3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of GSH@AuAg NCs
The reductant NaBH
4 was introduced in the mixture of HAuCl
4, AgNO
3 and GSH to accelerate the metallic nucleation and growth, which moderated the restricted synthesis conditions. After GSH@AuAg NCs were formed, the rate of NaBH
4 reduction was limited by harmonizing reaction parameters, such as solution pH, amounts of reactants, and temperature. Therefore, the reaction conditions, such as the molar ratio of HAuCl
4 to AgNO
3 (Au/Ag), the concentrations of GSH and NaBH
4, and the pH were firstly optimized by detecting the fluorescence of produced GSH@AuAg NCs. The effect of Au/Ag ratio was examined in the presence of 0.5 mM HAuCl
4. The fluorescence intensity of GSH@AuAg NCs prepared at three pHs all increased gradually with the decreasing ratio of Au/Ag, and reached a maximum intensity at the molar ratio of 1:1 for pH 7-8 and 11-12, and 1:1.5 for pH 9-10 (
Figure 1A-C). More AgNO
3 resulted in the decrease of fluorescence intensity of GSH@AuAg NCs and the appearance of a shoulder peak around 560 nm, which should result from other distinct clusters. The equal concentrations of Au and Ag precursors for the brightest nanoclusters hinted the co-doping of Au and Ag.
The effect of GSH ligand concentration was examined at different pHs with 0.5 mM Au and Ag precursors and 0.75 mM NaBH
4 to show the brightest GSH@AuAg NCs at 1.0 mM of GSH (
Figure 1D-E). The GSH@AuAg NCs synthesized at pH 7-8 showed much stronger fluorescence intensity than those obtained at higher pHs. Thus pH 7.5 was selected for GSH@AuAg NCs synthesis.
The optimization of NaBH
4 concentration for GSH@AuAg NCs synthesis was performed at pH 7-8 with 0.5 mM Au and Ag precursors, and 1.0 mM GSH. The maximum fluorescence intensity occurred at 0.75 mM NaBH
4 (
Figure S1 in SI). The optimized reaction time was 15 min, and prolonged reaction time did not increase the fluorescence intensity of GSH@AuAg NCs (
Figure S2 in SI).
As the first reported co-reduction synthesis of GSH@AuAg NCs mediated by NaBH
4, the growth of GSH@AuAg NCs was investigated by UV-vis and fluorescence spectroscopy to understand the complex reduction assembly of Au and Ag precursors and GSH ligands. First, to confirm the doping synthesis of GSH@AuAg NCs rather than other luminous oligomeric clusters, spectroscopic analysis was performed by preparing the NCs in the absence of each reactant. The GSH@AuAg NCs did not exhibit obvious plasmon resonance absorption in the range of 400–700 nm, while a clear absorption peak appeared when the synthesis was performed in the absence of GSH or Au precursors (
Figure 2A). In addition, in the absence of Ag precursor, the reaction solution was transparent and the UV-vis absorbance was close to zero, which was similar with that in the absence of NaBH
4 [
Figure 2B, (3) and (5)], and could be attributed to the presence of GSH with two times higher concentration than HAuCl
4 to form stabilized Au (I)-GSH complexes, which limited the immediate reduction to Au (0) components [
21,
22]. In the absence of Au precursor, an absorption peak appeared at 450 nm and the solution became lilac color, which resulted from the formation of large Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) [
Figure 2B, (2)] due to the weaker stability of GSH and Ag
+ complexes. Interestingly, no fluorescence emission was observed in the absence of Au or Ag precursor (
Figure 2C), demonstrating that the fluorescence emission came from the bimetallic AuAg nanoclusters. In the absence of GSH a shield peak occurred at 560 nm [
Figure 2C, curve (4)], as observed in (
Figure 1), which eliminated the formation of the weak luminous metal (I)-GSH [M (I)-GSH] complexes. Besides, the mixture of Au and Ag precursors and GSH did not exhibit luminescence, which excluded the emission originating from oligomeric metal (I)-GSH complex. The above results confirmed that all reactants are indispensable for the formation of GSH@AuAg NCs.
To understand the interaction of Au and Ag precursors with GSH ligand, the ratio of GSH to Au precursor was changed while keeping the amount of GSH and total concentration of Au and Ag precursors at 1.0 mM to record the corresponding spectra. In the absence of Ag precursor, an absorption peak appeared at 520 nm, and the solution color turned deep reddish brown [
Figure 2D and E, (1)], indicating the formation of Au NPs, and the above protective function of GSH only occurred at higher ratio of GSH to Au precursor. Interestingly, the absorption peak of Au NPs at 520 nm completely disappeared, and the solution became light brown-yellow after only 0.1 mM Ag precursor was added. More Ag precursor decreased the absorbance and solution color become lighter till the presence of 0.5 mM Ag precursor [
Figure 2D and E, (3)-(5)]. The maximum fluorescence emission also occurred at 0.5 mM Au and Ag precursors (
Figure 2F), demonstrating the synergism stability induced by co-doped Au and Ag and the formation of GSH@AuAg NCs.
The fluorescence of metal nanoclusters (MNCs) can be considered to originate from the aggregated M(I)-thiolate oligomers due to the formation of core-shell structure to induce ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) or ligand-metal-metal charge transfer (LMMCT) [
21,
22]. At high ratios of GSH to Au precursor, no Au (0) component was formed due to the protective effect of GSH ligand, thus the core-shell typed aggregates could not be generated. While introducing Ag to decentralize the shielding of GSH as forming M(I)–GSH complex, the NaBH
4 initially reduced the Ag (I) to Ag (0) as a less weak protection against reducing Ag (I) to Ag (0). As the intertwined M(I)–GSH complexes made the Au(I) ions close to the Ag (0) surface to prompt the formation of core-shell type bimetallic clusters [
22].
To further understand the assembly of Au and Ag precursors and GSH ligand, the effect of the feeding pattern was examined to elucidate the formulation of GSH@AuAg NCs. The premixing of GSH ligand with Au precursor and later introduction of Ag precursor resulted in the growth of nanoclusters, which exhibited weaker luminosity and higher absorbance from 400 to 600 nm (
Figure 2G-I, curve a), compared with the feeding mode that pre-mixed Au and Ag precursors, and then added GSH (
Figure 2G-I, curve d), which showed the maximum luminosity, thus could be considered as an optimized sampling procedure (
Figure 2J). In the optimized sampling procedure, the yellow mixture of Au and Ag precursors was attributed to the formation of multiple complexes by the electrostatic interaction, the solution became white muddy upon addition of GSH due to the formation of mingled network of Metal-GSH complex, and the addition of NaOH and NaBH
4 produced brown-yellow GSH@AuAg NCs.
Another sampling procedure was premixing GSH ligand with Au precursor and then NaBH
4 to react for 5 min, and then adding Ag precursor for another 10 min (
Figure 2G-I, b). The absorbance of final solution was extremely low at 0.5 mM Au and Ag precursors (
Figure 2G, curve b1), which was different from that of the optimized sampling order (
Figure 2G, curve d). This demonstrated the influence of sampling order on the grow of GSH@AuAg NCs. In addition, further increasing the concentrations of Au precursor, both the color and absorption spectra of ultimate solution were close to that of the optimized sampling procedure, indicating the formation nanoclusters (
Figure 2G, curves b2 and b3). These results confirmed the molar ratios of GSH to metal precursors significantly affected the assembly of Au, Ag and GSH. Other sampling procedure, such as premixing GSH ligand with Ag precursor, then NaBH
4 to react for 5 min and then adding Au precursor, was also examined (
Figure 2G-I, c). After 5-min NaBH
4 reduction, the solution turned to lilac color, indicating the formation of large AgNPs as mentioned above. After introducing Au precursor (0.5 mM), the solution color gradually decayed to colorless, and the absorbance was also significantly reduced (
Figure 2G and H, curve c), suggesting the dissolution of AgNPs due to the interaction among Au, Ag, and GSH. The significantly weak emission intensity demonstrated the failure of GSH@AuAg NCs assembly.
Both TEM and AFM images of GSH@AuAg NCs formed with the optimized sampling procedure showed spherical morphology and well dispersion with an average diameter of about 2.0±0.4 nm (
Figure 3A-C). The clear lattice fringes were observed with an interspacing of 0.22 nm (inset in
Figure 3B), corresponding to the d-spacing of the crystal plane of face-centered cubic Au (111) [
23,
24]. XPS spectroscopy was then used to confirm the elemental composition of the GSH@AuAg NCs and the valence states of Au and Ag (
Figure 3D and E). The Au 4f XPS spectrum displayed a peak at 88.1 eV (Au 4f
5/2) and a splitting peak at 84.4 eV (Au 4f
7/2). The latter could be deconvoluted into two distinct components with the binding energies centered at 84.0 and 84.6 eV, assigned to Au (0) and Au (Ι), respectively. The predominant Au species in the GSH@AuAg NCs was identified as Au (Ι) (∼62.5%). The Ag 3d pattern exhibited two peaks at 374.1 eV (Ag 3d
3/2) and 368.1 eV (Ag 3d
5/2), and the latter was deconvoluted into Ag (I) at 368.4 eV and Ag (0) at 367.7 eV (
Figure 3E). The predominant Ag species in the GSH@AuAg NCs was identified as Ag (I) (∼63.7%), indicating the successful doped synthesis of GSH@AuAg NCs [
25,
26]. GSH showed a FTIR peak ascribed to -SH stretching vibration at 2512 cm
−1 [
27], which disappeared in the spectrum of GSH@AuAg NCs (
Figure 3F), while the FTIR peaks assigned to -NH
2 and -COOH groups at 1680, and 3383 cm
−1 remained [
28], demonstrating the binding of -SH with Au and Ag.