The proofs of the following Theorems are too loaded with indices to calculate, and we are trying to make them a little simpler by separating them case by case, to avoid the difficulty of calculations!
Proof.
Case 1. The cubic-matrix A of order 2, (and B has order 2), we will proof the case 1 for each "horizontal layer", "vertical page" and "vertical layer", as following:
1. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrix of order 2, where all elements on the plan
are identical in both matrices, then based on definition of determinant of cubic-matrix presented in [
2] and [
1] we have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases. Similarly we will proof for all other cases.
2. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 2, where all elements on the plan
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
3. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 2, where all elements on the plan
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
4. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 2, where all elements on the plan
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
5. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 2, where all elements on the plan
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
6. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 2, where all elements on the plan
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
Case 2. The cubic-matrix A of order 3, (and B has order 3), we will proof the case 1 for each "horizontal layer", "vertical page" and "vertical layer", as following:
1. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
Hence,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
2. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
Hence,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
3. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
while,
Hence,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
4. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
5. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
6. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
7. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then have:
while,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
8. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
Whereas,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
9. For plan
: Let
A and
B be cubic-matrices of order 3, where all elements on the plan
and
are identical in both matrices, then we have:
Whereas,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
□
Proof. Case 1. The cubic-matrix A of order 2, (and B has order 2), we will proof the case 1 for each "vertical page" and "vertical layer", as following:
1. For plan
: Let us add first vertical page to second vertical page while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
2. For plan
: Let us add second vertical page to first vertical page while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
3. For plan
: Let us add first vertical page to second vertical layer while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
4. For plan
: Let us add second vertical page to first vertical layer while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
Case 2. The cubic-matrix A of order 3, (and B has order 3), we will proof the case 2 for each "vertical page" and "vertical layer", as following:
1. For plan
: Let us add first vertical page to second vertical page while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
2. For plan
: Let us add first vertical page to third vertical page while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
3. For plan
: Let us add second vertical page to third vertical page while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
4. For plan
: Let us add first vertical layer to second vertical layer while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
5. For plan
: Let us add first vertical layer to third vertical layer while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
6. For plan
: Let us add first vertical layer to third vertical layer while multiplying by a scalar
.
Whereas,
After expanding further we get the following result,
If we compare results of above equations, we can see that we have the same result in both cases.
Proof. Case 1. The cubic-matrix A of order 2 with two identical "Vertical Pages" or two identical "Vertical Layers", we will proof the case 1, as following:
1. For two identical "Vertical Pages":
2. For two identical "Vertical Layers":
Case 2. The cubic-matrix A of order 3 with two identical "Vertical Pages" or two identical "Vertical Layers", we will proof the case 1, as following:
1. For two identical "Vertical Pages", first "Vertical Page" identical to second "Vertical Page":
2. For two identical "Vertical Pages", first "Vertical Page" identical to third "Vertical Page":
3. For two identical "Vertical Pages", second "Vertical Page" identical to third "Vertical Page":
4. For two identical "Vertical Layers", first "Vertical Layer" identical to second "Vertical Layer":
5. For two identical "Vertical Layers", first "Vertical Layer" identical to third "Vertical Layer":
6. For two identical "Vertical Layers", second "Vertical Layer" identical to third "Vertical Layer":
□