Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Causal Effect of Chondroitin, Glucosamine, Vitamin, and Mineral Intake on Kidney Function: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Altmetrics

Downloads

104

Views

44

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.pdf (199.17KB )

Submitted:

27 June 2023

Posted:

27 June 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The causal effects of chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamin/mineral supplement intake on kidney function remain unknown, despite being commonly used. We conducted a two-sample summary-level Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to test for causal associations between regular dietary supplement intake and kidney function. Genetic instruments for chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamin/mineral supplement intake were obtained from genome-wide association study of European ancestry. Summary statistics for the log-transformed estimated glomerular filtration rate (log-eGFR) were provided by the CKDGen consortium. The multiplicative random-effects inverse variance-weighted method showed that genetically predicted chondroitin and glucosamine intake was causally associated with a lower eGFR (chondroitin, eGFR change beta = -0.113 %, standard error (SE) = 0.03 %, P-value = 2E-04; glucosamine, eGFR change beta = -0.240 %, SE = 0.035 %, P-value = 6E-12). However, a genetically predicted vitamin/mineral supplement intake was associated with a higher eGFR (eGFR change beta = 1.426 %, SE = 0.136 %, P-value = 1E-25). Validation analyses and pleiotropy-robust MR results for chondroitin and vitamin/mineral supplement intake supported the main results. Our MR study suggests a potential causal effect of chondroitin and glucosamine intake on kidney function. Therefore, clinicians should carefully monitor their long-term effects.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Clinical Medicine

Introduction

The kidney is an organ that metabolizes various drugs through enzyme systems and excrete the metabolites from the body via glomerular filtration and tubular secretion [1]. The formation of potential nephrotoxic metabolites due to drug ingestion and their concentration in the kidney medulla and interstitium may lead to drug-induced nephrotoxicity [2]. As general population is largely exposed to various over-the-counter drugs, [3,4]. it is important to identify the effects of these drugs on kidney function.
Chondroitin and glucosamine are major structural components of cartilage used as symptomatic slow-acting drugs for both osteoarthritis (OA) and joint discomfort [5]. These glycosaminoglycan precursors have been widely used as over-the-counter drugs or dietary supplements because of their tolerability and safety [6,7,8]. Chondroitin and glucosamine are associated with a reduction in joint pain, improvement of joint function, and reduction of joint space narrowing in patients with OA [6,7,9,10]. Despite a protective effect against various pathological conditions, including inflammation, [11,12]. cardiovascular disease, [13]. and diabetes, [14]. there have been some reports of non-specific kidney injury and toxicity associated with these chondroprotective drugs [15,16,17]. Nevertheless, the causal association between chondroitin or glucosamine intake and kidney function has not been established yet.
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a statistical method to evaluate the causal association between exposure and outcome traits using genetic instruments that are closely linked to exposure [18]. As MR analysis uses a genetic instrument fixed at conception, the causal association is less susceptible to confounding and reverse causality. Thus, MR has been widely used to demonstrate causal linkages between complex phenotypes, including kidney function traits, in several epidemiological studies recently. [19,20,21].
In the present study, we performed an MR analysis to identify the causal effects of various dietary supplements, including chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamins, on kidney function. We hypothesized that chondroitin and glucosamine intake may be associated with decreased kidney function.

Materials and Methods

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Seoul National University Hospital (IRB number: E-2306-031-1437). The summary statistics of the kidney function traits are from the public domain (http://ckdgen.imbi.uni-freiburg.de/) of CKDGen consortium. The requirement for informed consent was waived because the study analyzed anonymous public data and summary statistics.

Study setting

This was a two-sample summary-level MR study that analyzed the causal effects of dietary supplement intake on kidney function (Figure 1). Genetic instruments for each dietary supplement, including chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamin supplements, were obtained from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using UK Biobank (UKB) data, which is a large prospective cohort of over 500,000 enrolled participants. Summary statistics for kidney function were provided by the CKDGen Consortium, which is currently the largest GWAS meta-analysis database of kidney function traits.

Data sources for chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamin supplement intake

Three sets of genetic instruments were introduced for the intake of chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamin and/or mineral supplements (e.g., vitamin C, multivitamin, fish oil, calcium supplement), respectively, from the previous GWAS (Supplemental Table 1) [22]. The GWAS result was released by the Neale Lab (http://www.nealelab.is/uk-biobank) based on 361,194 white British participants from the UKB and was used to establish genetic instruments that were used in the previous MR analysis [22]. The dietary supplement intake data were collected using detailed electronic questionnaires by UKB. Participants were presented with a list of supplements, including chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamin/mineral supplements, and asked the question, “Do you usually take any of the following?”. A binary classification for regular supplement intake was established based on the questionnaire data (1 = yes, 0 = no). Each phenotype had a sample size of 361,141 participants taking chondroitin, 360,016 participants taking glucosamine, and 54,162 participants taking vitamin and/or mineral supplements. The selected SNPs in each GWAS reached the genome-wide significance threshold of P < 5 x 10-8 (5 x 10-6 for vitamin supplements) and a window of 10,000 kb (r2 < 0.001) to confirm their independence. The instrumental strengths were assessed with F-statistics demonstrated of ≥ 10, [22]. indicating a relatively low risk of weak instrumental bias in MR analysis. To identify potential pleiotropic confounders with an association (P < 5 x 10-8), we screened each instrument SNP in PhenoScanner (http://www.phenoscanner.medschl.cam.ac.uk/) [23]. The Average weekly beer plus cider intake, mineral and other dietary supplements (fish oil), and educational status were potential confounders (Supplemental Table 2).

Data sources for kidney function traits

Summary statistics for kidney function traits were obtained from the CKDGen, currently the largest GWAS meta-analysis database for various kidney function traits of European ancestry [24]. The main MR analysis for kidney function was conducted using the CKDGen meta-analysis for log-transformed creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (log-eGFRcr) from 2019 (N = 765,348) [24]. In the clinical field, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is used as a standard parameter for evaluating kidney function as recommended by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO), a global organization for establishing clinical practice guidelines in kidney disease [25]. As data sources for diet supplementary drugs were provided by UKB, we used a CKDGen-based dataset for the main analysis to avoid the potential weak instrumental bias raised by participants overlap [26]. For validation, CKDGen and UKB meta-analyses for log-eGFRcr (N = 1,201,930) were used because they were the largest meta-analyses of eGFR despite the possibility of partial overlap of the population among exposure and outcome datasets [27].

MR assumptions

A valid causal inference may be established through the assessment of three key MR assumptions regarding instrumental variables [18]. First, the relevance assumption indicates that the instrumental variable is strongly associated with exposure. This was established by using genetic instruments from the previous GWAS that met genome-wide significance at a threshold of P < 5 × 10-8. (except for vitamin supplements intake for P < 5 × 10-6) and had F-statistics ≥ 10. Second, the independence assumption is that the instrumental variable is not associated with any confounder that affects the outcome. Third, the exclusion restriction assumption is that the IV is associated with the outcome only through exposure. For the second and third assumptions, we performed pleiotropy-robust MR analyses to support the robustness of the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) estimates, even when some of the genetic variants were invalid [28,29]. For example, the weighted median method can provide valid estimates when half of the weight contributed by genetic variants has pleiotropic effects. MR-Egger provides valid estimates, even when all genetic variants have a pleiotropic effect. In addition, we ascertained that none of the instrumental variables violated the direction of causal effects towards exposure as they did not exhibit a direct effect (P < 5 x 10-8) on the outcome.

Two-sample summary-level MR analysis

The multiplicative random-effects IVW method was performed as the main MR analysis, as recommended in the guidelines for MR analysis [18]. The multiplicative random-effects IVW provides valid causal estimates under the assumption of balanced pleiotropy. Pleiotropy-robust MR methods, including MR-Egger [28]. and weighed-median, [29]. have been implemented to address valid causal estimates, even under conditions of unbalanced pleiotropy. Single-SNP and leave-one-out analyses were performed to identify the presence of a disproportionate effect of one SNP. Cochran’s Q test was used to identify heterogeneity. In addition, as there were some potential confounders found by PhenoScanner, we performed a sensitivity analysis by consecutively excluding groups of SNPs that were involved in the same phenotype to establish the robustness of our findings.
The summary-level MR analysis was performed by the “TwoSampleMR” package. Regarding the issue of multiple comparisons, as the finding that was consistent throughout the study outcome and sensitivity analysis was reported to be significant, we used the conventional two-sided P < 0.05 as the threshold level of significance.

Results

Characteristics of the data sources

Summary statistics of the exposure and outcome data were obtained from the UKB and CKDGen. UKB is a population-based prospective cohort study that included over 500,000 Europeans aged between 40 and 69 years between 2009 and 2010 [30]. The average age was 56.5 ± 8.1 and 45.6 % were male. The prevalence of CKD was 7.4 % and the mean serum creatinine was 0.82 ± 0.21 mg/dL. The median age of CKDGen GWAS meta-analysis participants was 54 years, and 50 % were female. The median of the mean eGFR was 89 (interquartile range, 81–94) mL/min/1.73 m2 [24].

MR analysis of dietary supplement intake on kidney function

In the summary-level MR analysis, the IVW results showed a significant association between genetically predicted regular chondroitin, vitamin/mineral supplements, and glucosamine intake and kidney function (Table 1, Figure 2). In the main analysis, genetically predicted chondroitin and glucosamine intake were significantly associated with lower eGFR. In contrast, genetically predicted vitamin/mineral supplement intake was significantly associated with a higher eGFR. The validation analyses of chondroitin and vitamin/mineral supplement intake showed results concordant with those of the main analyses. In other words, regular chondroitin intake was associated with a lower eGFR, whereas regular vitamin/mineral intake and kidney function were associated with a higher eGFR in different outcome datasets. Regarding glucosamine intake, however, the results of the main analyses were not replicated when analyzed using the log-eGFRcr meta-analysis summary statistics provided by the CKDGen and UKB.
The pleiotropy-robust MR analyses (Supplemental Table 3), using genetically predicted chondroitin and vitamin/mineral supplement intake as exposures, supported the main findings, whereas the results from glucosamine intake did not align with the main MR results. The leave-one-out analysis demonstrated no notable outlier effects in the MR analyses conducted with the three exposures.

Sensitivity analysis for chondroitin intake

Regarding the MR results for chondroitin intake and kidney function, an MR-Egger intercept P < 0.05 was observed, indicating potential pleiotropy. Therefore, we conducted additional sensitivity analyses using PhenoScanner to identify potential confounders (Supplemental Table 4). First, we examined the association between genetically predicted chondroitin intake and kidney function after excluding the SNPs associated with the phenotype “beer plus cider intake,” and identified that the significant inverse association between chondroitin intake and kidney function was maintained. Furthermore, we assessed the causal relationship between chondroitin intake and kidney function after excluding the SNPs associated with “high educational status” and found that the results were similar to the main finding. Specifically, although the MR estimates from sensitivity analysis using the main dataset showed no significant association between chondroitin intake and eGFR, the results from the validation dataset showed a significant association between genetically predicted chondroitin intake and lower eGFR.

Discussion

In this MR study, we identified causal linkages between the intake of over-the-counter drugs, including chondroitin, glucosamine, and vitamin/mineral supplements, and kidney function. Chondroitin was significantly associated with a lower eGFR, whereas vitamin/mineral supplement intake was associated with a higher eGFR. Although glucosamine intake was causally associated with a lower eGFR in the main analysis, the results were not replicated in the validation datasets. Our study suggests that chondroitin intake may decrease kidney function, whereas vitamin and mineral supplement intake may preserve kidney function.
Chondroitin and glucosamine sulfate are widely used over-the-counter supplementary drugs for relieving joint pain and delaying the progression of OA because of their safety profile and tolerability [6,7,8,31,32]. These chondroprotective drugs are commonly used as dietary supplements, even among patients who are at high risk of kidney function decline, including kidney donors [33]. Chondroitin and glucosamine are absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, metabolized mostly in the liver, and eliminated via the kidneys. When intravenously injected, more than 30 % of the glucosamine sulfate is excreted in urine [34]. However, there is only limited data regarding the metabolism, excretion, and toxicity of chondroitin and glucosamine. Furthermore, studies examining the potential effects of these drugs on the kidneys are lacking.
Our study has several strengths. First, we conducted an MR analysis that provided causal estimates between supplementary drug intake and kidney function. These results are less prone to confounding and are unaffected by reverse causation, both of which are limitations of observational studies. Second, this study provided valuable data on the adverse causal effects of regular chondroitin intake on kidney function. Our findings have clinical implications and suggest that patients taking chondroprotective drugs should be monitored for changes in kidney function. Additionally, patients who are at high risk of kidney function impairment should be better informed of potential kidney function impairment before the ingestion of such drugs. As the majority of patients with bone or joint disease who are likely to be ingesting chondroprotective drugs share similar clinicodemographic characteristics with those at higher risk of kidney injury, additional attention to this population is needed [35].
In the present study, we identified the causal effect of chondroitin intake on reduced kidney function using MR analysis. Several randomized placebo-controlled trials for chondroitin and glucosamine did not exhibit adverse effects related to kidney function [8,10,32,36]. However, MR analysis tests the lifetime effect of genetically predicted modifiable exposure on an outcome; thus, our study suggests that long-term kidney effects from such substance use may be clinically significant. In this regard, our findings suggest that clinicians should carefully monitor long-term chondroprotective agent use, particularly in patients at high risk of kidney function impairment. Our results are supported by previous reports that raised concerns regarding the nephrotoxic effects of chondroprotective drugs and their impact on kidney function. [15,16,17]. A few patients who regularly ingested glucosamine exhibited a decline in kidney function without any other precipitating factors, and acute or chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis was confirmed in kidney biopsies. Following the discontinuation of glucosamine, the eGFR of patients with glucosamine-related tubulointerstitial nephritis showed some improvement; however, their kidney function did not fully recover to baseline, and they remained in chronic kidney disease status. In an experimental study, glucosamine-related nephrotoxicity has been suggested to be associated with apoptosis in kidney tubular and mesangial cells with overexpression of transforming growth factor-β and connective tissue growth factor [17]. As these factors are responsible for mesangial and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, it is possible that chondroprotective drug-related kidney injuries may involve an irreversible component.
The anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties of various vitamins and minerals that prevent kidney injury have been proposed in previous experimental studies. [37,38,39,40,41,42]. Our findings are in line with those of previous studies, suggesting a potential kidney-protective effect of ingesting regular vitamin/mineral supplements in the general population. Nevertheless, further interventional studies are needed to identify the effect and an adequate dose for preserving kidney function, as the current MR analysis relies on self-reporting of vitamin/mineral supplement intake with varying product content and quality.
The current study had some limitations. First, the regular use of dietary supplements was ascertained by self-reporting at baseline. In addition, the details of drug intake, including dosage, components, and duration, were not provided, thus weakening the study findings. Second, there might be a possibility of weak instrumental bias in validation analyses, as some of the exposure and outcome samples obtained from the UKB may overlap [26]. The discrepancies in MR results for glucosamine intake in the main and replication analyses may be explained by this; thus, the possibility of a false negative may not be excluded. Third, because genetic instruments reflect lifetime exposure, transient changes in a higher degree of supplementary drug intake may have a greater impact on kidney function. Fourth, the study population was mainly white Europeans; therefore, generalizability was not identified for other ethnicities.

Conclusions

This MR study suggests that regular chondroitin intake reduces eGFR. Clinicians should understand the potential adverse effects of chondroprotective drugs on kidney function and consider regular monitoring of laboratory parameters. Further studies are warranted to identify the underlying mechanisms of chondroitin and glucosamine intake and impairment of kidney function.

Authors Contributions

JMC, JHK, SGK, SL, YK, SC, YCK, SSH, HL, and JPL performed the main statistical analysis including data curation, formal analysis, and investigation. KK contributed to the investigation and methodology. KWJ, CSL, YSK, DKK, and SP contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. SP advised on statistical aspects and interpreted the data. DKK and SP offer advice regarding the data interpretation and supervised. DKK and SP obtained funding and supervised the overall project. All of the authors participated in drafting the manuscript. All of the authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version to be published.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Funding

Not applicable

Data availability statement

All data used in this work are presented in the Supplemental materials that accompany the manuscript and are available in the original publications. The data used in this study is publicly available on the consortium website of The CKDGen (URL: https://ckdgen.imbi.uni-freiburg.de/).

Disclosures

None of the authors declare disclosures.

References

  1. Perazella, M.A. Pharmacology behind Common Drug Nephrotoxicities. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018, 13, 1897–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perazella, M.A. Renal vulnerability to drug toxicity. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009, 4, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barnes, P.M.; Bloom, B.; Nahin, R.L. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report 2008, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sibbritt, D.; Adams, J.; Lui, C.W.; et al. Who uses glucosamine and why? A study of 266,848 Australians aged 45 years and older. PLoS One 2012, 7, e41540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jordan, K.M.; Arden, N.K.; Doherty, M. .; et al. EULAR Recommendations 2003, an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003, 62, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fransen, M.; Agaliotis, M.; Nairn, L.; et al. Glucosamine and chondroitin for knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating single and combination regimens. Ann Rheum Dis 2015, 74, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McAlindon, T.E.; LaValley, M.P.; Gulin, J.P.; et al. Glucosamine and chondroitin for treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic quality assessment and meta-analysis. Jama 2000, 283, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Clegg, D.O.; Reda, D.J.; Harris, C.L.; et al. Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 2006, 354, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bascoul-Colombo, C.; Garaiova, I.; Plummer, S.F.; et al. Glucosamine Hydrochloride but Not Chondroitin Sulfate Prevents Cartilage Degradation and Inflammation Induced by Interleukin-1α in Bovine Cartilage Explants. Cartilage 2016, 7, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reginster, J.Y.; Deroisy, R.; Rovati, L.C.; et al. Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2001, 357, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. du Souich, P.; García, A.G.; Vergés, J.; et al. Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of chondroitin sulphate. J Cell Mol Med 2009, 13, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Olaseinde, O.F.; Owoyele, B.V. Chondroitin and glucosamine sulphate reduced proinflammatory molecules in the DRG and improved axonal function of injured sciatic nerve of rats. Sci Rep 2022, 12, 3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. King, D.E.; Xiang, J. Glucosamine/Chondroitin and Mortality in a US NHANES Cohort. J Am Board Fam Med 2020, 33, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, T.; et al. Glucosamine Use, Inflammation, and Genetic Susceptibility, and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Study in UK Biobank. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahmad, R. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis induced by glucosamine. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007, 22, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guillaume, M.P.; Peretz, A. Possible association between glucosamine treatment and renal toxicity: comment on the letter by Danao-Camara. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 44, 2943–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gueye, S.; Saint-Cricq, M.; Coulibaly, M.; et al. Chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy induced by glucosamine: a case report and literature review. Clin Nephrol 2016, 86, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Burgess, S.; Davey Smith, G.; Davies, N.M.; et al. Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations. Wellcome Open Res 2019, 4, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y.; et al. A Mendelian randomization study found causal linkage between telomere attrition and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2021, 100, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y.; et al. Short or Long Sleep Duration and CKD: A Mendelian Randomization Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020, 31, 2937–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y.; et al. Atrial fibrillation and kidney function: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Eur Heart J 2021, 42, 2816–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zheng, J.; Ni, C.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Association of regular glucosamine use with incident dementia: evidence from a longitudinal cohort and Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med 2023, 21, 114. [Google Scholar]
  23. Staley, J.R.; Blackshaw, J.; Kamat, M.A.; et al. PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 3207–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wuttke, M.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; et al. A catalog of genetic loci associated with kidney function from analyses of a million individuals. Nat Genet 2019, 51, 957–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Group. KDIGOKCW. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney international 2013, 1–150. [Google Scholar]
  26. Burgess, S.; Davies, N.M.; Thompson, S.G. Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization. Genet Epidemiol 2016, 40, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stanzick, K.J.; Li, Y.; Schlosser, P.; et al. Discovery and prioritization of variants and genes for kidney function in >1.2 million individuals. Nat Commun 2021, 12, 4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bowden, J.; Davey Smith, G.; Burgess, S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 2015, 44, 512–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bowden, J.; Davey Smith, G.; Haycock, P.C.; et al. Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol 2016, 40, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bycroft, C.; Freeman, C.; Petkova, D.; et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 2018, 562, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bucsi, L.; Poór, G. Efficacy and tolerability of oral chondroitin sulfate as a symptomatic slow-acting drug for osteoarthritis (SYSADOA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998, 6 (Suppl A), 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bourgeois, P.; Chales, G.; Dehais, J.; et al. Efficacy and tolerability of chondroitin sulfate 1200 mg/day vs chondroitin sulfate 3 x 400 mg/day vs placebo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998, 6 (Suppl A), 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Leonberg-Yoo, A.K.; Johnson, D.; Persun, N.; et al. Use of Dietary Supplements in Living Kidney Donors: A Critical Review. Am J Kidney Dis 2020, 76, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Setnikar, I.; Rovati, L.C. Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of glucosamine sulfate. A review. Arzneimittelforschung 2001, 51, 699–725. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Sharma, L. Osteoarthritis of the Knee. N Engl J Med 2021, 384, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mazières, B.; Hucher, M.; Zaïm, M.; et al. Effect of chondroitin sulphate in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dennis, J.M.; Witting, P.K. Protective Role for Antioxidants in Acute Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Elbassuoni, E.A.; Ragy, M.M.; Ahmed, S.M. Evidence of the protective effect of l-arginine and vitamin D against monosodium glutamate-induced liver and kidney dysfunction in rats. Biomed Pharmacother 2018, 108, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, P.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Protective effect of vitamin E against acute kidney injury. Biomed Mater Eng 2015, 26 (Suppl 1), S2133–S2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, F.; Wen, Y.; Hu, X.; et al. The Potential Use of Vitamin C to Prevent Kidney Injury in Patients with COVID-19. Diseases 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salehzadeh, A.; Salehzadeh, A.; Maghsood, A.H.; et al. Effects of vitamin A and vitamin E on attenuation of amphotericin B-induced side effects on kidney and liver of male Wistar rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020, 27, 32594–32602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rapa, S.F.; Di Iorio, B.R.; Campiglia, P.; et al. Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Chronic Kidney Disease-Potential Therapeutic Role of Minerals, Vitamins and Plant-Derived Metabolites. Int J Mol Sci 2019, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated