1. Introduction
In this paper, we consider the existence and uniqueness of mild solutions to the following nonlinear fractional integro-differential diffusion equations with nonlocal initial conditions:
where
,
,
and
are the
order partial Caputo derivative and
order partial Riemann-Liouville integral with respect to
t.
, which is given in
Section 2,
with smooth boundary
,
, the nonlinear term
f and the nonlocal term
g are given functions. The coefficient linear operator
A is defined by:
where
are some real valued functions in
satisfying conditions:
with some constants
,
is also a real valued function satisfying
where
denotes the space composed of measurable functions defined on
and almost bounded everywhere.
Fractional differential equations originated in 1695, see [
1,
2,
3]. As we have known that they can provide such excellent descriptive models to resolve various problems in reality, to the extent that they are applied in various fields, such as control engineering [
4,
5], viscoelastic materials [
6], fluid mechanics [
7], electrochemistry [
8], the analysis of epidemic [
9] and complex networks [
10], and statistical mechanics [
11], etc. The relevant problems for the diffusion equations have been studied by many scholars, see [
12,
13,
14] and recent relevant references [
15,
16,
17].
The existence results to nonlocal initial problems in Banach space was initiated by Byszewski and Lakshmikantham [
18]. The motivation for these studies is that the nonlocal condition is better to describe the diffusion phenomenon than using the usual local Cauchy problem
. For example,
can be given by
where
are given constants and
. In addition, for some applications of nonlocal conditions, please refer to [
19,
20,
21,
22,
23].
Fractional equations containing only differential terms have been studied widely. For instance, in [
24], Mu et al. considered the initial-boundary value problem of fractional diffusion equations in Caputo sense:
where
f is weighted H
lder continuous. The existence, uniqueness and regularity of solutions of (
3) be established in
with some assumptions. Nevertheless, a lot of practical phenomena can be depicted via appropriate models, which include differential and integral terms. Hence the appearance of integro-differential equations shows that their excellent applicability in some physical or engineering areas. In [
25], Amin et al. obtained the solutions of a integro-differential equation with initial condition
where
,
W is the kernel of integral,
and
are known. This integral term has certain limitations when describing nonlocal diffusion phenomena, and the applicability of the initial condition is also relatively weak.
According to our knowledge, the mild solutions of fractional differential equations are usually represented by the Mittag-Leffler function or probability density function, see [
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32]. In [
32], Zhou et al. obtained a mild solution, where
is the probability density function defined on
and
is a
-semigroup generated by
A. On the other hand, if
, then a formal solution of (
1) is
Where
is the eigenfunction related to the eigenvalue
of the corresponding eigenvalue problem, that is,
,
, see further details in [
29]. Obviously, using these technique directly to solve the problem (
1) is quite difficult.
Based on the above, in this paper we apply the
-resolvent family to discuss the mild solutions. Resolvent families are powerful for studying solutions to fractional diffusion equations. Chen et al. [
33] established the existence and controllability estimation of mild solutions for a class of evolution equations with nonlocal conditions through a resolvent family. Ponce [
23] obtained properties on the behavior of mild solutions for fraction Cauchy problems by a resolvent family. Later, Chang et al. [
19] proved that if the source function of a diffusion equation has vector value periodicity or almost periodicity or almost automorphism, then the diffusion equation has a mild solution through a resolvent family. Although there is also an integral of
f in [
19], some of the proof techniques in which are not applicable to this article due to the derivative order of
u being different.
This paper is organized as follows. In
Section 2, by selecting the appropriate space, we transform (
1) into an abstract Cauchy problem and provide some necessary definitions and preliminary results that will be used in the sequel. Afterwards, we define the mild solutions for (
9) by Laplace transform. In
Section 3, the existence and uniqueness of the mild solutions be established by several fixed point theorems under some assumptions.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we provide some definitions and lemmas about fractional calculus and the -resolvent family that will be used in this paper.
Definition 1 ([
2]). The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order
with respect to
t for an integrable function
is defined as
where
is the Gamma function.
Definition 2 ([
2]). The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order
with respect to
t for an absolutely continuous function
is defined as
Definition 3 ([
2]). The Caputo fractional derivative of order
with respect to
t for an absolutely continuous function
can be written as
If
and
is continuously differentiable, then
If
f is an abstract function with values in a Banach space, then the integrals and derivatives appearing in (
5) and (
7) are understood in Bochner’s sense.
Definition 4 ([
34]). Let
P be a metric space, and let
be a bounded set. The Kuratowski measure of noncompactness is defined by:
Lemma 5 ([
35]).
Let E be a Banach space, and S, , be some subsets of E. Then we have the following properties :
(i) is relatively compact;
(ii) ;
(iii) ;
(iv) , where ;
(v) , , where ;
(vi) .
Let
with the norm
and
. Here
represents the dual space of
, which is the closure of
in
,
consists of the functions in
with compact support,
is the Sobolev space (see [
36]).
denotes the Banach space of all continuous functions from
J into
X with the norm
Similarly,
denotes all continuous functions from
J into
with the norm
We define
with
and
. Then according to [
37],
A generates an analytic semigroup
on
X. Without loss of generality, we can assume that
,
is uniformly bounded, and there exists a constant
such that
Denote
and
are the resolvent set and resolvent operator of
A, respectively, where
I is the identity operator. By [
38], there exist
and
such that
and
Set
,
, where
, then (
1) can be formulated as an abstract problem with nonlocal initial conditions:
where
and
denote the
order Caputo derivative and
order Riemann-Liouville integral, respectively.
,
and
.
Definition 6. If
A generates a uniformly bounded and analytic semigroup, which satisfies (
10) and (
11), and for operator-valued function
we have
then
is called the
resolvent family generated by
A.
It can be seen from the reference [
24,
31] that the following results can be obtained.
Remark 1.
Let and satisfy
and
Then
where is a probability density function defined on which satisfies
, are the Mittag-Leffler functions [2].
If is a solution of
then
Remark 2.
Assume that is the resolvent family generated by A. Because the inverse Laplace transform of is , by (14) and the convolution theorem of Laplace transform, we have
Lemma 7. If A generates a uniformly bounded and analytic semigroup, which satisfies (10) and (11), then
(i) There exist and a constant such that
and
(ii) A generates a resolvent family , and
, and . Moreover,
is a constant.
Proof. (i) Let
,
with
and
, then
Thus
, and
where
is a constant.
(ii) For
, and
, we set
where
are oriented counterclockwise. From (
16) it is easy to see that for
the integral in (
18) converges in the uniform topology. Moreover,
Similarly, the integral on
has the same estimation and on
we get
Hence, (
17) holds.
Next we fix
, we have
where the Cauchy integral formula and Fubini theorem are also used. Due to
Therefore, by taking the limit as
in (
19), we have
That is,
is generated by
A. □
Remark 3. Due to different parameters, the method in [19] cannot be directly applied to this paper. By comparing the forms of mild solutions to the studied equations, we find that (17) agrees well with in [24].
Lemma 8. For , is continuous in the uniform operator topology, where is the resolvent family generated by A.
Proof. Let
be fixed. Due to the fact that
is continuous in the uniform operator topology for
[
39], for arbitrary
, there exists
such that
for
, and
.
Then, owing to
and
where
is the Beta function [
2], we conclude that
That is, by the arbitrariness of
,
is continuous in the uniform operator topology for
. □
Remark 4.
is strongly continuous. That is, for arbitrary and , we have
Proof. Since
is strongly continuous [
40], there exist
such that
for
, and
.
Due to
we obtain that
is strongly continuous. □
It is noteworthy that the strongly continuity of can not be obtained immediately by Lemma 8, in which , not .
Lemma 9. If the analytic semigroup generated by A is compact, then is compact for .
Proof. Set
. In order to show
is compact for
, we need to show that
is relatively compact in
X, for any
and
.
Let
be fixed. For any
, define
Then
and
where
is the Beta function. Due to the compactness of
, we obtain that
is relatively compact in
X for arbitrary
.
In addition, for any
, we have
Therefore, we obtain that
is relatively compact in
X. □
Remark 5. If B is the infinitesimal generator of a -semigroup on a Banach space, then is compact if and only if is continuous in the uniform operator topology for and is compact for [38]. If and , is compact if and only if A generates a compact semigroup, which is also obtained in [40].
Lemma 10.
Assume that , , for , and u satisfies (12). Then u satisfies the formal integral equation
Proof. By the definitions of Caputo derivative and Riemann-Liouville integral [
2], one can rewrite (
12) as in the equivalent integral equation
For
, using the Laplace transform
to (
12), we have
Then (
23) is equivalent to
By the inverse Laplace transform and Definition 6, we have
where
. □
Consequently, we give the definition of a mild solution to (
12) as follows.
Definition 11. The function
is called a mild solution of equation (
12) if
Lemma 12.([41])The convex closure is compact provided Z is a compact subset of a Banach space.
Lemma 13.([42])Assume that is completely continuous, where Y is a convex subset of a Banach space and . Then either there is a fixed point of H or the set is unbounded, where .
Lemma 14.([43]) Suppose that D is a bounded, convex and closed subset of a Banach space, , is continuous. If or can obtain for every subset V of D, then N has a fixed point.
3. Main results
In order to obtain the main results, we should introduce some hypotheses.
() is continuous with respect to for almost all , and strongly measurable with respect to for any ;
() is strongly measurable with respect to any and almost all ;
(
)
is completely continuous, and there exists a constant
such that
for any
;
(
) For
, there exists a constant
such that
for any
;
(
) There exists a continuous function
such that
for a.e.
and each
;
() is compact for ;
(
) For any bounded subset
of
X and each
, there exists
such that
and
, where
is defined as in (
);
(
) There exist
such that
and
, where
is defined as in (
),
,
, and
Theorem 15.
If ()-() are satisfied, then (12) has a mild solution provided that
Proof. Let
For any
, by Lemma 7 and (
), we have
Furthermore, due to (
),
is a measurable function on
J. By Lemma 7 and (
), we get
Then,
is Lebesgue integrable with respect to
and
, which implies that
is Bochner integrable with respect to
and
because of Bochner’s theorem.
Now we can define an operator
Q on
as follows:
We firstly prove that
Q is a completely continuous operator. Suppose that
then
Obviously,
as
by (
27) and (
). Since (
) we have
Then by Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem and (
), we get
as
. Therefore,
That is,
Q is continuous on
.
Next, we prove that is relatively compact. It suffices to show that is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous, and is relatively compact in X for any .
(
25) and (
26) imply
which means
is uniformly bounded. Take
and
, then
, where
It is easy to see that
as
by Remark 4. By (
) and (
17), we have
which implies that
as
.
Then
as
and
by Lemma 8 and (
17). Now, we can concluded that
is equicontinuous.
Obviously, due to (
),
is relatively compact. By (
), (
) and Remark 5, we can similarly prove the compactness of
for
. Due to (
), (
) and Lemma 9,
U is compact for
, then
is compact for
by Lemma 12, where
By Mean-Value Theorem for the Bochner integral [
44],
As a consequence,
is compact in
X for all
. Then
is relatively compact in
X for any
.
By the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, is relatively compact. By combining with the continuity of Q, we conclude that is completely continuous.
Set
let us prove the boundedness of
. Apparently,
. For
, we have
for
. Therefore,
Q has a fixed point by Lemma 13. That is, (
12) has a mild solution. □
Theorem 16. Under the assumptions (), (), () and (), (12) has a mild solution provided and .
Proof. Similar to Theorem 15,
is continuous,
is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous, where
is defined as in Theorem 15. Let
such that
, then
is continuous for any
because of the boundness and equicontinuity of
V. Then by Lemma 5, (
) and (
17), we have
Since
, we have
, namely,
. Consequently,
is relatively compact in
X. By the Arzela-Ascoli theorem,
is relatively compact, which means
. Thus the proof is completed by Lemma 14. □
Theorem 17. If (), () and () are satisfied, then (12) has a unique mild solution provided .
Proof. Let
By (
), we have
and
g is continuous. Similar to Theorem 15, for
,
exists, and
is Bochner integrable with respect to
and
. We also have that
Q maps
into itself. Apparently, we only need prove that
Q has a unique fixed point on
. For any
and
, according to (
) we have
Since
, by Banach contraction principle, we conclude that
Q has a unique fixed point on
, the proof is complete. □
4. Conclusions
This article investigates the nonlocal initial value problem for a class of fractional order integro-differential diffusion equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions. By selecting appropriate Banach spaces, we transform the original problem into an abstract Cauchy problem. At the same time, we prove that operator
A can generate a resolvent family
, and provide proof that it is continuous in the uniform topology and strongly continuous. If the analytical semigroup
generated by
A is compact, then
is also compact. Through the relationship between Laplace transform and convolution, we also establish the relationship between
and the probability density function
. It is worth noting that since
A in [
23] is
-sector (
<0) and the order of the equation is different from that in this paper, the proof of
is bounded cannot be directly applied in this paper. By the Laplace transform, the definition of a mild solution for (
12) be given, and finally prove the existence and uniqueness of the mild solution through several fixed point theorems. In the future, we may focus on the following meaningful topics:
The condition () is strict, we hope to obtain the existence of the solution in this paper without requiring to be compact;
For and in this paper, the stability and periodicity of ;
By Remark 2, we have known
can establisn a relationship with
and
, then we expect to investigate the regularity of solutions for (
12) by
if
f satisfies a certain degree of continuity.