1. Introduction
Diffeological spaces were introduced by Souriau [
5] as a generalization of differentiable manifolds. This setting includes not only finite-dimensional manifolds, but also manifolds with boundary, infinite-dimensional manifolds, leaf spaces of foliations or spaces of differentiable maps. The main reference is Iglesias-Zemmour’s book [
1]. Many fundamental results are exposed in nLab [
3] too.
A diffeological structure on a set
X is given by declaring which maps from open subsets of Euclidean spaces
into X are considered to be smooth. These maps are called the
plots of the diffeology (
Section 2). They can be seen as
n-dimensional curves,
, on
X. This contravariant idea differs from the covariant classical one of declaring which real maps
from a manifold
X are smooth. On the other hand, the idea of an atlas on a manifold is generalized by the notion of a
generating family of plots (
Section 4).
Our main result (Theorem 6.1) will be to give a categorical interpretation of a generating family, namely by proving that the diffeological space is the join of the family, that is, the push-out of the pull-back.
Most examples will be related to finite-dimensional manifolds.
2. Diffeological Spaces
A diffeology on the set X is a family of set maps called plots such that:
each plot is defined on an open subset of some Euclidean space , ;
any constant map belongs to ;
if belongs to and if is a -map, then the composition belongs to ;
the map belongs to if and only if it locally belongs to , that is, for each there exists some open subset such that belongs to .
Note that the domain U and the Euclidean space , , depend on the plot .
A diffeological space is a set X endowed with a diffeology .
Remark 2.1.
Diffeological spaces are considered to be of class . By changing by in Axiom (3) for some we could obtain a theory for diffeological spaces of class .
Example 2.2. Let M be a finite-dimensional manifold. The manifold diffeology is the collection of all -maps defined on open subsets of Euclidean spaces with values in M.
Example 2.3. Let R be any equivalence relation on the manifold M and let be the quotient map. We endow with the quotient diffeology where the map belongs to if it locally factors through some plot of the manifold diffeology on M.
Example 2.4. Let be any subset of the manifold M. We endow N with the subspace diffeology formed by the plots in the manifold diffeology such that .
The last two examples show that diffeology is a much more flexible setting than the classical one.
3. Smooth Maps
Definition 3.1. Let , be two diffeological spaces. A set map is smooth when implies .
Example 3.2. If are -manifolds endowed with the manifold diffeologies , , respectively, then the smooth maps between M and N as diffeological spaces are the -maps as differentiable manifolds.
Proposition 3.3. The composition of smooth maps is a smooth map.
Proposition 3.4. The quotient map of Example 2.3 is smooth. Moreover, a map is smooth if and only if the composition is smooth.
Corollary 3.5. A quotient map is a diffeomorphism if and only if it is bijective.
Proof. Let be the inverse map. Since is smooth, is smooth. □
Example 3.6. If is a subset endowed with the subspace diffeology of Example 2.4 then the inclusion map is smooth. Moreover, a map is smooth if and only if is smooth.
Example 3.7. By Axiom 3 of diffeology, the plots of a diffeology are smooth maps.
Definition 3.8. A diffeomorphism is a smooth map with a smooth inverse.
4. Generating Families
Definition 4.1. It is easy to check that the intersection of diffeologies on a set X is a diffeology on X. Then if is any family of set maps we can consider the smallest diffeology containing . We will say that is a generating family for the diffeology .
We will always assume that the family contains all the constant plots on X.
Example 4.2. Any atlas on a manifold M is a generating family of the manifold diffeology.
Example 4.3. Let be a diffeological space and let be a set map. The diffeology on Y generated by the maps , with , is called the final diffeology. It is formed by the maps that locally are of the form for some .
Example 4.4. Let be a diffeological space and let be a set map. The initial diffeology on X is the diffeology generated by the set maps such that .
Example 4.5. Let , be two diffeological spaces. The product diffeology on is the intersection of the initial diffeologies for the projections and .
Example 4.6. The coproduct diffeology on the disjoint union is the intersection of the final diffeologies for the inclusions and .
It is easy to check that the product and coproduct diffeologies verify the usual universal properties.
The following criterion of generation is very useful.
Theorem 4.7 ([
1] Art. 1.68).
Let the diffeology be generated by the family . A set map belongs to if and only if it locally factors through some element of (we assume that constant plots are all contained in ).
Moreover, a map is smooth if and only if for any in a generating family of .
5. Categorical Constructions
The category of diffeological spaces and smooth maps has limits and colimits. Here, we will show how to construct the pull-back, the push-out and the join of two smooth maps. Most times these maps will be plots of some diffeology on X.
5.1. Pull-Back
Let
,
be two smooth maps with the same codomain. The pull-back of
and
is the set
endowed with the subspace diffeology of the product diffeology on
.
The projections
and
induce smooth maps
which verify
and the universal property of a pull-back:
5.2. Push-Out
Let
,
be two smooth maps with the same domain. The push-out of
and
is the quotient
of the coproduct
by the equivalence relation
R generated by
The maps
and
verify
and the universal property of a push-out:
5.3. Join
Given two smooth maps
and
, it is an exercise to check that the push-out of the pull-back of
and
is diffeomorphic to the join
of
and
([
4]), defined as follows: there is a well-defined smooth map
and maps
and
such that
-
, ,
-
they verify the universal property
Analogously, given k maps , the join and the universal map are defined by induction.
Remark 5.1.
It is possible to define the join of an infinite number of plots, but we will not develop this idea, for the sake of simplicity.
Lemma 5.2. Let be a generating family. Then the universal map of the join is a quotient map.
Proof. Let be a plot on X. By Criterion 4.7, for each there exists a neighborhood such that factors through some . Hence it factors through the disjoint union and consequently through the join. □
6. Main Result
Next theorem is our main result.
Theorem 6.1. Let be a diffeological space. A family of plots is a generating family for if and only if there is a diffeomorhism commuting with the maps and the natural maps , that is for all i.
Proof. Let be a generating family. The map is surjective because generating families include all constant plots.
It is injective because means that either or , and , that is . Then is bijective and Corollary 3.5 applies. Hence is a diffeomorphism.
The converse statement follows from Lemma 5.2. □
Example 6.2. Let X be the disjoint union of a line and a point , endowed with the diffeology generated by the constant plot , , and the identity plot , , respectively. Clearly, .
Example 6.3. Let
X be the set
We consider the diffeology on
X generated by the two plots
Then
.
As we pointed out in [
2], this is not the
cross diffeology on
X induced by the manifold diffeology of
.
Example 6.4. The manifold diffeology on a manifold
M is the join of any atlas. More precisely, let
be an atlas on the manifold
. Then
where the open subsets
are glued by inclusions.
References
- Iglesias-Zemmour, Patrick. Diffeology. (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 185. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS) xxiii, 439 p. (2013).
- Macías-Virgós, Enrique; Mehrabi, Reihaneh. Mayer-Vietoris sequence for generating families in diffeological spaces. Indag. Math., New Ser. 34, No. 4, 661-672 (2023).
- nLab. Diffeological space. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/diffeological+space (viewed on August 28, 2023).
- Rijke, Egbert. The join construction, arXiv:1701.07538 (2017).
- Souriau, Jean-Marie. Groupes différentiels, in Differential Geometrical Methods in Mathematical Physics (Proc. Conf., Aix-en-Provence/Salamanca, 1979), Lecture Notes in Math. 836, Springer, Berlin, (1980), pp. 91–128.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).