Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review

Version 1 : Received: 27 June 2023 / Approved: 28 June 2023 / Online: 28 June 2023 (09:49:46 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Rodríguez-Suárez, C.-A.; González-de la Torre, H.; Hernández-De Luis, M.-N.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, D.-Á.; Martínez-Alberto, C.-E.; Brito-Brito, P.-R. Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2449. Rodríguez-Suárez, C.-A.; González-de la Torre, H.; Hernández-De Luis, M.-N.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, D.-Á.; Martínez-Alberto, C.-E.; Brito-Brito, P.-R. Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2449.

Abstract

The nursing process in clinical practice can be assessed using standardized language systems. The purpose is to find evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification, and Nursing Outcome Classification improving diag-nostic accuracy, nursing interventions, health outcomes, and people’s satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo and LILACS including randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to outcomes, 6 evaluated improvements in diagnostic accuracy and 11 evaluated improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies evaluated improvements in intervention efficacy or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address diagnostic accuracy and indi-viduals’ health outcomes using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification, and Nursing Outcome Classification; as well as implementing studies that evaluate the use of these terminologies for improvements in the efficacy of nurses' interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process.

Keywords

Standardized Nursing Terminology; Nursing Process; Nursing Care; Effectiveness; Systematic Review

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Nursing

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.