI variations of cancer cells. Based on the difference in RI between healthy and malignant blood cells, a twin-core PCF is suggested for the early diagnosis of blood cancer [105]. The middle air hole has been penetrated by the samples. The suggested biosensor's changes in coupling length and transmitted spectrum for normal and cancerous cells have been studied. For the identification of cancer cells in the cervical, breast, and basal regions, dual-core PCFs have been proposed [106,107].
PCF-based SPR sensors are more effective in SPR sensing applications thanks to their benefits of compactness, high S, and multi-parameter analysis [109]. Nevertheless, there are currently two main issues with PCF-based SPR sensors. The first issue is the challenging fabrication process, which includes metal coating and analyte loading. These sensors have very tiny holes, often on the order of micrometers [109]. As a result, loading them with an aqueous analyte within the required limits and evenly covering them with a metal layer is challenging. The limited RI region of the sensor detection, caused by either using a low RI or high RI PCF-SPR sensors, impedes the ability to utilize for the substitution of the analyte [110]. An H-shaped SPR sensor established on PCF is presented for sensing a wide RI range, which may be either higher or lower than the RI of the fiber material utilized [111] as shown in Figure 7a. In contrast to previous models, the H-shaped PCF grooves, which serve as the sensing channels, are treated with gold film before being introduced into direct contact with the analyte. This decreases the complexities of manufacturing and increases reuse capacity. The cross-sectional view of the SPR sensor is shown in Figure 7b. According to numerical data, the sensor can operate normally in the vast analyte RI range of 1.33 to 1.49, and it can attain its high S of 25,900 nm/RIU at the RI range of 1.47 to 1.48. Additionally the sensor exhibits high stability within tolerances of 10% of the gold-film thickness [111]. The experimental setup that can be used to characterize the sensor is shown in Figure 7c. Table 2 presents some recent works on OF-based sensors for several sensing applications.

4. Photonic Crystal-Based Sensors

PCs are formations with a periodic fluctuation in one, two, or all three orthogonal directions of the dielectric constant (RI). The three types are referred to as one (1D), two (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) PCs, respectively. Multilayer architectures, or 1D-PCs, have undergone extensive study and have been documented in the literature [125]. They are made of two materials with differing refractive indices that are alternately layered, resulting in a RI that periodically varies in one direction but is homogenous in the other two. When the RI varies in two directions but not the third, the crystal is said to be a 2D-PCs [126,127,128]. This may be done by arranging cylinders of any dielectric material in the air or by drilling holes with triangular or square symmetry in a substance with a high RI. The RI of 3D-PCs is altered in all three spatial directions, for example, by stacking spheres of a dielectric substance in the air [129]. The schematic of the 1D, 2D, and 3D PC formations is shown in Figure 8.
Concerning the CMOS-compatible silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology, the advancement, and integration of microfluidic and photonic innovation and technology for the improvement of sensing performance in terms of S, limit-of-detection (LOD), and detection multiplexing potential [130,131]. Over the past 10 years, photonic sensors have been the focus of many studies, particularly for the recognition of a wide range of biological and chemical substances. Since they are anticipated to have higher S and selectivity in addition to high stability, immunity to EM interference, and quality enhancement, like smaller integration sizes and lower costs, photonic lab-on-a-chip systems represent the latest in photonic sensing in this perspective. Designing photonic sensors makes extensive use of PCs. By monitoring optical properties like the spectral trend of reflected and transmitted power, one can detect any physical processes, such as temperature, pressure, strain, and the occurrence of chemicals and biomolecules that can change the periodicity and RI of the formation of the PC [132].
PCs have excellent optical properties that restrict light to a very tiny volume, making it possible to identify chemical species with nanometer-sized molecules [133]. Additionally, very good efficiency in ultra-compact sensor chips may be produced by integrating modern chemical surface functionalization processes with microfluidic devices. For instance, functionalized slotted-PC cavities with integrated microfluidics have been used in experiments to determine soluble avidin concentrations as low as 15 nM or 1 m/ml [134]. A LOD of less than 20 pM for anti-biotin, which equates to less than 4.5 fg of bound material on the sensor surface and fewer than 80 molecules in the modal volume of the integrated microcavity, has been experimentally proved to have extremely high efficiency [135]. For diagnosing malaria, a linear W/G with a nanocavity-based 2D-PC-based biosensor was suggested [136]. The changes in the transmission peak are studied at a wavelength of 1550 nm using a red blood cell (RBC) sample confined inside a nanocavity. A W/G-based 2D-PC RR-based biosensor for diagnosing malaria is suggested. Utilizing a transmission peak at a wavelength of 2.07 microns, this sensor may identify infections [137].
From a technical perspective, PC-based photonic sensors, such as integrated planar PCs and PC fibers, are appropriate for multiplexing and label-free detection. For instance, large-scale chip-integrated PC sensor microarrays for biosensing on an SOI-based framework have previously been suggested and proven [131]. The creation of PCs often uses conventional and CMOS-compatible industrial techniques, such as E-beam lithography, inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching, and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), enabling these sensors appropriate for mass-market and low-cost production. Ultimately, PC fibers may be produced quickly by stacking silica glass rods and tubes into a massive structure that has the desired pattern of holes. Since several poisonous gases (including CO2, CH4, and CO) display absorption lines in the mid-infrared wavelength region, gas sensors constructed on PC are proposed [138]. A PC air-slot cavity-based high-precision gas index sensor with S=510 nm/RIU has been suggested [139]. A high S=3200 nm/RIU SPR nanocavity antenna array is suggested for gas sensing applications [140]. It is stated to have a guided-mode resonance gas sensor with an S=748 nm/RIU [141]. A PC/Ag/graphene (Gr) architecture with an S of 1178.6 nm/RIU that functions as a RI sensor established on the Tamm state are suggested [142]. Some of the recent works on PC-based sensors are presented in Table 3.
It is suggested to use near-field optical trapping and light-scattering methods to analyze free-solution interactions between a single influenza virus and certain antibodies at the single particle level [156]. By examining how the virus's Brownian fluctuations have changed, it is possible to determine how many antibodies are binding to an optically imprisoned influenza virus. The enlarged size of the virus brought on by antibodies attaching to the viral membrane is calculated using an analytical model. Anti-flu antibodies' stoichiometric values for binding to an H1N1 influenza virus are shown to be 26 ±4 (6.8 ±1.1 attogram). The nanophotonic tweezer can tackle molecules with a diameter of tens to thousands of nanometers, hence this method may be used for a variety of chemical interactions. The particle is optically trapped by using a PC cavity, as shown in Figure 9a [156]. Due to their powerful light confinement, PCs make an appealing sensing platform. PCs can be made to localize the E-field in the low RI region, which renders the sensors incredibly sensitive to a small RI change caused by bio-molecule immobilization on the pore walls. This contrasts with many sensing platforms that rely on the interaction between the small evanescent tail of the EM-field and the analyte. Point defects can draw defect states down from the air band or up from the substrate band when they are included in a PC. The resultant optical spectrum displays sharp transmission peaks inside the bandgap, and these peaks' exact locations are governed by the pores' refractive indices. The E-field confinement in the cavity is shown in Figure 9b [156]. The 3D model of the integrated optofluidic device is shown in Figure 9c [156].
Although recognition-mediated detection of viruses or simulants under flow has been theorized, it has not yet been shown using 2D-slab PC sensors. A novel W1 W/G-coupled 2D slab-PC sensor with a shape ideally suited to virus detection is designed and optimized in [157]. As this shape was estimated to create a transmission dip at the resonance wavelength that was neither too broad nor too shallow, the large-hole defects were placed either 4 rows or 5 rows distant from the W1 W/G as shown in Figure 9d and Figure 9e, respectively. The H-field and E-field distributions are taken at the resonant wavelength in the PC sensor as shown in Figure 9f–h [157]. The sensor was proven to be capable of responding to the penetration of a single particle in both air and beneath an aqueous cover layer during proof-of-concept tests using fluorescent latex particles. The capability of the device to identify virus-sized particles under flow via a recognition-mediated mechanism was validated in further studies using antibody-functionalized sensors and viral simulants. The groundwork for the integration of 2D slab-PC sensors into fully integrated photonic sensor systems is laid out in [157].
A 2D-PC microcavity biosensor with extreme S is presented in [158]. The structure shown in Figure 9i is made up of a 400 nm-thick silicon slab segregated from the Si substrate by 1 micron of silica layer, which effectively confines the transmission modes vertically. The PC has a pore diameter of 270 nm and a lattice constant of 465 nm. The central pore diameter is decreased to 140 nm to reveal the defect. The sensor functions close to its resonance at 1.58 microns and is constructed on an SOI wafer. Different amounts of resonance redshift are produced when proteins of various sizes are applied to the sensor's interior surface. The current technology may detect a molecular monolayer with a total mass as tiny as 2.5 fg. The device's functioning is confirmed by detecting the redshift associated with the binding of glutaraldehyde and bovine serum albumin. The theoretical predictions and ellipsometric measurements made on a flat oxidized silicon wafer surface are well supported by the experimental findings [158].
The fluid sensing application is presented for a dielectric PC device [24]. Focused ion-beam milling lithography is utilized to build the suggested nanosensor device, which is made of low-cost dielectric materials including SiO2 and Nb2O5. The instrument is evaluated quantitatively as a sensor for the range of biological refractive indices from 1.33 to 1.4. Following the manufacturing outcomes, the performance aspects of the biosensor device are investigated for 12 alternative structural profiles. It is demonstrated that the angular-wall-profile of the manufactured structures degrades the sensor's performance and that the ideal value of hole depth should fall between 930 and 1500 nm to achieve optimal functioning. For the device's ideal design, an S of 185.117 nm/RIU and a FOM of 9.7 were obtained. Due to its inert material features, reliable construction, and simple integration with fiber-optic setups, the device is advocated for several biosensing applications. Figure 10a,b show the SEM images of the cross-section and top view of the manufactured device. Figure 10c depicts the sensing apparatus's numerical model. As the RI of the upper cladding of the device increases, the transmission spectrum performs a redshift as shown in Figure 10d [24].

5. Metasurface-Based Sensors

Due to their exceptional EM properties, metamaterials have generated great interest during the past 20 years [159,160,161,162]. Metamaterials, such as negative-index media [163], zero-index materials [164], and ultra-high-index materials [165], are arrays of specially structured scattering components that have been systematically created. MS, the two-dimensional equivalent of metamaterials, is significantly simpler to create and use [166,167]. It can demonstrate the incredible ability to manipulate EM wavefronts, which is primarily brought about by the interaction of an EM wave with these meta-atom constructions and their functional configurations. It has been suggested that biosensing and chemical detection are two applications for metamaterial-based sensors. These have been studied in the optical and microwave domains. The S of the sensor will also enhance by making use of the plasmon-induced transparency [168,169,170].
Modern contemporary science and technology applications require the MS's transient response; however, traditional MS has limitations on its functioning in terms of tunability and customization. Typical MSs offer static, predetermined optical functionalities that are typically controlled by the configuration, shape, and topology of meta-atoms. Scientists have been focusing on creating flexible and reconfigurable MSs recently, where the meta-atoms' size, form, and placementay be tweaked or changed in response to outside signals [171]. In addition, a significant number of investigators are constantly working to access reprogrammable MS and multi-purpose MSs [169,172,173].
