Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

A Survey on Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases in Taiwan: Emission Trends, Regulatory Strategies, and Abatement Technologies

Altmetrics

Downloads

149

Views

53

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

23 May 2023

Posted:

25 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Due to their excellent physicochemical properties, fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases), including hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), are used in a variety of applications, but they are potent greenhouse gases. Therefore, they have been blanketed into the list of phase-out under the international protocols or treaties. In this work, the updated statistics of the Taiwan’s national inventory report (NIR) were used to analyze the trends of F-gases (i.e., HFCs, PFCs, SF6 and NF3) emissions during the period of 2000-2020. Furthermore, the regulatory strategies and measures for reducing the emissions of the four F-gases will be summarized to be in accordance with the national and international regulations. With the progressive efforts by the regulatory requirements and the industry’s voluntary reduction, the total F-gases emissions indicated a significant increase from 2,462 kilotons of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2eq) in 2000 to the peak value (i.e., 12,643 kilotons) of CO2eq in 2004, but sharply decreased from 10,284 kilotons of CO2eq in 2005 to 3,906 kilotons of CO2eq in 2020. It was also found that the most commonly used method for controlling the emissions of F-gases from the semiconductor and optoelectronic industries was based on the thermal destruction-local scrubbing technology.
Keywords: 
Subject: Environmental and Earth Sciences  -   Environmental Science

1. Introduction

Certain gases are called as greenhouse gases (GHGs) due to their abilities to absorb infrared (IR) radiation and bring out temperature enhancement in the lower (tropospheric) atmosphere, leading to the heating of the surface on earth. Naturally, the major GHGs include water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and ozone (O3) [1]. Although chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) were phased out under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer [2], the roaring emissions of these synthetically chemical alternatives, including hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), were observed since the 1990s to be consistent with the enhancement of global warming or greenhouse effect due to their highly radioactively active features [3]. More importantly, the temperature rise of 1.5°C on earth could be negatively affected on climate system and ecosystem, causing extreme weather events, shifting wildlife populations and habitats, rising sea level, and disease/epidemic risks increased [4].
To mitigate the emissions of GHGs from anthropogenic activities, the third session (COP3) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was held in Kyoto in December 1997, where HFCs, PFCs and SF6 were included into the basket of the major GHGs for negotiation based on their high global warming potential (GWP), often several thousand times stronger than CO2. Furthermore, NF3 was also mandated to be included in national inventory report (NIR) in the eighteenth session (COP18) of the UNFCCC (held in Dec. 2012) [5]. These fluorinated GHGs (F-gases) are man-made gases which were mostly used as industrial and commercial products like refrigerant, etchant, blowing agent and cleaning solvent [5,6,7,8]. To further reduce the emissions of F-gases, the Kigali Amendment, which signed on 15 October 2016 and entered into force on 1 January 2019 [9,10], added HFCs to the list of controlled substances under the Montreal Protocol. For the developed countries, they are committed to reducing the use of HFCs by 45% by 2024 and by 85% by 2036, compared to their use between 2011 and 2013. On the other hand, the European Union (EU) has promulgated the new F-gases regulation, which applied since 1 January 2015 for replacing its original regulation adopted in 2006 [5,7,11]. The current regulation focused on limiting the total amounts of the most used F-gases (i.e., HFCs) sold, using low global warming potential (GWP) alternatives, and banning the use of F-gases in many new types of equipment.
In response to the international regulations and protocols, the Taiwan government has taken initiatives to prepare the national GHG inventory reports since 1998 in accordance with the guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Currently, the statistical data on national GHGs emissions has been established by ranging the period from 1990 to 2020 [12]. Table 1 summarized the main environmental properties (i.e., atmospheric lifetime, radiative efficiency and global warming potential) of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) [3], which were mainly used in a variety of Taiwan’s industries [13]. Herein, radiative efficiency is a measure of greenhouse strength based on the change in radiative forcing per change in atmospheric concentration of a gas (Watts per meter square per part per billion, Wm-2ppb -1). Global warming potential (GWP) is defined as a comparative measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will absorb over a given period of time (e.g., 100 years), relative to the emissions of 1 ton of carbon dioxide (CO2). According to the data in atmospheric lifetime, most of F-gases are long-lived GHGs, especially in PFCs, SF6, NF3, and few of HFCs like HFC-23. On the other hand, the regulatory establishment may be the most important and efficient tool for mitigating GHGs emission. In this regard, the central competent agency (i.e., Environmental Protection Administration, also abbreviated as EPA) promulgated the regulations governing the climate change issues [14]. These regulations included the Air Pollution Control Act, the Climate Change Response Act of 2023 (the former act called Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act), and the Waste Management Act. The relevant central government agencies also promoted GHGs emission reduction. For example, the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) promulgated the ban on the domestic production of HCFC-22 (CHClF2, one of refrigerants), thus reducing the production of HFC-23 (CHF3, a by-product in the HCFC-22 manufacturing process) [15]. In addition, the Taiwan government announced “Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050” on 30 March 2022 [16], which will put emphasis on the climate-related legislations as a fundamental base.
Based on the survey by the database like Web of Science, few works on the description about the emission trends and regulatory measures of F-gases in Taiwan were discussed in the literature [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Cheng et al. [23] studies SF6 usage and emission factors reflecting common thin film transistor - liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) manufacturing practices in Taiwan. Chen and Hu [22] discussed the voluntary F-gases reduction agreement of the semiconductor and LCD industries in Taiwan, showing over 50% reduction rates for the two industries. In the previous studies [17,18,19,20,21], they focused on the environmental risks and policies of HFCs, PFCs and NF3. In this work, it analyzed the trends of F-gases (i.e., HFCs, PFCs, SF6 and NF3) emissions during the period of 2000-2020 by using the updated Taiwan’s NIR. Furthermore, the regulatory strategies and measures for reducing the emissions of the four F-gases will be summarized to be in accordance with the international protocols. Finally, the current abatement technologies for controlling the emissions of F-gases were surveyed by the Taiwan’s industry alliances like semiconductor association and TFT-LCD association.

2. Data Mining Methods

In this study, an analytical description about the trends of F-gases (i.e., HFCs, PFCs, SF6 and NF3) emissions during the period of 2000-2020 was addressed by using the updated Taiwan’s NIR [12], which was announced by the central competent agency (i.e., EPA) in August 2022. It should be noted that the data on Taiwan’ NIR was obtained on the basis of the proposed method by the IPCC in 2006 [24]. The database can be freely accessed on the official website without permission. The regulatory strategies and measures for reducing the emissions of the four F-gases were extracted from the relevant regulations. They included the Air Pollution Control Act, the Climate Change Response Act, and the Waste management, which were accessed on the official website [25]. Concerning the current abatement technologies for controlling the emissions of F-gases, they were surveyed by the Taiwan’s industry alliances [26,27] and the corporate social responsibility (CSR) report of the Taiwan’s index enterprise [28].

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Analysis of fluorinated greenhouse gases emissions in Taiwan

In Taiwan, the majority of F-gases emissions come from the industrial process and product use (IPPU) sector, which include chemical industry (2B:), metal (aluminum) process (2C), electronics (manufacturings of semiconductor and optoelectronics) industry (2E), alternatives to ozone-depleting substances (2F), manufacturing and use of other products (2G). In addition, most of HFCs substances were used as refrigerant and blowing agent in the energy sector, including service, residential and transport industries. As listed in Table 1, the main applications of these F-gases were used as etching gas, refrigerant, cleaning solvent, blowing agent and extinguishing agent. For the emission trends of the four F-gases, Table 2 and Table 3 listed the individual emissions and total emissions from IPPU sector during the period of 2000-2020, respectively [12]. The corresponding percentage variations on F-gases emissions and their total emissions from IPPU sector every four years were depicted in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively [12]. For the total emission of F-gases, it showed significant increasing trend from 2,462 kilotons of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2eq) in 2000 to the peak value (i.e., 12,643 kilotons) of CO2eq in 2004. Subsequently, it decreased from 10,284 kilotons of CO2eq in 2005 (about 3.54% of the total GHG emissions in 2005) to 3,906 kilotons of CO2eq in 2020 (about 1.37% of the total GHG emissions in 2020), down by 69.1% compared to that in 2004. The following subsections were addressed to highlight the emission trends of individual F-gases.

3.1.1. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)

In general, HFCs with containing one carbon atom (i.e., HFC-23, HFC-32, and HFC-41) were mostly used as etching gas in the semiconductor manufacturing and TFT-LCD industries. In contrast, HFCs with containing two carbon atoms (i.e., HFC-125, HFC-134, HFC-134a, HFC-143 and HFC-143a) were often used as refrigerants in the air-conditioning appliances of residences and vehicles. As indicated in Table 1, HFC-32 was also used as a refrigerant because of its low GWP (i.e., 771). For example, the commercial refrigerant R410A is a mixture of HFC-125 (50%) and HFC-32 (50%). Another commercial refrigerant R407C is a mixture of HFC-125 (25%), HFC-134a (52%) and HFC-32 (23%). Obviously, Table 2 showed the two different stages of HCFs emissions in Taiwan. During the period of 2000-2004, the total HFCs emissions approximately ranged from 2,200 to 2,600 kilotons of CO2eq. However, the total HFCs emissions were approximate to 1,000 kilotons of CO2eq since 2005. To be in accordance with the Montreal Protocol, the Taiwan government promulgated the ban on the production of refrigerant HCFC-22 since 2005, which was only produced by a chemical company. During the manufacture of HCFC-22, a by-product HFC-23 will be generated and emitted from the process. Its emission was obtained by multiplying HCFC-22 production amount with its default emission factor (i.e., 1.4%). As seen in Table 3, the emission amounts of F-gases from the 2B source were null since 2005. Since then, the total F-gases (i.e., HFCs) emission amounts maintained a stable trend because the emission source was mainly derived from the 2F industry. The emission amounts of HFCs refrigerants were estimated by leakage rates proposed by the IPCC method [24]. Regarding the emission amounts of HFCs for other uses (i.e., blowing agent, cleaning solvent, extinguishing agent and aerosol propellant), they were estimated by their imported amounts, but only accounted for less amounts. Concerning the data on the percentages of HFCs (Figure 2), they were 94.2% in 2000, 19.4% in 2004, 17.1% in 2008, 21.2% in 2012, 23.6% in 2016, and 27.0% in 2020.

3.1.2. Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)

PFCs are known for their rather stable properties because of the strength of the carbon-fluorine bond, leading to their industrial applications in the cleaning of dry etch and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processes. Therefore, the main emission sources of PFCs are from the semiconductor manufacturing and TFT-LCD industries in Taiwan. As listed in Table 1, these PFCs substances, including PFC-14 (CF4), PFC-116 (C2F6), PFC-218 (C3F8) and PFC-c-318 (C4F8, octafluorocyclobutane), are potent GHGs due to their long atmospheric lifetimes and high GWP values. The total emissions of PFCs in Taiwan indicated a decreasing trend over the past two decades. Table 2 showed a decline rate of about 75% (i.e., 4,341 kilotons of CO2eq in 2004 vs. 1,447 kilotons of CO2eq in 2020). It can be also seen that the total emissions of PFCs increased significantly from 13 kilotons of CO2eq in 2000 to 4,198 kilotons of CO2eq in 2003. These variations were attributed to the mass production of the Taiwan’s electronic industries during the early 2000s and subsequently take actions on the voluntary PFCs reduction technologies like de-PFCs/local scrubber and alternatives with low GWP. Also shown in Figure 1, the proportions of PFCs emission accounted for about one-third of the total F-gases emissions since 2004.

3.1.3. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)

In general, the main emission sources of SF6 include the electrical power, semiconductor manufacturing, TFT-LCD and magnesium production industries. Due to its high inertness and unique dielectric properties, it has been used as a dielectric medium in electric power systems, a silicon etchant for wafer manufacturing, and an inert gas for the casting of magnesium. Based on the data in Table 2 and Figure 1, the trends of total SF6 emissions were very similar to those of total PFCs emissions because the voluntary SF6 emission reduction actions have been also taken by the industrial sector. It showed a decline rate of over 80% since 2004 (i.e., 5,193 kilotons of CO2eq in 2004 vs. 842 kilotons of CO2eq in 2020). It should be noted that the emission source of SF6 from magnesium production in Taiwan can be negligible due to the limited domestic production since the mid-2000s. As seen in Table 3, the emission amounts of the F-gases from the chemical industry (2C) indicated a gradual decline since 2006 because of magnesium production moved out and SF6 reduction by process change. In addition, the total SF6 emission amounts also showed a decreasing trend due to the recovery/recycling technologies widely adopted by the electrical power industry (2G). Using the data on the total F-gases emissions, the proportions of SF6 emission (Figure 2) also showed a significant increase from 4.9% in 2000 to 46.4% in 2008, but they were decreased subsequently to 21.5% in 2020.

3.1.4. Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)

It is well known that nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) is primarily used to remove silicon particles and silicon-containing compounds during the manufacturing of semiconductor devices like flat-panel displays, photovoltaics, light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Although its atmospheric lifetime (i.e., 569 years) is much smaller than other PFCs (2,600-50,000 years) and SF6 (1,000 years), it is a potent GHG with high GWP (i.e., 17,400) and the mass consumption in the semiconductor manufacturing and TFT-LCD industries since the early 2000s, thus grouping with effect from 2013 and the commencement of the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol [5,29]. Just like the increasing trends of PFCs and SF6 emissions, the total emissions of NF3 increased significantly from 10 kilotons of CO2eq in 2000 to 798 kilotons of CO2eq in 2007. Thereafter, the total emissions of NF3 indicated a jagged pattern, ranging from 200 to 800 kilotons of CO2eq during the period of 2007-2020. Herein, the sharp decline of the total NF3 emission (i.e., 204 kilotons of CO2eq) in 2008 should be attributed to the 2008 economic recession around the world. On the other hand, the percentages of the total SF6 emission amounts compared to the total F-gases emission amounts (Figure 2) indicated a rising trend; that is, 0.4% in 2000, 3.2% in 2004, 3.2% in 2008, 9.0% in 2012, 10.8% in 2016, and 14.4% in 2020.

3.2. Regulatory strategies for controlling the emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases

In Taiwan, the regulatory strategies for controlling the emissions of fluorinated GHGs (F-gases) are based on the Air Pollution Control Act, the Climate Change Response Act, and the Waste Management Act. The relevant measures will be addressed in the following sub-sections.

3.2.1. Air Pollution Control Act

This Act was recently revised on 1 August, 2018. Under the authorizations of the Act, the Taiwan EPA promulgated the six GHGs as air pollutants on 9 May 2012, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). The Article 20 of the Act refers to the countermeasures against air pollution [14], including
-
The stationary sources that emit air pollutants shall comply with the emission standards of pipeline (or vent) by installing closed vent/collection system and air pollution control system.
-
The EPA in consultation with relevant agencies (i.e., Ministry of Economic Affairs) shall determine the emission standards based on specially designated industry categories, facilities, pollutant items or areas.
For example, the EPA promulgated the emission standards of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the regulations (“Air Pollution Control and Emission Standards for Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry” and “Air Pollution Control and Emission Standards for Optoelectronic Materials and Element Manufacturing Industry”). Herein, the so-called VOCs include HFCs and PFCs, but not include carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). With the promulgation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act (GGRMA) of 2015, the provisions for controlling GHGs in the Air Pollution Control Act will comply with the CCRA.

3.2.2. Climate Change Response Act

As mentioned above, the Taiwan government passed the Climate Change Response Act (CCRA) on 15 February 2023 for revising the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act (GGRMA) of 2015 [25]. The Act defines the greenhouse gases (GHGs), which refer to the following substances: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and others designated by the central competent authority (i.e., EPA). The most noteworthy point is to set the long-term national GHG net-zero emission goal (carbon neutrality) by 2050. To achieve the goal, all levels of government shall implement GHG reduction and develop negative emission technologies. As mentioned in Sec. 3.1, the major emission sources of the four F-gases were from the industrial (or manufacturing) and waste management sectors in Taiwan. Under the key strategies of the central competent authorities (including the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and EPA), they will focus on the following orientations:
-
Process modification: Equipment renew by phase-out, and fluorinated gases (F-gases) reduction by environment-friendly substitutes and recovery/recycling/destruction system installed in the industrial sector.
-
Circular economy: Recovery/recycling/storage system installed in the waste (waste electronic appliances like air conditioner and refrigerator, and waste vehicles) management sector.

3.2.3. Waste management Act

As mentioned above, the F-gases (especially in HFCs) have been widely used as refrigerants in the vehicles and air-conditioners. In addition, some HFCs are used as blowing agents in the refrigerators. Therefore, these articles will emit these F-gases while discarding them as waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and scrap car [11]. In Taiwan, the legal system for the recycling and treatment of waste was based on the Waste Management Act, aiming at defining the categories of waste, and clarifying its obligations and responsibilities. Herein, the so-called waste referred to any movable solid or liquid substance or object due to some discarded reasons like weakened performance and no economic or market value. In response to the extended producer responsibility (EPR) and sustainable material management, the Taiwan government began to implement the zero waste and resource recycling promotion programs since 1997 [30,31]. Under the authorization of the Act, the regulated recyclable wastes are defined as those that could cause concerns about serious environmental pollution and also possess the value for recycling and reuse. In this regard, the central competent authority (i.e., EPA) has announced the regulated recyclables, including containers, motor vehicles, tires, lead-acid batteries, home electric appliances, information technology (IT) products, dry batteries, lightings, and waste vehicles (car/motorcycle). Concerning the recovery of refrigerant and blowing agent from waste home electric appliances, the Taiwan EPA promulgated the regulations (“Facilities Standards for the Recycling Storage, and Disposal of Electrical and Electronic Waste” and “Facilities Standards for the Recycling Storage, and Disposal of Waste Vehicles”). These regulations required the recycling enterprises to install the recovery (liquefaction or adsorption) equipment and storage tank for HFCs refrigerant in the air conditioning system and blowing agent in the refrigerator foam-insulation system [32,33].

3.3. Survey of current abatement technologies for controlling the emissions of fluorinated GHGs

Concerning the abatement technologies for controlling the emissions of fluorinated GHGs, there are many different options available to control their emissions from process industries, especially in the semiconductor manufacturing and TFT-LCD industries. They are basically grouped into three different approaches [17,34]: (1) material modification and/or substitution, (2) capture recovery-recycling technology, and (3) thermal destruction-local scrubbing technology. The first method should be prioritized, but it could be limited to use more environment-friendly refrigerants and cleaning solvents. According to the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) database set by the US environmental Protection Agency [35], the available environment-friendly refrigerants with low GWP and high safety include hydrofluoro-olefins (HFOs), hydrochlorofluoro-olefins (HCFOs) and hydrofluoro-ethers (HFEs). Regarding the environment-friendly cleaning solvents, the fluorinated substances, including HFOs, HCFOs and HFEs, are listed in the SNAP program. These acceptable substitutes have been specified and also used in the industrial processes. The second method was to adopt the capture recovery-recycling technologies, including cryogenic condensation, adsorption, and membrane separation. However, their recovery availabilities were less found in the industrial processes because of the physicochemical properties of target F-gases (i.e., high fugacity, high stability, low polarity, and low solubility in water), the complicated composition in vent gas, and the high purification requirements of recovered F-gases. Therefore, the most commonly used method for controlling the emissions of F-gases from the process was based on the thermal destruction-local scrubbing technology. These de-PFCs/local scrubber systems have been installed in the Taiwan’s semiconductor manufacturing process [28]. Currently, the thermal destruction methods included the following types: plasma-based, catalyst-based, or combustion-based. Taking NF3 destruction as an example [20], the following equations showed its possible stoichiometry reactions with oxygen, hydrogen and moisture (water vapor).
2NF3 +2O2 → NO + 3F2
2NF3 +3H2 → N2 + 6HF
2NF3 +3H2O → 6HF + NO + NO2
These thermal decomposition products or by-products are easily dissolved into water. For this reason, the vent exhausts from the thermal destruction unit were further removed by the wet scrubbing unit. Although the decomposition product NO is only slightly soluble in water, it is apt to form NO2 under the oxidative environment. Obviously, these decomposition products are acidic compounds, which will react with alkaline solution to produce fluoride like NaF. For example, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), a strong base, will react with HF, F2 or NO2 molecules to form the non-toxic substances, which can be illustrated below.
HF + NaOH → NaF + H2O
2F2 + 4NaOH → 4NaF + O2 + 2H2O
2NO2 + 2NaOH → NaNO2 + NaNO3 + H2O
Furthermore, the by-product fluoride or fluoride-containing wastewater in semiconductor or optoelectronic industries may be converted to a valuable product (cryolite, Na3AlF6) by a crystallization process [36].

4. Conclusions

Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) have been widely used as industrial and commercial products, such as refrigerant, blowing agent, cleaning solvent, etching gas and extinguishing agent. In this paper, the trends of F-gases (i.e., HFCs, PFCs, SF6 and NF3) emissions and their sources from the industrial process and product use (IPPU) sector during the period of 2000-2020 have been analyzed. The findings showed significant increasing trend from 2,462 kilotons of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2eq) in 2000 to the peak value (i.e., 12,643 kilotons) of CO2eq in 2004. Subsequently, it decreased from 10,284 kilotons of CO2eq in 2005 (about 3.54% of the total GHG emissions in 2005) to 3,906 kilotons of CO2eq in 2020 (about 1.37% of the total GHG emissions in 2020), down by 69.1% compared to that in 2004. Obviously, these achievements were closely related to the progressive efforts by the regulatory requirements and the industry’s voluntary reduction strategies. Although the abatement technologies for controlling the F-gases emissions in the Taiwan’s semiconductor manufacturing and TFT-LCD industries can be based on material substitution and capture recovery-recycling technology, the current technology focused on thermal destruction-local scrubbing system. To further reduce the emissions of F-gases, the Kigali Amendment, which entered into force on 1 January 2019, added HFCs to the list of controlled substances under the Montreal Protocol. In this regard, the environment-friendly refrigerants with low GWP and high safety, including hydrofluoro-olefins (HFOs), hydrochlorofluoro-olefins (HCFOs) and hydrofluoro-ethers (HFEs), will be more and more used in the refrigeration and air-conditioning in the near future. Concerning the reduction of PFCs, SF6 and NF3 emissions, the thermal destruction-local scrubber approach will be the mainstream technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-T.T.; data collection, C.-H.T.; data analysis, C.-H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-T.T.; writing—review and editing, W.-T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Greenhouse Gases (World Meteorological Organization). Available online: https://public.wmo.int/en/our-mandate/focus-areas/environment/greenhouse-gases (accessed on 21 May 2023).
  2. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (United Nations Environment Programme). Available online: https://ozone.unep.org/treaties/montreal-protocol (accessed on 21 May 2023).
  3. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/ (accessed on 21 May 2023).
  4. Global Warming of 1.5 °C (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ (accessed on 21 May 2023).
  5. Sovacool, B.K.; Griffiths, S.; Kim, J.; Bazilian, M. Climate change and industrial F-gases: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options for reducing synthetic greenhouse gas emissions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 141, 110759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lindley, A.A.; McCulloch, A. Regulating to reduce emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases. J. Fluor. Chem. 2005, 126, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Müllerová, M.; Krtková, E.; Rošková, Z. F-gases: Trends, applications and newly applied gases in the Czech Republic. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sheldon, D.J.; Crimmin, M.R. Repurposing of F-gases: Challenges and opportunities in fluorine chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 4977–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Heath, E. Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Kigali Amendment). Int. Leg. Mater. 2017, 56, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Höglund-Isaksson, L.; Purohit, P.; Amann, M.; Bertok, I.; Rafaj, P.; Schöpp, W.; Borken-Kleefeld, J. Cost estimates of the Kigali Amendment to phase-down hydrofluorocarbons. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 75, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castro, P.J.; Aráujo, J.M.M.; Martinho, G.; Pereiro, A.B. Waste management strategies to mitigate the effects of fluorinated greenhouse gases on climate change. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Environmental Protection Administration (EPA). Taiwan Greenhouse Gases Inventory; EPA: Taipei, Taiwan, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. Trade Statistics (Customs Administration, Ministry of Finance, Taiwan). Available online: https://portal.sw.nat.gov.tw/APGA/GA30 (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  14. Tsai, W.T.; Lin, Y.Q. Trend Analysis of air quality index (AQI) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Taiwan and their regulatory countermeasures. Environments 2021, 8, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miller, B.R.; Rigby, M.; Kuijpers, L.J.M.; Krummel, P.B.; Steele, L.P.; Leist, M.; Fraser, P.J.; McCulloch, A.; Harth, C.; Salameh, P.; et al. HFC-23 (CHF3) emission trend response to HCFC-22 (CHClF2) production and recent HFC-23 emission abatement measures. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 7875–7890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050 (National Development Council, Taiwan). Available online: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/Content_List.aspx?n=B927D0EDB57A7A3A&upn=A2B386E427ED5689 (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  17. Tsai, W.T.; Chen, H.P.; Hsieh, W.Y. (2002) A review of uses, environmental hazards and recovery/recycle technologies of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) emissions from the semiconductor manufacturing processes. J. Loss. Prev. Process Ind. 2002, 15, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsai, W.T. An overview of environmental hazards and exposure risk of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Chemosphere 2005, 61, 1539–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tsai, W.T. The decomposition products of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6): Reviews of environmental and health risk analysis. J. Fluor. Chem. 2007, 128, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsai, W.T. Environmental and health risk analysis of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), a toxic and potent greenhouse gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 159, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsai, W.T. Environmental hazards and health risk of common liquid perfluoro-n-alkanes, potent greenhouse gases. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, L.T.; Hu, A.H. Voluntary GHG reduction of industrial sectors in Taiwan. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cheng, J.H.; Bartos, S.C.; Lee, W.M.; Li, S.N.; Lu, J. SF6 usage and emission trends in the TFT-LCD industry. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 17, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Available online: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  25. Laws and Regulations Database (Ministry of Justice, Taiwan). Available online: https://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/index.aspx (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  26. Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association. Available online: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  27. Taiwan Panel & Solution Association. Available online: http://www.tpasa.org.tw/ (accessed on 2 May 2023).
  28. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) 2021 Sustainability Report. Available online: https://esg.tsmc.com/download/file/2021_sustainabilityReport/english/e-all.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  29. Weiss, R.F.; Mühle, J.; Salameh, P.K.; Harth, C.M. Nitrogen trifluoride in the global atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35, L20821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, M.S.; Huang, K.H. Recycling and reuse of industrial wastes in Taiwan. Waste Manag. 2001, 21, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsai, W.T.; Chou, Y.H.; Lin, C.M.; Hsu, H.C.; Lin, K.Y.; Chiu, C.S. Perspectives on resource recycling from municipal solid waste in Taiwan. Resour. Policy 2007, 32, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsai, W.T. Current practice and policy for transforming E-waste into urban mining: Case study in Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag. 2019, 23, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tsai, W.T. Recycling of waste electrical & electronic equipment (WEEE) and its toxics-containing management in Taiwan- A case study. Toxics 2020, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Chang, B.L.; Tsai, C.J. Greenhouses gases surveillance and reduction research: A case study in a TFT-LED factory (in Chinese). Ind. Pollut. Prev. Control 2006, 25, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  35. Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program (US environmental Protection Agency). Available online: https://www.epa.gov/snap (accessed on 18 May 2023).
  36. Lee, S.J.; Ryu, I.S.; Jeon, S.G.; Moon, S.-H. Emission sources and mitigation of fluorinated Non-CO2 greenhouse gas in registered CDM projects. Greenhouse Gases Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 74428 g001
Figure 1. Proportion variations on emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) in Taiwan since 2000.
Figure 1. Proportion variations on emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) in Taiwan since 2000.
Preprints 74428 g001
Preprints 74428 g002
Figure 2. Percentages of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) emissions from IPPU sector in Taiwan by (a) 2000, (b) 2004, (c) 2008, (d) 2012, (e) 2016, and (f) 2020.
Figure 2. Percentages of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) emissions from IPPU sector in Taiwan by (a) 2000, (b) 2004, (c) 2008, (d) 2012, (e) 2016, and (f) 2020.
Preprints 74428 g002
Table 1. Environmental properties of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) mainly used in Taiwan 1.
Table 1. Environmental properties of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) mainly used in Taiwan 1.
Preprints 74428 i001
1 Source [3]. 2 Global warming potential (GWP) for 100-year time horizon. 3 Based on the imported statistics in recent years [13].
Table 2. Total emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases since 2000 in Taiwan. 1.
Table 2. Total emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases since 2000 in Taiwan. 1.
Year HFCs PFCs SF6 NF3 Total
2000 2,319 13 120 10 2,462
2001 2,619 2,939 746 235 6,538
2002 2,216 4,143 3,914 398 10,671
2003 2,397 4,198 4,385 540 11,520
2004 2,451 4,341 5,193 659 12,643
2005 1,098 3,470 4,951 765 10,284
2006 1,015 3,664 3,858 688 9,225
2007 1,122 3,372 3,381 798 8,673
2008 1,074 2,082 2,912 204 6,273
2009 1,081 1,560 2,452 577 5,607
2010 971 1,770 2,218 258 5,217
2011 1,053 1,781 1,918 420 5,172
2012 907 1,141 1,852 388 4,288
2013 1,019 1,345 1,997 773 5,134
2014 1,048 1,556 1,730 667 5,001
2015 1,020 1,347 1,523 662 4,552
2016 1,026 1,441 1,418 472 4,356
2017 1,023 1,409 1,416 440 4,298
2018 1,013 1,536 1,302 509 4,360
2019 1,027 1,420 935 473 3,855
2020 1,053 1,447 842 564 3,906
1 Source [12]; unit: kilotons of CO2eq.
Table 3. Total emissions of fluorinated GHGs (F-gases) from IPPU sector since 2000 in Taiwan. 1.
Table 3. Total emissions of fluorinated GHGs (F-gases) from IPPU sector since 2000 in Taiwan. 1.
Year Emission source 2 Total
2 B 2 C 2 E 2 F 2 G
2000 2,319 0 143 0 0 2,462
2001 2,567 0 3,971 0 0 6,538
2002 2,157 1,027 5,544 0 1,943 10,671
2003 1,937 1,027 6,212 401 1,943 11,520
2004 1,710 1,357 6,841 682 2,053 12,643
2005 0 1,063 6,722 996 1,503 10,284
2006 0 770 6,789 896 770 9,225
2007 0 440 6,358 922 953 8,673
2008 0 144 4,305 929 895 6,273
2009 0 235 3,857 812 703 5,607
2010 0 57 4,152 770 238 5,217
2011 0 50 3,989 881 252 5,172
2012 0 30 3,280 783 195 4,288
2013 0 38 4,124 812 160 5,134
2014 0 33 3,995 828 146 5,001
2015 0 43 3,530 851 128 4,552
2016 0 41 3,398 835 82 4,356
2017 0 59 3,329 821 79 4,298
2018 0 81 3,319 811 149 4,360
2019 0 43 2,856 846 110 3,855
2020 0 36 2,876 861 133 3,906
1 Source [12]; unit: kilotons of CO2eq. 2 Emission source notations; 2 B: Chemical industry, 2 C: Metal process, 2 E: Electronics industry, 2 F: Alternatives to ozone-depleting substances, 2 G: Manufacturing and use of other products.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated