1. Introduction
Transition-metal complexes with redox-active ligands have been intensively studied over the past few decades due to their unique properties and intriguing chemical behavior [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8]. They wildly applied in various fields of coordination chemistry including catalysis, organic synthesis and material science [
1,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18]. Recent attempts in controlling catalytic processes employing redox non-innocent ligands are mostly inspired by the metal-radical motifs in active sites of many metalloenzymes [
5], such as galactose oxidase, which contains one copper ion and oxidizes a primary alcohol to the aldehyde in the presence of dioxygen [
19,
20]. The formation of a Cu(II)−phenoxyl radical species was proposed to be the key step in this transformation [
21].
Indeed, electron-rich sterically hindered phenolates are among the most common non-innocent ligands that can assist in catalytic transformations by storing (in form of phenoxyl) and delivering charge during catalytic transformations [
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27]. However, bidentate ligand scaffold utilized in many catalytic reactions involving such phenolate ligands (or their aminophenol derivatives) often leads to unfavorable isomerization processes of the ligand field, precluding further transformations of a substrate [
28,
29]. In order to overcome the limitation the redox-active phenolates were merged with N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs), forming a pincer-type tridentate ligands [
30,
31]. NHCs are well-known as a powerful class of ligands in organometallic chemistry and homogeneous catalysis due to their unique steric and electronic properties. Moreover, the strongly σ-donating carbene makes the ligand less labile in its oxidized forms, while the strong
trans effect provide hemilability of the auxiliary ligand, generating a vacant coordination site at the metal center which is a prerequisite for effective coordination and transformation of substrate molecules in the homogeneous catalysis conditions [
32,
33,
34]. In this regard, the previously reported diphenolate imidazolyl and benzimidazolyl carbenes appeared promising for constructing transition metal complexes with the coordinated pro-radical ligand [
35,
36,
37,
38]. The oxidation of the above-mentioned species allowed to form an electronic structure in which a delocalized electronic hole is more likely located on the ligand. However, the precise determination of the metal oxidation state in transition-metal complexes is not always possible. In reality, metal ion and ligand are both affected by the oxidation and the resulting spin density is shared over both, allowing a multi-configurational state [
9,
25]. Therefore, a careful examination of metal complexes by various spectroscopic methods combined with computational studies is required for the better description of their electronic structure, which is essential for the design of catalytic cycles with participation of redox non-innocent ligands [
39,
40].
Over the last years, our research group has focused on the design, synthesis and catalytic application of pincer-type ligands and their complexes of group 10 metals [
41,
42,
43,
44,
45,
46,
47]. The intrinsic diamagnetism of this metal ions in d
8 configuration allows for fine assignment of the electronic structure of the oxidized species. At the same time, the natural content of spin-1/2 isotope for platinum (
195Pt, 33.775 %) gives the opportunity for careful examination of the electronic structure by EPR spectroscopy. Thus, herein we report on the synthesis of Pt(II) complex bearing tridentate diphenolate NHC ligand. The chemical and electrochemical generation and isolation of one-electron-oxidized species are also performed. Characterization of their electronic structures by combined UV-Vis/NIR- and EPR-spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and DFT studies suggests the redox non-innocence of the ligand. The obtained results allowed to design an electrocatalytic process for 2-(methylamino)ethanol oxidation with participation of Pt(II)-phenoxyl radical complex.
2. Results and Discussion
The diphenolate NHC precursor
LH3Cl was prepared according to our previous report [
48]. The synthesis of its platinum complex was performed using modified procedure suggested by Mauro, Dagorne, Bellemin-Laponnaz and co-authors for the related diphenolate imidazolyl and benzimidazolyl carbene complexes [
30]. However, it should be noted, that in our case providing the synthesis at 100 °C (as reported by the authors) lead unfavorable deposition of black precipitate (more likely metallic platinum). Therefore, the tetrahydropyrimidin-1-ium based pro-ligand was treated with Pt(COD)Cl
2 and an excess of potassium carbonate in pyridine at 50 °C for 20 h (
Scheme 1). The isolation of the complex by a filtration of the CH
2Cl
2 solution of crude material through a silica gel plug with further evaporation of the solvent afforded the platinum complex
Pt(L)Py in 81% yield as an orange solid. The formation of the corresponding diphenolate NHC complex was confirmed by the presence of a carbene signal at δ
C 159.2 ppm in the
13C{
1H} NMR spectrum, while
1H NMR spectroscopy confirmed the absence of any residual tetrahydropyrimidinium and phenol moieties. The proposed formulation was also confirmed by MALDI mass spectrometry and elemental analysis.
The UV-Vis spectrum of
Pt(L)Py in CH
2Cl
2 (
Figure 1) shows a weak absorption band at
ca. 350 nm (ε = 6000 M
–1⋅cm
–1). According to time-dependent DFT calculations (
Figure S4 and
Table S1), the observed absorption originates from the electronic transition composed of a phenolate-to-NHC intraligand excitation mixed with a metal-to-metal transition (HOMO → LUMO+2). In should also be noted that no NIR transitions were observed for
Pt(L)Py complex (see
Supplementary Materials for details).
The electrochemical properties of
Pt(L)Py were investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) in CH
2Cl
2 containing 0.1 M tetra-
n-butylammonium tetrafluoroborate as supporting electrolyte. CV curve of complex
Pt(L)Py exhibits two reversible oxidation peaks at E
1/21 = 0.25 V and E
1/22 = 0.80 V vs the ferrocenium/ferrocene external standard (
Figure 2). The number of electrons involved was confirmed by the analysis of the shape of the DPV curve. Thus, the values of 1.060 and 1.004 were obtained for the first and second oxidation, respectively. The two oxidation waves can be attributed to ligand-based oxidation processes leading to a mono- and presumably a bis-phenoxyl radical species [
49,
50]. No reduction peak observed when scanning towards the cathodic values of potentials in CH
2Cl
2. It is interesting to note, that the reversibility of the second oxidation peak disappears when polar coordinating solvent is used (DMF, CH
3CN). At the same time, DMF enabled determination of the electroreduction process for the complex at –2.80 V, which was ascribed to the Pt
II → Pt
0 conversion (see
Supplementary Materials for details).
The relatively large separation between the halfwave potentials for both processes (ΔE
1/2 = 0.55 V) indicates that oxidation of one phenolate moiety in the complex has a significant influence on the second one. Thus, in order to evaluate the nature of the species formed in the electrooxidation process, the “chemical” oxidation of
Pt(L)Py with AgBF
4 as oxidizing agent (E
1/2 = 0.65 V vs Fc
+/Fc [
51]) in dry CH
2Cl
2 at room temperature under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen was performed (
Scheme 2). A color change of the solution from orange to dark green, as well as the precipitation of Ag
0 at the bottom of the flask verified the successful oxidation of
Pt(L)Py. The product
[Pt(L)Py][BF4] was isolated in 77 % yield as an air-stable dark green solid. The proposed composition was confirmed by MALDI mass spectrometry by the characteristic ions with
m/z 792.4 (positive mode) and
m/z 87.1 (negative mode) corresponding to the [Pt(L)Py]
+ and [BF
4]ˉ species respectively. The elemental analysis is also in agreement with the expected product.
X-ray-quality dark green needle-like crystals were grown by diffusion of pentane into a saturated solution of the product in dichloromethane at ca. 0 °C, and X-ray diffraction studies allowed the structure determination of
[Pt(L)Py][BF4]. The complex crystallizes as CH
2Cl
2 adduct in the
(2) triclinic space group, with two molecules per unit cell. As depicted in
Figure 3, a distorted-square-planar environment around the metal is observed. Thus, the pyridine ligand occupies the coordination site
trans to the pincer carbene carbon, while two oxygen atoms complete the metal coordination sphere standing
trans to each other. The Pt−C
carbene distance (1.954(2) Å) lies within the range of related structures [
30,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56]. The {OCO}Pt chelate in the complex is significantly distorted from planarity (O(1)−N(1)−N(2)−O(2) = –14.63(8)°). The Pt−N bond length (2.094(2) Å) is consistent with a
trans influence of the carbene ligand (see ref [
57] for example of [Pt(Py)
4]
2+ complex, where the average Pt–N bond length is 2.024 Å). Selected bond distances and angles are listed in the figure description.
An EPR analysis of a solution of
[Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH
2Cl
2 at 298 K shows a signal at g = 2.070 with signal coupling coming from the
195Pt having nuclear spin of
1/
2 and natural content of 33.775%. (
Figure 4a). The g value is significantly larger than that expected for free phenoxyl radicals (typically 2.005) [
58], but smaller than the average g values usually reported for paramagnetic platinum complexes. Variable-temperature EPR study (
Figure 4b) revealed the g-anisotropy. Thus, the frozen solution EPR spectrum of
[Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH
2Cl
2 displays a highly anisotropic S = ½ signal at g
1 = 1.943, g
2 = 2.123, and g
3 ≈ 2.149 (g
iso ≈ 2.071), that together with large g value suggests a considerable contribution of the metal d orbital to the SOMO [
12,
59]. Taken together, these data provide strong evidence that the distribution of the unpaired electron in
[Pt(L)Py][BF4] is not uniform, supporting the assumption that the radical is at least partially localized over the ligand.
The Mulliken spin-density distribution in
[Pt(L)Py]+ calculated at the DFT-optimized structure (
Figure 5) exhibits a predominant phenoxyl-radical character. Although the spin density is shared between the metal center and the ligand, its major contribution is delocalized within the ligand. It should also be noted that the nitrogen atoms of the carbene linker hold a small spin population, in contrast to the diphenolate imidazolyl based nickel analogue, which does not feature any significant spin density [
35].
The UV-Vis and NIR spectra of
[Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH
2Cl
2 are shown in
Figure 6. In visible region the complex exhibits an absorption band at
ca. 466 nm, which is red-shifted compared to its neutral analogue. In addition,
[Pt(L)Py][BF4] shows a remarkable intense NIR band at 1242 nm (ε = 7500 M
–1⋅cm
–1) with a narrow bandwidth at half height Δ
ν 1/2 of 1712 cm
-1 (see
Supplementary Materials for details).
According to the Marcus–Hush relationship:
and using the
ν max = 8050 cm
-1 (1242 nm) the minimum bandwidth predicted in the high temperature limit (HTL) is 4308 cm
-1, which differs significantly from the experimental value. This observation is consistent with the inability of Marcus–Hush theory to predict IVCT band shape at the class II/III borderline [
59]. Moreover, a sharp and intense NIR transition, where Δ
ν 1/2 ≤ 2000 cm
−1, ε ≥ 5000 M
−1 cm
−1, is an indicator that the electron hole is fully delocalized over the ligand scaffold [
60]. Thus, on the basis of the high intensity and narrow bandwidth, the lowest energy band can be assigned to the intraligand HOMO (donor) to SOMO (radical) electronic transition. In order to validate this hypothesis, absorption properties of
[Pt(L)Py]+ were studied with time-dependent DFT (
Figure S4 and
Table S1). The calculated energy of the NIR band with a large oscillator strength is 1162 nm (
fosc = 0.23), which matches well with the experimental data (1242 nm). The principal excitation is indeed the
β-HOMO →
β-LUMO transition (97%), which is predominately π-π* intraligand in nature. The calculated electronic transition of a higher energy (λ
calc = 429 nm) corresponds to the experimental band observed at 466 nm. The principal excitations that contribute to the band are
α-HOMO →
α-LUMO (58%) and
α-HOMO →
α-LUMO+1 (32%) transitions.
Having all this results in hand, we decided to test the platinum complex
Pt(L)Py as a mediator in the process of electrocatalytic oxidation of amines. It is well known, that the electrochemical oxidation of amines is an important alternative to conventional chemical approaches, providing critical pathways for the synthesis and modification of a wide range of chemically valuable compounds, including pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals [
61]. Details on the mechanistic aspects of the electrochemical oxidation of aliphatic amines can be found elsewhere [
61]. However, the direct electrooxidation processes often lead to a passivation of the working electrode surface by the formation of a polymer film, which can sharply decrease current efficiency [
62]. Indirect electrooxidation using an electron transfer mediator is an effective technique to avoid this problem [
63]. Besides the minimization of the electrode surface fouling effect, the application of redox mediators allows to decrease the overpotential needed for the direct oxidation of amines [
61].
Pt(L)Py, which is prone to electrochemical oxidation to
[Pt(L)Py]+, meets the requirements usually addressed to a redox mediator (or catalyst): it has a reversible redox couple, while both the oxidized and reduced forms are relatively stable in the solution. Thus, 2-(methylamino)ethanol (MEA) was chosen as a model substrate for the catalytic tests.
Figure 7 shows the CV curves, obtained for 1 mM solution of
Pt(L)Py with different concentrations of MEA (0.00 M, 0.12 M and 0.24M) in the range of 0.00 to 0.45 V vs Fc
+/Fc in CH
2Cl
2 in the presence of
n-Bu
4NBF
4 (0.1 M). It should be noted, that MEA is electrochemically inactive in this region (see black curve in
Figure 7). Reaching a concentration of MEA up to 0.12 M (see blue curve in
Figure 7) leads to a disappearance of reversibility of
[Pt(L)Py]+/Pt(L)Py couple with simultaneous increase in oxidation peak current. The peak oxidation current continues to increase until the substrate concentration reaches 0.24 M. At MEA concentrations greater than 0.24 M, saturation behavior is observed as the current becomes independent of the concentration of MEA. The efficiency of electrocatalytic MEA oxidation can be estimated via the ratio of the maximum catalytic current (
icat) to the peak current (
ip) in the presence and absence of amine, respectively. Thus, the
icat/
ip value of 1.9 was obtained for
Pt(L)Py as a mediator of this process.
These results are indicative of the electrochemical catalysis of secondary amine (MEA) oxidation via the active Pt(II)-phenoxyl radical complex oxidant. Further experiments related to reactivity and catalytic activity of platinum complexes [Pt(L)Py]+ and Pt(L)Py as well as other group 10 metals with diphenolate NHC ligand L are currently under progress.
3. Materials and Methods
General Considerations
All reactions were performed using standard Schlenk procedures under a dry nitrogen atmosphere. Organic solvents (pentane, CH
2Cl
2, pyridine, DMF, CH
3CN, THF) were purified and degassed by standard procedures. CDCl
3 was degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles and kept over 3Å molecular sieves before use. Ligand
LH3Cl was obtained by the previously described procedure [
48]. All other reagents (AgBF
4 (Aldrich, 98%),
n-Bu
4NBF
4 (Acros Organics, 98%), ferrocene (Alfa Aesar, 99%), Pt(COD)Cl
2 (Sigma-Aldrich, 99%)) were used without further purification.
NMR spectra were recorded on a high-resolution BRUKER AVANCE-400 (Germany—Switzerland) spectrometer at frequencies of 400.17 MHz (1H) and 100.62 MHz (13С). 1H and 13C{1H} chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) downfield of tetramethylsilane and were calibrated against the residual resonance of the deuterated solvent. UV–Vis spectra were recorded on SPECORD 50 PLUS Analytik Jena (Spain) spectrophotometer in 10 mm closed quartz cuvette at 298 K. NIR absorption spectra were recorded by a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer (Germany) in 10 mm closed quartz cuvette at 298 K. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were performed with a Bruker Elexsys E-500 spectrometer utilizing a 100-kHz field modulation and X-band microwaves (Germany). MALDI-TOF experiments were performed using an Ultraflex III TOF/TOF (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) mass spectrometer equipped with a Nd:YAG laser. The spectra were measured in both positive and negative ion linear modes. para-Nitroaniline (PNA) was used as a matrix. The FlexControl software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Version 3.0) was used for instrument control and data acquiring. Data processing was performed by FlexAnalysis software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Version 3.0). Elemental analysis was performed on a high-temperature Elementar vario MACRO cube (Germany) analyzer.
X-ray Structure Determination
X-ray crystallography data. X-ray diffraction analysis of the structure
[Pt(L)Py][BF4] was performed on a Bruker D8 QUEST (Germany) automatic three-circle diffractometer with a PHOTON III two-dimensional detector and an IμS DIAMOND microfocus X-ray tube (λ [Mo Kα] = 0.71073 Å) at cooling conditions. Data collection and processing of diffraction data were performed using the APEX3 software package. The structure was solved by the direct method using the SHELXT program [
64] and refined by the full-matrix least squares method over F
2 using the SHELXL program [
65]. All the calculations were performed in the WinGX software package [
66], the calculation of the geometry of the molecule and the intermolecular interactions in the crystal was carried out using the PLATON program [
67] and the drawings of the molecules were performed using the ORTEP−3 [
66] and MERCURY [
68] programs. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined in the anisotropic approximation. The hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and included in the refinement in the “riding” model. One of the solvate molecules of methylene chloride is disordered by the center of symmetry over two positions. The crystallographic data of structure were deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center and the registration number and the most important characteristics are given in
Table 1.
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV)
In CV and DPV experiments the concentration of the complex was 5∙mM in CH2Cl2 as a solvent with (n-Bu4N)BF4 (0.1 M) as a supporting electrolyte. The volume of the working solution was 5 mL. All experiments were performed under an inert nitrogen atmosphere in a three-channel electrochemical cell equipped with a working electrode, an auxiliary electrode, and a reference electrode. A glassy carbon (GC) electrode (working surface 3.14 mm2) served as a working electrode. A Pt wire with the diameter of 1 mm was used as an auxiliary electrode. Ag/AgNO3 (0.01 M solution in CH3CN) was used as a reference electrode (Е0(Fc+/Fc) = +0.20 V). Values were recalculated vs the ferrocenium/ferrocene external standard. The GC electrode was polished with 0.05 µm aluminium oxide polishing paper, and the electrode surface was cleaned before each experiment. Curves were recorded at a constant potential scan rate of 100 mV∙s–1 using a Е2Р potentiostat from BASi Epsilon (USA). The device comprises a measuring unit and a PC DellOptiplex 320 with the Epsilon-EC-USB-V200 software.
Experimental Procedures and Product Characterization
Synthesis of Pt(L)Py.
A mixture of 1,3-bis(3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)-5,5-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-1-ium chlorideLH3Cl (100 mg, 0.179 mmol), Pt(COD)Cl2 (85 mg, 0.227 mmol), and potassium carbonate (30 equiv, 744 mg, 5.4 mmol) was suspended in pyridine in a Schlenk flask. The mixture was sonicated for 50 min and stirred at 50 °C for 20 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting suspension was concentrated under reduced pressure and then dissolved in dichloromethane; this solution was filtered through a Celite plug and concentrated under reduced pressure, affording complex Pt(L)Py (115 mg, 81%, orange solid). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400.17 MHz, 300 K.): 1.12 (s, 18H, C(CH3)3), 1.27 (s, 6H, C(CH3)2), 1.30 (s, 18H, C(CH3)3), 3.73 (s, 4H, CH2), 6.92 (d, 4JHH = 2.4 Hz, 2H, CHPhenoxy), 7.01 (d, 4JHH = 2.4 Hz, 2H, CHPhenoxy), 7.41 (td, 3JHH = 6.3, 4JHH = 1.4 Hz, 2H, CHPy), 7.81 (tt, 3JHH = 7.7, 4JHH = 1.5 Hz, 1H, CHPy), 8.82 (dd, 3JHH = 4.8, 4JHH = 1.5 Hz, 2H, NCHPy). 13C{1H}NMR (100.62 MHz, CDCl3, 300 K) δ 24.72 (C(CH3)2), 28.40 (C(CH3)2), 29.76 (C(CH3)3), 31.69 (C(CH3)3), 34.30 (C(CH3)3), 35.29 (C(CH3)3), 58.41 (NCH2), 115.68 (CHAr), 119.52 (CHAr), 124.65 (CHPy), 136.15 (C–O), 138.01 (CPy), 138.16 (CAr), 151.67 (CHPy), 159.37 (CHcarbene). MALDI-TOF MS m/z: calcd for C39H55N3O2Pt [M]+ 792.97, found 792.4. Anal. Calcd (%) for C39H55N3O2Pt: C, 56.37; H, 6.51; N, 5.12. Found: C, 56.59; H, 7.78; N, 5.05.
Synthesis of [Pt(L)Py][BF4].
In a Schlenk flask, Pt(L)Py (33 mg, 0.041 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (7.5 mL). Afterwards, the solution of AgBF4 (7.4 mg, 0.037 mmol) in dichloromethane (7.5 mL) was added dropwise to Pt(L)Py and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. After the completion of the reaction, the solution was filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure, and washed three times with pentane (5 mL). Complex [Pt(L)Py][BF4] was isolated in 63% yield (20.5 mg) as a dark green solid. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were grown by diffusion of pentane into a saturated solution of the product in dichloromethane at 0 °C. MALDI-TOF MS m/z: calcd for C39H55BF4N3O2Pt [M]+ 792.97, found 792.4. Anal. Calcd (%) for C39H55BF4N3O2Pt: C, 50.63; H, 5.73; N, 4.83. Found: C, 50.19; H, 7.00; N, 4.98.
Quantum-chemical Calculations
Geometry optimizations were carried out using the PBE0/LANL2DZ computational procedure, which employs the PBE0 functional [
69] in conjunction with the LANL2DZ basis set and associated ECP [
70,
71,
72,
73] for Pt. Absorption spectra were calculated with time-dependent DFT using the B3LYP functional [
74,
75] and a larger basis set (def2-TZVP [
76,
77,
78]). All calculations were done with the ORCA package (version 4.0) [
79].
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of Platinum Complex Pt(L)Py.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of Platinum Complex Pt(L)Py.
Figure 1.
UV-Vis spectrum of 0.1 mM solution of Pt(L)Py in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The vertical bars represent the calculated electronic excitations.
Figure 1.
UV-Vis spectrum of 0.1 mM solution of Pt(L)Py in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The vertical bars represent the calculated electronic excitations.
Figure 2.
CV curve (red line) and DPV curve (black line) of 0.5 mM solution of the Pt(L)Py complex in CH2Cl2 with n-Bu4NBF4 (0.1 M) at a glass carbon electrode. Scan rate, 100 mV/s; reference, Fc+/Fc; T = 298 K. The potential scanning from 0.00 to +1.00 V, back to 0.00 V, second cycle further to +1.00 V and back to 0.00 V. The current scale is indicated for the CV curve.
Figure 2.
CV curve (red line) and DPV curve (black line) of 0.5 mM solution of the Pt(L)Py complex in CH2Cl2 with n-Bu4NBF4 (0.1 M) at a glass carbon electrode. Scan rate, 100 mV/s; reference, Fc+/Fc; T = 298 K. The potential scanning from 0.00 to +1.00 V, back to 0.00 V, second cycle further to +1.00 V and back to 0.00 V. The current scale is indicated for the CV curve.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of Platinum Complex [Pt(L)Py][BF4].
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of Platinum Complex [Pt(L)Py][BF4].
Figure 3.
Molecular structure of the complex [Pt(L)Py][BF4] (hydrogen atoms and CH2Cl2 molecules are omitted for clarity). Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): C(1)−Pt(1), 1.954(2); O(1)−Pt(1), 1.937(1); O(2)−Pt(1), 1.923(1); N(3)−Pt(1), 2.094(2); C(1)−Pt(1)−O(1), 95.03(7); C(1)−Pt(1)−O(2), 94.57(7); O(1)−Pt(1)−O(2), 170.38(6); C(1)−Pt(1)−N(3), 177.64(7); O(1)−Pt(1)−N(3), 83.21(6); O(2)−Pt(1)−N(3), 87.22(6); C(35)−N(3)−Pt(1)−O(2), 57.6(2).
Figure 3.
Molecular structure of the complex [Pt(L)Py][BF4] (hydrogen atoms and CH2Cl2 molecules are omitted for clarity). Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): C(1)−Pt(1), 1.954(2); O(1)−Pt(1), 1.937(1); O(2)−Pt(1), 1.923(1); N(3)−Pt(1), 2.094(2); C(1)−Pt(1)−O(1), 95.03(7); C(1)−Pt(1)−O(2), 94.57(7); O(1)−Pt(1)−O(2), 170.38(6); C(1)−Pt(1)−N(3), 177.64(7); O(1)−Pt(1)−N(3), 83.21(6); O(2)−Pt(1)−N(3), 87.22(6); C(35)−N(3)−Pt(1)−O(2), 57.6(2).
Figure 4.
(a) X-Band EPR spectrum of 0.5 mM solution of [Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH2Cl2. Black line: experimental spectrum; red line: simulation by considering g value of 2.070, a Lorentzian/Line width of 60.464/22.620 G, APt = 64.865 G (considering 31.332% rel. conc. of 195Pt); T = 298 K. (b) Variable-temperature EPR spectra of 0.5 mM solution of [Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH2Cl2.
Figure 4.
(a) X-Band EPR spectrum of 0.5 mM solution of [Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH2Cl2. Black line: experimental spectrum; red line: simulation by considering g value of 2.070, a Lorentzian/Line width of 60.464/22.620 G, APt = 64.865 G (considering 31.332% rel. conc. of 195Pt); T = 298 K. (b) Variable-temperature EPR spectra of 0.5 mM solution of [Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH2Cl2.
Figure 5.
Spin-density plot for [Pt(L)Py]+.
Figure 5.
Spin-density plot for [Pt(L)Py]+.
Figure 6.
UV-Vis (solid black line) and NIR (dashed black line) spectra of 0.1 mM solution of [Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The vertical red bars represent the calculated electronic excitations.
Figure 6.
UV-Vis (solid black line) and NIR (dashed black line) spectra of 0.1 mM solution of [Pt(L)Py][BF4] in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The vertical red bars represent the calculated electronic excitations.
Figure 7.
CV curves of 1 mM solution of the Pt(L)Py complex in CH2Cl2 with n-Bu4NBF4 (0.1 M) at a glass carbon electrode in the absence of MEA (red curve), in the presence of 0.12 M MEA (blue curve), in the presence of 0.24 M MEA (green curve). Black curve represents the CV of MEA in the absence of Pt(L)Py. Scan rate, 100 mV/s; reference, Fc+/Fc; T = 298 K.
Figure 7.
CV curves of 1 mM solution of the Pt(L)Py complex in CH2Cl2 with n-Bu4NBF4 (0.1 M) at a glass carbon electrode in the absence of MEA (red curve), in the presence of 0.12 M MEA (blue curve), in the presence of 0.24 M MEA (green curve). Black curve represents the CV of MEA in the absence of Pt(L)Py. Scan rate, 100 mV/s; reference, Fc+/Fc; T = 298 K.
Table 1.
Crystal data and structure refinement for complex [Pt(L)Py][BF4].
Table 1.
Crystal data and structure refinement for complex [Pt(L)Py][BF4].
Moiety Formula Sum Formula |
2(C39H55N3O2Pt), 2(BF4), 3(CH2Cl2) C81H116B2Cl6F8N6O4Pt2
|
formula weight |
2014.28 |
temperature [K] |
100(2) |
wavelength [Å] |
0.71073 |
crystal system, space group |
triclinic, (No. 2)
|
a [Å] |
9.7661(12) |
b [Å] |
13.8600(15) |
c [Å] |
16.8963(19) |
α [deg] |
102.107(3) |
β [deg] |
91.972(4) |
γ [deg] |
99.446(3) |
V [Å3] |
2200.2(4) |
Z, Dc [g cm−3] |
1, 1.520 |
absorption coefficient [mm−1] |
3.424 |
F(000) |
1016 |
crystal size [mm] |
0.30 × 0.10 × 0.02 |
Θ range for data collection [deg] |
2.4 – 32.0 |
limiting indices |
−14 ≤ h ≤ 14, −20 ≤ k ≤ 20, −25 ≤ l ≤ 25 |
reflections measured reflections unique observed reflections[I > 2σ(I)] |
113538 15266 14441 |
GOF on F2
|
1.093 |
data/restraints/parameters |
15266/ 2/ 516 |
final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] |
R1 = 0.0241, wR2 = 0.0588 |
R indices (all data) |
R1 = 0.0262, wR2 = 0.0593 |
largest diff. peak and hole [e Å−3] |
2.02 and -1.47 |
CCDC number |
2277791 |