In our earlier work, we thoroughly analyzed the sensing properties of a hybrid metasurface perfect absorber (HMSPA) established on square meta-atoms and hollow square meta-atoms [173]. Both designs are suitable for filtering operations since they can deliver >90% absorption in the narrowband area. In comparison to a square meta-atom, the HMSPA with a hollow square meta-atom is far more sensitive to minute changes in the RI of the surrounding medium, making it the perfect choice for biosensing applications. The hollow square meta-atom may increase the S of the square meta-atom-based HMSPA from 135 nm/RIU to 355 nm/RIU. Additionally, using the suggested device for thermal sensing is made possible by placing a material that measures temperature on the surface of the MS. The hollow square meta-atom-based HMSPA has a temperature S of 0.18 nm/oC over the temperature range of 20 °C to 60 °C, thanks to the exceptional thermo-optic coefficient of PDMS. With their simplicity in device manufacturing and strengths in light coupling, the suggested HMSPA constructions have the potential to be beneficial for filtering, biosensing, and temperature-sensing purposes [173]. The square meta-atom-based HMSPA and the TRA graph are illustrated in Figure 11a and Figure 11b, respectively. The E-field and H-field distribution at the resonant wavelength is shown in Figure 11c–f and Figure 11g, respectively.
For terahertz detection and slow light purposes, a simple graphene MS with a continuous and truncated Gr strip is constructed and studied [174] as shown in Figure 11h,i. The findings show that destructive interference between bright and dark modes might result in plasmonic-induced transparency on the Gr MS. The Fermi level efficiently tunes the optical response's transmission, reflectivity, and absorbance spectra. The polarization angle of the linearly polarized plane light is another factor that may be used to modify the plasmonic-induced transparency window. Interestingly, the suggested Gr MS exhibits interesting optical applications, including sensing and slow light, due to the surface plasmon's field increase and significant dispersion. For sensing attributes, the S, and Figure of Merit (FOM) may be up to 0.7928 THz/RIU and 8.12, respectively [174]. The suggested Gr-based MS might thus be anticipated to play a significant role in slow light devices and micro-nano optical sensing. In Figure 11j, the optical transmission pattern is shown as a black line when the Gr strip is shortened. The incident wave can effectively excite the truncated Gr strip, which can then function as a brilliant mode. When there is only a continuous Gr strip, the solid red line represents the optical transmission spectrum. The continuous Gr strip can function as a dark mode and cannot be effectively stimulated. When two Gr strips are present (Figure 11j), the solid blue line displays a plasmonic-induced transparency window. A peak is created in the bright mode's spectrum thanks to the involvement of the dark mode, and two troughs are simultaneously produced in the plasmonic-induced transparency spectrum. Consequently, the plasmonic-induced transparency spectrum displays three transmittance bands. Under the excitation of the incident wave, the physical mechanism that causes the destructive interference effect is the interplay of two modes [174]. The E- field distribution diagram is then used to confirm that the analysis presented above is accurate. According to Figure 11k, the left and right sides of the truncated Gr strip have large concentrations of electrons, creating a powerful E-field. This shows that the incident wave immediately excites the truncated Gr strip. Many electrons are collected between two Gr strips in Figure 11l, which results in powerful E-fields. As a result, when the truncated Gr strip is inserted, the continuous Gr strip will be stimulated. Figure 11m describes the bright-dark mode resonant coupling theoretical paradigm [174]. Table 4 enlists the novel designs of MS perfect absorbers suggested for sensing applications.

6. Plasmonic Sensors Based on Metal-Insulator-Metal Waveguide

One fascinating method used in integrated photonic sensors for the detection of chemical and biological species is Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR), which has been briefly discussed in [3]. Two distinct fundamental approaches have been put forth to implement optical sensing into planar W/Gs established on surface plasmon polaritons (SPP). The first necessitates the activation of a surface plasmon wave, while the second strategy entails the stimulation of "pure" plasmons [186]. In any event, the excited surface plasmon wave, or SPP, at the dielectric-metal interface is modified by a localized alteration of the RI close to the W/G surface, which forms the basis of the sensing concept.
From straightforward distance sensing to providing artificial vision for object identification, optical sensors are employed in a wide variety of applications [67]. The exploration of innovative nanostructures with custom functionality is one of the major problems that the current sensor industry faces. The concept of using surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) among other nanotechnologies distinguishes itself from rivals [187]. Metallic nanostructures have the potential to generate and disperse EM radiation in completely unimaginable ways. SPPs are synchronized oscillations of free electrons at the metal/dielectric contact [188,189]. Plasmonic sensors have recently shown their benefits in several fields, including chemical sensing [190], biological species [191], environmental monitoring [192], food safety [193], and medical diagnostics [194], thanks to the notable advancements achieved in micro- and nano-fabrication technology in recent years as shown in Figure 12. These sensors are notable for their distinctive qualities in biochemical studies. An SPP-based test paper for the quick identification of COVID-19 has just been made available in Japan [195]. A unique coloration is visible when COVID-19 viruses are bound to antibiotic-coated gold nanoparticles that endure resonance peak shifts. Comparable techniques are frequently used in pregnancy tests.
Comparing plasmonic sensors to those established on other platforms, such as Si photonics or OF, reveals that plasmonic sensors have a much smaller footprint and higher sensing capacities, making them very appealing and in high demand. With the assumption of achieving exceedingly integrated optical circuits due to their minor footprint, ease of incorporation, and good balance between light localization and transmission loss, SPP W/G structures, mainly MIM W/Gs, have received much consideration due to their capacity to withstand the diffraction limit of light. With an S of 235 nm/RIU, a biosensing semiconductor nanowire RI sensor has been established [201]. It has been proposed to use long-period fiber gratings as the foundation for OF RI sensors [202]. According to Xu et al., the greatest experimental S for quasi-TM RRs was 135 nm/RIU [203]. By changing the W/G thickness, it was possible to demonstrate the bulk S of 270 nm/RIU [204].
One of the fascinating subjects is sensing, and during the past, some years, numerous plasmonic sensing devices established on MIM W/Gs are investigated numerically and proposed for use in temperature, gas, and RI sensing [205,206,207,208,209,210]. The suggested designs primarily support one function (either temperature or RI detection) at a time, despite the high S of these devices. Furthermore, because of their added intricate geometric elements, it is difficult to manufacture these patterns without leaving a few nanometers of mistake. To measure the RI, a plasmonic sensor is presented that combines a RR with circular tapered dots and a MIM W/G with tapered dots [211]. The device's S is around 1295 nm/RIU, but because of the complexity of its design, even a manufacturing mistake of a few nanometers can impair the device's function. Another complex RI sensor is presented in [212] and consists of a MIM W/G with symmetric two triangle stubs connected to a circular split-ring resonator cavity. The device has an S=1500 nm/RIU [212]. Several parameters for this sensor arrangement must be carefully tuned to get the best sensing performance. With the suggested designs [213,214], a similar circumstance takes place. Although the numerical findings presented in this research look promising, the actual difficulty arises during the manufacturing stage of these devices when several factors must be tuned at a nanometer scale.
Recent research has shown that MIM plasmonic W/G devices may be effectively used for temperature sensing applications when paired with thermal sensing media like ethanol or polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [215]. Zhu et al. suggested a sensor prototype with a very high S of -3.64 nm/oC that can only be utilized for temperature detection [216]. Additionally, Zhu et al. quantitatively examined a small Fano resonance temperature sensor using a sealed semi-square ring resonator made of PDMS. The sensors established on PDMS are extremely vulnerable to temperature changes because of their material's high thermo-optic coefficient. Applications that require a high level of precision for temperature monitoring may benefit from the sensor. However, the cavity design is so complicated that at least 5 to 6 variables must be tuned to provide the greatest sensing performance. The S is around -4 nm/oC [217]. This limits how flexible the manufacturing process may be. Using ethanol in a resonant cavity, Kong et al. suggested a temperature sensor with an S of 0.36 nm/oC [218]. In our previous work, a novel design of a plasmonic sensor is proposed for the simultaneous detection of temperature and analytes [215]. Figure 13 presents the different plasmonic MIM W/G sensor designs for temperature and biosensing applications.
A functional polymer called polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) has a linear relationship with the CO2 level. As a result, it is conceivable to use this material to create CO2 gas sensors. By shifting the gold nano-blocks that are cyclically stacked in the MIM W/G away from the line of symmetry, the plasmonic BG structure is asymmetrically changed [220] as shown in Figure 14a. Consequently, in conjunction with the broadband Bragg reflection, a narrowband MZI resonance dip also develops in the transmission continuum. Figure 14b shows that when the CO2 conc. rises from 0 ppm to 524 ppm, the MZI dip undergoes a blueshift. The recommended device's CO2 S is 226 pm/ppm for the 215 ppm to 434 ppm range of gas concentrations, which is considerably greater than most of the formerly proposed sensor designs. The CO2 gas conc. versus resonance wavelength graph is shown in Figure 14c. This paves the way for the realization of a single plasmonic sensor for multiple applications [220]. Table 5 highlights the noteworthy works related to MIM W/G plasmonic sensors recently proposed for several remarkable applications.

7. Concluding Remarks

Due to the growing need for sensing applications in industries including healthcare, defense, security, automotive, aerospace, the environment, and food quality control, to mention a few, photonic sensors have seen significant advancement in the last few decades [80,81,226]. Concerning the CMOS-compatible SOI technology, the development, and integration of microfluidic and photonic innovation and technological for the improvement of sensing performance in terms of S, the limit of detection (LOD), and detection multiplexing potential. Over the past few decades, photonic sensors have been the focus of many studies, particularly for the detection of a wide range of biological and chemical substances. In this regard, photonic Lab-on-a-chip systems offer cutting-edge photonic sensing because they are anticipated to have higher S and selectivity in addition to high stability, immunity to EM interference, and product advancements like relatively small assimilation scales and lower costs.
There are several uses for W/G-based optical sensors, including the label-free detection of chemical or biological analytes that precisely attach to functionalized W/G surfaces. By leveraging well-known photonic integration platforms like silicon or silicon nitride, these sensors show significant prospects for downsizing and economical mass manufacturing. The most popular types of sensor configurations are established on interferometers, such as those in the Mach-Zehnder and Young configuration [65], or on resonant components, including ring, disk, and Bragg resonators, which may be improved even more by making use of the Vernier effect [53]. These sensor designs, which enable long effective contact durations with the analyte and combine high S with a compact device footprint, are well suited for high-density integration into massively parallel arrays. Various methods for optimizing certain kinds of W/G have been reported in recent years, both for surface sensing and the detection of bulk changes in RI in the W/G cladding (homogeneous sensing). These studies, however, frequently focus on a few W/G types and geometries on a small number of material platforms, such as silicon [1], silicon nitride (Si3N4) [27], and polymers [65]. The greatest surface sensitivities across various W/G types and integration platforms cannot, therefore, be compared generically. Additionally, the majority of S assessments only take into account specified surface layers with predetermined refractive indices.
