1. Introduction
About 50% of the total final energy consumption in the world attributes to the heat used in the residential and industrial sectors. With the rapid development of urbanization, the heating area of urban buildings in northern China increased from 5 billion m
2 to 15.6 billion m
2 from 2001 to 2020. In 2020, urban heating energy consumption in northern China was 214 million tons of standard coal, accounting for 20.2% of the total building energy consumption [
1]. And heating is not only an energy consumption issue but also a livelihood issue. In northern China, the average outdoor temperature in the heating season is relatively low. For example, the calculated outdoor temperature for heating in Zhangjiakou, Hebei is -13.6°C. In addition, space heating still relies on traditional energy sources such as coal and natural gas in northern China. While the spatial distribution of solar energy resources in China is highly consistent with traditional centralized heating areas, especially in the northern regions. Therefore, the development of solar heating in northern China not only has demand advantages but also resource advantages.
Solar heating systems with storage is very common. The salt gradient solar pond (SGSP) is one of these systems. Rghif et al. conducted extensive in-depth research to further improve the performance and efficiency of SGSP systems [
2,
3,
4,
5]. On the other hand, as STS can effectively solve the mismatch between the supply and demand of thermal energy in time and space. And the solar fraction and operational stability of the solar heating systems can be significantly improved. Thus, seasonal thermal storage technology has attracted increasing attention. Many researchers conducted performance analysis and operation strategies analysis.
Reasonable performance analysis of the system is the premise of establishing a solar heating system with STS. Tosatto et al. studied the environmental aspect and technical performance of large-scale thermal energy storage coupled with a heat pump in district heating systems. Results showed that the integration of the heat pump proves to be effective in increasing the thermal storage efficiency by 6% (from 87%) compared to the reference case without a heat pump in the case of an insulated tank thermal storage, and by 16% (from 64%) in case of an insulated shallow pit [
6]. Narula et al. present a new simulation method to assess a simulation method for modeling hourly energy flows in a district heating system integrated with STS. Based on the validation with the measured values of Friedrichshafen and Marstal, the annual energy flow could be closely replicated, while large monthly differences between simulations and measurements were reported [
7]. Ushamah et al. compared the performance of district heating systems with STS under different climatic conditions and identified the best suitable solar thermal technology. The conclusion was that the zone with a continental semi-arid climate was selected as the most suitable, with a STS efficiency of 61% and a solar fraction of 91% [
8]. Kim et al. evaluated the technology and economic performance of a hybrid renewable energy system with STS in South Korea using dynamic simulations and experimental results. Results showed that the proposed system reduced CO
2 emission by up to 61% compared with a centralized heat pump system and enhanced primary energy savings by up to 73% compared with gas-fired boilers [
9]. Chu et al. assessed the technically and economically feasible of a solar assisted precinct level heating system with STS for Australian cities, the results demonstrated that the proposed system could achieve technical and economic targets in all five Australian cities considered with optimal collector area and storage volume [
10]. Renaldi et al. established a validated simulation model to study the yearly performance of a solar district heating system with STS in UK. According to the study, solar collectors and long-term storage size have a more significant influence on the techno-economic metrics than short-term storage [
11]. Zhang et al. experimental investigated the dynamic thermal behaviors of a combined solar and ground source heat pump (SGHP) system with a dual storage tank for a single-family house on typical days [
12].
The design of reasonable operation strategies is an important factor to realize the stable operation of the system, the efficient integration of all parts of the system, and the reduction of system cost. Maragna et al. introduced a multi-source system and overall control strategies combining solar thermal collectors, borehole thermal energy storage, a heap pump, and a backup boiler. Monthly and typical day system performance were also analyzed, and the results illustrated that the energy balance is sensitive to the choice of the parameter values used for the controls [
13]. Li et al. compared the influence of control strategies of the solar collection subsystem on the system performance in the non-heating system. Note that the control strategies were significant for improving the heat collection performance of solar receiver, and also the stratification of STS has an impact on the collection efficiency of the receiver, especially at the end of the non-heating season [
14]. Villasmil et al. studied the performance of a solar heating system with STS under the variation of solar collector control strategies. The results showed that the required storage volume was minimized through the application of a low-flow controller, while the use of a high-flow controller or variable-flow controller led to an increase of 42 and 8% in the storage volume, respectively [
15]. Wang et al. proposed a feedback control strategy for an integrated solar and air-source heat pump water heating system, where the temperature of the heat storage tank was compared with the set temperature curve to determine whether to use an air-source heat pump for auxiliary heating. The reliability of the control strategy had been verified through simulation and experimental research, and the operational efficiency of the collector and air source heat pump had been significantly improved [
16]. Zhao et al. proposed a system operation control strategy and studied the annual operating performance of a solar heating system with seasonal water pool thermal storage in cold regions of China. Analysis revealed that the solar fraction of the system with the adjustment operation strategy during the heating period can reach 78.5% [
17].
As mentioned above, many scholars have done a lot of work concerning the performance assessment of the solar heating system with STS, and most previous studies focused on the techno-economic analysis based on the annual energy balance of the system, or the operation strategies analysis aiming at the solar circuit or thermal storage circuit. However, due to the instability of solar radiation resources and heat demand, it is necessary to balance the heat supply and demand throughout the year, and also to analyze the dynamic response characteristics and heating quality on a minute timescale. Yet, related studies are still scarce.
To fill the gaps mentioned above, based on a pilot solar heating system with STS in Huangdicheng, north China, a dynamic performance evaluation and operation strategies study is presented in this paper. The main novelties of the present study can be clarified as:
(1) The system’s dynamical performance was analyzed with a dynamic simulated method in a typical day or typical operation modes, and the switch mechanism between multiple operation modes was revealed on a minute timescale.
(2) The system can reach higher system performance with the proposed control strategies under different operation stages.
(3) The impact of different heating operation strategies on system performance was quantified. The performance indicators include the collection efficiency, the storage efficiency, the solar fraction of the system and the consumption of the circulation pump on the heating side.
The frame structure of the study is presented in
Figure 1. The concept of a pilot solar heating system with a solar tower receiver and STS is described in
Section 2.
Section 3 shows the analysis methods which include the system simulation method, operation strategies and performance evaluation metrics.
Section 4 shows the validation of the system model, the assessment of the dynamic performance of the system in different operation modes, the long-term performance and the analysis of operation strategies. Finally, the main conclusions of our study are summarized in
Section 5.
5. Conclusions
A pilot solar heating system with a solar tower receiver and STS was established. The dynamic performances of the system in different time scales were studied. Furthermore, a comparative study was conducted to investigate the influence of the operation strategies. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) The solar heating system with STS in our study has outstanding performance in different time scales. And through the switching of multiple operation modes, the system can operate stably and continuously under the fluctuation of solar radiation resources and heat demand. The significant mismatch between solar energy and heat load in northern China can be resolved.
(2) The quality-quantity operation strategies can be effective ways to improve the discharge efficiency of the STS and the system performance without the heat pump to utilize the thermal stored in the STS when the temperature of the STS is below the traditional heating supply temperature. The annual solar fraction of the system could be reached 85.9%. And the annual efficiency of STS was 56.1%. The electricity consumption of the pump on the heating side could be significantly reduced by 44.6% compared with the quality control.
(3) The solar fraction of the system was gradually improved. The solar fraction of the system reaches 89.4% in the third year, which is 3.6% higher than the first year. Although the solar tower collection system can improve the collection efficiency at the higher temperature, the operational temperature still affects the system performance, especially in the third year. Thus, reasonable control strategies of the whole system should be analyzed in different time dimensions, such as the long-term period.
(4) In order to promote the development of solar heating system with STS, scientific design methods for system configuration and operation strategies need to be addressed in the future. Based on the perfect forecasts for the weather and the SDH loads, the development of optimized control strategies is the focus of future research.
Figure 1.
Frame structure of this paper.
Figure 1.
Frame structure of this paper.
Figure 2.
Solar heating system with STS and solar receiver.
Figure 2.
Solar heating system with STS and solar receiver.
Figure 3.
The schematic of solar heating system.
Figure 3.
The schematic of solar heating system.
Figure 4.
Energy transfer at a node of buffer tank.
Figure 4.
Energy transfer at a node of buffer tank.
Figure 5.
The transfer relationship of energy flow of core components.
Figure 5.
The transfer relationship of energy flow of core components.
Figure 6.
TRNSYS simulation platform for the solar heating system.
Figure 6.
TRNSYS simulation platform for the solar heating system.
Figure 7.
Simulated and measured inlet and outlet of solar tower concentration system.
Figure 7.
Simulated and measured inlet and outlet of solar tower concentration system.
Figure 8.
Experimental and simulation values of temperature at different heights in STS (S-simulation, M-measured).
Figure 8.
Experimental and simulation values of temperature at different heights in STS (S-simulation, M-measured).
Figure 9.
Local typical annual meteorological data and heating load
Figure 9.
Local typical annual meteorological data and heating load
Figure 10.
Dynamic operation performance of solar receiver on a typical day.
Figure 10.
Dynamic operation performance of solar receiver on a typical day.
Figure 11.
Performance of continuous operation for one week.
Figure 11.
Performance of continuous operation for one week.
Figure 12.
Dynamic operation performance at the beginning of heating season.
Figure 12.
Dynamic operation performance at the beginning of heating season.
Figure 13.
Dynamic operation performance in the mid-heating season.
Figure 13.
Dynamic operation performance in the mid-heating season.
Figure 14.
Dynamic operation performance at the end of the heating season.
Figure 14.
Dynamic operation performance at the end of the heating season.
Figure 15.
Annual operation performance of the system.
Figure 15.
Annual operation performance of the system.
Figure 16.
Operation energy flow in the first year.
Figure 16.
Operation energy flow in the first year.
Figure 17.
Temperature changes of STS for three consecutive years.
Figure 17.
Temperature changes of STS for three consecutive years.
Figure 18.
System performance change over three continuous years.
Figure 18.
System performance change over three continuous years.
Figure 19.
System performance under different heating strategies.
Figure 19.
System performance under different heating strategies.
Figure 20.
The Contribution rate of different heat sources.
Figure 20.
The Contribution rate of different heat sources.
Table 1.
System equipment parameters.
Table 1.
System equipment parameters.
Program |
Property |
Quantity |
Unit |
Location |
Latitude |
40.23 N |
° |
Longitude |
115.43 E |
° |
Heliostats field |
Number of heliostats Area of heliostat Reflectivity |
66 11.2 0.9 |
m2
|
Solar receiver |
Daylighting area |
4.76 |
m2
|
Buffer tank |
Volume |
48 |
m3
|
Seasonal thermal storage |
Volume |
3000 |
m3
|
Heat exchanger |
Area |
30 |
m2
|
Table 2.
Main modules and parameters of the TRNSYS simulation platform.
Table 2.
Main modules and parameters of the TRNSYS simulation platform.
Project |
Name |
Type |
Notes |
Meteorological parameters |
Weather data |
Type 15-3 |
Calling in Typical annual meteorological data of Huailai obtained from the EnergyPlus website |
Heliostat field |
Hel |
Type 394 |
Calling in instantaneous efficiency of the heliostat field |
Receiver |
Receiver |
Type 155 |
Calling in structural parameters and mathematical models in MATLAB |
Circulating pump |
P(1~5) |
Type 110 |
Input the power curve of each circulation pump |
Underground seasonal thermal storage |
UGSTS |
Type 207 |
Self-developed model |
Buffer tank |
Buffer tank |
Type 531 |
Measured heat loss coefficient 0.34 W/(m2·°C) |
Operation control unit |
CON (1~3) |
Type 2b |
Temperature difference control |
CONTROL |
Calculator |
Logical control |
Data display or output |
Plotter |
Type 65d |
Display of results |
Month result |
Type 25c |
Output of results |
Diversion valve |
D (1~4) |
Type 11f |
Switch between different circulation routes |
Mixing valve |
M (1~4) |
Type 11d |
Switch between different circulation routes |
Heat exchanger |
HE |
Type 5b |
Counterflow, average heat transfer coefficient 100 W/K per m2 of collector area [23] |
Building load |
LOAD |
Type 12c |
Heat load per unit heating area 40 W/m2
|
Heating season controller |
SEASONAL |
Type 14 |
The heating season is from November 1st to April 1st of the following year |
Auxiliary fuel boiler |
Boiler |
Type 700 |
Rated power 170 kW, Boiler efficiency 0.9 |
Temperature control diverter valve |
D5 |
Type 11b |
The water supply temperature can reach the set temperature by mixing the supply and return water |
Table 3.
RMSE and maximum relative errors of the numerical results.
Table 3.
RMSE and maximum relative errors of the numerical results.
Location |
RMSD(°C) |
ARE(%) |
MRE(%) |
T1 (4.25m from STS bottom) |
1.10 |
0.42 |
1.52 |
T2 (3.45m from STS bottom) |
1.54 |
0.75 |
1.85 |
T3 (2.65m from STS bottom) |
0.79 |
0.45 |
0.28 |
T4 (1.85m from STS bottom) |
0.32 |
0.03 |
0.57 |
T5 (1.05m from STS bottom) |
1.23 |
0.75 |
1.63 |
T6 (0.25m from STS bottom) |
0.50 |
0.12 |
0.92 |
Inlet temperature of receiver |
1.12 |
2.49 |
6.0 |
Outlet temperature of receiver |
3.01 |
2.57 |
9.8 |
Table 4.
Test equipment and specifications
Table 4.
Test equipment and specifications
Measurement devices |
Type |
Range |
Accuracy |
Temperature sensor |
PT100 |
0~100 °C |
±0.5 °C |
Vortex Flowmeter |
HH-HYBLWGY-50 |
0~25 m³/h |
±1.0% |
Table 5.
Test equipment and specifications
Table 5.
Test equipment and specifications
Parameters |
Type of data |
Unit |
Relative error |
Average inlet temperature of solar receiver |
Measured |
°C |
3.783% |
Average outlet temperature of solar receiver |
Measured |
°C |
2.049% |
Average flowrate |
Measured |
m3/h |
1.058% |
Average temperature of STS |
Measured |
°C |
0.983% |