Analysis of Laser Plasma Aluminum Monoxide Emission Spectra

Preprint

Article

Analysis of Laser Plasma Aluminum Monoxide Emission Spectra

Altmetrics

Downloads

135

Views

Comments

Christian Parigger^*

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

29 April 2023

Posted:

30 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts

Abstract

This work communicates analysis of aluminum monoxide, AlO, laser-plasma emission records using line strength data and the ExoMol astrophysical database. A nonlinear fitting program computes comparisons of measured and simulated diatomic molecular spectra. Predicted cyanide spectra of the AlO, ${\rm B}\ ^2\,\Sigma^+ \longrightarrow {\rm X} \ ^2\,\Sigma^+$, $\Delta {\rm v} = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, + 3$ sequences and progressions compare nicely with 1 nanometer resolution experimental results. The analysis discusses experiment data captured during laser ablation of Al$_2$O$_3$ with 266-nm, 6-mJ pulses. The accuracy of the AlO line strength data is better than one picometer. This work presents as well comparison of the $^{27}$Al$^{16}$O line strength and of ExoMol data for spectral resolutions of 0.1nm and 0.07nm. Accurate AlO databases show a volley of applications in laboratory and astrophysical plasma diagnosis.

Keywords:

Subject: Physical Sciences - Atomic and Molecular Physics

1. Introduction

The diatomic molecule aluminum monoxide, AlO, occurs in plasma-emission following laser ablation of aluminum containing samples, including alumina (Al

_{2}

_{3}

) [1] or aluminum containing alloys [2]. Combustion of aluminized propellants also reveals nice AlO flame emission spectra [3]. Usually, accurate diatomic line strengths data are preferred in the analysis [4,5,6] of recorded data. However, recent interest in exo-planet spectroscopy motivates determination of molecular databases, viz. ExoMol [7]. The ExoMol database lists various AlO isotopologues, however this work focuses on

^{27}

^{16}

O. The transition of interest is the AlO

B^{2} Σ^{+} - X^{2} Σ^{+}

band system that is similar in principle to previously communicated cyanide, CN

B^{2} Σ^{+} - X^{2} Σ^{+}

band system [8].

Spectroscopy [9,10,11,12,13,14,15] of laser-plasma reveals clean AlO band system for delays of the order of several dozens of microseconds from the initial ablation plasma generation using pulse widths of a few nanoseconds. For aluminum monoxide spectroscopy, one can employ the ExoMol database in conjunction with the PGOPHER program for simulating rotational, vibrational and electronic spectra [16]. There are of course other databases that can be accessed [17] for diatomic molecules, including HITEMP that for example shows hydroxyl, OH, data [18]. The ExoMol AlO data files for the states and the transitions are converted in this work to line strength files for the purpose of utilizing previously communicated and extensively tested line-strength data that are freely available along with MATLAB [19] scripts for a subset of transitions associated with the AlO B-X band systems [4,5,6].

2. Experimental and Analysis Overview

The data from laser ablation experiments with frequency quadrupled Q-switched Nd:YAG radiation [1] show a range of 430 nm to 540 nm, and the published comparisons with line strength data reveal a temperature of 3,432 Kelvin at a delay of 20

μ

s. The measurements use standard laser-induced-breakdown-spectroscopy (LIBS) equipment. The analysis in that work utilizes AlO-lsf line strengths and the Nelder-Mead downhill simplex, non-linear fitting algorithm [20]. The analysis communicated in this work is designed such that the same nonlinear method can be used, but the ExoMol data base for AlO is recast in a set of transitions with line strength data that are determined from Einstein A-coefficients.

2.1. Diatomic Molecular Analysis

The computation of diatomic molecular spectra utilizes line strength data. The Boltzmann equilibrium spectral program (BESP) and the Nelder-Mead temperature (NMT) program allow one to respectively compute an emission spectrum and fit theoretical to experimental spectra. The construction of the communicated molecular AlO line strengths “AlO-lsf” [5] first, makes use of Wigner-Witmer eigenfunctions and a diatomic line position fitting program, second, computes Frank-Condon factors and r-centroids, and third, combines these factors with the rotational factors that usually decouple from the overall molecular line-strength due to the symmetry of diatomic molecules. In turn, the ExoMol states and transition files for AlO [21,22] are utilized for the generation of line strength data that can be used with BESP and NMT.

The ExoMol data show Einstein A-coefficients that are converted to line strengths [23,24,25], S, for electric dipole transitions, using

A_{u l} = \frac{16 π^{3}}{3 g_{u} h ϵ_{0} λ^{3}} {(e a_{0})}^{2} S_{u l}, g_{u} = 2 (2 J_{u} + 1) .

(1)

Here,

A_{u l}

denotes the Einstein A-coefficient for a transition from an upper, u, to a lower, l, state, and h and

ε_{0}

are Planck’s constant and vacuum permittivity, respectively. The elementary charge is e, the Bohr radius is

a_{0}

, and the transition strength is

S_{u l}

. The line strength, S, that is used in the MATLAB scripts is expressed in traditional spectroscopy units (stC

^{2}

^{2}

). The wavelength of the transition is

λ

g_{u}

is the upper state degeneracy and

J_{u}

the total angular momentum of the upper state. In the establishment of line strength data, Hund’s case (a) basis functions are preferred in connection with application of the Wigner and Witmer [26,27] diatomic eigenfunction.

2.2. Air Wavelength vs. Vacuum Wavenumber

For NMT analysis the recorded, digital intensity values versus calibrated wavelength are utilized. The variation of the refractive index,

r_{i}

, of air at 15

^{\circ}

C, 101,325 Pa, and 0% humidity, with wavenumber [28],

10^{8} (r_{i} - 1) = \frac{k_{1}}{(k_{0} - σ^{2})} + \frac{k_{3}}{(k_{2} - σ^{2})},

(2)

where

σ

is the wavenumber in units of

μ

^{- 1}

, allows one to compute air wavelengths from the vacuum wavenumbers. Table 1 lists constants in Eq. (2).

Table 1. Constants for variation of refractive index, see Equation 2.

Parameter	Value ( $μ$ m $^{- 2}$ )
$k_{0}$	238.0185
$k_{1}$	5,792,105
$k_{2}$	57.362
$k_{3}$	167,917

3. Results

This section elaborates analysis of recorded AlO spectra of the

B^{2} Σ^{+} ⟶ X^{2} Σ^{+}

Δ v = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, 3

sequences and progressions. The use of ExoMol data and computed sets of line strength data that appear to be in use for extragalactic studies [7] would alleviate computation of specific transitions that are investigated in laser-plasma laboratory experiments. The ExoMol database shows 4,945,580 transitions and 94,862 states including the three lowest electronic states,

X^{2} Σ^{+}, A^{2} Π, B^{2} Σ^{+}, C^{2} Π, D^{2} Σ^{+}, and E^{2} Δ

, e.g., 54,585 A states and 10,781 B states. The 10,781 B states lead to 774,575 B-X transitions.

The AlO-lsf B-X data contain 33,484 transitions. The differences in number of transitions are in part due to the number of rotational states, the cutoffs for Einstein A-coefficients and associated line strengths (see Eq. (1)), or the establishment of sets of computed molecular parameters that fit data from high-resolution, Fourier-transform spectroscopy. The line positions are determined from high-resolution data with a standard deviation comparable to the estimated experimental errors of the high resolution line positions. The obtained, simulated line position accuracies are typically better than 0.05

{cm}^{- 1}

In this work, a Gaussian profile models the spectrometer and intensified linear-array detector transfer function. However, a measured system transfer function or a Voigt function can replace the selected Gaussian profile provided that changes are implemented in the MATLAB source scripts for the recently communicated BESP and NMT scripts [5]. N.B., the PGOPHER program allows one to accomplish Voigt profile fits.

3.1. Analysis with NMT Program and ExoMol Line Strengths

The AlO B-X line positions and Einstein A-coefficients (that are converted to line strengths) are collected in a data file that is compatible with the mentioned NMT-spectral fitting program. Figure 1 illustrates spectra determined from temperature fitting with constant Gaussian line-width,

Δ λ

. The simulated spectrum utilizes only AlO B-X transitions in the experimental range of 430 nm to 540 nm. Analysis of the measured data with the AlO-lsf data [1] reveals a temperature of

T = 3, 329 K

, and a fitted FWHM of 1 nm (43 cm

^{- 1}

Figure 1. (a) Experiment. (b) NMT fitting with ExoMol B-X data,

T = 3, 380 K

Δ λ = 1.0 nm

Figure 1. (a) Experiment. (b) NMT fitting with ExoMol B-X data,

T = 3, 380 K

Δ λ = 1.0 nm

3.2. Exomol AlO and AlO-lsf Data Comparisons

The simulated spectra are composed of quite a few individual rotational-vibrational transitions of the AlO B-X

Δ v = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, + 3

sequences and progressions. Table 2 and Table 3 summarize the number of lines in the data files.

Table 2. Number of B-X transitions and those in the experimental range 430 nm to 540 nm (18,500

{cm}^{- 1}

to 23,250

{cm}^{- 1}

Table 2. Number of B-X transitions and those in the experimental range 430 nm to 540 nm (18,500

{cm}^{- 1}

to 23,250

{cm}^{- 1}

Database	AlO B-X	AlO B-X 430 nm to 540 nm
ExoMol	774,575	169,143
AlO-lsf	33,484	29,258

Table 3. Number of transitions in the experiment range 430 nm to 540 nm (see Table 2) with Einstein A-coefficients, A

_{coeff}

, larger than 10

^{3}

^{- 1}

Table 3. Number of transitions in the experiment range 430 nm to 540 nm (see Table 2) with Einstein A-coefficients, A

_{coeff}

, larger than 10

^{3}

^{- 1}

Database	AlO B-X 430 nm to 540 nm A $_{coeff} > 10^{3} s^{- 1}$
ExoMol	104,260
AlO-lsf	29,258

Table 4 displays agreements of lines within the indicated wavenumber range and otherwise the same identification for upper and lower levels of the transitions.

Table 4. Subset AlO B-X lines of the ExoMol data that agree within

Δ \tilde{ν}

of 29,258 AlO B-X transitions in the AlO-lsf data for the experiment range 430 nm to 540 nm (or exactly 18,500

{cm}^{- 1}

to 23,250

{cm}^{- 1}

Table 4. Subset AlO B-X lines of the ExoMol data that agree within

Δ \tilde{ν}

of 29,258 AlO B-X transitions in the AlO-lsf data for the experiment range 430 nm to 540 nm (or exactly 18,500

{cm}^{- 1}

to 23,250

{cm}^{- 1}

Database	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 0.05 {cm}^{- 1}$	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 0.2 {cm}^{- 1}$	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 1.0 {cm}^{- 1}$	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 2.0 {cm}^{- 1}$	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 10.0 {cm}^{- 1}$	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 20.0 {cm}^{- 1}$
ExoMol	747	3,146	10,843	14,425	21,036	22,609

The differences in accuracy of the line positions can cause systematic errors in analysis of plasma emission spectra. Visualization of these differences is suggested by (a) generating a “numerical experiment" spectrum using the AlO B-X data as extracted from the Exomol database, and then (b) analyzing the synthetic spectrum with the AlO-lsf database. Figure 2 exhibits the Exomol-database generated and AlO-lsf line strength data analyzed results.

The obvious undulations in the difference spectrum illustrates the ExoMol inaccuracies indicated in Table 4. A temperature of T = 3,380 K and a full-width-at-half-maximum, fixed Gaussian line-width,

Δ \bar{λ}

, of 0.1 nm is selected for the “numerical experiment.” Analysis by only fitting temperature yields T = 3,200 K, i.e., a temperature that is about five per cent lower than specified for the spectrum in Figure 2 (a).

Further comparisons of the AlO-lsf and AlO-ExoMol databases explore the

Δ v = 0

AlO B-X sequence. Figure 3 illustrates AlO-Exomol data computed for a temperature of 3,380 K and a spectral resolution of 0.07 nm, and it also shows the NMT-simulated results when only fitting temperature. As expected, there is a difference of approx. 30 per cent between specified (3,380 K) and fitted temperature (2,460 K). For a spectral resolution of 0.1 nm, the fitted temperature for the

Δ v = 0

AlO B-X sequence equals 2,920 K, or in other words, the temperature difference decreases is approx. 14 per cent lower than specified.

Figure 2. (a) Numerical experiment data, T = 3,380 K,

Δ \bar{λ} = 0.1 nm

. (b) NMT fitting with AlO-lsf B-X data, inferred temperature from fixed line-width fitting:

T = 3, 200 K

Figure 2. (a) Numerical experiment data, T = 3,380 K,

Δ \bar{λ} = 0.1 nm

. (b) NMT fitting with AlO-lsf B-X data, inferred temperature from fixed line-width fitting:

T = 3, 200 K

Table 5 and Table 6 summarize comparisons of the transition lines with Einstein A-coefficients larger than 10

^{3}

^{- 1}

. There are about five times more lines in the ExoMol database for the 10-nm spectral window. Among the 2,818 AlO-lsf lines only 96 ExoMol lines agree within better than

0.05 {cm}^{- 1}

, and 1,517 ExoMol lines show wave numbers within

3 {cm}^{- 1}

(about 0.07 nm) of those of the AlO-lsf data.

Table 5. Number of transitions in the experiment range 483 nm to 493 nm with Einstein A-coefficients, A

_{coeff}

, larger than 10

^{3}

^{- 1}

Table 5. Number of transitions in the experiment range 483 nm to 493 nm with Einstein A-coefficients, A

_{coeff}

, larger than 10

^{3}

^{- 1}

Database	AlO B-X 483 nm to 493 nm A $_{coeff} > 10^{3} s^{- 1}$
ExoMol	10,159
AlO-lsf	2,818

Table 6. AlO B-X lines of the ExoMol data that agree within

Δ \tilde{ν}

of 2,818 transitions in the AlO-lsf data for the range 483 nm to 493 nm (20,284

{cm}^{- 1}

to 20,704

{cm}^{- 1}

Table 6. AlO B-X lines of the ExoMol data that agree within

Δ \tilde{ν}

of 2,818 transitions in the AlO-lsf data for the range 483 nm to 493 nm (20,284

{cm}^{- 1}

to 20,704

{cm}^{- 1}

Database	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 0.05 {cm}^{- 1}$	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 0.3 {cm}^{- 1}$	$Δ \tilde{ν} < 3.0 {cm}^{- 1}$
ExoMol	96	506	1,517

The AlO-lsf line strength database has been extensively tested [6]. The ExoMol database appears acceptable within ≃ 20 wavenumbers, i.e., average spectral resolution of ≃ 0.3 nm. Analysis of higher than 0.3 nm resolution data, viz. spectral resolution of 0.07 nm, is affected by the inaccuracies of the line positions listed in the ExoMol database. The AlO-lsf database accuracy is better than 0.05 cm

^{- 1}

that corresponds to ≃ 1 picometer for the AlO B-X bands.

Figure 3. (a) Numerical experiment data, T = 3,380 K,

Δ \bar{λ} = 0.07 nm

. (b) NMT fitting with AlO-lsf B-X data, inferred temperature from fixed line-width fitting:

T = 2, 460 K

Figure 3. (a) Numerical experiment data, T = 3,380 K,

Δ \bar{λ} = 0.07 nm

. (b) NMT fitting with AlO-lsf B-X data, inferred temperature from fixed line-width fitting:

T = 2, 460 K

4. Discussion

The AlO

B^{2} Σ^{+} - X^{2} Σ^{+}

Δ v = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, + 3

sequences and progressions reveal many vibrational and rotational transitions that are usually not individually resolved in the study of laser-induced plasma emissions in the spectral range of 430 nm to 540 nm. Analysis of the 1-nm spectral resolution experimental emission spectrum with ExoMol line strengths and the NMT program shows AlO excitation temperature of ≃ 3,380 K that is consistent with previous analysis with AlO-lsf line strengths. However, for the

Δ v = 0

sequence, and for a spectral resolution of 0.07 nm, there is a significant difference of ExoMol-computed and AlO-lsf fitted temperatures of typically 30%.

The agreement of the ExoMol AlO B-X and AlO-lsf line position is marginal when using accuracies of the order of 0.05 cm

^{- 1}

, or of the order of 1 picometer. For spectral resolutions of 3 cm

^{- 1}

, or about 0.07 nm, and in the

Δ v = 0

sequence, use of the AlO-lsf database is recommended. For measurements with spectral resolutions of 43 cm

^{- 1}

, or of the order of 1 nanometer, almost exactly identical results are inferred from fitting of measured ablation spectra. A significant advantage of the AlO-lsf database is its accuracy in predicting line position compared to the ExoMol database. The AlO-lsf line strength table is generated by fitting high resolution Fourier-transform data rather than computation from first principles.

Acknowledgments

The author (CGP) acknowledges the support in part by the Center for Laser Applications at the University of Tennessee Space Institute.

References

Dors, I.G.; Parigger, C.G.; Lewis, J.W.L. Spectroscopic Temperature Determination of Aluminum Monoxide in Laser Ablation with 266-nm Radiation. Opt. Lett. 23, 1778, (1998). [CrossRef]
Surmick, D.M.; Parigger, C.G. Aluminum Monoxide Emission Measurements in a Laser-Induced Plasma. Appl. Spectrosc. 68, 992 , (2014). [CrossRef]
Parigger, C.G.; Woods, A.C.; Surmick, D.M.; Donaldson, A.B.; Height, J.L. Aluminum Flame Temperature Measurements in Solid Propellant Combustion. Appl. Spectrosc. 68, 362, (2014). [CrossRef]
Parigger, C.G.; Hornkohl, J.O. Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 81, 404, (2011). [CrossRef]
Parigger, C.G. Diatomic Line Strengths for Fitting Selected Molecular Transitions of AlO, C₂, CN, OH, $N_{+}^{2}$ , NO, and TiO, Spectra Foundations 3, 1, (2023). [CrossRef]
Parigger, C.G.; Hornkohl, J.O. Quantum Mechanics of the Diatomic Molecule with Applications; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020.
Tennyson, J.; Yurchenko, S.N.; Al-Refaie, A.F.; Clark, V.H.J.; Chubb, K.L.; Conway, E.K.; Dewan, A.; Gorman, M.N.; Hill, C.; Lynas-Gray, A.E.; Mellor, T.; McKemmish, L.K.; Owens, A.; Polyansky, O.L.; Semenov, M.; Somogyi, W.; Tinetti, G.; Upadhyay, A.; Waldmann, I.; Wang, Y.; Wright, S.; Yurchenko, O.P. The 2020 release of the ExoMol database: Molecular line lists for exoplanet and other hot atmospheres. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 255, 107228, (2020). [CrossRef]
Parigger, C.G. Laser Plasma Cyanide Emission Spectra Analysis. Submitted to Int. Rev. At. Mol. Phys. (2022).
Kunze, H.-J. Introduction to Plasma Spectroscopy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009.
Fujimoto, T. Plasma Spectroscopy; Clarendon Press; Oxford, UK, 2004.
Ochkin, V.N. Spectroscopy of Low Temperature Plasma; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2009.
Demtröder, W. Laser Spectroscopy 1: Basic Principles, 5th ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2014.
Demtröder, W. Laser Spectroscopy 2: Experimental Techniques, 5th ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2015.
Miziolek, A.W., Palleschi, V., Schechter, I. (Eds.) Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): Fundamentals and Applications; Cambridge Univ. Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
Singh, J.P.; Thakur, S.N. (Eds.) Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020.
Western, C.M. A Program for Simulating Rotational, Vibrational and Electronic Spectra. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 186, 221, (2017).
McKemmish, L.K. Molecular diatomic spectroscopy data. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 11, e1520, (2021). [CrossRef]
Rothman, L.S.; Gordon, I.E.; Barber, R.J.; Dothe, H.; Gamache, R.R.; Goldman, A.; Perevalov, V.I.; Tashkun, S.A.; Tennyson, J. HITEMP, the high-temperature molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2010, 111, 2139. [CrossRef]
MATLAB Release R2022a Update 5, The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, Massachusetts, US, 2022.
Nelder, J.A.; Mead, R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comp. J. 7, 308, (1965). [CrossRef]
Patrascu, A.T.; Yurchenko, S.N.; Tennyson J. ExoMol molecular line lists: IX The spectrum of AlO. Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 449, 3613, (2015). [CrossRef]
Bowesman, C.A.; Shuai, M.; Yurchenko, S.N.; Tennyson, J. A high resolution line list for AlO. Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 508, 3181, (2021). [CrossRef]
Condon, E.U.; Shortley, G.H. The Theory of Atomic Spectra; Cambridge Univ Press: Cambridge, UK, 1964.
Hilborn, R.C. Einstein coefficients, cross sections, f values, dipole moments, and all that. Am. J. Phys. 50, 982, (1982). [CrossRef]
Thorne, A.P. Spectrophysics, 2nd ed.; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, US, 1988.
Wigner, E.; Witmer, E.E. Über die Struktur der zweiatomigen Molekelspektren nach der Quantenmechanik. Z. Phys. 51, 859, (1928). [CrossRef]
Wigner, E.; Witmer E.E. On the structure of the spectra of two-atomic molecules according to quantum mechanics. In Hettema H. (Ed) Quantum Chemistry: Classic Scientific Papers. World Scientific: Singapore, SG, 2000; 287.
Ciddor, P.E. Refractive index of air: New equations for the visible and near infrared. Appl. Opt. 35, 1567, (1996). [CrossRef]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Choose an area of interest and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer

Analysis of Laser Plasma Aluminum Monoxide Emission Spectra

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental and Analysis Overview

2.1. Diatomic Molecular Analysis

2.2. Air Wavelength vs. Vacuum Wavenumber

3. Results

3.1. Analysis with NMT Program and ExoMol Line Strengths

3.2. Exomol AlO and AlO-lsf Data Comparisons

4. Discussion

Acknowledgments

References

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Subscribe