EM interference and radio frequency interference do not affect OF-based sensors. It is secure and suited for usage in harsh situations with high vibration. It is tolerant of corrosive conditions and high temperatures. Due to its high S, even minor variations in the ambient medium may be observed [70,71,72,73]. Its size and weight are both small and manageable. Large bandwidth and a broad dynamic range are provided. Both multiplexing and remote sensing functions are available. It has several sensing applications, including mechanical measurement, electric measurement, magnetic measurement, chemical and biological sensing, among others. Nearly all physical measurements, including temperature, pressure, flow, liquid level, displacement, vibration, rotation, magnetic and electric fields, and acceleration can be determined.
MSs are emerging study areas now because of their peculiar and highly controllable light scattering in ultracompact volume characteristics. The geometric dimensions of each meta-atom, a key MS component, and their subwavelength spacing determine how well MSs perform [168,169,170]. Meta-atoms are made up of one or more subwavelength nanostructures made of high-index dielectrics or noble metals. They are designed to display the appropriate effective local optical responses, which may be described in terms of electric and magnetic polarizabilities as well as amplitude and phase. Exotic functions with several possible uses, including transmission, virtually perfect absorption, and negative RI, have been identified. RI bio-sensing is the most practical and illustrative of the potential uses, which also include superlens, slow light, and cloaking devices. Changes in refractive indices are caused by bio-molecular interactions in the analyte layers [176]. To be an essential component of diverse chemical and biological sensing technologies, the RI sensor must provide distinct capabilities for sensitive and label-free biochemical experiments [175].
PCs offer an exciting method for achieving excellence in sensing applications. Since many photonic designs have been extensively studied and used in photonic sensing, PCs show strong optical confinement of light to a very tiny volume, permitting the detection of chemical species with nanometer-scale dimensions. Additionally, very effective ultra-compact sensor chips may be produced by integrating modern chemical surface functionalization processes with microfluidic devices. From a technical perspective, PC-based photonic sensors, such as integrated planar PCs and PCFs, are appropriate for multiplexing and label-free detection. For instance, large-scale chip-integrated PC sensor microarrays for biosensing on an SOI-based framework have recently been suggested and proven [131]. PCs are typically manufactured using conventional and CMOS-compatible technical techniques, such as E-beam lithography, ICP etching, and PECVD, rendering these sensors appropriate for mass-market and low-cost manufacturing. Ultimately, PCFs may be produced quickly by stacking silica glass rods and tubes into a huge structure that has the desired pattern of holes.
Because of its adaptable on-chip inclusion, little bending loss, increased propagation length, subwavelength confinement, and relative simplicity of manufacturing, plasmonic MIM W/Gs formed on SPPs are thoroughly explored as a potential area of optical W/Gs [211]. Due to the demand for ultrahigh-S biological sensors, plasmonic RI sensors produced on MIM W/Gs have attracted a lot of awareness [3]. Compared to more conventional approaches like fluorescence analysis, sensors established on the SPP phenomenon are more analyte-compliant and don't need additional processing steps, such as labeling [193]. The usage of SPPs has also attracted significant consideration in the field of optical sensing since its initial gas sensing demonstration. Plasmonic sensors made possible by MIM W/Gs may be used for a variety of tasks, including the detection of temperature, pressure, and RI. There are several applications for RI sensors in the biological sciences. For instance, monitoring changes in the RI makes it possible to determine the solution conc. and pH level [223,234].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.B. G.S.V. and S.N.K.; methodology, M.A.B.; software, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; validation, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; formal analysis, M.A.B., S.N.K., E.P. G., and N.L.K.; investigation, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; resources, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; data curation, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; writing—review and editing, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; visualization, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; supervision, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; project administration, M.A.B., R.V.K., S.N.K. and N.L.K.; funding acquisition, M.A.B., S.N.K. and N.L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding information is available at this time.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the constant support of the other team members in the completion of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Waveguide=W/G; Electromagnetic=EM; Silicon on Insulator=SOI; Surface plasmon resonance=SPR; Surface plasmon polariton=SPP; Ring resonator=RR; Polydimethylsiloxane=PDMS; Metal-insulator-metal=MIM; Photonic crystal=PC; Refractive index=RI; Sensitivity=S; Limit of detection=LOD; Plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition=PECVD; Inductively coupled plasma=ICP; Photoplethysmography=PPG; Polyhexamethylene biguanide=PHMB; Single mode fiber=SMF; Multimode fiber=MMF; Photonic crystal fiber= PCF; Metasurface=MS; Figure of Merit= FOM; Graphene=Gr; Bragg grating=BG.

References

  1. Tan, Y.; Dai, D. Silicon microring resonators. J. Opt. 2018, 20, 054004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. A Butt, M.; Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L. A highly sensitive design of subwavelength grating double-slot waveguide microring resonator. Laser Phys. Lett. 2020, 17, 076201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Homola, J. Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Detection of Chemical and Biological Species. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 462–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Badri, S.H.; Gilarlue, M.M.; Farkoush, S.G.; Rhee, S.B. Reconfigurable bandpass optical filters based on subwavelength grating waveguides with a Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 cavity. JOSA B 2021, 38, 1283–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L. Plasmonic refractive index sensor based on metal–insulator-metal waveguides with high sensitivity. J. Mod. Opt. 2019, 66, 1038–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Danaie, M.; Kiani, B. Design of a label-free photonic crystal refractive index sensor for biomedical applications. Photon- Nanostructures - Fundam. Appl. 2018, 31, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panda, A.; Devi, P.P. Photonic crystal biosensor for refractive index based cancerous cell detection. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2020, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Derbali, J.; AbdelMalek, F.; Obayya, S.S.A.; Bouchriha, H.; Letizia, R. Design of a compact photonic crystal sensor. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2010, 42, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vijayalakshmi, D.; Manimegalai, C.T.; Ayyanar, N.; Nguyen, T.K.; Kalimuthu, K. Highly sensitive tri-path photonic crystal fiber plasmonic sensor based on hybrid layer of gold/platinum diselenide. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Islam, M.R.; Iftekher, A.N.M.; Hasan, K.R.; Nayen, J.; Bin Islam, S.; Hossain, A.; Mustafa, Z.; Tahsin, T. Design and numerical analysis of a gold-coated photonic crystal fiber based refractive index sensor. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cooper, M.A. Label-free screening of bio-molecular interactions. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Anker, J.N.; Hall, W.P.; Lyandres, O.; Shah, N.C.; Zhao, J.; Van Duyne, R.P. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 442–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vollmer, F.; Arnold, S. Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Daniels, J.S.; Pourmand, N. Label-Free Impedance Biosensors: Opportunities and Challenges. Electroanalysis 2007, 19, 1239–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Länge, K.; Rapp, B.E.; Rapp, M. Surface acoustic wave biosensors: a review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mandal, S.; Goddard, J.M.; Erickson, D. A multiplexed optofluidic biomolecular sensor for low mass detection. Lab A Chip 2009, 9, 2924–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Martin, A.L.; Armani, D.K.; Yang, L.; Vahala, K.J. Replica-molded high-Q polymer microresonators. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 533–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Myers, F.B.; Lee, L.P. Innovations in optical microfluidic technologies for point-of-care diagnostics. Lab Chip 2008, 8, 2015–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L. Hybrid plasmonic waveguide-assisted Metal–Insulator–Metal ring resonator for refractive index sensing. J. Mod. Opt. 2018, 65, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mancuso, M.; Goddard, J.M.; Erickson, D. Nanoporous polymer ring resonators for biosensing. Opt. Express 2011, 20, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chiavaioli, F.; Baldini, F.; Tombelli, S.; Trono, C.; Giannetti, A. Biosensing with optical fiber gratings. Nanophotonics 2017, 6, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rodionov, S.; Remnev, M.; Klimov, V. Refractive index sensor based on all-dielectric gradient metasurface. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2019, 22, 100263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. https://spie.org/news/wearable-photonics?SSO=1".
  24. Khan, Y.; Butt, M.A.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N. Numerical Study of Fabrication-Related Effects of the Structural-Profile on the Performance of a Dielectric Photonic Crystal-Based Fluid Sensor. Materials 2022, 15, 3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ouyang, Q.; Zeng, S.; Jiang, L.; Hong, L.; Xu, G.; Dinh, X.-Q.; Qian, J.; He, S.; Qu, J.; Coquet, P.; et al. Sensitivity Enhancement of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides/Silicon Nanostructure-based Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Butt, M.A. , Nguyen, H.D., Ródenas, A., Romero, C., Moreno, P., de Aldana, J.R.V., Aguiló, M., Solé, R.M., Pujol, M.C. and Díaz, F. Low-repetition rate femtosecond laser writing of optical waveguides in KTP crystals: analysis of anisotropic refractive index changes. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 15343–15355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Belt, M.; Bovington, J.; Moreira, R.; Bauters, J.F.; Heck, M.J.R.; Barton, J.S.; Bowers, J.E.; Blumenthal, D.J. Sidewall gratings in ultra-low-loss Si_3N_4 planar waveguides. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Albert, J.; Lit, J.W.Y. Full modeling of field-assisted ion exchange for graded index buried channel optical waveguides. Appl. Opt. 1990, 29, 2798–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Butt, M.A. , Khonina, S.N. and Kazanskiy, N.L. Modelling of Rib channel waveguides based on silicon-on-sapphire at 4.67 μm wavelength for evanescent field gas absorption sensor. Optik 2018, 168, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L. Silicon on silicon dioxide slot waveguide evanescent field gas absorption sensor. J. Mod. Opt. 2017, 65, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kazanskiy, N.L.; Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N. Optical Computing: Status and Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zwerver, A.M.J.; Krähenmann, T.; Watson, T.F.; Lampert, L.; George, H.C.; Pillarisetty, R.; Bojarski, S.A.; Amin, P.; Amitonov, S.V.; Boter, J.M.; et al. Qubits made by advanced semiconductor manufacturing. Nat. Electron. 2022, 5, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alexoudi, T.; Kanellos, G.T.; Pleros, N. Optical RAM and integrated optical memories: a survey. Light. Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Washburn, A.L. and Bailey, R.C. Photonics-on-a-chip: recent advances in integrated waveguides as enabling detection elements for real-world, lab-on-a-chip biosensing applications. Analyst 2011, 136, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tai, H. , Tanaka, H. and Yoshino, T. Fiber-optic evanescent-wave methane-gas sensor using optical absorption for the 3.392-μm line of a He–Ne laser. Optics letters 1987, 12, 437–439. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sekimoto, S.; Nakagawa, H.; Okazaki, S.; Fukuda, K.; Asakura, S.; Shigemori, T.; Takahashi, S. A fiber-optic evanescent-wave hydrogen gas sensor using palladium-supported tungsten oxide. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2000, 66, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, Y. , Kalyoncu, S. K., Zhao, Q., Torun, R. and Boyraz, O. Silicon-on-sapphire waveguides design for mid-IR evanescent field absorption gas sensors. Optics Communications 2014, 313, 186–194. [Google Scholar]
