Preprint
Article

Integration of Evaporative Greenhouse, Internet of Things and Root-zone Cooling to Enhance Growth and Development of Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) in Tropical Climate

Altmetrics

Downloads

167

Views

106

Comments

0

Submitted:

21 August 2023

Posted:

22 August 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The experiment was carried out during October 2022 to January 2023 at Mae Hea Agricultural Research, Demonstration and Training Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand; latitude: 18° 44′ 36″ North, Longitude: 98° 57′ 50″ East, and an al-titude 304 msl. Evaporative greenhouse, 9.6 x 40 square meters, with 8 planting troughs was prepared, Sensors and Internet of Things (IoT) system were installed to monitor continuously vital parameters, collect data, and send timely alerts to facilitate problem resolution. The data were displayed via IoT platform dashboard. An average air temperature, light intensity, media moisture and CO2 concentration in the greenhouse during 4 months was 21.1 ◦C, 12,948 Lux, 2 kPa and 495 ppm, respectively. The average maximum temperature in the evaporative greenhouse was 29.6 ◦C, which 4.2 ◦C lower than outside; 33.8 ◦C. Root-zone cooling of the strawberry planting was de-signed as factorial 3x4 in completely randomized design (CRD). Factor A was the short-day strawberry cultivars: 1) “Pharachatan 88” 2) “Pharachatan 80” and 3) “Akihime”. Factor B was the root-zone cooling treatments: 1) normal water dripping (NWD) 2) cold water dripping (CWD) 3) cold water dripping + cold water piping (CWD+CWP) and 4) normal water dripping + cold water piping (NWD+CWP). The results revealed that there was an interaction between the two factors on canopy width, leave width, crown diameter, number of flowers, fruit qualities and fruit color, whereas plant height, leaves length, SPAD and number of inflorescences were not affected by the interaction between the two factors. Four months after the experiment, the root-zone cooling treatments had no effect on chlorophyll contents, whereas “Pharachatan 80” had lower chlorophyll content than others. The CWD+CWP treatment could reduce 2 °C of root-zone temperature and leading to promote vegetative and reproductive growth in strawberry plants. Anyhow, without the root-zone cooling treatment, “Akihime”and “Pharachatan 88” still could produce flowers and yield, but “Pharachatan 80” could not. Furthermore, “Akihime” seemed appreciable in flowering, TSS and yield as compared to others.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Horticulture

1. Introduction

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is one of the most widely grown economic fruits in many countries of temperate, tropical and subtropical regions, which are different in terms of climate condition. Strawberry is a subtropical fruit that can be adapted and perform well with various climatic conditions. Recently, the consumption of fresh strawberry and industrial processing have increased dramatically [1]. The world production of strawberry is 9.2 million tones China is the largest strawberry producer in the world with 3.8 million tonnes. USA comes second with 1.21 million tonnes and Turkey is the third largest producer with 0.67 million tonnes [2]. In northern part of Thailand, which located in sub-tropical region, is a major area for strawberry production. In 2022, there were around 1,116.32 ha production areas and yielding 19,049 tons in Samoeng, Kalayaniwattana, Mae Wang, Mae Chaem, Fang, and Mae Rim districts, Chiang Mai province [3]. Strawberry cultivation system in Thailand is almost in open field. Planting strawberry is performed during September-October. The strawberry plants require low temperature around of 10-15 °C and daylength less than 14 hrs (short day condition) for flower initiation and preferring cool weather for fruit growth and development [4,5]. Flowering, yield and fruit qualities are strongly depended on the temperature. Climate change make rising in temperature that makes heat stress in strawberry plant causing poor flowering, fruit ripen too quickly leading to low fruit qualities, small size, low sugar, less of aroma and poor texture. In addition, affecting the incidence and severity of pests and diseases [6,7]. Therefore, the climate changes have significantly affected on strawberry production. To mitigate the effects of climate change; protected cultivation and controlling weather conditions have been considered. Growing strawberry plants in the greenhouses is very successful in many temperate-zone countries. The plants can be harvested 3-4 weeks faster and getting more yield than open field production and also preventing damages from heavy rain, cold temperature during the autumn and winter [8,9]. In Thailand, evaporative greenhouse can optimize growing conditions, including temperature, humidity, and light. This can result in higher quality and yield of strawberry production. Anyhow, evaporative cooling works by reducing temperature through the evaporation of water. In tropical areas with high ambient temperature, particularly in day time, it can be challenging to achieve adequate cooling. Compared to air conditioning and refrigeration systems, these systems have lower installation and operating costs. It is advantageous that the temperature inside an evaporative greenhouse is independent of the outdoor temperature. Instead, it largely depends on the dew point temperature, and the relative humidity is relatively low. Insects may become entrapped on the pads’ wet surface. Intensive programs of pest management must be provided for strawberry production in the evaporative greenhouse system [10].
Beyond conventional greenhouses, the implementation of smart farming could boost crop production. Automation may ease the management of growth parameters including temperature, humidity, light, soil moisture, and others [11]. Combining wireless sensors, Internet of Things devices, and artificial intelligence algorithms for real-time data transmission can aid in crop yield forecasting. Urban farming has become essential for guaranteeing food security in areas with high population density [12]. Components of the Internet of Things consist of sensors, wired/wireless communication systems, embedded circuits or microcontrollers, and cloud servers with applicable applications. These components must be chosen to satisfy both the needs of the cultivator and the vegetable growth process. Before selecting the appropriate hardware, it is necessary to collect preliminary survey data, such as geographic location, greenhouse capacity, and soil conditions, among others. Literature suggests that a cost-effective IoT system can effectively automate greenhouse setup [11,13,14]. Arduino Uno is a cost-effective and farmer-friendly microprocessor that is extremely precise and efficient setup [24]. The data monitored, acquired, and gathered by these microcontrollers can result in more efficient plant growth and resource utilization. [15] suggested controlling the greenhouse’s ventilation and temperature.
Studying in root-zone temperature is also hence the growth and development, floral cluster development and chemical compositions in many plants [16,17]. [16] showed that cooling root-zone treatment enhanced inflorescences and fruits of strawberry. [18] discovered that nutrient uptake was greatest when the temperature of the root zone was 18°C. The cool treatment enhances water and nutrient absorption by promoting better root function, preventing water stress, and maintaining optimal hydration levels in the plant. This is particularly important for strawberry plants, as they have shallow root systems that are susceptible to drying out in warm conditions. Cooling the root zone can help alleviate heat stress in strawberry plants. Higher root temperature can trigger early flowering and accelerate fruit ripening, resulting in low fruit qualities and a shorter harvesting period. By cooling the root zone, the strawberry plants are better prepared to withstand heat stress, leading to healthier plants and improved yields [19,20]. Cooling root zone techniques such as drip irrigation, mulching, and shading can be employed. These methods help regulate soil temperature, maintain moisture levels, and provide shade to the root system [21,22]. [6] found that fruit contained more fructose, glucose, and total carbohydrates when root zone temperatures were lower (18/12°C). Plastics mulching, air conditioning devices and underground source cooling with heat pumps as a cooler are the techniques used to reduce growth medium temperature. It is important to monitor soil temperature and adjust cooling strategies accordingly to ensure optimal growing conditions for strawberry plants [23]. In this study aimed to investigate growth and development of strawberry grown under evaporative system together with root zone cooling technique and IoT sensors to increase flowering and yield of strawberry in tropical area.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiment was carried out at Mae Hea Agricultural Research, Demonstration and Training Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand; Latitude: 18° 44′ 36″ North, Longitude: 98° 57′ 50″ East, and an altitude 304 msl.

2.1. Plant materials and experimental design

The three short-day cultivars of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa); “Pharachatan 88” (“P88”), “Pharachatan 80” (“P80”) and “Akihime” were used in the experiment. Disease-free plantlets from tissue culture were acclimatized in the greenhouse for 1 day and transplanted in the 3 inches pot which contained perlite mixed with coconut coir. After 45 days, the strawberries plants produced stolons and daughter plants. Then, the three-week-old daughter plants in each cultivar were collected, transplanted, and nursed in the greenhouse for the experiment.
Factorial 3x4 in completely randomized design (CRD) was used in this experiment. Factor A were 3 strawberry short-day cultivars; 1) “P88” 2) “P80” and 3) “Akihime”. Factor B were 4 root-zone cooling treatments: 1) normal water dripping (NWD) 2) cold water (10-15 C) dripping (CWD) 3) cold water dripping + cold water piping (CWD+CWP) and 4) normal water dripping + cold water piping (NWD+CWP). Watering 5 times with 1 minute each time during 13:00-17:00 o’clock were done, which strawberry plant received 100 ml of water/ plant/ day.

2.2. Greenhouse conditions, root-zone cooling system and strawberry planting

The evaporative greenhouse, 9.6 x 40 square meters, has a circular cover wrapped in 1.5-millimeter-thick transparent plastic protection with pad-and-fans covered on two sides by a 300 micron-thick, single-layer plastic material (Figure 1).
The strawberry root-zone cooling system consists of several components, including a cooling water tank (a one-cubic-meter insulated plastic container) (Figure 2), an electric pump, pipelines embedded in growing media, and a control unit. The tank was filled with nutrient-rich water in proportion to the anticipated daily water consumption. A cooling coil from a 12000 BTU modified air conditioning unit is submerged in the tank. The unit utilizes a type-K thermocouple thermostat to maintain the tank water temperature between 10-15 C. The system consists of a 220V, 0.5 horsepower centrifugal water pump.
In September, 2022, 256 strawberry daughter plants were grown 25 cm distancing each in planting trough contained perlite mixed with peatmoss at a ratio 30:70 by volume with 4 different cooling root zone treatments (Figure 3). Sensor specifications for temperatures, relative humidity, carbon dioxide and light intensity measurement were explained in Table 1. The IoT system controlled a daily water drip of 100 milliliters in each plant. This is achieved by administering 20 milliliters of water per drip, five times a day, with each drip lasting for one minute.

2.3. Greenhouse monitoring system

Climate conditions in the evaporative greenhouse such as temperature, relative humidity, light intensity, CO2 content, as well as media temperature and media moisture were monitored by installed sensors and IoT system (Table 1). Figure 4 depicts the schematic diagram of the components including a pad-and-fans evaporative cooling, u-shape grown-media channels, cold-water storage and pipelines, sensors and IoT system.
A temperature monitor embedded in the growing media controls the operation of the pump. Using insulated PVC pipelines, cold water is circulated through double steel pipes inserted into the growing media (Figure 5) and then returned to the storage tank. Utilizing double pipelines maximizes the surface area for heat transmission between the cold water inside the pipe and the growing media. The calculation for this is straightforward, using the convective heat loss equals capacity heat in fluid, or q=mcp∆T, formula. Lastly, the control box serves multiple functions: it regulates the operation of the pump based on the soil temperature probe, manages refrigeration systems based on the water temperature probe in the tank, and accumulates data from all sensors in the growth channel to relay to the IoT junction box.

2.4. Physiology Measurement

Strawberries were planted under evaporative greenhouse from late of September 2022. Plant height, canopy width, leaf width, leaf length, crown diameter, number of inflorescences and number of flowers were measured, as well as chlorophyll content (by using SPAD-502; Minolta Corp., Spectrum Technologies, Osaka, Japan), fruit weight, fruit size and fruit firmness.

2.5. Total soluble solid

The total soluble solid was measured by using digital refractometer. It has a wide measurement range of 0.0 - 53.0% Brix (ATAGO Pal-1, ATAGO Co., Tokyo, Japan)

2.6. Colorimetric evaluation (CIEL*a*b*)

The Colorimetric evaluation was measured by Konica Minolta CR-400, Japan which the lightness value, L* defines black at 0 and white at 100. The a* axis is relative to the green–magenta opponent colors, with negative values toward green and positive values toward magenta. The b* axis represents the blue–yellow opponents, with negative numbers toward blue and positive toward yellow [19].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistically comparative data were analyzed by analysis of variance and mean difference was compared using LSD at a 95% confidence level by using Statistica 9 software (analytical software SX, version 9, Tallahassee, FL, USA).

3. Results

The data from IoT sensor system showed that during October, 2022 until January, 2023, average air temperatures in the evaporative greenhouse were 23.2, 21.6, 21.1 and 18.6 °C, respectively. The maximum and minimum of temperatures and RH were 29.6 °C, 15.9 °C, 90% and 56%, respectively (Table 2). Average CO2 concentration was 495 ppm and light intensity was 43,923 lux (Table 3). On the other hand, in outdoor condition the air temperature during 4 months was 25.6, 24.9, 23.0 and 20.8, respectively. The maximum and minimum temperatures and RH were 33.8 °C, 14.3 °C, 98% and 34%, respectively (Table 4). The maximum temperature in evaporative greenhouse was lower than maximum outdoor temperature about 4 °C, anyhow the minimum temperature was higher about 2 °C than outdoor.
In the first month after cooling treatments (October), the root-zone temperatures (RZT) of strawberry plants were not significantly different among treatments. The average RZT was 23.8, 24.3, 22.9 and 24.4 °C in NWD, CWD, CWD+CWP and NWD+CWP treatment, respectively. Anyhow three months after that (January), the RZT was 19.2, 19.7, 17.7 and 19.5 °C, respectively. The CWD+CWP treatment could reduce RZT about 2 °C as compared to others. It seemed that NWD, CWD and NWD+CWP treatments gave no different temperatures in the root zone (Figure 6). The dashboard features graphs of growing media, air, and water temperatures, ambient and indoor relative humidity, light intensity and carbon dioxide concentration. Figure 7 depicts the example plot display root-zone temperatures in different cooling treatments.
Three months after treatment, there was an interaction between 2 factors as in Table 6. Each strawberry cultivar responded to the root-zone cooling treatments differently. “P80” and “Akihime” strawberry in all root-zone cooling treatments showed higher performance in canopy width and leave width significantly than “P88”. On the other hand, “P88” and “Akihime” strawberry together with CWD+CWP treatment gave bigger crown than “P80” which had no difference in crown diameter (Table 6). In terms of reproductive growth, CWD+CWP and NWD+CWP treatments seemed to promote flowering in “P80” and “Akihime” strawberry. Anyhow, “P80” strawberry had few numbers of flower as compared to “P88” and “Akihime” (Table 7). The interaction was not found in plant height, leave length, chlorophyll content and number of inflorescences. “Akihime” gave the highest plant height and leave width as compared to “P80” and “P88”. Whereas, “P80” had the lowest chlorophyll content and the number of inflorescences. The root-zone cooling treatments had no effect on the chlorophyll content. Furthermore, CWD+CWP treatment could promote number of inflorescences significantly as compared to normal water treatment (Table 8). There was an interaction between 2 factors in term of fruit qualities. The root-zone cooling treatments trended to have better fruit qualities, particularly in “Akihime”, in term of fruit weight, fruit length, TSS, yield and fruit color. Anyhow, “P88” gave higher fruit firmness than other cultivars (Table 9 and Table 10) (Figure 7 and Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Strawberry is classified in a group of sub-tropical fruit. Almost commercial strawberry cultivars are June-bearing or short-day strawberry that need cool temperature (vernalization) to induce flower bud. Strawberry plants vernalized at 2 °C for 2 weeks had the highest percentage of flowering, number of inflorescences, number of flowers per inflorescence and number of flowers per plant as compared to vernalized at 4 °C [24]. [25] also indicated that cooling of the crown to 10–20°C induced flower bud differentiation of June-bearing strawberries. Extreme high or low temperature effected on flower development pollination and fruit malformation in strawberry [26,27] Nowadays, climate change and global warming raise ambient and soil temperatures causing strawberry productivity to decline. Protected strawberry cultivation or strawberry production in greenhouse is alternative way to avoid the effects of climate conditions [28].
Nowadays, IoT applications have been used widely to make smart farming. [29] used the IoT system to analyze environmental and crop information in strawberry plantation. The IoT system consists of three major components which are sensor device, IoT cloud, and platform. [30] also reported that the IoT system can provide in the greenhouse strawberry production in Malaysia. It helps to increase efficiency in terms of monitoring and data acquisition for research purposes. Furthermore, it will allow for precision application of nutrients, pesticide and water to the strawberry. Thailand located in tropical region, strawberry production in the greenhouse faced on high temperature during summer leading to poor flowering and short harvesting period. In this study, installed sensors and IoT system were effective to monitor parameters that affecting growth and development of strawberry. In this experiment cold water was automatically dripped to manipulate root zone temperature (RZT) of three short-day strawberry cultivars grown in evaporative greenhouse. The results revealed that dripping the cold water (10-15 ◦C) direct onto the surface of growing media could not reduce RZT during October, 2022-January, 2023. The growing media was a mixer 70:30 percentage of peatmoss and perlite. The perlite is an insulator to keep temperature consistently, dripping 10-15 ◦C cold-water for 1 minute 5 times in the afternoon (20 ml/time) might be not sufficient to reduce temperature in the growing media. Interestingly, the cold-water dripping combined with embedding cold-water pipe in the growing media could reduce about 2 ◦C RZT. The maximum RZT was 23.4 ◦C and the minimum was 11.1 ◦C, while average air temperature and RH was 21.5 ◦C and 84%, respectively. Average CO2 concentration and light intensity in the evaporative greenhouse was 495 ppm and 43,923 lux, respectively. These conditions could promote vegetative and reproductive growth of strawberry plants in our experiment. It was also reported that increasing light intensity from 27,000 to 54,000 lux at 15-21 ◦C was increasing in CO2-uptake and photosynthesis of June-bearing strawberry [31]. Optimum RZT enhances respiration, oxygen consumption and cell viability of the root leading to high nutrient uptake and biomass accumulation. RZT could also alter the vegetative and reproductive growth of hydroponically grown strawberry plants [20]. [32] found that large RZT fluctuations negatively affected strawberry plant growth and leaf area as well as an uptake of some nutrients. Consistently with [33] reported that groundwater cooling was reduced rhizosphere temperature from 26.9 C to 24.9 C and effective in improving the growth and productivity of strawberries under high temperature conditions. Furthermore, cooling RZT at around 20°C with short-day (8-h daylength) treatment for 22 days accelerated and stabilized the flower bud formation of two cultivars, “Nyoho” and “Tochiotome” [19]. On the other hand, it was found that root-zone heating to maintain temperature 20-23 ◦C was effective in increasing the productivity and quality of strawberries during winter-season cultivation in the greenhouse [34]. In our experiment, “Akihime” and “P88” strawberry after the RZC treatments gave better flowering and yield than “P80”. The RZC treatments had no effect on chlorophyll contents, whereas “P80” had lower chlorophyll content than others. In addition, RZC treatments seemed to enhance fruit weight, TSS and yield as compared to non-cooling treatment. Different strawberry cultivars responded to environmental conditions differently. Six strawberry cultivars; “Maehyang”, “Seolhyang”, “Keumhyang” (Korean short-day cultivars), “Akihime”, “Red pearl”, and “Sachinoka” (Japanese short-day cultivars) were exposed to short-day (10-h photoperiods) conditions at 800 m elevation for 35 days beginning in late June and found that they produced number of flowers and fruits differently [35]. The seven 9 h short days at 21/21 °C (day/night) followed by seven 9 h short days at 21/12 °C (day/night) was the most effective conditioning treatment for off-season ‘Sweet Charlie’ strawberry production in greenhouse [36]. [37] reported that strawberry fruit harvested at a root zone temperature of 15 °C had greater soluble solid content (SSC) than harvested at 22 °C. Higher RZT affected on less uptake of P, K and Mg bout 35% [30]. It has been known that K plays crucial role on sugar translocation from source to sink. [38] indicated that K nutrient is positively correlated with sugar content (°Brix) in “Fortuna” strawberry fruit. Study in another plant, such as tomato, it was also confirmed that cooling RZT promoted growth and nutrient uptake as well as effected sugar accumulation in tomato fruit [39]. It can be concluded that the integration of evaporative greenhouse, internet of things and root-zone cooling can enhance growth, flowering, fruit quality and yield of strawberry in tropical lowland cultivation.

5. Conclusions

The IoT system monitored, collected and displayed climatic conditions under the evaporative greenhouse during October, 2022 until January, 2023 and indicated that average air temperature was 21.1 °C with 83.9% RH, 495 ppm CO2 and 12,948 Lux light intensity. Under these conditions the cold-water dripping (10-15 °C) combined with embedding cold-water pipe in the growing media treatment could reduce root zone temperature about 2 °C and leading to promote the vegetative and reproductive growth of “Akihime”, “Pharachatan 88” and “Pharachatan 80” strawberry cultivars as well as fruit qualities and yield. Without the root-zone cooling treatment, “Akihime”and “Pharachatan 88” still could produce flowers and yield, but “Pharachatan 80” could not. Therefore, “Pharachatan 80” cultivar might not be preferable for growing in the evaporative greenhouse at altitude 304 msl.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Daruni Naphrom; Data curation, Werapat Panchai and Anucha Promwungkwa; Formal analysis, Nuttapong Na nan; Investigation, Kaewalin Kunasakdakul; Project administration, Daruni Naphrom; Resources, Kaewalin Kunasakdakul and Suwit Boonraeng; Software, Anucha Promwungkwa; Supervision, Anucha Promwungkwa; Validation, CHOOCHAD SANTASUP and Werapat Panchai; Writing – original draft, Daruni Naphrom and Anucha Promwungkwa; Writing – review & editing, Anucha Promwungkwa.

Funding

Fundamental Fund, 2022 was supported by (i) Chiang Mai University (CMU), (ii) Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), and (iii) National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF)” Thailand Science, Research, and Innovation (TSRI).

Data Availability Statement

D.N. and A.P. are responsible for data keeping, and data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the Central Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, and Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, for supporting materials, scientific equipment and places to conduct research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nelda, R. Hernández-Martínez, Caroline Blanchard, Daniel Wells, Melba R. Salazar-Gutiérrez, Current state and future perspectives of commercial strawberry production: A review, Scientia Horticulturae, 2023, 312, 111893.
  2. Strawberry production in 2021, Crops/Regions/World list/Production Quantity (pick lists)". UN.
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization, Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT). 2023. (accessed on 2 August 2023).
  4. Konlanna. 2023. “Chiang Mai Agriculture Extension Office invites to visit the 20th strawberry and best products festival 2023 in Samoeng District”. Available online: https://konlanna.com/contents/read/2004 (accessed on 16 February 2023).
  5. Phiphatthanawong, N. Strawberry New Economic Crops; Kasetsart University: Bangkok, Thailand, 2007; p. 158. [Google Scholar]
  6. Phiphatthanawong, N. Strawberry production and the royal project foundation, Thailand. Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture 2015, 10, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, S.Y.; Camp, M.J. Temperatures after bloom affect plant growth and fruit quality of strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae 2000, 85, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Palencia, P.; Martinez, F.; Medina, J. J.; Vázquez, E.; Flores, F.; López-Medina, J. Effects of climate change on strawberry production. Acta Hortic, 2009, 838, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khammayom, N.; Maruyama, N.; Chaichana, C. The effect of climatic parameters on strawberry production in a small walk-in greenhouse. AgriEngineering 2022, 4, 104–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khoshnevisan, B.; Rafiee, S.; Mousazadeh, H. Environmental impact assessment of open field and greenhouse strawberry production. European journal of Agronomy 2013, 50, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bucklin, R. A.; Henley, R. W.; McConnell, D. B. Fan and pad greenhouse evaporative cooling systems. Circular Florida Cooperative Extension Service 1993.USA.
  12. Saha, T.; Jewel, M. K. H.; Mostakim, M. N.; Bhuiyan, N. H.; Ali, M. S.; Rahman, M. K.; Ghosh, H. K.; Hossain, M. K. Construction and development of an automated greenhouse system using Arduino Uno. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business 2017, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shamshiri, R.R.; Hameed, I.A.; Thorp, K.R.; Balasundram, S.K.; Shafian, S.; Fatemieh, M.; Sultan, M.; Mahns, B.; Samiei, S. Greenhouse automation using wireless sensors and IoT instruments integrated with artificial intelligence. Next-generation greenhouses for food security 2021.
  14. Gutiérrez, E.; Gutiérrez, S.; Becerril, J.A.; Rodríguez, F. Low-cost prototype for monitoring and remote control in greenhouse for homes. In 2018 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC) 2018, pp 1-5.
  15. Hoque, M.J.; Ahmed, M.R.; Hannan, S. An automated greenhouse monitoring and controlling system using sensors and solar power. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research 2020, 5, 510–515. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bhuvaneswari, T.; Yao, J.T.H. Automated greenhouse. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA) 2014 pp. 194-199.
  17. Sakamoto, M.; Uenishi, M.; Miyamoto, K.; Suzuki, T. Effect of root-zone temperature on the growth and fruit quality of hydroponically grown strawberry plants. Journal of Agricultural Science 2016, 8, 122–131. [Google Scholar]
  18. Greer, D.H.; Wünsche, J.N.; Norling, C.L.; Wiggins, H.N. Root-zone temperatures affect phenology of bud break, flower cluster development, shoot extension growth and gas exchange of ‘Braeburn’ (Malus domestica) apple trees. Tree Physiology 2006, 26, 105-111.
  19. Udagawa, Y.; Ito, T.; Gomi, K. Effects of root temperature on the absorption of water and mineral nutrients by strawberry plants ‘Reiko’ grown hydroponically. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1991, 59, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mizuno, S.; Muramatsu, Y.; Tateishi, A.; Watanabe, K.; Shinmachi, F.; Koshioka, M.; Kubota, S. Effects of Root-zone Cooling with Short-day Treatment in Pot-grown Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) Nurseries on Flowering and Fruit Production. The Horticulture Journal 2022, 91, 1–7.
  21. Masaru, S.; Uenishi, M.; Miyamoto, K.; Suzuki, T. Effect of Root-Zone Temperature on the Growth and Fruit Quality of Hydroponically Grown Strawberry Plants. Journal of Agricultural Science 2016, 8, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deschamps, S.S.; Whitaker, V.M.; Agehara, S. White-striped plastic mulch reduces root-zone temperatures during establishment and increases early season yields of annual winter strawberry. Scientia horticulturae 2019, 243, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, S.; Dey, P. Effects of different mulches and irrigation methods on root growth, nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency and yield of strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae 2011, 127, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moritani, S.; Nanjo, H.; Itou, A.; Imai, T. Root-zone cooling evaluation using heat pump for greenhouse strawberry production. HortTechnology 2018, 28, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thammasophon, T.; Pusadee, T.; Bundithya, W.; Naphrom, D. Effects of Vernalization on Off–Season Flowering and Gene Expression in Sub-Tropical Strawberry cv. Pharachatan 80. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hidaka, K.; Dan, K.; Imamura, H.; Takayama, T. Crown-cooling treatment induces earlier flower bud differentiation of strawberry under high air temperatures. Environ. Control. Biol. 2017, 55, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cui, M.; Pham, M. D.; Hwang, H.; Chun, C. Flower development and fruit malformation in strawberries after short-term exposure to high or low temperature. Scientia Horticulturae 2021, 288, 110308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ariza, M.T.; Soria, C.; Medina-Mínguez, J.J.; Martínez-Ferri, E. Incidence of misshapen fruits in strawberry plants grown under tunnels is affected by cultivar, planting date, pollination, and low tempera-tures. Hortscience 2012, 47, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salamé-Donoso, T. P.; Santos, B. M.; Chandler, C. K.; Sargent, S. A. Effect of high tunnels on the growth, yields, and soluble solids of strawberry cultivars in Florida. International Journal of Fruit Science 2010, 10, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cruz, M.; Mafra, S.; Teixeira, E.; Figueiredo, F. Smart strawberry farming using edge computing and IoT. Sensors 2022, 22, 5866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elijah,O. ; Bakhit,A.A.; Rahman, T.A., Tien Han Chua, T.H., Ausordin, S.F., Rifhan Narrissa Razali, R.N., Eds.; Production of strawberry using internet of things: a review. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 2019, 15(3), pp. 1621-1628. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rivero, R.; Sønsteby, A.; Solhaug, K.A.; Heide, O.M; Remberg, S.F. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on photosynthesis in everbearing strawberry. Acta Hortic 2021, 1309, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonzalez-Fuentes, J.A.; Shackel, K.; Lieth, J.H.; Albornoz, F.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Ev-ans, R.Y. Diurnal root zone temperature variations affect strawberry water relations, growth, and fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 2016, 203, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, G.B.; Lee, J.E.; Choe, Y.U.; Park, Y.H.; Choi, Y.W.; Kang, N.J.; Kang, J.S. Effects of Groundwater Cooling Treatment on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Strawberries under High Temperature Conditions. Journal of Environmental Science International 2018, 27, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jo, W.J.; Shin, J.H. Effect of root-zone heating using positive temperature coefficient film on growth and quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) in greenhouses. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 2022, 63, 89-100.
  36. Ruan, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Yeoung, Y.R.; Larson, K. Influence of short-day treatment on autumn fruit production of June-bearing strawberry cultivars. Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnology 2011, 52, 259-264.
  37. 37. Durner, Edward F. "Photoperiod and temperature conditioning of ‘Sweet Charlie’ strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa Duch.) plugs enhances off-season production. Scientia horticulturae 2016, 201, 184-189.
  38. MacKenzie, S.J.; Chandler, C.K. , The late season decline in strawberry fruit soluble solid content observed in Florida is caused by rising temperatures. Acta Hortic 2008, 842, 843–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nakro, A.; Bamouh, A.; Bouslama, H.; San Bautista, A.; Ghaouti, L. The effect of potassium–nitrogen balance on the yield and quality of strawberries grown under soilless conditions. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, F.; Thiele, B.; Watt, M.; Kraska, T.; Ulbrich, A.; Kuhn, A. J. , Effects of root cooling on plant growth and fruit quality of cocktail tomato during two consecutive seasons. Journal of Food Quality 2019, 3598172, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The evaporative greenhouse equipped with a pad-and-fan system. The exhaust blowers draw in outdoor air through water-cooling pad to lower the room’s temperature.
Figure 1. The evaporative greenhouse equipped with a pad-and-fan system. The exhaust blowers draw in outdoor air through water-cooling pad to lower the room’s temperature.
Preprints 82959 g001
Figure 2. Cooling water tank system to generate 10-15 ◦C cold water.
Figure 2. Cooling water tank system to generate 10-15 ◦C cold water.
Preprints 82959 g002
Figure 3. Four cooling root zone treatments; (a) normal water dripping (NWD), (b) cold water dripping (CWD), (c) cold water dripping + cold water piping (CWD+CWP) and (d) normal water dripping + cold water piping (NWD+CWP).
Figure 3. Four cooling root zone treatments; (a) normal water dripping (NWD), (b) cold water dripping (CWD), (c) cold water dripping + cold water piping (CWD+CWP) and (d) normal water dripping + cold water piping (NWD+CWP).
Preprints 82959 g003
Figure 4. Single line diagram of the evaporative greenhouse and root zone cooling system.
Figure 4. Single line diagram of the evaporative greenhouse and root zone cooling system.
Preprints 82959 g004
Figure 5. Double steel pipes of cold water inserted into the growing media.
Figure 5. Double steel pipes of cold water inserted into the growing media.
Preprints 82959 g005
Figure 6. Root-zone temperature of strawberry plants after treatments.
Figure 6. Root-zone temperature of strawberry plants after treatments.
Preprints 82959 g006
Figure 7. The dashboard displays root-zone temperatures in different cooling treatments.
Figure 7. The dashboard displays root-zone temperatures in different cooling treatments.
Preprints 82959 g007
Figure 7. The “P88” and “Akihime” strawberry fruits after (a) NWD and (b) CWD treatments.
Figure 7. The “P88” and “Akihime” strawberry fruits after (a) NWD and (b) CWD treatments.
Preprints 82959 g008
Figure 8. The “P88”, “Akihime” and “P80” strawberry fruits after (a) NWD+CWP and. (b) CWD+CWP treatments.
Figure 8. The “P88”, “Akihime” and “P80” strawberry fruits after (a) NWD+CWP and. (b) CWD+CWP treatments.
Preprints 82959 g009
Table 1. Sensors and connections.
Table 1. Sensors and connections.
No. Sensors Connection/Signal Number
1 Light intensity, air temperature/humidity, and Carbon Dioxide content RS485 2 sets
2 Water meter RS485 1 piece
3 Soil temperature probe Type-k thermocouple /WiFi 16 sets
4 Cold-water temperature probe Type-k thermocouple /WiFi 3 sets
5 1-phase power meter RS485 1 set
6 3-phase power meter RS485 1 set
7 Air-condition control with thermostat Thermocouple type-k 1 set
8 Water dripping with scheduling timer and water-pumping control with 220V solenoid Thermocouple type-k 1 set
9 Internet router gateway and internet sim 3G/4G/WiFi 2 sets
10 Sensor interface board using ESP8266 with RS485, I2C, SPI, and serial interface - 1 set
Table 2. Temperature and relative humidity in the evaporative greenhouse.
Table 2. Temperature and relative humidity in the evaporative greenhouse.
Months T (Max) (°C) T (Min) (°C) T (Aeverage) (°C) RH (Max)(%) RH (Min)(%) RH (Aeverage) (%)
October 31.4 17.6 23.2 90 62 83.9
November 34 18.1 21.6 91 42 83.8
December 29.3 14.9 21.1 89 53 84.2
January 23.7 13.1 18.6 90 68 83.5
Average 29.6 15.9 21.1 90 56 83.9
Table 3. CO2 concentration and light intensity in the evaporative greenhouse (07.00-16.00 o’clock).
Table 3. CO2 concentration and light intensity in the evaporative greenhouse (07.00-16.00 o’clock).
Months Co2 (Max) (ppm) Co2 (Min) (ppm) Co2 (Aeverage) (ppm) Light intensity (Max) (Lux) Light intensity (Min) (Lux) Light intensity (Average) (Lux)
October 659 408 509 51,498 538 12,040
November 745 407 519 53,087 382 15,287
December 740 407 489 46,769 48 12,565
January 549 409 461 24,338 65 11,899
Average 673 408 495 43,923 258 12,948
Table 4. Outdoor air temperature and relative humidity.
Table 4. Outdoor air temperature and relative humidity.
Months T (Max) (°C) T (Min) (°C) T (Aeverage) (°C) RH (Max) (%) RH (Min) (%) RH (Aeverage) (%)
October 34.6 16.3 25.6 98 40 84.3
November 35.2 17.1 24.9 98 41 82.1
December 33.5 12.9 23.0 99 43 82
January 31.9 10.7 20.8 98 35 75.8
Average 33.8 14.3 23.6 98 34 81
Table 6. Canopy width, leaves width, crown diameter and number of flowers in different treatments.
Table 6. Canopy width, leaves width, crown diameter and number of flowers in different treatments.
Treatments Canopy width
(cm)
Leaves width
(cm)
Crown diameter
(mm)
No. of flowers
P88 NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
28.55 d
29.71 d
29.80 d
28.81 d
7.31 c
6.71 c
7.12 c
7.17 c
15.26 cde
18.24 bcd
19.65 ab
16.35 bcde
8.62 ab
11.59 ab
10.11 ab
5.46 bc
P80 NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
38.86 abc
40.40 a
38.25 abc
34.19 bcd
7.68 bc
9.23 ab
9.32 a
7.63 bc
18.61 bcd
19.22 abc
18.92 bcd
18.51 bcd
0.00 c
0.00 c
6.18 bc
9.18 ab
Akihime NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
38.15 abc
33.20 cd
43.03 a
39.51 ab
6.81 c
6.52 c
8.00 abc
7.96 abc
14.57 de
13.86 e
23.51 a
18.55 bcd
11.20 ab
10.28 ab
15.37 a
15.30 a
A ** ** ns **
B ns Ns ** *
A x B * * * **
Note: means followed by different lowercase letters within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05, (ns = non-significant; * = significant).
Table 7. Plant height, leaves length, SPAD and number of inflorescences of three cultivars of strawberry.
Table 7. Plant height, leaves length, SPAD and number of inflorescences of three cultivars of strawberry.
Cultivars Plant Height
(cm)
Leaves length
(cm)
SPAD No. of inflorescences
P88
P80
Akihime
21.08 b
22.99 b
24.94 a
6.92 c
8.44 b
9.67 a
41.46 a
33.51 b
40.03 a
1.17 a
0.31 b
1.43 a
F-test ** ** ** **
Note: means followed by different lowercase letters within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05, (ns = non-significant; * = significant).
Table 8. Plant height, leaves length, chlorophyll content and number of inflorescences in different root-zone cooling treatments.
Table 8. Plant height, leaves length, chlorophyll content and number of inflorescences in different root-zone cooling treatments.
Treatments Plant Height (cm) leaves length (cm) Chlorophyll content (SPAD unit) No. of inflorescences
NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
22.35
22.56
23.70
23.41
8.21 ab
8.70 a
8.67 a
7.79 b
39.37
39.09
37.70
37.16
0.68 b
0.85 ab
1.25 a
1.10 ab
F-test ns * ns **
Note: means followed by different lowercase letters within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05, (ns = non-significant; * = significant).
Table 9. Strawberry fruit quality and yield in different treatments.
Table 9. Strawberry fruit quality and yield in different treatments.
Treatments Fruit weight (gram) Fruit width (mm) Fruit length (mm) Fruit firmness (kg) TSS(%Brix) Yield (gram/plant)
P88 NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
7.60 b
11.66 a
7.24 b
9.33 ab
22.84 ab
26.27 a
22.95 ab
24.34 ab
27.44 d
32.38 bcd
27.59 d
31.01 cd
0.27 de
0.30 cd
0.37 abc
0.24 def
9.08 c
10.28 abc
9.97 abc
10.28 abc
65.5
131.1
73.2
50.9
P80 NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
-
-
9.63 ab
12.04 a
-
-
24.46 ab
25.32 ab
-
-
30.06 cd
27.43 d
-
-
0.41 ab
0.41 a
-
-
10.85 ab
10.74 ab
-
-
59.5
110.5
Akihime NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
7.50 b
9.32 ab
10.04 ab
9.51 ab
22.11 b
23.71 ab
23.56 ab
22.77 b
34.01 bc
31.89 bcd
40.41 a
36.39 ab
0.15 f
0.19 ef
0.19 ef
0.33 bcd
10.62 abc
9.39 bc
11.48 a
10.37 abc
84.0
95.8
154.3
145.5
A * * * * * -
B * * * * * -
A x B * * * * * -
Note: means followed by different lowercase letters within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05, (ns = non-significant; * = significant).
Table 10. Strawberry fruit color in different treatments.
Table 10. Strawberry fruit color in different treatments.
Treatments L a B
P88 NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
34.23 d
35.89 cd
36.38 bcd
38.53 abc
31.60 b
25.30 d
26.28 d
26.17 d
15.84 bcd
15.12 cd
16.71 bc
14.22 cd
P80 NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
0.00 e
0.00 e
34.26 d
36.01 bcd
0.00 e
0.00 e
26.19 d
26.49 d
0.00 e
0.00 e
11.63 d
13.27 cd
Akihime NWD
CWD
CWD+CWP
NWD+CWP
38.65 abc
37.11 bcd
38.88 ab
40.34 a
35.13 a
27.20 cd
31.86 ab
30.54 bc
21.32 a
14.66 cd
16.20 bc
19.73 ab
A ** ** **
B ** ** **
A x B ** ** **
Note: means followed by different lowercase letters within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05, (ns = non-significant; * = significant).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated