Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Binding of YY1/CREB to an Enhancer Region Triggers Claudin 6 Expression in H. pylori LPS-Stimulated AGS Cells

Altmetrics

Downloads

102

Views

28

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

22 August 2023

Posted:

24 August 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Aberrant expression of the tight junction protein claudin 6 (CLDN6) is a hallmark of gastric can-cer progression. Its expression is regulated by the transcription factor CREB. But in H. pylo-ri-induced gastric cancer there is no information regarding what transcription factors in-duce/upregulate the expression of CLDN6. We aimed to identify if CREB and YY1 regulate the expression of CLDN6 and the site where they bind to the promoter sequence. Bioinformatics analysis, H. pylori LPS, YY1 and CREB silencing, western blot, luciferase assays, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments were performed using the gastric adenocarcinoma cell line AGS. A gen reporter assay suggested that the initial 2000 bp contains the regulatory sequence as-sociated with CLDN6 transcription; the luciferase assay demonstrated three different regions with transcriptional activity, but the -901 to -1421 bp region displayed the maximal transcrip-tional activity in response to LPS. Fragment 1279-1421 showed CREB and surprisingly YY1 oc-cupancy. Sequential ChIP experiments confirmed that YY1 and CREB interact in the 1279-1421 region. Our results suggest that CLDN6 expression is regulated by the binding of YY1 and CREB in the 901-1421 enhancer in which a non-described interaction of YY1 with CREB was established in the 1279-1421 region.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

1. Introduction

Epithelial tight junctions are dynamic structures formed by the aggregation of several different transmembrane proteins (Zonula occludens-1, occludins, junctional adhesion molecules, Marvel3, claudins) [1] that determine the barrier properties between the plasma membranes of adjacent cells [2]. Claudins are a family of 27 different proteins [3] whose homo- and heterodimeric interactions form tight junction strands in a tissue-specific combination and exert pore-forming activity [4,5]. Claudin 6 (CLDN6) expression is developmentally regulated in embryonic epithelia [6] mainly fetal stomach, lung, and kidney [7] rarely in healthy adult tissues [8]. Deregulation of CLDN6 expression and distribution has been associated with epithelial cancer progression [9] in non-small cell lung, ovarian, cervical, and breast carcinomas [10,11,12,13] but in the latter its function as a tumor-promoting or tumor suppressor gene has been recognized [14,15]. Similarly, abnormal expression of CLDN6 has been widely recognized in gastric cancer [16,17] where its expression has been clearly associated to enhanced invasiveness and metastatic properties [18,19] via well-defined transcription factors [20]. Extended exposure to H. pylori LPS increases the expression of CLDN6 in AGS cells [21].
Mongolian gerbils infected with H. Pylori show up-regulation and activation of CREB that correlate with early cellular inflammation and ulceration [22]. In silico studies reveal that CREB-mediated transcription regulates diverse cellular responses such as cell proliferation and apoptosis [23] and that claudin 6 expression is regulated by CREB amongst other transcription factors [24]. Interestingly, chronic inflammation-associated IL1b signaling regulates the expression and activation of CREB through ERK 1/2 dependent mechanisms [25] a pathway closely related to CLDN6 expression [21].
Diverse nuclear processes including enhancer-promoter interactions are regulated among others by CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) [26]. Yin Yang 1 (YY1) contributes to enhancer-promoter structural interactions; it possesses one activation and two repression domains [27]. It binds to the CGCCATNTT sequence located in many different promoters and acts as a regulator of enhancer-promoter loops analogous to DNA interactions mediated by CTCF [28]. Monomeric YY1 bound to DNA is capable of dimerizing forming DNA loops interacting directly with DNA sequences or through other proteins [29]. YY1 is a sequence-specific DNA multi-domain binding transcription factor that activates or represses genes during cell growth and differentiation [30,31], and it has a role in the control of EMT [32]. It interacts with CREB-binding protein [33] and histone deacetylase-1, -2, and -3 [27]. YY1 plays a vital biological role in remodeling and regulation of angiogenesis, tumor metabolism, and immunity in the microenvironment of a great variety of tumors, including gastric cancer [34].
The interaction of YY1 and CREB has been established in viral infections [33,35] and gastric tumors [36]. But in H. pylori-induced gastric cancer there is no information regarding what transcription factors induce/upregulate the expression of CLDN6. The aim of this paper is to identify if CREB and YY1 transcription factors regulate the expression of CLDN6 and to identify the site where they bind to the promoter sequence.

2. Results

2.1. Bioinformatic analysis.

As YY1 interacts with CREB a TFBind analysis was performed to determine all the possible YY1 and CREB binding sites in a promoter region close to the location where CLDN6 transcription is initiated; because the number of possible binding sites was extensive, we selected sites with a minimal similitude value of 0.8 for YY1 and CREB. Nine YY1 binding sites were found, but one with a similitude value of 0.9 was in a site very close to where transcription is initiated. Concerning CREB, 17 binding sites with a similitude value between 0.80 and 0.89, and 3 with a similitude value greater than 0.9 were selected. Interestingly, the luciferase assay determined that none of the 0.9 YY1 or CREB participated in the transcriptional activity after LPS stimulation.
Figure 1.- YY1 and CREB binding sites in cldn6 promoter.

2.2. H. pylori LPS and YY1/CREB expression

CLDN6 expression is enhanced by H. pylori LPS [21] nevertheless the effect of LPS upon the expression of YY1 and CREB has not been studied. Our results confirmed that LPS exposure increases significantly CLDN6 expression after 12 h reaching its peak value after 24 h (p < 0.05). Interestingly, this increase was apparently subordinated to a significant up-regulation (p < 0.01) of YY1 and CREB transcription factors that initiated 4 h after LPS exposure and reached its maximum value after 12 and 24 h (Figure 2A,B) respectively.
To determine the region that regulates CLDN6 expression, we performed a gen reporter assay using the results of the bioinformatics analysis that suggested that the initial 2000 bp contained the regulatory sequence associated with CLDN6 transcription.

2.3. Cloning of claudin 6 promoter

To evaluate the transcriptional activity of the claudin 6 promoter, three different regions were cloned in the pMetLuc2 (-2000, -1421, -901 bp) (Figure 3A). Transfected AGS cells showed, as determined by the luciferase assay that the three different regions displayed transcriptional activity which was independent of LPS presence (Figure 3B). The apparent difference in activation with and without LPS in the results of the -901 region did not reach statistically significant difference. It is worth noticing the enhanced activation of -1421 region in 48 h LPS-stimulated cells. To compare the response of the different regions adequately, normalized data were used to demonstrate that the -901 to -1421 region displayed the maximal transcriptional activity in response to LPS (Figure 3C). The difference started to be significant from 12 h and reached a peak after 24 h that maintained a plateau behavior after 48 h. Not surprisingly, the complete -2000 bp region behaved almost identically to the -1421 region from 24 h, thus suggesting that the transcriptional activity of the -901 region is not dependent on LPS stimulation.

2.4. Regulation of Claudin 6 expression

To determine the role of YY1 and CREB in claudin 6 transcription regulation, silencing experiments using specific siRNAs were done. Figure 4 A represents the silencing control experiments where efficient silencing of both transcription factors was achieved. The results showed that knocking down YY1 or CREB diminished the expression of CLDN6, as shown in Figure 4B. YY1 transcription factor regulates CLDN6 expression. Still, the results also demonstrated that YY1 has a regulatory role in CREB expression, suggesting a highly relevant function for this protein in gastric cancer. CREB silencing in LPS-treated cells significantly diminished the expression of YY1 (Figure 4B), suggesting that LPS triggers the establishment of a loop constituted by the CREB and YY1 interaction. These results were independent of LPS stimulation, and the differences against control experiments were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

2.5. Interaction of YY1/CREB in Claudin 6 promoter

As the luciferase analysis had already shown, the 901-1421 region possessed the elements that control CLDN6 expression in LPS-treated cells. The chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed YY1 and CREB occupancy sites in the 901-1018 bp fragment, the 1018-1149 fragment only had YY1 occupancy, and the 1149-1279 fragment did not show occupancy signals for any of both transcription factors; these sites corresponded to those predicted by the bioinformatic analysis. The fragment 1279-1421 showed CREB occupancy as predicted, but surprisingly YY1 occupancy was also demonstrated despite not being predicted by the bioinformatic analysis (Figure 5).
Because of the surprising presence of a YY1 occupancy site in 1279-1421 we looked for possible YY1 binding sites with a minimal similitude value of 0.5 onwards in this region; the analysis did not show a putative binding site. Because ample bibliographic information validates the spatial interaction of both proteins, we performed sequential ChIP experiments in all three regions to determine if the presence of YY1 in the 1279-1421 region is secondary to its interaction with CREB. The results confirmed, as expected, that YY1 and CREB interact in the 1279-1421 region, thus confirming our hypothesis (Figure 6).

3. Discussion

Claudins, a large family of transmembrane structural proteins, are fundamental to tight junction function and regulation linked to associated regulatory and scaffolding proteins [38]. They exhibit cell type-specific and tissue-specific expression patterns [39]. Still, post-translational modifications can alter tight junction protein binding events and barrier function [40]. The fetal stomach tissue expresses CLDN6, which is developmentally regulated in mouse embryonic epithelium and is one of the earliest proteins expressed in embryonic stem cells committed to the epithelial fate [6,7], CLDN6 expression in breast cancer is regulated by transcription factors such as HIF-1a, FoxA2, Gata6, and TTF-1 [41,42] at the claudin 6 promoter [43]. CLDN6 expression is significantly upregulated in different types of cancer, including gastric cancer [17,44,45]. CLDN6 overexpression in the gastric adenocarcinoma cell line AGS has proved to play a significant role in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [18,19], but very little is known about the transcription factors that regulate CLDN6 expression.
A previous analysis of claudin expression in the AGS cell line suggested that the transcription factors CREB and YY1 could be regulators of CLDN6. The bioinformatics analysis results showed that CREB and YY1 have 17 and 9, respectively, probable binding site 2000 bp upstream of the site where transcription of claudin 6 is initiated. Our results confirmed that H. pylori LPS induced, in the context of a chronic inflammatory process, the expression of CLDN6 in the AGS cell line [21]. Still, it also induced the expression of CREB and YY1 protein. The results of a Pearson correlation analysis between these transcription factors and CLDN6 expression suggested that both proteins, YY1 and CREB, could be associated with CLDN6 expression.
YY1 is a zinc finger protein that can activate or repress transcription depending on its interactions with other transcription factors [46,47,48] such as the nuclear protein CBP that is a coactivator for the transcription factor CREB [49]. CREB is strongly associated with inflammation and progression genes [50], and YY1, which is upregulated in the AGS cell line, is associated with gastric cancer progression [51]. Nevertheless, there is no information regarding the DNA region where these transcription factors bind.
Bacterial LPS regulates gene transcription by binding YY1 complexes to C/EBP1 or lncRNA via inflammatory cytokines [52,53]. Our results showed that the presence of CREB is indispensable for its interaction with YY1. The triggering mechanism in our model is highly likely mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by H. pylori LPS. lL-1b and TNFa regulate gene transcription via the C/EBP1, C/EBP2, and YY1 elements in epithelial cells [54]. YY1 function is regulated through the IL-4/STAT6 signaling pathway in tumor associated immune cells [55].
To identify the specific regulatory regions of the 2000 bp promoter regions where CREB and YY1 binding sites were found, the complete promoter region and two fragments were cloned in the pMetLuc2 vector and evaluated via a luciferase activity assay. The results suggested that 2 CREB sites and 2 YY1 sites in the DNA fragment corresponding to the 901bp-1421bp region are significantly important for regulating the claudin 6 gene. The ChIP assays confirmed the results and revealed a YY1 binding site in the 1279-1421 bp region not predicted by the bioinformatics analysis. The distance between these CREB and YY1 sites was identified, suggesting that the 1279-1421 region is an enhancer [56]. Gene expression is a precisely controlled process where enhancers function in a tissue-specific manner [57]. Enhancers in higher eukaryotes are physically separated along the genome from the target gene promoters, and there are three possibilities for enhancer-promoter communication: tracking, linking, and looping [58]. YY1 is known to interact with DNA in a monomeric or a dimeric manner through its zinc fingers but also bridging with other transcription co-factors (ref). Our results strongly suggest that the binding of YY1 with CREB mediates the formation of a “loop” and thus initiate claudin 6 transcription, but the precise mechanism remains to be solved. YY1 has been recognized as a structural regulator of enhancer-promoter loops [28]. YY1 and CREB binding has been confirmed in the fourth exon of lymphotoxin-b in chromosome 6p21 in Jurkat T cells [59].
The mechanism by which YY1 functions both as a transcriptional activator and repressor depends in its acetylation/deacetylation [27]. Still, it is likely that the proteins and sequence-specific DNA-binding transcriptional activators and coregulatory molecules, such as CREB, with which YY1 interact determine its function [29,60]. Our results advocate that the interaction of YY1 with CREB in AGS cells stimulated with H. pylori LPS is involved in the transcriptional initiation and activation of claudin 6, a perfectly defined tight junction protein associated with enhanced gastric cancer progression and invasiveness [19].
Our results suggest that CLDN6 expression, a protein associated with gastric epithelial cancer progression, is regulated by the binding of YY1 and CREB in the 901-1421 enhancer in which a non-described interaction of YY1 with CREB was established in the 1279-1421 region.

4. Materials and Methods

Reagents

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine, sodium pyruvate, insulin, Dulbecco´s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS), streptomycin-penicillin, bovine albumin, and total antibody compensation beads were from Invitrogen (Life Technologies Corp, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Monoclonal anti-claudin-6 (sc-393671), anti-YY1 (sc-7341), anti-GAPDH (sc-47724), anti-actin (sc-32251), and goat anti-mouse IgG were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Monoclonal anti-CREB (MA1-083) and Lipofectamine 2000 (11668027) were from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Molecular Biology Kit, EZ-10 Spin Column Plasmid DNA Miniprep Kit was from Southern Labware (Cumming, GA, USA). Ready-to-Glow secreted luciferase reporter assay (Cat # 631727) and pMetLuc2 reporter vector (Cat # 631729) were from Takara Bio USA (San Jose, CA, USA). Primers were designed using TFBIND [37] and were synthetized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, Iowa, USA). T4 DNA ligase (cat #M0202S) was from New England BioLabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). The chromatin immunoprecipitation EZ-ChIP (cat #17-371) was from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Ruby Hot Start Master (2x) (cat # PCR-165L) was from Jena Bioscience GmbH (Jena, Germany).

Cell culture

Human gastric adenocarcinoma (AGS) (CRL-1739, ATCC, USA) cells (1x106) were cultured in sterile P-100 Petri dishes with DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS, 0.1 U/ml insulin, 1% streptomycin-penicillin solution, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, and 2 mmol sodium pyruvate solution at 37°C in a humid environment containing 5%CO2, until reaching >90% confluence. Luciferase experiments were performed with 8x105 cells/well seeded in 6 well Tissue Culture Plates (Biocompare, San Francisco, CA, USA) for 48 h until they reached 90% confluence, that represent 1x106 cells/well. LPS-treatment of AGS cells were performed in p-100 culture dishes once they reached 80-90% confluence. All the experiments were immediately performed with this confluent AGS cell cultures in their third passage.

Bioinformatic analysis

The search for sequences with potential transcriptional relevance in the present study was performed with TFBIND (tfbind.hgc.jp). We used a 0.8 cut-off instead of 0.5 value for both transcription factors.

YY1 and CREB silencing

Specific YY1 and CREB small interfering RNAs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, siRNAYY1 sc-36864, siRNACREB sc-35111) were used to transfect AGS cells. 3×105 cells were seeded in 6 well culture plates with 10% SFB supplemented antibiotic-free DMEM for 40 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere until an 80% confluence was reached. Cells were transfected with the YY1 or CREB siRNA following the manufacturer´s protocol and cultured in transfection media for a 6 h period at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere followed by 20 h incubation in DMEM. At the end culture media was eliminated from the wells, and 2 ml of 1% streptomycin-penicillin solution and 10% FBS supplemented DMEM were added per well to the transfected cells that were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a humid 5% CO2 atmosphere before extracting total cell protein. A Western blot analysis was performed to corroborate the silencing of YY1 and CREB at the protein level.

Preparation of LPS Helicobacter pylori and exposure to AGS cells.

Helicobacter pylori (strain J99) LPS (kindly donated by Dr. Victor R. Coria, Instituto Nacional de Pediatria, México). AGS cells were treated with 10 ng/ml LPS H. pylori for 4h, 8h, 12h, 24h, and 48h.

Protein extraction

Control, LPS-treated and transcription factors silenced AGS cells were washed twice with PBS and scraped with1 ml ice-cold lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl/50 mM Tris/1 mM EGTA/1 mM EDTA/1% IGEPAL/0.1% Sodium deoxycholate/0.1% SDS + protease and phosphatases inhibitors). Cell suspensions were sonicated for 1 min at 25% amplitude followed by a 30 min at 17,000g (4 °C) centrifugation. The supernatants were recovered, and a Bio-Rad Protein Assay determined the total protein concentration (Cat. # 500-0009, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Western blot

For Western blot analysis, 20 µg of protein was resolved on 13% SDS/PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes in a Bio-Rad semi-dry blotting system for 1 h at 120 mA. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 1 h, washed twice with TBS, and incubated with the relevant primary antibody diluted in Tween 20/TBS (TTBS) overnight at 4 °C (anti claudin-6 (1:200), anti-YY1 (1:400), anti-CREB (1:500), anti-GAPDH (1:5000), and anti α-actin (1:500)). Membranes were washed with TTBS and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labelled secondary goat anti-mouse IgG (1:4000), diluted in TTBS for 1 h at room temperature. Afterward, membranes were washed thrice with TTBS and once with TBS before antibody binding was detected by chemiluminescence using the Pierce kit (Supersignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate) as substrate. Equal protein loading was confirmed in all the experiments by determining β-actin as a loading control. All experiments were done in triplicate. The quantitative analysis of the Western blot bands was performed using ImageJ software that calculates the intensity of the gel band, measuring the amount of pixels/sq.in. The values were determined for each band. The results are expressed as dots per point (DPP) and intensity.

Plasmid construction and luciferase assay

The -2000, -1421 and -901 regions of the claudin 6 promoter were amplified from AGS genomic DNA using the following primers: -2000 forward: 5´CCAGCCGGTGATCTAGTCC3´, -1421 forward: 5´GCCACTACAGCTTTGTTAAGGG3´ 901 forward 5´CGGGCACCTGTAGTAGTCC3´. We use the same reverse primer: 5´AATTCCTAGGCCGAGTGTCG3´. The amplified DNA was cloned in pMetLuc2 plasmid using DNA ligase T4, the result of this ligation was used to transform competent E. coli DH5α to get transformed colonies. Plasmid DNA was extracted using Southern Labware EZ-10 Molecular Biology Kit, according to the manufacturer´s instructions. The purified DNA was used to transfect AGS cells using lipofectamine 2000; these transfected AGS cells were treated with H. pylori LPS 10 ng/mL for 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48h. Luciferase activity was measured using the Ready-to-Glow secreted luciferase reporter assay (Clontech Lab, Mountain View, CA, USA) in a Perkin Elmer Wallac 1420 Victor Spectrophotometer. The values obtained in these experiments were normalized according to Schagat T. of Promega Corporation (Cell Notes Issue 17, 2007).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

ChIP assay was performed using Millipore EZ-ChIP kit (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, AGS cells were treated with H. pylori LPS 10 ng/mL for 24 h, before being fixed with 3.7 % formaldehyde, lysed and sonicated, as previously mentioned. Immunoprecipitation was then performed with CREB and YY1 antibodies and purified DNA fragments were analysed by qPCR using Ruby Hot Start Master (2x) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following primers were used: 901-1018 forward: 5´GCACTACAGCTTTGTTAAGGG3´, reverse: 5´CACTACCACGCCCGGCTAAC3´, 1018-1149 forward: GTTAGCCGGGCGTGGTAGTGGGC, reverse: CGCCCAGTCTGGAGTGCAATGG, 1149-1279 forward: CCATTGCACTCCAGACTGGGCG, reverse: TTTCCTGACCTCGTGATCTGCCC, and 1279-1421 forward: GGGCAGATCACGAGGTCAGGAAA, reverse: GGGACTACTACAGGTGCCCG. The results of these assays were analysed in a 3.5% agarose gel and the quantitative analysis of the bands images was performed using ImageJ software that calculates the intensity of the gel band measuring the amount of pixels/sq.in. The values were determined for each band. The results are expressed as dots per point (DPP) and intensity.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software, version 4 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA). All values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance in a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc Dunett test, selected pairs comparison test, was set at P<0.05 (*), P<0.01 (**), or P<0.001 (***) versus the control condition, and “n” represents the number of independent experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Figure S1: title; Table S1: title; Video S1: title.

Author Contributions

study conception and design: Jorge H. Romero-Estrada and Erika P. Rendón-Huerta; material preparation and data collection: Jorge H. Romero-Estrada; analysis and interpretation of results: Jorge H. Romero-Estrada and Erika P. Rendón-Huerta; draft manuscript preparation: all authors. All the authors commented, reviewed the results, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPITT), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, grant number IN218019 to Dr. Erika P. Rendón-Huerta.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moonwiriyakit, A.; Pathomthongtaweechai, N.; Steinhagen, P.R.; Chantawichitwong, P.; Satianrapapong, W.; Pongkorpsakol, P. Tight junctions: from molecules to gastrointestinal diseases. Tissue Barriers 2023, 11, 2077620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morita, K.; Furuse, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Tsukita, S. Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Van Itallie, C.M.; Anderson, J.M. Claudins and epithelial paracellular transport. Annu Rev Physiol 2006, 68, 403–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krause, G.; Winkler, L.; Mueller, S.L.; Haseloff, R.F.; Piontek, J.; Blasig, I.E. Structure and function of claudins. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008, 1778, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Colegio, O.R.; Van Itallie, C.; Rahner, C.; Anderson, J.M. Claudin extracellular domains determine paracellular charge selectivity and resistance but not tight junction fibril architecture. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003, 284, C1346–C1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Turksen, K.; Troy, T.C. Claudin-6: a novel tight junction molecule is developmentally regulated in mouse embryonic epithelium. Dev Dyn 2001, 222, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ben-David, U.; Nudel, N.; Benvenisty, N. Immunologic and chemical targeting of the tight-junction protein Claudin-6 eliminates tumorigenic human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 2013, 4, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Du, H.; Yang, X.; Fan, J.; Du, X. Claudin 6: Therapeutic prospects for tumours, and mechanisms of expression and regulation (Review). Mol Med Rep 2021, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bhat, A.A.; Uppada, S.; Achkar, I.W.; Hashem, S.; Yadav, S.K.; Shanmugakonar, M.; Al-Naemi, H.A.; Haris, M.; Uddin, S. Tight Junction Proteins and Signaling Pathways in Cancer and Inflammation: A Functional Crosstalk. Front Physiol 2018, 9, 1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Han, Z.G.; Shan, L. Low claudin-6 expression correlates with poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2015, 8, 1971–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ito, Y.; Takasawa, A.; Takasawa, K.; Murakami, T.; Akimoto, T.; Kyuno, D.; Kawata, Y.; Shano, K.; Kirisawa, K.; Ota, M.; et al. Aberrant expression of claudin-6 contributes to malignant potentials and drug resistance of cervical adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci 2022, 113, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, L.; Jin, X.; Lin, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Yang, M.; Li, J.; et al. Clinicopathologic significance of claudin-6, occludin, and matrix metalloproteinases -2 expression in ovarian carcinoma. Diagn Pathol 2013, 8, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guo, Y.; Xu, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 is associated with the effect of claudin-6 in breast cancer. Diagn Pathol 2012, 7, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, Y.; Jin, X.; Li, Y.; Ruan, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yang, M.; Lin, D.; Song, P.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, S.; et al. DNA methylation of claudin-6 promotes breast cancer cell migration and invasion by recruiting MeCP2 and deacetylating H3Ac and H4Ac. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2016, 35, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Shen, X.; Ruan, Y.; Lu, Y.; Jin, X.; Song, P.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qu, H.; et al. CLDN6 promotes chemoresistance through GSTP1 in human breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2017, 36, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, L.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Yang, M.; Jin, X.; et al. The distinct expression patterns of claudin-2, -6, and -11 between human gastric neoplasms and adjacent non-neoplastic tissues. Diagn Pathol 2013, 8, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kohmoto, T.; Masuda, K.; Shoda, K.; Takahashi, R.; Ujiro, S.; Tange, S.; Ichikawa, D.; Otsuji, E.; Imoto, I. Claudin-6 is a single prognostic marker and functions as a tumor-promoting gene in a subgroup of intestinal type gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2020, 23, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zavala-Zendejas, V.E.; Torres-Martinez, A.C.; Salas-Morales, B.; Fortoul, T.I.; Montano, L.F.; Rendon-Huerta, E.P. Claudin-6, 7, or 9 overexpression in the human gastric adenocarcinoma cell line AGS increases its invasiveness, migration, and proliferation rate. Cancer Invest 2011, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Torres-Martinez, A.C.; Gallardo-Vera, J.F.; Lara-Holguin, A.N.; Montano, L.F.; Rendon-Huerta, E.P. Claudin-6 enhances cell invasiveness through claudin-1 in AGS human adenocarcinoma gastric cancer cells. Exp Cell Res 2017, 350, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Medrano-Gonzalezl, P.A.; Cruz-Villegas, F.; Alarcon Del Carmen, A.; Montano, L.F.; Rendon-Huerta, E.P. Claudin-6 increases SNAI1, NANOG and SOX2 gene expression in human gastric adenocarcinoma AGS cells. Mol Biol Rep 2022, 49, 11663–11674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chavarria-Velazquez, C.O.; Torres-Martinez, A.C.; Montano, L.F.; Rendon-Huerta, E.P. TLR2 activation induced by H. pylori LPS promotes the differential expression of claudin-4, -6, -7 and -9 via either STAT3 and ERK1/2 in AGS cells. Immunobiology 2018, 223, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kudo, T.; Lu, H.; Wu, J.Y.; Ohno, T.; Wu, M.J.; Genta, R.M.; Graham, D.Y.; Yamaoka, Y. Pattern of transcription factor activation in Helicobacter pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 1024–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Andrisani, O.M. CREB-mediated transcriptional control. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 1999, 9, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lin, D.; Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Ruan, Y.; Zhang, M.; Jin, X.; Yang, M.; Lu, Y.; Song, P.; Zhao, S.; et al. Bioinformatic analysis reveals potential properties of human Claudin-6 regulation and functions. Oncol Rep 2017, 38, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Resende, C.; Regalo, G.; Duraes, C.; Pinto, M.T.; Wen, X.; Figueiredo, C.; Carneiro, F.; Machado, J.C. Interleukin-1B signalling leads to increased survival of gastric carcinoma cells through a CREB-C/EBPbeta-associated mechanism. Gastric Cancer 2016, 19, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.; Yu, N.K.; Kaang, B.K. CTCF as a multifunctional protein in genome regulation and gene expression. Exp Mol Med 2015, 47, e166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yao, Y.L.; Yang, W.M.; Seto, E. Regulation of transcription factor YY1 by acetylation and deacetylation. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21, 5979–5991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weintraub, A.S.; Li, C.H.; Zamudio, A.V.; Sigova, A.A.; Hannett, N.M.; Day, D.S.; Abraham, B.J.; Cohen, M.A.; Nabet, B.; Buckley, D.L.; et al. YY1 Is a Structural Regulator of Enhancer-Promoter Loops. Cell 2017, 171, 1573–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sarvagalla, S.; Kolapalli, S.P.; Vallabhapurapu, S. The Two Sides of YY1 in Cancer: A Friend and a Foe. Front Oncol 2019, 9, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, Z.; Cao, P.; Wan, M.M.; Sui, G. Yin Yang 1: a multifaceted protein beyond a transcription factor. Transcription 2010, 1, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, F.; Sun, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H. YY1 in Cell Differentiation and Tissue Development. Crit Rev Oncog 2017, 22, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bonavida, B.; Baritaki, S. The novel role of Yin Yang 1 in the regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in cancer via the dysregulated NF-kappaB/Snail/YY1/RKIP/PTEN Circuitry. Crit Rev Oncog 2011, 16, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, Q.; Engel, D.A. Adenovirus E1A243 disrupts the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex at the mouse c-fos promoter. J Virol 1995, 69, 7402–7409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, M.; Wei, J.; Xue, C.; Zhou, X.; Chen, S.; Zheng, L.; Duan, Y.; Deng, H.; Xiong, W.; Tang, F.; et al. Dissecting the roles and clinical potential of YY1 in the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol 2023, 13, 1122110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Huang, W.H.; Mai, R.T.; Lee, Y.H. Transcription factor YY1 and its associated acetyltransferases CBP and p300 interact with hepatitis delta antigens and modulate hepatitis delta virus RNA replication. J Virol 2008, 82, 7313–7324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bhaskar Rao, D.; Panneerpandian, P.; Balakrishnan, K.; Ganesan, K. YY1 regulated transcription-based stratification of gastric tumors and identification of potential therapeutic candidates. J Cell Commun Signal 2021, 15, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsunoda, T.; Takagi, T. Estimating transcription factor bindability on DNA. Bioinformatics 1999, 15, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gunzel, D.; Fromm, M. Claudins and other tight junction proteins. Compr Physiol 2012, 2, 1819–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsukita, S.; Tanaka, H.; Tamura, A. The Claudins: From Tight Junctions to Biological Systems. Trends Biochem Sci 2019, 44, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Van Itallie, C.M.; Anderson, J.M. Phosphorylation of tight junction transmembrane proteins: Many sites, much to do. Tissue Barriers 2018, 6, e1382671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jimenez, F.R.; Lewis, J.B.; Belgique, S.T.; Wood, T.T.; Reynolds, P.R. Developmental lung expression and transcriptional regulation of claudin-6 by TTF-1, Gata-6, and FoxA2. Respir Res 2014, 15, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jia, Y.; Guo, Y.; Jin, Q.; Qu, H.; Qi, D.; Song, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, W.; Dong, Y.; et al. A SUMOylation-dependent HIF-1alpha/CLDN6 negative feedback mitigates hypoxia-induced breast cancer metastasis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2020, 39, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jimenez, F.R.; Lewis, J.B.; Belgique, S.T.; Milner, D.C.; Lewis, A.L.; Dunaway, T.M.; Egbert, K.M.; Winden, D.R.; Arroyo, J.A.; Reynolds, P.R. Cigarette smoke and decreased oxygen tension inhibit pulmonary claudin-6 expression. Exp Lung Res 2016, 42, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qu, H.; Jin, Q.; Quan, C. CLDN6: From Traditional Barrier Function to Emerging Roles in Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2021, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gao, F.; Li, M.; Xiang, R.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhai, Y. Expression of CLDN6 in tissues of gastric cancer patients: Association with clinical pathology and prognosis. Oncol Lett 2019, 17, 4621–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shi, Y.; Seto, E.; Chang, L.S.; Shenk, T. Transcriptional repression by YY1, a human GLI-Kruppel-related protein, and relief of repression by adenovirus E1A protein. Cell 1991, 67, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Seto, E.; Shi, Y.; Shenk, T. YY1 is an initiator sequence-binding protein that directs and activates transcription in vitro. Nature 1991, 354, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khachigian, L.M. The Yin and Yang of YY1 in tumor growth and suppression. Int J Cancer 2018, 143, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kwok, R.P.; Lundblad, J.R.; Chrivia, J.C.; Richards, J.P.; Bachinger, H.P.; Brennan, R.G.; Roberts, S.G.; Green, M.R.; Goodman, R.H. Nuclear protein CBP is a coactivator for the transcription factor CREB. Nature 1994, 370, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Steven, A.; Seliger, B. Control of CREB expression in tumors: from molecular mechanisms and signal transduction pathways to therapeutic target. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 35454–35465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kang, W.; Tong, J.H.; Chan, A.W.; Zhao, J.; Dong, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, W.; Sin, F.M.; Ng, S.S.; Yu, J.; et al. Yin Yang 1 contributes to gastric carcinogenesis and its nuclear expression correlates with shorter survival in patients with early stage gastric adenocarcinoma. J Transl Med 2014, 12, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nakayama, Y.; Kobayashi, R.; Iwai, Y.; Noda, K.; Yamazaki, M.; Kurita-Ochiai, T.; Yoshimura, A.; Ganss, B.; Ogata, Y. C/EBPbeta and YY1 bind and interact with Smad3 to modulate lipopolysaccharide-induced amelotin gene transcription in mouse gingival epithelial cells. FEBS Open Bio 2019, 9, 276–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Ni, C.; Zhen, Y.; Xu, R.; Liu, Q.; et al. Enterobacterial LPS-inducible LINC00152 is regulated by histone lactylation and promotes cancer cells invasion and migration. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022, 12, 913815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Noda, K.; Yamazaki, M.; Iwai, Y.; Matsui, S.; Kato, A.; Takai, H.; Nakayama, Y.; Ogata, Y. IL-1beta and TNF-alpha regulate mouse amelotin gene transcription in gingival epithelial cells. J Oral Sci 2018, 60, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chen, S.; Lu, K.; Hou, Y.; You, Z.; Shu, C.; Wei, X.; Wu, T.; Shi, N.; Zhang, G.; Wu, J.; et al. YY1 complex in M2 macrophage promotes prostate cancer progression by upregulating IL-6. J Immunother Cancer 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Spitz, F.; Furlong, E.E. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mercola, M.; Wang, X.F.; Olsen, J.; Calame, K. Transcriptional enhancer elements in the mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain locus. Science 1983, 221, 663–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Panigrahi, A.; O'Malley, B.W. Mechanisms of enhancer action: the known and the unknown. Genome Biol 2021, 22, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wicks, K.; Knight, J.C. Transcriptional repression and DNA looping associated with a novel regulatory element in the final exon of the lymphotoxin-beta gene. Genes Immun 2011, 12, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, J.S.; Galvin, K.M.; See, R.H.; Eckner, R.; Livingston, D.; Moran, E.; Shi, Y. Relief of YY1 transcriptional repression by adenovirus E1A is mediated by E1A-associated protein p300. Genes Dev 1995, 9, 1188–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 83092 g001
Figure 1. TFBind software was used to select putative binding sites for YY1 and CREB transcription factors based on a minimal similitude score of 0.8. Location refers to the position of the initial nucleotide in the identified sequence. Signal lists the sequence in cldn6 promoter where there is a high probability that the transcription factors bind.
Figure 1. TFBind software was used to select putative binding sites for YY1 and CREB transcription factors based on a minimal similitude score of 0.8. Location refers to the position of the initial nucleotide in the identified sequence. Signal lists the sequence in cldn6 promoter where there is a high probability that the transcription factors bind.
Preprints 83092 g001
Preprints 83092 g002
Figure 2. AGS cells were exposed to 10 ng/ml of H. pylori LPS and the expression of CLDN6, YY1 and CREB was evaluated at different time intervals. All the experiments were performed in triplicates. The difference in expression was determined using ANOVA and Dunnett test. *, **, and *** represent the 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 p value, respectively.
Figure 2. AGS cells were exposed to 10 ng/ml of H. pylori LPS and the expression of CLDN6, YY1 and CREB was evaluated at different time intervals. All the experiments were performed in triplicates. The difference in expression was determined using ANOVA and Dunnett test. *, **, and *** represent the 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 p value, respectively.
Preprints 83092 g002
Preprints 83092 g003
Figure 3. AGS cells were exposed to 10 ng/ml of H. pylori LPS and the transcriptional activity of the CLDN6 promoter was determined in A) different regions cloned in the pMetLuc2 vector, B) transcriptional activity in relative units (RLU) in the cloned regions, the values did not reach statistical significance, C) normalized RLU data of the results showed a significant difference in transcriptional activity between the -901 and the -1421 region as from 12 h of LPS exposure. All the experiments were performed in triplicates. The difference in expression was determined using ANOVA and Dunnett test. **, and *** represent the 0.01 and 0.001 p-values, respectively.
Figure 3. AGS cells were exposed to 10 ng/ml of H. pylori LPS and the transcriptional activity of the CLDN6 promoter was determined in A) different regions cloned in the pMetLuc2 vector, B) transcriptional activity in relative units (RLU) in the cloned regions, the values did not reach statistical significance, C) normalized RLU data of the results showed a significant difference in transcriptional activity between the -901 and the -1421 region as from 12 h of LPS exposure. All the experiments were performed in triplicates. The difference in expression was determined using ANOVA and Dunnett test. **, and *** represent the 0.01 and 0.001 p-values, respectively.
Preprints 83092 g003
Preprints 83092 g004
Figure 4. Specific siRNA for YY1 and CREB were used to silence their expression in H. pylori LPS-treated AGS cells. A Scramble siRNA was used as a negative control. The quantitative expression of the results is shown as histograms. All the experiments were performed in triplicates.
Figure 4. Specific siRNA for YY1 and CREB were used to silence their expression in H. pylori LPS-treated AGS cells. A Scramble siRNA was used as a negative control. The quantitative expression of the results is shown as histograms. All the experiments were performed in triplicates.
Preprints 83092 g004
Preprints 83092 g005
Figure 5. A) shows the putative binding sites of YY1 and CREB in the 901-1421 region; B) CHIP assay corroborating the occupancy sites and the presence of a non-predicted YY1 site in the 1279-1421 region; C) histograms presenting the relative signal quantification compared to the control (input). All the experiments were performed in triplicates.
Figure 5. A) shows the putative binding sites of YY1 and CREB in the 901-1421 region; B) CHIP assay corroborating the occupancy sites and the presence of a non-predicted YY1 site in the 1279-1421 region; C) histograms presenting the relative signal quantification compared to the control (input). All the experiments were performed in triplicates.
Preprints 83092 g005
Preprints 83092 g006
Figure 6. Confirmation of YY1 and CREB interaction in the 1279-1421 region by sequential CHIP assays. All the experiments were performed in triplicates.
Figure 6. Confirmation of YY1 and CREB interaction in the 1279-1421 region by sequential CHIP assays. All the experiments were performed in triplicates.
Preprints 83092 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated