3.1. Decay resistance and leaching test
The results of the decay resistance test are shown in
Figure 1, which illustrates the percentage of mass loss after 16 weeks of exposure to both types of rot. In the case of the untreated samples, all of them exhibited mass loss values exceeding the minimum threshold specified by the standard (20%), thereby validating the decay test.
The treatment applied to the wood resulted in reduced mass loss, indicating that the treatment could effectively protect the wood from fungal degradation. Based on the criteria outlined in Standard EN 350-1(1994), the ratio of mass loss for the treated wood samples was below 0.15, classifying them as “very durable” wood.
By analyzing the differential weight loss of the control samples based on the species they were exposed to, it is evident that Coniophora puteana (brown or cubic rot, which primarily degrades cellulose) has exhibited the highest level of aggressiveness followed by Pleurotus ostreatus (white rot, which primarily degrades lignin).
Based on the information provided, it can be concluded that the chemical modification occurred in different layers of the cell wall, with the variety of rot being determined by the polymer that the fungi attacks. This can be attributed to the interaction between the impregnant and the cell wall components during the hydrolysis and condensation reactions of the sol-gel process, resulting in the formation of a non-occlusive coating on the wood.
This conclusion is supported by the following observations:
(i) During the impregnation process, the water-repellent substances (siliconate and nanoparticles) are carried by the alcohol and water and deposited on the wood surface, where polymerization occurs through the sol-gel process.
(ii) The alcohol evaporates during the formation of the xerogel film, which occurs during curing and aging.
(iii) The formation of the coating is not uniform and occurs in certain areas surrounding non-coated regions. In other words, the coating is formed around clusters of cells, leaving an untreated core.
This explanation accounts for the effective protection of the wood, even when low levels of impregnant are used.
Silanes and nanoparticles have been found to possess a moderate ability to penetrate the wood cell wall. This property has been demonstrated in various studies. For instance, when Pine wood was impregnated with silver nanoparticles, it exhibited lower weight loss caused by the fungus
T. versicolor compared to untreated wood. Similarly, silver nanoparticles dispersed in water were effective in providing strong protection against molds such as
A. niger, P. citrinum, and T. viride on the surface of poplar wood. Furthermore, wood treated with a nano silver-copper alloy displayed enhanced resistance against mold compared to untreated wood samples [
22,
23,
24,
25].
These findings suggest that the incorporation of silanes and nanoparticles into wood can effectively inhibit the growth of fungi and molds, thereby reducing the extent of decay and surface contamination. The ability of these materials to penetrate the wood cell wall allows them to provide a protective barrier and enhance the overall durability of the wood.
Overall, the studies mentioned support the idea that the use of silanes and nanoparticles in wood treatment can significantly improve its resistance to fungal decay and mold growth, thereby enhancing its longevity and durability.
Indeed, in this study, the nanoparticles used in combination with siliconate could be acting as an anchorage, enhancing the wood's chemical modification. The presence of nanoparticles not only contributes to the overall protective effect but also provides additional benefits through their intrinsic properties.
Firstly, the nanoparticles can facilitate the chemical modification of the wood cell wall by serving as anchor points for the siliconate molecules. This improves the adhesion and penetration of the siliconate into the wood structure, resulting in a more effective and durable modification of the cell wall components.
Secondly, the nanoparticles themselves may possess biocidal properties, which further contribute to the protection of the wood. The nanoparticles can inhibit the growth of microorganisms, such as fungi and molds, thus preventing decay and surface contamination. This dual mechanism of action, involving both the chemical modification of the wood and the biocidal effect of the nanoparticles, confirms the performance and effectiveness of the treatment.
By combining the benefits of chemical modification and the biocidal properties of nanoparticles, the treated wood exhibits enhanced resistance against degradation and microbial attack. This approach provides a comprehensive and multifaceted protection strategy for wood preservation, ultimately improving its durability and extending its lifetime.
The results of the leaching test are crucial in assessing the potential environmental impact and residual toxicity risks associated with the impregnant. The absence of migration or leaching of the impregnant or its active components into the water throughout the test duration is a positive finding.
This indicates that the impregnant used in the study did not release any significant amounts of toxic substances into the surrounding environment. The lack of leaching suggests that the impregnant remains bound within the wood matrix and does not pose a risk of contaminating water sources or causing adverse effects on aquatic organisms.
This information is important for evaluating the environmental safety and sustainability of the impregnation treatment. It provides assurance that the treatment is not introducing harmful substances into the ecosystem and can be considered as an environmentally friendly option for wood protection.
It is worth noting that the absence of leaching observed in this specific study does not guarantee the same outcome for different formulations or conditions. Further research and testing may be necessary to assess the leaching potential of impregnants under various scenarios and to ensure their long-term environmental safety.