Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Personalized Medicine of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Depression Treatment in Obese and Metabolically Dysregulated Patients

Altmetrics

Downloads

187

Views

44

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

22 May 2023

Posted:

23 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The co-occurrence of depression and obesity has become a significant public health concern worldwide. Recent studies have shown that metabolic dysfunction, which is commonly observed in obese individuals and characterized by inflammation, insulin resistance, leptin resistance, and hypertension, is a critical risk factor for depression. This dysfunction may induce structural and functional changes in the brain, ultimately contributing to depression's development. Given that obesity and depression mutually increase each other's risk of development by 50-60%, there is a need for effective interventions that address both conditions. The comorbidity of depression with obesity and metabolic dysregulation is thought to be related to chronic low-grade inflammation, characterized by increased circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and C-reactive protein (CRP). As pharmacotherapy fails in at least 30-40% of cases to adequately treat major depressive disorder, a nutritional approach is emerging as a promising alternative. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) are a promising dietary intervention that can reduce inflammatory biomarkers, particularly in patients with high levels of inflammation, including pregnant women with gestational diabetes, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and overweight individuals with major depressive disorder. Further effort directed to implement these strategies in clinical practice could contribute to improved outcomes in patients with depression and comorbid obesity and/or metabolic dysregulation.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Psychiatry and Mental Health

1. Introduction

Depression and obesity have emerged as significant public health concerns due to their increasing prevalence. Before 2020, depression impacted about 280 million people globally [1], but the COVID-19 pandemic has worsened the situation, leading to an increase of about 53.2 million new cases of major depressive disorder (MDD) and an overall prevalence of 3152.9 cases per 100,000 population [2]. MDD can affect individuals of any age, ethnicity, causing severe individual and socioeconomic consequences [3,4]. Women have a higher risk of developing MDD compared to men [4,5] and adolescents, especially girls and young women, experience a significant increase in the prevalence of depression, self-harm, suicide, and overall [6]. MDD not only impacts mental health, but also has significant effects on physical health, functional abilities, workplace productivity, and economic burden [7,8,9]. The economic burden includes the costs of medical treatments, which may not always effectively manage depression or its complications [8,10].
Depression is notorious for being a risk factor for metabolic dysfunction associated with obesity, including inflammatory response, high blood pressure, impaired insulin sensitivity and impaired leptin sensitivity [11]. This association suggests a bidirectional relationship between depression and metabolic dysfunction, with each condition increasing the progressive risk of each other by 50–60% [12]. Metabolic abnormalities related to inflammation, commonly observed in individuals with obesity, may play a vital neurobiological role in the onset of depression beyond the influence obesity alone [13,14,15]. Obese adults have a 14–34% higher risk of clinically diagnosed MDD compared to non-obese controls, while obese adolescents have a 40% increased risk of developing depression [16,17,18]. The combined impact of MDD and obesity on quality of life is greater than their independent effects, suggesting a synergistic relationship between these conditions [19].
Current pharmacotherapy for MDD is often inadequate due to the heterogeneity of patients under the existing diagnostic system. As a result, there is a growing interest in nutritional approaches, such as omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) supplementation, as a potential alternative for treating MDD. A recent practice guideline published by Guu et al. (2019) recommends considering n-3 PUFAs as a possible therapeutic option for MDD based on their beneficial effects on inflammation and mood, and in lowering the likelihood of developing MDD in specific populations, including women with perinatal MDD, children, and the elderly [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Recent studies have also investigated the effect of n-3 PUFAs on individuals with high inflammation, including MDD patients (Mischoulon et al., 2022; Rapaport et al., 2016), patients with MDD and comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus [24,26] or who are overweight/obese [27].

2. MDD, Stress and Neuropsychoimmunity

MDD is a leading cause of global disability [28] and is diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria, with symptoms that may vary between individuals. One pathophysiological mechanism of MDD is attributed to the neuroendocrine theory of abnormal homeostasis of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, characterized by excessive activation of the stress hormone cortisol [29]. Acute and severe forms of MDD have been associated with an increased cortisol response to stress, whereas mild or atypical types of MDD may not display the same cortisol response [30].
In addition to cortisol, adipokines such as leptin and adiponectin, have also been proposed to play significant roles in MDD. Leptin can activate PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Akt pathways that inhibit GSK3β activities and elevate β-catenin signaling Akt signaling pathway [31], besides activate hypothalamic brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-expressing neurons to induce neuroprotection [32]. Leptin levels are lower in male patients with MDD but higher in those with BMI ≥ 25 and aged 40 and above [33]. Adiponectin has receptors in the brain and can cross the blood-brain barrier. Its pathways promote neurogenesis [34], spinogenesis, dendritic complexity [35] and synaptic plasticity modulation [36], suggesting it could result in antidepressant responses [37,38].
The neuroimmune hypothesis posits that inflammatory may have a role in MDD as evidenced by elevated levels of markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-17 (IL-17), interleukin-21 (IL-21), interleukin-35 (IL-35), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and F2-isoprostanes in individuals with MDD [39,40]. Clinical findings indicating that cytokine administration leads to the development of MDD in 40–50% of patients [41,42,43,44]. Furthermore, chronic neuroinflammation, specifically interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interferon-α (IFNα) can result in structural, connectivity, and excitability changes in the brain [45]. Notably, chronic systemic inflammation has been identified as a major contributor to neuropsychiatric symptoms in obese individuals, irrespective of depressive history [46].
The classical antidepressant hypothesis, known as the monoamine theory uses monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to restore low monoamine levels in the brain [47], while serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are also used to treat MDD [48] but individual response varies significantly. Long-term follow-up studies have identified a higher risk of weight gain in individuals prescribed antidepressants, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches that consider an individual’s BMI or adiposity [49]. Studies have shown that different medications may be more effective for individuals with different levels of obesity, with escitalopram being more effective for individuals with normal BMI, venlafaxine for those with obesity class II and III, and bupropion-SSRIs for those with obesity class III (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) [50,51]. However, morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) may complicate the drug response outcomes [52], suggesting the need for personalized treatment approaches.
Despite advances in MDD treatment, approximately 30% failed to achieve adequate clinical response [53], while higher BMI has been associated with poorer treatment outcomes [54,55] and increased side effects leading to lower compliance [56,57]. These individual factors, including BMI and adiposity, highlight the need to improve tolerability and efficacy, with an understanding of the complex interplay between neuroendocrine, adipokine, and neuroimmune factors and the role of BMI in treatment response being crucial for advancing personalized therapeutic approaches in clinical practice.

3. The Interplay between Depression, Obesity and Metabolic Dysregulation

Obesity, characterized by excessive accumulation of adipose tissue in the body, which affects over one billion worldwide is a significant global health issue associated an increased risk of ischemic heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers cases [58]. Body mass index (BMI) is commonly used to diagnose obesity. However, the application of international BMI criteria to Asian and Pacific populations has been controversial, leading to the development of regional criteria. This underscores the importance of considering population-specific factors, as body composition and adipose tissue distribution can vary across different ethnicities.
Obesity-induced inflammation, characterized by inflammatory processes in adipose tissue, has been linked to mood symptoms associated with obesity [59,60,61]. Chronic inflammation caused by enlarged adipocytes and disruption of adipose tissue function, triggering local and systemic inflammation [62], which is closely associated with metabolic syndrome and damage to various organ systems [63]. Furthermore, immune challenges can activate adipose tissue hypertrophy, inflammation, macrophage infiltration, and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as leptin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) [64,65,66], leading to inflammation in the brain and potentially triggering depression [45].
Obesity and MDD share common mechanisms such as dysregulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, persistent inflammation, and excessive stimulation of the HPA axis (Lee et al., 2016; Milaneschi et al., 2019). Cortisol has been shown to increase appetite and promote the consumption of high-calorie foods, potentially contribute to weight gain and obesity development [17]. Chronic exposure to elevated cortisol levels can lead to structural changes in brain areas, such as the hippocampus, potentially contributing to cognitive deficits commonly seen in patients with MDD [67]. Furthermore, individuals with MDD have been found to exhibit altered cortisol circadian rhythms and blunted cortisol responses to stress, which may be related to HPA axis dysregulation and elevated cortisol levels [67]. Additionally, certain antidepressant medications used to treat MDD may exacerbate obesity through side effects related to weight gain and changes in appetite [68,69].
Leptin resistance is linked to obesity and its associated metabolic imbalances [70]. Adiponectin may have a protective role against the development of metabolic dysregulations [71,72,73]. Adiponectin levels may fluctuate in individuals with MDD and are influenced by factors such as gender [74] and depression severity [75]. Research has also found interleukin-6 (IL-6) increases and expression of adiponectin (ADIPOQ), declined in adipose tissue of depressed patients compared to non-depressed individuals [76]. The severity of depression and adiponectin levels may be correlated, suggesting possible direct involvement in the pathogenesis of depression or the presence of coexisting metabolic disturbances [77].
In addition, the gut microbiota plays a significant role in regulating various physiological processes that affect both obesity and MDD [78]. An imbalance in the microbial community, known as gut dysbiosis, has been implicated as a significant factor in the development of both conditions. “Leaky gut” is associated with increased intestinal permeability has been linked to both inflammatory bowel disorder (IBD) and MDD, particularly in patients with lower levels of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus [79,80,81]. The abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes have been proposed as biomarkers of obesity and linked to IBD [80], their ratio is significantly elevated in individuals who were overweight or obese [82]. N-3 PUFAs derived from flaxseed [83] and fish oil [84] have been shown to lower the their populations. These anaerobic bacteria ferment fibre and produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), which are essential metabolites in maintain intestinal homeostasis, regulating immune function, and systemic effects on metabolism and cardiovascular health [85]. In addition, elevated intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) levels have been observed in patients with recent suicide attempts and are positively correlated with the severity of depressive symptoms [86] while distinct blood microbiome and metabolomic signatures have been observed in depressed patients following antidepressants treatment [87].

4. Personalized Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (n-3 PUFAs) Intervention in Depression

Low levels of n-3 PUFAs, including EPA and DHA, have been observed in depressed patients [88,89], particularly those who do not respond to antidepressant [90]. N-3 PUFAs have been identified as potential therapeutic agents for depression due to their numerous beneficial effects including anti-neuroinflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, anti-neurodegeneration and modulation of neurotransmitter system [91]. Furthermore, supplementation with these fatty acids in the form of fish oil has been found to be comparable to commonly used antidepressant drugs [92,93]. Therefore, supplementation of these fatty acids to maintain adequate level of n-3 PUFAs in the body is crucial.
Mehdi et al. demonstrated the use of omega-3 as adjunct therapy to reduce the severity of depression [5]. Current recommendations suggest using pure EPA or EPA-DHA combination as adjunctive therapy for depression, at 1–2 g/day for at least 8 weeks [23]. These findings suggests that supplementation of PUFAs, may be a potential alternative approach for managing MDD, notably in pregnant women [20,94,95,96], children and elderly. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that n-3 PUFAs have a positive antidepressant effect in MDD patients, with an effect size of 0.4 [97]. It is noteworthy that greater dosage of at least 60% EPA in the intervention group and an increased likelihood of achieving a positive antidepressant response [97]. The effectiveness of EPA supplementation appears to be higher when taken at a dosage of 4 g/day [27,98]. Additionally, Tu et al. investigated the effectiveness of EPA and DHA efficacy using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), observing elevated brain activity in emotion perception and cognitive control regions [99]. However, the efficacy of n-3 PUFAs may vary depending on presence of comorbidities in depressed individuals [100], highlighting the need for personalized treatment strategies tailored to each patient’s unique needs and symptoms.
Individual’s biological characteristics and safety concerns should be considered when personalizing nutritional approaches for the management of MDD. Depressed patients often have co-existing inflammatory conditions, neurodegenerative diseases, or physiological deficits (see Table 1). N-3 PUFAs have shown effectiveness in improving depressive symptoms, especially in those with inflammation. For instance, depression is a common occurrence in patient with hepatitis C who receive interferon (IFN)-α therapy. However, it was found that EPA, but not DHA, significantly impact in reducing the occurrence of IFN-α depression among patient undergoing the therapy [101]. It also indicating that supplementation n-3 PUFAs highly effective in improving depression, with better clinical effect in pure EPA and EPA-major groups compared to DHA-major groups [102], particularly in individuals with high inflammatory status. Omega-3 indices were found to improve cognitive depressive symptoms in depressed patients with chronic heart failure [103]. Furthermore, the effectiveness of n-3 PUFAs supplementation in depressed patient with comorbid cardiovascular disease was found to be dependent on depression severity. Specifically, n-3 PUFAs supplementation (2 g EPA and 1 g DHA daily) only led to improvement in core depression symptoms among patient with very severe MDD when the treatment was stratified based on depression severity [104].
Neuropsychiatric symptoms, including depressive symptoms are common in most of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, however there may be only partially or not at all responsive to conventional antidepressant therapies [105,106]. N-3 PUFAs have showed pleiotropic effects on neural structure and function and play a critical role in regulating mood in the brain. Although the exact mechanisms are not yet understood, n-3 PUFAs can potentially improve depressive symptoms and slow cognitive decline in patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s [91]. In a study by Lin et al. (2022), n-3 PUFA treatment using 0.8 g EPA and 0.35 g DHA daily or pure 1.6 g EPA daily in Alzheimer’s patients resulted in a clinical improvement of inflammatory biomarker, chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4) and a slowdown in cognitive decline, specifically in the spoken ability domain [107]. Similarly, Freund-Levi et al. (2008) found that n-3 PUFAs treatment with 1.7 g DHA and 0.6 g daily supplementation led to significant improvements in neuropsychiatric symptoms, including potentially positive effects on depressive symptoms in non-APOE omega4 carriers and agitation symptoms in APOE omega4 carriers among patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease [108]. Chiu et al. (2008) demonstrated that n-3 PUFAs monotherapy exhibited a higher level of eicosapentaenoic acid on red blood cell membranes and a significant improvement in the cognitive portion of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) compared to the placebo group in participants with mild cognitive impairment. However, this may not be as effective in those with Alzheimer’s disease [109].
Additionally, da Silva et al. (2008) investigated the effect of chronic supplementation with fish oil containing 1.2 g/day of n-3 PUFAs and found that it led to a high rate of remission of depressive symptoms over a 3-month period, regardless of whether the Parkinson’s patients were taking antidepressant medication or not [109]. Moreover, a recent study by Borsini et al. (2021) demonstrated the neuroprotective effects of EPA and DHA treatment in preventing neurodegeneration and apoptosis induced by cytokines such as IL1β, IL-6, and IFN-α in human hippocampal neurogenesis and depression. These effects were mediated through LOX and CYP450-derived EPA/DHA metabolites [118]. Total erythrocyte n-3 PUFA concentrations are positively associated with cognitive function, particularly immediate recall, in older people with previous depression [119]. Similarly, higher levels of EPA and DHA erythrocyte were linked to improved depressive symptoms, especially following six months of high levels of EPA and DHA supplementation, [120]. Recent review study revealed that n-3 PUFAs may represent a promising strategy for managing long COVID, as they can potentially alleviate chronic inflammation and restore tissue homeostasis which can ultimately aid in the recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection [121]. Likewise, while the primary management of mood disorders like depression in COPD involves the use of antidepressants, their tolerability is limited. However, as n-3 PUFAs are crucial in regulating inflammatory responses, they could be a promising alternative for managing mood disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [122]. However, further clinical trial is necessary to fully comprehend the potential advantages of n-3 PUFAs in managing these comorbidities and its long-term consequences.
It is noteworthy that safety considerations must be carefully evaluated and monitored in the development and implementation of personalized n-3 PUFAs treatment approaches. While numerous findings suggest that n-3 PUFA treatment may be beneficial in improving neuropsychiatric and depressive symptoms in adults, it is crucial to acknowledge that n-3 PUFAs also impact depressive symptoms in vulnerable population including children, adolescents, and pregnant women [114,123,124]. In general, numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that n-3 PUFAs are generally well tolerated in diverse populations. For instance, EPA and DHA are well tolerated in hepatitis C infection patients, no effect of PUFAs treatment on viral load nor excessive bleeding or liver function observed [101]. n-3 PUFAs with a ratio of EPA/DHA at least 1.5 has (≥1.5) been effective in treating mild-to-moderate depression in pregnant and postpartum women with minimal side effects. The trials included in the analysis did not show significant difference in incidence of gastrointestinal and neurologic adverse effect between the n-3 PUFAs and placebo groups [124]. In addition to youth with MDD, n-3 PUFAs supplementation also showed its potential effects in the improvement of clinical symptoms in those with high inflammation or a low baseline n-3 index, particularly youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), subthreshold psychotic states, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [115,117,123]. Overall, n-3 PUFAs supplementation provides no significant adverse effect, a safe and effective therapy to these vulnerable groups [114,115,124]. However, developing personalized n-3 PUFA treatment requires a deep understanding of the molecular and genetic factors that contribute to disease susceptibility and progression. This is particularly important for patients with comorbid MDD and obesity as well as metabolic dysregulation, where tailored n-3 PUFA treatments may be necessary to optimize outcomes and minimize potential adverse effects.

5. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (n-3 PUFAs) for Depression Treatment in Obese and Metabolically Dysregulated Patients

Selected key studies of n-3 PUFAs treatment on MDD, obesity and metabolic dysregulation reviewed in this paper are summarized in Table 2.
Individuals with comorbid conditions such as depression, obesity, and metabolic dysregulation pose a challenge in terms of developing effective treatments due to the complex nature of these conditions. Bot et al. (2011) found no significant effect of EPA supplementation on BDNF levels in patients with both depression and diabetes, despite ongoing antidepressant use. However, the study authors noted that the baseline BDNF levels were relatively high and ongoing antidepressant treatment throughout the study may have influenced the results but not depression severity [107].
Apart from diabetes, obesity is a frequently observed risk factor for metabolic syndrome and is often coexisting with depression. n-3 PUFAs at a dose of 1080 mg EPA and 720 mg DHA per day significantly reduced depression and body weight compared to placebo in patients with depression and comorbid obesity, but weight regain occurred in the follow-up period [108]. Nevertheless, several studies have indicated that n-3 PUFAs may have favorable effects on body composition and weight. For instance, a study revealed that the consumption of fish or fish oil led to reduced body weight, fat mass, and waist circumference in the n-3 PUFAs group in comparison to the control group [125]. A reduction in energy intake, carbohydrates, and fat has been observed in overweight and obese females (25.8–39.9 kg/m2) with n-3 PUFAs supplementation (2.8 g/day DHA) over a 12-week period, however no significant effect implied on body weight [126]. Obese participants with BMI of 30–40 kg/m2 given n-3 PUFA (180 mg EPA, 120 mg DHA) treatment for 4 weeks had reduced caloric intake, increased fullness, and non-significant changes in BMI and serum leptin levels, indicating potential effects on satiety and energy intake [127]. High-dose supplementation (4 g/d) of n-3 PUFAs has been shown to induce significant changes in adipose tissue, circulating fatty acids, and systemic inflammatory markers in individuals with obesity and insulin secretion, indicating the potential therapeutic effects of n-3 PUFAs on body weight [128].
n-3 PUFAs have been acknowledged for their potential therapeutic advantages in individuals with obesity, which linked to the long-term energy imbalance and adipocyte-derived hormones such as leptin and appetite sensations [129]. Depression is also associated with adiposity, and both conditions exacerbate each other. This vicious cycle is fuelled by inflammation [60]. The response to EPA versus DHA may vary depending on baseline inflammatory biomarkers and adiponectin levels for those individuals who had high baseline inflammatory biomarkers [130]. A recent study revealed that high doses of EPA (4 g/d) may be more effective in treating resistant depression with severe inflammation, particularly in those overweight individuals with high inflammation [27]. However, further research is needed to determine ideal dosages for EPA and DHA supplementation, in specific subgroups with comorbidities of depression.

6. Future Perspective

The global health landscape faces significant challenges due to the co-occurrence of depression and obesity, as these conditions worsen each other’s effects and negatively impact patients’ quality of life and treatment outcomes. N-3 PUFAs supplementation has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for addressing both depression and obesity, as it has been shown to have beneficial effects on inflammatory markers, body weight, and depressive symptoms. However, optimal dosing and duration of supplementation for individuals with comorbid depression and obesity or metabolic dysregulation are still unclear. In the future, personalized and precision medicine approaches could play a crucial role in addressing this complex clinical challenge. Traditional anthropometric indices, such as body mass index (BMI), may not fully capture the complexity of obesity-related metabolic complications, and additional clinical parameters may be needed for accurate risk evaluation.
The traditional “one-size-fits-all” approach to treating depression is limited due to the heterogeneity of symptoms and treatment response. Personalized treatment that considers the complexity of comorbidities and individual characteristics may improve outcomes for individuals with coexist MDD and obesity. Therefore, a personalized medicine approach that integrates individualized adipose tissue health and metabolic parameters may offer more effective and tailored interventions. Further research is recommended to better understand how n-3 PUFAs work in obesity and MDD, to establish most favorable dosage and duration of supplementation for people with comorbidities. By implementing personalized and precision medicine approaches in clinical practice could significantly improve treatment outcomes for individuals with comorbid MDD and obesity. Further investigation is warranted to improve the application of N-3 PUFAs supplementation and sharpen up the personalized medicine strategies, ultimately enhancing the efficacy of interventions for this complex patient population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.W. and W.J.C.; writing—review editing J.P.-C.C., T.W.G., M.C.H., C.K.H., D.M., L.C. and K.P.S.

Funding

The authors of this work were supported by the following grants: MOST 109-2320-B-038-057-MY3, 110-2321-B-006-004, 110-2811-B-039-507, 110-2320-B-039-048-MY2, 110-2320-B-039-047-MY3, 110-2813-C-039-327-B, 110-2314-B-039-029-MY3, 111-2321-B-006-008, and NSTC 111-2314-B-039-041-MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan; ANHRF 109-31, 109-40, 110-13, 110-26, 110-44, 110-45, 111-27, 111-28, 111-47, 111-48, and 111-52 from An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan; CMRC-CMA-2 from Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan; CMU 110-AWARD-02, 110-N-17, 1110-SR-73 from the China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; and DMR-106-101, 106-227, 109-102, 109-244, 110-124, 111-245, 112-097, 112-086, 112-109, 112-232 and DMR-HHC-109-11, HHC-109-12, HHC-110-10, and HHC-111-8 from the China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Depression fact sheet [Fact sheet]. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression (accessed on 12 March 2023).
  2. Collaborators, C.-M.D. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2021, 398, 1700–1712. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zisook, S.; et al. Effect of Age at Onset on the Course of Major Depressive Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 2007, 164, 1539–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Picco, L.; et al. Gender differences in major depressive disorder: findings from the Singapore Mental Health Study. Singapore Med J 2017, 58, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mehdi, S.; et al. Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation in the Treatment of Depression: An Observational Study. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2023, 13, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Twenge, J.M. Increases in Depression, Self-Harm, and Suicide Among U.S. Adolescents After 2012 and Links to Technology Use: Possible Mechanisms. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice 2020, 2, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hammer-Helmich, L.; et al. Functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: the 2-year PERFORM study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018, 14, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Greenberg, P.E.; et al. The Economic Burden of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018). PharmacoEconomics 2021, 39, 653–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Christensen, M.C.; Wong, C.M.J.; Baune, B.T. Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder and Their Impact on Psychosocial Functioning in the Different Phases of the Disease: Do the Perspectives of Patients and Healthcare Providers Differ? Frontiers in Psychiatry 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Culpepper, L. Understanding the burden of depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2011, 72, e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fulton, S.; et al. The menace of obesity to depression and anxiety prevalence. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2022, 33, 18–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luppino, F.S.; et al. Overweight, obesity, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010, 67, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pan, A.; et al. Bidirectional association between depression and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Penninx, B.W.J.H.; Lange, S.M.M. Metabolic syndrome in psychiatric patients: overview, mechanisms, and implications. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 2018, 20, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.; et al. The Relationship Between Obesity and Depression Is Partly Dependent on Metabolic Health Status: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database Study. Front Endocrinol 2022, 13, 880230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Patsalos, O.; et al. Diet, Obesity, and Depression: A Systematic Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2021, 11, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Milaneschi, Y.; et al. Depression and obesity: evidence of shared biological mechanisms. Mol Psychiatry 2019, 24, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mannan, M.; et al. Prospective Associations between Depression and Obesity for Adolescent Males and Females—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0157240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nigatu, Y.T.; et al. The Combined Effects of Obesity, Abdominal Obesity and Major Depression/Anxiety on Health-Related Quality of Life: the LifeLines Cohort Study. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0148871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nishi, D.; et al. The Efficacy of Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Depressive Symptoms among Pregnant Women in Japan and Taiwan: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (SYNCHRO; NCT01948596). Psychother Psychosom 2019, 88, 122–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nishi, D.; et al. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for expectant mothers with depressive symptoms in Japan and Taiwan: An open-label trial. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2016, 70, 253–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Su, K.P.; et al. Omega-3 fatty acids for major depressive disorder during pregnancy: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2008, 69, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guu, T.W.; et al. International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research Practice Guidelines for Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. Psychother Psychosom 2019, 88, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nemets, H.; et al. Omega-3 treatment of childhood depression: a controlled, double-blind pilot study. Am J Psychiatry 2006, 163, 1098–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rondanelli, M.; et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on depressive symptoms and on health-related quality of life in the treatment of elderly women with depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Nutr 2010, 29, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khalili, L.; Valdes-Ramos, R.; Harbige, L.S. Effect of n-3 (Omega-3) Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Supplementation on Metabolic and Inflammatory Biomarkers and Body Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs. Metabolites 2021, 11, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mischoulon, D.; et al. Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Major Depressive Disorder With High Inflammation: A Randomized Dose-Finding Clinical Trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2022, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ferrari, A.J.; et al. Burden of Depressive Disorders by Country, Sex, Age, and Year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS Medicine 2013, 10, e1001547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mikulska, J.; et al. HPA Axis in the Pathomechanism of Depression and Schizophrenia: New Therapeutic Strategies Based on Its Participation. Brain Sci 2021, 11, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nandam, L.S.; et al. Cortisol and Major Depressive Disorder-Translating Findings From Humans to Animal Models and Back. Front Psychiatry 2019, 10, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, W.; et al. Leptin receptor knockout-induced depression-like behaviors and attenuated antidepressant effects of exercise are associated with STAT3/SOCS3 signaling. Brain Behav Immun 2017, 61, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liao, G.-Y.; et al. Dendritically targeted Bdnf mRNA is essential for energy balance and response to leptin. Nature Medicine 2012, 18, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cao, B.; et al. Leptin and adiponectin levels in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2018, 238, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, D.; et al. Adiponectin stimulates proliferation of adult hippocampal neural stem/progenitor cells through activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK)/glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β)/β-catenin signaling cascade. J Biol Chem 2011, 286, 44913–44920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, D.; Wang, X.; Lu, X.Y. Adiponectin Exerts Neurotrophic Effects on Dendritic Arborization, Spinogenesis, and Neurogenesis of the Dentate Gyrus of Male Mice. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 2853–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, F.; et al. Adiponectin modulates ventral tegmental area dopamine neuron activity and anxiety-related behavior through AdipoR1. Molecular Psychiatry 2019, 24, 126–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Formolo, D.A.; Lee, T.H.-Y.; Yau, S.-Y. Increasing Adiponergic System Activity as a Potential Treatment for Depressive Disorders. Molecular Neurobiology 2019, 56, 7966–7976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nicolas, S.; et al. Adiporon, an adiponectin receptor agonist acts as an antidepressant and metabolic regulator in a mouse model of depression. Transl Psychiatry 2018, 8, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lindqvist, D.; et al. Oxidative stress, inflammation and treatment response in major depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017, 76, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gałecka, M.; et al. Inflammatory versus Anti-Inflammatory Profiles in Major Depressive Disorders—The Role of IL-17, IL-21, IL-23, IL-35 and Foxp3. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2021, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Alavi, M.; et al. Effect of pegylated interferon-α-2a treatment on mental health during recent hepatitis C virus infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 27, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Raison, C.L.; et al. Neuropsychiatric adverse effects of interferon-alpha: recognition and management. CNS Drugs 2005, 19, 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheng, S.W.; et al. Genetic Variations of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Pathways on Interferon-α-induced Depression in Patients with Hepatitis C Viral Infection. Brain Behav Immun 2021, 93, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Horikawa, N.; et al. Incidence and clinical course of major depression in patients with chronic hepatitis type C undergoing interferon-alpha therapy: a prospective study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2003, 25, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miller, A.H.; Raison, C.L. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat Rev Immunol 2016, 16, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oriolo, G.; et al. History of major depression is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms but not systemic inflammation in a cross-sectional study in obese patients. Brain Behav Immun 2019, 76, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Finberg, J.P.M.; Rabey, J.M. Inhibitors of MAO-A and MAO-B in Psychiatry and Neurology. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dogaru, I.-A.; et al. Current Perspectives on Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Inflammatory Mechanism of Unipolar Depression. Brain Sciences 2022, 12, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Woo, Y.; et al. Obesity and Its Potential Effects on Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Depressive Disorders: A Literature Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2016, 17, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Green, E.; et al. Personalizing antidepressant choice by sex, body mass index, and symptom profile: An iSPOT-D report. Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry 2017, 1–2, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jha, M.K.; et al. Validating pre-treatment body mass index as moderator of antidepressant treatment outcomes: Findings from CO-MED trial. Journal of Affective Disorders 2018, 234, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Targum, S.D.; Catania, C.J. Impact of morbid obesity on treatment outcome in a clinical trial of major depressive disorder. Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry 2017, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rush, A.J.; et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 2006, 163, 1905–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xiao, L.; et al. The association of body mass index (BMI) with treatment outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 2021, 281, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, C.-H.; et al. Both body weight and BMI predicts improvement in symptom and functioning for patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 2014, 161, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. De Filippis, S.; et al. Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice in Italy: Results from the RELIEVE Study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2022, 18, 1665–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cipriani, A.; et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet 2018, 391, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cascio, G.; Schiera, G.; Di Liegro, I. Dietary fatty acids in metabolic syndrome, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Diabetes Rev 2012, 8, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chu, K.; et al. Excess body weight and specific types of depressive symptoms: Is there a mediating role of systemic low-grade inflammation? Brain Behav Immun 2023, 108, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Capuron, L.; Lasselin, J.; Castanon, N. Role of Adiposity-Driven Inflammation in Depressive Morbidity. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Capuron, L.; et al. Depressive symptoms and metabolic syndrome: is inflammation the underlying link? Biol Psychiatry 2008, 64, 896–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Izaola, O.; et al. [Inflammation and obesity (lipoinflammation)]. Nutr Hosp 2015, 31, 2352–2358. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pataky, Z.; Bobbioni-Harsch, E.; Golay, A. Obesity: A Complex Growing Challenge. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2010, 118, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Esser, N.; et al. Inflammation as a link between obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014, 105, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hernandez, J.D.; et al. ω-3PUFA supplementation ameliorates adipose tissue inflammation and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in subjects with obesity: a potential role for apolipoprotein E. International Journal of Obesity 2021, 45, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kyrou, I.; Chrousos, G.P.; Tsigos, C. Stress, visceral obesity, and metabolic complications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1083, 77–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Keller, J.; et al. HPA axis in major depression: cortisol, clinical symptomatology and genetic variation predict cognition. Mol Psychiatry 2017, 22, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gafoor, R.; Booth, H.P.; Gulliford, M.C. Antidepressant utilisation and incidence of weight gain during 10 years’ follow-up: population based cohort study. Bmj 2018, 361, k1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chao, A.M.; et al. Stress, cortisol, and other appetite-related hormones: Prospective prediction of 6-month changes in food cravings and weight. Obesity 2017, 25, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Obradovic, M.; et al. Leptin and Obesity: Role and Clinical Implication. Front Endocrinol 2021, 12, 585887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ohashi, K.; et al. Adiponectin replenishment ameliorates obesity-related hypertension. Hypertension 2006, 47, 1108–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tuppad, S.; et al. Serum Adiponectin and Nitric Oxide Levels in Type II Diabetes and Its Correlation With Lipid Profile. Cureus 2022, 14, e24613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nakamura, Y.; et al. Implications of plasma concentrations of adiponectin in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart 2004, 90, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Weber-Hamann, B.; et al. Resistin and adiponectin in major depression: The association with free cortisol and effects of antidepressant treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2007, 41, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Carvalho, A.F.; et al. Adipokines as emerging depression biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2014, 59, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Coín-Aragüez, L.; et al. Inflammatory gene expression in adipose tissue according to diagnosis of anxiety and mood disorders in obese and non-obese subjects. Scientific Reports 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kahl, K.G.; et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in unipolar major depression. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2012, 262, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Panda, S.S.; et al. A Systematic Review on the Association between Obesity and Mood Disorders and the Role of Gut Microbiota. Metabolites 2023, 13, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Michielan, A.; D’Incà, R. Intestinal Permeability in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathogenesis, Clinical Evaluation, and Therapy of Leaky Gut. Mediators Inflamm 2015, 2015, 628157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stojanov, S.; Berlec, A.; Štrukelj, B. The Influence of Probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio in the Treatment of Obesity and Inflammatory Bowel disease. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Aizawa, E.; et al. Possible association of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota of patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2016, 202, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Palmas, V.; et al. Gut microbiota markers associated with obesity and overweight in Italian adults. Scientific Reports 2021, 11, 5532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, T.; et al. Gut bacteria profiles of Mus musculus at the phylum and family levels are influenced by saturation of dietary fatty acids. Anaerobe 2012, 18, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yu, H.N.; et al. Effects of fish oil with a high content of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on mouse gut microbiota. Arch Med Res 2014, 45, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nogal, A.; Valdes, A.M.; Menni, C. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between gut microbiota and diet in cardio-metabolic health. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ohlsson, L.; et al. Leaky gut biomarkers in depression and suicidal behavior. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2019, 139, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ciocan, D.; et al. Blood microbiota and metabolomic signature of major depression before and after antidepressant treatment: a prospective case–control study. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 2021, 46, E358–E368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Thesing, C.S.; et al. Bidirectional longitudinal associations of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid plasma levels with depressive disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2020, 124, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, P.Y.; Huang, S.Y.; Su, K.P. A meta-analytic review of polyunsaturated fatty acid compositions in patients with depression. Biol Psychiatry 2010, 68, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cussotto, S.; et al. Low omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids predict reduced response to standard antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder. Depression and Anxiety 2022, 39, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhou, L.; et al. Possible antidepressant mechanisms of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids acting on the central nervous system. Front Psychiatry 2022, 13, 933704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gertsik, L.; et al. Omega-3 fatty acid augmentation of citalopram treatment for patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2012, 32, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jazayeri, S.; et al. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and fluoxetine on plasma cortisol, serum interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 concentrations in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2010, 178, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nishi, D.; et al. Plasma estradiol levels and antidepressant effects of omega-3 fatty acids in pregnant women. Brain Behav Immun 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Nishi, D.; et al. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for expectant mothers with depressive symptoms in Japan and Taiwan: An open-label trial. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016, 70, 253–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Su, K.P.; et al. Omega-3 fatty acids for major depressive disorder during pregnancy: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2008, 69, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mocking, R.J.; et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry 2016, 6, e756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lamon-Fava, S.; et al. Clinical response to EPA supplementation in patients with major depressive disorder is associated with higher plasma concentrations of pro-resolving lipid mediators. Neuropsychopharmacology 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tu, C.H.; et al. Brain Responses to Emotional Stimuli after Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid Treatments in Major Depressive Disorder: Toward Personalized Medicine with Anti-Inflammatory Nutraceuticals. J Pers Med 2020, 10, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Schefft, C.; et al. Efficacy of adding nutritional supplements in unipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 27, 1090–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Su, K.P.; et al. Omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention of interferon-alpha-induced depression: results from a randomized, controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry 2014, 76, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Liao, Y.; et al. Efficacy of omega-3 PUFAs in depression: A meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry 2019, 9, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jiang, W.; et al. Long-Chain Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplements in Depressed Heart Failure Patients: Results of the OCEAN Trial. JACC Heart Fail 2018, 6, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Chang, J.P.; et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular diseases comorbid major depressive disorder—Results from a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun 2020, 85, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Mazereeuw, G.; et al. Omega-3 Fatty Acids, Depressive Symptoms, and Cognitive Performance in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Analyses From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2016, 36, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Xu, W.; et al. Feasibility of Investigational Procedures and Efficacy of a Personalized Omega-3 Dietary Intervention in Alleviating Pain and Psychoneurological Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors. Pain Manag Nurs 2023, 24, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bot, M.; et al. Supplementation with eicosapentaenoic omega-3 fatty acid does not influence serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in diabetes mellitus patients with major depression: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neuropsychobiology 2011, 63, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Keshavarz, S.A.; et al. Omega-3 supplementation effects on body weight and depression among dieter women with co-morbidity of depression and obesity compared with the placebo: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2018, 25, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. da Silva, T.M.; et al. Depression in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of omega-3 fatty-acid supplementation. J Affect Disord 2008, 111, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chiu, C.C.; et al. The effects of omega-3 fatty acids monotherapy in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2008, 32, 1538–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Freund-Levi, Y.; et al. Omega-3 supplementation in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: effects on neuropsychiatric symptoms. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008, 23, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Okereke, O.I.; et al. Effect of Long-term Supplementation With Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acids vs Placebo on Risk of Depression or Clinically Relevant Depressive Symptoms and on Change in Mood Scores. JAMA 2021, 326, 2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Freeman, M.P.; et al. Omega-3 fatty acids and supportive psychotherapy for perinatal depression: A randomized placebo-controlled study. Journal of Affective Disorders 2008, 110, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Trebatická, J.; et al. Omega-3 fatty-acids modulate symptoms of depressive disorder, serum levels of omega-3 fatty acids and omega-6/omega-3 ratio in children. A randomized, double-blind and controlled trial. Psychiatry Res 2020, 287, 112911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Amminger, G.P.; et al. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids for indicated prevention of psychotic disorders: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010, 67, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Robinson, D.G.; et al. A potential role for adjunctive omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for depression and anxiety symptoms in recent onset psychosis: Results from a 16 week randomized placebo-controlled trial for participants concurrently treated with risperidone. Schizophr Res 2019, 204, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Matsuoka, Y.; et al. Docosahexaenoic acid for selective prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder among severely injured patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2015, 76, e1015–e1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Borsini, A.; et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids protect against inflammation through production of LOX and CYP450 lipid mediators: relevance for major depression and for human hippocampal neurogenesis. Mol Psychiatry 2021, 26, 6773–6788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chiu, C.C.; et al. Associations between n-3 PUFA concentrations and cognitive function after recovery from late-life depression. Am J Clin Nutr 2012, 95, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sinn, N.; et al. Effects of n-3 fatty acids, EPA v. DHA, on depressive symptoms, quality of life, memory and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a 6-month randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition 2012, 107, 1682–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yang, C.P.; et al. Long COVID and long chain fatty acids (LCFAs): Psychoneuroimmunity implication of omega-3 LCFAs in delayed consequences of COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun 2022, 103, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Zailani, H.; et al. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Managing Comorbid Mood Disorders in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Review. J Clin Med 2023, 12, 2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chang, J.P.; Su, K.P. Nutritional Neuroscience as Mainstream of Psychiatry: The Evidence- Based Treatment Guidelines for Using Omega-3 Fatty Acids as a New Treatment for Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2020, 18, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, M.M.; et al. The efficacy and safety of omega-3 fatty acids on depressive symptoms in perinatal women: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Transl Psychiatry 2020, 10, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Bender, N.; et al. Fish or n3-PUFA intake and body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2014, 15, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Harden, C.J.; et al. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation had no effect on body weight but reduced energy intake in overweight and obese women. Nutr Res 2014, 34, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Payahoo, L.; et al. Effects of n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Supplementation on Serum Leptin Levels, Appetite Sensations, and Intake of Energy and Macronutrients in Obese People: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Diet Suppl 2018, 15, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Hernandez, J.D.; et al. ω-3PUFA supplementation ameliorates adipose tissue inflammation and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in subjects with obesity: a potential role for apolipoprotein E. Int J Obes 2021, 45, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Suzuki, K.; Jayasena, C.N.; Bloom, S.R. Obesity and appetite control. Exp Diabetes Res 2012, 2012, 824305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rapaport, M.H.; et al. Inflammation as a predictive biomarker for response to omega-3 fatty acids in major depressive disorder: a proof-of-concept study. Mol Psychiatry 2016, 21, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Personalized medicine of omega-3 fatty acids in depression based on two major clinical considerations.
Table 1. Personalized medicine of omega-3 fatty acids in depression based on two major clinical considerations.
Biological specificity Population Study Design Intervention Main Findings References
i. Depression associated with Inflammation
IFN-induced depression n = 152,
HCV patients		 Double blind, RCT 2-weeks treatment with EPA (3.5 g/day) (n = 50); DHA (1.75 g/day) (n = 51); placebo (n = 50) EPA-treated, not DHA-treated significantly decreased the incidence of IFN-α-induced depression in HCV patient (10%, 28% respectively compared to 30% placebo, p = 0.037). [101]
Cardiovascular disease comorbidity n = 59,
CVDs patients comorbid MDD		 RCT 2-weeks treatment with n-3 PUFAs (EPA 2.0 g/day & DHA 1.0 g/day) (n = 30); placebo (n = 29) No significant differences between groups in HAMD and BDI-II total scores, but n-3 PUFAs significantly reduced HAMD Cognition at week 8 (p < 0.05) and HAMD Core subscale in very severe MDD at week 12 (p < 0.05). [104]
n = 108,
CHF patients comorbid MDD		 Double blind, RCT 2-weeks treatment with n-3 PUFAs (2:1 EPA/DHA 2.0 g/day) (n = 36); EPA (2 g/day) (n = 36); placebo (n = 36) No significant differences between groups in HAMD and BDI-II total scores. BDI-II cognitive depressive subscales strongly associated for the high EPA group (p < 0.05). [103]
n = 92,
CAD patients comorbid MDD		 Double blind, RCT 2-weeks treatment with n-3 PUFAs (1.9 g/day) (n = 45); placebo (n = 47) Plasma EPA and DHA level increased (p < 0.01) but no significant differences between groups in HAMD (p = 0.20) and BDI-II (p = 0.50) total scores. [105]
Pain comorbidity N = 46,
Breast cancer survivor		 Prospective, RCT 6-weeks diet intervention with high n-3 PUFAs (2040 mg, 12 ounces/week wild-caught Alaskan salmon) (n = 24); low PUFAs (1020 mg, 6 ounces/week) (n = 15) High n-3 PUFAs group significantly decrease in pain (p < 0.01), perceived stress (p < 0.05), sleep (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), and fatigue (p < 0.01). [106]
Obesity and metabolic comorbidity n = 25,
Diabetes patients with MDD		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment with EPA (1 g/day) (n = 13), placebo (n = 12) No significant impact on BDNF (p = 0.887) and no significant association between changes in BDNF levels and depression severity (p = 0.593). [107]
n = 45,
Obese patient with MDD		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (1.08 g/d EPA & 0.72 g/d DHA) (n = 24); placebo (n = 21) Significant reduced depression (p = 0.05) in n-3 treatment groups [108]
n = 61,
Obese patient with MDD		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment with EPA (1 g/d, n = 15; 2 g/d, n = 15; 4 g/day, n = 16), placebo (n = 15) EPA 4 g/d produced a sustained effect on IDS-30 scores at both week 8 and week 12. A potential dose-response relationship between EPA dose and change in IDS-C30 scores, but this was not statistically significant. [27]
ii. Depression associated with Neurodegeneration
Parkinson’s disease comorbidity n = 29,
Parkinson’s disease with MDD		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (1200 mg/d) (n = 14); placebo (n = 15) Significant decrease in MADRS and CGI-Depression scores but not in BDI in n-3 PUFAs group [109]
Alzheimer’s disease comorbidity n = 26,
Patients with MCI or AD		 Double blind, RCT 24-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (1080 mg/d EPA & 720 mg/d DHA) (n = 20); placebo (n = 15) No associations were found between randomization group and ADAS-cog, MMSE or HDRS scores [110]
n = 204,
Patient with AD		 Double blind, RCT 6-months treatment n-3 PUFAs (0.6 g/d EPA & 1.7 g/d DHA) (n = 103); placebo (n = 103) No overall n-3 PUFAs effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms. Possible positive effects in MADRS in non-APOEv4 carriers (p = 0.005) [111]
Late-life depression n = 18353,
Adults aged 50 years or older without depression		 RCT Median of 5.3 years treatment n-3 PUFAs (65 mg/d EPA & 375 mg/d of DHA) (n = 9171), placebo (n = 9182) No significant improvement in n-3 PUFAs group in prevention on depression. [112]
iii. Physiological deficits
Perinatal depression n = 59,
Perinatal and postpartum women		 Double blind, RCT 8-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (1.9 g/d) (n = 28), placebo (n = 23) Both groups experienced significant decreases in EPDS and HAM-D scores (p < 0.0001) from baseline [113]
n = 36,
Perinatal women with MDD		 Double blind, RCT 8-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (3.4 g/d) (n = 18), placebo (n = 18) Significant lower EDPS and BDI observed in n-3 PUFAs group. [22]
Safety consideration Special populations
Children, & adolescents with depression n = 60,
Children with DD or MADD		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (2.4 g/d) (n = 30), n-6 PUFAs (n = 30) Significant reductions in CDI scores were observed in the n-3 PUFAs group and in the DD subgroup compared to the n-6 PUFAs and MADD subgroup. No serious side effects were observed, except for increased defecation reported by one participant in the n-3 PUFAs group. [114]
High-risk psychosis n = 81,
Patients with ultra-high risk of psychotic disorder		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (1.2 g/d) (n = 41), placebo (n = 40) Significant improvement observed in PANSS and GAF score but not in MADRS scores. No significant adverse effects between the treatment groups. [115]
n = 50,
Patients with schizophrenia-spectrum or bipolar disorders with medication		 RCT 16-weeks n-3 PUFAs (740 mg/d EPA & 400 mg/d DHA) (n = 27), placebo (n = 26) n-3 PUFAs group showed significant improvement in BPRS scores compared to placebo among a subgroup of patients (N = 23) who did not receive lorazepam. Lower rates of confusion, anxiety, depression, irritability, and tiredness/fatigue in n-3 PUFAs group as compared to those on placebo [116]
n = 110,
Injured patients with PTSD		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks n-3 PUFAs (1470 mg/d DHA & 147 mg/d EPA) (n = 53), placebo (n = 57) Serum BDNF and pro-BDNF changes at week 12 were linked to depression severity, but DHA had no specific effect on these levels. Adverse events, including loose stool and constipation reported, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. [117]
Pregnant women with MDD n = 36,
Perinatal women with MDD		 Double blind, RCT 8-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (3.4 g/d) (n = 18), placebo (n = 18) Well tolerated and there were no adverse effects on the subjects and newborns. [22]
Abbreviation: RCT, randomized controlled trial, EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid, DHA, docosahexaenoic acid, MDD, major depressive disorder, HCV, hepatitis C viral infection, CVD, cardiovascular disease, CAD, coronary artery disease, CHF, chronic heart failure, HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, BDI, Beck’s Depression Inventory, DD, Depressive disorder, MADD, mixed anxiety and depressive disorder; GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning; MADRS, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, BPRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, BPRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder, EDPS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.
Table 2. Characteristics key of preliminary studies of n-3 PUFAs treatment on MDD, obesity and metabolic dysregulation.
Table 2. Characteristics key of preliminary studies of n-3 PUFAs treatment on MDD, obesity and metabolic dysregulation.
References Sample Study design Intervention Outcome scale Main findings Notes and limitations
Bot et al. (2011)
[107]		 n = 25,
Women with MDD and diabetes with antidepressant		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment with EPA (1 g/day) (n = 13), placebo (n = 12) MADRS, Serum BDNF No significant impact on BDNF (p = 0.887) and no significant association between changes in BDNF levels and depression severity (p = 0.593). 1st clinical study to examine the effects of n-3 PUFAs on BDNF. Small sample size. One patient reported allergic reaction and discontinued using EPA, no other severe adverse events reported.
Keshavarz et al. (2018)
[108]		 n = 45,
Women with depression comorbid obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), without antidepressant		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment n-3 PUFAs (EPA 1.08 g/day & DHA 0.72 g/day) (n = 24); placebo (n = 21) Body weight, height, BMI, waist and hip circumferences, total body fat, muscle percentage, BDI, food craving questionnaire, appetite and food abstinence visual Analogue scales Reduced depression (p = 0.05) and body weight (p = 0.049) in n-3 treatment groups Weight regains after one-month follow-up. Side effects includes nausea, skin rash, hemoragia, and increased appetite reported in both groups.
Mischoulon et al. (2022) [27] n = 61,
Patient with MDD comorbid overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), without antidepressant		 Double blind, RCT 12-weeks treatment with EPA (1 g/d, n = 15; 2 g/d, n = 15; 4 g/day, n = 16), placebo (n = 15) IL-6, LPS-stimulated TNF level, plasma hs-CRP level, IDS-C30 EPA 4 g/d produced a sustained effect on IDS-30 scores at both week 8 and week 12. A potential dose-response relationship between EPA dose and change in IDS-C30 scores, but this was not statistically significant. 1st dose-finding trial of EPA in MDD to focus on inflammatory biomarkers as primary outcome among overweight/obese subjects with elevated hs-CRP
Abbreviations: MDD, Major Depression Disorder; BMI, Body Mass Index; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; BNDF, brain-derived neurotropic factor; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS-stimulated TNF level, Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated tumor necrosis factor; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IDS-C30, Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinical-Rated version.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated