Preprint

Review

Advancements in Exploiting Sporosarcina Pasteurii as Sustainable Construction Material: A Review

Altmetrics

Downloads

145

Views

Comments

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Supplementary Material

supplementary.pdf (287.16KB )

Shiva Khoshtinat^*

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

07 September 2023

Posted:

11 September 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts

Abstract

With the development of bioinspired green solutions for sustainable construction over the past two decades, bio-cementation, which exploits the naturally occurring phenomenon of calcium carbonate precipitation in different environments, has drawn a lot of attention in both building construction and soil stabilization. Various types of microorganisms, along with specific enzymes derived from these microorganisms, have been utilized to harness the benefits of bio-cementation. Different application methods for incorporating this mechanism into the production process of the construction material, as well as a variety of experimental techniques for characterizing the outcomes of bio-cementation, have been developed and tested. Despite the success of bio-cementation as a sustainable method to construction has been demonstrated in a significant body of literature at the laboratory scale, the expansion of this strategy to construction sites and field application remains a pending subject. The issue may be attributed to two primary challenges. Firstly, the complexity of the bio-cementation phenomenon is influenced by a variety of factors. Secondly, the extensive body of literature examines various types of microorganisms under different conditions, leading to a wide range of outcomes. Hence, this study aims to examine the recent advancements in utilizing the most commonly employed microorganism, Sporosarcina Pasteurii, to emphasize the significance of influential factors identified in the literature, discuss the findings that have been brought to light, and outline future research directions toward scaling up the process.

Keywords:

Subject: Engineering - Civil Engineering

1. Introduction

Calcium carbonate (

{C a C O}_{3}

) precipitation is a naturally occurring phenomenon in different environments, including marine water, freshwater, and soils. Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP), which exploits the microbial metabolic processes for bio-cementation to enhance the durability of construction materials, has drawn attention not only in soil stabilization [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] and building construction [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] but also in wind-induced desertification [23,24,25,26], stone artwork conservation [27], and even subsurface-related applications [28,29]. Microorganisms engaged in the nitrogen cycle, sulphate-reducing bacteria, and photosynthetic microorganisms have all been reported to induce calcium carbonate [30,31]. Although the bio-cementation process produces ammonia gas that is undesirable [32], in comparison to the traditional methods, which make use of Portland cement, it offers a variety of benefits, including:

bio-cementation can be produced at room temperature, thus the amount of energy needed for its manufacturing is significantly less than that required for conventional cement, resulting in a 43–95% decrease in embodied energy [33];
the carbon footprint from the bio-cementation process is about 18–49.6% lower than that from traditional cement [33];
due to the relatively low viscosity of the cementation solution and bacterial suspension, the bacterium can flow like water during the bio-cementation process and move through the pores of the concrete [34];
bacterial sizes are less than 10 µm, which is considerably smaller than the sizes of cement (<40 µm), therefore the pore openings can be as small as 6 mm [35];
The cost-effectiveness of the MICP treatment compared to conventional treatments demonstrated a lifecycle cost reduction of about 98% [36,37].

1.1. Bio-cementing Agents

Over the last two decades, researchers have investigated various techniques to exploit bio-cementation. These strategies are founded on three primary approaches:

(i): using allochthonous or autochthonous alive cells to exploit their metabolism[7,11,12,21,38,39];
(ii): the cell-free approach, which uses bacterial fraction components in the absence of viable cells [40];
(iii): isolating specific enzymes from microorganisms or plants for Enzymatic Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) [7,9,41,42,43,44,45,46].

A wide range of bacteria [38], including Sporosarcina Pasteurii [2,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55], Bacillus Subtilis [14,16,17,18,40,56,57,58,59], Bacillus cereus [20,60,61], and Bacillus megaterium [23,24,62,63], as well as enzymes isolated from plants such as Jack bean [42,45,64] and soybean [36,41,44], have been investigated in the literature. Navigating through the literature, however, it can be observed that Sporosarcina Pasteurii (S. Pasteurii) is the most widely employed bacteria, as it demonstrates a higher rate and quality of calcium carbonate precipitation due to its species characteristics [65,66]. Parallel comparison investigations comparing the results of native bacteria present in soil with S. Pasteurii cementation proved that this bacterium is highly efficient for bio-cementation and outperforms indigenous bacteria [47,67,68].

1.2. Application Methods of Bio-cementation

Various application strategies, including mixing, injection, spraying, immersion [20,69,70,71], and even 3D printing [72,73,74], have been explored in the literature for introducing the bio-cementing agent into cementitious materials for MICP or EICP. However, the majority of the literature primarily uses three methods: injection or grouting, surface percolation or spraying, and mixing [11].

Injection is the most popular method to introduce bio-cementing agents into the system, in particular for soil stabilization applications [11]. Using a peristaltic pump, bacterial suspension and cementation solution are injected into the sand in either a vertical [10,75] or horizontal [76] trajectory. The advantage of this approach is that testing conditions, such as injection flow, pressure, and hydraulic gradient, may be easily modified for optimal treatment [10,77]. The main disadvantages of this method are unequal bacterial dispersion and inhomogeneity of

{C a C O}_{3}

concentration, which result in non-uniform treatment along the injection path. The problem derives from the fact that when bacteria are injected via the pore space, they are likely to be filtered by sand, resulting in a long-linear drop in bacterial concentration along the injection direction [78].

Surface percolation and spraying are superficial treatments in which the bacterial suspension and cementation solution are alternately dripped or sprayed over the soil surface, followed by solution penetration into the soil by gravity [37,79,80,81,82]. Due to the similarity of these methods to the injection technique, they share the drawbacks of uneven precipitation and surface clogging, which are mostly influenced by the sand's particle size. A comparative study on the effect of sand dimension in 2 m columns of one-dimensional trials conducted by Cheng and Cord-Ruwisch [83] revealed that after repeated treatments, the column of fine sand (size 0.3 mm) showed blockage at the injection end, resulting in a limited cementation depth of less than 1 m, but this issue was not observed in the column of coarse sand (size > 0.5 mm).

In the mixing method, which is relatively new, the bacteria are first cultured in a nutrient broth medium, and the broth is mechanically mixed with cementitious material until the desired homogeneity is attained. This method provides the opportunity to control the growth of bacteria and optimize the bacteria culture prior to the mixing procedure in order to achieve the highest possible concentration of bacteria. However, this approach has the potential downside of causing disturbance to the soil, which is significant since it may cause false stress to form in the soil sample due to the vigorous mixing of the soil and the cementing agent [11]. Although this method can open the doors to the development of "smart-living concrete," both the protection or immobilization of bacteria and the source of nutrients for establishing the long-term and repetitive self-healing effect are still open questions [17].

1.3. Parameters That Influence Bio-cementation

Bio-cementation treatment is a complex phenomenon influenced by several factors, including bacteria type (e.g., high, medium, or low urease activity), bacteria condition (e.g., live, bacterial fraction, or enzyme extracted from bacteria or plant) [27], application method (e.g., injection, mixture, spraying)[3,19], as well as environmental factors such as pH [84], temperature [20], nutrition media [9,85,86], and grain size and nucleation sites [46,49,87], all of which affect the precipitation quantity and quality of calcium carbonate crystals and consequently alter the permeability and mechanical properties of the treated construction material. Figure 1 depicts a summary of factors that affect the bio-cementation process. For instance, a study on the morphology and evolution of crystals by two Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains altered to have either high or low urease activity over the course of seven days revealed that the strain with low urease activity produced nanocrystalline sheets during the first day, which after seven days of precipitation resulted in well-crystallized and extraordinarily large crystals that were 1924% larger than those with high urease activity due to the difference in kinetics of mineralization between the two strains [88].

Like any other chemical process, temperature significantly impacts the kinetics of the enzymatic activity of the bacteria in bio-cementation, and it can have a direct impact on crystal dissolution behavior following the Ostwald law [89]. A modest adjustment of 1 or 2 °C in the reaction temperature might cause changes in the outcomes of 10% to 20% and most enzymes' activity increases by 50% to 100% when the temperature rises by 10 °C [90]. But this rise only lasts as long as the elevated temperature doesn't denature the enzyme and change its structure. Similar to temperature, the pH of the environment (construction material in this case) substantially impacts bacterial enzymatic activity. At the microlevel, pH variation affects microbial cells by two different mechanisms: it alters the enzymatic reaction rate and the transport of nutrients into the cell [91]. Changing the pH level outside of its optimum range may slow down or even stop the bacteria's enzymatic activity and

{C a C O}_{3}

precipitation, as the bacteria will not survive [43].

One additional factor that impacts the bio-cementation process and contributes to its complexity is the nutrition medium on which the bacteria rely for food [20,85]. Calcium carbonate crystal types include calcite, vaterite, and aragonite, with calcite being the most common and stable [92,93]. The composition of the nutritional medium has a significant effect on the

{C a C O}_{3}

crystal morphology [93]. Even though yeast extract slows down the rate of hydration by a large amount, it is often used as a carbon source in bio-cementation applications as a nutritional medium. As a result, ongoing research is being conducted to explore alternative solutions [64,85,86].

Grain size has a significant impact on the outcomes of bio-cementation, as it can lead to non-homogeneity in large-scale applications. The particle's granularity directly affects the spacing between particles, which in turn acts as nucleation sites for the precipitation of

{C a C O}_{3}

by the bio-cementing agent. In the case of a mixture containing predominantly fine grains, when the particles are excessively small, the bio-cementing agent will fill the narrow gaps between the particles and become restricted within these confined spaces. In the case of a mixture containing predominantly coarse grains with excessive distance between the particles, on the other hand, bacteria will have unrestricted movement between the pores. However, over time, gravity will cause the bacteria to migrate towards the lower level of the specimen, resulting again in non-homogeneity [46]. The urease activity of bacteria or enzymes and the kinetics of

{C a C O}_{3}

precipitation also play an additional role in this matter. In the case of a low urease activity bacteria that exhibits a slower precipitation rate of

{C a C O}_{3}

, the reduced kinetic activity may allow for the potential migration of the bacteria to other pores, resulting in a more uniform outcome.

1.4. Characterization Techniques

Various experimental methodologies for qualitative and quantitative characterization of treated material and bio-cementation efficiency were employed. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) has been employed for morphological analysis, which offers a wide range of information, including the efficiency of bio-cementation in filling nucleation sites [46], as well as the effect of the bacterial strain and its urease activity rate [21,39,47,68,88], bacterial condition [40,67], nutritional solution [37,64], and the difference between MICP and EICP [46,84] on the shape and quantity of precipitated

{C a C O}_{3}

crystals. For instance, Phua and Røyne [64] used SEM to highlight the influence of nutritional solution on the

{C a C O}_{3}

crystal shape precipitated by Jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis) urease, revealing that calcium chloride solution resulted in rhombohedral

{C a C O}_{3}

crystals with dimensions ranging from 20 to 80 µm, while calcium lactate and dissolved chalk solution precipitated spherical

{C a C O}_{3}

crystals with a diameter between 100 and 250 µm (Figure 2).

Several studies took advantage of the elemental mapping capability of Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS or EDX) to study the surface composition and polymorphs of calcium carbonate (calcite, vaterite, and aragonite) in treated samples [46,55,64,68]. X-Ray Diffraction analysis (XRD) has been used to determine the crystallographic structure of the newly formed precipitated

{C a C O}_{3}

as well as the intensity of each polymorph compared to the other [84,94].

One of the most important outcomes of bio-cementation is the

{C a C O}_{3}

concentration, which has a significant impact on the mechanical properties of the treated construction material. The distribution of

{C a C O}_{3}

content after the completion of the curing time or treatment is used to determine whether sand columns are adequately solidified. In a comparative study conducted by Choi et al. [95], six different methods, namely titration, inductively coupled plasma (ICP), X-ray diffraction (XRD) TOPAS, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), ASTM, and washing methods, were adopted to measure the calcium carbonate content, which highlighted that titration and ICP techniques gave the lowest value and the washing method the highest value for

{C a C O}_{3}

content.

Regarding the mechanical properties characterization, experimental techniques such as Unconfined Compressive Strength tests (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR), and Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) based on ASTM D2166/D2166M-16 [96], ASTM D1883-21 [97], and ASTM D3441-16 [98] respectively, as well as Direct Shear Tests (DST), have been employed. Permeability is another important property that indicates the efficiency of bio-cementation treatment. The significance of this property may vary across different application fields; however, it is evident that achieving low permeability is the objective across all application fields. In the context of building construction applications, high permeability leads to the rapid penetration of water containing harmful substances, thereby compromising durability and causing gradual deterioration. In soil stabilization, on the other hand, the elevated permeability characteristic of certain soils can facilitate the infiltration of liquids, such as water, thereby potentially causing the erosion and removal of particles. Depending on the application field and sand properties, the permeability properties of treated samples have been characterized using a variety of methods, including the rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT) [61,99], water absorption, constant head test method [8,10], falling head test [94], and standard protocols such as ASTM D2434-22 [100], ASTM D2435/ D2435-11 (2020) [101], ASTM C 1585-20 [102], and ASTM 5856-15 [103].

1.5. Focus of This Review and Bibliometric Analysis

As a result of technological advancement and actions towards multidisciplinarity with the involvement of microbiology and material engineering, the window of opportunity to exploit this phenomenon has widened and provided an infinite number of possibilities, which in turn makes it more difficult to reach the optimized solution. Although a large body of literature has been devoted to this topic, the viability of scaling up this technology to the construction site and field scale remains to be extensively explored. Therefore, an overview of the most recent advances in this context will be required to emphasize the advantages, drawbacks, and knowledge gaps and shed light on the road towards scaling up this process. Although the mechanism of bio-cementation has been described in many studies devoted to exploiting bio-cementation, it is important to elaborate on the chemical reactions occurring during this phenomenon. In light of this, the first topic that will be covered in this review is the process by which bio-cementing agents precipitate calcium carbonate. Herein, the biochemical reactions for

{C a C O}_{3}

precipitation by microorganisms involved in the nitrogen cycle are described as an example. For the sake of brevity and in order to have a more concise view on the influencing factors and different application methods, this review concentrates on the bacteria that has been referenced most frequently across the literature, namely Sporosarcina Pasteurii. Thus, a section of this review article is devoted to the properties of S. Pasteurii from a microbiological standpoint, as well as how various parameters influence the outcomes of bio-cementation processes that are assisted by this bacterium in particular. Following that, recent advances in employing Sporosarcina Pasteurii as a sustainable construction material, specifically in soil stabilization and the building construction sector, will be presented. This section will examine studies that presented systematic comparative analysis in these application sectors, and the most significant results will be highlighted. Last but not least, concluding remarks, knowledge gaps, and a future perspective will be presented.

The process of selecting cited literature in this review article has been conducted according to the following steps:

The four keywords, namely "bio-cementation," "Sporosarcina Pasteurii," "Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP)," and "Enzymatic Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (EICP)," were searched on Google Scholar and Scopus.
The pre-screening process was conducted to determine the relevance of the search results. A total of 194 articles were identified as primarily relevant within the scope of this review article.
The articles that were chosen have been classified into two categories: "review articles" and "original research".
The original research articles were classified according to two criteria: "the type of bacteria or enzyme studied", and the specific "application field" in which the research was conducted.
For the selected original articles, the "application method," the primary "experimental methodology" used for characterization, and the "key outcomes" were highlighted. Following this secondary screening, 143 publications were chosen to be included in this manuscript.
The review articles and original research articles that were not specifically related to Sporosarcina Pasteurii but presented results that highlighted specific outcomes for bio-cementation, such as the effect of influencing parameters or application methods or specific outcomes for experimental methods used in a creative or critical manner, were used in the introduction section to depict a clear background of bio-cementation and governing parameters for the reader.
Articles that focus on the specific characteristics of S. Pasteurii and its behavior in various environments, as well as the results obtained from its application in soil stabilization and building construction, are used in Sections 3 and 4.

2. Bio-cementation Mechanism

Bio-cementation is a complex multi-step process that starts with the production of urease, a multi-subunit, nickel-containing enzyme that is synthesized by ureolytic bacteria. Figure 3 depicts a schematic representation of the chemical reaction for microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation by a microorganism involved in the nitrogen cycle as an example. The stepwise chemical reactions of MICP are as follows:

the hydrolysis of urea ( $C O {(N H_{2})}_{2}$ ) under the catalysis of the bacteria’s urease produces ammonia ( $N H_{3}$ ) and carbamic acid ( $N H_{2} C O O H$ );
carbamic acid hydrolysis leads to ammonia and carbon dioxide;
ammonia interacts with water and generates hydroxide ( ${O H}^{-}$ ), and ammonium ( $N H_{4}$ ) leading to a pH increase of about 1-2 pH;
meanwhile carbon dioxide in the system reacts with water resulting bicarbonate ( ${H C O}_{3}^{-}$ ) and hydrogen ion ( $H^{+}$ );
the system reaches equilibrium and generates carbonate ions ( ${C O}_{3}^{2 -}$ ) and water;
eventually, the reaction of carbonate with calcium ions ( ${C a}^{2 +}$ ) in the environment results in the precipitation of ${C a C O}_{3}$ crystals.

It is important to keep in mind that

{C a}^{2 +}

and other cation in this system are bonded with water dipoles in an aqueous environment (nutrient media). As a result, these ions need to be dehydrated before they can attract

{C O}_{3}^{2 -}

and precipitate

{C a C O}_{3}

[104].

Although the EICP method employs urease obtained directly from plants or bacterial cells rather than live urease-producing bacteria (MICP) for the purpose of urea hydrolysis, it relies on identical biochemical reactions. The alterations seen in EICP treatment pertain primarily to the reaction rate and, as a result, the characteristics of the precipitated Calcium Carbonate [46]. In addition, it should be noted that the cost of EICP is higher compared to MICP. This is primarily attributed to the significant expenses involved in acquiring commercially purified urease enzymes derived from plants or bacteria, even for small-scale laboratory experiments. According to previous research findings, this expense can account for up to 60% of the overall operating costs, which is almost twice the cost of the growth medium ingredients themselves [10,105].

3. Sporosarcina Pasteurii (S. Pasteurii)

Sporosarcina Pasteurii, previously referred to as Bacillus Pasteurii in older classifications, is an aerobe, mesophilic, rod-shaped (0.5-1.2 µm in width and 1.3-4.0 µm in length), gram-positive bacterium that is the most dominant microorganism used in MICP and EICP. S. Pasteurii is able to form endospores, which are non-reproductive structures generated by bacteria, or the dormant form to which the bacterium can reduce itself [65]. Endospore development is frequently driven by a lack of nutrition. Endospores allow the bacterium to remain dormant for extended periods of time in the absence of nutrition, surviving ultraviolet radiation, desiccation, high temperatures, freezing temperatures, and chemical disinfectants until the environment improves and the endospore can revive itself [66]. This feature improves S. Pasteurii's ability to survive in hostile environments and gives it the opportunity to have its metabolic system enabled or disabled depending on the requirements of the engineers. Various strains of S. Pasteurii have been utilized in the literature, including ATCC 11859 [2,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55], ATCC 1376 [106,107], PTCC 1645 [108,109], DSM 33[8,76,81,110], and NB28(SUTS) [1,4]. Being an alkaliphile, this bacterium grows best in an alkaline environment with a pH between 9 and 10 [111]; however, it can survive in moderately harsh circumstances up to a pH of 11.2 [112], making it also a suitable admixture component for building construction applications.

S. Pasteurii, like all other Sporosarcina species, is heterotrophic, which means it cannot make its own food and must rely on other sources for nutrition. S. Pasteurii needs, in particular, urea and ammonium as nutrients for growth [113]. Depending on the type of nutrient provided for bacteria, its metabolism and, as a consequence, its urease activity and the rate at which calcium carbonate precipitates will differ, which emphasizes the significance of nutrition media in bio-cementation [38]. An investigation on the optimum concentrations of urea, calcium, and nickel to enhance calcium carbonate precipitation and S. Pasteurii growth rate revealed that high urea and nickel concentrations and low calcium concentrations are required [114].

As mentioned before (Section 1.3), yeast extract is a commonly employed nutritional medium in bio-cementation applications, despite its significant impact on hydration rate reduction. However, the study on the effect of nutrient medium for optimizing S. Pasteurii growth and cement hydration using six different nutrition media, namely yeast extract, lactose mother liquor, corn steep liquor, meat extract, glucose, and sodium acetate, revealed that the combination of meat extract and sodium acetate is a suitable replacement for yeast extract, as it reduced retardation by 75% (as compared to yeast extract) without compromising bacterial growth, urea hydrolysis, cell zeta potential, or the ability to promote calcium carbonate formation [86]. Yet, additional research is required to investigate the impact of these different growth media on other characteristics of concrete, such as its cost, strength, shrinkage, resistance to corrosion, and workability. Another investigation on the viability of S. Pasteurii under extreme conditions (30, 45, and 55°C) and pH (12.5–13.6) conditions demonstrated that exposing the bacteria to extreme temperatures (specifically 55 °C for 4 hours) and extreme pH (specifically 13.6 for 4 hours) led to the most significant decrease in both the concentration of viable cells and the initial rate of ammonia production through urea hydrolysis [115]. However, to the best of the author's knowledge, a comprehensive parametric study in the literature providing insights on the effect of temperature within a larger range (-5–50 °C) and extreme pH (1–14) on variation of

{C a C O}_{3}

precipitation or denaturation of bacteria or enzymes, which could help the simulation of this process for optimization, does not exist.

As mentioned before, for the same microorganism, the agent condition (live, enzyme extracted, or cell fraction) affects the result of precipitated

{C a C O}_{3}

and, consequently, the properties of the treated material. Hoang et al. [46] compared the crystallography, mechanical, and permeability properties of bio-cementation via MICP and EICP by S. Pasteurii after 12 cycles of treatment. The results of this comprehensive investigation concluded that:

MICP strategy creates large crystal clusters with a thickness ranging from 50 to 100 µm, whereas the size of crystals via EICP are significantly smaller, ranging from 5 to 20 µm,
the same number of treatments resulted in a higher ${C a C O}_{3}$ content for MICP, and at a constant percentage of ${C a C O}_{3}$ , the mechanical properties of EICP-treated samples were superior to those treated by MICP
while ${C a C O}_{3}$ precipitation levels differed (2.5–16%) and (1.5–8%), the peak stress for UCS tests of treated samples in both cases ranged from 200–2400 kPa,
permeability levels for EICP-treated samples were slightly lower in the range of 1.5%-4% ${C a C O}_{3}$ precipitation compared to MICP-treated, while the MICP-treated permeability decreased by 3 to 4 orders of magnitude between 13-16% ${C a C O}_{3}$ content.

The comparison of MICP and EICP treatment by S. Pasteurii in relation to pH fluctuation by Lai et al. [84] highlighted three key aspects. First, in acid environments (pH = 4–7), MICP treatment appears to be faster than EICP treatment since the delay time for visible flocculation —an indication of precipitation kinetics— is shorter in MICP treatment, and MICP appears to be less influenced by pH variation as it begins to precipitate

{C a C O}_{3}

, even at pH of about 4.5 when the EICP process does not even start (Figure 4 (a)). Second, EICP treatment appears to outperform MICP treatment in terms of average calcium carbonate content (CCC) at pH above 5.5; by decreasing the pH below 5.5, CCC decreases and declines dramatically at pH = 4.5, while MICP treatment appears to have almost a consistent precipitation up to pH = 4.5 and a decrease at pH = 4 (Figure 4 (b)). The third outcome of this investigation concerns the morphology of calcium carbonate crystals. For the same initial pH, EICP Treatment seems to predominantly precipitate calcite, which is the most stable polymorph of

{C a C O}_{3}

, while MICP treatment produces both calcite and vaterite. This aspect results in significantly higher mechanical properties for EICP treatment (Figure 4 c and d). Despite the numerous advantages of EICP over MICP, the MICP treatment continues to receive more attention due to its significantly lower cost in comparison to EICP.

Figure 4. Effect of pH variation on EICP- and MICP-treated soil by S. Pasteurii: (a) Delay in flocculation at various initial pH conditions; (b) average calcium carbonate content in the whole sample; (c) Unconfined compressive strength; (d) Relation between strength and calcium carbonate content. Adapted with permission from Springer Nature [84]

4. Recent advancements in exploiting S. Pasteurii

As mentioned before, Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation is already a complex phenomenon that can be influenced by a variety of parameters. On the other hand, a large body of literature has been devoted to the study of S. Pasteurii as a sustainable construction material, investigating one or two parameters at a time. Hence, this section focuses only on the literature that presents parallel comparative methodologies and systematic characterizations and assessments. The preceding section (Sections 3) has covered the latest developments concerning the factors that impact the distinct characteristics of S. Pasteurii, as well as its behavior and viability in different environments. This section is dedicated to discussing the in-situ application of bio-cementation. It will cover relevant literature that explores the effects of different application methods and the challenges encountered in various application sectors. Among the application domains of bio-cementation, the soil stabilization and building construction sector has investigated this strategy the most.

Although researchers were able to employ bio-cementation to develop commercially available building construction materials such as bio-based bricks that received a patent [116] and reached mass production level (e.g., Biolith® tiles by Biomason, Inc. [117]), the viability of scaling up this technology to the construction site and field scale remains to be extensively explored [1]. Since application methods of bio-cementation (Section 1.2), in particular injection or grouting, are already widely used in soil stabilization, exploiting MICP in field-scale applications in this sector is much more advanced than building construction. Hence, a closer look at the latest developments in soil stabilization can shed light on the most recent findings and areas of knowledge that require further exploration for scaling up this technology in this field as well as in building construction applications.

4.1. Soil Stabilization

Traditional soil improvement strategies, such as adding natural and synthetic materials (e.g., recycled glass fibers, tires, fruit brunches, polypropylene, and polyester); injection of chemical grouting or deep mixing using cement and/or lime; and application of sand or stone columns, rely on synthetic substances that require significant energy for production and application and raise the pH of groundwater, causing serious environmental problems and contributing to ecosystem disturbance [11]. With the widespread implementation of bio-cementation in soil stabilization applications, researchers have investigated the effects of different parameters, such as application method, nutrition media, and sand granularity, on the properties of S. Pasteurii-treated soil at both laboratory and in-situ field scales. Regarding the application method, injection is the most common method for MICP-based soil stabilization. These findings underscore a significant aspect regarding the impact of grain size. While a higher level of porosity (100% coarse grain in Column A) does facilitate the migration of the bio-cementing agent throughout the treated column and may result in the highest

{C a C O}_{3}

content, it does not necessarily yield the best mechanical properties. This is due to the fact that the bacterial solution tends to migrate to the bottom of the column under the influence of gravity, resulting in non-homogeneity throughout the column. Consequently, the top of the column exhibits the lowest

{C a C O}_{3}

content, while the bottom exhibits the highest, contributing to the overall inferior mechanical properties of the column due to non-homogeneity.

As previously stated, soil stabilization is more advanced than other application fields of bio-cementation when it comes to scaling up the process for field application. Few studies have been conducted on the scaling up of bio-cementation to field scale [1,119,120,121,122] ; therefore, it is important to highlight the most significant findings from these investigations. Omoregie et al. [1] presented an economic strategy to scale up the production and cultivation of S. Pasteurii under nonsterile condition using a custom-built stainless steel stirred tank reactor with a capacity of 3 m3. The scalability of the bacterial cells was investigated by increasing the volume of the seed cultures from 214 L to 2400 L and monitoring their growth for a duration of 90 hours. The results of the in-situ soil bio-cementation experiment demonstrated that bacterial cells, cultivated using this method, retained their ability to induce

{C a C O}_{3}

precipitation even after being immobilized within sand specimens. The presence of

{C a C O}_{3}

crystal formation within the treated sand particles was confirmed through the analysis of

{C a C O}_{3}

content and microstructural data, which confirmed that the method presented in this study is as successful as the sterile condition.

Table 1 summarizes some of the findings from systematic investigations in the literature that used S. Pasteurii for soil stabilization applications by injection. Table of literature that used other application methods to introduce S. Pasteurii for soil stabilization are presented in Supplementary Materials Table S 1.

Although the injection method has proven to be quite effective in small specimens at the laboratory scale, significant problems have been noted at larger scales. Whiffin et al. [10] investigated the impact of vertical injection of S. Pasteurii along a 5-meter-long sand column. Their findings revealed that while calcium carbonate precipitation occurred throughout the entire treatment length, the concentration profile exhibited non-uniformity. In particular, higher quantities of calcium carbonate were observed at the injection points, with a subsequent decline in concentration along the length of the column. The impact of injection direction was assessed by Paassen et al. [76] in a large-scale experiment involving the horizontal injection of S. Pasteurii in a soil bed with a volume of 100 m³. The study revealed a considerable variation in the peak strength of the unconfined compressive strength values, confirming again non-uniformity along the path of injection within the treated sand volume. In general, as the distance from the injection points increases, there is a decrease in the calcium carbonate content, which leads to an increase in porosity and a subsequent decline in the mechanical properties. This limitation of MICP application on a large scale arises from the occurrence of system clogging near the injection sites. This phenomenon is caused by the rapid precipitation of calcium carbonate by the bio-cementing agent, which leads to the closure of pores and hinders the migration of the bio-cementing agent throughout the entire treatment area, resulting in non-homogeneity. Hence, it is anticipated that the utilization of bio-cementing agents with low urease activity or the regulation of bio-cementation kinetics to achieve a slower rate would result in a reduced level of non-homogeneity in treatment, as it would facilitate the effective distribution of the bio-cementing agent along the entire length of the treatment. This disadvantage can be mitigated by employing a two-phase vertical injection procedure (alternating the injection of bacterial suspension and cementation or nutritional solution) and fine-tuning the injection parameters, such as decreasing the injection rate of bacterial suspension and increasing the flow rate of cementation solution [10,77].

Among the several research that evaluated the impact of particle size on the effectiveness of bio-cementation treatment aided by S. Pasteurii, three stand out due to their systematic approaches [46,49,118]. Lin et al. [118] studied the effect of grain size on MICP-treated Ottawa sand by S. Pasteurii, considering fine grains (D_10% = 0.26 mm and D_50% = 0.33 mm) and coarse grains (D_10% = 0.58 mm and D_50% = 0.71 mm). The findings of this investigation revealed that the coarse-grain soil had a lower

{C a C O}_{3}

content in comparison to the fine-grain soil. However, it was observed that the coarse-grain soil demonstrated greater increases in S-wave velocity, peak shear strength, and cohesiveness when compared to the fine-grain soil. Moreover, the results obtained from triaxial testing indicated that the peak deviator stress of the coarse-grained soil containing 1.6%

{C a C O}_{3}

and the fine-grained soil containing 1%

{C a C O}_{3}

exhibited an average increase of 93% and 171%, respectively, as compared to their respective untreated specimens.

Hoang et al. [46], on the other hand, investigated this effect on EICP-treated silica (SiO2)/quartz sand, considering fine grains (D_10% = 0.26 mm and D_50% = 0.36 mm) and coarse grains (D_10% = 0.61 mm and D_50% = 0.72 mm). The outcomes of this study highlighted that, similar to MICP-treated sand, the mechanical properties of EICP-treated sand, such as Young's modulus and UCS test, in coarse grain are higher than fine grain ( These findings underscore a significant aspect regarding the impact of grain size. While a higher level of porosity (100% coarse grain in Column A) does facilitate the migration of the bio-cementing agent throughout the treated column and may result in the highest

{C a C O}_{3}

{C a C O}_{3}

content, while the bottom exhibits the highest, contributing to the overall inferior mechanical properties of the column due to non-homogeneity.

{C a C O}_{3}

precipitation even after being immobilized within sand specimens. The presence of

{C a C O}_{3}

crystal formation within the treated sand particles was confirmed through the analysis of

{C a C O}_{3}

content and microstructural data, which confirmed that the method presented in this study is as successful as the sterile condition.

Table 1). The trend of permeability reduction influenced by grain size indicated that permeability reduction in fine-grained bio-cemented sands steadily declined with the increase in

{C a C O}_{3}

content, while for the same increase in

{C a C O}_{3}

, the trend of reduction in permeability declination was comparatively less pronounced in coarse-grained sand [46]. This phenomenon is often attributed to the smaller distances between particles, known as nucleation sites, in fine-coarse sand. The precipitation of calcium carbonate fills the small pores in fine grain rapidly, leading to the obstruction of pathways through which bacteria can move to continue the cementation in other pores. In coarse-grained sand, the interparticle spacing is greater. Through the precipitation of

{C a C O}_{3}

, the contact points between the particles are initially joined, followed by the deposition of additional layers of calcium carbonate on top. This process facilitates the movement of bacteria or enzymes through the pores, enabling them to reach more profound or distant locations.

Mahawish et al. [49] studied the effect of fine (0.075–9.5 mm) and coarse (2.36–16 mm) grain percentages in mixed Pakenham Blue Metal columns on the mechanical properties of treated sand. Five columns with different percentages of fine/coarse grains (A = 0/100, B = 25/75, C = 50/50, D = 75/25, E = 100/0 %) were subjected to MICP treatment by S. Pasteurii. The average calcium carbonate precipitation for columns A and E was determined to be about 7% and 6.5%, respectively, and about 6% for other mixed columns (B, C, and D). However, column B exhibited the most uniform distribution of

{C a C O}_{3}

along its length. The unconfined compressive strength test results for all three mixed columns (B, C, and D) were determined to be approximately 0.6 MPa, while for column A, despite having the highest

{C a C O}_{3}

content, this value was lowered by half to 0.3 MPa, and for column E, it was dropped to nearly 0.5 MPa. These findings underscore a significant aspect regarding the impact of grain size. While a higher level of porosity (100% coarse grain in Column A) does facilitate the migration of the bio-cementing agent throughout the treated column and may result in the highest

{C a C O}_{3}

{C a C O}_{3}

content, while the bottom exhibits the highest, contributing to the overall inferior mechanical properties of the column due to non-homogeneity.

As previously stated, soil stabilization is more advanced than other application fields of bio-cementation when it comes to scaling up the process for field application. Few studies have been conducted on the scaling up of bio-cementation to field scale [1,119,120,121,122] ; therefore, it is important to highlight the most significant findings from these investigations. Omoregie et al. [1] presented an economic strategy to scale up the production and cultivation of S. Pasteurii under nonsterile condition using a custom-built stainless steel stirred tank reactor with a capacity of 3 m³. The scalability of the bacterial cells was investigated by increasing the volume of the seed cultures from 214 L to 2400 L and monitoring their growth for a duration of 90 hours. The results of the in-situ soil bio-cementation experiment demonstrated that bacterial cells, cultivated using this method, retained their ability to induce

{C a C O}_{3}

precipitation even after being immobilized within sand specimens. The presence of

{C a C O}_{3}

crystal formation within the treated sand particles was confirmed through the analysis of

{C a C O}_{3}

content and microstructural data, which confirmed that the method presented in this study is as successful as the sterile condition.

4.2. Building Construction

Bio-cementation has been utilized in the field of building construction, primarily for producing new building materials rather than repairing damaged structures. The most common application method used in building construction is to employ bio-cementing solution as an admixture component of concrete. Table 2 presents an overview of key findings derived from systematic investigations documented in the literature, which have employed S. Pasteurii to develop self-healing concrete through mixing techniques. As can be observed, there is a notable disparity in the quantity of relevant publications utilizing S. Pasteurii in comparison to soil stabilization (Table 1 and Table S 1). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that in the context of building construction (Table 2), the primary emphasis is placed on mechanical and permeability characterization of the treated material rather than the assessment of calcium carbonate content, compared to soil stabilization(Table 1).

The experimental approach commonly used in the majority of the literature involves the following steps:

Introducing bacteria as an admixture component in concrete.
Curing the cast concrete for a period of 28 days.
Inducing cracks in the concrete by applying either uniaxial or flexural force.
Treating the damaged concrete with a bacterial nutrient media or treatment solution.
Monitoring the healing progress of the crack over time.
Conducting mechanical and permeability tests to characterize the healed concrete.

S. Pasteurii has shown remarkable effectiveness in repairing concrete cracks. A study by Sohail et al. [128] utilizing this bacterium for the purpose of repairing cracks in concrete has demonstrated that not only does this bacterium have the capability to effectively fill cracks up to a width of 4 mm, but it can also successfully adhere two separate pieces of a concrete specimen that have become detached during a flexural test.

Various nutritional media, such as Lactose mother liquor [129,130], sodium carbonate [130], calcium nitrate-urea, and calcium chloride-urea [130,131], have been employed in the cultivation of S. Pasteurii within concrete mixtures. However, due to the variability in environmental conditions, concrete components, and treatment methods, it is unfortunate that a definitive conclusion cannot be reached on this matter. Kim et al. [132] investigated the influence of concrete type on the process of S. Pasteurii bio-cementation by measuring the relative mass gained as a result of treatment on normal and lightweight concrete, concluding that the relative weight gains observed in both normal and lightweight concrete were comparable. This suggests that the precipitation of calcium carbonate by S. Pasteurii is not dependent upon the specific type of concrete used, as long as the environmental conditions necessary for bacterial growth (such as concrete pH and temperature) remain consistent.

Although the straightforward method of adding bacterial and nutrient solutions into concrete mixtures is commonly employed, researchers have explored alternative approaches to introduce bacteria into concrete mixtures. Chen et al. [133] employed lightweight aggregates as carriers for S. Pasteurii in concrete. In this study, the aggregates underwent several initial immersions in nutrient media (specifically, calcium lactate/yeast extract), followed by multiple drying cycles. Subsequently, the aggregates were immersed in a bacterial solution. After the aggregates were completely dried, they were combined with other components to produce concrete. The comparison of the healing process of induced cracks was conducted on three groups: the controlled group (A) without treated aggregate; the air-cured treated group (B) with treated aggregate but no additional supplement; and the immersion-cured treated group (C) with treated aggregate and immersion in a urea/calcium carbonate solution. The results showed that the precipitation of

{C a C O}_{3}

by S. Pasteurii can be reactivated in the presence of appropriate nutrition; in group C, the cracks were completely cured after 91 days, while in group B, only partial curing was observed, and no curing was observed in group A.

When using bio-cementing agents as a mixture component in concrete, it's important to keep in mind that an excessive bacterial concentration in the concrete solution may not always lead to the best permeability or mechanical properties. For instance, an investigation on the effect of S. Pasteurii concentration (10³, 10⁵, and 10⁷ cells/ml) in a concrete mixture on the mechanical properties of the concrete demonstrated that the compressive strength of concrete with 10⁵ cells/ml bacterial concentration was 11% higher than that of 10³ cells/ml and 13.5% higher than that of 10⁷ cells/ml [134,135]. The observed decrease in compressive strength of concrete at higher cell concentrations of bacteria (10⁷ cells/ml) can be attributed to the disruption of matrix integrity caused by excessive bacterial activity.

The study conducted by Zaerkabeh et al. [136] is among the limited number of research efforts that have examined the impact of crack size on the effectiveness of self-healing concrete utilizing S. Pasteurii. Cracks with widths of 0.5 and 1 mm and depths of 5, 10, and 15 mm were investigated in this study. The study's findings indicate that the flexural strength and energy absorption capability of the specimens dropped as the depth and width of the cracks increased. Notably, the specimen with a crack depth and width of 0.5 exhibited the highest healing efficiency after 7 and 28 days. While the authors acknowledge that impeding the flow of nutrients and oxygen by clogging the pores could potentially lead to a drop in the healing rate among samples tested after 28 days, it is important to note that this study did not take into account the volume of the crack, which could possibly contribute to the observed reduction in healing of cracks with larger dimensions. It is comprehensible that in a suitable environment, the quantity of bio-cementation, like any other chemical reaction, is a function of time. Since the rate of the chemical reaction involving the precipitation of

{C a C O}_{3}

by S. Pasteurii for all the studied specimens is constant, the quantity of precipitated crystals will increase over time. Hence, in the case of larger cracks, a more extended period of monitoring the healing process may have yielded more precise conclusions.

Table 2. Selective literature employing S. Pasteurii for new construction material using mixing method.

* X: Experiment has been performed, CS: Compressive Strength.

5. Conclusions

5.1. Concluding Remarks

The goal of this review is to provide a concise summary of key elements pertinent to the current literature on using Sporosarcina Pasteurii as a sustainable construction material. The main novelties of this review are that it offers a general overview of the factors to be considered when using bio-cementation (especially for S. Pasteurii), provides a thorough summary of comparative studies on the subject that presented outstanding results, and sheds light on areas that have been overlooked in the literature and have the potential for future investigation. After a thorough examination and analysis of the most recent prominent works of literature, the concluding remarks of the review article may be summarized as follows:

The application of bio-cementation has demonstrated notable efficiency in different engineering sectors, exhibiting enhancements in mechanical properties and reduction in the permeability of construction materials at a laboratory scale. Moreover, the reduction in embodied energy (43-95%), carbon footprint (18-49.6%), and lifecycle cost-effectiveness render bio-cementation a significant step toward sustainable construction.
Bio-cementation, whether produced by microbial or enzymatic agents (MICP or EICP), is a complex phenomenon whose kinetics can be influenced by various parameters related to the characteristics of bio-cementing agents (rate of urease activity and bio-cementing agent condition), environmental conditions (temperature, pH, and availability of nutrition and nucleation sites), and even the method that has been used to employ bio-cementation. The increase in urease activity rate of the bio-cementing agent, which is influenced by factors such as the type of bio-cementing agent, nutrition media, pH, and temperature, leads to an increase in the number of precipitated crystals and a simultaneous decrease in the crystals' dimensions. The influence of pH and temperature on bio-cementation depends upon the specific bio-cementing agent employed, as each bacteria possesses its own distinct ideal pH and temperature conditions for enzymatic activity.
Among the different methods for introducing the bio-cementation agent into the system, the injection method is the primary technique used in soil stabilization. Despite the presence of several drawbacks and obstacles, which appear to be resolvable through the fine-tuning of the injection process, this method appears to be better suited for large-scale applications in this sector. Building construction, on the other hand, mainly uses bacteria or enzyme solutions and nutrition media as admixture components of construction material.
Sporosarcina Pasteurii is widely recognized as the predominant microorganism employed for bio-cementation due to its superior performance in terms of both quantity and quality of the precipitated ${C a C O}_{3}$ , as well as the enhanced permeability and mechanical properties of the treated material. S. Pasteurii has a biological mechanism that enables it to remain in a dormant state for an extended duration until it is exposed to a favorable environment where it can resume its activity of precipitating calcium carbonate. Moreover, it exhibits the ability to endure severe alkaline environments with a pH level as high as 13.6, as well as temperatures of 55 °C for a duration of 4 hours, while persisting in the process of precipitation, although at a reduced rate.
The results of the comparison between samples treated with Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) and samples treated with Enzyme-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) by S. Pasteurii indicate that the EICP treatment yields superior mechanical and permeability properties. However, the MICP process is favored by a larger number of investigations due to its cost-effectiveness. One of the reasons for this outcome is attributed to the disparity in size between the bacterium (on the order of micrometers) and the enzyme (on the order of nanometers), which facilitates the migration of enzyme within nucleation sites, leading to improved homogeneity and enhanced favorable properties.
The granularity of the treated particles is a crucial factor that greatly influences the homogeneity of bio-cementation and the treatment outcomes. An excessive amount of either fine or coarse grains will lead to an uneven treatment outcome, resulting in poor mechanical and impermeability properties. The homogeneity and outcome of bio-cementation are enhanced when a wide range and variation of particle sizes are used.

5.2. Future Reasearch Directions

Upon thorough examination of the research studies included in this review article, as well as those initially selected but ultimately excluded from the bibliometric analysis, it becomes evident that further exploration is required to enhance our comprehension of various elements regarding exploiting bio-cementation. Despite the extensive study of S. Pasteurii as the predominant bacterium used for bio-cementation, a comprehensive understanding of the process outcomes based on all the influencing parameters for optimization remains elusive due to the multitude of influencing parameters. This is due to the fact that existing literature primarily focuses on the examination of one or two parameters at a time, while several other parameters vary between different studies. The knowledge gaps and the direction of future investigations for a better exploitation of bio-cementation can be outlined as follows:

While there is a large body of literature dedicated to using bio-cementation for new construction materials, exploiting this phenomenon for remediation of existing damaged construction (existing concrete structures) to extend their service lives and avert demolition, thereby decreasing a portion of the construction waste, has not progressed as much. For example, there is a scarcity of research that has explored the potential application of bio-cementation for repairing cracks in concrete structures that do not already contain a bio-cementing agent as an admixture.
The current literature has approached employing bio-cementation from a construction standpoint, while the complexity of the bio-cementation phenomenon emphasizes the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach to exploiting bio-cementation at the intersection of biology, material engineering, and building construction, which is essential for addressing numerous unresolved inquiries pertaining to the exploitation of bio-cementation. Which bacterial strains or enzymatic agents demonstrate compatibility and suitability for applications in soil stabilization or building construction? Does the soil or construction material offer an ideal environment for the proper activity of the bio-cementing agent? Does achieving the optimal condition for the bio-cementing agent necessarily result in the attainment of optimal material qualities that are suited for the purposes of soil stabilization and construction applications?
A key step in the process of scaling up bio-cementation is conducting a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the biological composition of bacterial urease activity and the impact of various environmental factors on the bacterial ${C a C O}_{3}$ precipitation quantity and quality to gain a better understanding of the influential factor for one specific bacterium. Being able to describe the kinetics of ${C a C O}_{3}$ precipitation as a function of pH, temperature, and nutrition media provides a more comprehensive understanding of potential results and constraints. For example, conducting a comprehensive investigation on the impact of temperature on the activity of urease in S. Pasteurii, spanning from -5 °C to 55 °C at 5 °C intervals, can provide valuable insights into the consequences of freezing, the kinetics of precipitation in relation to temperature, and the temperature thresholds for bacterial viability and urease enzyme denaturation. In this context, using a multidisciplinary strategy in addressing this subject offers a broader and more extensive opportunity for experimental characterization. For instance, Optical Density (OD), which is a widely utilized method in microbiology for assessing cell viability, in the context of microbiologically induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP), can offer valuable insights into the performance of bacteria and the kinetics of ${C a C O}_{3}$ precipitation as a function of temperature, pH, and nutrition media, paving the way for significant input information for future numerical models.
Another underdeveloped aspect in the literature pertains to the numerical simulation models of bio-cementation. The significant constraints on studies are primarily attributed to the complex nature of the process, which occurs across different time and dimensional scales and entails interconnected biological, chemical, hydraulic and mechanical phenomena. The extremely limited research on this subject concentrated mostly on greater scales beginning with the pore in the treated material, without taking into account interrelated parameters [141,142]. Figure 5 presents a schematic illustration of the proposed flowchart by the author for the interrelated elements in bio-cementation that need to be taken into account as input for numerical modeling of this phenomenon, including pertinent disciplines and dimensional scales. The dimensional scale ranges from the nano or micro scale, depending on the use of EICP (nanometers) or MICP (micrometers), to the metric scale of treated construction material or soil. The multidisciplinary nature of bio-cementation involves the incorporation of diverse interrelated parameters from several disciplines at different stages as input. First, it is fundamental to establish the rate of urease activity from a biological perspective in relation to environmental conditions, including the initial pH, temperature, and nutrition media, to predict the rate and amount of ${C a C O}_{3}$ precipitation. As stated in Section 2, the bio-cementation process produces ammonium as a byproduct, leading to a pH increase of 1 to 2 units (Figure 3). This pH alteration subsequently influences the rate of urease activity. Hence, the starting pH and pH variation as a function of time with calcium carbonate precipitation must be addressed when determining the urease activity rate. On the other hand, as ${C a C O}_{3}$ precipitates, the availability of nutrition media for bio-cementing agents reduces with time, affecting urease activity once more. In parallel, parameters regarding treated material, such as application method and grain properties, that are specific for each application field, must be considered. For instance, in the case of soil stabilization by injection, the injection flow velocity and granularity of the treated soil are critical for fluid dynamic studies of injected solution propagation and bio-cementing agent migration. After taking into account all of these distinct characteristics from various disciplines on different dimensional scales, an accurate prediction of the bio-cementation process will be achievable.

Figure 5. Schematic representation of interconnected parameters in bio-cementation for numerical modeling of this phenomenon at different dimensional scales

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.; methodology, S.K.; validation, S.K.; formal analysis, S.K.; investigation, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K; writing—review and editing, S.K.; visualization, S.K. The author has read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

Omoregie, A.I.; Palombo, E.A.; Ong, D.E.L.; Nissom, P.M. A Feasible Scale-up Production of Sporosarcina Pasteurii Using Custom-Built Stirred Tank Reactor for in-Situ Soil Biocementation. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2020, 24, 101544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wani, K.M.N.S.; Mir, B.A. An Experimental Study on the Bio-Cementation and Bio-Clogging Effect of Bacteria in Improving Weak Dredged Soils. Geotech Geol Eng 2021, 39, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sharaky, A.M.; Mohamed, N.S.; Elmashad, M.E.; Shredah, N.M. Application of Microbial Biocementation to Improve the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Sandy Soil. Construction and Building Materials 2018, 190, 861–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xu, K.; Huang, M.; Xu, C.; Zhen, J.; Jin, G.; Gong, H. Assessment of the Bio-Cementation Effect on Shale Soil Using Ultrasound Measurement. Soils and Foundations 2023, 63, 101249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dubey, A.A.; Ravi, K.; Mukherjee, A.; Sahoo, L.; Abiala, M.A.; Dhami, N.K. Biocementation Mediated by Native Microbes from Brahmaputra Riverbank for Mitigation of Soil Erodibility. Sci Rep 2021, 11, 15250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cheng, L.; Shahin, M.A.; Cord-Ruwisch, R. Bio-Cementation of Sandy Soil Using Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation for Marine Environments. Géotechnique 2014, 64, 1010–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Abdel-Aleem, H.; Dishisha, T.; Saafan, A.; AbouKhadra, A.A.; Gaber, Y. Biocementation of Soil by Calcite/Aragonite Precipitation Using Pseudomonas Azotoformans and Citrobacter Freundii Derived Enzymes. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 17601–17611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yin, J.; Wu, J.-X.; Zhang, K.; Shahin, M.A.; Cheng, L. Comparison between MICP-Based Bio-Cementation Versus Traditional Portland Cementation for Oil-Contaminated Soil Stabilisation. Sustainability 2022, 15, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Venda Oliveira, P.J.; Neves, J.P.G. Effect of Organic Matter Content on Enzymatic Biocementation Process Applied to Coarse-Grained Soils. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 04019121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Whiffin, V.S.; van Paassen, L.A.; Harkes, M.P. Microbial Carbonate Precipitation as a Soil Improvement Technique. Geomicrobiology Journal 2007, 24, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mujah, D.; Shahin, M.A.; Cheng, L. State-of-the-Art Review of Biocementation by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) for Soil Stabilization. Geomicrobiology Journal 2017, 34, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Omoregie, A.I.; Palombo, E.A.; Nissom, P.M. Bioprecipitation of Calcium Carbonate Mediated by Ureolysis: A Review. Environmental Engineering Research 2020, 26, 200379–0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Iqbal, D.M.; Wong, L.S.; Kong, S.Y. Bio-Cementation in Construction Materials: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huynh, N.N.T.; Imamoto, K.; Kiyohara, C. A Study on Biomineralization Using Bacillus Subtilis Natto for Repeatability of Self-Healing Concrete and Strength Improvement. ACT 2019, 17, 700–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bagga, M.; Hamley-Bennett, C.; Alex, A.; Freeman, B.L.; Justo-Reinoso, I.; Mihai, I.C.; Gebhard, S.; Paine, K.; Jefferson, A.D.; Masoero, E.; et al. Advancements in Bacteria Based Self-Healing Concrete and the Promise of Modelling. Construction and Building Materials 2022, 358, 129412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huynh, N.N.T.; Phuong, N.M.; Toan, N.P.A.; Son, N.K. Bacillus Subtilis HU58 Immobilized in Micropores of Diatomite for Using in Self-Healing Concrete. Procedia Engineering 2017, 171, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huynh, N.N.T.; Imamoto, K.; Kiyohara, C. Biomineralization Analysis and Hydration Acceleration Effect in Self-Healing Concrete Using Bacillus Subtilis Natto. ACT 2022, 20, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huynh, N.; Imamoto, K.; Kiyohara, C. Compressive Strength Improvement and Water Permeability of Self-Healing Concrete Using Bacillus Subtilis Natto. In Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. eBook of Proceedings; CIMNE, 2020.
Joshi, S.; Goyal, S.; Reddy, M.S. Corn Steep Liquor as a Nutritional Source for Biocementation and Its Impact on Concrete Structural Properties. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018, 45, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wu, M.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, D.; Zhao, Y. Growth Environment Optimization for Inducing Bacterial Mineralization and Its Application in Concrete Healing. Construction and Building Materials 2019, 209, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Krishnapriya, S.; Venkatesh Babu, D.L.; G., P.A. Isolation and Identification of Bacteria to Improve the Strength of Concrete. Microbiological Research 2015, 174, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Castro-Alonso, M.J.; Montañez-Hernandez, L.E.; Sanchez-Muñoz, M.A.; Macias Franco, M.R.; Narayanasamy, R.; Balagurusamy, N. Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) and Its Potential in Bioconcrete: Microbiological and Molecular Concepts. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Devrani, R.; Dubey, A.A.; Ravi, K.; Sahoo, L. Applications of Bio-Cementation and Bio-Polymerization for Aeolian Erosion Control. Journal of Arid Environments 2021, 187, 104433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fattahi, S.M.; Soroush, A.; Huang, N. Biocementation Control of Sand against Wind Erosion. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2020, 146, 04020045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dubey, A.A.; Devrani, R.; Ravi, K.; Dhami, N.K.; Mukherjee, A.; Sahoo, L. Experimental Investigation to Mitigate Aeolian Erosion via Biocementation Employed with a Novel Ureolytic Soil Isolate. Aeolian Research 2021, 52, 100727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zomorodian, S.M.A.; Ghaffari, H.; O’Kelly, B.C. Stabilisation of Crustal Sand Layer Using Biocementation Technique for Wind Erosion Control. Aeolian Research 2019, 40, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Marvasi, M.; Mastromei, G.; Perito, B. Bacterial Calcium Carbonate Mineralization in Situ Strategies for Conservation of Stone Artworks: From Cell Components to Microbial Community. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Phillips, A.J.; Eldring, J. (Joe); Hiebert, R.; Lauchnor, E.; Mitchell, A.C.; Cunningham, A.; Spangler, L.; Gerlach, R. Design of a Meso-Scale High Pressure Vessel for the Laboratory Examination of Biogeochemical Subsurface Processes. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2015, 126, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cunningham, A.B.; Class, H.; Ebigbo, A.; Gerlach, R.; Phillips, A.J.; Hommel, J. Field-Scale Modeling of Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation. Comput Geosci 2019, 23, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ariyanti, D. Feasibility of Using Microalgae for Biocement Production through Biocementation. J Bioproces Biotechniq 2012, 02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jansson, C.; Northen, T. Calcifying Cyanobacteria—the Potential of Biomineralization for Carbon Capture and Storage. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 21, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yu, X.; Chu, J.; Yang, Y.; Qian, C. Reduction of Ammonia Production in the Biocementation Process for Sand Using a New Biocement. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 286, 124928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Porter, H.; Mukherjee, A.; Tuladhar, R.; Dhami, N.K. Life Cycle Assessment of Biocement: An Emerging Sustainable Solution? Sustainability 2021, 13, 13878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wu, C.; Chu, J.; Wu, S.; Hong, Y. 3D Characterization of Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation in Rock Fracture and the Resulted Permeability Reduction. Engineering Geology 2019, 249, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, Y.; Soga, K.; Dejong, J.T.; Kabla, A.J. Microscale Visualization of Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Processes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2019, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Oktafiani, P.G.; Putra, H.; Erizal; Yanto, D.H.Y. Application of Technical Grade Reagent in Soybean-Crude Urease Calcite Precipitation (SCU-CP) Method for Soil Improvement Technique. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 2022, 128, 103292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Omoregie, A.I.; Palombo, E.A.; Ong, D.E.L.; Nissom, P.M. Biocementation of Sand by Sporosarcina Pasteurii Strain and Technical-Grade Cementation Reagents through Surface Percolation Treatment Method. Construction and Building Materials 2019, 228, 116828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mutitu, K.D.; Munyao, M.O.; Wachira, M.J.; Mwirichia, R.; Thiong’o, K.J.; Marangu, M.J. Effects of Biocementation on Some Properties of Cement-Based Materials Incorporating Bacillus Species Bacteria – a Review. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials 2019, 8, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Montaño-Salazar, S.M.; Lizarazo-Marriaga, J.; Brandão, P.F.B. Isolation and Potential Biocementation of Calcite Precipitation Inducing Bacteria from Colombian Buildings. Curr Microbiol 2018, 75, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Perito, B.; Marvasi, M.; Barabesi, C.; Mastromei, G.; Bracci, S.; Vendrell, M.; Tiano, P. A Bacillus Subtilis Cell Fraction (BCF) Inducing Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: Biotechnological Perspectives for Monumental Stone Reinforcement. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2014, 15, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shu, S.; Yan, B.; Ge, B.; Li, S.; Meng, H. Factors Affecting Soybean Crude Urease Extraction and Biocementation via Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) for Soil Improvement. Energies 2022, 15, 5566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rohy, H.; Arab, M.; Zeiada, W.; Omar, M.; Almajed, A.; Tahmaz, A. One Phase Soil Bio-Cementation with EICP-Soil Mixing.; April 2019.
Zehner, J.; Røyne, A.; Sikorski, P. A Sample Cell for the Study of Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation at the Grain-Scale and Its Implications for Biocementation. Sci Rep 2021, 11, 13675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Guan, D.; Zhou, Y.; Shahin, M.A.; Khodadadi Tirkolaei, H.; Cheng, L. Assessment of Urease Enzyme Extraction for Superior and Economic Bio-Cementation of Granular Materials Using Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation. Acta Geotech. 2023, 18, 2263–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Miftah, A.; Khodadadi Tirkolaei, H.; Bilsel, H. Biocementation of Calcareous Beach Sand Using Enzymatic Calcium Carbonate Precipitation. Crystals 2020, 10, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hoang, T.; Alleman, J.; Cetin, B.; Choi, S.-G. Engineering Properties of Biocementation Coarse- and Fine-Grained Sand Catalyzed By Bacterial Cells and Bacterial Enzyme. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 04020030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Murugan, R.; Suraishkumar, G.K.; Mukherjee, A.; Dhami, N.K. Influence of Native Ureolytic Microbial Community on Biocementation Potential of Sporosarcina Pasteurii. Sci Rep 2021, 11, 20856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cardoso, R.; Pedreira, R.; Duarte, S.O.D.; Monteiro, G.A. About Calcium Carbonate Precipitation on Sand Biocementation. Engineering Geology 2020, 271, 105612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mahawish, A.; Bouazza, A.; Gates, W.P. Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Bio-Cementation of Coarse Aggregates. Acta Geotech. 2018, 13, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cardoso, R.; Pires, I.; Duarte, S.O.D.; Monteiro, G.A. Effects of Clay’s Chemical Interactions on Biocementation. Applied Clay Science 2018, 156, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ashraf, M.S.; Hassan Shah, M.U.; Bokhari, A.; Hasan, M. Less Is More: Optimising the Biocementation of Coastal Sands by Reducing Influent Urea through Response Surface Method. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 315, 128208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Graddy, C.M.R.; Gomez, M.G.; DeJong, J.T.; Nelson, D.C. Native Bacterial Community Convergence in Augmented and Stimulated Ureolytic MICP Biocementation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 10784–10793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cui, M.-J.; Zheng, J.-J.; Zhang, R.-J.; Lai, H.-J. Soil Bio-Cementation Using an Improved 2-Step Injection Method. Arab J Geosci 2020, 13, 1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sun, X.; Miao, L.; Wu, L.; Wang, C. Study of Magnesium Precipitation Based on Biocementation. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 2019, 37, 1257–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mahawish, A.; Bouazza, A.; Gates, W.P. Unconfined Compressive Strength and Visualization of the Microstructure of Coarse Sand Subjected to Different Biocementation Levels. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2019, 145, 04019033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wani, K.M.N.S.; Mir, B.A. A Laboratory-Scale Study on the Bio-Cementation Potential of Distinct River Sediments Infused with Microbes. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech. 2021, 8, 162–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tri Huynh, N.N.; Quynh Nhu, N.; Khanh Son, N. Developing the Solution of Microbially Induced CaCO ₃ Precipitation Coating for Cement Concrete. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 431, 062006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rao, M.V.S.; Reddy, V.S.; Sasikala, Ch. Performance of Microbial Concrete Developed Using Bacillus Subtilus JC3. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 2017, 98, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nguyen, H.N.T.; Nguyen, S.K. Use of Bio-Active Bacillus Subtilis Bacteria to Form Self-Healing Concrete. Sci. Tech. Dev. J. 2014, 17, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fang, C.; He, J.; Achal, V.; Plaza, G. Tofu Wastewater as Efficient Nutritional Source in Biocementation for Improved Mechanical Strength of Cement Mortars. Geomicrobiology Journal 2019, 36, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bhutange, S.P.; Latkar, M.V.; Chakrabarti, T. Studies on Efficacy of Biocementation of Cement Mortar Using Soil Extract. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 274, 122687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sun, X.; Miao, L.; Wu, L.; Chen, R. Improvement of Bio-Cementation at Low Temperature Based on Bacillus Megaterium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019, 103, 7191–7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kaur, G.; Dhami, N.K.; Goyal, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Reddy, M.S. Utilization of Carbon Dioxide as an Alternative to Urea in Biocementation. Construction and Building Materials 2016, 123, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Phua, Y.J.; Røyne, A. Bio-Cementation through Controlled Dissolution and Recrystallization of Calcium Carbonate. Construction and Building Materials 2018, 167, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wormser, G.P.; Stratton, C. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 9th Edition Edited by Patrick R. Murray, Ellen Jo Baron, James H. Jorgensen, Marie Louise Landry, and Michael A. Pfaller Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2007 2488 Pp., Illustrated. $209.95 (Hardcover). Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008, 46, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bacterial Endospores | CALS. Available online: https://cals.cornell.edu/microbiology/research/active-research-labs/angert-lab/epulopiscium/bacterial-endospores (accessed on 4 August 2023).
Gomez, M.G.; Graddy, C.M.R.; DeJong, J.T.; Nelson, D.C. Biogeochemical Changes During Bio-Cementation Mediated by Stimulated and Augmented Ureolytic Microorganisms. Sci Rep 2019, 9, 11517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Behzadipour, H.; Sadrekarimi, A. Biochar-Assisted Bio-Cementation of a Sand Using Native Bacteria. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2021, 80, 4967–4984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhao, Q.; Li, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, H.; Amini, F. A Full Contact Flexible Mold for Preparing Samples Based on Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation Technology. Geotech. Test. J. 2014, 37, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wen, K.; Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Bu, C.; Li, L. Development of an Improved Immersing Method to Enhance Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation Treated Sandy Soil through Multiple Treatments in Low Cementation Media Concentration. Geotech Geol Eng 2019, 37, 1015–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yu, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J. Mechanical Properties of Bio-Cementation Materials in Pre-Precipitation Mixing Process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2022, 29, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nething, C.; Smirnova, M.; Gröning, J.A.D.; Haase, W.; Stolz, A.; Sobek, W. A Method for 3D Printing Bio-Cemented Spatial Structures Using Sand and Urease Active Calcium Carbonate Powder. Materials & Design 2020, 195, 109032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Erdmann, N.; Kästner, F.; de Payrebrune, K.; Strieth, D. Sporosarcina Pasteurii Can Be Used to Print a Layer of Calcium Carbonate. Engineering in Life Sciences 2022, 22, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hirsch, M.; Lucherini, L.; Zhao, R.; Clarà Saracho, A.; Amstad, E. 3D Printing of Living Structural Biocomposites. Materials Today 2023, 62, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tian, Z.; Tang, X.; Xiu, Z.; Xue, Z. The Spatial Distribution of Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation in Sand Column with Different Grouting Strategies. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2023, 35, 04022437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
van Paassen, L.A.; Ghose, R.; van der Linden, T.J.M.; van der Star, W.R.L.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Quantifying Biomediated Ground Improvement by Ureolysis: Large-Scale Biogrout Experiment. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 2010, 136, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Harkes, M.P.; van Paassen, L.A.; Booster, J.L.; Whiffin, V.S.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Fixation and Distribution of Bacterial Activity in Sand to Induce Carbonate Precipitation for Ground Reinforcement. Ecological Engineering 2010, 36, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ginn, T.R.; Murphy, E.M.; Chilakapati, A.; Seeboonruang, U. Stochastic-Convective Transport with Nonlinear Reaction and Mixing: Application to Intermediate-Scale Experiments in Aerobic Biodegradation in Saturated Porous Media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2001, 48, 121–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sun, X.; Miao, L.; Chen, R. The Application of Bio-Cementation for Improvement in Collapsibility of Loess. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 2607–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cheng, L.; Shahin, M.A.; Cord-Ruwisch, R. Surface Percolation for Soil Improvement by Biocementation Utilizing In Situ Enriched Indigenous Aerobic and Anaerobic Ureolytic Soil Microorganisms. Geomicrobiology Journal 2017, 34, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yang, Y.; Chu, J.; Liu, H.; Cheng, L. Construction of Water Pond Using Bioslurry-Induced Biocementation. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2022, 34, 06021009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sun, X.; Miao, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, R.; Wu, L. Bio-Cementation for the Mitigation of Surface Erosion in Loess Slopes Based on Simulation Experiment. J Soils Sediments 2022, 22, 1804–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cheng, L.; Cord-Ruwisch, R. Upscaling Effects of Soil Improvement by Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation by Surface Percolation. Geomicrobiology Journal 2014, 31, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lai, H.-J.; Cui, M.-J.; Chu, J. Effect of PH on Soil Improvement Using One-Phase-Low-PH MICP or EICP Biocementation Method. Acta Geotech. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Joshi, S.; Goyal, S.; Reddy, M.S. Influence of Nutrient Components of Media on Structural Properties of Concrete during Biocementation. Construction and Building Materials 2018, 158, 601–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Williams, S.L.; Kirisits, M.J.; Ferron, R.D. Optimization of Growth Medium for Sporosarcina Pasteurii in Bio-Based Cement Pastes to Mitigate Delay in Hydration Kinetics. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2016, 43, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dhami, N.K.; Reddy, M.S.; Mukherjee, A. Significant Indicators for Biomineralisation in Sand of Varying Grain Sizes. Construction and Building Materials 2016, 104, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Heveran, C.M.; Liang, L.; Nagarajan, A.; Hubler, M.H.; Gill, R.; Cameron, J.C.; Cook, S.M.; Srubar, W.V. Engineered Ureolytic Microorganisms Can Tailor the Morphology and Nanomechanical Properties of Microbial-Precipitated Calcium Carbonate. Sci Rep 2019, 9, 14721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Soga, K.; DeJong, J.T.; Kabla, A.J. Microscale Investigations of Temperature-Dependent Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) in the Temperature Range 4–50 °C. Acta Geotech. 2023, 18, 2239–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Peterson, M.E.; Daniel, R.M.; Danson, M.J.; Eisenthal, R. The Dependence of Enzyme Activity on Temperature: Determination and Validation of Parameters. Biochem J 2007, 402, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aytekin, B.; Mardani, A.; Yazıcı, Ş. State-of-Art Review of Bacteria-Based Self-Healing Concrete: Biomineralization Process, Crack Healing, and Mechanical Properties. Construction and Building Materials 2023, 378, 131198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Joshi, K.A.; Kumthekar, M.B.; Ghodake, V.P. Bacillus Subtilis Bacteria Impregnation in Concrete for Enhancement in Compressive Strength. 03.
De Leeuw, N.H.; Parker, S.C. Surface Structure and Morphology of Calcium Carbonate Polymorphs Calcite, Aragonite, and Vaterite: An Atomistic Approach. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1998, 102, 2914–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, L.; Liu, H.; Xiao, Y.; Chu, J.; Xiao, P.; Wang, Y. Biocementation of Calcareous Sand Using Soluble Calcium Derived from Calcareous Sand. Bull Eng Geol Environ 2018, 77, 1781–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Choi, S.-G.; Park, S.-S.; Wu, S.; Chu, J. Methods for Calcium Carbonate Content Measurement of Biocemented Soils. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2017, 29, 06017015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
ASTM D2166/D2166M-16: Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil.
ASTM D1883-21: Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils.
ASTM D3441-16: Standard Test Method for Mechanical Cone Penetration Testing of Soils.
Wu, M.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, D.; Zhao, Y. Growth Environment Optimization for Inducing Bacterial Mineralization and Its Application in Concrete Healing. Construction and Building Materials 2019, 209, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
ASTM D2434-22: Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Coarse-Grained Soils.
ASTM D2435/D2435M-11(2020): Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading.
ASTM C1585-20: Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes.
ASTM D5856-15: Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Porous Material Using a Rigid-Wall, Compaction-Mold Permeameter.
Xu, X.; Guo, H.; Li, M.; Deng, X. Bio-Cementation Improvement via CaCO3 Cementation Pattern and Crystal Polymorph: A Review. Construction and Building Materials 2021, 297, 123478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cheng, L.; Cord-Ruwisch, R. In Situ Soil Cementation with Ureolytic Bacteria by Surface Percolation. Ecological Engineering 2012, 42, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Terzis, D.; Laloui, L. Cell-Free Soil Bio-Cementation with Strength, Dilatancy and Fabric Characterization. Acta Geotech. 2019, 14, 639–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Elmaloglou, A.; Terzis, D.; De Anna, P.; Laloui, L. Microfluidic Study in a Meter-Long Reactive Path Reveals How the Medium’s Structural Heterogeneity Shapes MICP-Induced Biocementation. Sci Rep 2022, 12, 19553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Maleki-Kakelar, M.; Azarhoosh, M.J.; Golmohammadi Senji, S.; Aghaeinejad-Meybodi, A. Urease Production Using Corn Steep Liquor as a Low-Cost Nutrient Source by Sporosarcina Pasteurii: Biocementation and Process Optimization via Artificial Intelligence Approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2022, 29, 13767–13781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mortazavi Bak, H.; Kariminia, T.; Shahbodagh, B.; Rowshanzamir, M.A.; Khoshghalb, A. Application of Bio-Cementation to Enhance Shear Strength Parameters of Soil-Steel Interface. Construction and Building Materials 2021, 294, 123470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yu, X.; Pan, X. Seawater Based Bio-Cementation for Calcareous Sand Improvement in Marine Environment. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bhaduri, S.; Debnath, N.; Mitra, S.; Liu, Y.; Kumar, A. Microbiologically Induced Calcite Precipitation Mediated by Sporosarcina Pasteurii. J Vis Exp 2016, 53253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Henze, J.; Randall, D.G. Microbial Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation at Elevated PH Values (>11) Using Sporosarcina Pasteurii. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2018, 6, 5008–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Optimizing the Use of Sporosarcina Pasteurii Bacteria for the Stiffening of Sand. Available online: http://www.envirobiotechjournals.com/article_abstract.php?aid=6965&iid=212&jid=1 (accessed on 4 August 2023).
Onal Okyay, T.; Frigi Rodrigues, D. Optimized Carbonate Micro-Particle Production by Sporosarcina Pasteurii Using Response Surface Methodology. Ecological Engineering 2014, 62, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Williams, S.L.; Kirisits, M.J.; Ferron, R.D. Influence of Concrete-Related Environmental Stressors on Biomineralizing Bacteria Used in Self-Healing Concrete. Construction and Building Materials 2017, 139, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dosier, G.K. Production of Masonry with Bacteria 2017.
Biolith® Tile from Biomason | Build with Biolith. Available online: https://biomason.com/biolith (accessed on 30 March 2023).
Lin, H.; Suleiman, M.T.; Brown, D.G.; Kavazanjian, E. Mechanical Behavior of Sands Treated by Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2016, 142, 04015066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Filet, A.E.; Gadret, J.-P.; Loygue, M.; Borel, S. Biocalcis and Its Applications for the Consolidation of Sands. 2012, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gomez, M.G.; Martinez, B.C.; DeJong, J.T.; Hunt, C.E.; deVlaming, L.A.; Major, D.W.; Dworatzek, S.M. Field-Scale Bio-Cementation Tests to Improve Sands. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement 2015, 168, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Phillips, A.J.; Troyer, E.; Hiebert, R.; Kirkland, C.; Gerlach, R.; Cunningham, A.B.; Spangler, L.; Kirksey, J.; Rowe, W.; Esposito, R. Enhancing Wellbore Cement Integrity with Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP): A Field Scale Demonstration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2018, 171, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Van Paassen, L.A. Biogrout, Ground Improvement by Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation. 2009. [Google Scholar]
Graddy, C.M.R.; Gomez, M.G.; Kline, L.M.; Morrill, S.R.; DeJong, J.T.; Nelson, D.C. Diversity of Sporosarcina -like Bacterial Strains Obtained from Meter-Scale Augmented and Stimulated Biocementation Experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3997–4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lee, M.; Gomez, M.G.; El Kortbawi, M.; Ziotopoulou, K. Effect of Light Biocementation on the Liquefaction Triggering and Post-Triggering Behavior of Loose Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2022, 148, 04021170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gomez, M.G.; Anderson, C.M.; Graddy, C.M.R.; DeJong, J.T.; Nelson, D.C.; Ginn, T.R. Large-Scale Comparison of Bioaugmentation and Biostimulation Approaches for Biocementation of Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2017, 143, 04016124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hang, L.; Gao, Y.; van Paassen, L.A.; He, J.; Wang, L.; Li, C. Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation for Improving the Internal Stability of Silty Sand Slopes under Seepage Conditions. Acta Geotech. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lai, H.-J.; Cui, M.-J.; Wu, S.-F.; Yang, Y.; Chu, J. Retarding Effect of Concentration of Cementation Solution on Biocementation of Soil. Acta Geotech. 2021, 16, 1457–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sohail, M.G.; Disi, Z.A.; Zouari, N.; Nuaimi, N.A.; Kahraman, R.; Gencturk, B.; Rodrigues, D.F.; Yildirim, Y. Bio Self-Healing Concrete Using MICP by an Indigenous Bacillus Cereus Strain Isolated from Qatari Soil. Construction and Building Materials 2022, 328, 126943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Achal, V.; Mukherjee, A.; Basu, P.C.; Reddy, M.S. Lactose Mother Liquor as an Alternative Nutrient Source for Microbial Concrete Production by Sporosarcina Pasteurii. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2009, 36, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chidara, R.; Nagulagama, R.; Yadav, S. Achievement of Early Compressive Strength in Concrete Using Sporosarcina Pasteurii Bacteria as an Admixture. Advances in Civil Engineering 2014, 2014, e435948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mirshahmohammad, M.; Rahmani, H.; Maleki-Kakelar, M.; Bahari, A. Performance of Biological Methods on Self-Healing and Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using S. Pasteurii. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2023, 30, 2128–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, H.K.; Park, S.J.; Han, J.I.; Lee, H.K. Microbially Mediated Calcium Carbonate Precipitation on Normal and Lightweight Concrete. Construction and Building Materials 2013, 38, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, H.-J.; Peng, C.-F.; Tang, C.-W.; Chen, Y.-T. Self-Healing Concrete by Biological Substrate. Materials 2019, 12, 4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chahal, N.; Siddique, R. Permeation Properties of Concrete Made with Fly Ash and Silica Fume: Influence of Ureolytic Bacteria. Construction and Building Materials 2013, 49, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chahal, N.; Siddique, R.; Rajor, A. Influence of Bacteria on the Compressive Strength, Water Absorption and Rapid Chloride Permeability of Concrete Incorporating Silica Fume. Construction and Building Materials 2012, 37, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zaerkabeh, R.; Sadeghi, A.M.; Afshin, H.; Majdani, R. Crack Healing and Mechanical Properties of Bacteria-Based Self-Healing Cement Mortar. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 2022, 66, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Abo-El-Enein, S.A.; Ali, A.H.; Talkhan, F.N.; Abdel-Gawwad, H.A. Application of Microbial Biocementation to Improve the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Cement Mortar. HBRC Journal 2013, 9, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metwally, G.A.M.; Mahdy, M.; Abd El-Raheem, A.E.-R.H. Performance of Bio Concrete by Using Bacillus Pasteurii Bacteria. Civ Eng J 2020, 6, 1443–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nasser, A.A.; Sorour, N.M.; Saafan, M.A.; Abbas, R.N. Microbially-Induced-Calcite-Precipitation (MICP): A Biotechnological Approach to Enhance the Durability of Concrete Using Bacillus Pasteurii and Bacillus Sphaericus. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xu, H.; Lian, J.; Gao, M.; Fu, D.; Yan, Y. Self-Healing Concrete Using Rubber Particles to Immobilize Bacterial Spores. Materials 2019, 12, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Qin, C.-Z.; Hassanizadeh, S.M.; Ebigbo, A. Pore-Scale Network Modeling of Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: Insight into Scale Dependence of Biogeochemical Reaction Rates. Water Resources Research 2016, 52, 8794–8810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bagga, M.; Hamley-Bennett, C.; Alex, A.; Freeman, B.L.; Justo-Reinoso, I.; Mihai, I.C.; Gebhard, S.; Paine, K.; Jefferson, A.D.; Masoero, E.; et al. Advancements in Bacteria Based Self-Healing Concrete and the Promise of Modelling. Construction and Building Materials 2022, 358, 129412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xiao, P.; Liu, H.; Stuedlein, A.W.; Evans, T.M.; Xiao, Y. Effect of Relative Density and Biocementation on Cyclic Response of Calcareous Sand. Can. Geotech. J. 2019, 56, 1849–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Schematic representation of influencing parameters on bio-cementation.

Figure 2. SEM images of CaCO3 crystals formed in; a) calcium chloride; b) calcium lactate; c) dissolved chalk solution, adapted with permission from Elsevier [64].

Figure 3. Chemical reactions of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation by nitrogen cycle bacteria.

Table 1. Selective literature employing Sporosarcina Pasteurii for soil stabilization treatment via injection method.

* X: Experiment has been performed, UCS: Unconfined Compressive Strength test.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Choose an area of interest and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer

Advancements in Exploiting Sporosarcina Pasteurii as Sustainable Construction Material: A Review

Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Bio-cementing Agents

1.2. Application Methods of Bio-cementation

1.3. Parameters That Influence Bio-cementation

1.4. Characterization Techniques

1.5. Focus of This Review and Bibliometric Analysis

2. Bio-cementation Mechanism

3. Sporosarcina Pasteurii (S. Pasteurii)

4. Recent advancements in exploiting S. Pasteurii

4.1. Soil Stabilization

4.2. Building Construction

5. Conclusions

5.1. Concluding Remarks

5.2. Future Reasearch Directions

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Funding

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Subscribe