1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from insulin resistance and/or impaired insulin secretion. The pathogenesis of diabetes involves complex immune and inflammatory processes that contribute to the development and progression of the disease [
1,
2]. Among the key players in these processes are soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (sICAM1) and soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (sVCAM1). This paper examines the role of insulin resistance-triggered glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) in endothelial cells as a potential source of circulating sVCAM1 in diabetic mice.
ICAM1 and VCAM1 are transmembrane glycoproteins expressed on the surface of various cell types, including endothelial cells and immune cells. They facilitate immune cell recruitment and adhesion during inflammation, which is crucial for the immune response. However, these adhesion molecules can undergo proteolytic cleavage during inflammatory conditions, releasing soluble forms into the bloodstream, referred to as sICAM1 and sVCAM1 [
3,
4]. Several studies have investigated the association between soluble CAM (sCAMs) levels and diabetes. Both sICAM1 and sVCAM1 have been implicated in the development of diabetic cardiovascular complications [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9]. In type 2 diabetes (T2D), increased sICAM1 levels have been reported in the serum of diabetic patients compared to healthy individuals [
6]. These elevated levels of sICAM1 are associated with insulin resistance, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for assessing diabetes risk and progression. sVCAM1 has particularly emerged as a biomarker in cardiovascular disease [
7]. Elevated levels of sVCAM1 have been observed in diabetic patients, particularly those with poor glycemic control and complications [
8]. Diabetes-related complications, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular disease, are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients [
10]. In diabetic retinopathy, increased sVCAM1 levels have been associated with the severity of retinal vascular abnormalities and inflammation in mice and humans [
9,
11]. Moreover, sVCAM1 has been linked to diabetic nephropathy, with higher levels observed in patients with renal dysfunction [
12]. Elevated levels of these soluble adhesion molecules are associated with endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, and increased cardiovascular risk in diabetic individuals[
13]. Thus, evidence suggests that sICAM1 and sVCAM1 may serve as indicators of diabetic complications. Given the role of sICAM1 and sVCAM1 in diabetic inflammation and complications, targeting these soluble adhesion molecules presents potential therapeutic implications. Inhibiting the expression or activity of sICAM1 and sVCAM1 could attenuate inflammatory responses and mitigate the progression of diabetic vascular disease. Preclinical studies have explored currently available and commonly used drugs and their effect on sICAM1 and sVCAM1 levels, demonstrating promising results in ameliorating diabetic vascular dysfunction[
14,
15]. Furthermore, emerging therapeutic strategies aim to directly target the interactions between sICAM1 and sVCAM1 with their receptors, preventing immune cell adhesion and inflammation in diabetes. Despite this knowledge, the source(s) for these increased circulating CAMs in diabetes or other conditions is not well defined.
sICAM1 and sVCAM1 undergo proteolytic cleavage from their membrane-bound forms in a dynamic process significantly influenced by the actions of a family of enzymes called ‘A Disintegrin and Metalloproteases (ADAMs)’. Among these enzymes, ADAM10 and ADAM17 stand out as key players in the generation of soluble adhesion molecules [
5,
16,
17,
18]. The proteolytic activity of ADAM10 and ADAM17 is tightly regulated to maintain homeostasis and prevent excessive proteolysis. Several mechanisms control their activation and substrate recognition. The dysregulation of ADAM10 and ADAM17 activity has been implicated in various inflammatory diseases and pathological conditions. Altered cleavage of ICAM1 and VCAM1 by these metalloproteases may contribute to the pathogenesis of conditions such as atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer [
16,
17,
18]. Understanding the regulation of these metalloproteases and their impact on soluble adhesion molecules may offer potential therapeutic targets for various inflammatory diseases. Here, we have uncovered that insulin resistance leads to the activation of GSK3β in mesenteric artery endothelial cells, which upregulates VCAM1 expression. GSK3β also independently activates ADAM10 and ADAM17 expression. Together, these metalloproteases cause the shedding of the VCAM1 ectodomain to increase extracellular levels of sVCAM1. A GSK3β inhibitor, tideglusib, was found to be effective in limiting activation of the enzyme and significantly reduced ectodomain shedding of VCAM1. Thus, this article highlights the source of sVCAM1 and identifies a potential checkpoint to prevent VCAM1 shedding that could improve cardiovascular function in diabetes.
3. Discussion
The role of circulating soluble cell adhesion molecules (sCAMs) as indicators of cardiovascular disease risk has been extensively debated. However, the precise sources for these sCAMs have yet to be identified. Cell-adhesion molecules are expressed in a wide variety of cells. Still, given their robust expression in endothelial cells (ECs) and the large surface area in the body that these cells occupy, it was reasonable to hypothesize endothelial cells as potential sources of sCAMs observed in the plasma during disease. This study examined if dysfunctional ECs secrete sCAMs, the potential signaling mechanisms involved, and possible therapeutic targeting to decrease sCAM levels in diabetic mice. Our results suggest that C57BL/6 mice on HFD for 6–8 weeks had a HOMA2-IR index of ~1.6, but after low-dose STZ injections, their HOMA2-IR values were ~2.4, suggesting the development of insulin resistance. Plasma sVCAM1 levels detected by ELISA showed an increase in sVCAM1 following the onset of insulin resistance (IR). To test the hypothesis that dysfunctional ECs likely released sVCAM1, mesenteric arteries from pre- and post-IR diabetic mice were isolated and primary cultured. Extracellular media collected from these EC cultures revealed an increase in sVCAM1 levels compared to control cells. Interestingly, protein analysis revealed that VCAM1 expression and two metalloproteases, ADAM10 and ADAM17, were upregulated in post-IR diabetic ECs. Overexpression of ADAM10 or 17 in control ECs revealed an increase in VCAM1 expression and extracellular sVCAM1 levels. Diabetic ECs had increased active GSK3β expression, and when GSK3β expression was activated in control ECs, the expression of ADAM10/17 and VCAM1 increased. Tideglusib, a specific GSK3β inhibitor, was tested both in vivo and in vitro. In both cases, there was a significant reduction in the expression of active GSK3β and plasma/extracellular sVCAM1 expression. These data collectively suggest that endothelial cells from insulin-resistant diabetic mice have upregulated GSK3β activity which increases VCAM1 expression and the expression of metalloproteases ADAM10 and 17 leading to cleavage of VCAM1 and shedding of its extracellular domain into the plasma as sVCAM1.
ICAM1 and VCAM1 are transmembrane glycoproteins expressed on the surface of various cell types, including endothelial cells and immune cells. They facilitate immune cell recruitment and adhesion during inflammation, which is crucial for a satisfactory immune response[
3,
4]. However, these adhesion molecules can undergo proteolytic cleavage during inflammatory conditions, releasing soluble forms into the bloodstream, referred to as soluble ICAM1 (sICAM1) and soluble VCAM1 (sVCAM1)[
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9]. These soluble forms of CAMs are involved in diverse immune processes beyond their cell-adhesion roles[
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
21,
22,
23]. They participate in leukocyte migration, transendothelial migration, and immune cell activation, influencing the immune response's overall outcome[
3,
21,
23,
24].
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, necessitating the identification of reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis. Several studies have investigated the association of sICAM1 and sVCAM1 with CVD, and their potential as diagnostic markers has been a subject of extensive debate[
4,
21,
22,
23,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30]. Elevated levels of both sICAM1 and sVCAM1 have been reported in individuals with CVD, with sVCAM1 levels emerging as a particularly promising predictor of adverse outcomes in cardiovascular conditions[
7,
13]. Researchers have proposed using monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors to target sICAM1 and sVCAM1 to dampen excessive immune responses in inflammatory diseases[
25,
28]. Such therapeutic interventions could mitigate tissue damage and reduce disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. Moreover, the significance of sVCAM1 in cardiovascular disease suggests its potential as a therapeutic target for managing atherosclerosis and related complications[
4,
21,
22,
23,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30]. Inhibition of sVCAM1 release or its interaction with immune cells could slow the progression of atherosclerosis and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Aside from their potential as diagnostic markers, these soluble CAMs have also garnered attention as potential therapeutic targets in various diseases, extending beyond CVD. Some research studies have investigated their involvement in cancer, indicating their possible relevance in a broader range of conditions[
31,
32,
33]. This expanding knowledge highlights the importance of understanding the complex roles of these soluble adhesion molecules in various disease contexts.
Results from our study show that plasma sVCAM1 levels increased after the onset of insulin resistance. We used the HFD-low dose STZ injections to induce insulin resistance in C57BL/6 mice. The C57BL/6 HFD-low dose STZ (HFD-STZ) model of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is an exceptional tool that closely imitates the polygenic nature of human disease [
34,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40,
41]. We chose the inducible model to precisely time the occurrence of insulin resistance in our study mice. It's worth noting here that this model's efficacy largely depends on the diet composition. The majority of studies employing this model (without STZ injections) utilize feed with 60% of its adjusted calories derived from fat. Despite this high-fat content, a considerable period of 9–11 weeks is still required to achieve reliable induction of insulin resistance[
42,
43]. US diets are estimated to be 30–40% energy from fat[
44,
45,
46]. In our study, we utilized the TD.88137 'Western diet,' which derives ~45% of its calorific value from milk fat. We also used an updated version of the HOMA-IR index calculator to estimate insulin resistance in our mice[
47,
48]. Our experimental mice typically achieved a HOMA2-IR index of ~2 or above, an accepted threshold for IR, after diet only for twelve weeks or more. Still, administration of low-dose STZ injections at ~8 weeks of HFD reliably induced insulin resistance with calculated HOMA2-IR indices of >2. Our next goal was to determine the source of soluble VCAM1.
Endothelial cells are known for their robust CAM expression. Typically, these proteins are plasma membrane-localized, and their levels increase during various inflammatory conditions to aid in the immune response. Diabetes is increasingly recognized as an inflammatory disease[
49,
50,
51]. While dysfunctional endothelium is commonly observed in diabetic vasculature[
52,
53], the crosstalk between endothelial cells and the immune system is still unclear. Given their large surface area, we tested the hypothesis that ECs and specifically from the mesenteric artery, are likely sources of circulating sVCAM1. In this study, extracellular sVCAM1 levels were increased in the media of cultured ECs from diabetic arteries. Interestingly, EC VCAM1 protein levels were also increased, suggesting that protein expression and cleavage are upregulated in diabetic ECs.
ADAMs, a group of transmembrane matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), play a significant role in the proteolytic cleavage of adhesion molecules and chemokines [
54]. In diabetic vasculature, the dysregulation of ADAMs has garnered significant interest due to their pivotal role in inflammation, cell adhesion, and extracellular matrix remodeling. ADAM10 and ADAM17 have been extensively studied in the context of diabetic vasculature. These metalloproteases are involved in the proteolytic cleavage of cell surface molecules, such as CX3CL1, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and JAM-A, which play essential roles in endothelial cell function and leukocyte adhesion[
5,
16,
17,
18]. Dysregulated ADAM activity can increase sCAM ectodomain shedding, contributing to endothelial dysfunction and the recruitment of inflammatory cells in diabetic vasculature[
55]. In diabetic retinopathy, ADAM17-mediated cleavage of CX3CL1 and VCAM-1 in retinal endothelial cells has been associated with vascular leakage and retinal neovascularization[
56]. Moreover, ADAM10-mediated shedding of CX3CL1 has been linked to diabetic nephropathy, where increased levels of soluble CX3CL1 contribute to kidney injury and fibrosis[
57]. In several CVDs, ADAM10 and ADAM17-mediated cleavage of adhesion molecules has been implicated in atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling[
58]. The elevated levels of sCAMs have been suggested as important mediators of progressive endothelial dysfunction seen in the diabetic vasculature that is often refractive to commonly employed anti-diabetic treatment strategies. In our study, expectedly, we found an increase in the expression of ADAM10 and ADAM17 in diabetic ECs. Hence, it was highly likely that one or both enzymes mediate the ectodomain cleavage and shedding of EC VCAM1.
We found that the critical instigator in EC VCAM1 expression and sVCAM1 shedding was GSK3β. Our data showed an increase in active GSK3β in ECs after the insulin resistance, which was associated with a concurrent increase in VCAM1, ADAM10, and 17 expressions. Insulin acts via the insulin receptor to activate downstream Akt signaling[
59,
60,
61,
62]. Insulin resistance is associated with dysfunctional Akt signaling[
59,
60,
61,
62]. Phosphorylation of GSK3β at serine-9 is critical in regulating the activation of GSK3β in cells. Akt kinase downstream to the insulin receptor is one of several kinases that can deactivate GSK3β[
59,
60,
61,
62]. GSK3β activation was shown to increase EC VCAM1 expression after TNF-alpha treatment[
63]. Hence it is likely that activated GSK3β directly increased the expression of VCAM1 in our diabetic ECs. Similarly, while active GSK3β was upregulated in diabetic ECs, activation of GSK3β in control ECs using an Akt inhibitor was followed by an increase in ADAM10 and 17 expressions. These results suggest that 1. Basal Akt activity in ECs plays a major role in modulating GSK3β activation and 2. ADAM10/17 upregulation was likely associated with the increase in GSK3β activation. Several other kinases are known to be activated in diabetes and it is possible that GSK3β is only one of the mechanisms that triggers ADAM10 and 17 upregulation. Finally, we tested the effect of a specific GSK3β inhibitor on EC sVCAM1 shedding. Tideglusib (NP-12, NP031112) is a selective and irreversible GSK3β inhibitor that was previously in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy[
64,
65,
66]. Although withdrawn for lack of efficacy in these conditions, the drug has remained a vital investigational tool. Tideglusib was administered to diabetic mice three days after completion of the STZ injections. Mice received the drug only with no other concurrent anti-diabetic therapy to help better identify the specific effects of GSK3β inhibition. One week of drug administration significantly decreased the whole mesenteric artery and EC GSK3β activation. There was also a significant drop in plasma and extracellular media sVCAM1 levels. These data suggest that arterial/EC GSK3β inhibition can significantly reduce the circulating levels of sVCAM1 and may offer long-term cardiovascular protection, especially when combined with other anti-diabetic drug therapies.
The interpretation of the upregulation of ADAM10 and ADAM17, particularly in ECs, is not straightforward due to its context-dependent implications. EC surface adhesion molecules, such as VCAM1, play a crucial role in mediating leukocyte attachment and infiltration. This suggests that VCAM1 ectodomain shedding by metalloproteases may regulate the local inflammatory response in healthy tissue. However, in the context of diabetes, multiple factors, including the activation of GSK3β, can trigger a self-sustaining deleterious feedback loop, further enhancing the expression of these metalloproteases. Recent research has shown that EC ADAM17 can cleave the insulin receptor ectodomain, leading to cellular insulin resistance[
67], which could exacerbate insulin resistance with initial upregulation of ADAM17 potentially leading to further GSK3β activation. Moreover, the role of circulating sVCAM1 and sICAM1 is likely more complex than anticipated. These circulating CAMs could induce the activation of circulating and resident immune cells, thus triggering an inflammatory response. Hence, the sheddase activity of ADAMs in the diabetic vasculature, along with the impact of released ectodomains into the circulation, needs renewed attention.
Figure 1.
C57BL6/J mice on a high-fat diet with low dose-streptozotocin injections develop T2D. (A) Body weight (g) readings from week 2 of HFD (age: 6 weeks) until week 12. STZ was injected into mice at wk8 of HFD and most mice were euthanized at wk10. n = 6 for each data point. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic control. (B) Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) recordings from non-diabetic controls, wk8 of HFD prior to STZ and wk10 after STZ injections. n = 30 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic. (C) Oral glucose tolerance test in control and HFD mice before and after STZ at wk8 and wk10 respectively. n = 6 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic. (D) Plasma insulin (pmol/L) in non-diabetic controls and HFD-STZ mice. n = 30 for each. (E) HOMA2-IR indices of non-diabetic, wk8 HFD and wk10 HFD-STZ mice calculated from values of (B,D). n = 30 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls.
Figure 1.
C57BL6/J mice on a high-fat diet with low dose-streptozotocin injections develop T2D. (A) Body weight (g) readings from week 2 of HFD (age: 6 weeks) until week 12. STZ was injected into mice at wk8 of HFD and most mice were euthanized at wk10. n = 6 for each data point. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic control. (B) Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) recordings from non-diabetic controls, wk8 of HFD prior to STZ and wk10 after STZ injections. n = 30 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic. (C) Oral glucose tolerance test in control and HFD mice before and after STZ at wk8 and wk10 respectively. n = 6 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic. (D) Plasma insulin (pmol/L) in non-diabetic controls and HFD-STZ mice. n = 30 for each. (E) HOMA2-IR indices of non-diabetic, wk8 HFD and wk10 HFD-STZ mice calculated from values of (B,D). n = 30 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls.
Figure 2.
Circulating sVCAM1 levels increase after STZ injections and onset of insulin resistance. (A) Plasma sVCAM1 levels measured from nondiabetic and HFD mice before (wk8) and after STZ (wk10) injections. n = 30 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic. (B) Photograph of the AbbyTM (ProteinSimple) Simple Western instrument showing loaded lanes and capillary setup. (C) Representative full length Simple Western of VCAM1 protein in isolated control and diabetic endothelial cells. Lane numbers indicate, 1: nondiabetic control, 2: HFD wk6, 3: HFD wk8, 4: HFD-STZ wk10. (D) Mean data of VCAM1 protein expression in diabetic ECs. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls. (E) Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of ECs isolated from nondiabetic or diabetic mice. n = 30 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls.
Figure 2.
Circulating sVCAM1 levels increase after STZ injections and onset of insulin resistance. (A) Plasma sVCAM1 levels measured from nondiabetic and HFD mice before (wk8) and after STZ (wk10) injections. n = 30 for each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic. (B) Photograph of the AbbyTM (ProteinSimple) Simple Western instrument showing loaded lanes and capillary setup. (C) Representative full length Simple Western of VCAM1 protein in isolated control and diabetic endothelial cells. Lane numbers indicate, 1: nondiabetic control, 2: HFD wk6, 3: HFD wk8, 4: HFD-STZ wk10. (D) Mean data of VCAM1 protein expression in diabetic ECs. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls. (E) Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of ECs isolated from nondiabetic or diabetic mice. n = 30 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls.
Figure 3.
Metalloproteases, ADAM10 and ADAM17 are involved in VCAM1 ectodomain shedding. (A) Representative full length Simple Western of ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteins in isolated control and diabetic endothelial cells. Lane numbers indicate, 1: nondiabetic control, 2: HFD wk8, 3: HFD-STZ wk10, 4: ADAM10 overexpression in control cells, 5: nondiabetic control, 6: HFD wk8, 7: HFD-STZ wk10, 8: ADAM17 overexpression in control cells. (B) Mean data of ADAM10 and ADAM17 protein fold change in wk10 HFD-STZ diabetic ECs and plasmid overexpression. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls or empty vector transfected. (C) Representative full length Simple Western of VCAM1 protein from samples of control cells transfected with empty vector or ADAM10 and 17 plasmids. Lane numbers indicate, 1: empty vector, 2: ADAM10 overexpression, 3: ADAM17 overexpression. (D) Mean data of VCAM1 protein fold change after ADAM10 or ADAM17 overexpression. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. empty vector transfected. (E) Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of ECs isolated from empty vector transfected or ADAM10 or ADAM17 overexpression cells. n = 8–9 each. *P < 0.05 vs. empty vector transfected.
Figure 3.
Metalloproteases, ADAM10 and ADAM17 are involved in VCAM1 ectodomain shedding. (A) Representative full length Simple Western of ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteins in isolated control and diabetic endothelial cells. Lane numbers indicate, 1: nondiabetic control, 2: HFD wk8, 3: HFD-STZ wk10, 4: ADAM10 overexpression in control cells, 5: nondiabetic control, 6: HFD wk8, 7: HFD-STZ wk10, 8: ADAM17 overexpression in control cells. (B) Mean data of ADAM10 and ADAM17 protein fold change in wk10 HFD-STZ diabetic ECs and plasmid overexpression. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic controls or empty vector transfected. (C) Representative full length Simple Western of VCAM1 protein from samples of control cells transfected with empty vector or ADAM10 and 17 plasmids. Lane numbers indicate, 1: empty vector, 2: ADAM10 overexpression, 3: ADAM17 overexpression. (D) Mean data of VCAM1 protein fold change after ADAM10 or ADAM17 overexpression. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. empty vector transfected. (E) Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of ECs isolated from empty vector transfected or ADAM10 or ADAM17 overexpression cells. n = 8–9 each. *P < 0.05 vs. empty vector transfected.
Figure 4.
GSK3β activation induces sVCAM1 shedding. (A) Representative full length Simple Western of pGSK3β (Ser9) protein in isolated control and diabetic endothelial cells. Lane numbers indicate, 1: nondiabetic control, 2: HFD wk8, 3: HFD-STZ wk10, 4: Control cells treated with MK2206. (B) Mean data. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic or untreated controls. (C) Representative full length Simple Western of VCAM1 in controls with/without MK2206. Lane numbers indicate, 1: untreated control, 2: control + MK2206. (D) Mean data of VCAM1 protein expression in control ECs with/without MK2206. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated controls. (E) Representative full length Simple Western of ADAM10 or ADAM17 proteins in control ECs with/without MK2206. Lane numbers indicate, 1,3: untreated controls, 2,4: control + MK2206. (F) Mean data. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated controls. G: Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of ECs treated with MK2206. n = 10 each. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated.
Figure 4.
GSK3β activation induces sVCAM1 shedding. (A) Representative full length Simple Western of pGSK3β (Ser9) protein in isolated control and diabetic endothelial cells. Lane numbers indicate, 1: nondiabetic control, 2: HFD wk8, 3: HFD-STZ wk10, 4: Control cells treated with MK2206. (B) Mean data. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic or untreated controls. (C) Representative full length Simple Western of VCAM1 in controls with/without MK2206. Lane numbers indicate, 1: untreated control, 2: control + MK2206. (D) Mean data of VCAM1 protein expression in control ECs with/without MK2206. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated controls. (E) Representative full length Simple Western of ADAM10 or ADAM17 proteins in control ECs with/without MK2206. Lane numbers indicate, 1,3: untreated controls, 2,4: control + MK2206. (F) Mean data. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated controls. G: Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of ECs treated with MK2206. n = 10 each. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated.
Figure 5.
Inhibition of GSK3β activation reduces sVCAM1 shedding. (A) Representative full length Simple Western of pGSK3β (Ser9) protein in isolated control and diabetic mesenteric artery samples and ECs. Lane numbers indicate, Mesenteric artery lysates from 1: Tideglusib treated and 2: wk10 HFD-STZ untreated; EC lysates from 3: Tideglusib treated and 4: wk10 HFD-STZ cells untreated. (B) Mean data. n = 6 each. #P < 0.05 vs. respective untreated diabetic. (C) Plasma sVCAM1 levels measured from nondiabetic and HFD mice after STZ (wk10) injections with/without Tideglusib treatment. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic, #P < 0.05 vs. untreated diabetic. (D) Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of wk10 HFD-STZ mesenteric artery ECs treated with Tideglusib in vitro. n = 7 each. #P < 0.05 vs. wk10 HFD-STZ ECs untreated.
Figure 5.
Inhibition of GSK3β activation reduces sVCAM1 shedding. (A) Representative full length Simple Western of pGSK3β (Ser9) protein in isolated control and diabetic mesenteric artery samples and ECs. Lane numbers indicate, Mesenteric artery lysates from 1: Tideglusib treated and 2: wk10 HFD-STZ untreated; EC lysates from 3: Tideglusib treated and 4: wk10 HFD-STZ cells untreated. (B) Mean data. n = 6 each. #P < 0.05 vs. respective untreated diabetic. (C) Plasma sVCAM1 levels measured from nondiabetic and HFD mice after STZ (wk10) injections with/without Tideglusib treatment. n = 6 each. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic, #P < 0.05 vs. untreated diabetic. (D) Mean data of sVCAM1 levels in culture media of wk10 HFD-STZ mesenteric artery ECs treated with Tideglusib in vitro. n = 7 each. #P < 0.05 vs. wk10 HFD-STZ ECs untreated.