1. Introduction
Chitosan (CS), structurally composed of β-1,4-linked 2-amino-2-deoxy-β-D-glucose and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine units [
1], is a natural derivative of chitin and the second most abundant polysaccharide after cellulose [
2,
3,
4]. Among the various biopolymers, CS has attracted much attention for its remarkable biological and physical properties [
4], and exhibits a wide variety of environmentally beneficial properties, such as abundant availability, biodegradability, non-toxicity, biocompatibility, recyclability, physiological inertness and cell adhesion, stability to air and moisture, and cost-effectiveness. It also possesses antitumor, mucoadhesive, immunostimulant, antifungal, antimicrobial, antibacterial, antioxidant, hemostatic, and wound healing properties [
1,
2,
3,
4], which make it an ideal candidate for pharmaceutical, and industrial applications [
1,
2,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9]. In this context, CS can be employed as a recyclable green catalyst [
5], in supercapacitors and biopolymer batteries, sensors, and water treatment [
2,
4]. It also finds wide use in cosmetics, food technology as food packaging, and in biomedical field, particularly in bioimaging, tissue engineering, wound dressing, and the textile industry, as well as in the design and development of drug delivery systems, implants, contact lenses and protein binding [
1,
2,
3,
4,
10,
11,
12]. In particular, to design controlled release systems of CS-based drugs, the poor barrier and mechanical properties of CS can be modulated and improved by appropriately acting on the crosslinking process, and/or incorporating materials into CS films [
3,
6].
Once CS is solubilized in aqueous solutions under acid conditions, by protonation of its amine groups, it forms a gel in acetic acid, which can be precipitated in alkali to obtain spherical beads or physical hydrogels [
6,
8,
13]. The use of some cross-linking reagents, such as sodium tripoliphosphate (TPP) is affordable because it involves an easy-to-prepare procedure and without toxic chemicals. In fact, TPP is a nontoxic multivalent anion forming crosslinks by ionic interaction between its negatively charged counter ion and the protonated amine groups of CS, improving the cross-linking density, particle size and zeta potential between CS and TPP, by adjusting their concentration, and the bioavailability, stability and controlled release of drugs; thus, showing promise as delivery systems for anticancer drugs, proteins, and nucleic acids [
6,
11,
14,
15].
The practical application of CS-based macro-, micro-, or nano-particles produced by ionic crosslinking is attracting attention both commercially and industrially [
16] because of their intriguing properties for environmental applications, such as in catalytic processes [
17,
18], contaminant removal [
13], probiotic encapsulation and release under acid conditions [
19], and in biomedical field, where the design of CS-carriers is on the rise because CS behaves as an ideal pH-responsive and sensitive carrier for the delivery active ingredients due to the presence of positively charged pendant amino groups [
10,
16,
20], and also it is able to encapsulate and release an active principle, such as curcumin.
Curcumin (CUR), an orange-yellow hydrophobic polyphenol derived from the rhizomes of the herb
Curcuma longa, is another natural bioactive and therapeutic compound due to its anticarcinogenic, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal, antiviral, antimalarial, antioxidant, antimutagenic, cicatrizing, anti-inflammatory, anti-coagulant, anti-fertility, antiprotozal, antifibrotic, antivenom, antiulcer, hypotensive, anticholesteremic properties, and free-radical effects [
3,
5,
21,
22,
23]. Because of its flavoring properties, CUR is used as a food coloring, and as a traditional medicine in India and China for the treatment and prevention of several diseases, such as neurological, oncological, autoimmune, metabolic, cardiovascular, and diabetes, due to its extraordinary activities [
3,
4,
5,
22], which have attracted increasing interest from researchers to CUR [
24]. However, the use of CUR in therapeutic applications has been limited due to its poor bioavailability and water-solubility [
4,
25,
26]. In fact, CUR belongs to Class IV of Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), whose solubility is about 7.8 μg mL
-1, and several preparative alternatives have been developed to improve its solubility, such as solid lipid nanoparticle, solid dispersion, colloidal drug delivery systems, microemulsion, and multicomponent crystal [
23]. Encapsulation of CUR within materials, such as CS-based materials, is a strategic approach to improve its dispersibility in aqueous media, chemical stability, controlled release ability, bioactivity, and, thus, use in therapeutic treatment [
4,
25,
27,
28]. In addition, the combination of CUR with a biocompatible matrix, such as CS, enables the production of materials with unique and biologically interesting properties.
This work, aimed at developing pH-responsive CS-based beads via a simple, by-product-free dropping method, while also studying the effect of the crosslinking agent on CS-based particles, intends to at provide the proper insights for improving the bioavailability and controlled release of the active ingredient, CUR, in CS-based systems. This work also provides a promising avenue to construct highly biocompatible and biodegradable CS-based macrobeads for use in various practical applications.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Chitosan (CS, powder with molecular weight (MW): 200 g mol-1 and deacetylated degree ≥ 90%) and sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP, MW: 367.86 gmol-1, > 95%) were purchased by Glentham LIFE SCIENCES. Sodium hydroxide, pellets, reagent grade, Sharlau basic (MW: 40 g mol-1, ≥ 97%) was also used.
Curcumin (CUR, powder with MW: 368.38 g mol-1) was obtained from labfor. Ethanol (EtOH, MW: 46.07 g mol-1, ≥ 97%) and Methanol (MW: 32.04 g mol-1, ≥ 99.9%) were purchased from Honeywell Research Chemicals; acetic acid glacial (MW: 60.05 g mol-1, ≥ 99.8%) and acetonitrile (MW: 41.053 g mol-1, ≥ 99.9%) from Carlo Erba reagents. Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) was also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich ACS reagent, and Phosphate Buffer (PBS, pH 7.2 at 25°C) from Sigma-Aldrich. Double deionized water (conductivity: < 0.1 μS cm-1) was employed. All reagents were used without further purification.
2.2. Preparation of the CS- and CS- CUR- based macrobeads
Three different cross-linking media were used to gel the unloaded, CUR-loaded CS-based macroparticles: (a) 4 wt% NaOH in EtOH (26% v/v) solution (250 mL); (b) 2 wt% TPP and (c) 5 wt% TPP in aqueous solutions (250 mL).
In particular, 0.5 g of chitosan (CS) was gradually dissolved in 50 mL of an acetic acid solution (2%, v/v) under magnetic stirring for 3h at room temperature (rt). Then, the CS solution was dropped with a peristaltic pump (0.1 mL/min) into (a), (b), and (c) solutions under magnetic stirring (550 rpm). The obtained samples are denoted as CS-Na, CS-TPP2 and CS-TPP5, respectively, and shown in
Table 1.
To prepare CS-based macroparticles with CUR, 0.5 g CS was dissolved in 50 mL of an acetic acid solution (2%, v/v) under magnetic stirring for 3h (rt). 0.1 g of CUR was completely dissolved in 25 mL of a mixture of acetonitrile:methanol (1:1 v/v), filtered and stored in the dark. Then, the CUR mixture was dropped into the CS solution and kept under magnetic stirring (550 rpm) for 30 minutes. The preparation procedure of the CUR-loaded CS-based macrospheres is similar to that of the unloaded samples described previously and shown in
Figure 1. In more detail, the CS-based particles, loaded with CUR, prepared by precipitation in (a), (b), and (c) solutions, are CS-Na-CUR, CS-TPP2-CUR and CS-TPP5-CUR, respectively. All sample codes and their compositions are given in
Table 1. After the cross-linking procedure, the macrobeads were sonicated for 1 h (rt), filtered and washed with double-distelled water to neutral pH. Finally, they stored at 4°C.
2.3. Characterization of the CS- and CS- CUR macrobeads
The prepared macroparticles were observed with an ECLIPSE Si Upright light Microscope (Nikon, type 104c), and analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM; FEI Quanta 450 equipment). The samples were completely dried (rt) and covered with a carbon coating to ensure good conductivity of the electron beam; then, photographs were taken with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. The average diameter of the macroparticles was estimated by collecting more than 200 images in different areas of the samples.
FTIR spectra were obtained with a Perkin Elmer spectrometer, Spectrum Two model. Spectra were previously collected by mixing a small amount of macroparticles with KBr and compressing them to form tablets. IR spectra were obtained in absorbance mode in the spectral region 4000-450 cm-1 with a resolution of 4 cm-1.
Thermogravimetric studies were performed from 150 to 800 °C at 10 °C/min under argon on a TAQ500 instrument (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA).
An SDT-Q 600 calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) was used for DSC characterization. DSC curves were obtained using aluminum crucibles containing about 5 mg of samples under a nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate: 50 mL min-1) from 50 to 400 °C at 10 °C/min. An empty aluminum crucible was used as a reference. The DSC cell was calibrated with indium (mp 156.6 °C; ΔHfusion = 28.54 J g-1) and zinc (mp 419.6 °C).
CUR encapsulation efficiency was measured by total dissolution of 50 g of macroparticles in 100 ml of HCl solution (0.1 mol L
-1). After filtration, the concentration of encapsulated CUR was determined on a Shimadzu UV-Vis spectrophotometer (model UV-2401 PC), set at 429 nm. A standard sample of CUR dissolved in a solution co of acetonitrile/methanol (1:1 v/v) was used to obtain the following calibration equation:
with R
2; = 0.9942, and where x is the CUR concentration (g L
-1) and y is the absorbance at 429 nm. Encapsulation efficiency was expressed as the percentage of encapsulated CUR relative to its total amount loaded into the CUR solution before the gelling step. Loading efficiency tests were assayed in triplicate for each sample.
CUR release kinetics were studied by suspending 50 g of macroparticles in 100 ml of PBS at pH 7.2 and 25 °C. At predetermined time intervals, 3 mL of sample was withdrawn to determine the quantity of dye released, and an equivalent amount of fresh dissolution medium was used to replace that removed. The samples were analyzed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry, as previously discussed. All experiments were performed in triplicate and the results were expressed as cumulative CUR release.
The swelling properties of the macroparticles were studied as gravimetrically measured water uptake by treating the macroparticles in doubly deionized water (pH 7) under gentle stirring for 120 min. The swollen samples were removed periodically (0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min), and their net weight was determined by weighing them, after previously removing the adsorbed water on the surface by blotting them with filter paper. Each swelling experiment was repeated twice, and the average value was taken as the swelling degree, calculated by the following formula:
where M
t is the weight of the swollen sample at time t, and M
0 is the initial weight of the sample before immersion in double-distilled water.
5. Conclusions
In the present work, spherical chitosan (CS)-based particles were synthesized by ionic gelation using due different cross-linking agents, NaOH and tripolyphosphate (TPP). The latter was employed at 2 wt% and 5 wt%, while NaOH 4 wt%. Under the same conditions, CS-based particles were loaded with curcumin (CUR). The obtaining macrobeads, namely CS-Na, CS-TPP2, CS-TPP5, CS-Na-CUR, CS-TPP2-CUR, and CS-TPP5-CUR, were characterized by SEM, FTIR, and TGA and DSC analyses. SEM confirmed the spherical morphology of the macroparticles, with a rough outer surface and a smooth inner cavity. The TGA and DSC analyses showed a slight decrease in the thermal stability of TPP-crosslinked samples compared with those cross-linked with NaOH. This effect is, influenced by the amount of TPP used. In particular, TGA analysis confirmed the encapsulation of CUR in the CS-based particles, showing a lowering of T
g, from 137.9 °C in CS-Na-CUR to 124.6 °C in CS-TPP2-CUR, and 125.2 °C in CS-TPP5-CUR. The DSC analysis further confirmed that CUR is trapped between the CS chains, acting as an additional spacer of the CS chains and facilitating their further mobility [
36].
Ultimately, the encapsulation efficiency of CUR was more than 92 wt%. However, the NaOH cross-linked particles allow CUR to be released very quickly; while the TPP crosslinked samples released 34 wt% of the charged CUR within minutes, allowing the remaining 66 wt% to be released as a result of CS biodegradation.
Regarding the swelling behavior, CS-Na-CUR was unable to maintain its weight in water, showing rapid degradation, the samples obtained with TPP instead exhibited higher swelling ability, which decreased with increasing TPP concentration. These results suggest that a more tightly cross-linked CS matrix does not swell as much as a poorly cross-linked CS matrix, also reflecting drug release. In fact, higher swelling capacity means that water penetrates better within the polymer matrix and, as a plasticizer, converts the glassy polymer to a more rubbery form and, consequently, leads to better drug release from the particle structure [
42].
The results indicate that the correct choice of gelling agent and its concentration leads to spherical particles capable of encapsulating CUR and releasing it in a wide spectrum of kinetics to be adopted according to specific applications.