3. Results
There were 135 identified encounters of
Acinetobacter spp. bacteraemia, of which 37 met inclusion criteria for community-acquired
Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia. One case of
Acinetobacter haemolyticus pneumonia was excluded and a further nine cases were unavailable. Twenty-eight cases were available for final inclusion (
Figure 1). The overall mortality was 28.6% (8/28). Greater mortality was seen in patients who did not receive targeted antibiotic therapy from day one (45.5%), compared with those who received gentamicin or carbapenem on day one (17.6%).
The mean age of patients presenting with CAAP was 43 (36.8-51.3) (
Table 1). Patients were more likely to be male (67.9%), Indigenous Australians (82.1%), and to present in the Wet Season (64.3%).
Clinically, patients presented with sputum production (47.8%), pleuritic chest pain (64.3%), and were observed to be pyrexical (57.1%) and hypoxaemic (71.4%). 89.3% of patients had moderate or severe pneumonia (SMART-COP) and often required admission to ICU (57.1%).
Biochemical abnormalities included neutrophilia (57.1%) and elevated C-reactive protein (95.5%) (
Table 2). The median time to blood culture positivity for
Acinetobacter baumannii was 10.7 hours. Radiographically, 9 (32.1%) patients had disease limited to the left hemithorax, 12 (42.9%) had disease limited to the right hemithorax, and 6 (21.4%) had bilateral infiltrates. In total, 16 (57.1%) had multi-lobar disease. Pleural effusions were uncommon, 7/28 (25%). No pleural aspirates were performed.
Current tobacco use and hazardous ethanol consumption were the risk factors most frequently associated with CAAP (
Table 1). Tobacco smoking was not associated with increased mortality (
Table 3). 89.3% of individuals had two or more recognized risk factors for disease. Disease severity was not associated with the presence of multiple risk factors, nor the length of hospital stay. Non-targeted antibiotics for the treatment of CAAP on day one were found to confer the greatest risk for mortality amongst CAAP patients (50%) (
Table 3). While a greater proportion of patients with mild-to-moderate CAAP on presentation died (4/10) than those with severe CAAP (4/18), there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups (χ
2 = 0.742, df = 1, p = 0.320).
There was no statistically significant difference between the season of presentation (wet vs dry) and effect on presenting severity, (
Table 1) (F = 0.395, df = 26, p = 0.535) or mortality (χ
2 = 0.16, df = 1, p = 0.901). Although there were more presentations to ICU during wet season, 10/16 (62.5%), this did not reach statistical significance (χ
2 = 0.052, df = 1, p = 0.820). Of three patients who died from fulminant sepsis within 24 hours, one occurred in the dry season and two occurred in the wet season. An equal number of patients received gentamicin on day one in both wet and dry season respectively, and 5 cases received meropenem on day one in both wet and dry seasons.
A greater proportion of patients received CAAP targeted antibiotic therapy on day one if they had severe SMART-COP score, (z = 1.854, df =26, p =0.064). There was no significant difference between day 1 antibiotic choice and requirement for ICU (χ
2 = 3.194, df = 26, p = 0.535). Additionally, there was a non-statistically significant difference in day 1 targeted antibiotic choice and mortality, (χ
2 = 2.530, df = 1, p = 0.200). 45.5% (5/11) of patients who did not receive targeted antibiotics died, whereas only 17.6% (3/17) receiving targeted antibiotics on day 1 died. Of total deaths, 50% (4/8) did not receive gentamicin or meropenem on day 1 (
Table 4).
4. Discussion
The demographics of our cohort mirror previous Australian studies with an over-representation of Indigenous Australians, males, and the middle aged [
1,
7]. The laboratory investigations represented in
Table 2 are consistent with infection, and are not discriminatory alone for the diagnosis of CAAP. Most patients had multi-lobar infection, and no tendency to a single hemithorax.
Hazardous alcohol intake and current smoking status were the most common risk factors. Although supported by other Australian studies [
1,
7], this contrasts with studies from South East Asia where excess alcohol consumption is less common [
6,
8,
18,
24]. Cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic renal failure (CRF) were underrepresented in distinction to other studies [
1,
6,
8,
10,
19,
20]. As few patients had pre-morbid renal function, or assessment for DM it is possible these comorbidities are under reported. Our cohort had similar presenting severity to a large Australian cohort from Darwin with median SMART-COP scores of 6.0 and 5.5 respectively [
7]. Despite similar severity, we had fewer ICU admissions (57% vs 80%) [
7].
An earlier pilot study during the wet season in tropical Australia demonstrated throat carriage of
Acinetobacter in 10% of residents consuming excessive alcohol [
18]. Ethanol impairs host immunity by adversely affecting phagocytosis, intracellular killing, cytokine production, antigen presentation, and B-cell function [
2,
25]. Additionally, ethanol may hinder surfactant production, reducing anti-bacterial activity [
25]. Secondly, ethanol may promote micro-aspiration of colonised pharyngeal bacteria leading to nascent pulmonary infection [
16]. We propose that ethanol may contribute to; upper airway colonisation with
Acinetobacter, risk of aspiration, and impaired immune response to infection.
A recent study from the Northern Territory has shown community-acquired strains of
A.baumannii harbour fewer virulence factors than nosocomial strains [
26]. Additionally, no correlation was seen between strains harbouring more virulence factors and disease severity, ICU admission or mortality [
26]. Therefore, host factors such as alcohol and tobacco consumption are likely more important in promoting disease transmission and impairing host response to infection [
2,
26,
27]. Alcohol intoxication in itself may influence bacterial gene expression [
26], and promote growth of
Acinetobacter [
2]
, adding to the complex interplay between host and bacterial factors affecting virulence.
It is important to recognise the role of risk factors in disease acquisition, host response and clinical outcomes, although they have less discriminatory value in distinguishing CAAP from other causes of severe pneumonia or gram-negative sepsis. A consideration, given that Australian antibiotic guidelines lean on risk factor identification for the purpose of rationalising antibiotic therapy.
Community-acquired
Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia, is considered a tropical or sub-tropical wet season disease [
2,
7,
21,
27,
28,
29,
30]. We observed over one third of patients presenting with CAAP in the dry season. This observation is supported by a case control series in Japan, which found no difference in season in respect to the number of CAAP presentations [
22]. Other case series have reported a wet season ‘peak’ but, found no significant difference between season [
9], or acknowledged there were reasonable case numbers in the dry season [
1,
8]. Prior studies suggest the seasonal predominance is due to promotion of bacterial growth in warm, humid environments [
27,
28,
30], although this does not explain the mechanism leading to initial nasopharyngeal colonisation. Presumably, and similar to
Burkholderia pseudomallei [
31,
32,
33],
Acinetobacter is liberated from soil in aerosols during severe wet weather. We therefore propose that the initial nasopharyngeal colonisation may occur during the wet season, although subsequent infection may occur later with aspiration [
2,
16], or during a relative immunocompromised state.
We found no significant difference in disease severity at presentation as defined by SMART-COP score between wet and dry season disease (p = 0.535). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in ICU presentations between wet and dry seasons (p = 0.82). This is an important consideration, as a determinant for considering empiric treatment of CAAP is if it occurs during the wet season [
12,
13,
14]. In the authors’ experience, CAAP is not typically considered, nor is it deliberately treated empirically in the drier months. Surprisingly, there was an equal proportion of gentamicin and meropenem use on day one in both dry and wet season disease. This potentially reflects coverage for severe CAP or gram-negative sepsis, rather than empirical treatment for suspected CAAP.
We suggest that the relatively improved mortality rate of 28.6% in our cohort, compared to previous studies [
1,
2,
9,
18,
19], is a reflection of a higher proportion of moderate-to-severe CAP treated with targeted antibiotics for CAAP. If subjects were given gentamicin or meropenem on day one, they were less likely to die (17.6%) compared to those who did not receive targeted antibiotics on day 1 (44.4%). This is despite lower acuity illness, as measured by median SMART-COP score in those who did not receive targeted antibiotic therapy (4 vs 7). Although this rate did not reach statistical significance, the trend may be clinically significant. Furthermore, presenting severity of CAAP did not influence mortality (p = 0.320). Our mortality rate of 28.6% exceeded that of the Darwin cohort at 11% [
7]. However, all patients in the Darwin cohort received timely antibiotics targeted to CAAP [
7], compared to 61% of patients in our cohort. Evaluating patients who received targeted antibiotics on Day 1, only 3 died (17.6%) with a much-improved mortality rate. Furthermore, 2 of these 3 patients died within hours of arrival. This more likely reflects decompensated sepsis than failure of antibiotic therapy per se. This highlights the importance of timely targeted antibiotic therapy in mitigating mortality associated with CAAP including in initially mild to moderate illness, and further supports the conclusions drawn from the Darwin study that mortality rates can be significantly improved with gentamicin or carbapenems [
7].
We compared outcomes between the two frontline antibiotics, meropenem and gentamicin to determine efficiency and patient outcomes. Unfortunately, we had insufficient data to make definitive statistical conclusions.
Table 4 compares the patient groups who received either gentamicin or meropenem upfront, or who received it later in the course of disease, presumably either due to deterioration in disease severity or following identification of
Acinetobacter baumannii on culture. Mortality, hospital length of stay, and disease severity on presentation are similar between both meropenem on day one and gentamicin on day one. The higher proportion of patients who received meropenem that required ICU (8/10 meropenem, 2/4 gentamicin) may reflect the prescribing practices amongst ICU clinicians or difference in disease severity.
Furthermore, there was greater mortality with delayed access to meropenem compared with a delay to gentamicin (3/5 vs 0/3). Limited data may diminish the strength of our conclusions, but importantly, a single dose of administered gentamicin may provide efficacy whilst awaiting confirmatory culture. This finding supports recent revisions of the
Therapeutic Guidelines, which suggest an initial single dose gentamicin as part of ‘triple therapy’ for moderate disease where CAAP is suspected [
12].
4.1. Limitations
Given the retrospective nature of this study, some data was limited, including data for SMART-COP scores where blood gas analysis was unavailable for some patients. This may have underestimated disease severity. It was presumed the presenting severity guided antibiotic decision making on day one. Although this does not appreciate the rapidity with which patients may deteriorate. This may explain some discordance with antibiotic choice, patient outcomes, and the defined severity of illness. Strict definitions on hazardous ethanol intake could not be adhered to and were reliant on clinician discretion and documentation. We defined cases of community-acquired disease to be free of hospital presentation within the preceding 72 hours. Given the retrospective nature of cases, there may be instances of community-onset disease that is not strictly community-acquired. However, antibiotic susceptibility profiling of cases suggests that all cases were community-acquired. Cases excluded due to the inaccessibility of patient records were over-represented by peripheral hospitals, possibly contributing to selection bias. Furthermore, as this is a single centre study, overall results may be less generalisable. Although we believe this still adds to the growing literature on CAAP given previous Australian studies have been limited to a single centre in the Northern Territory of Australia.
5. Conclusions
We report retrospectively on twenty-eight cases of community-acquired bacteraemic Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia from North Queensland. Risk factors identified are similar to prior Australian studies, with middle age, male, and Indigenous Australians over-represented. The most commonly reported modifiable risk factors included hazardous alcohol intake, and current smoking, with 89% having two or more risk factors. First line antibiotics for A.baumannii are gentamicin or carbapenems. We propose that risk factors confer the greatest likelihood of sepsis arising from CAAP, and therefore irrespective of initial severity early use of first line antibiotic therapy can reduce mortality. We advocate for the use of targeted antibiotics in suspected cases of CAAP where clinical suspicion should be one based on risk factors, disease severity and clinical acumen, irrespective of season at presentation. Unfortunately, these risk factors are not unique for CAAP and thus do not discriminate from other infectious aetiologies.
The authors agree with current antibiotic guidelines for wet season CAP in tropical Australia. Although our study consists of relatively few numbers, we have demonstrated dry season CAAP in a third of overall cases. Supported by the data from our cohort, we would contend the use of single dose gentamicin be considered in future guidelines for empirical cover of dry season CAAP in suspected cases whilst awaiting culture confirmation. Single dose gentamicin may also be considered in cases of mild pneumonia where the patient later deteriorates. Particularly as the time to blood culture positivity in most instances is brief. In our experience, single dose gentamicin is safe to prescribe even in renal impairment or sepsis. This change in clinic practice may help improve mortality in dry-season disease. Furthermore, it may help diminish the over-reliance on carbapenems, and the development of subsequent antibiotic resistance this entails. Overall, mortality rates remain poor even in well-managed cases and thus ongoing vigilance by clinical caregivers in Australia is paramount.