Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Detection of Avian Haemosporidian Parasites in Wild Birds in Slovakia

Altmetrics

Downloads

188

Views

86

Comments

1

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.tif (1.10MB )

Submitted:

18 January 2024

Posted:

19 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Haemosporidians are a group of vector-borne parasites belonging to the order Haemosporida. They infect avian hosts and require blood-sucking insects (Diptera) for their transmission. The occurrence and diversity of haemosporidian parasites are shaped primarily by the specificity of the parasite and the susceptibility of the host/vector. In this study, the presence and distribution of haemosporidians in blood samples from birds in urbanized and natural habitats were estimated using microscopic and molecular approaches. Birds in urbanized habitats were infected with four different species of Plasmodium: Plasmodium relictum, P. vaughani, P. matutinum, P. circumflexum, two different species of Haemoproteus: Haemoproteus majoris, H. parabelopolskyi, and Leucocytozoon sp. The species, H. attenuatus, H. concavocentralis, H. minutus, H. pallidus, H. noctue and H. tartakovskyi were additionally identified in birds in natural habitats. Typically, juvenile birds are essential markers of parasite species transmitted in the study area. The juveniles in the urbanized habitats carried the P. relictum, P. vaughani, P. circumflexum, H. parabelopolskyi, H. majoris, and Leucocytozoon species. The most abundant parasite was H. parabelopolskyi, which was found in both types of habitats. The prevalence of the Haemoproteus/Plasmodium species by nested PCR in birds in natural habitats (in totally 43.80%; 53/121) was significantly higher than that in birds in urbanized habitats (in totally 21.94%; 43/196) (p < 0.05), even in spring. There was no statistically significant difference between habitat types in overall infection rate of Leucocytozoon sp. (p > 0.05; 10/121 vs. 19/196), neither overall nor in the spring.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Parasitology

1. Introduction

Avian haemosporidians belonging to order Haemosporida (Alveolata, Apicomplexa, Sporozoa) are classified in four families Haemoproteidae (Haemoproteus), Plasmodiidae (Plasmodium), Leucocytozoidae ((Leucocytozoon), Garniidae. They are a group of vector-borne parasites that infect avian hosts and require blood-sucking insects (Diptera) as vectors and to complete their life cycle. Species of the genus Haemoproteus are transmitted by biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) and hippoboscid flies (Hippoboscidae), Plasmodium species by mosquitoes (Culicidae), Leucocytozoon species by simuliid flies (Simuliidae). Their life cycle is complicated as they change hosts, and ways of reproduction, and morphologically form different developmental stages [1,2]. Parasites can persist in birds for many years or in chronic stage even a lifetime, and they serve as a source of infection for vectors, which can also lead to the infection of offspring at the site during the breeding season/reproduction period. [1,3]
Most related studies in the past are based on blood smear microscopy, where a set of morphological characteristics served as the basis for species identification [1,2]. After the use of molecular methods in parasitology, the number of studies increased rapidly. The most frequently used protocol for the detection of haemosporidians is based on the cytochrome b (cyt b) gene, which was established by Hellgren et al. [4]. The routine application of PCR, followed by sequencing for detection and identification of haemosporidian lineages has led to a massive expansion in parasite genetic diversity of the parasites. Bensch et al. [5] created the MalAvi database [6], which summarizes unique 5123 parasite lineages and knowledge about their host ranges and geographical distributions facilitating understanding the evolutionary and ecological factors that drive this complex multi-host-multiparasite system.
Information on the occurance of haemosporidian parasites in Slovakia is currently limited. In the past, most studies on the presence of haemosporidians in Slovakia were based on the microscopy analysis of blood smears [3,7,8,9,10]. PCR and sequencing were used for the first time in Slovakia by Berthová et al. [11] and expanded by Šujanová et al. [12].
Here, we investigated the presence of haemosporidians in wild birds, both adults and juveniles, in Slovakia using microscopic and molecular approaches. In order to enrich the knowledge of the occurrence and distribution of haemosporidians in Slovakia, it is necessary to identify the species whose transmission takes place here; we compared the occurrence of haemosporidians in urbanized and natural habitats with local bird populations and migrating bird populations, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study sites

Birds were mist-netted in urbanized and natural habitat types (Figure 1) in Slovakia from April to August 2012 and from April to October 2013 in the morning ( in urbanized habitats in April, June, July, August 2012 and from April to October 2013; in natural habitat in April 2012). The birds were captured, ringed, blood sampled, and released under the permission of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic No. 9368/2011-2.2. Bratislava and Prievidza represent urbanized habitats in city areas, with anthropogenic activities such as walking, cycling, hiking, and horsing. Bratislava is located in the Small Carpathian Mountains in the southwest of Slovakia at 202 – 334 m above sea level (asl), (259 m above sea level, 48°10' N 17°03' E),. It is characterized by deciduous woodlands, oaks in lower altitudes and beech in higher altitudes. The Prievidza district (289 m asl 48°47' N 18°34' E), located in central Slovakia, is a forest-steppe rural area with Carpathian oak-hornbeam woods. Both study sites are characteristic by local bird populations. Drienovec (181 m asl, 48°10´N, 17°03´E) represents a natural habitat with an ornithological observatory for research of migratory birds, situated far from a city area and free from significant human activity. It is a forest-steppe natural area (181 m asl) in the Slovak Karst National Park in southeast Slovakia with submediterranean xero-thermophilous oak woods and colline limestone grasslands [13,14].

2.2. Mist-netting and sampling birds

After ringing the birds, the sex and age of each individual were determined using the field guide by Svensson [15] and Hromádko et al. [16,17,18]. A small amount of blood (approximately 50 µl) was taken by puncture of the vena ulnaris cutanea using a 1 ml X-tra-fine needle (HMD Healthcare, UK), and the blood smears were prepared, while the rest of the blood was stored in 96% ethanol. All birds were released immediately after sampling. All first-year individuals captured in the calendar year of hatching were considered juveniles. A total of 346 birds representing 42 species from 18 families were caught, including 114 juveniles [14]. Blood was collected from 317 individual birds.

2.3. Microscopic analysis of haemosporidian

A drop of blood was used to prepare the blood smears, and two thin smears were prepared for each individual of 302 birds. All smears were air-dried, fixed in methanol (96%), and stained with Giemsa stain as described in Valkiūnas [1]. The smears were examined by a Leica DM4500B microscope (Germany), and pictures were taken with a Leica DFC480 camera (Germany). Approximately 100 fields were scanned under ×400 magnification, and then at least of 100 fields were examined under high magnification (×1000) (oil immersion). The intensity of parasitaemia was determined according to the count of infected blood cells per 10,000 erythrocytes as follows: low (1-10 parasites), medium (11-100 parasites), and high (more than 100 parasites) according to Valkiūnas [1]. Pictures for the identification of parasites were edited using the program Leica Image Manager (Germany). Determination of the haemosporidians was performed based on keys for morphological identification developed by Valkiūnas [1,2]. The smears were deposited at the Institute of Virology, Biomedical Research Center, SAS, Bratislava.

2.4. Molecular analysis of haemosporidian

DNA from the 317 blood samples was extracted using a NucleoSpin® Tissue commercial kit (Macherey–Nagel, Germany). Approximately 50 µl of the blood stored in ethanol was transferred to a sterile 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube, and the ethanol was allowed to evaporate. When the blood was completely dry, 200 µl of lysis buffer B3 and 25 µl of proteinase K were added. The mixture was gently vortexed and incubated at 70 °C for 1 hour. The following procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and the quality of the DNA were assessed using a NanoPhotometer Pearl (Implen, Germany). The DNA samples were stored at -20 °C until the analyses. The presence of blood parasites was examined by a nested PCR assay targeting the cyt b gene mtDNA according to Bensch et al. [19] and Hellgren et al. [4]. Briefly, in the first step, HaemNFI and HaemNR3 primers were used to amplify the 617 bp fragment. In the second step, the nested PCR with primers HaemF and HaemR2 amplified 480 bp fragments of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium, and the set of HaemFL and HaemR2L primers amplified a 478 bp fragment of Leucocytozoon. Sterile distilled water was used as a negative control, and the samples previously detected as PCR-positive and confirmed by sequencing [11] were used as positive controls. For the separation and visualization of the PCR products, 1 % agarose gel stained with DNA Stain G (Serva, Germany) was used. The PCR products of the expected size were considered positive and sent for the purification and sequencing of both DNA strands to Macrogen (The Netherlands; http://www.macrogen.com). All the cyt b sequences were edited in MEGA6 software [20] and identified by performing a nucleotide blast in GenBank on NCBI [21]. The obtained sequences were compared with those in the MalAvi database [5,6]. Sequences of poor quality were marked as unusable sequences (us), and sequences with double peaks, which denote co-infections, were marked as dp.
Samples that were microscopically positive for haemosporians were examined for the intensity of haemosporidian infection using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) that targeted 182 bp fragment of the cyt b gene [22]. All reactions were carried out using GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega, USA) on a CFX96 real-time thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The following cycling conditions were used: 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s and 64 °C for 35 s with a plate read, followed by a final melt curve analysis using the instrument’s default settings [12]. A synthetic double-stranded DNA product (Eurofins Genomics, France) designed from a 220 bp fragment of the conserved rDNA region of Plasmodium relictum (accession number NC012426) was used as the positive control [22]. The synthetic DNA was diluted to a starting concentration of 106 copies/µl. The starting solution was serially diluted 10-fold to prepare a series of solutions from the 106 copies of genomic DNA (gDNA) per µl down to 1 copy/µl. All samples were run in duplicates [13]. Parasite intensity, which refers to the number of parasite DNA copies per 100 avian red blood cells, was determined for each sample based on the qPCR data and sample DNA concentration following the method of Friedl & Groscurth [23], with the assumption that the average genome size of a passerine bird was 2.8 pg [24].

2.5. Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted to test the differences between the prevalence of birds trapped in urbanized and natural habitats with the χ2 test (p = 0.05) using Past version 2.17b software [25]. We calculated 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for each proportion individually [26].

3. Results

3.1. Haemosporidian infections based on the microscopical and molecular analyses

Overall, the most frequently captured bird species was the Eurasian blackcap, Sylvia atricapilla (60/346; 17.3 %). However, of the birds captured in natural habitats, the most frequently captured species was the European robin Erithacus rubeculla (42/121; 34.71%), and of the birds captured in urbanized habitats the great tit Parus major (37/225; 16.44%), (Figure 2).
The presence of haemosporidian parasites on the blood smears was detected in 52/302 individuals (17.22%). The most abundant species was H. parabelopolskyi on blood smears of 21 birds (Figure 3a), which is a host specific primarily to the black cap Sylvia atricapilla, and it was detected in birds from both habitat types. The second most abundant species was H. attenuatus(Figure 3b), which was detected on blood smears of 13 bird samples obtained from only one host species, the European robin E. rubeculla, and only in birds from the natural habitats. No haemosporidians were identified in 18 bird samples. Plasmodium meronts were detected on blood smears of five birds. Leucocytozoon was detected only on blood smears of 2 individuals.
Parasite DNA by nested PCR was detected in 125/317 individuals (39.43%; CI 32.8-47.0%) of 18 bird species. Parasites of the genera Haemoproteus and Plasmodium were present in 96 individuals (30.28 %; CI 25.2-35.3 %), and parasites of the genus Leucocytozoon were present in 29 individuals (9.15 %; CI 6.0-12.3%), Table 1. Thirteen birds (4.10 %; CI 1.9-6.3%) were co-infected, Table 1.
The infection rate of the genera Haemoproteus and Plasmodium in the birds caught in natural habitats was found to be 43.80% (53/121; CI 34.8-53.1%). The overall infection rate of the birds from urbanized habitats was in totally 21.94% (43/196; CI 16.4-28.4%), and in spring 10.67% (8/75; CI 4.7-19.9%). The prevalence of the Haemoproteus/ Plasmodium species in the birds in natural habitats was significantly higher than that of the birds in urbanized habitats, in total and in spring (p < 0.05). Of the birds in natural habitats, 8.26% (10/121; CI: 4.0-14.7%) were infected with Leucocytozoon; in total 9.69% (19/196; CI: 5.9-14.7%), in spring 8.00% (6/75; CI 3.0-16.6%) of the birds in urbanized habitats were infected with Leucocytozoon. There was no statistically significant difference in overall infection rates for Leucocytozoon neither overall nor in the spring (p > 0.05). Co-infections were found in total 3.57% (7/196; CI 1.5-7.2%), in spring in 1.33% (1/75; CI 0.0-7.2%) of the birds in urbanized habitats and in 4.96% (6/121; CI 1.8-10.5%) of the birds in natural habitats, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).
All 125 positive samples (PCR products of expected size) were sequenced. After comparing the obtained 81 sequences with known sequences in the GenBank and MalAvi databases, we identified twelve species: H. attenuatus, H. concavocentralis, H. majoris, H. minutus, H. pallidus, H. parabelopolskyi, H. noctues, H. tartakovskyi, P. circumflexum, P. relictum, P. vaughani, and P. matutinum. Sequences from 16 individuals were unusable, and 2 samples showed double peaks, indicating co-infections (Table S1).
Birds from the urbanized habitats were infected with six Haemoproteus spp./ Plasmodium spp. (evaluated by nested PCR based on cyt b), and birds from the natural habitat were infected with nine Haemoproteus spp./ Plasmodium spp. The most abundant parasite species in the birds from the urbanized habitats were H. majoris CWT4 lineage (100%, 1/1) recorded in S. communis, P. vaughani SYAT05 in 6/9 (66.67%) T. merula followed by H. parabelopolskyi SYAT01, SYAT02, SYAT07, SYAT10 lineages, with a prevalence of 39.29% in S. atricapilla, P. circumflexum SYABOR02 lineage (21.74%) in E. schoeniculus, P. relictum SGS1 lineage (10.00%) in P. major, P. montanus, C. caeruleus, S. atricapilla, and P. matutinum LINN1 lineage (8.82%) in T. merula, E. rubecula and E. schoeniculus birds. . In the birds from the natural habitats, H. parabelopolskyi SYAT01, SYAT02 lineages infections were also the most prevalent (40.63%) in S. atricapilla, followed by H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage (15.91%) in E. rubecula, C. carduelis, E. schoeniculus, S. atricapilla and T. philomelos birds, P. relictum SGS1, DP, COLL1 lineages (8.16%) in E. cia, E. rubecula, P. montanus, F. coelebs, P. circumflexum TURDUS1 lineage (6.52%) in E. rubecula and E. citronella, H. pallidus SYAT03 lineage (3.77%) in E. rubecula, C. carduelis and H. noctue CIRCUM01 (2.38%) in E. rubecula. H. concavocentralis HAWF2 lineage was recorded in 1/3 (33.33%) C. coccothraustes, H. tartakovskyi HAWF1 lineage also in 1/3 C. coccothraustes (33.33%), H. minutus TURDUS2 lineage in 1/4 (25%) T. merula, P. vaughaini SYAT05 lineage in 2/4 (50%) T. merula, and P. matutinum LINN1 lineage in 1/4 (25%) T. merula. Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi was detected in birds from both habitat types but only in one host Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla. Interestingly, we found this parasite in the blood of a seven-year-old female, which was confirmed by ringing data from 2006. Otherwise, H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage was present in a wide range of hosts (five species), though only in birds captured in the natural habitats (Table S1). No unique lineages were recorded.
Birds with long-distance migration were infected with H. parabelopolskyi SYAT01, SYAT02, SYAT07 and SYAT10 lineages, H. majoris CWT4 lineage, H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage, Haemoproteus sp. LWT1 lineage, P. relictum SGS1 lineage, and Leucocytozoon sp. PARUS4 lineage. In birds with short-distance migration and nonmigratory birds was identify the presence of H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage, H. concavocentralis HAWF2 lineage, H. minutus TURDUS2 lineage, H. pallidus SYAT03 lineage, H. noctue CIRCUM01, H. tartakovskyi HAWF1 lineage, Haemoproteus sp. CCF1, CCF2, CCF6, EMCIR01 lineages, P. relictum SGS1, COLL1 lineages, P. vaughani SYAT05 lineage, P. matutinum LINN1 lineage, Plasmodium circumflexum TURDUS1, BT7, SYBOR02 lineages, and Leucocytozoon sp. PARUS4, PARUS18, PARUS19, PARUS28, PARUS50, STUR1/TURPEL01, PRUMOD01, BT2, BT5, SFC8, SYCON06 and SCORUS01 lineages.
Parasite intensity using qPCR analysis was verified with 52 microscopically positive samples. The intensity varied from 1 to 15,000 DNA copies per 100 avian red blood cells in both types of habitats. Low parasitemia (1-10 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes) estimated from blood smears by microscopy corresponded on average to 1-1,000 DNA copies per 100 avian red blood cells. Low parasitemia was recorded in E. rubecula, S. atricapilla, T. merula, S. curruca, F. coelebs, P. major bird species infected with H. parabelopolskyi SYAT01, SYAT02, SYAT05, SYAT10 lineages, H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage, P. relictum COLL1 lineage and Haemoproteus sp. CCF1 lineage. Medium parasitemia (11-100 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes) estimated from blood smears by microscopy corresponded on average to 1,000-10,000 DNA copies per 100 avian red blood cells. Medium parasitemia was identified in E. rubecula birds infected with H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage and in S. atricapilla infected with H. parabelopolskyi SYAT01, SYAT02 lineages. And, the high parasitemia (more than 100 parasites per 10,000 erythrocytes) estimated from blood smears by microscopy corresponded on average more than 10,000 DNA copies per 100 avian red blood cells. The high parasitemia was found in E. rubecula birds infected with H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage and in T. merula P. matutinum LINN1 lineage
Co-infection with more haemosporidian genera was detected in 4.10% of the individuals (13/317; CI 1.9-6.3%). Co-infections with Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon parasites were detected in five birds, and co-infections with Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon were detected in eight individuals, by microscopy and molecular biology (Table 2). Co-infections with Haemoproteus and Plasmodium were not analyzed in detail in this study.

3.2. Haemosporidian infections in juvenile birds based on the microscopical and molecular analyses

Important markers of haemosporidians transmitted in Slovakia include juvenile birds captured in urbanized habitats. In our study based on PCR, out of 114 juveniles, 26 were infected with Haemoproteus/ Plasmodium (22.81%; CI 15.1-30.5%), 8 were infected with Leucocytozoon (7.02%; CI 2.3-11.7%) and 6 carried co-infections (5.26%; CI 1.2-9.4%). Juvenile great tit Parus major, Eurasian blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus, and Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla caught in urbanized habitats carried P. relictum SGS1 lineage, and the common blackbird T. merula carried P. vaughani SYAT05 lineage, the song thrush Turdus philomelos was infected with P. circumflexum SYBOR02 lineage, the Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla was infected with H. parabelopolskyi SYAT02 lineage, and the common whitethroat Sylvia communis was infected with H. majoris CWT4 lineage. The lack of gametocytes made species determination by microscopy impossible for six PCR-positive juveniles the yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella, the common blackbird T. merula, and the common chaffinch Fringilla coelebs that were infected with Haemoproteus spp. The European robin Erithacus rubecula and the common blackbird T. merula were infected with Plasmodium spp., and Leucocytozoon spp. was found in the great tit P. major, the Eurasian blue tit C. caeruleus, the common blackbird T. merula, the Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla, and the song thrush T. philomelos.
Mature gametocytes were confirmed by microscopy in the peripheral blood of 11 juvenile birds: H. parabelopolskyi in 6 Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla, P. vaughani in one the common blackbird T. merula, Haemoproteus sp. in one yellowhammer E. citrinella, two S. atricapilla and Plasmodium sp. in one the European robin E. rubecula.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we aimed to extend knowledge about the presence of haemosporidians in the blood samples of birds in urbanized and natural habitats and identify which species are transmitted in Slovakia using microscopy and molecular detection. Here, we report ten species of haemosporidian parasites detected in the birds in Slovakia. We detected more different species in the birds in the natural habitats, where most of the birds were migratory species compared to those in the urbanized habitats with local populations (Table 1). In combination with suitable vectors, infected birds could serve as reservoirs of infection for other birds (because of share the same habitat for breeding, rest and at night). Differences in prevalence may be due not only to vectors and hosts, but also to abiotic environmental factors such as precipitation and mean annual temperature [27,28,29,30,31]. In our study, birds caught in the natural habitats had significantly higher infection rates than those of the local populations in the urbanized habitats. The highest haemosporidian infections were recorded in the Eurasian blackcap, the great tit, the common chaffinch, the common blackbird, and the Eurasian blue tit, and these results are related to host abundance and are similar to the results of Šujanová et al. [12]. As previously reported, Haemoproteus species is the most frequently reported haemosporidian parasite in birds, and this result is not limited to Slovakia [32,33,34,35].
To find out which parasites are transmitted in Slovakia; it was necessary to carry out an analysis of juveniles. Unlike adult birds, which can become infected in any year or locality, young birds in their first year of life (before autumn migration) can be infected only by parasites actively transmitted by vectors in their breeding area [1,3,7,8]. In the populations in the natural habitats, the juveniles were not mist-netted, so their infection status remains unknown. Unlike in the local populations in the urbanized habitats, in the caught juveniles, the blood analysis showed the presence of H. parabelopolskyi, H. majoris, P. circumflexum, P. vaughani, P. relictum, and Leucocytozoon sp.
Haemoproteus parasites are the most diverse group of avian haemosporidians [2,35]. Due to limited knowledge of life cycles and tissue merogony of the majority of Haemoproteus species, these pathogens usually have been considered benign [36]. However, recent molecular studies indicate that they may cause severe and even lethal diseases if infections occur in non-adapted avian hosts [37]. The findings in our study about H. parabelopolskyi and H. balmorali were interesting whereas H. parabelopolskyi was the most numerous species found only in the Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla and H. attenuatus was the second most prevalent Haemoproteus found in 5 host species. H. parabelopolskyi was the most numerous species found (24 individuals infected). This species is a strict host specialist in the Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla [38]. However, H. parabelopolskyi can be occasionally found in birds of the Acrocephalidae family [2]. We recorded the occurrence of this parasite in both habitat types, which was likely due to the fact that the Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla is one of the most numerous bird species in Slovakia. Evidence of the presence of a suitable vector was confirmed by the infections in eight juveniles. Interesting for us was the finding of a seven-year-old female Eurasian blackcap S. atricapilla infected with this parasite. The infection was confirmed by microscopy, PCR, and sequencing. Microscopy showed a very low intensity of infection, and together, the ability of active flight predicted the chronic stage of infection. Although the time of the individual´s infection is unknown, this discovery supports the need for monitoring on the site when birds are migrating. In contrast, H. attenuatus (the second most prevalent Haemoproteus species, with 14 infected individuals from 5 host species) was detected in the natural habitat only even though these species were common in the other habitats. H. attenuates ROBIN1 lineage is closely related to several lineages of H. balmorali which also parasitize birds of Muscicapidae. In our study, obtained sequence fragments showed 100% identity with the sequences annotated in the database as both H. balmorali and H. attenuatus, microscopic analysis confirmed the presence of H. attenuatus. Hauptmanová et al. [9] noted the presence of this parasite for the first time in Slovakia in the blood of a European robin (E. rubecula) caught in the eastern part of Slovakia. Unfortunately, the authors did not specify the number of infected birds. Šujanová et al. [12] identified ROBIN1 lineage in addition in Cyanistes caeruleus, Poecile palustris, Turdus iliacus and Prunella modularis bird species. Thus, the host species reported for H. attenuates has been extended. As vertebrate hosts of H. attenuatus, Hernández-Lara [39] summarized some species of the order Passeriformes (Muscicapidae, Certhiidae, Acrocephalidae, Sylviidae and Turdidae, Coraciformes (Alcenidae), and as vector Diptera (Ceratopogonidae) species Culicoides festivipennis, C. obsoletus, C. nubeculosus which also occur in Slovakia and neighboring countries [40]. This could be a marker for the presence of a suitable vector in the east of the country, but to verify this premise, other studies should confirm or disconfirm this proposition.

5. Conclusions

This study contributes to the knowledge about the prevalence, and morphological and molecular richness of haemosporidian parasites circulating in free-living birds in urbanized and natural habitats in Slovakia. The prevalence of the Haemoproteus/ Plasmodium species in birds in natural habitats was significantly higher than that in birds in urbanized habitats (p < 0.05), although the prevalence of Leucocytozoon was not higher for urban habitats, neither overall nor in the spring. In 42 avian species 12 haemosporidian species H. attenuatus, H. concavocentralis, H. majoris, H. minutus, H. pallidus, H. parabelopolskyi, H. noctue, H. tartakovskyi, P. circumflexum, P. relictum, P. vaughani, and P. matutinum were identified. However, the species H. majoris, H. parabelopolskyi, and three Plasmodium species: P. circumflexum, P. relictum, and P. vaughani were also present in the juveniles, indicating the presence of suitable vectors and active local transmission of parasites in Slovakia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org. Table S1: List of the haemosporidian parasites detected by cyt b molecular analysis in the blood samples of the birds from urbanized and natural habitats (us - unusable sequences, dp - double peaks). Numbers in parentheses refer to the number of positive birds of a given lineage.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, Lenka Minichová and Eva Špitalská; Funding acquisition, Eva Špitalská; Investigation, Lenka Minichová, Vladimír Slobodník, Roman Slobodník, Milan Olekšák and Zuzana Hamšíková; Methodology, Lenka Minichová and Eva Špitalská; Project administration, Eva Špitalská; Supervision, Ľudovít Škultéty and Eva Špitalská; Writing – original draft, Lenka Minichová; Writing – review & editing, Eva Špitalská. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic and Slovak Academy of Science, grant number VEGA 2/0021/21. .

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the first and corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethical standards

The experiments presented in this paper comply with the current laws of the Slovak Republic. Birds were captured, ringed, blood sampled and released under the permission of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic No. 9368/2011-2.2.

References

  1. Valkiūnas, G. Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Valkiūnas, G.; Iezhova, T.A. Keys to the avian Haemoproteus parasites (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae). Malaria Journal 2022, 21, 269. [CrossRef]
  3. Kučera, J. Blood parasites of birds in Central Europe. 1.Survey of literature. The incidence in domestic birds and general remark to the incidence in wild birds. Folia Parasitologica 1981a, 28, 13-22.
  4. Hellgren, O.; Waldenström, J.; Bensch, S. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bensch, S.; Hellgren, O.; Pérez-Tris, J. MalAvi: A public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 9, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. MalAvi database. Available online: http://130.235.244.92/Malavi/index.html (accessed on 28 November 2023).
  7. Kučera, J. Blood parasites of birds in Central Europe. 2. Leucocytozoon. Folia Parasitologica 1981b, 28, 193-203.
  8. Kučera, J. Blood parasites of birds in Central Europe. 3. Plasmodium and Haemoproteus. Folia Parasitologica 1981, 28, 303–312. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hauptmanová, K.; Benedikt, V.; Literák, I. Blood Parasites in Passerine Birds in Slovakian East Carpathians. Acta Protozool. 2006, 45, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
  10. Haas, M.; Kisková, J. Absence of blood parasites in the Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris. Oecologia Montana 2010, 19, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  11. Berthová, L.; Országhová, Z.; Valkiūnas, G. The first report of nine species of haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida: Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon) in wild birds from Slovakia. Biologia 2012; 67, 931-933. [CrossRef]
  12. Šujanová, A.; Špitalská, E.; Václav, R. Seasonal dynamics and diversity of haemosporidians in a natural woodland bird community in Slovakia. Diversity 2021, 13, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kazimírová, M.; Hamšíková, Z.; Kocianová, E.; Marini, G.; Mojšová, M.; Mahríková, L.; Berthová, L.; Slovák, M.; Rosá, R. Relative density of host-seeking ticks in different habitat types of south-western Slovakia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 69, 205–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Berthová, L.; Slobodník, V.; Slobodník, R.; Olekšák, M.; Sekeyová, Z.; Svitálková, Z.; Kazimírová, M.; Špitalská, E. The natural infection of birds and ticks feeding on birds with Rickettsia spp. and Coxiella burnetii in Slovakia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 68, 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Svensson, L. Identification guide to European passerines, 4th ed.; Lars Svensson, Stockholm. 1992.
  16. Hromádko, M.; Horáček, J.; Chytil, J.; Pithart, K.; Škopek. J. Guide to the determination of our passerines, Publisher ZUV, Hradec Králové (in Czech). 1992.
  17. Hromádko, M.; Horáček, J.; Chytil, J.; Pithart, K.; Škopek. J. Guide to the determination of our passerines, Publisher ZUV, Hradec Králové (in Czech). 1993.
  18. Hromádko, M.; Horáček, J.; Chytil, J.; Pithart, K.; Škopek. J. Guide to the determination of our passerines, Publisher ZUV, Hradec Králové (in Czech). 1998.
  19. Bensch, S.; Stjernman, M.; Hasselquist, D.; Ostman, O.; Hansson, B.; Westerdahl, H.; Pinheiro, R.T. Host specificity in avian blood parasites: A study of plasmodium and haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2000, 267, 1583–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A., Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725-2729. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. GenBank database. Available online: http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 22 February 2023).
  22. Bell, J.A.; Weckstein, J.D.; Fecchio, A.; Tkach, V.V. A new real-time pcr protocol for detection of avian haemosporidians. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Friedl, T.W.P.; Groscurth, E. A real-time PCR protocol for simple and fast quantification of blood parasite infections in evolutionary and ecological studies and some data on intensities of blood parasite infections in a subtropical weaverbird. J. Ornithol. 2012, 153, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tiersch, T.R.; Wachtel, S.S. On the evolution of genome size of birds. J. Hered. 1991, 82, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeo. Electronica 2001, 4, 4, http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.
  26. EasyCalculation. Available online: https://www.easycalculation.com/statistics (accessed on 22 February 2023).
  27. Basto, N.; Rodríguez, O.A.; Marinkelle, C.J.; Gutiérrez, R.; Matta, N. Haematozoa in birds from La Macarena National Natural Park (Colombia). Caldasia. 2006, 28, 371–7. [Google Scholar]
  28. Doussang, D., González-Acuña, D., Torres-Fuentes, L.G. et al. Spatial distribution, prevalence and diversity of haemosporidians in the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 2. [CrossRef]
  29. Ciloglu, A.; Ergen, A.G.; Inci, A.; Dik, B.; Duzlu, O.; Onder, Z.; Yetismis, G.; Bensch, S.; Valkiūnas, G.; Yildrim, A. Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites at an intersection point of bird migration routes: Sultan Marshes National Park, Turkey. Acta Trop. 2020, 210, 105465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Quillfeldt, P.; Arriero, E.; Martínez, J.; Masello, J.F.; Merino, S. Prevalence of blood parasites in seabirds- a review. Front Zool. 2011, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chakarov, N.; Kampen, H.; Wiegmann, A.; Werner, D.; Bensch, S. Blood parasites in vectors reveal a united blackfly community in the upper canopy. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Schumm, Y.R.; Bakaloudis, D.; Barboutis, C.; Cecere, J.G.; Eraud, C.; Fischer, D.; Hering,J. ; Hillerich, K.; Lormée, H.; Mader, V.; Masello, J.F.; Metzger, B.; Rocha, G.; Spina, F.; Quillfeldt, P. Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in wild bird species of the order Columbiformes. Parasitol. Res., 2021, 120, 1405–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Carlson, J.; Martínez-Gómez, J.E.; Valkiūnas, G.; Loiseau, C.; Bell, D.A.; Sehgal, R.N. Diversity and phylogenetic relationships of hemosporidian parasites in birds of Socorro Island, México and their role in the re-introduction of the Socorro Dove (Zenaida graysoni). J Parasitol 2013, 99, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Heym, E.C.; Kampen, H.; Krone, O.; Schäfer, M.; Werner, D. Molecular detection of vector-borne pathogens from mosquitoes collected in two zoological gardens in Germany. Parasitol Res 2019, 118, 2097–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Valkiūnas, G.; Ilgūnas, M.; Bukauskaitė, D.; Chagas, C.R.F.; Bernotienė, R.; Himmel, T.; Harl, J.; Weissenböck, H.; Iezhova, T.A. Molecular characterization of six widespread avian haemoproteids, with description of three new Haemoproteus species. Acta Tropica 2019, 197, 105051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bennet, G.F.; Peirce, M.A.; Ashford, R.W. Avian haematozoa: mortality and pathogenicity. J. Nat. Hist. 1993, 27, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ortiz-Catedral, L.; Brunton, D.; Stidworthy, M.F.; Elsheikha, H.M.; Pennycott, T.; Schulze, C.; Braun, M.; Wink, M.; Gerlach, H.; Pendl, H.; Gruber, A.D.; Ewen, J.; Pérez-Tris, J.; Valkiūnas, G.; Olias, P. Haemoproteus minutus is highly virulent for Australasian and South American parrots. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pérez-Tris, J.; Hellgren, O.; Križanauskienė, A.; Waldenström, J.; Secondi, J.; Bonneaud, C.; Fjeldsȧ, J.; Hasselquist, D.; Bensch, S. Within-Host Speciation of Malaria Parasites. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hernández-Lara, C.; Duc, M.; Ilgūnas, M.; Valkiūnas, G. Massive Infection of Lungs with Exo-Erythrocytic Meronts in European Robin Erithacus rubecula during Natural Haemoproteus attenuatus Haemoproteosis. Animals 2021, 11, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. de Jong Y (2016). Fauna Europaea. Fauna Europaea Consortium. Checklist dataset. accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-01-12. [CrossRef]
Preprints 96762 g001
Figure 1. Map showing study areas: urbanized habitat (1 – Bratislava, 2 – Prievidza), and natural habitat (3 – Drienovec) [14].
Figure 1. Map showing study areas: urbanized habitat (1 – Bratislava, 2 – Prievidza), and natural habitat (3 – Drienovec) [14].
Preprints 96762 g001
Preprints 96762 g002
Figure 2. Frequencies of the avian species captured in urbanized (UH) and natural (NH) habitats in Slovakia.
Figure 2. Frequencies of the avian species captured in urbanized (UH) and natural (NH) habitats in Slovakia.
Preprints 96762 g002
Preprints 96762 g003
Figure 3. Microscopical findings of gametocytes of Haemosporidium (a) Gametocytes of H. parabelopolskyi (SAYT01 lineage) in the blood of the Eurasian blackcap Sylvia atricapilla; (b) Gametocytes of H. attenuatus (ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage) in the blood of the European robin Erithacus rubecula.
Figure 3. Microscopical findings of gametocytes of Haemosporidium (a) Gametocytes of H. parabelopolskyi (SAYT01 lineage) in the blood of the Eurasian blackcap Sylvia atricapilla; (b) Gametocytes of H. attenuatus (ROBIN1/LULU1 lineage) in the blood of the European robin Erithacus rubecula.
Preprints 96762 g003
Table 1. Haemoproteus/Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon infections in birds.
Table 1. Haemoproteus/Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon infections in birds.
Bird species Infected with Haemoproteus/ Plasmodium/ Analyzed Infected with Leucocytozoon/ Analyzed Infected with Haemoproteus/ Plasmodium/ Analyzed Infected with Leucocytozoon/ Analyzed
Urbanized habitats Natural habitats
Parus major 5/37 12/37
0/6
3/9
1/28
1/4
15/32
1/4
0/32
Poecole montanus 1/6
Cyanistes caeruleus 1/9
Sylvia atricapilla 15/28
Sylvia communis 1/1 0/1
Sylvia curruca 1/4 0/4
Fringilla coelebs 4/6 0/6
0/1
1/9
0/10
0/15
1/2
1/6		 1/3 0/3
Emberiza citrinella 1/1 2/4 0/4
Turdus merula 8/9 4/4 0/4
Erithacus rubecula 1/10 19/42
1/2		 5/42
0/2
Emberiza schoeniculus 3/15
Turdus philomelos 2/2 1/1 0/1
Prunella modularis 1/6
Carduelis carduelis 3/11 0/11
Coccothraustes
coccothraustes 		2/3 3/3
Scolopax rusticola 1/1 1/1
Emberiza cia 1/2 0/2
Passer montanus 1/2 0/2
other
Total		 0/66
43/196		 0/66
19/196		 0/6
53/121		 0/6
10/121
Table 2. List of birds co-infected with haemosporidian parasites. Identified lineages are listed.
Table 2. List of birds co-infected with haemosporidian parasites. Identified lineages are listed.
Avian species Haemosporidian species
Urbanized habitats
Turdus merula P. vaughani SYAT05, L. sp.
Cyanistes caeruleus P. relictum SGS1, L. sp. PARUS19
Parus major P. relictum SGS1, L. sp. PARUS4
Parus major P. relictum SGS1, L. sp. PARUS18
Parus major P. relictum SGS1, L. sp. STUR1/TURPEL01
Sylvia atricapilla P. sp., L. sp. PARUS4
Turdus philomelos P. circumflexum BT7, L. sp.
Natural habitats
Erithacus rubecula H. sp., L. sp. BT2
Scolopax rusticola H. sp., L. sp.
Erithacus rubecula H. attenuatus ROBIN1/LULU1, L. sp. SFC8
Coccothraustes coccothraustes H. tartakovskyi sp. HAWF1, L. sp.
Erithacus rubecula P. circumflexum TURDUS1, L. sp. SYCON06
Coccothraustes coccothraustes H. concavocentralis HAWF2, L. sp.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated