Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Ergonomic Workload Evaluation of Motor-Manual Tree Processing
Version 1
: Received: 6 July 2023 / Approved: 7 July 2023 / Online: 7 July 2023 (13:09:19 CEST)
How to cite: Pavlíková, E. A.; Nevrkla, P.; Rohrich, M. Ergonomic Workload Evaluation of Motor-Manual Tree Processing. Preprints 2023, 2023070511. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.0511.v1 Pavlíková, E. A.; Nevrkla, P.; Rohrich, M. Ergonomic Workload Evaluation of Motor-Manual Tree Processing. Preprints 2023, 2023070511. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.0511.v1
Abstract
The aim of the work was to carry out an ergonomic assessment of the workload when working with a chainsaw during motor-manual tree processing. Wearable technology was used, namely Garmin, Biostrap and Whoop devices, which are generally available. The dependence of the heart rate (HR) on physical workload was examined to calculate Heart Rate Index. The case study was done with one worker, three variations of chainsaw devices cutting the poplar wood. It was proved that the use of a heavier work tool, MS 500i /90 cm 9,3 kg, significantly contributes both to the creation of a non-physiological working position and to an increase in the energy required to perform work, which was represented by an increase in heart rate. With a lighter work tool and a shorter cutting blade, both a decrease in heart rate and a reduction in the working time were performed in a non-physiological position. The results can be used in common practice for workers´ self-assessment to increase safety and health protection at work or work productivity not only in motor-manual processing in forestry related professions.
Keywords
tree processing; ergonomic evaluation; workload; heart rate; wearable technology
Subject
Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment