1. Introduction
The fascinating microstructural and surface properties of biomass-based carbon materials justify the extensive interest in their application in various fuel cells [
1,
2,
3], supercapacitors [
4,
5] and alkaline ion batteries [
6,
7,
8]. Compared to terrestrial biomass the potential of marine-based sources, despite their abundance, is far less explored. Crustaceans rich in N-containing chitin, or edible red seaweed with reasonable sulfated polysaccharide content also may serve as precursors for N or S containing porous carbon materials [
9,
10,
11].
Porous carbons with high surface area, rich porosity and tuned surface chemistry are essential to boost their electrochemical properties. The high surface area, which goes hand in hand with microporous texture and facilitates the exposure of active sites, might, however, limit the diffusion-controlled processes. In contrast, macroporous materials exhibit better transport kinetics, but their correspondingly lower surface area hampers the number of the exposed active sites, and therefore results in poorer surface area related performance. Well-tailored porous carbons with interconnected pore morphology make it possible to fabricate high-performance electrodes in fuel cells, as battery anodes [
12] and high-rate electrochemical capacitive energy storage devices [
13]. In fuel cells the ultra-micro and micropores are pseudo active sites for adsorption and cleavage of O
2 molecules, while the meso- and macropores promote the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) by facilitating the mass transfer [
14,
15,
16]. Ultra-micropores of similar size to O
2 molecules act as pseudo catalytic centers. They stimulate the O
2 adsorption and consequently promote O = O bond splitting, fostering the ORR through the 4 e
- reduction mechanism [
17]. The enhanced interface between the electrolyte and the electrodes shortens the ion transport pathways, fosters electrolyte penetration, and facilitates mass transport and ion diffusion in Li-ion batteries as well as in supercapacitors [
18,
19,
20,
21]. Excessive widening of the pores decreases the coulombic efficiency and thus the reversible capacity of batteries; however, pores that are too narrow restrict the access of the bulky solvated Li-ions. Fine tuning of the carbon microstructure is therefore necessary for an effective balance between rate performance and storage capacity [
22]. The bulky Li-ions solvated in a tetrahedral arrangement within the electrolyte [
23] become intercalated and stored in the nanopores of the electrode in de-solvated form. The maximum Li-ion storage capacity can be achieved when the actual size of the Li-ion fits perfectly into the pore size. The benefits of carbon aerogels as anode materials in lithium-ion batteries can be manifested in three aspects: i) the carbon skeleton is a good electronic conductor that can ensure efficient electron transport; ii) the 3D interconnected and open porous framework facilitates the electrolyte penetration and provide fast Li ion diffusion channels; iii) the open interconnected pores offer enough space to accommodate the volume changes (expansion and contraction during repeated charge – discharge processes) of the electroactive materials, thus helping to maintain the structural and thereby electrochemical stability during cell cycling [
24,
25,
26].
Besides the pore structure the other key factor is the surface chemistry of the carbons. The fundamentals of both texture and surface chemistry design and the corresponding challenges of nanostructured mesoporous carbon materials including carbon gels and their application were summarized by Enterría et al [
27]. While the parameters of the sol-gel synthesis technique can be used to tune the adsorption and diffusion characteristics of carbon aerogels, non-metallic heteroatoms (e.g., B, N, O, P, S) generate additional active sites and defects, increase the activity and/or selectivity of the electrochemical processes, and construct more channels for electron and ion transfer [
28,
29,
30].
Although the role of the various N species in the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction process is not fully elucidated, the graphitic and/or pyridinic nitrogen atoms seem to be the most efficient ones in the ORR [
31,
32,
33,
34]. Pyridinic nitrogens present in the carbon structure are Lewis bases, while graphitic or quaternary N may act as n-type dopants in amorphous carbon structures. The higher electronegativity of N (3.04
vs. 2.55 of C) facilitates the electron transfer and increases the charge density on the neighboring carbon atom, thus fostering the electrical conductivity, polarity, and surface wettability. In consequence, N doping enhances the high-rate capability in Li-ion battery anode applications and the pseudo-capacitance in supercapacitor applications [
35,
36,
37,
38].
The large covalent radius of the S atoms alters the electronic and metallic properties of the carbon matrix [
39]. Sulfoxide, sulfones, and sulfonic acids located in the mesopores foster the access of the electrolyte delivering dissolved oxygen into the pore system [
40]. The thiophenic sulfur compounds appear to be particularly active in enhancing the physisorption of the oxygen from electrolytes in small carbon pores [
40]. The S atom incorporated in aromatic rings causes a slightly positive charge on the neighboring C atoms [
40,
41] and brings additional hydrophobicity to the surface, thus promoting the adsorption of molecular oxygen [
34].
