3.1. Estimation of wear and durability of dental burs
The experimental research had in mind, first of all, the determination of the mass, mf of the specimen dental bur subjected to the research, respectively of the mass of the processed dental material, mm before testing.
Table 2 and
Table 3 show the mass and dimensions of the specimen dental bur (
Table 2), respectively the mass and dimensions of the sample dental material subjected to testing (
Table 3), before testing.
The results of the experiments show the dependence on time and the rotation speed of the dental bur, the geometric characteristics of its active part, and the mass of material lost through wear,
mw [
10]. The list of these parameters was given in
Table 1.
The method used to obtain the results is based on polynomial interpolation using the least squares technique. Thus, the general mathematical relationship of interpolation polynomials, written in canonical form, is as follows:
which developed up to the third degree, becomes:
as being sufficient to describe the wear phenomenon of the active part of the dental burs, and
q the interpolated parameter (here, the mass lost by the wear of the active part of the dental bur,
mw).
Note: As interpolated parameters can be used any other characteristic/functional parameter of the active part of the researched dental bur, for example, seating angle, clearance angle, sharpening angle, the area, or radius of the tip circle, etc.
The synthesis of the results of the least squares interpolation for the measured parameter (see
Table 1) during the experimental tests is given in
Table 4 and they contain the coefficients of the polynomials,
c00…
c03 with two variables (time, t, and the rotation speed of the dental bur, ω, implicitly and of its active part), as well as the average of the squared errors, ε, which ranks the approximation performances.
Note: Polynomial coefficients were calculated with Mathcad using the least squares method.
It can be seen that the polynomial coefficients are double indexed, the first index (example: 1 from c10) represents the power exponent of the temporal variable (time, t). the second index (example: 0 of c10) represents the rotation speed, ω.
To calculate the error, ε, the relation was used:
where:
yw,
w = 1,…,
N are the experimental data for the dependent variable, for example,
mw;
xw =
tw,
ωw is the data string of the independent variable, for example,
t and ω; N is the number of experimental data;
is the mean value of the experimental data for the string of the dependent variable.
For cutting, chipping, etc. instruments/tools, in general, and dental burs in particular, the assessment of wear and lifetime (durability) is done in relation to one or more geometric or physical parameters (such as the lamellas angles of the active part of the dental burs, the area or radius of the peak circle), as described in the literature of specialty [
11,
12].
Thus, the main indicator of dental bur wear is the mass removed (lost) through wear,
mw. For the experiments carried out, the variation of this parameter,
mw, was recorded for the five operating times, established in advance (1, 2, 3, 3.5, and 4 hours of operation) and for the four values of the speed rotation of the dental bur (7000, 12000, 20000, and 35000 rpm). The results were stored in the Excel numerical database and a synthetic representation of them can be seen in
Figure 4.
Similar results can be obtained and for other characteristic/functional parameters of the active part of the researched dental bur (the lamellas angles: of seating, clearance, sharpening; the area or the radius of the peak circle, etc.).
Figure 4.
Evolution of the mass, mw of the active part of dental burs removed by wear in the work process, as a function of time, t and of rotation speed, n.
Figure 4.
Evolution of the mass, mw of the active part of dental burs removed by wear in the work process, as a function of time, t and of rotation speed, n.
Estimation of the lifetime (durability) of the active part of the tested dental bur, cylindrical-conical type (see
Figure 1), manufactured from a metal mixture in which tungsten predominates (58.14%), in relation to the mass lost through wear of the active part of the dental bur,
mw is shown in
Table 5. To estimate the lifetime of the dental bur, in relation to
mw at the four revolutions used (see
Table 5) in the experimental tests, were take account considered the polynomial interpolation functions of the first, second, and third degree, as specified above.
Thus, to estimate the durability or lifetime of the active part of a dental bur, by calculation, the working time calculation relationship was used [
13]:
established based on the conventional determination of a fraction,
μ of the total mass of the active part of the dental bur, which is lost during the working process, ω the angular velocity of the researched burs, and
d model parameter, which is determined by the method of least squares applied to a non-linear function dependent on
mw and the angular space (friction length) traveled by the dental bur.
To establish the critical fraction,
μ of material of the active part of the dental bur, which can be lost by the milling process, one can start from about 65 % of the mass of the approximate circular crown of the active part of the dental bur, determined experimentally through the total wear of the lamellas of the active part of the dental bur, followed of weighing and by the difference to the weight of the specimen dental bur (
Figure 5) the value of 0.522 g was obtained.
Thus, for the dental bur tested in the laboratory, the results are those given in
Table 6, from the column of mass lost through wear,
mw.
Using the experimental data whose evolution can be seen in
Figure 6, the values obtained are for the time variation of the mass of the dental bur,
mw, and of the milled dental material,
mm. Thus, the initial mass of the specimen dental bur was
mf = 4.701 g, and the mass of the processed dental material,
mm = 6.180 g, the final values of the mass of the dental bur,
mw varied between 4.700 g and 4.360 g and of the processed dental material varied between 6.102 g and 4.160 g.
Figure 6 shows the average variations in time of the masses of the two bodies in interaction/contact with relative movement (in the work process): the dental bur and the dental material, subject to milling. The processes that take place by friction on the contact surfaces and in the surface layers, respectively in the micro volumes of asperities in contact are of a different nature and depend on a series of mechanical, physical, chemical, and geometric factors.
It is observed that both bodies (dental bur and dental material), which interact (are in contact with relative movement), lose mass. The loss of mass over time has a variation according to an exponential curve (after one hour of operation), even if, in the prescribed working interval, due to the values of the parameters, their curvature is not sufficiently accentuated.
For the mass lost by the dental bur and the mass lost by the milled dental material, the efficiency ratio of the dental bur was additionally considered, e(t), i.e., the ratio between the dental material lost (removed, in grams) to the material lost (removed, in grams) by the dental bur.
The graph of the variation of the mass of material lost by the dental bur and of the milled dental material as a function of time, measured during the tests, can be seen in
Figure 7, and the time variation of the efficiency ratio
e(
t) between the mass loss of the dental material milled and the mass loss of the dental bur material (on the active area) is represented in
Figure 8.
Based on the graphical representations in
Figure 7 and
Figure 8 it can be seen that the material and configuration of the dental bur allow it to be efficient, meaning that a small amount of dental bur material lost removes more material from the milled dental material. However, this effect is visible for a time much longer than four hours of operation, after which the inefficiency of the dental burs was observed (see
Figure 5).
3.2. Reliability of dental burs. The reliability-durability correlation
Considering the experimental results, and, in addition, those obtained from practice from users of dental burs, who use/consume a lot of dental burs, it turned out that:
- -
the active part of dental burs operates with a very low probability of failure until a time, tmin, after which it increases rapidly until a time, tmax, when practically no bur is usable anymore, in general;
- -
the time interval for removing from use the active part of a dental bur, tmax − tmin, is due to the small differences between the manufacturing characteristics of the same type of active part of dental burs (slightly different masses, angles, etc.).
These differences ultimately have implications for lifespan, as seen in the durability calculation. The interval of increasing failure probability [
tmin,
tmax], is the larger the differences between the active parts of the same type, even from the same set of products, are larger. With these two observations and using the definitions of the "cap" and "bump" type functions, a reliability function
R(
t) (probability of correct operation at a time
t ≤
tmax) is proposed for the operation of dental burs, having the expression [
14]:
where:
tmax is the time after which it is experimentally established that the active parts of the dental burs of the same brand and the same type have failed, and
z is a parametric exponent, which can be chosen, so that the time at which the exponential growth begins of the failure probability,
tmin, to be as best estimated as possible. Corresponding to the reliability function,
R(
t), the failure function,
F(
t), and the frequency function,
f(
t), are also defined, as useful for interpreting the results.
In this case, a satisfactory estimate is obtained for
z = 0.75, the value for which it is established as realistically as possible the minimum time (
tmin = 10,265 hours), from which the failure begins (the exponential increase of the failure probability), of the active part of the dental bur. Under these conditions, for the tested dental burs, whose characteristics are given in
Table 2, at their speed of 7000 rpm (for example), the times
tmin = 10,265 hours, respectively
tmax = 12,613 hours were estimated according to
Table 6, from experimental determinations.
In
Figure 9 and
Figure 10, the failure function graph,
F(
t) (distribution or probability of failure and
F(
t) = 1 −
R(
t),
t ≥ 0) and frequency,
f(
t) (density of failure probability,
f(
t) =
F′(
t) =
dF(
t)/
dt = −
dR(
t)/
dt, (
t ≥ 0), corresponding to the reliability function,
R(
t), from the relation (5).
It is observed that the reliability function, R(t) is monotonically decreasing, with values in the interval [0, 1] and when time tends to infinity (t → ∞), R(t) cancels (even for finite values, i.e. tmax, in our case, R(0)) = 1 and when t → ∞), R(t) = 0). The failure function, F(t) is increasing, with values in the interval [0, 1], F(0) = 0, and when t → ∞), F(t) = 1, and the frequency function, f(t) check the relationship .
Figure 11 shows the function,
h(t) (which measures the instantaneous risk of failure and
h(
t) =
f(
t)/
R(
t),
R(
t) ≠ 0) and it is observed that for 11 hours the risk failure rate is below 10%. in the 12th hour of operation, the risk of failure (which in the case of the active part of the dental bur means putting it out of action) increases approximately exponentially, that is, after 11 hours of operation, which means that, is normal to replace the dental bur.
In addition, the function h(t) has an evolution that we can divide into four areas:
- -
the first zone, when t Є (0, 4) hours, there is no risk of failure, and h(t) has a linear variation, close to zero;
- -
the second zone, when t Є (4, 8) hours, there are minimal (very low) chances of failure, although h(t) has a linear variation with a very small slope;
- -
the third zone, when t Є (8, 10) hours, h(t) begins to increase, has a curvilinear variation, so the phenomenon of wear becomes visible, and the risk of failure is increasing;
- -
the fourth zone, when t Є (10, 12) hours, h(t), increases suddenly, following an exponential curve and the risk of failure is very high.
So, the researched dental burs can work without major risk of failure for up to 10 hours, which is very close to those calculated analytically based on the experimental results, that is, it confirms the veracity of the experimental results and the correlation between the analytical calculation and experimental test results.