1. Introduction
In the last hundred years, chrome tanning has been the dominant method of making leather due to both the economic advantages and ease to achieve versatile end products with high performances for many traditional and modern applications. Leather, the first biomaterial made by man, is still irreplaceable due to its properties unmatched by other synthetic materials. However, chrome tanning went into re-evaluation for its hazardous wastes contaminating water, soil and air, especially through the possible oxidation of Cr
3+ to Cr
6+, classified as a human carcinogen [
1,
2,
3]. Besides, around 4% chromium is found in the finished products [
4,
5] making leather practically non-biodegradable and difficult to be reused. Worldwide huge amounts of the chromium tanned leather wastes are discarded to landfills by the leather industries annually worldwide [
6,
7]. This means wasting of the contained proteinaceous resources while being a cause of environmental concern. On the other hand, wet-white tanning solution proved equally harmful, with aldehyde-based tannins demonstrating effects such as carcinogenic and teratogenic properties as the release of formaldehyde from commercial tanning agents. For example, glutaraldehyde- and oxazoline-based tanning agents cannot meet the formaldehyde limit, as these tanning agents continuously decompose and release formaldehyde during the production, storage and use of leather [
8]. In addition, bisphenol S-based polymers shown to have endocrine and estrogenic activity [
9,
10].
The tanning operation is the main contributor to the environmental impacts of a tanning system followed by retanning and fatliquoring operations. Thus, more sustainable tanning agents than chrome salts, bisphenol-based tannins and synthetic aldehydes have become the objective of much research in the last decades [
7,
11].
The Directive 2005/64/EC of the European Parliament on re-use, recycling and re-covery of vehicle parts and materials, as well as the continuously tightening regulatory framework for safer and cleaner chemicals and technologies (i.e. REACH, the regulation of the European Union, adopted to improve the protection of human health and the environment from the risks that can be posed by chemicals), push towards developing innovative metal-, aldehyde-, phenol-free tanning technologies. The increased customers demand for safe, durable and functional leather goods manufactured in a sustainable manner has created an opportunity for alternative tanning technologies based on safe and non-toxic bio renewable resources and nanomaterials as active compounds to play the role of new future auxiliaries for hide and leather treatments. Sustainable tanning technologies aiming at 100% biodegradable leather are highly sought to keep the image of leather as synonymous with quality, both aesthetic and functional, and sustainability, in compliance with the concept of ethical and moral purchase, which tends to replace the consumerism of previous decades.
In this context, we set out to develop and test a tanning agent based on sodium alginate, and test the ability of nano-HAp to impart flame retardant properties to leather with the aim of taking essential steps to obtain a biodegradable leather with superior mechanical, thermal and water resistance qualities.
The analysis of the literature revealed that the development of alginate oxidation approaches has expanded the potential of alginate applications, including the tanning industry as well [
12,
13,
14,
15,
16]. Alginates are considered one of the world's most abundant polysaccharides, accounting for up to 40% of the dry matter of a seaweed. At the same time, their industrial production is inexpensive. Alginates are anionic, linear copolymer consisting of block copolymers comprising of 1,4-linked β-D-mannuronic acid (M) with 4C1 ring conformation and α-L-guluronic acid (G) with 4C1 conformation, both in the pyranosic conformation and present in varying proportions [
17]. Due to their non-toxicity, non-carcinogenicity and biocompatibility with the human body, applications of alginates (in the form of alginic acid and its sodium or calcium salts) in food, cosmetics, medicine and tissue engineering have been extensively studied [
18]. Sodium alginate (SA) undergoes partial oxidation by NaIO
4/ KIO
4 and loses molecular weight while gaining more reactivity-higher aldehyde groups. Two of these groups form in each oxidized uronic acid subunit [
19,
20,
21]. The resulted oxidized sodium alginate (OSA) retains the water solubility and biocompatibility of alginate, while acquiring better biodegradability and molecular flexibility. In addition, it demonstrated ability to bind to collagen [
20,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27,
28].
The industrial use of periodate is currently limited by its relatively high cost, being only reluctantly used in applications on a large scale. Periodate may cause severe skin burns, eye damage, organ damage in case of prolonged exposure, it is very toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause fire or explosion (ECHA) [
29]. Therefore, according to the restrictive EU regulations on the use of chemicals (REACH regulation), environmental impact [Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC, Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC, Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU, the Circular Economy Package], the use of periodate must be limited [
30]. On the other hand, periodate combines high oxidation rates with optimized resource efficiency, thereby increasing the sustainability and industrial relevance of the process. In fact, it was reported that optimized setup could provide a technically robust, economically acceptable, and environmentally tolerable basis for production of dialdehyde cellulose on a larger scale using periodate, for several biorefinery scenarios in the pulp and paper industries [
31]. Very recently, a robust and self-cleaning electrochemical synthesis for the preparation and regeneration of periodate been reported, allowing for lower costs use of periodate in the synthesis of regulated products [
32].
Nanomaterials, due to their ability to penetrate into the fibres and interact with collagen, are excellent candidates for purposely modifying collagen, i.e. by increasing the hydrothermal stability of the leather [
33,
34] and improving its technological properties [
35,
36]. Nano hydroxyapatite (nano-HAp) is among the simplest materials to synthesize, starting from available and economical raw materials. Hydroxyapatite (Ca
10(OH)
2(PO
4)
6), a well-known member of the calcium phosphate family with high biocompatibility, is the major inorganic component of bone and teeth in vertebrates. Hence, hydroxyapatite materials have been extensively investigated for applications in biomedical fields [
37,
38,
39,
40]. Recent studies on hydroxyapatite show its effect on fire resistance and smoke suppression of polyurethane fire-retardant coating [
41,
42]. Novel bio-based flame-retardant composites containing nano-HAp have been recently syntetized [
43,
44,
45,
46]. Although hydroxyapatite has been used for imparting flame retardancy to several polymers it has never been tested as leather flame-retardant. Its suitability for use in the tanning process will enable substituting some of the current synthesis flame retardants, and especially the brominated (PBB, PBDE, HBCD, TBBPA, TBP) flame-retardants which were shown to be persistent in the environment, bioaccumulative in wildlife and humans, toxic to laboratory animals and wildlife, producing reproductive, developmental, and systemic effects in lab tests. Their use is restricted from July 2006 by the Restriction on Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive implemented by EU.
In the present study, the tanning ability of OSA, as well as the ability of nano-HAp to enhance leather flame resistance were tested. The tanning process was developed at laboratory and pilot-scale to test the process’s upscale potential.
First, we investigated the interaction between OSA and collagen at a laboratory scale and optimized certain crucial variables from the standpoint of sustainability, including the quantity of NaCl and KIO4. Investigations were also done into the relationship between the collagen-OSA matrix and the nano-HAp. With the ultimate goal of manufacturing a high-quality and reproducible leather, the process was shifted to pilot scale in the second step to identify and address variation between the lab and pilot scale.
Utilizing a variety of analytical techniques, the different levels of collagen structure in hide biomatrix and leather chemical matrix were targeted. At the mesoscopic, macroscopic, and molecular levels, the ability of OSA to interact with collagen and increase its hydrothermal stability has been assessed using the micro-DSC technique, and standard SR EN ISO 3380-2003 method, respectively [
48,
49]. The oxidation reactions on the -OH groups at the C-2 and C-3 locations of the uronic units of sodium alginate have been identified using the FTIR-ATR technique, and the interaction between nano-HAp and the collagen-OSA matrix has also been demonstrated by FTIR-ATR and SEM-EDS. Understanding water binding and molecular constraints in the collagen-OSA and collagen-OSA-nano-HAp matrices was achieved by the use of unilateral nuclear magnetic resonance (
1H NMR) approach. In order to demonstrate the uniformity of nano-HAp distribution throughout the leather structure, SEM-EDS analysis was also conducted. The fire test for aircraft materials was used to evaluate the fireproofing that nano-HAp imparts. Comparing the physical, chemical, and mechanical characteristics of commercial poly-aldehyde-tanned leather to OSA-tanned leather allowed for discussion.
4. Conclusions
We investigated innovative, commercially feasible, non-toxic, and biodegradable tanning (oxidized sodium alginate) and flame-retardant (nano-hydrohyapatite) agents in response to the pressing needs of the leather sector for the implementation of sustainable solutions. The suitability of sodium oxidized alginate (OSA) and nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HAp) as a tannin and flame-retardant, respectively, for use in a traditional wet-white process, was proven by laboratory and pilot-scale tests. The analytical findings we obtained supported the usefulness and adaptability of OSA as a wet white tanning agent. Its tanning ability was also demonstrated by a four-fold decrease in the molar ratio of sodium alginate (SA) to potassium periodate (KIO4), from 1:0.8 to 1:02, even with a reduction in salt (NaCl) content compared to the conventional method. Consequently, the effluents will have lower NaCl concentrations, very little unreacted KIO4, and pH value easy to neutralize.
Micro-DSC, 1H NMR, and FTIR-ATR were used to investigate the tanning mechanism and collagen interaction with hydroxyapatite. Based on our findings and those published in the literature, we hypothesized that electrostatic interactions occurred during the interaction of nano-HAp with collagen matrix. The hydrothermal stability of OSA-tanned leather was comparable to that of commercial leather, whereas the nano-HAp treatment resulted in an overall increase in thermal stability and strength of collagen matrix, as evidenced by the occurrence of a more stable collagen population corresponding to nano-HAp-bonded collagen matrix. A good improvement of fire resistant time of leather was achieved using a very low concentration of nano-HAp (1%). The leather prototypes produced by tanning with OSA showed a physical-mechanical behavior resembling that of commercial leather.
In conclusion, our findings meet some of the most pressing demands of the leather industry, paving the way for a much more sustainable tanning process (metal-, formaldehyde-, and phenol-free), and biodegradable leather using bio renewable resources (sodium alginate), as well as a low-cost and simple method of preparing nano-HAp without requiring a significant change in current technology.
Figure 1.
Micro-DSC denaturation peaks of samples tanned with (a) GA (black) and 12% NaCl; OSA1 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) and 12% NaCl (blue); OSA2 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) and 6% NaCl (red). (b) OSA2 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) and 6% NaCl (red); OSA3 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.2) and 6% NaCl (black).
Figure 1.
Micro-DSC denaturation peaks of samples tanned with (a) GA (black) and 12% NaCl; OSA1 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) and 12% NaCl (blue); OSA2 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) and 6% NaCl (red). (b) OSA2 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) and 6% NaCl (red); OSA3 (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.2) and 6% NaCl (black).
Figure 2.
1H CPMG decay curves (a, c, e) and transversal relaxation time (T2) distribution (b, d, f) calculated with inverse Laplace transform for S-GA1, S-OSA2 and S-OSA3.
Figure 2.
1H CPMG decay curves (a, c, e) and transversal relaxation time (T2) distribution (b, d, f) calculated with inverse Laplace transform for S-GA1, S-OSA2 and S-OSA3.
Figure 3.
Comparison of ATR-FTIR spectra of SA and OSA.
Figure 3.
Comparison of ATR-FTIR spectra of SA and OSA.
Figure 4.
ATR-FTIR spectra of raw hide (black), S-OSA2 (red), OSA (blue) in the 4000-400 cm-1 region. The region 1800-400 cm-1 is highlighted.
Figure 4.
ATR-FTIR spectra of raw hide (black), S-OSA2 (red), OSA (blue) in the 4000-400 cm-1 region. The region 1800-400 cm-1 is highlighted.
Figure 5.
Micro-DSC thermal denaturation peaks of collagen matrix in the samples treated with OSA (black); OSA and nano-HAp 1.0% (green); OSA and nano-HAp 1.5% (blue); OSA and nano-HAp 3.0% (red).
Figure 5.
Micro-DSC thermal denaturation peaks of collagen matrix in the samples treated with OSA (black); OSA and nano-HAp 1.0% (green); OSA and nano-HAp 1.5% (blue); OSA and nano-HAp 3.0% (red).
Figure 6.
SEM images taken form S-OSA3: A) grain, B) corium, C) cross-section.
Figure 6.
SEM images taken form S-OSA3: A) grain, B) corium, C) cross-section.
Figure 7.
SEM images of OSA-tanned samples wet-treated with 1% of nano-HAp: A) corium, B) grain, C) cross-section. For each image, the EDS analysis is reported in table.
Figure 7.
SEM images of OSA-tanned samples wet-treated with 1% of nano-HAp: A) corium, B) grain, C) cross-section. For each image, the EDS analysis is reported in table.
Figure 11.
(a) 1H CPMG decay curve of S-OSA8 and (b) transversal relaxation time (T2) distribution calculated with inverse Laplace.
Figure 11.
(a) 1H CPMG decay curve of S-OSA8 and (b) transversal relaxation time (T2) distribution calculated with inverse Laplace.
Figure 12.
FTIR-ATR spectra of leather before (S-PA1 and S-OSA7) and after the treatment with nano-HAp (S-PA2 and S-OSA8) in the 2000-400 cm-1 range.
Figure 12.
FTIR-ATR spectra of leather before (S-PA1 and S-OSA7) and after the treatment with nano-HAp (S-PA2 and S-OSA8) in the 2000-400 cm-1 range.
Figure 13.
FAR/JAR 25.853 vertical test; leather sample placed vertically on a gas flame.
Figure 13.
FAR/JAR 25.853 vertical test; leather sample placed vertically on a gas flame.
Figure 14.
Leather samples treated with nano-HAp (on the left side) and not-treated (on the right side) subjected to FAR/JAR 25.853 (vertical) test. The photographs were taken at 0 minutes, 20 minutes, and 40 minutes following leather contact with a gas flame for 60 seconds.
Figure 14.
Leather samples treated with nano-HAp (on the left side) and not-treated (on the right side) subjected to FAR/JAR 25.853 (vertical) test. The photographs were taken at 0 minutes, 20 minutes, and 40 minutes following leather contact with a gas flame for 60 seconds.
Table 1.
Hydrothermal stability parameters of tanned samples: shrinkage temperature (Ts) (measured by the SR EN ISO 3380-2003.13 method), and denaturation parameters measured by micro-DSC: onset temperature (Tonset), denaturation temperature (Tmax), peak half-width (ΔT1/2) and denaturation enthalpy (ΔH).
Table 1.
Hydrothermal stability parameters of tanned samples: shrinkage temperature (Ts) (measured by the SR EN ISO 3380-2003.13 method), and denaturation parameters measured by micro-DSC: onset temperature (Tonset), denaturation temperature (Tmax), peak half-width (ΔT1/2) and denaturation enthalpy (ΔH).
Sample symbol |
Tanning agent |
NaCl (%) |
Ts (°C) |
Tmax (°C) |
Tonset (°C) |
ΔH (J/g) |
ΔT1/2 (°C) |
S-GA1 |
commercial glutaraldehyde (GA) |
12 |
79 |
77.8 |
75.4 |
13.6 |
2.6 |
S-OSA1 |
OSA (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) |
12 |
88 |
85.2 |
82.3 |
12.8 |
3.2 |
S-OSA2 |
OSA (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) |
6 |
86 |
83.7 |
80.3 |
11.3 |
3.4 |
S-OSA3 |
OSA (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.2) |
6 |
84 |
82.9 |
80.1 |
10.2 |
3.5 |
Table 2.
NMR-MOUSE relaxometric parameters of the samples tanned with OSA and commercial glutaraldehyde (GA).
Table 2.
NMR-MOUSE relaxometric parameters of the samples tanned with OSA and commercial glutaraldehyde (GA).
Sample name |
Tanning agent |
T1 (ms) |
WA (%) |
T2A (ms) |
WB (%) |
T2B (ms) |
WC (%) |
T2C (ms) |
S-GA1 |
commercial glutaraldehyde (GA) |
30 |
85 |
0.220 |
12 |
0.815 |
3 |
15.0 |
S-OSA2 |
OSA (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.8) |
34 |
86 |
0.302 |
14 |
1.11 |
- |
- |
S-OSA3 |
OSA (SA:KIO4 molar ratio 1:0.2) |
31 |
64 |
0.176 |
32 |
0.521 |
- |
- |
Table 3.
Denaturation parameters of collagen matrix in the samples tanned with OSA and treated with different percentages of nano-HAp (1.0, 1.5, 3.0 %) measured by micro-DSC.
Table 3.
Denaturation parameters of collagen matrix in the samples tanned with OSA and treated with different percentages of nano-HAp (1.0, 1.5, 3.0 %) measured by micro-DSC.
Sample name |
nHAp (%) |
Tonset (°C) |
Tmax (°C) |
ΔH (J/g) |
ΔT1/2 (°C) |
S-OSA3 |
0 |
80.1 |
82.9 |
12.8 |
3.5 |
S-OSA4 |
1.0 |
74.6 |
77.5 |
18.0 |
3.6 |
S-OSA5 |
1.5 |
75.6 |
78.4 |
17.4 |
3.3 |
S-OSA6 |
3.0 |
76.2 |
79.4 |
18.5 |
3.5 |
Table 4.
Micro-DSC denaturation parameters of new leather prototypes compared to commercial leather before and after nano-HAp treatment (pilot scale): onset temperature (Tonset), denaturation temperature (Timax), peak half-width (ΔT1/2), denaturation enthalpy (ΣΔHi) and the percentage of the various collagen populations (%ΔHi).
Table 4.
Micro-DSC denaturation parameters of new leather prototypes compared to commercial leather before and after nano-HAp treatment (pilot scale): onset temperature (Tonset), denaturation temperature (Timax), peak half-width (ΔT1/2), denaturation enthalpy (ΣΔHi) and the percentage of the various collagen populations (%ΔHi).
Sample symbol |
Tanning agent/ nano-HAp |
Timax (°C) |
Tonset (°C) |
ΣΔHi (J·g−1) |
% ΔHi
|
ΔT1/2 (°C) |
S-OSA7 |
OSA (SA:KIO4 molar ratio of 1:0.2) |
T1=78.1 |
73.7 |
16.1 |
ΔH1 = 100 |
5.1 |
S-OSA8 |
OSA (SA:KIO4 molar ratio of 1:0.2) + nano-HAp (1%) |
T1=81.0 T2=76.8 |
72.1 |
17.5 |
ΔH1 = 28 ΔH2 = 72 |
7.1 |
S-PA1 |
commercial poly-aldehyde (PA) |
T1=76.7 |
72.7 |
18.1 |
ΔH2 = 100 |
4.7 |
S-PA2 |
commercial poly-aldehyde (PA) + nano-HAp (1%) |
T1=79.1 T2=76.7 |
71.5 |
20.6 |
ΔH1 = 26.0 ΔH2 = 74.0 |
7.2 |