1. Introduction
Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative diseases characterized by the abnormal accumulation of brain iron and the progressive degeneration of the nervous system. One of the recently identified subtypes of NBIA is β-propeller protein-associated neurodegeneration (BPAN) also known as neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation type 5, a rare neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorder [
1].
Children affected by BPAN commonly present with developmental delay, seizures, and sleep disorders [
2,
3,
4]. Later in life, individuals typically develop dementia and parkinsonism [
5]. Affected males have been rarely reported in the literature, as this disorder was first considered to be embryonic lethal in males [
6,
7]. Despite inheriting two X-chromosomes, females can also be affected because X-chromosome inactivation enables only one of two X-chromosomes to be expressed per cell. Recently, a broader phenotypic spectrum with less severe outcomes has been identified as next generation sequencing has become more accessible [
3]. This suggests that pathogenic variants in
WDR45 may encompass subtypes of distinct disorders or that children with BPAN exist on a spectrum of phenotypes. It is difficult to diagnose BPAN based on clinical features [
8]. Currently, the diagnosis is often established after whole-exome sequencing.
BPAN is frequently caused by de novo pathogenic variants in
WDR45 (WD repeat domain 45), a gene with X-linked dominant inheritance encoding a β-propeller protein involved in lysosomal autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis [
9,
10]. These heterozygous mutations involve both missense and truncation mutations that lead to the loss of WDR45 function [
3,
7].
WDR45/WIPI4 is a WD-repeat β-propeller protein that belongs to the WIPI (WD repeat domain, phosphoinositide interacting) family. The precise cellular function of WDR45 is still largely unknown, but deletions or conventional variants in
WDR45 can lead to macroautophagy/autophagy defects, malfunctioning mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum stress and unbalanced iron homeostasis [
11].
WDR45 regulates autophagy, an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of the degradation and recycling of dysfunctional cellular components [
12]. WDR45 deficiency in BPAN patients and cellular animal models may result in defects in autophagic flux [
13,
14]. However, how WDR45 deficiency leads to brain iron overload remains unclear. The upregulation of toxic iron in the fibroblasts of two BPAN-affected patients [
15] suggests that alterations in iron homeostasis are associated with WDR45 deficiency. Furthermore, reports on fibroblasts and pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons from a female patient with BPAN have shown elevated iron levels and mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunction [
16].
In
WDR45-KO cells, it has been demonstrated that the loss of WDR45 led to defects in ferritinophagy [
17], a form of autophagy that degrades the iron storage protein ferritin, contributing iron accumulation in WDR45-KO cells. Iron accumulation was also detected in the mitochondria, which was accompanied by impaired mitochondrial respiration, elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS), and increased cell death [
17].
Ferritinophagy is one of the mechanisms that could link the roles of WDR45 in autophagy to iron homeostasis. Ferritinophagy is the process through which the intracellular iron storage protein ferritin is sequestered within autophagosomes and delivered to lysosomes for degradation [
18]. This process is crucial in liberating iron from ferritin and thus in maintaining cellular iron homeostasis [
18]. Because of the role of WDR45 in autophagy, it is plausible that WDR45 deficiency promotes defects in ferritinophagy, which may contribute to iron accumulation [
17,
19,
20]. However, the molecular mechanisms that link alterations in autophagy function to changes in iron levels by WDR45 deficiency remain unknown.
Rodent models further reveal the critical roles of WDR45 in neuronal development and survival. Neuron-specific wdr45-knockout (KO) mice display poor motor coordination, learning and memory defects, and extensive axon swelling [
14]. The primary neuronal cells in these mice show defects in autophagic flux, with the accumulation of ubiquitin-positive aggregates in both neurons and axons [
14]. In addition, constitutive wdr45-KO mice display cognitive impairments, abnormal synaptic transmission, and lesions in several brain regions [
10]. The defect in autophagy caused by WDR45 deficiency leads to elevated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and neuronal apoptosis [
16], which is consistent with neurodegeneration found in BPAN patients.
Iron is an essential trace element required by almost all living organisms [
21]. As the most metabolically active organ in the body, the brain requires iron for oxidative metabolism, myelination, mitochondrial energy generation, and the biosynthesis of neurotransmitters [
22]. However, excess iron becomes toxic because of the generation of ROS through Fenton reaction, resulting in oxidative stress and directly damaging DNA, lipids, and proteins [
23]. Therefore, the brain requires precise iron homeostasis to guard against iron accumulation while providing the optimal level of this nutrient, which is essential for its development and functions. Recently, our group has proposed that lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation are interconnected pathological processes that reinforce each other and may aggravate and accelerate the progression of neurodegenerative diseases [
24].
This study aimed to examine autophagic defects, iron accumulation, lipid peroxidation and bioenergetics defects in WDR45-mutant cellular models from two patients with BPAN. In addition, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of antioxidants such as pantothenate, vitamin E and α-lipoic acid on pathological alterations.
3. Discussion
Mutant WDR45 induces diverse cellular consequences including autophagy defects, malfunctioning of mitochondria, mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation, implying that WDR45 protein functions in diverse pathways that directly or indirectly regulate essential cellular processes [
17,
19,
20,
33,
34]. However, the casual, functional, and temporal sequence of pathological events such as deficient autophagosome formation (with consequences in mitochondrial renewal or ferritinophagy), impaired cell bioenergetics (with consequences in many cellular energy-dependent functions) and altered lipid and iron metabolism (with consequences in cell death by ferroptosis) have not yet been clarified.
In this manuscript, we demonstrated molecular changes in mutant BPAN cells comprising altered autophagy, decreased levels of lysosomal proteins and enzymes, impaired mitochondrial bioenergetics and network, increased mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation, confirming the pathogenicity of the WDR45 variants. The protein and mRNA expression levels of WDR45 gene were decreased in patient-derived fibroblasts. The amount of increase in LC3B-II upon treatment with an autophagy inducer or inhibitor was also reduced in mutant cells compared to control cells, suggesting decreased autophagosome formation and impaired autophagic flux. Interestingly, TEM showed mitochondrial vacuolization and the accumulation of lipofuscin-like dense aggregates. Decreased lysosomal membrane and enzymes markers also suggested that besides autophagosome formation the whole autophagic degradation process is altered in WDR45-mutant fibroblasts. The TEM analysis also showed RER distension suggesting that vesicular traffic and the transport of proteins trough the exocytosis pathway is altered [
35]. Thus, the decrease content of membrane and lysosomal enzymes can be explained by the disruption of protein transport from RER to lysosomes.
In line with this, we confirmed altered autophagic flux in BPAN cells as previously shown in other patient-derived cell lines [
7,
16]. Accordingly, decreased LC3B-II levels in WDR45- mutant patient’s fibroblasts in the presence and absence of bafilomycin A1 indicated impaired autophagosome formation and maturation. These findings were also confirmed by using the Tandem Sensor RFP-GFP-LC3B assay which identifies autophagic vesicles at different stages. Both autophagosome and autolysosome were significantly reduced in BPAN fibroblasts at basal conditions and after chloroquine treatment.
Lysosomal enzymes deficiency in BPAN cells may inhibit the lysosomal clearance of autophagic cargo [
36] and therefore may aggravate autophagy failure. Moreover, the impaired autophagosome formation and the depletion of lysosomal enzymes have also been known to trigger dysfunction of mitochondria (the main cellular storage organelles for iron besides lysosomes) by inhibiting mitochondrial renewal by mitophagy [
37]. Indeed, we here showed an altered mitochondrial bioenergetics and network and decreased mitochondrial protein levels in mutant BPAN fibroblasts indicating disrupted mitochondrial integrity that may be caused by an excess of redox-active iron in mitochondria and the resulting ROS generation and lipid peroxidation [
38] and/or by the inhibition of mitophagy [
37]. These data support the hypothesis that WDR45 mutations lead to autophagic defects resulting in abnormalities in iron-containing organelles such as mitochondria.
One essential question is how and where iron is accumulated in BPAN fibroblasts. Diaw et al observed that compared to increased levels of the ferritinophagy marker Nuclear Coactivator 4 (NCOA4) in control cells upon iron treatment, patients’ cells revealed unchanged NCOA4 protein levels, indicating disturbed ferritinophagy [
19]. They conclude that dysfunctional WDR45 might cause deficits in autophagy-like ferritinophagy and, thereby, contributing to disrupted iron homeostasis and ferroptosis, resulting in neurodegeneration in BPAN. Corroborating this hypothesis, Aring et al have reported that impaired ferritinophagy contributes to iron accumulation in WDR45-knockout (KO) SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line [
17]. However, our findings indicate that ferritin has decreased expression levels in BPAN cells suggesting that iron is unlikely accumulated in this iron storage protein. Our results showed that iron accumulation is dependent on mitochondrial lipid peroxidation because antioxidants prevented iron overload in BPAN fibroblasts. In addition, BPAN cells also showed increased Sudan black staining and autofluorescence, and TEM analysis revealed the presence of lipofuscin-like dense aggregates. When mitochondria become age they are digested by lysosomes during mitophagy [
39]. However, if the activity of the autophagy machinery and lysosomes is insufficient, then mitochondria can be degraded into granules of lipofuscin (LF) to eliminate the most damaged parts of the mitochondrion. Antioxidants were able to prevent this process. These studies led us to postulate the alternative hypothesis that that iron is accumulated in lipofuscin granules that are likely originated from undegraded dysfunctional mitochondria through a process similar to mitoptosis [
40,
41]. It seems possible that under conditions when autophagosome formation fail and consequently mitophagy cannot recycle dysfunctional mitochondria, mitoptosis-like mechanisms may provide cellular protection from malfunctioning of damaged mitochondria. Interestingly, antioxidants prevent the formation of lipofuscin-like aggregates but had not a positive effect on mitochondrial dysfunction or bioenergetic failure. Recently, our group has reported that iron is accumulated in lipofuscin granules in cellular models of pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) and PLA2G6-associated neurodegeneration (PLAN), two NBIA disorders [
27,
28].
Lipofuscin formation has been explained through different mechanisms. Nowadays, two main hypotheses are postulated, the lysosomal and mitochondrial origin of lipofuscin. The lysosomal hypothesis states that lysosomal lipid peroxidation causes lysosomal dysfunction with increased iron permeability through lysosomal membrane. Then, intralysosomal iron produces hydroxyl radicals by Fenton reaction which cause oxidation of lipid and proteins that accumulate in undegradable aggregates [
42,
43,
44,
45]. Lipid peroxidation by-products form lipids and proteins adducts which have autofluorescence properties [
45]. In addition, altered secondary lysosomes can fuse with other damaged lysosomes leading to lipofuscin accumulation [
42,
43,
44,
46]. The lysosomal origin of lipofuscin formation is also related with its mitochondrial origin because damaged mitochondrial renewal can be impaired by low mitophagy and the release of iron by mitochondria in autolysosomes which trigger more Fenton reaction and lipid peroxidation [
42,
47]. Mitophagy, a selective form of mitochondrial degradation, eliminate ROS-damaged mitochondria, while impaired mitophagy leads to the accumulation of damaged proteins and lipids in mitochondria [
48]. The Mitochondrial-Lysosomal Axis Theory, hypothesized by Brunk U.T. and Terman A. in 2002, explains the interconnections between both lipofuscinogenesis origins [
49,
50]. Lipofuscin formation can be also produced by impaired mitochondrial fission without alteration of the autophagosome-lysosome system [
44,
51]. The mitochondrial origin of lipofuscin is based on the fact that these organelles contain the main reserve of cellular iron [
52] which can contribute to mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and damage of mitochondrial integrity and function. In turn, lipid peroxidation by-products alter the mitochondrial membranes and facilitates lipofuscin formation [
53]. Literature describes different mechanisms of mitochondrial lipofuscinogenesis as a result of lipid peroxidation, without lysosomal participation [
51].
WDR45 deficiency also leads to altered mitochondrial metabolism, and enhanced ROS production, thus potentially contributing to neuronal cell death and neurodegeneration [
17]. Mitochondria are cellular organelles that beside of performing many bioenergetic, biosynthetic, and regulatory functions, also play a fundamental role in iron metabolism [
52]. Most cells take up iron through receptor-mediated endocytosis and it is transported to the mitochondria for the biosynthesis of essential protein cofactors involved in redox reactions. For this reason, mitochondrial iron levels should be tightly regulated to provide sufficient iron for numerous cellular processes that use iron as a co-factor, including many proteins of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, while avoiding ROS generation by an excess of redox-active iron [
38]. Thus, mitochondrial iron accumulation has been implicated in many neurodegenerative diseases [
54,
55].
In this work, we found that WDR45 deficiency leads to impaired mitochondrial respiration and increased mitochondrial lipid peroxidation. Consistent with mitochondrial dysfunction, we found markedly reduced levels of nDNA and mtDNA-encoded mitochondrial proteins. We hypothesize that WDR45 deficiency leads to impaired renewal of mitochondria and therefore, the accumulation of oxidized lipids and proteins, which induce mitochondrial dysfunction and increased ROS production. These abnormal mitochondria with increasing levels of oxidized lipid and proteins and iron undergo a process of mitochondrial vacuolization while damaged mitochondrial components become dense aggregates which are eventually extruded to the cytosol and finally form lipofuscin-like granules.
As antioxidants can be effective in blocking the vicious cycle of lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation [
24,
28] we evaluated the effect of pantothenate, vitamin E and α-lipoic acid on the main pathological alterations in BPAN mutant cells. Antioxidants cocktail were able to significantly eliminate mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and iron overload as well as RER dilation. However, they did not have a significant effect on autophagy defect or cell bioenergetics. These data suggest that iron accumulation in BPAN cells is caused by lipid peroxidation and that both alterations are secondary to the main autophagy defect.
The oxidation of mitochondrial lipids with the concomitant lack of mitochondrial renewal by mitophagy due to the lack of autophasome formation may lead to the formation of iron-rich lipofuscin granules [
27]. However, the prevention of mitochondrial lipid peroxidation by antioxidants did not prevent mitochondrial malfunctioning and the bioenergetics failure. Nevertheless, antioxidants supplementation reduced RER dilation suggesting that oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation is also involved in ER stress in BPAN cells. RER stress has been linked to oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of numerous diseases [
56].
Pantothenate, also called pantothenic acid or Vitamin B5, is the primary precursor of coenzyme A (CoA), crucial in several cellular processes such as carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism [
57]. Both, the direct form (CoA) or the acetylated form (acetyl-CoA) are involved in energy production and respiration, via the citric acid cycle. It is essential for fatty acid synthesis and β-oxidation, and for cholesterol, lipid, and sphingolipid biosynthesis, as well as for the production of steroid hormones and neurotransmitters, i.e., acetylcholine [
58,
59]. Further, acetyl-CoA plays a role in global histone acetylation, modulating gene expression, cell growth, and proliferation [
60]. Pantothenic acid, due to the increase of CoA, exerts an antioxidative property and enhances glutathione levels and, in animal models, high concentrations protect neurons from radiation damages [
61,
62,
63]. In fact, pantothenate by stimulating the synthesis of CoA may facilitate the activation of fatty acids required for membrane phospholipids remodeling and repair by the Land`s cycle [
64], and therefore indirectly may prevent lipid peroxidation. In fact, pantothenate supplementation was able to correct lipid peroxidation in cellular models of pantothenathe kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) [
27].
Vitamin E, which comprises a family of tocopherols and tocotrienols, has a powerful lipid antioxidant activity that prevents lipid peroxidation [
65]. The protective role of vitamin E in the maintenance of neurological health has been established for many years [
66]. Furthermore, the potential protective effects of vitamin E supplementation have been suggested in several neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer´s disease or Friedreich´s Ataxia, among others [
65,
66]. Vitamin E, a blocker of lipid peroxidation propagation and an efficient ferroptosis inhibitor, has been reported to reduce lipid peroxidation and iron/lipofuscin accumulation and correct mitochondrial dysfunction and the main pathological alterations in PLAN cellular models [
46].
In addition, it is well known that α-lipoic acid is one of the most efficient antioxidants [
67] due to its good bioavailability, blood-brain barrier crossing ability and lack of toxic effects at therapeutic doses. Many clinical studies proved beneficial effect of α-lipoic acid in many pathological conditions such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, heart diseases, cataract, and neurodegenerative diseases [
68]. In addition, as mentioned before, α-lipoic acid acts as antioxidant to directly scavenge almost all forms of free radicals (oxygen and nitrogen), chelate transition and heavy metal ions and mediate the recycling of other endogenous antioxidants such as vitamin E, glutathione, and ascorbate [
69]. In addition, α-lipoic acid has a protective role against lipid peroxidation [
70,
71]. Furthermore, α-lipoic acid modulates various signalling cascades either by receptor mediated or non-receptor-mediated processes [
67]. Recently, our research group has shown that α-lipoic acid supplementation can improve the pathological alterations in cellular models of PKAN with residual PANK2 expression levels by a mechanism involving the up-regulation of PANK2 transcription and enzyme expression levels [
72].
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Reagents
Monoclonal Anti-Actin antibody, Vitamin E, pantothenate, α-lipoic acid, Sudan Black B, Perl’s Prussian Blue, sodium pantothenate, Luperox® DI, deferiprone, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), bafilomycin A1, glutaraldehyde 25% Aqueous Solution and trypsin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). MitoTrackerTM Red CMXRos, MitoTrackerTM Deep Red FM, BODIPY® 581/ 591 C11, anti-ISCU (Iron-Sulfur Cluster Assembly Enzyme), anti-WDR45 (WD repeat domain 45), anti-FXN (Frataxin) Premo™ Autophagy Tandem Sensor RFP-GFP-LC3B Kit, LysoTracker™ Green DND-26, DAPI and Hoechst 3342, were purchased from ThermoScientific™ (Waltham, MA, USA). MitoPeDPP was purchased from Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA). Anti-ULK1 (Unc-51 Like Autophagy Activating Kinase 1), anti-BECN1 (Coiled-Coil Myosin-Like BCL2-Interacting Protein), anti-TFEB (Transcription Factor EB), anti-LAMP1 (Lysosomal Associated Membrane Protein 1), anti-LAMP2 (Lysosomal Associated Membrane Protein 2), anti-GBA1 (-glucosidase) and anti-CATC (Cathepsin-C), anti-ferritin light-chain (FT), anti-SLC40A1 (Ferroportin-1), anti-IRP1 (Iron-Responsive Element-Binding Protein 1) and anti-NFS1 (NFS1 Cysteine desulfurase) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).A cocktail of protease inhibitors (complete cocktail) was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN, USA). The Immun-Star HRP substrate kit and DC (detergent compatible) protein assay were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. (Hercules, CA).
Anti-P62 (Autophagy Receptor P62) and anti-LC3B (Microtubule-Associated Proteins 1A/1B Light Chain 3B), anti-TFR1 (Transferrin receptor protein 1), anti-NCOA4 (Nuclear receptor coactivator 4), anti-FTMT (Mitochondrial Ferritin), anti-MFRN2 (Mitoferrin-2), Anti-MTND1(Mitochondrially Encoded NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Core Subunit 1) , anti-COX2 (Mitochondrially Encoded Cytochrome C Oxidase II) , anti-COX4 (Mitochondrially Encoded Cytochrome C Oxidase II), anti-NDUFS4 (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit S4), anti-VDAC1 (Voltage-dependent anion channels) and anti-PGC1 (PPARG Coactivator 1) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-ATG12-ATG5 (Autophagy Related 12- Autophagy Related 5) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Massachusetts, USA).
anti-DMT1(Divalent Metal Transporter 1) was purchased from EMD Millipore. XF Mito-stress test kit including oligomycin, carbonyl cyanide ptrifluoromethoxy- phenylhydrazone (FCCP), rotenone & antimycin A was obtained from Seahorse Bioscience Inc. (Billerica, MA, USA), as well as the XFe24 cell culture plates, sensor cartridges (Seahorse XFe FluxPax) and Seahorse XF base medium.
4.2. Patient Cell Cultures
We used primary skin fibroblasts from two unaffected subjects of the same age and sex (controls 1, 2) purchased from ATCC and two patients. One BPAN patient (P1) carried a frame shift mutation c.400C>T (p.Arg134*) that results in a truncated WDR45 protein while patient P2 carried a c.182A>C mutation. This variant leads to an amino acid change from an asparagine to a threonine at position 61 of the protein (p.Asn61Thr). Control values represent means ± SD for two control fibroblast cell lines. Fibroblasts were grown in DMEM (Sigma) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma), 100-mg/ml streptomycin, 100-U/ml penicillin, and 4-mM l-glutamine (Sigma). All the experiments were performed with fibroblasts cell cultures with a passage number < 10.
4.3. Immunoblotting
Western blotting was performed using standard methods. After protein transfer, the membrane was incubated with various primary antibodies diluted 1:1000 and then with the corresponding secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase at a 1:10000 dilution. Specific protein complexes were identified using the Immun-Star HRP substrate kit (Biorad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).
4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Expression of WDR45 gene in fibroblasts was analysed by real time quantitative PCR using mRNA extracts. mRNA was extracted by using standard methods and SYBR Green protocol as a method designed to detect accurate quantification of gene expression and RT-PCR reactions. WDR45 primers used 5’-TTTACGGTTCCGGGTACTGG-3’ (Forward primer) and 5’-AATTTCAACCTCCACCAGCG -3’ (Reverse primer) amplifying a sequence of 98 nucleotides. Actin was used as a housekeeping control gene and the primers were 5’- AGAGCTACGAGCTGCCTGAC -3’ (Forward primer) and 3’- AGCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG -5’ (reverse primer).
4.5. Inmunofluorescence Microscopy
Fibroblasts were grown on 1 mm width (Goldseal No. 1) glass coverslips for 24–48 h in DMEM containing 20% FBS. Cells were rinsed once with PBS, fixed in 3.8% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature and permeabilized in 0.1% saponin for 5 min. For immunostaining, glass coverslips were incubated with primary antibodies diluted 1:100 in PBS, 1–2 h at 37 °C in a humidified chamber. Unbound antibodies were removed by washing the coverslips with PBS (three times, 5 min). The secondary antibody, a FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antibody, or a tetramethyl rhodamine goat anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes), diluted 1:100 in PBS, were added and incubated for 1 h 37 °C. Coverslips were then rinsed with PBS for 3 min, incubated for 1 min with PBS containing Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/ml), and washed with PBS (three 5-min washes). Finally, the coverslips were mounted onto microscope slides using Vectashield Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and analyzed using an upright fluorescence microscope (Leica DMRE, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Colocalization studies were performed using a DeltaVision system (Applied Precision; Issaquah, WA) with an Olympus IX-71 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan).
4.6. Lysotracker Staining
LysoTracker is an acidotropic dye that stains cellular acidic compartments, including lysosomes and autolysosomes. For staining of lysosomes, 75 nM LysoTracker™ Green DND-26, was added 30 min (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The specimens were examined with a widefield fluorescence microscope using 40x objective. The number of Lysotracker-positive puncta was analysed in 100 individual cells. For fluorescence intensity measurements, mean fluorescence was analysed in randomly selected areas using the DeltaVision software (Applied Precision; Issaquah, WA, USA).
4.7. Tandem Sensor RFP- GFP-LC3B
Autophagic flux was monitored using the Premo™ Autophagy Tandem Sensor RFP-GFP-LC3B Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were treated with 10 μL of BacMam reagents containing the RFP-GFP-LC3B construct and were transduced with 40 particles per cell for 16 hours. After incubation, BacMam reagents were removed, and the cells were maintained for 48h in medium to normalize autophagy markers expression levels. Control cells were treated with 90 μM chloroquine (Component B) for 16 hours prior to experiment imaging. Hoechst 33342 staining was used to label cell nuclei. Images were analyzed for green fluorescence (LC3B positive autophagosomes) and red fluorescence (autolysosome formation) using a widefield fluorescence microscope using 40x objective. The colocalization of green and red fluorescence (GFP+RFP) is indicative of neutral pH autophagosomes, red fluorescence (RFP) is indicative of acidic pH autolysosomes. The number of positive puncta was analysed in 100 individual cells. Imaging was perfomed using the DeltaVision software (Applied Precision; Issaquah, WA, USA).
4.8. Iron and Lipofuscin Accumulation
Iron accumulation was examined by Prussian Blue staining [
73]. Prussian Blue staining was quantified in a microplate reader (Polar star Omega, BMG Labtech) and by light microscopy. Images and quantification analysis from light and fluorescence microscopy were performed by using the ImageJ software.
Lipofuscin accumulation was evaluated by Sudan Black B (SBB) staining as previously described [
74]. SSB staining quantification was performed in a microplate reader and by light microscopy. Autofluorescence detection was performed by fluorescence microscopy (excitation 366 nm; emission 420–600 nm). Emission spectra of lipofuscin granules were obtained by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon A1R, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan). Excitation laser source 405 nm. The spectra were detected in 10-nm steps. The emission spectra were recorded in 20 lipofuscin granules in 20 cells. Iron content in cell extracts were also determined by ICP-MS [
75]. Calibration was performed for six standards and the correlation coefficients (r) ranged from 0.98 to 0.99. Elemental concentrations are shown in nmol Fe2+/μg protein. Values are shown as means ± SD (standard deviation) for three independent experiments.
4.9. Iron Metabolism and Labile Iron Pool
Labile iron pool (LIP) determination was carried out as a slightly modifying of previously described [
30]. Briefly, fibroblasts were plated in 96-well plates. Cells were incubated in medium supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA and 0.25 μm Calcein-AM at 37°C for 15 min. After two washes with Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), cells were maintained in HBSS supplemented with 10 mm glucose for 10 min. Basal fluorescence was measured using a POLARstar Omega Microplate Reader at 485 nm (excitation) and 535 nm (emission). Cells were then supplemented with the specific iron chelator Salicyladehyde Isonicotinoyl Hydrazone (0.1 mM) for 15 min. Fluorescence was followed during incubation with the chelator, and when a plateau was reached, that value was considered to be the LIP value. Finally, the results were normalized to the protein content. Control cells were treated with 100 μM deferiprone as a negative control. TFR, DMT1, FT, NCOA4, SCL40A1, FTMT, MFRN2, FXN, NFS1, ISCU and IRP1 protein expression levels were determined by Western blotting.
4.10. TEM Analysis
The cells were seeded on 8-well Permanox chamber slides (Nunc, Thermo Scientific) and were subsequently fixed in tempered 3.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) for 10 min at 37 °C and 50 min for 4ºC. Cells were postfixed in 2% OsO4 for 1 h at room temperature, rinsed, dehydrated and embedded in Durcupan resin (Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich). Semithin sections (1.5 µm) were cut with a diamond knife and stained lightly with 1% toluidine blue. Later ultra-thin (70 nm) sections of the cells were cut with a diamond knife, stained with lead citrate (Reynolds solution) and examined under a transmision electron microscope (FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTwin) with a Xarosa (20 Megapixel resolution) digital camera using Radius image acquisition software (EMSIS GmbH, Münster, Germany).
4.11. Bioenergetic and Oxidative Stress Analysis
Mitochondrial respiratory function of control and BPAN fibroblasts were measured using mito-stress test assay by XF24 extracellular flux analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, Billerica, MA). Cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well in XF24 cell culture plates in 100-μL growth medium (DMEM medium containing 20% FBS) and placed in 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. After 24 h incubation, growth medium from each well was removed, leaving 50 μL of media. Then, cells were washed twice with 1000 μL of pre-warmed assay medium (XF base medium supplemented with 10-mM glucose, 1-mM glutamine, and 1-mM sodium pyruvate; pH 7.4) and 450 μL of assay medium (500 μL final) was added. Cells were incubated in 37 °C incubator without CO2 for 1 h to allow pre-equilibrating with the assay medium. Mitochondrial functionality was evaluated by sequential injection of four compounds that affect bioenergetics. The final concentrations of injections were 1-μM oligomycin, 2-μM FCCP (carbonyl cyanide-4-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone), 1-, and 2.5-μM rotenone/antimycin A. The best concentration of each inhibitor and uncoupler, as well as the optimal cells seeding density, were determined in preliminary analyses. A minimum of five wells per treatment were utilized in any given experiment. This assay allowed for an estimation of basal respiration, maximal respiration, and spare respiratory capacity.
Mitochondrial lipid peroxidation was assessed by measuring the oxidation of MitoPeDPP according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MitoPeDPP a cell-membrane-permeable probe, perylene-based dye. It specifically localizes in mitochondria due to the triphenylphosphonium moiety introduced. Mitochondrial localization of MitoPeDPP signal was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy of samples incubated with MitoPeDPP and MitoTracker™ Deep Red FM (100 nM, 45 min, 37ºC), a mitochondrial dye. Colocalization of both markers was assessed by the DeltaVision software calculating the Pearson coefficient of correlation.
4.12. Mitotracker Staining. Analysis of Mitochondrial Network
Cells were stained with MitoTracker Red CMXRos (100 nM, 45 min, 37ºC), a mitochondrial potential-dependent dye, and examined by fluorescence microscopy. The amount of mitochondrial fragmentation was evaluated using the Fiji software. For each experimental condition, a total of 100 cells collected in three different experiments were used to calculate the number of small, rounded mitochondria per cell. Length or ratio between the major and minor axis of the mitochondrion, degree of circularity and percentage of rounded/tubular mitochondria were taken into account.
4.13. Statistics
Statical analysis was routinely performed as formerly described by our research group [
76]. We used non-parametric statistics that do not have any distributional assumption in cases when the number of events was small (n<30) [
77]. In these cases, multiple groups were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test. In cases when number of events was higher (n>30), we applied parametric tests. In these cases, multiple groups were compared using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical analyses were conducted using the GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The data are reported as the mean±SD values or as representative of at least three independent experiments. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Figure 1.
Expression levels of autophagic proteins in BPAN fibroblasts. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Controls (C1 y C2) and BPAN patient cell lines (P1 and P2). Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against ULK1, BECN1, WDR45, ATG12-ATG5, LC3B, P62 and TFEB. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) WDR45 gene expression. WDR45 transcripts were quantified by RT-qPCR. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. Results were normalized to actin and referred to C1. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between BPAN and controls cells.
Figure 1.
Expression levels of autophagic proteins in BPAN fibroblasts. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Controls (C1 y C2) and BPAN patient cell lines (P1 and P2). Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against ULK1, BECN1, WDR45, ATG12-ATG5, LC3B, P62 and TFEB. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) WDR45 gene expression. WDR45 transcripts were quantified by RT-qPCR. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. Results were normalized to actin and referred to C1. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between BPAN and controls cells.
Figure 2.
Expression levels of lysosomal proteins in BPAN fibroblasts. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Control (C1 and C2) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2. Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against LAMP1, LAMP2, GBA1 and CATC. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between BPAN and controls cells. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 2.
Expression levels of lysosomal proteins in BPAN fibroblasts. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Control (C1 and C2) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2. Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against LAMP1, LAMP2, GBA1 and CATC. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between BPAN and controls cells. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 3.
Autophagic flux in Control and BPAN cell lines. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Control (C1) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2 untreated (-) and treated (+) with 100 nM of the autophagy inhibitor bafilomycin A1 (Baf1) for 6 hours. Blots were immunostained with antibodies against LC3B and P62. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005, ****p<0.0001 between BPAN cells and control; ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of Bafilomycin A1. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 3.
Autophagic flux in Control and BPAN cell lines. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Control (C1) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2 untreated (-) and treated (+) with 100 nM of the autophagy inhibitor bafilomycin A1 (Baf1) for 6 hours. Blots were immunostained with antibodies against LC3B and P62. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005, ****p<0.0001 between BPAN cells and control; ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of Bafilomycin A1. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 4.
Iron accumulation in BPAN cells. (A) Prussian Blue staining of control cells (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) cultured in 6-well plates as described in Material and Methods. The staining solution was removed to visualize the stained cells on the bottom of the wells. P1 fibroblasts treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF) for 72 hours were used as a negative control. Scale bar =20 μm. (B) Quantification of Prussian Blue staining Images were analyzed by the Image J software. (C) Iron content determined by ICP-MS. Total iron content of control and BPAN patients was determined by ICP-MS as described in Material and Methods. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.005 between BPAN fibroblasts and controls; ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of DEF. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 4.
Iron accumulation in BPAN cells. (A) Prussian Blue staining of control cells (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) cultured in 6-well plates as described in Material and Methods. The staining solution was removed to visualize the stained cells on the bottom of the wells. P1 fibroblasts treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF) for 72 hours were used as a negative control. Scale bar =20 μm. (B) Quantification of Prussian Blue staining Images were analyzed by the Image J software. (C) Iron content determined by ICP-MS. Total iron content of control and BPAN patients was determined by ICP-MS as described in Material and Methods. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.005 between BPAN fibroblasts and controls; ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of DEF. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 5.
Lipofuscin-like aggregates in BPAN fibroblasts. (A) Representative autofluorescence and bright field (BF) images of Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) untreated and treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF) for 72 hours. Scale Bar= 20 μm. (B) Sudan black staining of control and BPAN fibroblasts. (C) Quantification of autofluorescence by image analysis using the Fiji software. (D) Quantification of Sudan black BPAN cells and control (C1). (E) The autofluorescence spectra of lipofuscin granules measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon A1R, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan) in Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts. P1 was untreated and treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF). Excitation laser source: 405 nm. The emission spectra were recorded in 20 large lipofuscin granules in 20 cells. Results are expressed as mean±SD of autofluorescence intensity. **p<0.005 between control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05, ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of DEF. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 5.
Lipofuscin-like aggregates in BPAN fibroblasts. (A) Representative autofluorescence and bright field (BF) images of Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) untreated and treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF) for 72 hours. Scale Bar= 20 μm. (B) Sudan black staining of control and BPAN fibroblasts. (C) Quantification of autofluorescence by image analysis using the Fiji software. (D) Quantification of Sudan black BPAN cells and control (C1). (E) The autofluorescence spectra of lipofuscin granules measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon A1R, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan) in Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts. P1 was untreated and treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF). Excitation laser source: 405 nm. The emission spectra were recorded in 20 large lipofuscin granules in 20 cells. Results are expressed as mean±SD of autofluorescence intensity. **p<0.005 between control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05, ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of DEF. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 6.
Electron microscopy images of Control and P1 and P2 fibroblasts. (A) Representative images of semithin sections of 1,5 µm stained with toluidine blue and visualized by light microscope. Scale bar=15 μM. (B) Representative electron microscopy images of Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) Top panel scale bar=10 μm; botton panel=1 μm. White arrows, lipofuscin-like granules. (C) Quantification of lipofuscin-like aggregates. Data represent the mean±SD of the examination of 50 cells per condition. *p<0.05 between BPAN cell and controls.
Figure 6.
Electron microscopy images of Control and P1 and P2 fibroblasts. (A) Representative images of semithin sections of 1,5 µm stained with toluidine blue and visualized by light microscope. Scale bar=15 μM. (B) Representative electron microscopy images of Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) Top panel scale bar=10 μm; botton panel=1 μm. White arrows, lipofuscin-like granules. (C) Quantification of lipofuscin-like aggregates. Data represent the mean±SD of the examination of 50 cells per condition. *p<0.05 between BPAN cell and controls.
Figure 7.
Expression levels of proteins related with iron metabolism. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Controls (C1 and C2) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2. Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against SLC40A1, TFR1, DMT1, FT, MFRN2, FTMT, NCO4A, FXN, NFS1 and ISCU. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. For control cells (C1 and C2), data are the mean±SD of the two control cell lines. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between BPAN cells and controls. A.U., arbitrary units. (C) Iron labile pool. LIP in control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1and P2) assayed as described in Material and Methods. Control cells treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF) for 24 hours were used as negative control. For control cells, data are mean±SD of three control cell lines. *p<0.05 between control and BPAN fibroblasts. ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of DEF. Data represent the mean±SD of six separate experiments.
Figure 7.
Expression levels of proteins related with iron metabolism. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Controls (C1 and C2) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2. Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against SLC40A1, TFR1, DMT1, FT, MFRN2, FTMT, NCO4A, FXN, NFS1 and ISCU. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. For control cells (C1 and C2), data are the mean±SD of the two control cell lines. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between BPAN cells and controls. A.U., arbitrary units. (C) Iron labile pool. LIP in control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1and P2) assayed as described in Material and Methods. Control cells treated with 100 μM deferiprone (DEF) for 24 hours were used as negative control. For control cells, data are mean±SD of three control cell lines. *p<0.05 between control and BPAN fibroblasts. ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of DEF. Data represent the mean±SD of six separate experiments.
Figure 8.
Bioenergetics analysis of control and BPAN fibroblasts. Basal (A) and maximal (B) respiration, and Spare Respiratory capacity (C) were determined in controls (C1 and C2) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) by using the Seahorse analyzer as described in Material and Methods. *p<0.05, **p<0.005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts.
Figure 8.
Bioenergetics analysis of control and BPAN fibroblasts. Basal (A) and maximal (B) respiration, and Spare Respiratory capacity (C) were determined in controls (C1 and C2) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) by using the Seahorse analyzer as described in Material and Methods. *p<0.05, **p<0.005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts.
Figure 9.
Mitochondrial Lipid peroxidation in Control and BPAN cells and the effect of antioxidants treatment. Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated (+) with a cocktail of 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate for 7 days. (A) Levels of Mitochondrial lipid peroxidation in untreated (-) and treated (+) control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) assayed by MitoPeDPP staining as described in Material and Methods. (B) MitoPeDPP staining quantification was performed by using the Fiji software. Cells were incubated with MitoTrackerTM Deep Red FM to demonstrate that MitoPeDPP signal colocalizes with a mitochondrial marker. Control fibroblasts were treated with 500 μM Luperox (LUP, Tert-butyl hydroperoxide) for 15 min as positive control of lipid peroxidation. Colocalization of both markers MitoPeDPP and MitoTracker was assessed by the DeltaVision software calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. Pearson correlation coefficient was >0,75 in BPAN fibroblasts and control+LUP. Scale bar= 20 μm. *p<0.05, **p<0.05 between control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05 between the presence and the absence of antioxidants. Data represent the mean±SD of four separate experiments. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 9.
Mitochondrial Lipid peroxidation in Control and BPAN cells and the effect of antioxidants treatment. Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated (+) with a cocktail of 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate for 7 days. (A) Levels of Mitochondrial lipid peroxidation in untreated (-) and treated (+) control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) assayed by MitoPeDPP staining as described in Material and Methods. (B) MitoPeDPP staining quantification was performed by using the Fiji software. Cells were incubated with MitoTrackerTM Deep Red FM to demonstrate that MitoPeDPP signal colocalizes with a mitochondrial marker. Control fibroblasts were treated with 500 μM Luperox (LUP, Tert-butyl hydroperoxide) for 15 min as positive control of lipid peroxidation. Colocalization of both markers MitoPeDPP and MitoTracker was assessed by the DeltaVision software calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. Pearson correlation coefficient was >0,75 in BPAN fibroblasts and control+LUP. Scale bar= 20 μm. *p<0.05, **p<0.05 between control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05 between the presence and the absence of antioxidants. Data represent the mean±SD of four separate experiments. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 10.
Effect of antioxidants treatment on iron accumulation in BPAN cells. (A) Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate individually or in combination for 7 days. Then, cells were stained with Prussian Blue as described in Material and Methods and examined by bright-field microscopy. Scale bar= 20μm. (B) Quantification of Prussian Blue staining images were analyzed by the Image J software. (C) Iron content determined by ICP-MS. Total iron content of untreated (-) and treated (+) control and BPAN patients was determined by ICP-MS as described in Material and Methods. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05, ##p<0.005, ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidants cocktail. A. U.: arbitrary units.
Figure 10.
Effect of antioxidants treatment on iron accumulation in BPAN cells. (A) Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate individually or in combination for 7 days. Then, cells were stained with Prussian Blue as described in Material and Methods and examined by bright-field microscopy. Scale bar= 20μm. (B) Quantification of Prussian Blue staining images were analyzed by the Image J software. (C) Iron content determined by ICP-MS. Total iron content of untreated (-) and treated (+) control and BPAN patients was determined by ICP-MS as described in Material and Methods. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05, ##p<0.005, ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidants cocktail. A. U.: arbitrary units.
Figure 11.
Effect of antioxidant on lipofuscin accumulation addressed by Sudan Black staining and autofluorescence examination. Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate individually or in combination for 7 days. (A) Sudan Black staining. Cells were stained with Sudan Black as described in Material and Methods and examined by bright-field microscopy. Scale bar= 20μm. (B) Quantification of Sudan Black staining by image analysis using the Image J software. (C) Autofluorescence of lipofuscin granules was measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon A1R, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan) in Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) untreated (-) and treated (+) with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate combined for 7 days. (D) Quantification of autofluoescence by image analysis using the Fiji software. (E) Emission spectra of untreated (-) and treated (+) cells. Results are expressed as mean±SD of autofluorescence intensity. Results are expressed as mean±SD of autofluorescence intensity. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05, ##p<0.005, ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidants cocktail. A. U.: arbitrary units.
Figure 11.
Effect of antioxidant on lipofuscin accumulation addressed by Sudan Black staining and autofluorescence examination. Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate individually or in combination for 7 days. (A) Sudan Black staining. Cells were stained with Sudan Black as described in Material and Methods and examined by bright-field microscopy. Scale bar= 20μm. (B) Quantification of Sudan Black staining by image analysis using the Image J software. (C) Autofluorescence of lipofuscin granules was measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon A1R, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan) in Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) untreated (-) and treated (+) with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate combined for 7 days. (D) Quantification of autofluoescence by image analysis using the Fiji software. (E) Emission spectra of untreated (-) and treated (+) cells. Results are expressed as mean±SD of autofluorescence intensity. Results are expressed as mean±SD of autofluorescence intensity. **p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts; #p<0.05, ##p<0.005, ###p<0.0005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidants cocktail. A. U.: arbitrary units.
Figure 12.
Effect of antioxidants on cell ultrastructure. (A) Representative electron microscopy images of control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) treated with antioxidants (1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate). (B) Quantification of lipofuscin-like aggregates in Control and BPAN fibroblasts. Data represent the mean±SD of the examination of 50 cells per condition. *p<0.05 between control and BPAN fibroblasts; ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidant cocktail. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 12.
Effect of antioxidants on cell ultrastructure. (A) Representative electron microscopy images of control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) treated with antioxidants (1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate). (B) Quantification of lipofuscin-like aggregates in Control and BPAN fibroblasts. Data represent the mean±SD of the examination of 50 cells per condition. *p<0.05 between control and BPAN fibroblasts; ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidant cocktail. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 13.
Effect of antioxidants on WDR45 protein and transcripts expression levels. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Control (C1) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2. Untreated (-) and treated (+) with antioxidants (1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate) for 7 days. Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against WDR45. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. For control cells (C1 and C2), data are the mean±SD of the two control cell lines. (C) WDR45 gene expression under antioxidant treatment. WDR45 transcripts were quantified by RT-qPCR. Data represent the mean±SD of three separated experiments. *p<0.05, **<p0,005, ***p<0,0005, ****p<0,0001 between BPAN and controls fibroblasts. ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidant cocktail. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 13.
Effect of antioxidants on WDR45 protein and transcripts expression levels. (A) Immunoblotting analysis of cellular extracts from Control (C1) and BPAN patient cell lines P1 and P2. Untreated (-) and treated (+) with antioxidants (1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E, 5 μM pantothenate) for 7 days. Protein extracts (50 μg) were separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel and immunostained with antibodies against WDR45. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry of the Western blotting. For control cells (C1 and C2), data are the mean±SD of the two control cell lines. (C) WDR45 gene expression under antioxidant treatment. WDR45 transcripts were quantified by RT-qPCR. Data represent the mean±SD of three separated experiments. *p<0.05, **<p0,005, ***p<0,0005, ****p<0,0001 between BPAN and controls fibroblasts. ##p<0.005 between the presence and the absence of antioxidant cocktail. A.U., arbitrary units.
Figure 14.
Effect of antioxidants on autophagosome formation in control and BPAN cells. Tandem RFP-GFP-LC3B autophagy sensor was used to determine whether antioxidants cocktail (CK, 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate) were able to increase basal autophagosome formation and after autophagy inhibition by chloroquine (Cq). Control and BPAN cells untreated (-) and treated (+) with antioxidants for 7 days. Cells were then incubated with either vehicle or 90 μM chloroquine (Cq) for 16 hours and imaged. (A) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of untreated (-) and treated (+) control and BPAN cells. (B) Quantification of RFP and GFP-positive puncta. All images were taken with widefield fluorescence microscope using a 40X Plan Apo oil objective with standard filter sets for GFP and RFP. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, ** p<0.005 between BPAN cells and controls. #p<0.01 between the presence and the absence of Cq. APG=autophagosomes; AUT=autolysosomes.
Figure 14.
Effect of antioxidants on autophagosome formation in control and BPAN cells. Tandem RFP-GFP-LC3B autophagy sensor was used to determine whether antioxidants cocktail (CK, 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate) were able to increase basal autophagosome formation and after autophagy inhibition by chloroquine (Cq). Control and BPAN cells untreated (-) and treated (+) with antioxidants for 7 days. Cells were then incubated with either vehicle or 90 μM chloroquine (Cq) for 16 hours and imaged. (A) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of untreated (-) and treated (+) control and BPAN cells. (B) Quantification of RFP and GFP-positive puncta. All images were taken with widefield fluorescence microscope using a 40X Plan Apo oil objective with standard filter sets for GFP and RFP. Data represent the mean±SD of three separate experiments. *p<0.05, ** p<0.005 between BPAN cells and controls. #p<0.01 between the presence and the absence of Cq. APG=autophagosomes; AUT=autolysosomes.
Figure 15.
Effect of antioxidant on cell bioenergetics. Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated (+) with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate for 7 days. Basal and maximal respiration, and Spare Respiratory capacity were determined in control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts P1 (A) and P2 (B) by using the Seahorse analyzer as described in Material and Methods. Data represent the mean±SD of five separate experiments. *p<0.05, ** p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts.
Figure 15.
Effect of antioxidant on cell bioenergetics. Control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts (P1 and P2) were treated (+) with 1 μM α-lipoic acid, 10 μM vitamin E and 5 μM pantothenate for 7 days. Basal and maximal respiration, and Spare Respiratory capacity were determined in control (C1) and BPAN fibroblasts P1 (A) and P2 (B) by using the Seahorse analyzer as described in Material and Methods. Data represent the mean±SD of five separate experiments. *p<0.05, ** p<0.005, ***p<0.0005 between Control and BPAN fibroblasts.