  38. Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Butt, M.A. Evanescent Field Ratio Enhancement of a Modified Ridge Waveguide Structure for Methane Gas Sensing Application. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 8469–8476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kazanskiy, N.L. , Butt, M. A. and Kaźmierczak, A. Why slot and hybrid plasmonic waveguides are ideal candidates for sensing applications?. Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials Rapid Communications 2021, 15, 195–206. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pelli, S.; Righini, G.C.; Scaglione, A.; Guglielmi, M.; Martucci, A. Direct laser writing of ridge optical waveguides in silica-titania glass sol-gel films. Opt. Mater. 1996, 5, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Butt, M.A. , Khonina, S. N. and Kazanskiy, N.L.. Ultrashort inverted tapered silicon ridge-to-slot waveguide coupler at 1.55 µm and 3.392 µm wavelength. Applied Optics 2020, 59, 7821–7828. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tayoub, H.; Hocini, A.; Harhouz, A. HIGH-SENSITIVE MID-INFRARED PHOTONIC CRYSTAL SENSOR USING SLOTTED-WAVEGUIDE COUPLED-CAVITY. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 2021, 105, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yuan, D.; Dong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, T. Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Biochemical Sensor Based on Silicon-on-Insulator Rib Waveguide with Large Cross Section. Sensors 2015, 15, 21500–21517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Heinsalu, S.; Isogai, Y.; Matsushima, Y.; Ishikawa, H.; Utaka, K. Record-high sensitivity compact multi-slot sub-wavelength Bragg grating refractive index sensor on SOI platform. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 28126–28139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Prabhathan, P.; Murukeshan, V.M.; Jing, Z.; Ramana, P.V. Compact SOI nanowire refractive index sensor using phase shifted Bragg grating. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 15330–15341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kehl, F. , Bischof, D. , Michler, M., Keka, M. and Stanley, R. Design of a label-free, distributed Bragg grating resonator based dielectric waveguide biosensor. Photonics 2015, 2, 124–138. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sahu, S.; Ali, J.; Singh, G. Refractive index biosensor using sidewall gratings in dual-slot waveguide. Opt. Commun. 2017, 402, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, L.; Hu, Z.; Ye, M.; Yu, Z.; Ma, C.; Li, J. On-Chip Refractive Index Sensor With Ultra-High Sensitivity Based on Sub-Wavelength Grating Racetrack Microring Resonators and Vernier Effect. IEEE Photon- J. 2022, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. De Leonardis, F.; Campanella, C.E.; Troia, B.; Perri, A.G.; Passaro, V.M.N. Performance of SOI Bragg Grating Ring Resonator for Nonlinear Sensing Applications. Sensors 2014, 14, 16017–16034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, C.Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.M. Compact SOI optimized slot microring coupled phase-shifted Bragg grating resonator for sensing. Opt. Commun. 2018, 414, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guider, R. , Gandolfi, D. , Chalyan, T., Pasquardini, L., Samusenko, A., Pederzolli, C., Pucker, G. and Pavesi, L. Sensitivity and limit of detection of biosensors based on ring resonators. Sensing and bio-sensing research 2015, 6, 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  52. Di Falco, A. , O’faolain, L. and Krauss, T.F. Chemical sensing in slotted photonic crystal heterostructure cavities. Applied physics letters 2009, 94, 063503. [Google Scholar]
  53. Claes, T.; Bogaerts, W.; Bienstman, P. Experimental characterization of a silicon photonic biosensor consisting of two cascaded ring resonators based on the Vernier-effect and introduction of a curve fitting method for an improved detection limit. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 22747–22761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chow, E.; Grot, A.; Mirkarimi, L.W.; Sigalas, M.; Girolami, G. Ultracompact biochemical sensor built with two-dimensional photonic crystal microcavity. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 1093–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Butt, M.A. , Khonina, S. N. and Kazanskiy, N.L. Device performance of standard strip, slot and hybrid plasmonic μ-ring resonator: a comparative study. Waves in Random and Complex Media 2021, 31, 2397–2406. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mirsadeghi, S.H.; Schelew, E.; Young, J.F. Photonic crystal slot-microcavity circuit implemented in silicon-on-insulator: High Q operation in solvent without undercutting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Carlborg, C.F.; Gylfason, K.B.; Kaźmierczak, A.; Dortu, F.; Polo, M.J.B.; Catala, A.M.; Kresbach, G.M.; Sohlström, H.; Moh, T.; Vivien, L.; et al. A packaged optical slot-waveguide ring resonator sensor array for multiplex label-free assays in labs-on-chips. Lab A Chip 2009, 10, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Claes, T.; Molera, J.G.; De Vos, K.; Schacht, E.; Baets, R.; Bienstman, P. Label-Free Biosensing With a Slot-Waveguide-Based Ring Resonator in Silicon on Insulator. IEEE Photon- J. 2009, 1, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xing, P.; Viegas, J. Broadband CMOS-compatible SOI temperature insensitive Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 24098–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, C.; Yi, P.; Li, J.; Dong, H.; Chen, C.; Zhang, D.; Shen, H.; Fu, B. Polymer Optical Waveguide Grating-Based Biosensor to Detect Effective Drug Concentrations of Ginkgolide A for Inhibition of PMVEC Apoptosis. Biosensors 2021, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, X.; Xu, Z.; Lu, N.; Zhu, J.; Jin, G. Ultracompact refractive index sensor based on microcavity in the sandwiched photonic crystal waveguide structure. Opt. Commun. 2008, 281, 1725–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hiltunen, M.; Hiltunen, J.; Stenberg, P.; Aikio, S.; Kurki, L.; Vahimaa, P.; Karioja, P. Polymeric slot waveguide interferometer for sensor applications. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 7229–7237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, L.; Tian, H.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, P.; Ji, Y. Label-free optical sensor by designing a high-Q photonic crystal ring–slot structure. Opt. Commun. 2014, 335, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Butt, M.A.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N. Modal Characteristics of Refractive Index Engineered Hybrid Plasmonic Waveguide. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 9779–9786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ahmadi, L.; Hiltunen, M.; Stenberg, P.; Hiltunen, J.; Aikio, S.; Roussey, M.; Saarinen, J.; Honkanen, S. Hybrid layered polymer slot waveguide Young interferometer. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 10275–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, C.Y.; Chen, P.Y.; Zhang, L. Numerical analysis of effective refractive index sensor based on slot micro-ring and Bragg grating. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2019, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Butt, M.; Khonina, S.; Kazanskiy, N. Plasmonics: A Necessity in the Field of Sensing-A Review (Invited). Fiber Integr. Opt. 2021, 40, 14–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mowbray, S.E.; Amiri, A.M. A Brief Overview of Medical Fiber Optic Biosensors and Techniques in the Modification for Enhanced Sensing Ability. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Anderson, G.P.; King, K.D.; Gaffney, K.L.; Johnson, L.H. Multi-analyte interrogation using the fiber optic biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2000, 14, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Butt, M.A.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N. Label-free detection of ambient refractive index based on plasmonic Bragg gratings embedded resonator cavity sensor. J. Mod. Opt. 2019, 66, 1920–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Binfeng, Y.; Guohua, H.; Ruohu, Z.; Yiping, C. Design of a compact and high sensitive refractive index sensor base on metal-insulator-metal plasmonic Bragg grating. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 28662–28670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Passaro, V.M.N.; Loiacono, R.; D'Amico, G.; De Leonardis, F. Design of Bragg Grating Sensors Based on Submicrometer Optical Rib Waveguides in SOI. IEEE Sens. J. 2008, 8, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Klimov, N.N.; Mittal, S.; Berger, M.; Ahmed, Z. On-chip silicon waveguide Bragg grating photonic temperature sensor. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 3934–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hill, K.; Meltz, G. Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview. J. Light. Technol. 1997, 15, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hill, K.O.; Fujii, Y.; Johnson, D.C.; Kawasaki, B.S. Photosensitivity in optical fiber waveguides: Application to reflection filter fabrication. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1978, 32, 647–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kersey, A.D. , Davis, M. A., Patrick, H.J., LeBlanc, M., Koo, K.P., Askins, C.G., Putnam, M.A. and Friebele, E.J. Fiber grating sensors. Journal of lightwave technology 1997, 15, 442–1463. [Google Scholar]
  77. H. Alemohammad, R. H. Alemohammad, R. Liang, D. Yilman, A. Azhari, K. Mathers, C. Chang, B. Chan and M. Pope, "Fiber optic sensors for harsh environments: Environmental, hydrogeological, and chemical sensing applications," in 26th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, Lausanne Switzerland, 24-. 28 September.
  78. Qiao, X.; Shao, Z.; Bao, W.; Rong, Q. Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for the Oil Industry. Sensors 2017, 17, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. H. Linzi, Z. H. Linzi, Z. Wu, X. Zhang, F. Qiangqiang, X. Jian, T. Yong, G. Tuan and G. Bai-Ou, "High sensitive thrombin protein detection by plasmonic tilted fiber grating biosensor," in Proceedings of the Workshop on Specialty Optical Fibers and their applications, Hong Kong, China, 4-. 6 November.
  80. Arghir, I.; Spasic, D.; Verlinden, B.E.; Delport, F.; Lammertyn, J. Improved surface plasmon resonance biosensing using silanized optical fibers. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2015, 216, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Coelho, L.; de Almeida, J.M.M.M.; Santos, J.L.; Jorge, P.A.d.S.; Martins, M.C.L.; Viegas, D.; Queirós, R.B. Aptamer-based fiber sensor for thrombin detection. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016, 21, 087005–087005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhou, Z.; Xu, Y.; Qiao, C.; Liu, L.; Jia, Y. A novel low-cost gas sensor for CO2 detection using polymer-coated fiber Bragg grating. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2021, 332, 129482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, Y.; Lu, P.; Gao, S.; Xiang, D.; Mihailov, S.; Bao, X. Optical fiber random grating-based multiparameter sensor. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 5514–5517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Maaskant, R.; Alavie, T.; Measures, R.; Tadros, G.; Rizkalla, S.; Guha-Thakurta, A. Fiber-optic Bragg grating sensors for bridge monitoring. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1997, 19, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kretschmann, E. and Raether, H. Radiative decay of non radiative surface plasmons excited by light. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 1968, 23, 2135–2136. [Google Scholar]
  86. Otto, A. Excitation of nonradiative surface plasma waves in silver by the method of frustrated total reflection. Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and nuclei 1968, 216, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pevec, S.; Donlagic, D. Miniature fiber-optic Fabry-Perot refractive index sensor for gas sensing with a resolution of 5x10−9 RIU. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 23868–23882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Skorobogatiy, M.; Kabashin, A.V. Photon crystal waveguide-based surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Piliarik, M.; Homola, J.; Manı́ková, Z.; Čtyroký, J. Surface plasmon resonance sensor based on a single-mode polarization-maintaining optical fiber. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2003, 90, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gupta, B.; Sharma, A.K. Sensitivity evaluation of a multi-layered surface plasmon resonance-based fiber optic sensor: a theoretical study. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2005, 107, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jorgenson, R.C.; Yee, S.S. A fiber-optic chemical sensor based on surface plasmon resonance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1993, 12, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lin, Y.-C. Comparison of Transmission-Type and Reflection-Type Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Fiber-Optic Sensor. 2016 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, ChinaDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 436–438.
  93. Singh, S.; Mishra, S.K.; Gupta, B.D. Sensitivity enhancement of a surface plasmon resonance based fibre optic refractive index sensor utilizing an additional layer of oxides. Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 2013, 193, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fontana, E.; Dulman, H.; Doggett, D.; Pantell, R. Surface plasmon resonance on a single mode optical fiber. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1998, 47, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mao, P.; Luo, Y.; Chen, X.; Fang, J.; Huang, H.; Chen, C.; Peng, S.; Zhang, J.; Tang, J.; Lu, H.; et al. Design and optimization of multimode fiber sensor based on surface plasmon resonance. 14th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD 2014). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, SpainDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 119–120.
  96. Hoseinian, M.S.; Bolorizadeh, M.A. Design and Simulation of a Highly Sensitive SPR Optical Fiber Sensor. Photon- Sens. 2018, 9, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xie, T.; He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y. Highly Sensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Based on Graphene-Coated U-shaped Fiber. Plasmonics 2020, 16, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Verma, R.K. and Gupta, B. D. Theoretical modelling of a bi-dimensional U-shaped surface plasmon resonance based fibre optic sensor for sensitivity enhancement. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2008, 41, 095106. [Google Scholar]
  99. Yu, H.; Chong, Y.; Zhang, P.; Ma, J.; Li, D. A D-shaped fiber SPR sensor with a composite nanostructure of MoS2-graphene for glucose detection. Talanta 2020, 219, 121324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Arasu, P.T.; Al-Qazwini, Y.; Onn, B.I.; Noor, A.S.M. Fiber Bragg grating based surface plasmon resonance sensor utilizing FDTD for alcohol detection applications. 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Photonics (ICP). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, MalaysiaDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 93–97.
  101. Kim, Y.-C.; Peng, W.; Banerji, S.; Booksh, K.S. Tapered fiber optic surface plasmon resonance sensor for analyses of vapor and liquid phases. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 2218–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Navarrete, M.-C.; Díaz-Herrera, N.; González-Cano, A.; Esteban. Surface plasmon resonance in the visible region in sensors based on tapered optical fibers. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2014, 190, 881–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Choi, W.J.; Jeon, D.I.; Ahn, S.-G.; Yoon, J.-H.; Kim, S.; Lee, B.H. Full-field optical coherence microscopy for identifying live cancer cells by quantitative measurement of refractive index distribution. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 23285–23295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yasli, A. Cancer detection with surface plasmon resonance-based photonic crystal fiber biosensor. Plasmonics 2021, 16, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mollah, A.; Yousufali; Ankan, I. M.; Rahman, M.; Sarker, H.; Chakrabarti, K. Twin core photonic crystal fiber refractive index sensor for early detection of blood cancer. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2020, 29, 100344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ayyanar, N.; Raja, G.T.; Sharma, M.; Kumar, D.S. Photonic Crystal Fiber-Based Refractive Index Sensor for Early Detection of Cancer. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 7093–7099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mishra, G.P.; Kumar, D.; Chaudhary, V.S.; Murmu, G. Cancer cell detection by a heart-shaped dual-core photonic crystal fiber sensor. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 10321–10329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Buczynski, R.J.A.P.P.S.A. Photonic crystal fibers. Acta Physica Polonica A 2004, 106, 141–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shuai, B.; Xia, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D. A multi-core holey fiber based plasmonic sensor with large detection range and high linearity. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 5974–5986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhao, L.; Han, H.; Luan, N.; Liu, J.; Song, L.; Hu, Y. A Temperature Plasmonic Sensor Based on a Side Opening Hollow Fiber Filled with High Refractive Index Sensing Medium. Sensors 2019, 19, 3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Han, H.; Hou, D.; Zhao, L.; Luan, N.; Song, L.; Liu, Z.; Lian, Y.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y. A Large Detection-Range Plasmonic Sensor Based on An H-Shaped Photonic Crystal Fiber. Sensors 2020, 20, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Li, C.; Li, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, B.; Yu, Y.; Ren, H.; Jiang, S.; Yue, W. LSPR optical fiber biosensor based on a 3D composite structure of gold nanoparticles and multilayer graphene films. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 6071–6083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Yunianto, M.; Permata, A.N.; Eka, D.; Ariningrum, D.; Wahyuningsih, S.; Marzuki, A. Design of a Fiber Optic Biosensor for Cholesterol Detection in Human Blood. 2017, 176, 012014. [CrossRef]
  114. Cheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.; Lei, J. High-sensitivity optical fiber temperature sensor based on a dual-loop optoelectronic oscillator with the Vernier effect. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 35264–35271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cao, H. , Li, D. , Zhou, K. and Chen, Y. Demonstration of a ZnO-nanowire-based nanograting temperature sensor. Photonic Sensors 2023, 13, 230123. [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhang, H.; Xie, Z.; Yan, H.; Li, P.; Wang, P.; Han, D. High sensitivity and large measurement range magnetic field micro-nano fiber sensor based on Mach-Zehnder interference. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Selvendran, S.; Susheel, A.; Tarun, P.V.; Muthu, K.E.; Raja, A.S. A novel surface plasmon based photonic crystal fiber sensor. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020, 52, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Melo, A.A.; Santiago, M.F.; Silva, T.B.; Moreira, C.S.; Cruz, R.M. Investigation of a D-Shaped Optical Fiber Sensor with Graphene Overlay. IFAC-Pap. 2018, 51, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Tien, C.-L.; Lin, H.-Y.; Su, S.-H. High Sensitivity Refractive Index Sensor by D-Shaped Fibers and Titanium Dioxide Nanofilm. Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2018, 2018, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Larrión, B.; Hernáez, M.; Arregui, F.J.; Goicoechea, J.; Bravo, J.; Matías, I.R. Photonic Crystal Fiber Temperature Sensor Based on Quantum Dot Nanocoatings. J. Sens. 2009, 2009, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Haque, E.; Hossain, A.; Ahmed, F.; Namihira, Y. Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Based on Modified $D$ -Shaped Photonic Crystal Fiber for Wider Range of Refractive Index Detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 8287–8293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wu, T.; Shao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, S.; Cao, W.; Zhang, F.; Liao, C.; He, J.; Huang, Y.; Hou, M.; et al. Surface plasmon resonance biosensor based on gold-coated side-polished hexagonal structure photonic crystal fiber. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 20313–20322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Paul, A.K. Design and analysis of photonic crystal fiber plasmonic refractive Index sensor for condition monitoring of transformer oil. OSA Continuum 2020, 3, 2253–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shafkat, A.; Rashed, A.N.Z.; El-Hageen, H.M.; Alatwi, A.M. Design and analysis of a single elliptical channel photonic crystal fiber sensor for potential malaria detection. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2021, 98, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Shen, H.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Yang, B. One-dimensional photonic crystals: fabrication, responsiveness and emerging applications in 3D construction. RSC Adv. 2015, 6, 4505–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. A Butt, M.; Kazanskiy, N.L. Two-dimensional photonic crystal heterostructure for light steering and TM-polarization maintaining applications. Laser Phys. 2021, 31, 036201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Butt, M.; Khonina, S.; Kazanskiy, N. 2D-Photonic crystal heterostructures for the realization of compact photonic devices. Photon- Nanostructures - Fundam. Appl. 2021, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yu, S.-P.; Muniz, J.A.; Hung, C.-L.; Kimble, H.J. Two-dimensional photonic crystals for engineering atom–light interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2019, 116, 12743–12751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Chen, C.-W.; Hou, C.-T.; Li, C.-C.; Jau, H.-C.; Wang, C.-T.; Hong, C.-L.; Guo, D.-Y.; Wang, C.-Y.; Chiang, S.-P.; Bunning, T.J.; et al. Large three-dimensional photonic crystals based on monocrystalline liquid crystal blue phases. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wang, Z.; Liu, D. Special kind of photonic crystals with omnidirectional bandgaps. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2006, 23, 2601–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zu, P.; Chan, C.C.; Jin, Y.; Gong, T.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.H.; Dong, X. A Temperature-Insensitive Twist Sensor by Using Low-Birefringence Photonic-Crystal-Fiber-Based Sagnac Interferometer. IEEE Photon- Technol. Lett. 2011, 23, 920–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dinodiya, S.; Suthar, B.; Bhargava, A. Photonic crystal sensors: Physics and applications. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONDENSED MATTER AND APPLIED PHYSICS (ICC 2017). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, IndiaDATE OF CONFERENCE; p. 060016.
  133. Taverne, M.P.C.; Ho, Y.-L.D.; Zheng, X.; Chen, L.; Fang, C.-H.N.; Rarity, J. Strong light confinement in rod-connected diamond photonic crystals. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5202–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Scullion, M.; Di Falco, A.; Krauss, T. Slotted photonic crystal cavities with integrated microfluidics for biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 27, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zlatanovic, S.; Mirkarimi, L.W.; Sigalas, M.M.; Bynum, M.A.; Chow, E.; Robotti, K.M.; Burr, G.W.; Esener, S.; Grot, A. Photonic crystal microcavity sensor for ultracompact monitoring of reaction kinetics and protein concentration. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2009, 141, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sharma, V.; Kalyani, V.L. Design Two Dimensional Nanocavity Photonic Crystal Biosensor Detection in Malaria. Int. J. Emerg. Res. Manag. Technol. 2018, 6, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bendib, S. and Bendib, C. Photonic crystals for malaria detection. J. Biosens. Bioelectron 2018, 9, 1000257. [Google Scholar]
  138. Kassa-Baghdouche, L.; Cassan, E. Mid-infrared gas sensor based on high-Q/V point-defect photonic crystal nanocavities. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020, 52, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Jágerská, J.; Zhang, H.; Diao, Z.; Le Thomas, N.; Houdré, R. Refractive index sensing with an air-slot photonic crystal nanocavity. Opt. Lett. 2010, 35, 2523–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Zhao, H.-J. High sensitivity refractive index gas sensing enhanced by surface plasmon resonance with nano-cavity antenna array. Chin. Phys. B 2012, 21, 087104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, L. , Sang, T. , Li, J., Zhou, J., Wang, B. and Wang, Y. High-sensitive transmission type of gas sensor based on guided-mode resonance in coupled gratings. Journal of Modern optics 2018, 65, 1601–1608. [Google Scholar]
  142. Chen, Y.; Dong, J.; Liu, T.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, W. Refractive index sensing performance analysis of photonic crystal containing graphene based on optical Tamm state. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wang, G.; Lu, Y.; Duan, L.; Yao, J. A Refractive Index Sensor Based on PCF With Ultra-Wide Detection Range. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 2021, 27, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Singh, S.; Prajapati, Y.K. Highly sensitive refractive index sensor based on D-shaped PCF with gold-graphene layers on the polished surface. Appl. Phys. A 2019, 125, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Qin, W. , Li, S. G., Xue, J.R., Xin, X.J. and Zhang, L. Numerical analysis of a photonic crystal fiber based on two polarized modes for biosensing applications. Chinese Physics B 2013, 22, 074213. [Google Scholar]
  146. Shakya, A.K.; Singh, S. Design of dual polarized tetra core PCF based plasmonic RI sensor for visible-IR spectrum. Opt. Commun. 2020, 478, 126372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Paul, A.K.; Sarkar, A.K.; Rahman, A.B.S.; Khaleque, A. Twin Core Photonic Crystal Fiber Plasmonic Refractive Index Sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 5761–5769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Fu, Y.-L.; Deng, C.-S.; Ma, S.-S. Design and analysis of refractive index sensors based on slotted photonic crystal nanobeam cavities with sidewall gratings. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Fan, Z. Surface plasmon resonance refractive index sensor based on photonic crystal fiber covering nano-ring gold film. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2019, 50, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rifat, A.A. , Mahdiraji, G. A., Shee, Y.G., Shawon, M.J. and Adikan, F.M. A novel photonic crystal fiber biosensor using surface plasmon resonance. Procedia engineering 2016, 140, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  151. Li, D.; Zhang, W.; Liu, H.; Hu, J.; Zhou, G. High Sensitivity Refractive Index Sensor Based on Multicoating Photonic Crystal Fiber With Surface Plasmon Resonance at Near-Infrared Wavelength. IEEE Photon- J. 2017, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Otupiri, R. , Akowuah, E. K., Haxha, S., Ademgil, H., AbdelMalek, F. and Aggoun, A. A novel birefrigent photonic crystal fiber surface plasmon resonance biosensor. IEEE Photonics Journal 2014, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  153. Olyaee, S.; Najafgholinezhad, S.; Banaei, H.A. Four-channel label-free photonic crystal biosensor using nanocavity resonators. Photon- Sens. 2013, 3, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kurt, H.; Erim, M.N.; Erim, N. Various photonic crystal bio-sensor configurations based on optical surface modes. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2012, 165, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Dündar, M.A.; Ryckebosch, E.C.; Nötzel, R.; Karouta, F.; van Ijzendoorn, L.J.; van der Heijden, R.W. Sensitivities of InGaAsP photonic crystal membrane nanocavities to hole refractive index. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 4049–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kang, P.; Schein, P.; Serey, X.; O’dell, D.; Erickson, D. Nanophotonic detection of freely interacting molecules on a single influenza virus. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Baker, J.E.; Sriram, R.; Miller, B.L. Recognition-mediated particle detection under microfluidic flow with waveguide-coupled 2D photonic crystals: towards integrated photonic virus detectors. Lab A Chip 2017, 17, 1570–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lee, M.R.; Fauchet, P.M. Two-dimensional silicon photonic crystal based biosensing platform for protein detection. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 4530–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Cheng, F.; Yang, X.; Gao, J. Ultrasensitive detection and characterization of molecules with infrared plasmonic metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Lupu, A.; Dubrovina, N.; Ghasemi, R.; Degiron, A.; de Lustrac, A. Metal-dielectric metamaterials for guided wave silicon photonics. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 24746–24761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Silva, A.; Monticone, F.; Castaldi, G.; Galdi, V.; Alù, A.; Engheta, N. Performing Mathematical Operations with Metamaterials. Science 2014, 343, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhang, Y.; Tong, Y.W. An ultrathin metasurface carpet cloak based on the generalized sheet transition conditions. Opt. Commun. 2021, 483, 126590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Valentine, J.; Zhang, S.; Zentgraf, T.; Ulin-Avila, E.; Genov, D.A.; Bartal, G.; Zhang, X. Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index. Nature 2008, 455, 376–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Ziolkowski, R.W. Propagation in and scattering from a matched metamaterial having a zero index of refraction. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 70, 046608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Pimenov, A.; Loidl, A. Experimental demonstration of artificial dielectrics with a high index of refraction. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 193102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Mandal, P. Polarization insensitive plasmonic stacked multilayer metasurface with deep nanohole cavity as multi-band absorber. Optik 2021, 241, 166959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Li, Z.; Li, B.; Zhao, Q.; Zhou, J. A metasurface absorber based on the slow-wave effect. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 045311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Butt, M.A. and Kazansky, N. L. Narrowband perfect metasurface absorber based on impedance matching. Photonics letters of Poland 2020, 12, 88–90. [Google Scholar]
  169. Kazanskiy, N.L.; Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N. Carbon Dioxide Gas Sensor Based on Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Polymer Deposited on Silicon Nano-Cylinders Metasurface. Sensors 2021, 21, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, S. , Wong, C. L., Zeng, S., Bi, R., Tai, K., Dholakia, K. and Olivo, M. Metasurfaces for biomedical applications: imaging and sensing from a nanophotonics perspective. Nanophotonics 2020, 10, 259–293. [Google Scholar]
  171. Ee, H.-S.; Agarwal, R. Tunable Metasurface and Flat Optical Zoom Lens on a Stretchable Substrate. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2818–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ma, Q.; Bai, G.D.; Jing, H.B.; Yang, C.; Li, L.; Cui, T.J. Smart metasurface with self-adaptively reprogrammable functions. Light. Sci. Appl. 2019, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Butt, M.; Khonina, S.; Kazanskiy, N.; Piramidowicz, R. Hybrid metasurface perfect absorbers for temperature and biosensing applications. Opt. Mater. 2021, 123, 111906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wang, Y.; Chang, B.; Xue, J.; Cao, X.; Xu, H.; He, H.; Cui, W.; He, Z. Sensing and slow light applications based on graphene metasurface in terahertz. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 123, 108881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lu, X. Narrowband Absorption Platform Based on Graphene and Oblique Incidence in the Infrared Range. J. Light. Technol. 2020, 39, 1530–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Lan, G.; Jin, Z.; Nong, J.; Luo, P.; Guo, C.; Sang, Z.; Dong, L.; Wei, W. Narrowband Perfect Absorber Based on Dielectric-Metal Metasurface for Surface-Enhanced Infrared Sensing. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Khonina, S.N.; A Butt, M.; Kazanskiy, N.L. Numerical investigation of metasurface narrowband perfect absorber and a plasmonic sensor for a near-infrared wavelength range. J. Opt. 2021, 23, 065102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Lu, X.; Zhang, T.; Wan, R.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, C.; Guo, S. Numerical investigation of narrowband infrared absorber and sensor based on dielectric-metal metasurface. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 10179–10187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Agarwal, P.; Kishor, K.; Sinha, R.K. Ultrasensitive dual-band terahertz metasurface sensor based on all InSb resonator. Opt. Commun. 2022, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hoang, T.T.; Pham, T.S.; Nguyen, X.B.; Nguyen, H.T.; Le, K.Q.; Ngo, Q.M. High contrast and sensitive near-infrared refractive index sensors based on metal-dielectric-metal plasmonic metasurfaces. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 2021, 631, 413469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Patel, S.K.; Parmar, J. Highly sensitive and tunable refractive index biosensor based on phase change material. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 2021, 622, 413357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Shen, H.; Liu, C.; Liu, F.; Jin, Y.; Guo, B.; Wei, Z.; Wang, F.; Tan, C.; Huang, X.; Meng, H. Multi-band plasmonic absorber based on hybrid metal-graphene metasurface for refractive index sensing application. Results Phys. 2021, 23, 104020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zhang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, F. Quad-band plasmonic perfect absorber using all-metal nanostructure metasurface for refractive index sensing. Optik 2021, 229, 166300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Islam, M.; Sultana, J.; Biabanifard, M.; Vafapour, Z.; Nine, M.; Dinovitser, A.; Cordeiro, C.; Ng, B.-H.; Abbott, D. Tunable localized surface plasmon graphene metasurface for multiband superabsorption and terahertz sensing. Carbon 2019, 158, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Cheng, Y.; Chen, F.; Luo, H. Triple-Band Perfect Light Absorber Based on Hybrid Metasurface for Sensing Application. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kashyap, R.; Nemova, G. Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Fiber and Planar Waveguide Sensors. J. Sens. 2009, 2009, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Anwar, R.S.; Ning, H.; Mao, L. Recent advancements in surface plasmon polaritons-plasmonics in subwavelength structures in microwave and terahertz regimes. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2018, 4, 244–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Ahmed, K.; Jabin, A.; Paul, B.K. Surface plasmon resonance-based gold-coated biosensor for the detection of fuel adulteration. J. Comput. Electron. 2019, 19, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ahmed, K. , Haque, M. J., Jabin, M.A., Paul, B.K., Amiri, I.S. and Yupapin, P. Tetra-core surface plasmon resonance based biosensor for alcohol sensing. Physica B: Condensed Matter 2019, 570, 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  190. Stewart, M.E.; Anderton, C.R.; Thompson, L.B.; Maria, J.; Gray, S.K.; Rogers, J.A.; Nuzzo, R.G. Nanostructured Plasmonic Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 494–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Mejía-Salazar, J.R. and Oliveira Jr, O. N. Plasmonic biosensing: Focus review. Chemical reviews 2018, 118, 10617–10625. [Google Scholar]
  192. Weiss, M.N.; Srivastava, R.; Groger, H.; Lo, P.; Luo, S.-F. A theoretical investigation of environmental monitoring using surface plasmon resonance waveguide sensors. Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 1996, 51, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Balbinot, S.; Srivastav, A.M.; Vidic, J.; Abdulhalim, I.; Manzano, M. Plasmonic biosensors for food control. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 111, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wang, Z. , Chen, J. , Khan, S.A., Li, F., Shen, J., Duan, Q., Liu, X. and Zhu, J. Plasmonic metasurfaces for medical diagnosis applications: A review. Sensors 2021, 22, 133. [Google Scholar]
  195. Liu, Y.; Ma, Y. One-Dimensional Plasmonic Sensors. Front. Phys. 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. https://www.news-medical.net/health/Types-of-Telemedicine.aspx".
  197. https://www.axiomtek.com/".
  198. https://www.helsesmart.no/rontgen-thorax/".
  199. https://phys.org/news/2020-09-virus-based-colorimetric-sensor-true-airborne.html".
  200. Deng, X.; Li, L.; Enomoto, M.; Kawano, Y. Continuously Frequency-Tuneable Plasmonic Structures for Terahertz Bio-sensing and Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Wang, Y.; Gao, B.; Zhang, K.; Yuan, K.; Wan, Y.; Xie, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, Q.; Yao, L.; et al. Refractive Index Sensor Based on Leaky Resonant Scattering of Single Semiconductor Nanowire. ACS Photon- 2017, 4, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Teng, C.; Yu, F.; Ding, Y.; Zheng, J. Refractive index sensor based on multi-mode plastic optical fiber with long period grating. SPIE Optics + Optoelectronics. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, Czech RepublicDATE OF CONFERENCE; p. 102311.
  203. Xu, D.-X.; Vachon, M.; Densmore, A.; Ma, R.; Janz, S.; Delâge, A.; Lapointe, J.; Cheben, P.; Schmid, J.H.; Post, E.; et al. Real-time cancellation of temperature induced resonance shifts in SOI wire waveguide ring resonator label-free biosensor arrays. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 22867–22879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. TalebiFard, S.; Schmidt, S.; Shi, W.; Wu, W.; Jaeger, N.A.F.; Kwok, E.; Ratner, D.M.; Chrostowski, L. Optimized sensitivity of Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) strip waveguide resonator sensor. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Khonina, S.; Kazanskiy, N.; Butt, M.A.; Kazmierczak, A.; Piramidowicz, R. Plasmonic sensor based on metal-insulator-metal waveguide square ring cavity filled with functional material for the detection of CO2 gas. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 16584–16594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Butt, M.; Khonina, S.; Kazanskiy, N. An array of nano-dots loaded MIM square ring resonator with enhanced sensitivity at NIR wavelength range. Optik 2019, 202, 163655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Kazanskiy, N.; Butt, M.; Khonina, S. Nanodots decorated MIM semi-ring resonator cavity for biochemical sensing applications. Photon- Nanostructures - Fundam. Appl. 2020, 42, 100836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Huang, Y.-X.; Xie, Y.-Y.; Zhao, W.-L.; Che, H.-J.; Xu, W.-H.; Li, X.; Li, J.-C. A plasmonic refractive index sensor based on a MIM waveguide with a side-coupled nanodisk resonator. 2014 IEEE 20th International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, ChinaDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 1–5.
  209. Hu, F.; Chen, F.; Zhang, H.; Sun, L.; Yu, C. Sensor based on multiple Fano resonances in MIM waveguide resonator system with silver nanorod-defect. Optik 2020, 229, 166237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Harhouz, A.; Hocini, A. Highly sensitive plasmonic temperature sensor based on Fano resonances in MIM waveguide coupled with defective oval resonator. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Rahmatiyar, M.; Afsahi, M.; Danaie, M. Design of a Refractive Index Plasmonic Sensor Based on a Ring Resonator Coupled to a MIM Waveguide Containing Tapered Defects. Plasmonics 2020, 15, 2169–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Yang, X.; Hua, E.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Wen, F.; Yan, S. Fano Resonance in a MIM Waveguide with Two Triangle Stubs Coupled with a Split-Ring Nanocavity for Sensing Application. Sensors 2019, 19, 4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Zhang, Y.; Cui, M. Refractive Index Sensor Based on the Symmetric MIM Waveguide Structure. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 48, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Zhao, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, S. Tunable Fano Resonance in Asymmetric MIM Waveguide Structure. Sensors 2017, 17, 1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N.; Butt, M.A.; Kaźmierczak, A.; Piramidowicz, R. A Numerical Investigation of a Plasmonic Sensor Based on a Metal-Insulator-Metal Waveguide for Simultaneous Detection of Biological Analytes and Ambient Temperature. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Zhu, J.; Lou, J. Ultrasensitive and Multifunction Plasmonic Temperature Sensor with Ethanol-Sealed Asymmetric Ellipse Resonators. Molecules 2018, 23, 2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Zhu, J. and Lou, J. High-sensitivity Fano resonance temperature sensor in MIM waveguides coupled with a polydimethylsiloxane-sealed semi-square ring resonator. Results in physics 2020, 18, 103183. [Google Scholar]
  218. Kong, Y.; Wei, Q.; Liu, C.; Wang, S. Nanoscale temperature sensor based on Fano resonance in metal–insulator–metal waveguide. Opt. Commun. 2017, 384, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Xie, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhao, W.; He, C. A Plasmonic Temperature-Sensing Structure Based on Dual Laterally Side-Coupled Hexagonal Cavities. Sensors 2016, 16, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Butt, M.; Kazanskiy, N.; Khonina, S. On-chip symmetrically and asymmetrically transformed plasmonic Bragg grating formation loaded with a functional polymer for filtering and CO2 gas sensing applications. Measurement 2022, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Tathfif, I.; Hassan, F.; Rashid, K.S.; Yaseer, A.A.; Sagor, R.H. A highly sensitive plasmonic refractive index sensor based on concentric triple ring resonator for cancer biomarker and chemical concentration detection. Opt. Commun. 2022, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Yan, S.; Liu, P.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Shen, L.; Zhang, X.; Cui, J.; Li, T.; Cui, Y.; Ren, Y. High-Property Refractive Index and Bio-Sensing Dual-Purpose Sensor Based on SPPs. Micromachines 2022, 13, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Butt, M.A.; Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L. Simple and Improved Plasmonic Sensor Configuration Established on MIM Waveguide for Enhanced Sensing Performance. Plasmonics 2022, 17, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Chen, H.; Qi, Y.; Ding, J.; Yuan, Y.; Tian, Z.; Wang, X. Independently tunable dual resonant dip refractive index sensor based on metal–insulator–metal waveguide with Q-shaped resonant cavity. Chin. Phys. B 2022, 31, 034211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Bensalah, H.; Hocini, A.; Bahri, H. DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A MID-INFRARED ULTRA-HIGH SENSITIVE SENSOR BASED ON METAL-INSULATOR-METAL STRUCTURE AND ITS APPLICATION FOR TEMPERATURE AND DETECTION OF GLUCOSE. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 2022, 112, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Butt, M.A. Plasmonic sensor realized on metal-insulator-metal waveguide configuration for refractive index detection. Photon- Lett. Pol. 2022, 14, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Marvi, F.; Jafari, K. A Novel BioNEMS Sensor Based on Tunable Plasmonic Modes of a Grating MIM Structure. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2022, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Chen, F.; Yang, W.X. Pressure sensor based on multiple Fano resonance in metal–insulator–metal waveguide coupled resonator structure. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2022, 39, 1716–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Chau, Y.-F.C.; Ming, T.Y.; Chao, C.-T.C.; Thotagamuge, R.; Kooh, M.R.R.; Huang, H.J.; Lim, C.M.; Chiang, H.-P. Significantly enhanced coupling effect and gap plasmon resonance in a MIM-cavity based sensing structure. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Tathfif, I.; Yaseer, A.A.; Rashid, K.S.; Sagor, R.H. Metal-insulator-metal waveguide-based optical pressure sensor embedded with arrays of silver nanorods. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 32365–32376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Palizvan, P.; Olyaee, S.; Seifouri, M. An Optical MIM Pressure Sensor Based on a Double Square Ring Resonator. Photon- Sens. 2018, 8, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Butt, M.; Kazanskiy, N.; Khonina, S. Highly integrated plasmonic sensor design for the simultaneous detection of multiple analytes. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2020, 20, 1274–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Butt, M.A.; Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N. Highly Sensitive Refractive Index Sensor Based on Plasmonic Bow Tie Configuration. Photon- Sens. 2020, 10, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. A Butt, M.; Khonina, S.N.; Kazanskiy, N.L. A multichannel metallic dual nano-wall square split-ring resonator: design analysis and applications. Laser Phys. Lett. 2019, 16, 126201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Zhu, J.; Jin, G. Detecting the temperature of ethanol based on Fano resonance spectra obtained using a metal-insulator-metal waveguide with SiO2 branches. Opt. Mater. Express 2021, 11, 2787–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Xu, D.; Yan, S.; Yang, X.; Su, H.; Wu, X.; Hua, E. A Nanoscale Structure Based on a Ring With Matchstick-Shape Cavity for Glucose Concentration and Temperature Detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 21, 4442–4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 72139 g002
Figure 2. A W/G evanescent field sensor is shown in an image. At the W/G surface, receptor molecules catch molecular targets, modifying the W/G mode effective index. The propagating optical mode is thus phase-shifted as a result.
Figure 2. A W/G evanescent field sensor is shown in an image. At the W/G surface, receptor molecules catch molecular targets, modifying the W/G mode effective index. The propagating optical mode is thus phase-shifted as a result.
Preprints 72139 g002
Preprints 72139 g003
Figure 3. (a) Experimental setup to characterize the sensing device, (b) Ring resonator device, (c) A standard output spectrum of a porous ring resonator. Adapted with permission from [20].
Figure 3. (a) Experimental setup to characterize the sensing device, (b) Ring resonator device, (c) A standard output spectrum of a porous ring resonator. Adapted with permission from [20].
Preprints 72139 g003
Preprints 72139 g004
Figure 4. Widely utilized SOI W/G structures for optical biosensing.
Figure 4. Widely utilized SOI W/G structures for optical biosensing.
Preprints 72139 g004
Preprints 72139 g005
Figure 5. (a) Snapshot of the CO2 volume percentage in the gas chamber rising [82], (b) when the CO2 percentage in the gas chamber is over the threshold, the warning light turns on, and the output signal changes from "safe" to "dangerous" [82], (c) Image of the gas chamber with the CO2 conc. reduced [82], (d) when the CO2 conc. in the gas compartment is below the threshold, the warning light turns-off, and the signal that was previously outputted as "dangerous" changes to "safe" [82].
Figure 5. (a) Snapshot of the CO2 volume percentage in the gas chamber rising [82], (b) when the CO2 percentage in the gas chamber is over the threshold, the warning light turns on, and the output signal changes from "safe" to "dangerous" [82], (c) Image of the gas chamber with the CO2 conc. reduced [82], (d) when the CO2 conc. in the gas compartment is below the threshold, the warning light turns-off, and the signal that was previously outputted as "dangerous" changes to "safe" [82].
Preprints 72139 g005
Preprints 72139 g006
Figure 6. Synopsis of PCF expansion. Stimulated by [108].
Figure 6. Synopsis of PCF expansion. Stimulated by [108].
Preprints 72139 g006
Preprints 72139 g007
Figure 7. (a) H-shaped PCF-based surface plasmon resonance (PCF-SPR) sensor schematic diagram [111], (b) SPR sensor in cross-section [111], (c) experimental SPR sensor configuration for detecting RI [111].
Figure 7. (a) H-shaped PCF-based surface plasmon resonance (PCF-SPR) sensor schematic diagram [111], (b) SPR sensor in cross-section [111], (c) experimental SPR sensor configuration for detecting RI [111].
Preprints 72139 g007
Preprints 72139 g008
Figure 8. Schematic of PC formation, (a) 1D, (b) 2D, (c) 3D.
Figure 8. Schematic of PC formation, (a) 1D, (b) 2D, (c) 3D.
Preprints 72139 g008
Preprints 72139 g009
Figure 9. PC sensing devices, (a) SEM image of the PC resonator [156], (b) E-field distribution within the cavity [156], (c) 3D representation of an integrated optofluidic device [156], (d, e) electron micrograph images of the two PC sensor geometries, (f-h) E-field distribution at the resonant frequency of the optical mode [157], (i) SEM image of the fabricated sensing device and the graphic of the experimental setup [158].
Figure 9. PC sensing devices, (a) SEM image of the PC resonator [156], (b) E-field distribution within the cavity [156], (c) 3D representation of an integrated optofluidic device [156], (d, e) electron micrograph images of the two PC sensor geometries, (f-h) E-field distribution at the resonant frequency of the optical mode [157], (i) SEM image of the fabricated sensing device and the graphic of the experimental setup [158].
Preprints 72139 g009
Preprints 72139 g010
Figure 10. PC fluid sensor, (a) SEM image of the cross-sectional view of the PC structure [24], (b) SEM image of the top view of the PC structure [24], (c) Numerical model of the sensing device [24], (d) transmission spectrum [24].
Figure 10. PC fluid sensor, (a) SEM image of the cross-sectional view of the PC structure [24], (b) SEM image of the top view of the PC structure [24], (c) Numerical model of the sensing device [24], (d) transmission spectrum [24].
Preprints 72139 g010
Preprints 72139 g011
Figure 11. MS absorber designs, (a) HMSPA design [173], (b)T/R/A spectrum [173], (c) Top view of the norm. E-field distribution [173], (d) 3D E-field distribution [173]. Cross-sectional view of the norm., (e) E-field distribution at the resonant wavelength [173], (f) E-field distribution at non-resonant wavelength [173], (g) H-field distribution at resonant wavelength [173], (h) graphical illustration of the tunable optical plasmonic Gr MS [174], (i) top view of the unit cell [174], (j) transmission spectrum [174], (k) E-field mapping at the dip for the bright mode [174], (l) E-field mapping at the peak for plasmonic-induced transparency [174], (m) theoretical coupled model [174].
Figure 11. MS absorber designs, (a) HMSPA design [173], (b)T/R/A spectrum [173], (c) Top view of the norm. E-field distribution [173], (d) 3D E-field distribution [173]. Cross-sectional view of the norm., (e) E-field distribution at the resonant wavelength [173], (f) E-field distribution at non-resonant wavelength [173], (g) H-field distribution at resonant wavelength [173], (h) graphical illustration of the tunable optical plasmonic Gr MS [174], (i) top view of the unit cell [174], (j) transmission spectrum [174], (k) E-field mapping at the dip for the bright mode [174], (l) E-field mapping at the peak for plasmonic-induced transparency [174], (m) theoretical coupled model [174].
Preprints 72139 g011
Preprints 72139 g012
Figure 12. Applications of SPR sensors in telemedicine [196], medical diagnostic [197], early disease detection [198], colorimetric sensor [199], food safety, temperature sensor, and bioimaging [200].
Figure 12. Applications of SPR sensors in telemedicine [196], medical diagnostic [197], early disease detection [198], colorimetric sensor [199], food safety, temperature sensor, and bioimaging [200].
Preprints 72139 g012
Preprints 72139 g013
Figure 13. Graphic illustration (top view) of plasmonic sensors established on MIM W/G, (a) RR linked to a MIM W/G with tapered defects [211], (b) two triangle stubs paired with a split-ring nanocavity [212], c) two stubs and a RR [213], (d) two baffles and a coupled ring cavity [214]. Thermal sensing devices, (e) ethanol-sealed asymmetric ellipse resonators [216], (f) ethanol-filled resonator cavity [218], (g) dual laterally side-coupled hexagonal cavities [219], h) simultaneous temperature sensor and biosensor [215].
Figure 13. Graphic illustration (top view) of plasmonic sensors established on MIM W/G, (a) RR linked to a MIM W/G with tapered defects [211], (b) two triangle stubs paired with a split-ring nanocavity [212], c) two stubs and a RR [213], (d) two baffles and a coupled ring cavity [214]. Thermal sensing devices, (e) ethanol-sealed asymmetric ellipse resonators [216], (f) ethanol-filled resonator cavity [218], (g) dual laterally side-coupled hexagonal cavities [219], h) simultaneous temperature sensor and biosensor [215].
Preprints 72139 g013
Preprints 72139 g014
Figure 14. Modified plasmonic BG structure, (a) sensor design [220], (b) transmission spectrum [220], (c) S analysis [220].
Figure 14. Modified plasmonic BG structure, (a) sensor design [220], (b) transmission spectrum [220], (c) S analysis [220].
Preprints 72139 g014
Table 1. Recently proposed photonic sensors established on different optical W/G components.
Table 1. Recently proposed photonic sensors established on different optical W/G components.
Device Type Experiment/
Simulation		 Sensitivity FOM Q-factor LOD Ref.
RR established on ridge W/G Experiment 112 nm/RIU - - 1.6x10-6 [51]
PC heterostructure cavities Experiment 1500 nm/RIU - 50000 7.8x10-6 [52]
RR established on ridge W/G Experiment 2169 nm/RIU - - 8.3x10-6 [53]
2D PC microcavity Experiment 200 nm/RIU - 400 0.002 [54]
RR established on ridge W/G Simulation 167 nm/RIU 49.9 561.6 2.75x10-2 [55]
PC slot microcavity Experiment 370 nm/RIU - 7500 2.3x10-5 [56]
RR established on slot W/G Experiment - - - 5x10-6 [57]
RR established on slot W/G Experiment 298 nm/RIU - - 4.2x10-5 [58]
Mach Zehnder Interferometer Experiment 2.5 pm/K - - - [59]
RR established on SWG double slot W/G Simulation 840 nm/RIU 6461.5 9246.2 - [2]
Grating sensor Experiment 1606.2 nm/RIU - - 3x10-5 [60]
PC point defect resonant cavity Simulation 330 nm/RIU - 3820 0.001 [61]
Young Interferometer Experiment 2.2 rad/oC - - 6.4x10-6 [62]
PC ring-slot structure Simulation 160 nm/RIU - 107 8.75x10-5 [63]
RR established on SWG hybrid plasmonic W/G Simulation 1000 nm/RIU 287.35 441.05 - [64]
Young Interferometer Experiment 0.051 - - 1x10-6 [65]
RR coupled phase-shifted BG resonator Simulation 297.13 nm/RIU - 2000 1.1x10-4 [50]
Slot RR and BG Simulation 211.43 nm/RIU - 1720 1.26x10-3 [66]
RR established on SWG Simulation 7061 nm/RIU - 15918 1.74x10-5 [48]
Table 2. Recently proposed photonic sensors established on different types of OFs. .
Table 2. Recently proposed photonic sensors established on different types of OFs. .
Ref. Fiber Type Application Sensitivity Sensing Mechanism Year
[112] U-shaped MMF Biosensing 1251.44 nm/RIU LSPR 2020
[113] Plastic OF Cholesterol detection 140 mg/dL to 250 nm/dL - 2017
[114] SMF Temperature 210.25 KHz/oC Vernier effect 2020
[115] Fiber tip integrated ZnO-nanowire-nanograting Temperature 0.066 nW/oC Bragg reflection 2023
[116] Magnetic field micro-nano fiber Magnetic field 69 pm/Gs Mach-Zehnder interference 2022
[117] PC fiber Biosensing 12000 nm/RIU and 16000 nm/RIU SPR 2020
[118] D-shaped OF Biosensing 5161 nm/RIU SPR 2018
[119] D-shaped OF Biosensing 4122 nm/RIU LMR 2018
[120] PC fiber Temperature 0.1636 nm/oC Quantum dot 2009
[121] D-shaped PC fiber Biosensing 20000 nm/RIU SPR
[122] D-shaped PC fiber Biosensing 21700 nm/RIU SPR 2017
[123] Octagonal PC fiber Transformer oil 31240 RIU-1 (x-pol.),
30830 RIU-1 (y-pol.)		 Plasmonic 2020
[124] Elliptical channel PC fiber Malaria detection 11428.57 nm/RIU, 9473.68 nm/RIU, 9655.17 nm/RIU - 2021
Table 3. Biosensors established on PC reported in recent years.
Table 3. Biosensors established on PC reported in recent years.
Polarization RI Range S (nm/RIU) Reference
(I) x-polarized mode
(II) y-polarized mode		 - 4156.82 (I)
3703.64 (II)		 [143]
y-polarized mode 1.36-1.40 33500 [144]
(I) x-polarized mode
(II) y-polarized mode		 1.33-1.45 10448.5 (I)
8230.07 (II)		 [145]
(I) x-polarized mode
(II) y-polarized mode		 1.330-1.370 5000 (I)
10000 (II)		 [146]
(I) x-polarized mode
(II) y-polarized mode		 1.33-1.40 9000 (I)
9000 (II)		 [147]
x-polarized mode 1.0-1.05 508 [148]
x-polarized mode - 510 [139]
y-polarized mode 1.0-1.0010 3200 [140]
y-polarized mode 1.33-1.43 2150 [149]
y-polarized mode 1.33-1.37 1000 [150]
y-polarized mode 1.4-1.44 9180 [151]
(I) x-polarized mode
(II) y-polarized mode		 1.33-1.34 2000 (I)
1700 (II)		 [152]
x-polarized mode 1.0-1.377 160 [63]
x-polarized mode 1.0-2.0 65.7 [153]
y-polarized mode 1.0-1.8 396 [154]
y-polarized mode 1.0-1.33 300 [155]
Table 4. Recent advances in Narrowband MS perfect absorbers for sensing applications.
Table 4. Recent advances in Narrowband MS perfect absorbers for sensing applications.
Ref. Device Design Material Wavelength Range Application Sensitivity
[173] Square and hollow square meta-atoms Si-dielectric-metal NIR Temperature
Biosensing		 -0.18 nm/oC
355 nm/RIU
[175] Nano-trench Graphene NIR Biosensing 500 nm/RIU to 1000 nm/RIU
[176] Rectangular strip Dielectric-metal MIR Biosensing 1800 nm/RIU
[177] Square Si-dielectric-metal NIR Biosensing 460 nm/RIU to 492 nm/RIU
[178] Square Metal-dielectric NIR Biosensing 840 nm/RIU
[179] Cylinder InSb THz Biosensing 1800 GHz/RIU to 1900 GHz/RIU
[180] Cylinder Metal-dielectric-metal NIR Biosensing 1109 nm/RIU to 1290 nm/RIU
[181] C-shape split ring GST phase changing material NIR Biosensing 1000 nm/RIU
[182] Metal disc Metal-graphene FIR Biosensing 3.98 μm/RIU to 5.06 μm/RIU
[169] Cylinder Si-dielectric-metal NIR Gas 17.3 pm/ppm
[183] Vertical strip-ring Metal THz Biosensing 908 nm/RIU to 4367 nm/RIU
[184] - Gold-Si-Graphene THz Biosensing 66 GHz/RIU
[185] Cross array Si-gold THz Biosensing 25.3 THz/RIU to 41.3 THz/RIU
Table 5. Recently proposed highly attractive plasmonic sensors established on MIM W/G.
Table 5. Recently proposed highly attractive plasmonic sensors established on MIM W/G.
Ref. Application Sensitivity FOM Q-Factor Year
[221] (I) Gas,
(II) biochemical		 (I) 3639.79 nm/RIU,
(II) 7530.49 nm/RIU		 91.02 99.75 2022
[220] Gas 226 pm/ppm 0.004 24.7 2022
[222] Bio-analytes 3000 nm/RIU 9.7 x105 - 2022
[215] Bio-analytes
Temperature		 700 nm/RIU,
-0.35 nm/oC		 21.9,
0.008		 - 2021
[223] Bio-analytes
Temperature		 -0.58 nm/oC and
-0.64 nm/oC
1240 nm/RIU and
1350 nm/RIU		 (I) 8.6 and 1955.2,
(II) 18.74 and 691		 - 2022
[224] Bio-analytes 1578 nm/RIU 175 - 2022
[225] Temperature,
Glucose		 1.55 nm/oC,
4074 nm/RIU		 2.45x10-6 - 2022
[226] Bio-analytes 825.7 nm/RIU 13.14 - 2022
[227] Bio-analytes 7872 nm/RIU 394 - 2022
[228] Pressure 10.96 and 10.5 nm/MPa - - 2022
[229] Bio-analtyes 2473 nm/RIU 34.18 56.35 2021
[230] Pressure 25.4 nm/MPa - - 2021
[231] Pressure 16.5 nm/MPa - - 2018
[232] Bio-analytes 1948.67 nm/RIU 29.52 29.90 2020
[233] Bio-analytes 2300 nm/RIU 31.5 31.1 2020
[205] Gas 135.95 pm/ppm - - 2021
[234] Bio-analytes 793.3 nm/RIU 52.9 82.1 2019
[235] Bio-analytes
Temperature		 1406.25 nm/RIU
0.45 nm/oC		 156.25 - 2021
[236] Temperature
Glucose		 1.525 nm/oC
0.45 nm.L/g		 52.73 - 2021
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated