A 20-year-old non-smoking female patient, with no significant personal pathological history and no need for chronic treatment presents to the hospital for dry cough in the last 6 months and an episode of low-grade hemoptysis. No clinically significant findings at the physical examination, well preserved cardio-respiratory status. In the clinical and paraclinical context, the following preliminary investigations were requested: laboratory tests (complete blood count, electrolytes levels, coagulation tests, inflammatory markers), sputum microscopy for non-specific bacteria and Koch’s bacillus, GeneXpert, chest radiography, electrocardiogram. The chest X-ray revealed a heterogeneous left pulmonary basal consolidation process, and the following imaging investigations, such as chest CT scan, found a left pulmonary lower lobe consolidation process with a tendency to cavitation, raising the suspicion of bacillary foci (
Figure 1). Sputum examination for Koch’s bacillus showed the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (9 AFB per 100 HPF), with positive GenExpert genetic testing (low detected) and no resistance detected. Specific investigations were further carried out by performing bronchoscopy with bronchial biopsy, which revealed periorificial congestive infiltrative lesions at the apical level of the left lower lobe, with the histopathological examination supporting the diagnosis of endobronchial tuberculosis. Anti-tuberculosis treatment regimen I was initiated as follows HIN 300 mg per day, RMP 600 mg per day, EMB 800 mg per day, PZM 1500 mg per day. In dynamic at T2 (negative AFB at the microscopic examination and cultures), the patient has a good radiological outcome but with symptoms persistence, so the decision is to continue the intensive phase until T3. At T3, bronchoscopic and imaging reassessment is performed. The bronchoscopy showed mutilating bronchial statics changes in the LIL segments, with punctiform stenosis of one of the segments. And the imaging exam revealed the persistence of the left pulmonary lower lobe consolidations processes with air bronchogram and bilateral non-calcified pulmonary micronodular lesions. It is decided to move on to the continuation phase of the treatment with a customised regimen as follows: HIN 600 mg per day, RMP 600 mg per day, EMB 1200 mg per day.At T8, the patient is clinically asymptomatic, endoscopically unchanged, due to the presence of the punctiform stenosis of the LIL segment, and at the imaging exam, the retrostenotic changes are persistent. At this moment, it is not deemed necessary to continue the tuberculostatic treatment, and no surgical therapy is recommended for the remaining lesions. Over the next 12 months, multiple episodes of retrostenotic pneumonia occur from time to time. Imaging shows a clear lesional dynamics (
Figure 2). Therefore, there is a suspicion of pulmonary malignancy including pulmonary sequestration syndrome, and further investigation by MR angiography of the thoracic aorta shows no aberrant arterial tracts from the thoracic aorta, left renal artery or the right atrium, specific to the pulmonary sequestration syndrome due to LIL consolidation (
Figure 3). Subsequently, a surgical left lower lobectomy was performed, with a good outcome and complete recovery (
Figure 4). Histopathological examination supports the diagnosis of tuberculous granulomas. And the pathology molecular examination revealed the presence of Isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis 1,2 via the following mutation c.947G>A; p.Gly316Asp, a mutation that has not been yet described in medical literature (
Figure 5). The patient’s outcome was good and it is not considered necessary to resume treatment. Drug resistance occurs when mutations or chromosomal replication errors occur in the genes encoding drug targeting or drug biotransformation mechanisms, and it has a significant impact on the efficacy of tuberculostatic therapy [
1,
2,
3,
4]. Isoniazid has potent bactericidal activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, primarily by inhibiting mycolic acid synthesis [
5,
6]. Isoniazid-resistance is associated with mutations in the furA-katG and fabG1-inhA operons, as well as mutations in the ahpC gene [
5,
7,
8,
9]. INH is a prodrug activated by the catalase-peroxidase enzyme encoded by the katG gene [
8]. Mutations in the katG gene, reducing the gene activity related to INH, are among the main mechanisms of the INH-resistance [
5,
8]. Alternatively, INH-resistance may arise due to point mutations within the promoter region of the inhA operon or the inhA gene. Mutation within the promoter region of inhA can lead to an overexpression of inhA, resulting in a relative resistance to INH. InhA mutations can be the cause of cross-resistance to ethionamide [
5,
8,
9]. 64% of the isoniazid-resistance phenotypes were associated with the katG315 mutation worldwide [
10,
11,
12]. Although more than 300 different katG mutations have been identified, mutations within codon 315 are the most prevalent [
11,
12]. Moreover, a specific amino acid substitution (from serine to threonine) is responsible for 95% of the katG 315 mutations [
12]. Mutations within the katG are associated with a wide range of moderate to high level Isoniazid-resistance [
10]. The second most common mutation is inhA-15, and it has been reported in 19% of the Isoniazid-resistant isolates [
12]. Mutations within the promoter region of inhA tend to result in a low-level phenotypic resistance. and they also confer resistance to second-line drugs, namely ethionamide and prothionamide [
11,
13]. The most prevalent mutation within the inhA promoter region is the c-15t mutation, which is present in a median of 19% of the clinically Isoniazid-resistant isolates worldwide [
10,
12].Mutations within the inhA promoter region were not associated with a poor outcome (treatment failure or death) of the first-line regimen I tuberculostatic treatment, although such mutations were associated with an increased risk of relapse. On the other hand, katG 315 mutations have been associated with a poor treatment outcome [
10,
14].These two mutations, katG315 and inhA-15, combined with ten of the most common mutations within the inhA promoter and ahpC-oxyR intergenic region explain 84% of the global Isoniazid-resistance phenotypes [
10]. In conclusion, the significant association between the two mutations, inhA c-15 and katG 315 respectively, and the high-level resistance is of interest in the interpretation of current and future molecular diagnostic testing, as an early prediction of the level of Isoniazid-resistance is essential to decide the benefit of high-dose Isoniazid use [
10]. LPA testing, such as MTBDRplus (Hain test), can reliably identify isolates containing these mutations and thus can predict the level of Isoniazid-resistance [
15,
16]. But an isolated katG or inhA mutation may suggest highly variable levels of minimum inhibitory concentration. Thus, inhA mutations do not always predict low resistance levels and katG mutations high resistance levels, so LPA testing may not be used to decide whether or not Isoniazid will be useful in a combination therapy regimen when only one of these mutations is detected [
10]. Moreover, further research is necessary to investigate the real benefits of high-dose Isoniazid use in patients with low or moderate resistance caused by only one of the two mutations [
10]. Local variability of the individual mutation frequency may limit the sensitivity of molecular diagnostic testing [
12]. Therefore, well-designed systematic surveys and whole genome sequencing are needed in order to identify mutation frequencies across geographic regions where rapid molecular testing is currently implemented, providing a context for the interpretation of the results and the opportunity to improve the next generation of diagnostic tests [
12].