DFT calculations revealed that dual S and N doping results in a large number of active sites through the redistribution of spin and charge densities, thus synergistically improving the ORR performance [
41]. Atomic level distribution of (hetero)atoms in the porous carbon matrix significantly improves the rate of the ORR, which is otherwise too slow for practical applications [
42,
43]. They also affect the performance of supercapacitors [
44]. They reduce or may even prevent the need for Pt loading, which is an economic obstacle in commercializing fuel cells. N, P, and S atoms in biomass-based carbon electrodes act as extra active Li-ion storage sites [
45,
46]. The kinetics of the electrochemical reaction in heteroatom doped carbons are much faster, resulting in higher capacity and better rate performance. The C-S defect sites induce torsion in the graphitic layer structure and the extended interlayer spacing facilitates the insertion of lithium ions during the charge – discharge cycling of the cells [
47].
Nanocarbons (carbon nanotubes, carbide and carbonitride graphene) themselves may form electrically conductive interconnected aerogel matrix through van der Waals interactions [
48]. Graphene, due to its outstanding properties (high electrical and thermal conductivity, good mechanical strength) plays a particularly important role in the development of a new generation of batteries. Their surface area, mechanical flexibility, and broad electrochemical window [
49] make graphene-based electrodes promising for fuel cells [
50], batteries [
51,
52,
53], supercapacitors [
54,
55,
56,
57], etc. Graphene oxide (GO) has been used as a platform [
58] for the facile synthesis of N-doped graphene-like catalysts using e.g., urea [
59], or polypyrrole [
60] as doping agents. The thermal/annealing treatment during the synthesis converts the GO to reduced GO (rGO) and at least partly restore the desired sheet-like structure and physico-chemical properties of the electrocatalytically more attracting graphene.
Although thermal insulation and electric conductivity are uniquely combined in carbon aerogels, incorporation of carbon nanoparticles can considerably improve their electric properties. These particles can be also used as templating agents [
61] and/or conductive additives [
62]. Incorporation of 0.23 – 0.46 wt% well dispersed GO into the resorcinol – formaldehyde (RF) polymer xerogel precursor resulted in a carbon xerogel of high porosity and of excellent electrical conductivity: when used as electrode in aqueous supercapacitors at high current density, the capacitance and the power were enhanced by 25 and 100 %, respectively, compared of the undoped carbon xerogel [
63]. It was also concluded that the electrical conductivity seems to play a more important role than the specific surface area in the electrode performance of mesoporous carbon xerogels. The optimum GO loading was below 2 wt% as higher loadings resulted in lower energy and power densities in spite of the increased electric conductivity [
64]. In Li-ion batteries, graphene-doped carbon/carbon aerogel electrodes can accommodate lithium more easily than the common graphite anode [
49]: in addition to the intercalation mechanism, they can exhibit fast lithium adsorption [
23,
65,
66], defect trapping [
67], build-up of faradaic capacitance [
68], etc.
In spite of the intensive studies on the performance of electrodes fabricated from carbons doped with two heteroatoms or carbon nanoparticles, their simultaneous application is rare [
69,
70] and none of them addressed the influence of the nanoparticle concentration. Recently our group studied the oxygen reduction activity of a N, S co-doped metal free carbon synthesized from a ι-carreageenan – urea polymer cryogel precursor [
71]. In this work we use the same matrix to synthesize GO-doped carbons with interconnected porous structure and high surface area to study the influence of the added GO on the morphology and chemistry of the carbon cryogel obtained. In RF based carbon xerogels developed for electric application the optimal GO content was found below 2 wt % [
64]. Li et al [
69] incorporated 4 wt% SWCNT, while the other group [
70] added 13 wt% GO in the polymer precursor. Earlier we found that in responsive 3D poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) networks the percolation threshold was around 5 wt% related to the polymer matrix [
72]. Based on these references the GO content was varied between 1.25 and 5 wt%. The texture of the carbon cryogels was characterized by electron microscopic imaging, N
2 and CO
2 adsorption measurements, Raman spectroscopy and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), SEM supported electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), ultimate elemental analysis and FTIR were used to study the surface and bulk chemistry. The samples were probed as electrodes i) in a fuel cell under conditions, similar to alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells and ii) in Li-ion batteries in order to reveal the effect of the rGO in these applications.
Figure 1.
Typical images of CA (a), the GO cryogel (b), and the CAGO50 sample (c).
Figure 1.
Typical images of CA (a), the GO cryogel (b), and the CAGO50 sample (c).
Figure 2.
(a) Low temperature N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of annealed carbons; (b) Combined pore size distribution functions of annealed carbons. Functions were estimated by quenched solid density functional theory QSDFT, slit/cylinder geometry for N2 and NLDFT for CO2, respectively.
Figure 2.
(a) Low temperature N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of annealed carbons; (b) Combined pore size distribution functions of annealed carbons. Functions were estimated by quenched solid density functional theory QSDFT, slit/cylinder geometry for N2 and NLDFT for CO2, respectively.
Figure 3.
Decomposition of C1s, O1s, N1s and S2p regions of photoelectron spectra of the CAGO100 sample.
Figure 3.
Decomposition of C1s, O1s, N1s and S2p regions of photoelectron spectra of the CAGO100 sample.
Figure 4.
Cathodic linear potential sweep of the carbon xerogel loaded electrodes in oxygen saturated 0.1 M KOH. Loading: 75 μg/cm2, sweep rate: 5 mV/s. Rotation rate: 400 (blue), 625 (black), 900 (red), 1250 (green) rpm, (increasing downwards). Rotation rates were applied in the following order: 625, 900, 1250, 400 rpm. LSVs on Pt/C were measured for comparison.
Figure 4.
Cathodic linear potential sweep of the carbon xerogel loaded electrodes in oxygen saturated 0.1 M KOH. Loading: 75 μg/cm2, sweep rate: 5 mV/s. Rotation rate: 400 (blue), 625 (black), 900 (red), 1250 (green) rpm, (increasing downwards). Rotation rates were applied in the following order: 625, 900, 1250, 400 rpm. LSVs on Pt/C were measured for comparison.
Figure 5.
Koutecky-Levich (KL) plots of the carbon electrodes at E = 0.3 V. The theoretical 2 e- and 4 e- KL plots are shown for comparison.
Figure 5.
Koutecky-Levich (KL) plots of the carbon electrodes at E = 0.3 V. The theoretical 2 e- and 4 e- KL plots are shown for comparison.
Figure 6.
Cyclic voltammograms (1) of the virgin electrode; (2) after 50 cycles in oxygen-free 0.1 M KOH electrolyte; (3) after additional 50 cycles in oxygen-saturated electrolytes; (4) after an additional ORR test with rotating electrode (sweep rate: 5 mV/s, four rotation rates). The column graph compares the gravimetric capacitances of the carbons corresponding to CV 1 (black), 2 (red), 3 (green) and 4 (blue), respectively.
Figure 6.
Cyclic voltammograms (1) of the virgin electrode; (2) after 50 cycles in oxygen-free 0.1 M KOH electrolyte; (3) after additional 50 cycles in oxygen-saturated electrolytes; (4) after an additional ORR test with rotating electrode (sweep rate: 5 mV/s, four rotation rates). The column graph compares the gravimetric capacitances of the carbons corresponding to CV 1 (black), 2 (red), 3 (green) and 4 (blue), respectively.
Figure 7.
Galvanostatic charge – discharge profiles of CA, CAGO50, CAGO100 and CAGO200 at constant current density 100 mA/g, cycle 1 grey, cycle 10 red, cycle 20 blue, cycle 30 green, cycle 40 purple, cycle 50 gold.
Figure 7.
Galvanostatic charge – discharge profiles of CA, CAGO50, CAGO100 and CAGO200 at constant current density 100 mA/g, cycle 1 grey, cycle 10 red, cycle 20 blue, cycle 30 green, cycle 40 purple, cycle 50 gold.
Figure 8.
Long-term cycling performance of CA, CAGO50, CAGO100, and CAGO200.
Figure 8.
Long-term cycling performance of CA, CAGO50, CAGO100, and CAGO200.
Table 1.
Porous characteristics of annealed carbon aerogel samples from gas adsorptionmeasurements*.
Table 1.
Porous characteristics of annealed carbon aerogel samples from gas adsorptionmeasurements*.
Method |
Parameter |
Units |
CA |
CAGO50 |
CAGO100 |
CAGO200 |
From N2 |
SBET |
[m2/g] |
1070 |
1479 |
1779 |
933 |
V0.98 |
[cm3/g] |
0.83 |
1.33 |
1.72 |
0.71 |
Vmicro,DR |
[cm3/g] |
0.42 |
0.54 |
0.64 |
0.34 |
[%] |
51 |
40 |
37 |
48 |
Vmicro,DFT |
[cm3/g] |
0.31 |
0.40 |
0.48 |
0.25 |
[%] |
37 |
30 |
28 |
35 |
From CO2 |
Vumicro,DR |
[cm3/g] |
0.073 |
0.062 |
0.059 |
0.041 |
Vumicro,DFT |
[cm3/g] |
0.042 |
0.039 |
0.030 |
0.025 |
Table 2.
Surface composition (atomic %) measured by XPS.
Table 2.
Surface composition (atomic %) measured by XPS.
Sample |
C |
O |
N |
S |
O / C |
N / C |
S / C |
O+N+S C |
S / N |
CA |
90.6 |
3.3 |
5.1 |
1.0 |
0.036 |
0.056 |
0.011 |
0.104 |
0.196 |
CAGO50 |
92.0 |
3.1 |
3.7 |
1.3 |
0.034 |
0.039 |
0.014 |
0.087 |
0.361 |
CAGO100 |
90.7 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
1.2 |
0.045 |
0.045 |
0.013 |
0.104 |
0.293 |
CAGO200 |
90.4 |
3.7 |
4.4 |
1.4 |
0.041 |
0.049 |
0.015 |
0.105 |
0.318 |
GO-film |
67.4 |
32.1 |
- |
0.5 |
0.476 |
- |
0.007 |
0.484 |
- |
Table 3.
Decomposition of C1s and O1s regions of photoelectron spectra: binding energy ranges, chemical state assignations and surface compositions (atomic %).
Table 3.
Decomposition of C1s and O1s regions of photoelectron spectra: binding energy ranges, chemical state assignations and surface compositions (atomic %).
|
C1s |
O1s |
|
C1 |
C2 |
C3 |
O1 |
O2 |
O3 |
Chemical state |
sp2 C=C |
C–O C–N C–S |
C=O O–C–O N–C–O |
S–O |
C–O–C C–OH C=O |
OC–O–CO (H2O) |
Binding energy [eV] |
284.3 – 284.4 |
285.7 – 285.8 |
287.5 – 287.9 |
530.2 – 530.6 |
532.1 – 532.5 |
533.9 – 534.3 |
CA |
74.0 |
10.9 |
5.4 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
|
CAGO50 |
78.8 |
7.4 |
5.5 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
|
CAGO100 |
74.7 |
11.0 |
4.8 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
0.7 |
CAGO200 |
75.9 |
9.4 |
4.8 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
0.5 |
Table 4.
Decomposition of N1s and S2p regions of photoelectron spectra: binding energy ranges, chemical state assignations and surface compositions (atomic %).
Table 4.
Decomposition of N1s and S2p regions of photoelectron spectra: binding energy ranges, chemical state assignations and surface compositions (atomic %).
|
N1s |
S2p |
|
N1 |
N2 |
N3 |
S1 |
S2 |
Chemical state |
C–N |
OO–C–N |
C–N+
|
C–S |
C–SO3
|
Binding energy [eV] |
397.8 – 398.0 |
400.4 – 400.5 |
402.4 – 402.7 |
164.9 – 165.0 |
168.3 – 168.6 |
CA |
2.3 |
2.3 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
CAGO50 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
n.d. |
CAGO100 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
CAGO200 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
Table 5.
Comparison of the onset potentials and half wave potentials of double doped carbon aero/xero/cryogel electrodes in 0.1 M KOH, vs. RHE.
Table 5.
Comparison of the onset potentials and half wave potentials of double doped carbon aero/xero/cryogel electrodes in 0.1 M KOH, vs. RHE.
Sample |
BET surface area [m2/g] |
Onset potential [mV] |
E1/2 [mV] |
Number of e- transferred |
Ref. |
SWCNT@N,P doped carbon |
616 |
920 |
850 |
3.91 |
[69] |
N,S co-doped 3D rGO |
392 |
895 |
732 |
3.87 |
[70] |
N,S porous carbon materials |
732 |
940 |
840 |
- |
[95] |
N,P-holey graphene foams |
758 |
983 |
865 |
3.70 |
[96] |
3D-high performance graphene |
1406 |
928 |
836 |
3.83 |
[97] |
N,P porous graphitic biocarbon |
845 |
-14 (vs. Ag/AgCl) |
-115 (vs. Ag/AgCl) |
3.9 |
[98] |
N,P co-doped carbon |
375 |
950 |
820 |
3.7 |
[99] |
N,P,S co-doped carbon nanosheets |
1198 |
938 |
800 |
3.8 – 4.0 |
[100] |
P,N,S-porous carbon |
711 |
905 |
780 |
3.68 – 3.96 |
[101] |
N,P,B biocarbon |
1155 |
904 |
790 |
3.78 – 3.90 |
[102] |
Pt/C (20 wt.% Pt on Vulcan XC-72) |
- |
960 |
869 |
3.96 |
[102] |
CA |
1070 |
855 |
700 |
3.5 |
Our work |
CAGO50 |
1479 |
850 |
760 |
4.0 |
CAGO100 |
1779 |
845 |
730 |
3.1 |
CAGO200 |
933 |
825 |
700 |
2.0 |
Pt/C |
|
957 |
886 |
|
|