1. Introduction
Valence tautomerism (VT) is characterized by the coexistence of two (or more) redox isomers which differ in their charge and spin density distribution and hence the oxidation state assignment to the individual redox sites. VT may occur if a molecule contains two chemically different redox-active entities, which are oxidized, resp. reduced, at similar redox potentials [
1]. Interconversion between individual valence tautomers occurs via an intramolecular electron transfer and can be induced by external triggers, e.g. irradiation with light [
2,
3,
4,
5] or X-ray [
6,
7], or variation of temperature [
8,
9,
10,
11,
12]. This renders them stimuli-responsive.
Several examples of metal complexes exhibiting VT are known to literature [
1,
13,
14,
15]. An early example of valence tautomerism occurring in sandwich complexes was provided by the group of Veciana in 2003 [
12], when they presented a dyad comprising of a ferrocenyl building block and a perchlorotriphenylmethyl (PTM) radical as redox-active units, bridged by a vinylene linker. Thermally induced intramolecular electron transfer from the ferrocenyl unit to the PTM radical results in the zwitterionic ferrocenium-trityl complex shown at the top of
Scheme 1. The valence tautomeric equilibrium was analyzed via
T-dependent
57Fe-Mößbauer spectroscopy, showing both, Fe(II) and Fe(III) signals.
Trityl-type compounds CAr
3n+ can not only exist as radicals CAr
3• (n = 0) or anions CAr
3− (n = -1), but also as the tritylium cations CAr
3+ (n = +1) [
17,
18,
19,
20]. Attaching a suitable tritylium unit CAr
3+ to ferrocene can therefore result in VT between a diamagnetic ferrocene-tritylium form and a paramagnetic ferrocenium-trityl diradical isomer (
Scheme 1, bottom). This would render such complexes magnetochemical switches. While we have recently shown that VT can be purposefully implemented in ferrocene-tritylium complexes via tailoring the reduction potential of the tritylium unit [
16,
21], there are some inherent disadvantages of such dyads: (i) Altering the oxidation potential of the ferrocene unit (e.g. via methylation of the cyclopentadienide ligands) turned out to be synthetically challenging. (ii) Due to very fast electron spin relaxation, ferrocenium ions show extremely broad and low-intensity EPR signals, which are only observable at very low temperatures, usually at 10 K or below [
22,
23]. This made it very difficult for us to observe the EPR signatures of both types of radicals at the same time, since the diradical ferrocenium isomer is thermodynamically less stable [
16]. We therefore sought for better alternatives for the ferrocenyl donor, which combines the treats of a facile adjustment of its oxidation potential and a more straightforward means to detect the actual oxidation state of the metal ion with the aid of molecular spectroscopy.
Examples of such candidates are chromium half-sandwich complexes [(
η6-arene)Cr(CO)
2L]. The simplest representative, [(
η6-C
6H
6)Cr(CO)
3], was first published by Fischer and Öfele in 1957 [
24]. This was soon followed by a vast variety of other chromium half-sandwich complexes [
25,
26,
27,
28] and the development of more convenient synthetic approaches [
29,
30]. The herein proposed electron-rich [(
η6-arene)Cr(CO)
2L] complexes to be used as donors in such dyads have some advantages over the previously employed ferrocene. First, the oxidation potential of the chromium unit can be easily adjusted by substituting one CO ligand for a better σ-donor / weaker π-acceptor L [
31]. This is demonstrated by the shift of the half-wave potential for chromium oxidation by -660 mV on substitution of one CO ligand in [(
η6-C
6H
6)Cr(CO)
3] for triphenylphosphine, PPh
3 [
32]. Secondly, CO ligands are excellent charge-sensitive labels for infrared (IR) spectroscopy. As the energies of the CO stretching vibrations of the Cr(0) and Cr(I) redox states differ by 100-150 cm
-1 [
31,
32,
33] and the CO band intensities vary only little with the chromium oxidation state [
34], IR spectroscopy provides an easy handle for probing the valence tautomeric equilibrium. Thirdly, the chromium-centered radical is already EPR-active at 77 K [
32,
33,
35], which is much more convenient as compared to the need for 10 K measurements for ferrocenium species.
The main aim of this work is the purposeful implementation of VT into [(
η6-arene)Cr(CO)
2L]-triarylmethylium dyads via tuning the oxidation potential of the metal unit. The valence tautomeric equilibrium of the envisioned chromium half-sandwich complexes is designed to occur between a diamagnetic Cr(0)-C
6H
4-CAr
2+ species and a paramagnetic Cr(I)
+•-C
6H
4-CAr
2• species (cf.
Scheme 2).
4. Summary and Conclusions
We have reported on three new chromium half-sandwich triarylmethylium dyads [Cr(CO)2L(η6-C6H4(2-OMe)-C6H4-C+{-C6H4(4-CF3)}2] (1+ - 3+) with different coligands L (L = CO, P(OPh)3, PPh3) at the chromium atom. Cyclic voltammetry data of their carbinol precursors 1-OH - 3-OH indicate that variation in L shifts the chromium oxidation potential over a range > 600 mV. These compounds, symbolized as Cr(0)-C6H4-CAr2+, were investigated with respect to their propensity to coexist with their paramagnetic redox isomers (valence tautomers) Cr(I)+•-C6H4-CAr2•. The latter result from intramolecular electron transfer from the Cr(0) donor to the tritylium-type acceptor unit.
The potential difference of 575 mV between chromium-based oxidation and tritylium-based reduction in 1+, which corresponds to ΔG = 55.5 kJ mol-1, is too large to allow for significant quantities of the diradical valence tautomer. For complex 3+ however, the oxidation and reduction waves overlap, indicating that the two isomers are nearly degenerate. Indeed, the IR spectrum of in situ generated 3+ shows two pairs of carbonyl bands, separated by 117 cm-1, which is supportive of the simultaneous presence of a Cr(0)-C6H4-CAr2+ and a Cr(I)+•-C6H4-CAr2• isomer. As was shown by IR spectroscopy, the equilibrium between the two valence tautomers is T-dependent with higher proportions of the thermodynamically less stable, but entropically favored diradical isomer present at higher T. The spectral changes are reversible as long as T is kept below -40 °C, where decomposition sets in. Quantitative EPR spectroscopy suggests that, at -70 °C, ca. two out of three molecules of the paramagnetic isomer are trapped in a dimer 3+•-3+•. In frozen solution, the typical EPR signature of the half-sandwich Cr(I) entity was observed together with the isotropic signal of the trityl-type radical, confirming the simultaneous presence of both types of paramagnetic centers.
While the near degeneracy of the diamagnetic and diradical isomer in 3+ constitutes an ideal situation for magnetoswitching, i.e. the thermoresponsive and reversible alteration of magnetic properties, its low thermal stability poses a serious obstacle to practical applications. 3+ and its congeners 1+ and 2+ decompose even at low temperatures and under inert gas conditions. We were able to identify the triarylmethane-appended complex 1-H and the respective free ligand L-H as the main products generated during this process. This hints at the decisive role of the diradical valence tautomers 1+•• - 3+•• from which 1-H is putatively formed by H atom abstraction and subsequent decoordination of the ligand L-H. This concurs with the observation that 1+, which generates the smallest quantities of the paramagnetic isomer, is the most stable complex of the three. Since 1-H and L-H were also identified as arising from decomposition of complexes 2+ and 3+, their decomposition must ensue with exchange of CO and PR3 ligands.
Our results nevertheless show that valence tautomerism can be purposefully implemented into chromium half-sandwich triarylmethylium complexes by tailoring the oxidation potential of the metal unit via ligand substitution. The presence of CO ligands at the metal ion and the detectability of the EPR signal of the paramagnetic metal entity under well-accessible conditions provide highly convenient handles for an in-depth analysis of such systems. In particular, they alleviate studies of the valence tautomeric equilibria when compared to related ferrocenyl systems. Further improvements might be achieved by steric shielding of the trityl unit in order to thwart dimerization and taming the reactive trityl site through enhanced spin density delocalization. This will be the subject of further forays in our laboratories.
5. Materials and Methods
Experimental Methods and Materials. All syntheses were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk and Glovebox techniques. Solvents were taken from a solvent purification system (SPS). All reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. [NBu
4]
+ [B{C
6H
3(CF
3)
2-3,5}
4]
− [
64,
65], Brookhart’s acid [
39] and complex
1′ [
36] were prepared according to published procedures. Ligand substitution was conducted photochemically by UV irradiation using a high-pressure mercury lamp and a Duran glass irradiation apparatus [
38,
66].
NMR Spectroscopy. 1H-NMR (400/600/800 MHz),
19F{
1H}-NMR (376/752 MHz),
31P{
1H}-NMR (162 MHz) and
13C{
1H}-NMR (101/151/202 MHz) spectra were recorded in CD
2Cl
2 at 300 K on a Bruker Avance III 400, Bruker Avance III 600 or Bruker Avance Neo 800 spectrometer. NMR spectra were referenced to residual solvent signals (
1H) resp. the solvent signal itself (
13C).
19F- and
31P-NMR spectra were referenced to the external reference of the spectrometer (δ(
19F/
31P) = 0 ppm for CFCl
3, or H
3PO
4, respectively). Assignment of the signals is based on 2D spectra.
Mass Spectrometry. Mass spectra were recorded in the positive mode on an ESI-calibrated LTQ Orbitrap Velos Spectrometer with direct injection of dichloromethane solutions.
IR Spectroscopy. Room temperature IR spectra were recorded in dichloromethane on a Bruker Tensor II FT-IR spectrometer. Low-temperature IR spectra of the tritylium complexes were recorded inside a nitrogen filled glovebox on a Nicolet iS10 spectrometer with the aid of a Remspec fiber-optic transmission IR probe. The custom-build setup was already described in an earlier publication [
16]. It is composed of two cups with 5 mL capacity each, made of thermally conducting Al
2O
3 (one for the reference, one for the sample), which can be switched automatically. Cooling was done with a cryostat (-40 °C) with thermal connection to a cascading Peltier cooler inside the glovebox, which allows for cooling to -75 °C (the temperature is measured directly at the Al vials). The IR spectra were baseline-corrected.
Thermodynamic Analysis. The pairs of carbonyl bands in
T-dependent IR spectra of
3+ were integrated separately for both valence tautomers. Assuming that the band intensities are invariant to the chromium oxidation state allowed us to calculate the equilibrium constant
K from the ratio of the peak areas for the paramagnetic and the diamagnetic valence tautomers. This was done for every temperature in the range of -70 to -40 °C. Next, the corresponding Δ
G values were calculated according to the equation Δ
G = -R
T⋅ln(
K) for every data point. The resulting plot of Δ
G against
T is depicted in
Figure S24 in the
Supplementary Materials. Δ
H was taken from the intercept, and Δ
S from the slope.
X-Ray Crystallography. A STOE IPDS-II image plate diffractometer equipped with a Mo-Kα or Cu-Kα radiation source was used. Data acquisition was conducted at 100 K. The program package X-Area was used for data processing. Depending on the structure, either semiempirical or spherical absorption corrections were performed. The structure was solved and refined with SHELXT [
67,
68] and OLEX2 [
69]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically.
EPR Spectroscopy. EPR samples of the cationic complexes were freshly prepared inside a nitrogen-filled glovebox, using glassware and dichloromethane that were precooled to -40 °C. Prior to filling, the EPR tube was inserted into suitable boring in an Al block that was precooled to -40°C to serve as cold reservoir in order to prevent decomposition.
T-dependent EPR spectra were recorded in dichloromethane on a X-band benchtop spectrometer MiniScope MS5000. Quantitative EPR measurements of the complexes and the dpph
• standard were recorded with defined measurement parameters (
B = 330-345 mT, modulation = 0.3 mT, power = 6.3096 mW, sweep time 60 s) to ensure comparability [
42]. EPR spectra in frozen solution were conducted at 77 K on a X-band ELEXSYS E580 spectrometer. Simulation of the EPR spectra was performed with the
Matlab software package EasySpin using the ‘garlic’ resp. ‘pepper’ functions [
58].
Cyclic Voltammetry. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were conducted under argon atmosphere at room temperature (
1-OH -
3-OH,
1+,
2+) or at -78 °C (
3+). The cyclic voltammograms were recorded in dry dichloromethane using the very weakly nucleophilic electrolyte [NBu
4]
+ [B{C
6H
3(CF
3)
2-3,5}
4]
−. A platinum counter electrode, an Ag/AgCl (pseudo)reference electrode, and a glassy carbon working electrode were used. The working electrode was polished with first 1 μm and then 0.25 μm diamond pastes prior to every measurement. Data acquisition was conducted with a computer-controlled
BASi potentiostat. After completion of the measurements, ferrocene resp. decamethylferrocene was added as an internal reference and the measurements were repeated in the presence of the standard. The cyclic voltammograms were then referenced to the Cp
2Fe
0/+ redox couple with Cp*
2Fe
0/+ = -540 mV.
Synthesis of 1-OH. To a solution of 4-bromo-1-trifluoromethylbenzene (0.23 mL, 1.65 mmol) in 20 mL THF was slowly added
n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexane, 0.73 mL, 1.82 mmol) at -78 °C. The solution was stirred for 2 h at -78 °C and [(biaryl ester)Cr(CO)
3]
1′ (250 mg, 0.66 mmol) dissolved in 10 mL THF was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature overnight and subsequently quenched by addition of water (10 mL). The phases were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with diethylether (3 x 20 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with water (20 mL) and brine (20 mL), dried over Na
2SO
4, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (silica gel,
n-pentane/ethyl acetate 3:1 - 2:1) to give yellow
1-OH in 76% yield (321 mg, 0.50 mmol). For atom numbering, see
Figure S1 of the
Supplementary Materials.
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 7.64 (d,
3JHH = 8.4 Hz, 4H,
H-15), 7.54 (d,
3JHH = 8.7 Hz, 2H,
H-9), 7.51 (d,
3JHH = 8.4 Hz, 4H,
H-14), 7.26 (d,
3JHH = 8.7 Hz, 2H,
H-10), 5.82 (dd,
3JHH = 6.3 Hz,
4JHH = 1.4 Hz, 1H,
H-6), 5.69 (ddd,
3JHH = 6.8, 6.3 Hz,
4JHH = 1.4 Hz, 1H,
H-4), 5.20 (dd,
3JHH = 6.8 Hz,
4JHH = 0.8 Hz, 1H,
H-3), 5.03 (vt,
3JHH = 6.3 Hz,
4JHH = 0.8 Hz, 1H,
H-5), 3.75 (s, 3H,
H-1), 3.01 (s, 1H, O
H).
19F{1H}-NMR (376 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = -62.8 (s, C
F3).
13C{1H}-NMR (101 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 233.6 (
CO), 150.3 (
C-13), 146.0 (
C-11), 142.3 (
C-2), 134.7 (
C-8), 130.7 (
C-9), 130.0 (q,
2JCF = 33 Hz,
C-16), 128.6 (
C-14), 127.9 (
C-10), 125.6 (q,
3JCF = 4 Hz,
C-15), 124.6 (q,
1JCF = 272 Hz,
C-17), 101.1 (
C-7), 99.2 (
C-6), 95.6 (
C-4), 85.4 (
C-5), 81.7 (
C-12), 74.3 (
C-3), 56.3 (
C-1).
IR (CH
2Cl
2)
[cm
-1] = 1965, 1886.
ESI-MS calculated for C
31H
20CrF
6O
5+:
m/z = 485.1335 (M
+ -CrCO
3 -OH), 621.0587 (M
+ -OH), 638.0615 (M
+), found: 485.1345, 621.0592, 638.0591 (measured in CH
2Cl
2, direct injection, calibrated).
Ligand Substitution (2-OH). Complex
1-OH (50 mg, 0.08 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (30 mL) and irradiated under IR monitoring. Subsequently, triphenylphosphite (24 mg, 0.08 mmol), dissolved in 5 mL tetrahydrofuran, was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min. The solution was evaporated to dryness and the mixture was separated via column chromatography (silica gel,
n-pentane/diethylether 2:1) giving
2-OH as light orange solid in 18% yield (13 mg, 14 μmol). For atom numbering, see
Figure S5 of the
Supplementary Materials.
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 7.62 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 4H,
H-15), 7.50 (m, 6
H,
H-9+
H-14), 7.40-7.30 (m, 14H,
H-19+
H-20), 7.21-7.14 (m, 5H,
H-10+
H-21), 5.40 (d,
3JHH = 6.1 Hz, 1H,
H-6), 5.23 (dt,
3JHH = 6.7, 6.1 Hz, 1H,
H-4), 3.87 (d,
3JHH = 6.7 Hz, 1H,
H-3), 3.52 (vt,
3JHH = 6.1 Hz, 1H,
H-5), 3.25 (s, 3H,
H-1), 3.03 (s, 1H, O
H).
13C{1H}-NMR (101 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 236.5 (d,
2JCP = 34 Hz,
CO-a), 236.3 (d,
2JCP = 31 Hz,
CO-b), 152.8 (d,
2JCP = 6 Hz,
C-18), 150.3 (
C-13), 145.4 (
C-11), 140.6 (
C-2), 135.8 (
C-8), 130.7 (
C-9), 130.0 (
C-20), 129.9 (q,
2JCF = 32 Hz,
C-16), 128.6 (
C-14), 127.7 (
C-10), 125.5 (q,
3JCF = 4 Hz,
C-15), 124.7 (
C-21), 124.6 (q,
1JCF = 272 Hz,
C-17), 122.2 (d,
3JCP = 4 Hz,
C-19), 96.9 (
C-6), 96.1 (
C-7), 92.6 (
C-4), 82.7 (
C-5), 81.7 (
C-12), 71.4 (
C-3), 55.6 (
C-1).
19F{1H}-NMR (376 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = -62.9 (s, C
F3).
31P{1H}-NMR (162 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 202.1 (s,
P(OPh)
3).
IR (CH
2Cl
2)
[cm
-1] = 1910, 1853.
ESI-MS calculated for C
48H
35CrF
6O
7P
+:
m/
z = 920.1424 (M
+), found: 920.1385 (measured in CH
2Cl
2, direct injection, calibrated).
Ligand Substitution (3-OH). Complex
1-OH (110 mg, 0.17 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (68 mg, 0.26 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (30 mL) and irradiated under IR monitoring. Subsequently, the solution was evaporated to dryness and the mixture was separated via column chromatography (silica gel,
n-pentane/diethylether 2:1) to give
3-OH as dark orange solid in 69% yield (103 mg, 0.12 mmol). A crystal suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction was obtained via vapor diffusion of
n-pentane into a diethylether solution.
X-ray crystallographic data is provided in the
Supplementary Materials. For atom numbering, see
Figure S10 of the
Supplementary Materials.
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 7.64 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 4H,
H-15), 7.63 (d,
3JHH = 8.5 Hz, 2H,
H-9), 7.54 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 4H,
H-14), 7.52-7.47 (m, 6H,
H-19), 7.36-7.33 (m, 9H,
H-20+
H-21), 7.23 (d,
3JHH = 8.5 Hz, 2H,
H-10), 5.38 (d,
3JHH = 6.0 Hz, 1H,
H-6), 4.76 (vq,
3JHH = 6.3 Hz, 1H,
H-4), 4.58 (vt,
3JHH = 6.0 Hz, 1H,
H-5), 3.93 (d,
3JHH = 6.6 Hz, 1H,
H-3), 3.51 (s, 3H,
H-1), 3.02 (s, 1H, O
H).
19F{1H}-NMR (376 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = -62.8 (s, C
F3).
31P{1H}-NMR (162 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 90.9 (s,
PPh
3).
13C{1H}-NMR (101 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 241.9 (d,
2JCP = 21 Hz,
CO-a), 240.4 (d,
2JCP = 20 Hz,
CO-b), 150.4 (
C-13), 145.1 (
C-11), 139.8 (d,
1JCP = 34 Hz,
C-18), 139.6 (
C-2), 136.8 (
C-8), 133.3 (d,
2JCP = 11 Hz,
C-19), 130.8 (
C-9), 129.9 (q,
2JCF = 33 Hz,
C-16), 129.4 (d,
4JCP = 2 Hz,
C-21), 128.7 (
C-14), 128.3 (d,
3JCP = 9 Hz,
C-20), 127.7 (
C-10), 125.5 (q,
3JCF = 4 Hz,
C-15), 124.6 (q,
1JCF = 272 Hz,
C-17), 94.1 (
C-4), 93.9 (
C-6), 93.2 (
C-7), 84.9 (
C-5), 81.7 (
C-12), 73.6 (
C-3), 55.8 (
C-1).
IR (CH
2Cl
2)
[cm
-1] = 1880, 1821.
ESI-MS calculated for C
48H
35CrF
6O
4P
+:
m/z = 872.1577 (M
+), found: 872.1608 (measured in CH
2Cl
2, direct injection, calibrated).
Synthesis of L-OH. Irradiation (λ = 465 nm) of
1-OH (60 mg, 94 μmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) and subsequent purification via column chromatography (silica gel,
n-pentane/dichloromethane 1:1) provided
L-OH as white solid in 75% yield (35 mg, 69 μmol).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 7.63 (d,
3JHH = 8.4 Hz, 4H,
H-15), 7.53 (d,
3JHH = 8.4 Hz, 4H,
H-14), 7.52 (d,
3JHH = 8.6 Hz, 2H,
H-9), 7.36-7.30 (m, 2H,
H-4+
H-6), 7.26 (d,
3JHH = 8.6 Hz, 2H,
H-10), 7.03 (vt,
3JHH = 7.5 Hz, 1H,
H-5), 7.01 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 1H,
H-3), 3.80 (s, 3H,
H-1), 3.02 (s, 1H, O
H).
19F{1H}-NMR (376 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = -62.8 (s, C
F3).
13C{1H}-NMR (101 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 156.9 (
C-2), 150.5 (
C-13), 144.4 (
C-11), 138.9 (
C-8), 131.1 (
C-6), 130.0 (
C-7), 129.9 (
C-4), 129.9 (q,
2JCF = 33 Hz,
C-16), 129.4 (
C-9), 128.7 (
C-14), 127.8 (
C-10), 125.5 (q,
3JCF = 4 Hz,
C-15), 124.6 (q,
1JCF = 272 Hz,
C-17), 121.2 (
C-5), 111.7 (
C-3), 81.8 (
C-12), 55.8 (
C-1).
ESI-MS calculated for C
28H
20F
6O
2:
m/z = 485.1335 (M
+ -OH), found: 485.1331 (measured in CH
2Cl
2, direct injection, calibrated). Representations of the spectra can be found as Figures S43 to S46 of the
Supplementary Materials.
Synthesis of Tritylium Complexes 1+ - 3+, L+. To the respective carbinol (1-OH - 3-OH, L-OH) in dichloromethane was added an equimolar amount of Brookhart’s acid at -70 °C (IR, for 1-OH - 3-OH), -78 °C (CV, for 3-OH) resp. r.t. (CV, for 1-OH, 2-OH, L-OH) or -40 °C (EPR, only for 1+ and 3+).
1-H and L-H. Decomposition products
1-H and
L-H were isolated from the decomposition of
3+ in CD
2Cl
2 at room temperature via column chromatography (silica gel,
n-pentane/ethyl acetate 4:1).
1-H: For atom numbering, see
Figure S27 of the
Supplementary Materials.
1H-NMR (600 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 7.60 (d,
3JHH = 8.0 Hz, 4H,
H-15), 7.51 (d,
3JHH = 8.0 Hz, 2H,
H-9), 7.30 (d,
3JHH = 8.0 Hz, 4H,
H-14), 7.12 (d,
3JHH = 8.0 Hz, 2H,
H-10), 5.81 (d,
3JHH = 6.1 Hz, 1H,
H-6), 5.71 (s, 1H,
H-12), 5.68 (vt,
3JHH = 6.5 Hz, 1H,
H-4), 5.20 (d,
3JHH = 6.7 Hz, 1H,
H-3), 5.03 (vt,
3JHH = 6.1 Hz, 1H,
H-5), 3.75 (s, 3H,
H-1).
19F{1H}-NMR (376 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = -62.8 (s, C
F3).
13C{1H}-NMR (151 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 233.7 (
CO), 147.3 (
C-13), 142.7 (
C-11), 142.2 (
C-2), 133.6 (
C-8), 131.0 (
C-9), 130.2 (
C-14), 129.3 (
C-10), 129.3 (q,
2JCF = 32 Hz,
C-16), 125.9 (q,
3JCF = 4 Hz,
C-15), 124.7 (q,
1JCF = 270 Hz,
C-17), 101.5 (
C-7), 99.2 (
C-6), 95.6 (
C-4), 85.4 (
C-5), 74.3 (
C-3), 56.5 (
C-12), 56.3 (
C-1).
IR (CH
2Cl
2)
[cm
-1] = 1880, 1821.
ESI-MS calculated for C
31H
20CrF
6O
4+:
m/z = 468.1413 (M
+ -CrCO
3), 623.0744 (M
+) found: 486.1412, 623.0697 (measured in CH
2Cl
2, direct injection, calibrated).
X-ray crystallographic data is provided in the
Supplementary Materials.
L-H: For atom numbering, see
Figure S32 of the
Supplementary Materials.
1H-NMR (800 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 7.59 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 4H,
H-15), 7.49 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 2H,
H-9), 7.34-7.28 (m, 5H,
H-4+
H-14), 7.30 (d,
3JHH = 7.5 Hz, 1H,
H-6), 7.13 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 2H,
H-10), 7.02 (vt,
3JHH = 7.5 Hz, 1H,
H-5), 7.00 (d,
3JHH = 8.3 Hz, 1H,
H-3), 5.71 (s, 1H,
H-12), 3.80 (s, 3H,
H-1).
19F{1H}-NMR (752 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = -62.7 (s, C
F3).
13C{1H}-NMR (202 MHz, CD
2Cl
2) δ [ppm] = 156.9 (
C-2), 147.7 (
C-13), 141.0 (
C-11), 137.8 (
C-8), 131.0 (
C-6), 130.2 (
C-7+
C-14+
C-9), 129.3 (
C-10), 129.2 (
C-4), 129.1 (q,
2JCF = 32 Hz,
C-16), 125.8 (q,
3JCF = 4 Hz,
C-15), 124.7 (q,
3JCF = 272 Hz,
C-17), 121.2 (
C-5), 111.6 (
C-3), 56.5 (
C-12), 55.8 (
C-1).
ESI-MS calculated for C
28H
20F
6O
2+:
m/z = 486.1413 (M
+), found: 486.1410 (measured in CH
2Cl
2, direct injection, calibrated).
X-ray crystallographic data is provided in the
Supplementary Materials.
Scheme 1.
Valence tautomerism (VT) in literature known ferrocene-trityl(ium) complexes relevant to this work [
12,
16].
Scheme 1.
Valence tautomerism (VT) in literature known ferrocene-trityl(ium) complexes relevant to this work [
12,
16].
Scheme 2.
Anticipated valence tautomeric equilibrium between diamagnetic [(η6-arene)Cr(CO)2L]-triarylmethylium complexes 1+ - 3+ (left) and their paramagnetic valence tautomers 1+•• - 3+•• (right).
Scheme 2.
Anticipated valence tautomeric equilibrium between diamagnetic [(η6-arene)Cr(CO)2L]-triarylmethylium complexes 1+ - 3+ (left) and their paramagnetic valence tautomers 1+•• - 3+•• (right).
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of carbinol precursors 1-OH - 3-OH and subsequent conversion to tritylium complexes 1+ - 3+: (i) 4-trifluoromethylphenyl lithium, THF, -78 °C - r.t., 16 h; (ii) corresponding ligand L, THF for 2-OH, toluene for 3-OH, hν, r.t., 5-10 min; (iii) HBArF24, CH2Cl2, -70 °C, 5 min.
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of carbinol precursors 1-OH - 3-OH and subsequent conversion to tritylium complexes 1+ - 3+: (i) 4-trifluoromethylphenyl lithium, THF, -78 °C - r.t., 16 h; (ii) corresponding ligand L, THF for 2-OH, toluene for 3-OH, hν, r.t., 5-10 min; (iii) HBArF24, CH2Cl2, -70 °C, 5 min.
Figure 1.
ORTEP of the Sp enantiomer of carbinol 3-OH with the atomic numbering and the hydrogen-bonded ether molecule. Ellipsoids are displayed at the 50% probability level. The hydrogen atoms of the triphenylphosphine ligand, a second ether solvent molecule, and disorders of the CF3 groups are omitted for clarity reasons.
Figure 1.
ORTEP of the Sp enantiomer of carbinol 3-OH with the atomic numbering and the hydrogen-bonded ether molecule. Ellipsoids are displayed at the 50% probability level. The hydrogen atoms of the triphenylphosphine ligand, a second ether solvent molecule, and disorders of the CF3 groups are omitted for clarity reasons.
Figure 2.
(a) Cyclic voltammograms of carbinols 1-OH - 3-OH (293±3 K). (b) Cyclic voltammograms of cations 1+ - 3+ (293±3, resp. 195±3 K for 3+) and of identified decomposition products 1-H and L+. Vertical lines in grey and blue indicate the half-wave potentials of the decomposition products. (c) Three-segment cyclic voltammogram of 3+ (195±3 K), starting at the open circuit potential marked by the arrow. Supporting electrolyte: CH2Cl2/ 0.1 M [NBu4]+ [BArF24]−, scan rate v = 100 mV s-1.
Figure 2.
(a) Cyclic voltammograms of carbinols 1-OH - 3-OH (293±3 K). (b) Cyclic voltammograms of cations 1+ - 3+ (293±3, resp. 195±3 K for 3+) and of identified decomposition products 1-H and L+. Vertical lines in grey and blue indicate the half-wave potentials of the decomposition products. (c) Three-segment cyclic voltammogram of 3+ (195±3 K), starting at the open circuit potential marked by the arrow. Supporting electrolyte: CH2Cl2/ 0.1 M [NBu4]+ [BArF24]−, scan rate v = 100 mV s-1.
Figure 3.
(a) IR spectra of 1-OH and 1+ in CH2Cl2 at -70 °C, (b) IR spectra of 3-OH and 3+ in CH2Cl2 at -70 °C, (c) baseline-corrected IR spectra of 3+ in the temperature range from -75 to -40 °C.
Figure 3.
(a) IR spectra of 1-OH and 1+ in CH2Cl2 at -70 °C, (b) IR spectra of 3-OH and 3+ in CH2Cl2 at -70 °C, (c) baseline-corrected IR spectra of 3+ in the temperature range from -75 to -40 °C.
Figure 4.
Experimental and simulated EPR spectra of diradical 3+•• at different temperatures. (a) Spectra in fluid solution at -70 °C; (b) in the temperature range from -90 to -40 °C; (c) in frozen CH2Cl2 at 77 K.
Figure 4.
Experimental and simulated EPR spectra of diradical 3+•• at different temperatures. (a) Spectra in fluid solution at -70 °C; (b) in the temperature range from -90 to -40 °C; (c) in frozen CH2Cl2 at 77 K.
Scheme 4.
Schematic representation of the procedure for quantitative EPR spectroscopy of
3+ and the dimerization of the paramagnetic valence tautomer
3+•• to
3+•-3+•. (1) Double integration of the EPR signal (DI), (2) comparison of the DI to a regression line recorded from the sTable 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (dpph
•) to yield the effective spin concentration, and (3) comparison of the spin concentration to the nominal concentration [
42].
Scheme 4.
Schematic representation of the procedure for quantitative EPR spectroscopy of
3+ and the dimerization of the paramagnetic valence tautomer
3+•• to
3+•-3+•. (1) Double integration of the EPR signal (DI), (2) comparison of the DI to a regression line recorded from the sTable 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (dpph
•) to yield the effective spin concentration, and (3) comparison of the spin concentration to the nominal concentration [
42].
Figure 5.
1H-NMR spectra of 1+ in CD2Cl2 after 12 h at r.t. (top), and of the purified decomposition products 1-H (middle) and L-H (bottom). [BArF24]− signals are marked with asterisks.
Figure 5.
1H-NMR spectra of 1+ in CD2Cl2 after 12 h at r.t. (top), and of the purified decomposition products 1-H (middle) and L-H (bottom). [BArF24]− signals are marked with asterisks.
Figure 6.
ORTEPs of the Rp enantiomer of 1-H (left) and L-H (right) with the atomic numbering. Ellipsoids are displayed at the 50% probability level. Disorders are omitted for clarity reasons.
Figure 6.
ORTEPs of the Rp enantiomer of 1-H (left) and L-H (right) with the atomic numbering. Ellipsoids are displayed at the 50% probability level. Disorders are omitted for clarity reasons.
Table 1.
Comparison of important bond lengths and angles of complexes 1′, 3-OH, 1-H, and L-H.
Table 1.
Comparison of important bond lengths and angles of complexes 1′, 3-OH, 1-H, and L-H.
|
1′ |
3-OH |
1-H |
L-H |
Crystal system |
triclinic |
monoclinic |
monoclinic |
orthorhombic |
Space group |
|
P21/c
|
P21/n
|
Pbca |
∠PhCr-Ph1
|
53.63(17)° |
52.55(14)° |
55.3(5)° |
47.09(8)° |
∠Ph1-Ph2
|
n.a. |
75.00(16)° |
78.1(5)° |
77.00(8)° |
∠Ph1-Ph3
|
n.a. |
76.50(18)° |
84.1(5)° |
82.95(8)° |
∠Ph1-C-OH
|
n.a. |
110.1(3)° |
n.a. |
n.a. |
∠Ph2-C-OH
|
n.a. |
105.9(3)° |
n.a. |
n.a. |
∠Ph3-C-OH
|
n.a. |
106.8(3)° |
n.a. |
n.a. |
d C-OH
|
n.a. |
1.433(4) |
n.a. |
n.a. |
d Cr-PhCr
|
1.7151(5) |
1.703(5) |
1.720(5) |
n.a. |
d Cr-CO1
|
1.837(4) |
1.821(3) |
1.819(12) |
n.a. |
d Cr-CO2
|
1.837(3) |
1.810(3) |
1.786(12) |
n.a. |
d Cr-CO3/P
|
1.844(5) |
2.303(1) |
1.801(12) |
n.a. |
Table 2.
Electrochemical data for carbinol precursors, cations and decomposition products.
Table 2.
Electrochemical data for carbinol precursors, cations and decomposition products.
|
Oxidation |
Reduction |
Potential Difference |
|
E1/2
|
ΔEp
|
E1/2
|
ΔEp
|
ΔE1/2
|
1-OH |
360 |
71 |
- |
- |
- |
2-OH |
110 |
81 |
- |
- |
- |
3-OH |
-265 |
68 |
- |
- |
- |
1+[a]
|
750 |
96 |
175 |
78 |
575 |
2+[b]
|
445 |
77 |
155 |
79 |
290 |
3+[c]
|
-180 |
110 |
-180 |
110 |
< 50 |
1-H |
435 |
83 |
- |
- |
- |
L+ |
- |
- |
135 |
72 |
- |
Table 3.
CO stretching vibrations for all complexes.
Table 3.
CO stretching vibrations for all complexes.
|
[cm-1] |
[cm-1] [a]
|
1-OH |
1965, 1886 |
1912 |
2-OH |
1910, 1853 |
1872 |
3-OH |
1880, 1821 |
1840 |
1+ |
1965, 1886 |
1912 |
2+ |
2012, 1964[b] 1904, 1848 |
1980 1867 |
3+ |
1988, 1940[b] 1878, 1819 |
1956 1839 |
1-H |
1965, 1888 |
1914 |