Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

On Semiclassical Gravity and Horizon Area

Altmetrics

Downloads

111

Views

51

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

03 June 2023

Posted:

05 June 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The classical Einstein’s Field Equation has been derived previously by demanding that the Clausius relation dS = δQ/T holds. In this letter, we show that the semiclassical Einstein’s Field Equation can be recovered using the generalized entropy Sgen by using the non-equilibrium thermodynamics where the Clausius relation is replaced by the entropy balance relation dS = δQ/T +diS, where diS is some internal entropy. Moreover, since the quantum fields violate the classical focusing, we, therefore, have to use quantum focusing in this case. Using then Jacobson’s idea of thermodynamics of spacetime we recover the semiclassical equation of motion. We, therefore, in a sense also show the validity of the semiclassical approximation, a crucial approach for establishing a number of important ideas such as the Hawking effect.
Keywords: 
Subject: Physical Sciences  -   Theoretical Physics

1. Introduction

The connection between gravity and thermodynamics has long been explored. The first hints came from black hole thermodynamics when Hawking [1] showed that the area of a horizon(A) is a non-decreasing function of time.
d A d t ≥ 0
Later, Bekenstein [2] proposed the equality of horizon area and entropy as
S = γ A
where γ is a constant of proportionality. Hawking [3] fixed this constant of proportionality by deriving the black hole temperature as1
γ = 1 4 G ℏ
where G is the universal gravitational constant and ℏ is the reduced Planck’s constant. In 1995, Jacobson [4] derived Einstein’s field equation from this proportionality of horizon area and entropy and the fundamental thermodynamic result d Q = T d S under equilibrium conditions. Some works under the non-equilibrium conditions were also presented later [5,6,7]. Jacobson took Q as the heat flux across a causal horizon while temperature T given by Unruh temperature [8] as observed by a local Rindler observer inside the horizon as
T = ℏ k 2 π
where k is the local acceleration. He also assumed the proportionality of horizon area and entropy. Using these ingredients, he was able to derive Einstein’s field equation in the form
R a b − 1 2 R g a b + Λ g a b = 2 π ℏ η T a b
where the constant η = ( 4 G ℏ ) − 1 . The connection between gravity and thermodynamics was further explored by Padmanabhan [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] with some closely related follow up articles from his collaborators [20,21,22,23]. Recently, Verlinde [24] combined thermodynamic arguments and the holographic principle [25,26] and argued that gravity is an entropic force arising from the underlying microscopic theory to maximize its entropy. Very recently in 2016, Bousso et al. [27] conjectured the Quantum Focusing(QFC) which conjectures that the quantum expansion( Θ ) given by
Θ = lim A → 0 4 G ℏ A d S g e n d λ
where
S g e n = A 4 G ℏ + S o u t
A is the area of the horizon and S o u t is the entropy of matter outside the horizon, which cannot decrease
d Θ d λ ≤ 0
This definition of quantum expansion Θ allows us to generalize the classical focusing theorem to the semiclassical sector. The QFC implies a Quantum Bousso Bound which has already gathered a considerable amount of evidence [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. It also implies the quantum singularity theorems [35,36], the generalized second law of causal horizons and holographic screens [37] and a new property of nongravitational theories, the Quantum Null Energy Condition(QNEC) [27,38,39,40]. Arvin [41] presented a restricted quantum focusing which he argued is sufficient to derive all known essential implications of the quantum focusing and also proved it on brane-world semiclassical gravity theories. In this letter, using Jacobson’s approach and the QFC we show that the generalized entropy S g e n can be used to recover the semiclassical equation of motion. In the next section, we present our idea elaborately.

2. Recovering the Semiclassical Einstein’s Field Equation

Hawking [3] showed that black holes could evaporate, thus their horizon area can decrease via Hawking radiation. One of the key assumptions he made is the validity of semiclassical Einstein’s field equation in the semiclassical regime given by
G μ ν = − 8 π G c 4 〈 T μ ν 〉
where G μ ν is the Einstein tensor and 〈 T μ ν 〉 is the expectation value of the energy-momentum tensor. We show how to recover this critical equation, thus establishing the validity of the semiclassical approximation under the assumption that the fluctuations in T a b are negligible. Jacobson [4] derived Einstein’s Field Equation from the proportionality of entropy and horizon area together with the fundamental thermodynamic relation d Q = T d S . The strongest evidence of the equality between the horizon area and entropy comes from the black hole physics [2,3] and from the holographic principle [25,26] which states that the information about the volume of space is stored on its boundary. Now, consider the following substitution to get a semiclassical result
A → 4 G ℏ S g e n
The argument for doing the above substitution is as follows: In the classical case, the entropy change is given by d S = η δ A where δ A is the area variation of a pencil of generators of the causal horizon H but semiclassically δ A can be negative, so we should use d S = δ S g e n which is always positive. The intuitive argument is that classically we demand d θ / d λ ≤ 0 to impose a condition on spacetime curvature thereby leading to the classical equation of motion but semiclassically we should use the quantum focusing d Θ / d λ ≤ 0 to impose a condition on the spacetime curvature (since quantum fields violate classical focusing but even in this case quantum focusing holds) which should give the semiclassical equation of motion. In the semiclassical case, we work with the Quantum Expansion( Θ ) which allows for the natural generalization of the classical focusing theorem to the semiclassical regime. Next, we precisely define our local causal horizon: the local neighborhood of any arbitrary spacetime point p can be viewed as a flat spacetime using the Equivalence principle. Through p we consider a spacelike 2-surface element Σ . The past horizon of Σ is called the local causal horizon which can be thought of as a local Rindler horizon passing through point p. Considering a local Rindler horizon through p, we can take a local (boost) killing vector χ a , generating the horizon. To the past of Σ the heat flux can be defined as the boost energy across the horizon as
δ Q = ∫ H 〈 T a b 〉 χ a d Σ b
where we need to consider the angle brackets of the energy-momentum tensor for the semiclassical case. Here χ a is a local boost Killing field generating the horizon H . The relation between affine parameter λ and killing parameter v is generally given as λ = − e − v . But as we show here, in the semiclassical case, we should use instead λ = − e − 2 v so as to recover the semiclassical equation. This can be understood as the vanishing of quantum expansion Θ to zeroth order in λ must occur at twice the rate to correctly impose the condition on spacetime curvature. Therefore, we get χ a = − 2 k λ k a and δ Q takes the form
δ Q = − 2 k ∫ H λ 〈 T a b 〉 k a k b d λ d A
where k a is the tangent vector to the horizon generator for an affine parameter λ . We can also write
δ S g e n = η ∫ H Θ d λ d A
where η = ( 4 G ℏ ) − 1 . Since in the semiclassical case, the surface (cross-section of the local causal horizon) is contracting (and also possibly shearing) at p, we cannot apply the equilibrium thermodynamic relation d Q = T d S , instead, we use the Clausius definition of entropy in the non-equilibrium case as [5,7,42]
d S = d Q T + δ N
where the rate of change of entropy is written as
d S = d e S + d i S
d e S is the rate of change of entropy exchange with the surroundings while d i S is the entropy developed internally in the system as a result of being out of equilibrium. It is important to note that d i S is a non-negative quantity in accordance with the second law. δ N is the uncompensated heat which shows the amount of entropy associated with the heat which is intrinsic to the system when it undergoes an irreversible process. Let us expand Θ around p
Θ = Θ p + λ d Θ d λ | p + O ( λ 2 )
In the semiclassical regime, we have [27]
d Θ d λ = − 1 2 θ 2 − ζ 2 − R a b k a k b + d d λ 4 G ℏ A S o u t ′
Therefore Eq.(13) becomes
δ S g e n = η ∫ H Θ p − λ θ 2 2 + ζ 2 + R a b k a k b − d d λ 4 G ℏ A S o u t ′ | p d λ d A
Since at zero order in λ , Θ p = 0 , we have
θ p = − 4 G ℏ A S o u t ′ | p
We therefore get
δ S g e n = η ∫ H − 2 λ θ 2 2 + ζ 2 + R a b k a k b d λ d A
From this, we find
d i S = − 2 η ∫ H λ θ 2 2 + ζ 2 d λ d A
and
d e S = − 2 η ∫ H λ R a b k a k b d λ d A
Thus, the internal entropy production rate d i S , in this case, is twice that of the classical one and has contributions from both scalar and tensorial degrees of freedom. To see why d e S and d i S take these expressions can be understood by expressing Eq.(21) in terms of the Killing parameter v as
d i S = 4 η ∫ H d v d A θ 2 2 + ζ 2 ≥ 0
as required by the second law (since the affine parameter λ and Killing parameter v on the horizon are related by λ = − e − 2 v ). Eq.(22) then follows from Eq.(18). Thus, given the entropy change d S = δ S g e n , where d S = d i S + d e S , then Eq.(22) and Eq.(21) are unique choices for d e S and d i S respectively. Therefore, at first order in λ , equating d e S = d Q / T we obtain
〈 T a b 〉 k a k b = ℏ η 2 π R a b k a k b
On the other hand, we have d i S = δ N as the internal entropy associated with some irreversible dissipation occurring at the Rindler wedge. Eq.(24) implies
2 π ℏ η 〈 T a b 〉 = R a b + f g a b
for some function f. Local conservation implies 〈 T a b 〉 is divergenceless and we therefore recover semiclassical equation of motion
R a b − 1 2 R g a b + Λ g a b = 2 π ℏ η 〈 T a b 〉
where Λ is a constant identified as the cosmological constant.

3. Conclusion

In this letter, we showed that the semiclassical Einstein’s field equation can be recovered in the semiclassical case using the generalized entropy S g e n . Since S g e n is a cutoff independent quantity, it reveals information about the full quantum gravity theory and shows that the semiclassical approximation can be trusted as long as the fluctuations in T a b are negligible.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hawking, S.W. Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes. Physical Review Letters 1971, 26, 1344. [CrossRef]
  2. Bekenstein, J.D. Black Holes and Entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2333–2346. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333. [CrossRef]
  3. Hawking, S.W. Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 1975, 43, 199–220. doi:10.1007/BF02345020. [CrossRef]
  4. Jacobson. Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state. Physical review letters 1995, 75 7, 1260–1263. [CrossRef]
  5. Eling, C.; Guedens, R.; Jacobson, T. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime. Physical Review Letters 2006, 96, 121301. [CrossRef]
  6. Eling, C. Hydrodynamics of spacetime and vacuum viscosity. Journal of High Energy Physics 2008, 2008, 048. [CrossRef]
  7. Chirco, G.; Liberati, S. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime: The role of gravitational dissipation. Physical Review D 2010, 81, 024016. [CrossRef]
  8. Unruh, W.G. Notes on black-hole evaporation. Physical Review D 1976, 14, 870. [CrossRef]
  9. Padmanabhan, T. IS GRAVITY AN INTRINSICALLY QUANTUM PHENOMENON? DYNAMICS OF GRAVITY FROM THE ENTROPY OF SPACE–TIME AND THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE. Modern Physics Letters A 2002, 17, 1147–1158. [CrossRef]
  10. Padmanabhan, T. Gravity from spacetime thermodynamics. Astrophysics and space science 2003, 285, 407–417. [CrossRef]
  11. Padmanabhan, T. Entropy of static spacetimes and microscopic density of states. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2004, 21, 4485. [CrossRef]
  12. Padmanabhan, T. Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons. Physics Reports 2005, 406, 49–125. [CrossRef]
  13. Padmanabhan, T. Holographic gravity and the surface term in the Einstein-Hilbert action. Brazilian Journal of Physics 2005, 35, 362–372. [CrossRef]
  14. Padmanabhan, T. A new perspective on gravity and dynamics of space–time. International Journal of Modern Physics D 2005, 14, 2263–2269. [CrossRef]
  15. Padmanabhan, T. Gravity: A new holographic perspective. International Journal of Modern Physics D 2006, 15, 1659–1675. [CrossRef]
  16. Padmanabhan, T. Gravity as an emergent phenomenon. International Journal of Modern Physics D 2008, 17, 591–596. [CrossRef]
  17. Padmanabhan, T. Entropy density of spacetime and thermodynamic interpretation of field equations of gravity in any diffeomorphism invariant theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.1254 2009.
  18. Padmanabhan, T. Lessons from classical gravity about the quantum structure of spacetime. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2011, Vol. 306, p. 012001. [CrossRef]
  19. Padmanabhan, T. Gravity and is thermodynamics. Current Science 2015, pp. 2236–2242. [CrossRef]
  20. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Padmanabhan, T. Holography of gravitational action functionals. Physical Review D 2006, 74, 124023. [CrossRef]
  21. Kothawala, D.; Sarkar, S.; Padmanabhan, T. Einstein’s equations as a thermodynamic identity: The cases of stationary axisymmetric horizons and evolving spherically symmetric horizons. Physics Letters B 2007, 652, 338–342. [CrossRef]
  22. Kothawala, D.; Padmanabhan, T. Thermodynamic structure of Lanczos-Lovelock field equations from near-horizon symmetries. Physical Review D 2009, 79, 104020. [CrossRef]
  23. Kolekar, S.; Padmanabhan, T. Holography in action. Physical Review D 2010, 82, 024036. [CrossRef]
  24. Verlinde, E. On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics 2011, 2011, 1–27. [CrossRef]
  25. Susskind, L. The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics 1995, 36, 6377–6396. [CrossRef]
  26. Hooft, G. Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. arXiv preprint gr-qc/9310026 1993.
  27. Bousso, R.; Fisher, Z.; Leichenauer, S.; Wall, A.C. Quantum focusing conjecture. Physical Review D 2016, 93, 064044. [CrossRef]
  28. Bousso, R. A covariant entropy conjecture. Journal of High Energy Physics 1999, 1999, 004. [CrossRef]
  29. Bousso, R. The holographic principle. Reviews of Modern Physics 2002, 74, 825. [CrossRef]
  30. Bousso, R.; Flanagan, E.E.; Marolf, D. Simple sufficient conditions for the generalized covariant entropy bound. Physical Review D 2003, 68, 064001. [CrossRef]
  31. Bousso, R.; Casini, H.; Fisher, Z.; Maldacena, J. Proof of a quantum Bousso bound. Physical Review D 2014, 90, 044002. [CrossRef]
  32. Bousso, R.; Casini, H.; Fisher, Z.; Maldacena, J. Entropy on a null surface for interacting quantum field theories and the Bousso bound. Physical Review D 2015, 91, 084030. [CrossRef]
  33. Flanagan, E.E.; Marolf, D.; Wald, R.M. Proof of classical versions of the Bousso entropy bound and of the generalized second law. Physical Review D 2000, 62, 084035. [CrossRef]
  34. Strominger, A.; Thompson, D. Quantum bousso bound. Physical Review D 2004, 70, 044007. [CrossRef]
  35. Wall, A.C. The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2013, 30, 165003. [CrossRef]
  36. Bousso, R.; Shahbazi-Moghaddam, A. Quantum Singularities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07001 2022.
  37. Bousso, R.; Engelhardt, N. Generalized second law for cosmology. Physical Review D 2016, 93, 024025. [CrossRef]
  38. Bousso, R.; Fisher, Z.; Koeller, J.; Leichenauer, S.; Wall, A.C. Proof of the quantum null energy condition. Physical Review D 2016, 93, 024017. [CrossRef]
  39. Balakrishnan, S.; Faulkner, T.; Khandker, Z.U.; Wang, H. A general proof of the quantum null energy condition. Journal of High Energy Physics 2019, 2019, 1–86. [CrossRef]
  40. Ceyhan, F.; Faulkner, T. Recovering the QNEC from the ANEC. Communications in Mathematical Physics 2020, 377, 999–1045. [CrossRef]
  41. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, A. Restricted Quantum Focusing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03881 2022.
  42. Dey, R.; Liberati, S.; Pranzetti, D. Spacetime thermodynamics in the presence of torsion. Physical Review D 2017, 96, 124032. [CrossRef]
1
In this paper we set k B = c = 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated