Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Glutathionyl Hemoglobin and Its Emerging Role as a Clinical Biomarker of Chronic Oxidative Stress

Altmetrics

Downloads

75

Views

26

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

20 October 2023

Posted:

23 October 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Hemoglobin is one of the proteins that are more susceptible to S-glutathionylation and the levels of its modified form, glutathionyl hemoglobin, increase in several human pathological conditions. The scope of the present review is to provide knowledge about how hemoglobin is subjected to be S-glutathionylated and how this modification affects its functionality. The different diseases that showed increased levels of glutathionyl hemoglobin and the methods used for its quantification in clinical investigations will be also outlined. Since there is a growing need for precise and reliable methods of markers of oxidative stress in human blood, this review highlights how glutathionyl hemoglobin is more and more emerging as a good indicator of severe oxidative stress but also as a key pathogenic factor in several diseases.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress, caused by an imbalance between oxygen reactive species (ROS) accumulation in cells and the ability of scavenging systems to remove these reactive products, plays a major role in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases. Additionally, the disease severity and progression are linked to the entity of damage to various biological structures, namely cellular membranes, lipids, proteins and nucleic acids [1,2]. There are several human diseases where the involvement of oxidative stress has been well documented, including cancer [3,4], diabetes [5], rheumatoid arthritis [6], atherosclerosis [7], cardiovascular disease [8], neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [9,10] and pulmonary, renal, and hepatic diseases [11,12,13]. In the case of neurodegenerative diseases, the initiation or the progression is particularly vulnerable to ROS due to the high metabolic rate, unique lipid composition, and minimal cell turnover of the nervous system. Oxidative stress could be also a causative player in diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and ischemia-reperfusion injuries, considering that copper and iron, able to generate hydroxyl radicals starting from hydrogen peroxide or superoxide, show high levels in specific brain areas [14]. In addition, oxidative stress is well known to be involved in the pathogenesis of certain lifestyle-related disorders, such as hypertension [15], diabetes [16], atherosclerosis [17] and rheumatoid arthritis [18].
Given the strong correlation between oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of several diseases, there is a progressively increasing interest in identifying biomarkers for pathological conditions related to oxidative stress, with the aim of obtaining an accurate evaluation of oxidative stress levels and exploring the efficacy of antioxidant strategies. Among the different systems involved in cell and tissue protection from oxidative damage, glutathione, the main intracellular low-molecular-weight thiol molecule, plays a crucial role. This biological redox agent is able to shield thiol groups of proteins from irreversible oxidation and inactivate ROS, thus reducing and preventing damage caused by free radicals. Glutathione can undergo reduction (GSH), oxidation (GSSG) or binding to different proteins through disulfide bond formation obtaining glutathionylated proteins [19]. Although reversible, this posttranslational modification (PTM) has the potential to escalate as a pathological condition, as observed in the S-glutathionylation of actin during prolonged oxidative stress in Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA). The impact of this continuous modification of actin is to impair its polymerization capacity and its affinity for tropomyosin, compromising the stability of actin filaments and causing a dysregulation of the cytoskeleton [20]. Moreover, in Alzheimer’s disease S-glutathionylation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) prevents the correct functioning of this protein involved in the glycolytic pathway [21]. Therefore, considering that specific proteins are involved in each disease, PTMs such as S-glutathionylation could contribute to the manifestation of neurodegenerative diseases as well as other disorders associated with oxidative damage [22,23]. Between the several proteins that may undergo S-glutathionylation, hemoglobin has captured the attention of scientists because of both the high susceptibility of red blood cells to oxidative damage and the pivotal role played by glutathione in protecting erythrocytes from oxidative stress. Indeed, oxidative stress to hemoglobin could induce the formation of hemichromes and heme degradation products, thus leading to inflammatory processes and tissue damage [24]. To counteract this harmful scenario, glutathione neutralizes ROS using enzymes, like glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione reductase (GR) and maintains the redox state of hemoglobin avoiding the generation of damaging methemoglobin [24]. Starting from this evidence, glutathionyl hemoglobin (HbSSG), in which glutathione binds mainly to the cysteine residue Cys93 of β hemoglobin chain by a disulfide bond, has been largely investigated as a protective response against oxidative damage, and its quantification is vital in clinical research because HbSSG reflects the body efforts to counteract the impact of ROS. Indeed, in clinical investigations, HbSSG levels appear to be higher in different oxidative stress-related pathological conditions, including chronic renal failure, diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia (HLD), FRDA and iron deficiency anemia (IDA), compared to healthy subjects. Under physiological condition about 4% of hemoglobin is glutathionylated, whereas the maximum enhancement of glutathionylation has been detected in DM combined with microangiopathy, suggesting a direct correlation between HbSSG concentration and levels of oxidative stress [25,26,27]. Hence, it has been highlighted and confirmed the potential of HbSSG as a biomarker linked to several pathologies related to oxidative stress. Its quantification can be obtained using different methods characterized by distinct sensitivity and applications, such as liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, cation-exchange high-pressure liquid chromatography with UV detection, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Choice of the most suitable method to be used in different analysis is strictly related to specificity, sensitivity and research objectives to be achieved [19]. Research of advancing methods for HbSSG quantification is still ongoing with the aim of advancing redox biology insights and improving patient care.
Therefore, starting from an accurate examination of the literature, this review will focus on the potentialities of HbSSG as a clinical serum marker related to oxidative stress conditions, investigating its concentrations in several diseases in which oxidative stress plays a pivotal role and examining various methods used to quantify this modified protein. Indeed, an accurate measurement of HbSSG represents an essential requirement to use it as a clinical biomarker, as well as in clinical trials, in order to verify the effectiveness of tested treatments.

2. Protein S-Glutathionylation

Glutathione, the main low-molecular-weight cell thiol, is a pivotal antioxidant molecule within mammalian cells, able to contrast oxidizing molecules that alter the cell antioxidant system, such as hydrogen peroxide. Indeed, following the elimination of the oxidizing molecules, the oxidized glutathione (GSSG) is reconverted into its reduced state (GSH) by GR that uses NADPH as a cofactor [28,29]. The reversible PTM based on the formation of a disulfide bond between the cysteine of glutathione and protein cysteines is called protein S-glutathionylation, and represents one of the S-thiolation forms. This modification is able to communicate changes in the redox state related to GSH and GSSG levels to the cell [28,30]. In particular, S-glutathionylation can occur mostly either by direct oxidation (for instance, in the presence of ROS) (1) or through the thiol-disulfide exchange process between GSSG and thiol groups of targeted proteins (2) [30,31]. Other mechanisms are possible, because like protein thiols, the cysteine of GSH can be activated through the formation of glutathione sulfenic acid (GS-OH) resulting in protein S-glutathionylation (3) [32,33]. Also, less common mechanisms are described like the thiosulfinate derivative of GSH (GS(O)SG) or S-nitrosothiols such as GSNO that could be able to react with protein cysteines or protein thiosulfinates that could react with GSH [34]:
Protein –SH + GSH → Protein-SSG (1)
Protein –SH + GSSG ⇆ Protein-SSG + GSH (2)
Protein –SH + GS-OH → Protein-SSG (3)
In reaction (1) a surface protein sulfhydryl (Protein –SH) becomes activated by ROS through the formation of cysteine sulfenic acid (Protein–S–OH) or cysteine thiyl radical (Protein–S•) and then undergoes S-glutathionylation reacting with GSH. In reaction (2) protein sulfhydryl (Protein –SH) deprotonates to a thiolate anion (Protein –S-) in a basic microenvironment, attacking the sulfhydryl of intracellular GSSG, with the subsequent formation of disulfide (Protein –SSG). In reaction (3), besides the formation of glutathione sulfenic acid (GS-OH), the cysteine of GSH can be activated also in the form of glutathione disulfide S-oxide (GS(O)SG) or S-nitrosothiols such as GSNO [34]. Following the onset of oxidative stress condition, part of GSH is used to eliminate free radicals, thus leading to a reduction in GSH concentration and an increase of GSSG level. The decrease of GSH/GSSG ratio promotes protein glutathionylation, which avoids the irreversible oxidation of protein thiol groups. Upon returning to normal redox condition, since it is a reversible modification, S-glutathionylation could be reverted by the thiol-disulfide exchange reverse reaction (deglutathionylation) spontaneously or catalyzed by specific enzymes, called protein thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases [35]. In particular, thioredoxin, glutaredoxin and protein disulfide isomerase, belonging to the protein thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase family, represent pivotal enzymes able to catalyze protein disulfide bond reduction. Thioredoxin is involved in pro-proliferative, anti-apoptotic and anti-oxidative mechanisms, and its glutathionylation causes an impairment of its function [36]. Glutaredoxins, also called thioltransferases, possess the activity of thiol-disulfide exchange, thus reducing glutathionyl proteins. Glutaredoxins have been also identified within erythrocytes, in which they promote the formation of hemoglobin starting from HbSSG [37]. Lastly, protein disulfide isomerase contributes to reduction, formation and isomerization of protein disulfide bonds, crucial for the correct structure and fold of several proteins, within mammalian endoplasmic reticulum [38].
In most studies glutathionylation has been found to occur under pathological conditions, including chronic renal failure, DM, and atherosclerosis, but it is also present under normal conditions as physiological responses to oxidative stress. In most cells of healthy subjects glutathione is bound to cytosolic proteins, and approximately half of glutathione binds to proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum. Therefore, several structural and functional proteins could be targeted by S-glutathionylation, which varies by tissue type, resulting generally in an alteration of their functionalities. It has been reported evidence of reduction of catalytic efficiency of several enzymes, including carbonic anhydrase III in hepatocytes, mitochondrial NADP(+)-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase and bovine lens aldose reductase, following S-glutathionylation, along with alterations in protein stability and modifications in the capacity of transcription factors to bind targeted DNA sites [19,39]. Moreover, several studies confirm that glutathione plays an important role in cellular dynamics. Indeed, proteins interacting and binding to glutathione (glutathionylated proteins) have been identified in different cells and tissues in multiple physiological and pathological conditions [39].
Overall, S-glutathionylation is a rapid, specific and reversible reaction, which, in addition to its protective function, has the ability to modulate cellular functions, such as metabolism, energy sensing, cell migration and growth, based on the redox state in which the cell is found [28,40]. Protein S-glutathionylation occurs both under physiological conditions and pathological states in which defense mechanisms are triggered against oxidative stress.

3. S-Glutathionylation of Hemoglobin

Among the different proteins that could be glutathonylated there is hemoglobin. Human hemoglobin is a tetrameric protein, composed of two α globin chains and two β globin chains (α2β2), which plays a key role in oxygen transport in red blood cells throughout the body. Indeed, each globin chain contains a heme able to bind one molecule of oxygen. Several intra- and inter-subunit interactions occur between amino acids residues in hemoglobin and are responsible for the dynamic equilibrium between the oxy state (oxygen-bound form, HbFe2+-O2), and deoxy one (oxygen-free form, HbFe2+) of hemoglobin, and its related functions. One cysteine residue is contained in each α globin chain (αCys104), whereas two cysteine residues can be found in eachβ globin chain (βCys93 and βCys112). Between these three cysteine residues, αCys104 is totally hidden and βCys93 is by far more reachable compared to βCys112. Therefore, βCys93 residue represents the favorite site for the binding of the tripeptide glutathione molecule in order to obtain HbSSG, even if it has been demonstrated also glutathionylation at βCys112 [41,42]. This conjugation occurs in response to oxidative stress and serves as a protective mechanism against oxidative stress conditions. Attachment of glutathione to hemoglobin endows it with antioxidant properties, enabling it to scavenge harmful ROS and thwart oxidative damage to cellular components [43]. In the glutathionylation of hemoglobin (HbSH) to glutathionyl hemoglobin (HbSSG) a first possibility is its direct oxidation by ROS to the formation of the β-93-cysteine thiyl radical (Hb-S•) or the β-93-cysteine sulfenic acid (Hb-SOH) that reacts with GSH leading to HbSSG (Figure 1, mechanisms 1 and 2). Another possibility is when hemoglobin acts as a buffer scavenger of oxidized glutathione in its transient form (glutathione sulfenic acid, GS-OH), yielding the mixed disulfide protein HbSSG (Figure 1, mechanisms 3) or when under severe oxidative stress conditions, a higher ratio of GSSG to GSH is present allowing HbSH (in a deprotonated thiolate anion –S- form) to attack the sulfhydryl of GSSG (Figure 1, mechanisms 4).
The properties of HbSSG have been studied by several in vitro studies. This oxidative modification induces a shift into average molecular mass of β globin chain from 15867 Da of native β globin to 16172 Da of modified β globin [44]. Tertiary structural perturbations of HbSSG, including perturbation of the β-heme pocket, dissociation of the salt bridge between βAsp94 and βHis146 and hydrogen bond among βAsp99 and αTyr42, were identified by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [45]. In addition, quaternary structural modifications of both oxy and deoxy states, such as destabilization of different hydrogen bonds at the αβ interface, have been also investigated using hydrogen/deuterium exchange combined with matrix assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry [46]. As a result of its conformational changes in both tertiary and quaternary structure, HbSSG shows a six-fold increased oxygen affinity compared to normal hemoglobin along with a decreased cooperativity, thus reducing the oxygen delivery to targeted tissues. Enhancement of oxygen affinity of HbSSG could be related to a modification of the heme position and environment, because binding affinity is strictly associated to heme iron. However, despite the increased conformational flexibility of the modified hemoglobin caused by the elimination of several noncovalent interactions at the interface between α and β globin chains, the overall structure of hemoglobin does not significantly change thanks to the positioning of glutathione molecule into a groove of tetrameric conformation [44].

4. Glutathionyl Hemoglobin and Methemoglobin

HbSSG could be also produced starting from the oxidation of hemoglobin to methemoglobin within intact erythrocytes, thus establishing an indirect interconnection between HbSSG and methemoglobin [47]. In particular, methemoglobin is obtained through the reaction between the Fe(II)O2-group of oxyhemoglobin and oxidant molecules, like H2O2, nitrite, nitric oxide and hydroperoxide, which induce the oxidation of hemoglobin iron from the ferrous state (Fe2+) to the ferric one (Fe3+) [48]. In contrast to normal hemoglobin, methemoglobin is unable to transport oxygen because the transport of oxygen needs a reversibly bound between oxygen and ferrous hemoglobin, thus reducing the amount of oxygen delivered to different tissues and enhancing the potential risk of tissue hypoxia [49]. Moreover, production of methemoglobin within healthy erythrocytes promotes erythrocyte disfunctions, like peroxidative changes in their membranes [47]. Under physiological conditions, methemoglobin is produced at 3%/day rate since, although the oxygenated hemoglobin is a stable molecule, it slowly undergoes an auto-oxidization process [49]. However, several protective mechanisms, like the cytochrome b5-methemoglobin reductase pathway, maintain its levels below 1% by reducing the ferric ion (Fe3+) to the ferrous ion (Fe2+). Indeed, cytochrome b5 reductase is able to convert methemoglobin to hemoglobin through the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, thus eliminating 95-99% of methemoglobin [50]. Furthermore, NADPH-methemoglobin reductase, involved in another enzymatic pathway, is able to neutralize methemoglobin, thus removing the remaining 5% of produced methemoglobin. This second pathway could be also pharmacologically activated by other cofactors, including methylene blue [51]. The pathological condition related to high levels of methemoglobin in the blood, induced by drugs or toxins, is called methemoglobinemia and could lead to a fatal tissue hypoxia [48].
Investigating the connection between methemoglobin and HbSSG, it has been reported that incubation of erythrocytes with the cell membrane permeable hydroperoxide tert-Butylhydroperoxide (tBHP) linearly enhances the formation of methemoglobin until 10 minutes of incubation, which in turn reacts with GSSG to form HbSSG. Instead, the sulfhydryl reductant dithiothreitol (DTT) avoids the production of methemoglobin by tBHP, protecting the erythrocytes from peroxidative changes [47]. Therefore, different kinds of hemoglobin glutathionylation can occur within intact erythrocytes, including the formation of mixed disulfide bond among GSH and normal hemoglobin, but also between cysteine residues of methemoglobin and GSSG [52].

5. Methods for the Detection of Glutathionyl Hemoglobin

In order to better highlight both the physiological and pathological role of glutathionylated proteins, including hemoglobin, several studies have been focused on the methodological systems used to quantify them. Analysis of glutathionylated proteins is challenging to perform because their concentrations could be overestimated due to a GSH artefactual oxidation in the pre-analytical step, thus leading to an increase in both GSSG and glutathionylated proteins levels. With the aim of preventing this experimental trouble, Giustarini et al. (2022) have recently developed a specific high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based method. Briefly, after collection, samples have been pre-treated with an alkylating agent, then protein deglutathionylation has been induced by DTT, and the released GSH, previously marked with a fluorescent probe, has been successfully quantified by HPLC. Thiol groups of proteins are thus protected from their artificial oxidation. The main disadvantage of this method is the inability to discriminate between the various glutathionylated proteins, thus not allowing to identify each specific protein subjected to S-glutathionylation, whereas the main advantage is the possibility of accurately estimating the total quantity of glutathionylated proteins in the analyzed sample. Protocol applied by Giustarini et al. (2022) can be considered for all biological samples. However, as far as blood is concerned, it appears to be particularly subject to the autoxidation of GSH, due to the presence of oxygen and iron within the heme group. Therefore, by applying this protocol in the blood, the data loses some significance, unlike the data obtained from other biological samples. Hence, investigation and development of specific techniques have become necessary for a more accurate detection and quantification of glutathionylated proteins within the blood [53]. Starting from this evidence and focusing specifically on HbSSG, it has been reported that its detection is not possible within healthy erythrocytes using traditional analytic techniques like electrophoresis, because of the low concentrations of GSSG in normal cells. Instead, highly specific and sensitive techniques, like liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, are able to detect HbSSG also in normal erythrocytes [54]. In particular, liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry separates HbSSG from other hemoglobin variants and then subjects it to mass spectrometry for precise quantification. However, liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry is not easily accessible because of the high instrumentation costs, shows low tolerance for impurities in sample preparation and is challenging to use for standard measurements [55]. Therefore, alternative methods, including cation-exchange high-pressure liquid chromatography with UV detection and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, have been developed to analyze HbSSG levels overcoming the limitations of currently used techniques. The first one is a reproducible and simple procedure, based on the separation of HbSSG thanks to its chemical properties and then its quantification using UV or fluorescent detection. It is able to detect concentrations of this post-translational modified hemoglobin in blood, avoiding arduous sample preparation, in order to investigate oxidative stress conditions and evaluate the potential effectiveness of antioxidant strategies. Robustness and reproducibility of this method make it suitable for clinical investigations [55]. The second one is mainly used to quantify the levels of hemoglobin species, like glycated hemoglobin and HbSSG, in blood samples, thus obtaining a quantitative analysis of a potential biomarker of oxidative stress in several pathologies. Moreover, it is characterized by high sensitivity and resolution, and allows for low-cost analysis, enabling the evaluation of a large number of samples in a short time [56]. Lastly, hydrogen/deuterium exchange based mass spectrometry represents a potent technique able to explore the solution-phase conformational dynamics, and hence correlate functional aberrations with structural modifications of the HbSSG [46].
In contrast to healthy erythrocytes, oxidative stress that characterizes several pathological conditions promotes an increase in GSSG levels, giving rise to an enhanced concentration of HbSSG in patient blood, which could be more easily detected and quantified using the above-mentioned techniques [57]. Hence, HbSSG is frequently employed to gauge the extent of oxidative stress in several pathological states.

6. Glutathionyl Hemoglobin and Diseases

Elevated levels of HbSSG have been registered in several diseases associated with oxidative stress, including chronic renal failure, DM, HLD, FRDA and IDA, probably due to the severe oxidative stress within erythrocytes of patients affected by these conditions (Table 1). Among the several disorders related to oxidative damage, uremia is a pathological condition that occurs in advanced states of chronic renal failure. Patients affected by this disease may undergo hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) as therapeutic strategy [58]. Uremic patients show a higher ratio of GSSG to GSH, in which GSSG represents a necessary source for the transformation of hemoglobin into HbSSG whereas GSH within red blood cells prevents hemoglobin from being oxidized into methemoglobin. Several studies have taken into consideration patients who have undergone HD, following which there is an increase in HbSSG than normal subjects, probably due to the greater oxidative stress. Indeed, an excess of oxidative stress occurs after HD treatment because of both the poor or defective antioxidant defense and the activation of polymorphonuclear neutrophils through a contact system between blood and dialysis membranes, thus leading to a low concentration of GSH, an increase in GSSG and a lower activity of glutathione-dependent enzymes (glutathione S-transferase (GST), GR, etc.) in the red blood cells [27,59]. Other than HD, uremic patients could be treated with CAPD. Therefore, HbSSG levels have been also analyzed in this pathological condition after the CAPD treatment by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Concentrations of HbSSG significantly increase in CAPD patients, as well as HD patients, compared with healthy subjects. However, no statistically significant differences have been identified in HbSSG levels between HD and CAPD-treated patients [27]. To conclude, the redox balance of intracellular GSH is an important factor as it determines the good functioning of proteins with respect to oxidative stress. In particular, the quantification of HbSSG could be a useful clinical marker of oxidative stress in chronic replacement therapies, such as HD or CAPD [58]. In addition to uremia, diabetes can be further compromised by oxidative stress, a pathogenic factor involved in diabetic complications, thus causing alterations of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids localized on the cell membrane. DM often causes an increase in oxidative stress with the rise of GSSG within red blood cells. In turn, GSSG forms a disulfide bond with the cysteine β93 of hemoglobin, thus leading to the formation of HbSSG. It has been demonstrated that HbSSG levels are higher in patients with DM compared to healthy subjects, and the administration of vitamin E for eight weeks could lead to the reduction of HbSSG concentrations. Therefore, oxidative stress in red blood cells determines the increase in HbSSG also in patients suffering from DM [25,60]. Furthermore, it has been also investigated a minor glutathionyl hemoglobin subfraction, called HbSSG A1d3, comparing diabetic patients and healthy subjects. HbSSG A1d3 formation occurs when the amino terminal valine residue of the hemoglobin β chain is covalently derivatized with an Amadori product via the Maillard reaction. The study highlights the characterization of HbSSG A1d3 as a subfraction of HbSSG, showing higher levels of this modified hemoglobin in DM patients compared to non-diabetic individuals. In conclusion, also HbSSG A1d3 could be employed as a useful marker of oxidative stress in patients suffering from DM [61]. Oxidative stress represents a pathogenic factor not only for diabetic conditions but also for HLD, in which ROS are largely produced and antioxidant defense system is altered, resulting in a reduced activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and weak concentrations of GSH within erythrocytes [62]. Therefore, levels of HbSSG have been investigated in erythrocytes of HLD patients by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. It has been reported increased concentrations of HbSSG in patients affected by this disease compared with healthy controls, probably related to the enhanced oxidative stress conditions that characterized HLD [25]. Moreover, the oxygen affinity of HbSSG, prepared in vitro through the incubation of hemoglobin with GSH, is higher than both control hemoglobin and hemoglobin incubated without GSH because of the perturbation of its β chain tertiary structure, whereas its cooperativity (heme-heme interaction) is reduced [25]. This experimental evidence suggests that HbSSG in HLD could result in a decreased tissue oxygen supply and thus tissue hypoxia. Oxidative stress also plays a crucial role in various neurological diseases, including FRDA, a neurodegenerative disorder related to the deficiency of a mitochondrial protein involved into iron metabolism regulation, called frataxin [63]. Considering that a perturbation of glutathione homeostasis could result to or from oxidative stress condition, total, free and protein-bound glutathione levels have been measured in the blood of patients affected by FRDA by Piemonte et al. (2001), thus investigating glutathione role in the pathophysiology of this neurodegenerative condition. A statistically significant increase of HbSSG has been detected in FRDA patient blood compared to healthy subjects by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, together with a decreased free glutathione concentration (both GSH and GSSG) and comparable total glutathione levels. Hence, reduction of free glutathione levels appears to be related to the corresponding increase of its protein-bound form [26]. Starting from this evidence, further studies are needed to confirm the HbSSG emerging role as a clinical biomarker of chronic oxidative stress in neurodegeneration. In addition to FRDA, neurodegeneration in several disorders, including Down syndrome (DS), may be promoted by an impairment of antioxidant systems. DS, characterized by a trisomy of the 21st chromosome, represents the leading cause of human mental retardation. Children affected by this disease show enhanced lipid peroxidation, DNA oxidative damage, and increased levels of CuZn SOD [64]. Considering the involvement of glutathione and related enzymes in neuronal cell death mechanisms, HbSSG has been investigated in the blood of DS patients. Levels of both total glutathione and free glutathione, together with concentrations of HbSSG, decrease in blood of children affected by DS, compared with controls [65]. Indeed, neurodegeneration, oxidative stress and glutathione appear to be strictly associated, as confirmed by these results. However, it is still unknown whether the reduction of all glutathione parameters could be attributed to a decreased glutathione synthesis or an enhanced consumption. Furthermore, SOD/GPX activity ratio increases, whereas activities of GST and GR do not show any statistically significant variations than healthy subjects [65]. Hence, association of the disequilibrium between SOD and GPX activities and deficiency of glutathione system may be responsible for different pathological features of DS. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to better highlight the role of HbSSG in DS children, given that, in contrast to the majority of other disorders, DS induces a reduction of HbSSG levels. Levels of HbSSG have been also investigated by mass spectrometry in patients affected by IDA, in which a marked oxidative stress condition, induced by the enhanced oxidants and reduced antioxidants, was registered [66]. IDA patients showed a significant increase of HbSSG compared to healthy controls. Moreover, a positive correlation of HbSSG concentrations has been observed with serum transferrin receptor, and a negative one with serum ferritin, suggesting that its levels represent an indirect biomarker of the amount of the total body iron in IDA [67]. Another disease whose pathophysiology is related to oxidative stress is the major depressive disorder (MDD), a common psychiatric condition characterized by the reduction of vitamin C and SOD levels along with the increase of reactive pro-oxidants compared to healthy subjects [68]. Here, levels of HbSSG were quantified by liquid chromatography combined with electrospray ionization in patients affected by MDD and treated or not with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for six weeks. Elevated levels of HbSSG were registered compared to controls, whereas treatment with antidepressant medication does not appear to influence its concentration probably because of the short treatment duration and moderate sample size [69]. Further investigation with larger sample size and longer antidepressant treatment duration will clarify the role of HbSSG in MDD condition.
Finally, together with the disorders mentioned above, protein bound glutathione was investigated in blood samples of cigarette smokers to further confirm the potential of HbSSG as oxidative stress biomarker. Indeed, exposure to cigarette smoke (CS) is the leading cause of chronic oxidative stress, and most of the glutathione bound to proteins in blood is located within red cells in the form of HbSSG [70]. In particular, concentrations of HbSSG are higher in smokers compared to nonsmokers, and directly related to the number of cigarettes smoked per day, blood cotinine and blood thiocyanate [71]. These results are confirmed also by Chen et al. (2014), using multistage mass spectrometry able to quantify the amount of glutathionylation at the peptide level in one drop of blood and thus identifying all three cysteine residues that could be glutathionylated [72].
In summary, in contrast to the ratio between GSSG and GSH, blood levels of glutathione bound to proteins are stable for a long time, even if glutathionylation represents a reversible reaction, demonstrating that protein glutathionylation, and in particular HbSSG, is a suitable low-invasive marker for chronic oxidative stress in the whole body.

7. Conclusions

Starting from the evidence reported within this review, hemoglobin represents one of the most susceptible proteins to undergo the reversible PTM of S-glutathionylation following oxidative stress conditions. Levels of HbSSG show a statistically significant increase in several pathological conditions related to oxidative stress, confirming its emerging role as a clinical biomarker of severe oxidative stress but also as a pivotal pathogenic factor in different diseases. Indeed, in contrast to GSSG levels, which increase during oxidative perturbations too, HbSSG is less susceptible to enzymatic reduction, and therefore more suitable to be used as oxidative stress indicator. Moreover, S-glutathionylation of hemoglobin induces conformational modifications in its structure resulting into a regulation of hemoglobin functions, such as an increased oxygen affinity and reduced cooperativity compared to non-modified hemoglobin, thus suggesting a role in the pathophysiology of oxidative stress-associated disorders. However, additional studies are recommended to better highlight the role of HbSSG in correlation with oxidative damage and to develop increasingly accurate as well as reliable techniques for its quantification in clinical investigations.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Birben, E.; Sahiner, U.M.; Sackesen, C.; Erzurum, S.; Kalayci, O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ J 2012, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Cucinotta, M.; Pallio, G.; Mannino, F.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bitto, A. Oxidative Stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017, 2017, 8416763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hayes, J.D.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Tew, K.D. Oxidative Stress in Cancer. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 167–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jelic, M.D.; Mandic, A.D.; Maricic, S.M.; Srdjenovic, B.U. Oxidative stress and its role in cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2021, 17, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Newsholme, P.; Cruzat, V.F.; Keane, K.N.; Carlessi, R.; de Bittencourt, P.I., Jr. Molecular mechanisms of ROS production and oxidative stress in diabetes. Biochem J 2016, 473, 4527–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Phull, A.R.; Nasir, B.; Haq, I.U.; Kim, S.J. Oxidative stress, consequences and ROS mediated cellular signaling in rheumatoid arthritis. Chem Biol Interact 2018, 281, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kattoor, A.J.; Pothineni, N.V.K.; Palagiri, D.; Mehta, J.L. Oxidative Stress in Atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2017, 19, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chistiakov, D.A.; Shkurat, T.P.; Melnichenko, A.A.; Grechko, A.V.; Orekhov, A.N. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease: a brief review. Ann Med 2018, 50, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Islam, M.T. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction-linked neurodegenerative disorders. Neurol Res 2017, 39, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: A Key Modulator in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2019, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Engin, A. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017, 960, 443–467. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ornatowski, W.; Lu, Q.; Yegambaram, M.; Garcia, A.E.; Zemskov, E.A.; Maltepe, E.; Fineman, J.R.; Wang, T.; Black, S.M. Complex interplay between autophagy and oxidative stress in the development of pulmonary disease. Redox Biol 2020, 36, 101679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ratliff, B.B.; Abdulmahdi, W.; Pawar, R.; Wolin, M.S. Oxidant Mechanisms in Renal Injury and Disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 2016, 25, 119–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cha, S.J.; Kim, H.; Choi, H.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, K. Protein Glutathionylation in the Pathogenesis of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017, 2017, 2818565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Valenzuela, P.L.; Carrera-Bastos, P.; Galvez, B.G.; Ruiz-Hurtado, G.; Ordovas, J.M.; Ruilope, L.M.; Lucia, A. Lifestyle interventions for the prevention and treatment of hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021, 18, 251–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wronka, M.; Krzeminska, J.; Mlynarska, E.; Rysz, J.; Franczyk, B. The Influence of Lifestyle and Treatment on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Diabetes. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lechner, K.; von Schacky, C.; McKenzie, A.L.; Worm, N.; Nixdorff, U.; Lechner, B.; Krankel, N.; Halle, M.; Krauss, R.M.; Scherr, J. Lifestyle factors and high-risk atherosclerosis: Pathways and mechanisms beyond traditional risk factors. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020, 27, 394–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Venetsanopoulou, A.I.; Alamanos, Y.; Voulgari, P.V.; Drosos, A.A. Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis: genetic and environmental influences. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022, 18, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niwa, T. Protein glutathionylation and oxidative stress. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007, 855, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smith, F.M.; Kosman, D.J. Molecular Defects in Friedreich’s Ataxia: Convergence of Oxidative Stress and Cytoskeletal Abnormalities. Front Mol Biosci 2020, 7, 569293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Newman, S.F.; Sultana, R.; Perluigi, M.; Coccia, R.; Cai, J.; Pierce, W.M.; Klein, J.B.; Turner, D.M.; Butterfield, D.A. An increase in S-glutathionylated proteins in the Alzheimer’s disease inferior parietal lobule, a proteomics approach. J Neurosci Res 2007, 85, 1506–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Halloran, M.; Parakh, S.; Atkin, J.D. The role of s-nitrosylation and s-glutathionylation of protein disulphide isomerase in protein misfolding and neurodegeneration. Int J Cell Biol 2013, 2013, 797914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sabens Liedhegner, E.A.; Gao, X.H.; Mieyal, J.J. Mechanisms of altered redox regulation in neurodegenerative diseases--focus on S--glutathionylation. Antioxid Redox Signal 2012, 16, 543–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuypers, F.A. Red cell membrane damage. J Heart Valve Dis 1998, 7, 387–395. [Google Scholar]
  25. Niwa, T.; Naito, C.; Mawjood, A.H.; Imai, K. Increased glutathionyl hemoglobin in diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia demonstrated by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2000, 46, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piemonte, F.; Pastore, A.; Tozzi, G.; Tagliacozzi, D.; Santorelli, F.M.; Carrozzo, R.; Casali, C.; Damiano, M.; Federici, G.; Bertini, E. Glutathione in blood of patients with Friedreich’s ataxia. Eur J Clin Invest 2001, 31, 1007–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Takayama, F.; Tsutsui, S.; Horie, M.; Shimokata, K.; Niwa, T. Glutathionyl hemoglobin in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Suppl 2001, 78, S155–S158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mailloux, R.J.; Gill, R.; Young, A. Chapter 13 - Protein S-glutathionylation and the regulation of cellular functions. Oxidative Stress, Academic Press 2020, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818606-0.00013-4, 217-247.
  29. Shelton, M.D.; Chock, P.B.; Mieyal, J.J. Glutaredoxin: role in reversible protein s-glutathionylation and regulation of redox signal transduction and protein translocation. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005, 7, 348–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dalle-Donne, I.; Rossi, R.; Colombo, G.; Giustarini, D.; Milzani, A. Protein S-glutathionylation: a regulatory device from bacteria to humans. Trends Biochem Sci 2009, 34, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Musaogullari, A.; Chai, Y.C. Redox Regulation by Protein S-Glutathionylation: From Molecular Mechanisms to Implications in Health and Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Giustarini, D.; Milzani, A.; Aldini, G.; Carini, M.; Rossi, R.; Dalle-Donne, I. S-nitrosation versus S-glutathionylation of protein sulfhydryl groups by S-nitrosoglutathione. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005, 7, 930–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Giustarini, D.; Rossi, R.; Milzani, A.; Colombo, R.; Dalle-Donne, I. S-glutathionylation: from redox regulation of protein functions to human diseases. J Cell Mol Med 2004, 8, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mieyal, J.J.; Gallogly, M.M.; Qanungo, S.; Sabens, E.A.; Shelton, M.D. Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of reversible protein S-glutathionylation. Antioxid Redox Signal 2008, 10, 1941–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nagy, P. Kinetics and mechanisms of thiol-disulfide exchange covering direct substitution and thiol oxidation-mediated pathways. Antioxid Redox Signal 2013, 18, 1623–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Haendeler, J. Thioredoxin-1 and posttranslational modifications. Antioxid Redox Signal 2006, 8, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Starke, D.W.; Chock, P.B.; Mieyal, J.J. Glutathione-thiyl radical scavenging and transferase properties of human glutaredoxin (thioltransferase). Potential role in redox signal transduction. J Biol Chem 2003, 278, 14607–14613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jessop, C.E.; Chakravarthi, S.; Watkins, R.H.; Bulleid, N.J. Oxidative protein folding in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem Soc Trans 2004, 32, 655–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hill, B.G.; Bhatnagar, A. Protein S-glutathiolation: redox-sensitive regulation of protein function. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2012, 52, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mailloux, R.J.; Willmore, W.G. S-glutathionylation reactions in mitochondrial function and disease. Front Cell Dev Biol 2014, 2, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mitra, A.; Muralidharan, M.; Srivastava, D.; Das, R.; Bhat, V.; Mandal, A.K. Assessment of Cysteine Reactivity of Human Hemoglobin at Its Residue Level: A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach. Hemoglobin 2017, 41, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mitra, G.; Muralidharan, M.; Pinto, J.; Srinivasan, K.; Mandal, A.K. Structural perturbation of human hemoglobin on glutathionylation probed by hydrogen-deuterium exchange and MALDI mass spectrometry. Bioconjug Chem 2011, 22, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rubino, F.M. The Redox Potential of the beta-(93)-Cysteine Thiol Group in Human Hemoglobin Estimated from In Vitro Oxidant Challenge Experiments. Molecules 2021, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Muralidharan, M.; Mitra, A.; Maity, D.; Pal, D.; Mandal, A.K. Structural analysis of glutathionyl hemoglobin using native mass spectrometry. J Struct Biol 2019, 208, 107386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Craescu, C.T.; Poyart, C.; Schaeffer, C.; Garel, M.C.; Kister, J.; Beuzard, Y. Covalent binding of glutathione to hemoglobin. II. Functional consequences and structural changes reflected in NMR spectra. J Biol Chem 1986, 261, 14710–14716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mitra, G.; Muralidharan, M.; Narayanan, S.; Pinto, J.; Srinivasan, K.; Mandal, A.K. Glutathionylation induced structural changes in oxy human hemoglobin analyzed by backbone amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange and MALDI-mass spectrometry. Bioconjug Chem 2012, 23, 2344–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Murakami, K.; Mawatari, S. Oxidation of hemoglobin to methemoglobin in intact erythrocyte by a hydroperoxide induces formation of glutathionyl hemoglobin and binding of alpha-hemoglobin to membrane. Arch Biochem Biophys 2003, 417, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Skold, A.; Cosco, D.L.; Klein, R. Methemoglobinemia: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. South Med J 2011, 104, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mansouri, A.; Lurie, A.A. Concise review: methemoglobinemia. Am J Hematol 1993, 42, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wright, R.O.; Lewander, W.J.; Woolf, A.D. Methemoglobinemia: etiology, pharmacology, and clinical management. Ann Emerg Med 1999, 34, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Curry, S. Methemoglobinemia. Ann Emerg Med 1982, 11, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mawatari, S.; Murakami, K. Different types of glutathionylation of hemoglobin can exist in intact erythrocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys 2004, 421, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Giustarini, D.; Milzani, A.; Dalle-Donne, I.; Rossi, R. Measurement of S-glutathionylated proteins by HPLC. Amino Acids 2022, 54, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Garel, M.C.; Beuzard, Y.; Thillet, J.; Domenget, C.; Martin, J.; Galacteros, F.; Rosa, J. Binding of 21 thiol reagents to human hemoglobin in solution and in intact cells. Eur J Biochem 1982, 123, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pastore, A.; Mozzi, A.F.; Tozzi, G.; Gaeta, L.M.; Federici, G.; Bertini, E.; Lo Russo, A.; Mannucci, L.; Piemonte, F. Determination of glutathionyl-hemoglobin in human erythrocytes by cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem 2003, 312, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Biroccio, A.; Urbani, A.; Massoud, R.; di Ilio, C.; Sacchetta, P.; Bernardini, S.; Cortese, C.; Federici, G. A quantitative method for the analysis of glycated and glutathionylated hemoglobin by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 2005, 336, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bursell, S.E.; King, G.L. The potential use of glutathionyl hemoglobin as a clinical marker of oxidative stress. Clin Chem 2000, 46, 145–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mandal, A.K.; Woodi, M.; Sood, V.; Krishnaswamy, P.R.; Rao, A.; Ballal, S.; Balaram, P. Quantitation and characterization of glutathionyl haemoglobin as an oxidative stress marker in chronic renal failure by mass spectrometry. Clin Biochem 2007, 40, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Naito, C.; Kajita, M.; Niwa, T. Determination of glutathionyl hemoglobin in hemodialysis patients using electrospray ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1999, 731, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Naito, C.; Niwa, T. Analysis of glutathionyl hemoglobin levels in diabetic patients by electrospray ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: effect of vitamin E administration. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000, 746, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Al-Abed, Y.; VanPatten, S.; Li, H.; Lawson, J.A.; FitzGerald, G.A.; Manogue, K.R.; Bucala, R. Characterization of a novel hemoglobin-glutathione adduct that is elevated in diabetic patients. Mol Med 2001, 7, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tesfamariam, B. Free radicals in diabetic endothelial cell dysfunction. Free Radic Biol Med 1994, 16, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pandolfo, M. Molecular pathogenesis of Friedreich ataxia. Arch Neurol 1999, 56, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jovanovic, S.V.; Clements, D.; MacLeod, K. Biomarkers of oxidative stress are significantly elevated in Down syndrome. Free Radic Biol Med 1998, 25, 1044–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pastore, A.; Tozzi, G.; Gaeta, L.M.; Giannotti, A.; Bertini, E.; Federici, G.; Digilio, M.C.; Piemonte, F. Glutathione metabolism and antioxidant enzymes in children with Down syndrome. J Pediatr 2003, 142, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yoo, J.H.; Maeng, H.Y.; Sun, Y.K.; Kim, Y.A.; Park, D.W.; Park, T.S.; Lee, S.T.; Choi, J.R. Oxidative status in iron-deficiency anemia. J Clin Lab Anal 2009, 23, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shet, A.S.; Pinto, S.M.; Mitra, G.; Mandal, A.K. Glutathionyl hemoglobin is elevated in iron deficiency anemia. Acta Haematol 2012, 127, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gautam, M.; Agrawal, M.; Gautam, M.; Sharma, P.; Gautam, A.S.; Gautam, S. Role of antioxidants in generalised anxiety disorder and depression. Indian J Psychiatry 2012, 54, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mathew, B.; Srinivasan, K.; Johnson, P.; Thomas, T.; Mandal, A.K. Elevated levels of glutathionyl haemoglobin as an oxidative stress marker in patients with major depressive disorder. Indian J Med Res 2019, 149, 497–502. [Google Scholar]
  70. Pryor, W.A. Cigarette smoke radicals and the role of free radicals in chemical carcinogenicity. Environ Health Perspect 1997, 105 Suppl 4, 875–882. [Google Scholar]
  71. Muscat, J.E.; Kleinman, W.; Colosimo, S.; Muir, A.; Lazarus, P.; Park, J.; Richie, J.P., Jr. Enhanced protein glutathiolation and oxidative stress in cigarette smokers. Free Radic Biol Med 2004, 36, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, H.J.; Lin, W.P.; Chiu, S.D.; Fan, C.H. Multistage mass spectrometric analysis of human hemoglobin glutathionylation: correlation with cigarette smoking. Chem Res Toxicol 2014, 27, 864–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 88321 g001
Figure 1. Response of erythrocytes to transient and chronic conditions of oxidative stress via glutathionyl hemoglobin (HbSSG) formation. In mechanism 1 and 2 ROS catalyze the formation of Hb β-93-cysteine thiyl radical or sulfenic acid, respectively. These intermediates react with GSH to generate HbSSG. In mechanism 3, ROS oxidize GSH to the sulfenic acid form, which reacts with Hb β-93-cysteine to generate HbSSG. In mechanism 4, ROS increase GSSG concentration that can be attacked by Hb β-93-cysteine in its thiolate anion form. O2 dotted arrow represents the reduced oxygen delivery of HbSSG to targeted tissues.
Figure 1. Response of erythrocytes to transient and chronic conditions of oxidative stress via glutathionyl hemoglobin (HbSSG) formation. In mechanism 1 and 2 ROS catalyze the formation of Hb β-93-cysteine thiyl radical or sulfenic acid, respectively. These intermediates react with GSH to generate HbSSG. In mechanism 3, ROS oxidize GSH to the sulfenic acid form, which reacts with Hb β-93-cysteine to generate HbSSG. In mechanism 4, ROS increase GSSG concentration that can be attacked by Hb β-93-cysteine in its thiolate anion form. O2 dotted arrow represents the reduced oxygen delivery of HbSSG to targeted tissues.
Preprints 88321 g001
Table 1. Selected clinical studies that measured the levels of glutathionyl hemoglobin (HbSSG) in different diseases compared to healthy subjects.
Table 1. Selected clinical studies that measured the levels of glutathionyl hemoglobin (HbSSG) in different diseases compared to healthy subjects.
Disease/treatment Values Reference
HD HbSSG β (%)
Normal n=20 3.7±0.3
HD n=10 18.6±0.9a Naito et al. (1999) [59]
HD n=10 20.8±0.9b
Normal n=20 3.0±1.6
HD n=30 8.0±3.6 Takayama et al. (2001) [27]
HD n=12 8.7±3.2 a
HD n=12 8.7±2.8 b
CAPD HbSSG β (%)
Normal n=20 3.0±1.6
CAPD n=10 5.9±2.7 Takayama et al. (2001) [27]
DM HbSSG β (%)
Normal n=20 3.7±0.3
DM n=10 10.2±0.8c Naito et al. (2000) [60]
DM n=10 4.1±0.4d
Normal n=20 3.7±0.3
DM n=37 7.9±0.5 Niwa et al. (2000) [25]
HbSSG A1d3 (%)
Normal n=9 1.2±0.1
DM n=20 2.3±0.3 Al-Abed et al. (2001) [61]
HLD HbSSG β (%)
Normal n=20 3.7±0.3
HLD n=17 8.1±0.8 Niwa et al. (2000) [25]
FRDA HbSSG β (%)
Normal n=20 8.0±1.8
FRDA n=14 15.0±1.5 Piemonte et al. (2001) [26]
DS
Normal n=64
DS n=46
 HbSSG β (%)
2.65±1.1
1.47±0.6
Pastore et al. (2003) [63]
IDA
Normal n=15
IDA n=23
 HbSSG β (%)
7.7±3.7
16.9±9.6
Shet et al. (2012) [65]
MDD
Normal n=17
MDD n=26

MDD n=11
MDD n=11
 HbSSG β (%)
5.73
8.34

8.07e
7.68f



Mathew et al. (2019) [67]
CS
Nonsmokers n=354
Smokers n=97
 HbSSG β (%)g
5.6
8.1
Muscat et al. (2004) [71]

Nonsmokers n=20
Smokers n=20
 HbSSG α (%)h
2.24±0.91
3.61±1.41
Chen et al. (2014) [70]

Nonsmokers n=20
Smokers n=20
 HbSSG β(%)i
3.79±1.42
6.69±2.33
Chen et al. (2014) [70]

Nonsmokers n=20
Smokers n=20
 HbSSG β (%)l
0.54±0.68
0.56±0.39
Chen et al. (2014) [70]
HD: hemodialysis, abefore hemodialysis, bafter hemodialysis; CAPD: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; DM: diabetes mellitus, cbefore vitamin E, dafter vitamin E; HLD: hyperlipidemia; FRDA: Friedreich’s ataxia; DS: Down syndrome; IDA: iron deficiency anemia; MDD: major depressive disorder, epre-antidepressant treatment, fpost-antidepressant treatment; CS: cigarette smoker, gestimated value, hglutathionyl hemoglobin at α−Cys-104, iglutathionyl hemoglobin at β−Cys-93, lglutathionyl hemoglobin at β−Cys-112.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated