3.1. Feature-Based Molecular Networking of the A. hookeri Leaves Extract
The leaves of
A. hookeri were extracted by 70% EtOH (3 times) to obtain the total crude extract. After being dried under a vacuum pump, the extract was suspended in water and loaded into a Daion HP-20 chromatography column. The column was eluted with 50%, 75%, and 100% MeOH/H
2O to obtain three fractions (H1–H3). The 70% EtOH extract and three fractions were dried and prepared at a concentration of 2mg/mL for HRESI-qTOF-MS/MS measurement in both positive and negative modes. The mass data were analyzed using MassHunter software and the results were shown in
Figure S1 (Supplementary Information) for positive mode. For molecular networking analysis, all data (in positive mode) were pre-processed using Mzmine 3 to obtain .csv and .mgf files. These files were then uploaded to the GNPS platform to create the feature-based molecular networking (FBMN). The result was visualized using Cytoscape, as shown in
Figure S2 (Supplementary Information) for the full network, and
Figure 1A for clusters of interest.
As shown in
Figure 1A, four clusters of interest were identified, including flavonoids-glycosides, amides, triterpenoids, and others. In the flavonoid-glycosides cluster, three compounds were annotated by the GNPS platform against the online database of GNPS, including apigenin-7-
O-glucuronide (
m/z 447 Da), (2S,3S,4S,5R,6S)-6-[2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5-hydroxy-4-oxochromen-7-yl]oxy-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid (
m/z 463 Da), and (2S,3S,4S,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-[5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-methoxy-4-oxochromen-7-yl]oxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid (
m/z 477 Da). The amide cluster displayed the presence of moupinamide (N-
trans-feruloyltyramine) (
m/z 314 Da), while the triterpenoids group was suggested to contain the compound
β-D-glucopyranoside, (3β,22β,25R)-26-(
β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-22-hydroxyfurost-5-en-3-yl
O-6-deoxy-α-
L-mannopyranosyl-(1->2)-
O-[6-deoxy-α-
L-mannopyranosyl-(1->4)] (
m/z 1031 Da). The mass data for each putative compound was analyzed in detail to understand their fragmentation pattern, which is exhibited in
Figure 1B. Among these annotated compounds, compounds
1, 7, and
10 were isolated to confirm their structures.
Compound
1, observed within the flavonoid-glycoside cluster at an
m/z value of 447.0899 Da (
Figure 1A), was characterized as apigenin-7-
O-glucuronide through comparison against GNPS libraries matching. Additionally, its identification was corroborated via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic, referencing previously documented literature data [
25]. Mass fragmentation analysis of compound
1 and the other identified nodes (black circle) within the flavonoid-glycosides cluster revealed the consistent presence of a glucuronic acid moiety, as evidenced by distinct
m/z differences of 176 Da in their primary fragments (
Figure 1B). A node of
m/z 461.1068 Da was not assigned against GNPS libraries. However, this node was clustered in the same group as compound
1, and the mass difference of 14 Da suggests that an additional methoxy (-OCH
3) replaced a hydroxy group. Compound
3 was then isolated, and the structure was confirmed as apigenin 7-
O-glucuronide methyl ester by NMR spectra, compared to the literature [
26], and mass fragmentation analysis (
Figure 3A). Similarly, compound
4, which shared the same
m/z value but different retention time as the annotated compound (2
S,3
S,4
S,5
R,6
S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-[5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-methoxy-4-oxochromen-7-yl]oxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid was further confirmed by its mass fragments and NMR data to be chrysoeriol-7-
O-
β-
D-glucuronide [
27]. The mass data of compound
5 (
m/z 491 Da) showed a loss of 191 Da, which is characteristic of a methyl-GlA, a methoxy (30 Da), and a hydroxy (17 Da). Additionally, a mass difference of 14 Da compared to compound
4 indicated that
5 had an additional methyl group attached in the GlA unit to form methyl GlA ester. Compound
5 was also purified, and the structure was confirmed by NMR and compared to the reference to be chrysoeriol-7-
O-
β-D-glucuronic acid methyl ester [
28]. Compound
9, situated within a flavonoid-aglycone cluster (
Figure 1A) and exhibiting an observed
m/z value of 313.1084 Da, was conclusively identified as 5,7,4′-trimethoxyflavone. This determination was based on its NMR spectroscopic data, well matching with the literature report [
29], and further supported by mass fragmentation analysis, which revealed the presence of a fragment with an
m/z of 287 Da [M – OCH
3]
+ as shown in
Figure 3A.
Figure 2.
(A) Chemical structures of compounds 1–10 from A. hookeri. (B) Key COSY (bold) and HMBC (red arrows) correlations of new compound 2 isolated from A. hookeri.
Figure 2.
(A) Chemical structures of compounds 1–10 from A. hookeri. (B) Key COSY (bold) and HMBC (red arrows) correlations of new compound 2 isolated from A. hookeri.
Figure 3.
(
A) Fragmentation analysis of isolated compounds. (
B) Chemical profiling of isolated compounds in the
A. hookeri leaves extract. Base peak chromatogram (BPC) of
Allium hookeri leaves recorded by HRESI-qTOF-MS/MS (positive mode). Compounds
1–10 were marked in the feature-based molecular networking displayed in
Figure 1 and their structures were shown in
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
(
A) Fragmentation analysis of isolated compounds. (
B) Chemical profiling of isolated compounds in the
A. hookeri leaves extract. Base peak chromatogram (BPC) of
Allium hookeri leaves recorded by HRESI-qTOF-MS/MS (positive mode). Compounds
1–10 were marked in the feature-based molecular networking displayed in
Figure 1 and their structures were shown in
Figure 2.
An analysis of the fragmentation of
7 suggested that it contained a methoxy unit due to the observation of a
m/z 30 Da (-OCH
3) loss. Following isolation, NMR elucidation, and comparison with the literature,
7 was identified as the same as the GNPS assignment of N-
trans-feruloyltyramine [
30]. Compound
6 (
m/z 284 Da) was located in the same cluster as
7 and showed a 30 Da mass difference, indicating the absence of the methoxy group compared to
7. Compound
6 was isolated, and its NMR confirmed the suggested its structure as paprazine [
31]. Compound
8 (
m/z 344 Da) suggested the presence of an additional methoxy compared to
7. The NMR of
8 was analyzed and compared with previous reports to identify it as
N-trans-feruloyl-3-
O-methyldopamine [
31].
In the triterpenoids cluster, compound
10 (
m/z 1031 Da) was suggested to be diosgenin-3-
O-[[β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→4)]-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1→4)]-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1→2)]]β-D-glucopyranoside. The mass fragmentation analysis agreed with the presence of two rhamose (Rham) units, as evidenced by the mass loss at
m/z 146 Da. It also contained two glucose (Glc) moieties, as indicated by the mass loss of
m/z 162 Da. After isolation, NMR analysis, and comparison to previous reports, the structure of
10 was confirmed to be annotated [
32]. Within this cluster, two nodes with
m/z values of 1033 Da were observed, differing by two hydrogens from compound
10, yet sharing identical fragments including those at 577, 739, and 885 Da. Mass loss analysis of these nodes indicated the presence of 2 Glc (-162 Da), 1 Rham (– 146 Da), and an Arabinose (Ara, – 148 Da). This information allows for two possible structural configurations, as displayed in
Figure S4A (Supplementary Materials). Similarly, a node at 869.4894 Da within the same cluster displayed fragments indicative of mass losses corresponding to two Rham (146 Da) and a Glc (162 Da). Compared to compound
10, this node exhibited a mass difference of 162 Da, suggesting the presence of an additional Glc. Consequently, this structure can be assigned to one of nine potential configurations, as illustrated in
Figure S4B (Supplementary Materials). Furthermore, within this cluster, two nodes were identified at
m/z 723.4238 and 723.4296 Da (with retention times of 8.15 and 13.36 minutes, respectively), indicating a 308 Da mass difference [= 162 (Glc) + 146 (Rham)] in comparison to compound
10. Mass fragmentation analysis of these two peaks was conducted and searched in Scifinder, revealing 19 possible structural candidates
(Figure S4C,D, Supplementary Materials). These predicted compounds vary in their absolute configurations, which cannot be discerned solely through mass analysis.
3.2. Isolation and Structural Elucidation of New Compound 2
The leaves of
A. hookeri were extracted by 70% EtOH (3 times) to obtain the total crude extract. The crude extract was further applied to various column chromatography methods to isolate ten compounds, including one new compound (
2) and nine known compounds (
1,
3–
10), as shown in
Figure 1. The chemical structures of known compounds were confirmed by mass analysis and comparison with previous reports, as mentioned above.
Compound
2 was obtained as a pale yellow powder with an established molecular formula of C
28H
30O
15, based on its negative HRESIMS at 605.1437 [M – H]
– (calcd for C
28H
29O
15 at 605.1585). In the FBMN, compound
2 was observed in a cluster of flavonoid-glycosides, suggesting that the structure of
2 has the same skeleton as identified flavonoid-glycosides. As shown in
Figure 3, mass fragmentation of
2 indicated that it contained one Rham (
m/z 146 Da) and one methyl-GlA (
m/z 190 Da) unit. The
1H NMR spectrum of
2 showed five aromatic proton signals at
δH 7.85 (2H, d,
J = 5.1 Hz), 7.20 (overlap), 7.19 (2H, overlap), 7.04 (1H, s), one olefinic proton at
δH 6.93 ppm, two anomeric signals at
δH 5.44 (1H, d,
J = 7.5 Hz) and 5.11 (1H, d,
J = 1.8 Hz), six oxygenated protons [
δH 4.65, t (7.8); 4.47, t (8.8); 4.52, t (8.8); 4.88, d (8.5); 4.84, br s; 4.58, d (7.7); 4.38, t (9.1); 4.80, m], one methoxy group (
δH 3.90, s) and one methyl group [
δH 1.18, d, (6.3)]. The
13C NMR data of
2 displayed 28 carbon signals, including one ketone (
δC 183.3), an ester carbon (
δC 170.4), fourteen aromatic signals (
δC 100.8–165.5), two anomeric carbons (
δC 100.0, 95.6), eight carbons bearing oxygen (
δC 70.6–78.7), and one methyl (
δC 19.4). The HMBC data of
2 confirmed the presence of a flavone moiety by the correlations in the two aromatic rings (
Figure 2B). The glucuronic acid attached to C-7 of the flavone moiety was revealed by the cross-peaks from H-1ʹ (
δH 6.03, d,
J = 7.3 Hz) to C-7 (
δC 163.7). The methoxy group attached to C-3ʹ was confirmed by the correlation from the methoxy proton signal (
δH 3.89, s) to aromatic carbon at
δC 148.8 ppm. The rhamnose sugar moiety was identified by the presence of a methyl group (
δH 1.18, d, (6.0)/
δC 18.0 ppm) and its correlation with carbon signals of sugar at
δC 69.4 and 73.0 ppm. The position of rhamnose moiety was represented by the correlation from H-1ʹʹʹ (
δH 6.45 ppm) to C-2ʹʹ (
δC 77.8 ppm). The absolute configuration of the sugar unit was determined following acid hydrolysis and compared with the authentic sugar. The retention time of the sugar derivative n
2 was consistent with that of authentic sugar. Therefore, the structure of
2 was identified as shown in
Figure 2, and named apigenin-7-
O-[
α-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1→2)]
β-
D-glucuronic acid methyl ester.
3.4. Bio-Activity of Isolated Compounds from A. hookeri
In our assay system, senescent human dermal fibroblast (HDF) or lung fibroblast (IMR-90) cells were induced by replicative exhaustion. SA-β-gal activity and SASP secretion were used to evaluate senomorphics activity. Positive SA-β-gal staining and overexpression of SASP factors such as IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1α were confirmed in replicative senescent HDF cells. Drugs that reduced SA-β-gal staining or inhibited expression of these SASP factors are thought to be senomorphics candidates.
Ten isolated compounds (
1–
10) from
A. hookeri were evaluated for their capacity in reducing NO production. The cell viability of these compounds was tested at 5 and 20
µM on LPS-induced NO production in RAW 264.7 cells compared to quercetin, a positive control. As a result, all compounds did not show any cytotoxicity up to 20
µM (
Figure 4A), and among them, compound
6 showed the best effect in reducing NO production (
Figure 4B). In addition, compounds
6–
8 shared similar structures, so their senomorphic effects in bleomycin (BLM)-senescent A549 cells were further evaluated. Two SASP markers, IL-6 and IL-8, were used to test senomorphic activity. As shown in
Figure 5A,B, compounds
6–
8 reduced the expression of both IL-6 and IL-8 in stress-induced senescent A549 cells that were exposed to 5
µM of BML after 6 days of treatment. The dose-dependent manner of each compound was also tested, and all compounds
6–
8 were found to have senomorphic effects by decreasing the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 (
Figure 5B). After 6 days of treatment, the SA-
β-gal staining was significantly reduced by 10
µM of all three compounds without any detected toxicity (
Figure 5C). Furthermore, the SASP inhibitory activities of
6–
8 in replicative senescent HDF cells were tested. The compounds were treated at 10
µM on replicative senescent HDF cells, which were confirmed to be senescence by positive SA-
β-gal staining (
Figure S52, Supplementary Materials) and upregulated SASP makers including IL-1α and IL-8. After 72 h of treatment, compounds
6–
8 significantly reduced the expression of IL-1α and IL-8 (
Figure 6A,B). Among them, compound
7 showed the best effect in replicative senescent HDF cells in a dose-dependent manner. As a result, compound
7 showed senomorphic activities in replicative senescent HDF cells at 5 and 10
µM by significantly reducing both IL-1α and IL-8 expression levels (
Figure 6C,D).