Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study

Version 1 : Received: 7 May 2023 / Approved: 9 May 2023 / Online: 9 May 2023 (08:08:15 CEST)

How to cite: SHIM, J.-S.; KIM, M.-Y.; AN, S.-J.; KANG, E.-S.; CHOI, Y.-S. Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study. Preprints 2023, 2023050593. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0593.v1 SHIM, J.-S.; KIM, M.-Y.; AN, S.-J.; KANG, E.-S.; CHOI, Y.-S. Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study. Preprints 2023, 2023050593. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0593.v1

Abstract

As medical care aiming to maintain the quality of life for elderly patients is increases, implant treatment for elderly patients is increasing worldwide. Therefore, we aimed to investigate implant stability and the reliability of different measuring devices according to implant placement site and duration in patients aged over 65 years. The study evaluated 60 implants in 60 patients aged ≥ 65 years. The implant placement sites were divided into six evenly distributed sections (n=10) i.e., maxillary right- posterior, A; maxillary anterior, B; maxillary left-posterior, C; mandibular right-posterior, D; mandibular anterior, E; mandibular left-posterior, F. Participants visited the hospital seven times: preoperatively, 1V; implant surgery, 2V; stitch removal, 3V; 1-month follow-up, 4V; 2-months follow-up, 5V; before final-restoration delivery, 6V; and after final-restoration delivery, 7V. The implant stability was evaluated with the Osstell Mentor (ISQ), Periotest M (PTV), and Anycheck (IST). The mean values of ISQ, PTV, and IST were analyzed (α=.05). ISQ, PTV, and IST results of 5V and 6V were significantly higher than those of 2V (P<.05). The lowest ISQ results occurred in E location at 5V and 6V (P<.05). In all mandibular locations, IST results of 7V were significantly higher than those of 2V, 3V, 4V, and 5V (P<.05). ISQ results were negatively correlated with PTV and positively correlated with IST, and PTV was negatively correlated with IST. By considering various factors that affect implant stability, the appropriate implant load application time was determined. This could help increase the implant success rate in elderly patients. And as a diagnostic device for implant stability for evaluation of osseointegration in elderly patients, Anycheck was also able to prove its relative reliability compared to Osstell ISQ Mentor and Periotest M.

Keywords

Implant stability; Implant stability quotient; Periotest value; Implant stability test; Prospective study; Elderly patient

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Dentistry and Oral Surgery

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.