Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Lung Involvement in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Interlink between Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Lung Function

This is a preprint, it has not been peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

02 November 2023

Posted:

03 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
(1) Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by immune system dysregulation with frequent extraintestinal manifestations, including airways involvement. Reduction in CO diffusing capacity and functional alterations in small airways have been described. The extended analysis of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO), may distinguish the sites of production and the presence of small airways inflammation being a useful, non-invasive marker for these patient’s follow up. The aim of our study was to compare PFTs, FeNO and CANO values of UC patients with different clinical disease activity and healthy subjects to reveal lung function abnormalities and the presence of subclinical airway inflammation. (2) Methods: We enrolled 42 adult outpatients with different clinical activity stages of UC (mean age 39±13 years) and a healthy control group of 41 subjects (mean age 29±3 years). C-reactive protein (CRP) and FeNO values at different flows (50,100 and 200 ml/sec) were collected. All patients performed pulmonary function tests (PFT’s) with static volumes and diffusing capacity (DLCO). (3) Results: FENO, CANO and CRP values were significantly increased in UC patients when compared with controls (p=0.02 and p<0.0001, respectively) and proportionally to the disease activity (FeNO class 3: 27.1 ppb vs class 1-2: 6.2 ppb; CANO values class 3: 8.1 ppb vs class 1-2: 2.0 ppb (p < 0.0001). TLC and DLCO were significantly reduced in UC patients compared to controls (p=0.011 and p<0.0001, respectively). (4) The results of this study show significant lung functional abnormalities in UC patients and suggest the presence of airway inflammation directly correlated with the disease activity suggesting an integrated approach in routine assessment.
Keywords: 
  -  

1. Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by immune system dysregulation, leading to significant local tissue inflammation and frequent extra-intestinal manifestations. These include active airway involvement [1,2], which may worsen the disease prognosis [3]. Clinical and subclinical pulmonary abnormalities, such as functional alterations, especially in small airways, and impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide have been documented in patients with UC and other IBDs. These abnormalities may indicate the presence of a subclinical inflammatory state, even in absence of symptoms. However, evidence regarding the association of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) with disease activity remains controversial [4]. Some reports have indicated that these abnormalities also persist and have been observed during clinical remission of the disease, suggesting a latent subclinical inflammatory reaction [5]. Among recent, straightforward, non-invasive methods to assess airway inflammation, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement has proven effective in detecting and safely monitoring airway inflammatory status in various clinical conditions, in both adults and children [6]. Standardized procedures for measuring FeNO concentration have gained approval from the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) [7,8]. Moreover, advancements in the field of NO dynamics, exemplified by extended NO analysis, have provided valuable insights into the characterization and measurement of airway inflammation [9]. In particular, extended NO analysis, which involves measuring FeNO levels at multiple expiratory flow rates, enables the estimation of alveolar NO concentration (CANO) based on the total amount of FeNO [10]. This methodology facilitates the identification of specific sites responsible for FeNO production and offers potential insights into the presence of small airway inflammation. Thus, FeNO assessment can directly reflect airway inflammation and holds promise as a non-invasive marker for monitoring these patients during their follow-up. In line with the aforementioned advancements, the primary objective of the current study was to conduct a comparative analysis of PFTs and FeNO and CANO values between a cohort of UC outpatients displaying varying clinical disease activities and a control group of healthy subjects. This analysis aimed to uncover potential lung function abnormalities and evaluate the presence of subclinical airway inflammation in UC patients. Furthermore, we sought to determine whether a correlation existed between inflammatory markers, the primary sites of NO production and clinical disease activity. Lastly, we conducted a correlation analysis between FeNO, CANO, and systemic inflammation indexes, such as C-reactive protein (CRP).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Population.

For this study, we enrolled a cohort of 42 adult outpatients (mean age 39.02 ± 13.32 years), with different clinical activity stages of UC. These subjects had no concurrent pulmonary diseases and were attending the outpatient gastrointestinal clinic at the S. Andrea Hospital in Vercelli, Italy. In addition, we included a control group of 41 healthy subjects (mean age 29.54 ± 3.76 years), who were non-smokers and without a history of atopy. These subjects were selected from the general population and matched for age and sex. The diagnosis of UC was based on a combination of past medical history, physical examination, and radiological, endoscopic, and histological findings. We also recorded demographic information, clinical history, disease duration, prescribed medications, and disease extent assessment. The enrolled patients did not report any symptoms or signs of lung disease, such as cough, sputum, dyspnoea, and haemoptysis. We implemented exclusion criteria to account for potential factors that might influence FeNO levels, including cigarette smoking, atopy, respiratory tract infections over the previous 6 weeks, and lung diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and respiratory failure. Upon enrolment in the study, each patient belonging to the UC group received tailored treatment regimens involving topical and/or systemic administration of anti-inflammatory drugs (i.e., mesalazine), biological drugs (i.e., infliximab and adalimumab), and immunosuppressants (i.e., methotrexate and azathioprine). These treatment protocols were individualized, continuously monitored, and adjusted as needed. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board CE 67/20, in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients and control subjects provided informed written consent before participating in the study.

2.2. Study Design

We performed a single-centre, controlled, observational study. At the time of enrolment, all UC patients underwent a thorough examination and completed a specifically designed questionnaire to detect the presence and extent of both intestinal (i.e., abdominal pain, fever, frequency of defecation, and presence of blood in the faeces) and pulmonary (i.e., cough, sputum, dyspnoea, and haemoptysis) symptoms. In addition, we gathered demographic data, and clinical history and conducted macroscopic and histological evaluation of the disease. We also documented the duration and severity of the latter, medications used, and any existing co-morbidities. On the day of the initial FeNO measurement, a blood sample was collected for CRP analysis. Forty-one control subjects were subsequently enrolled from healthy volunteers whose medical history and physical exam were negative for UC. Following enrolment, all patients and control subjects underwent assessment, which included FeNO evaluation, lung function testing, comprising maximum expiratory flow volume curves and body plethysmography, as well as measurements of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO).

2.3. Disease Activity

The activity of UC was assessed by means of the colitis activity index (CAI), which classifies patients into three classes based on increasing clinical severity (1, 2, and 3) based on a score ranging from 0-12. UC patients that scored below 2 were considered as being in clinical remission, while those with scores exceeding 6 were identified as having an active disease. More precisely, the scoring criteria were as follows: < 2 for remission, 3-5 for mild activity, and 6-12 for moderate to severe activity [11]. In this study we considered class 1+2 as mild-moderate disease and class 3 as severe disease. Clinical evaluations were conducted, and therapy was tailored to individual patient needs to ensure optimal disease management.

2.4. Pulmonary Function Tests

All patients underwent PFTs, which included forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and static volume measurements, carried out using body plethysmography, and DLCO, performed through single-breath measurements. These tests were conducted following the completion of FeNO measurements, in accordance with established ATS/ERS guidelines [12,13,14]. Spirometry and maximal full flow-volume curve were obtained using a pneumotachograph with volume integrator (1070 MGC; CAD/Net system; Medical Graphics Corporation, St. Paul, MN, USA). The best values were selected from a minimum of three acceptable measurements. The results were expressed as a percentage of predicted normal values adjusted for sex, age, height, and weight. DLCO adjustments for lung volumes and hemoglobin values in UC patients were made in accordance with ATS/ERS recommendations [14] and by applying the formula proposed by Marrades et al. [15]. Predictions for DLCO and DLCO/alveolar volume (VA) were based on values referenced by de Jongste et al. [16].

2.5. FeNO and CANO Measurements

FeNO levels were assessed before spirometry by the single-breath method, using a high-resolution chemiluminescence NO analyzer (Ecomedics AG CLD 77 AM; Ecomedics; Durnten, Switzerland), with a 0.06 parts per billion (ppb) detection limit and an upper measuring range limit of 100 ppb. Measurements were performed at various flow rates, following ATS/ERS recommendations and employing a standardized procedure for the online measurement of FeNO in adults [7,8,9]. Single FeNO measurements were taken at a flow rate of 50 mL/s followed by measurements at multiple flow rates of 50, 100 and 200 ml/s. For each flow rate the mean value of three measurements was used. A mathematical approach based on a two-compartmental model was applied to distinguish NO generated in the distal airways (i.e., CANO) [17]. The CLD 77 analyzer was calibrated at 0 ppb and 100 ppb following the manufacturer's instructions. Daily calibration was performed using a certified NO mixture (96 ppb) in nitrogen (Messer S.p.A.; Collegno-TO, Italy). Ambient air was monitored for NO concentration prior to data collection, and measurements were only taken when ambient NO levels were below 10 ppb. Establishing a definitive normal range for FeNO is notoriously challenging, and reference values for FeNO have been defined for various groups, including healthy individuals, the elderly, and children [18,19,20,21,22]. For healthy individuals, the upper limit of FeNO50 has been defined by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Their data indicates that FeNO levels in individuals aged 12 to 80 typically fall within the range of 3.5 to 39 ppb, representing the 5th to 95th percentile [23]. In a recent review, the application of multiple regression modelling indicated normal values of FeNO in never-smoking adults, ranging from 24 to 53 ppb. The data showed that, in an unselected population, the distribution of FeNO was skewed to the right. Therefore, the authors concluded that reference values derived from a ‘normal’ population may be less useful than specific cut-off points for patients with airway disease or respiratory symptoms [24]. Considering the data previously discussed, we regarded all FeNO readings below 25 ppb at a constant flow rate of 50 mL/s as normal, without clinical relevance. All tests were conducted in the morning, at the same time, with patients required to have an empty stomach. Patients treated with biological drugs (i.e., infliximab and adalimumab) were carefully examined prior to each injection.

2.6. CRP Collection

CRP values were determined from venous blood samples of UC patients drawn as part of routine clinical assessment, which comprised a full blood count and CRP measurement. No blood samples were drawn from the healthy control group.

2.7. Endpoints and Statistical Analysis

The primary objective of this study was to compare lung function parameters, FeNO, and CANO levels in UC patients exhibiting different clinical disease activity with those from a healthy control group. In addition, in the UC subgroup, we assessed the correlation between FeNO, CANO, and systemic inflammation indexes, such as CRP. Data were presented with frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as median (1st-3rdquartile) for continuous variables. Two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare non parametric variables. Median differences between UC and healthy control group were compared with the use of the two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test due to the non-normality of the variables. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated to examine the correlation between FeNO, CANO and systemic inflammation indexes (CRP) in UC subgroup. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (SAS institute, Cary, NC, USA) software.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants

The baseline clinical characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. A total of 83 patients were enrolled, consisting of 42 UC patients (50.6%) and 41 healthy subjects (49.4%). Among the entire study cohort, 39/83 subjects were males (46.9%), with 22/42 being UC patients (52.4%) and 17/41 healthy controls (41.4%). The median age for UC patients was 36 years, ranging from 31 to 43 years, while that of healthy controls was 29 years, with a range from 27 to 32 years. The body mass index (BMI) did not show any significant difference between the two groups, with a value of 22.0 (20.7-24.9) in UC patients and 22.8 (21.7-23.8) in healthy subjects. Regarding disease activity in the UC group, 3 subjects (7.1%) displayed mild disease activity (Mayo score: 1), 13 subjects (30.9%) had moderate disease activity (Mayo score: 2), and 26 patients (46.9%) presented severe disease activity (Mayo score: 3). The median value of CRP in the UC group was 12.9 mg/dl (range: 6.1-35.5 mg/dl).

3.2. Pulmonary Function Tests

None of the patients in either group exhibited an FEV1/FVC ratio below 70% or an FEV1 value lower than 70% of the predicted one, indicating the absence of airway obstruction. UC patients had a median FEV1/FVC ratio of 84 (range: 78-88%), a median predicted FEV1 of 95% (range: 92-99%), and a median predicted FVC of 92% (range: 88-96%). In contrast, the control group showed a median FEV1/FVC ratio of 84% (82-87%), a median predicted FEV1 of 97% (94-104), and a median predicted FVC of 96% (92-99%). We observed a statistically significant reduction of FVC values in the UC group (p = 0.0028) when compared to healthy subjects. However, there were no statistically significant differences between FEV1 and FEV1/FVC measurements in the two groups (p = 0.06 and 0.163, respectively). Regarding lung volumes no restrictive pattern was observed, with TLC values not falling below 80% of predictive values in both groups. Nevertheless, it is important to point out that the predictive TLC values were significantly lower in the UC group, with median values of 90% (range: 82-98 %), compared to those of the control group, which had median values of 98% (range: 90-106%) (p = 0.011). Predicted DLCO values were markedly lower in the UC group, with a median predictive value of 78% (range: 73-82%), compared to control group, where it was 102% (range: 96-112%) (p < 0.0001). It is also worth mentioning that DLCO values below 80% of the predicted value indicate a mild reduction in CO diffusion, which is considered clinically relevant for these patients (Table 2 and Figure 1).

3.3. FeNO Measurements

FeNO values were significantly increased in UC patients in comparison with those from healthy controls. The median bronchial FeNO at 50 ml/sec was 18.3 ppb (range: 6.7-34 ppb) for UC patients, whereas healthy controls had a median of 10.1 ppb (range: 8-12 ppb) (p = 0.02). A similar trend was observed for CANO levels, which were also significantly higher in UC patients. Specifically, the median CANO levels were 5.9 ppb (range: 2.1-10 ppb) for UC patients, whereas healthy controls displayed a median of 2.05 ppb (range: 1.5-2.5 ppb; p < 0.0001) (Table 2 and Figure 2).

3.4. Lung Function, FeNO, CRP, and Correlation with Clinical Disease Activity

The correlation between pulmonary function and inflammatory indexes with clinical disease activity in the subgroup of UC patients was evaluated. Table 3 presents lung function, CRP, and exhaled NO measurements for the UC subgroup categorized by disease activity (Mayo Score). Notably, we observed a significant increase in FeNO, CANO, and CRP values that corresponded with disease activity, especially in its severe form. The median FeNO values for class 3 (severe) were 27.1 ppb (18.4-38.4) compared to class 1-2 (mild) at 6.2 ppb (range: 4.4-8.7) (p < 0.0001). Similarly, for CANO the median values for class 3 were 8.1 ppb (6.1-11.0), while classes 1-2 had median values of 2.0 ppb (1.4-2.8) (p < 0.0001). CPR values followed the same trend, with median values of 23 mg/dl (12.0-45.0) for class 3 compared to 5.8 mg/dl (2.0-16.1) for class 1-2 (p= 0.0007). These findings indicate a strong relationship between these markers and disease activity in the UC subgroup. It is worth noting that in severe cases of UC (class 3), the FeNO measurement exceeded the upper normal limit, reaching pathological values, even in the absence of respiratory symptoms or conditions (Figure 3). We observed a reduction in DLCO and TLC values in severe UC patients, however, no statistically significant correlation was observed between clinical disease activity and the functional parameters FEV1, FVC, TLC, and DLCO (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The results from our study reveal a remarkable subclinical inflammatory involvement of the lungs in UC patients related to disease activity, as evidenced by significantly elevated FeNO and CANO levels compared to those observed in healthy controls. Furthermore, our findings show significant alterations in lung volumes and DLCO in these patients, which is consistent with the hypothesis that mechanisms affecting both central and distal airways may be at play. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to comprehensively assess bronchial and distal airway inflammation through extended NO analysis alongside PFTs (e.g., DLCO and lung volumes). IBDs, such as UC, exhibit a wide spectrum of lung involvement, ranging from subclinical abnormalities to airway or interstitial lung disease (ILD) [25]. These lung abnormalities can manifest at various stages of the disease, including at its onset, during active disease [26], or even following surgical interventions. The underlying pathogenesis may be linked to a shared embryonic origin of colonic and respiratory epithelial cells, along with similarities in mucosal immunity, leading to analogous pathogenetic alterations [27]. Previous studies have shown a prevalence of PTF abnormalities ranging from 17% to 55% in UC patients, underscoring the potential to identify occult pulmonary conditions at an early stage using functional indexes [28]. In our study, we report a significant reduction in FVC values in the UC group compared to healthy subjects. However, we found no differences between FEV1 and FEV1/FVC measurements in both groups, nor did we identify obstructive dysfunction or a correlation with disease activity. In line with our results, previous research has shown isolated reductions in absolute values of FEV1, FVC, and forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75%) [29,30,31,32,33]. More specifically, obstructive dysfunction was observed at times associated with disease activity [34,35]. Although our study demonstrates a significant reduction in lung volumes, particularly TLC, among UC patients compared to controls, indicative of subclinical restrictive ventilatory dysfunction, we did not find a significant correlation with disease severity (p = 0.07). Nonetheless, there was a notable reduction in TLC values among patients with a Mayo score of 3, although it did not reach statistical significance. The existing literature presents conflicting findings regarding lung volumes in patients with UC. While most studies have reported increased lung volumes (i.e., TLC, RV, and FRC) in individuals with IBD, often linked to disease activity [26,36,37], implying possible bronchial or bronchiolar inflammation and obstruction [38], other studies have shown decreased lung volumes in children [32,39]. Several mechanisms might be responsible for the observed alterations in spirometry measurements among these patients. One hypothesis suggests that a loss of body proteins and a reduction in BMI may indicate poor nutritional status, potentially contributing to reduced spirometry parameters [31,40]. Another explanation relates to an elevated percentage of alveolar lymphocytes, sensitized from the gastrointestinal tract, which may lead to lung alveolitis, thereby altering PFT results [31,41,42,43,44]. Of particular significance in our study is the observed reduction in DLCO. Indeed, our data show a statistically significant decrease in DLCO in UC patients compared to healthy subjects, reaching clinical relevance (78 % of predicted values). Similar to our findings for TLC, we did not establish a statistically significant correlation with DLCO values and the severity of the disease (p = 0.06), although there was a discernible reduction in DLCO values among patients with a more severe form of the disease. These results are in line with previously reported data in the literature. DLCO stands out as the most frequently reported abnormality in PFTs in both adults and children with IBD [5,34,45,46,47]. Furthermore, several studies have recorded alterations in DLCO consistent with ILD, and these changes have been associated with disease activity [26,32,34,35]. The precise pathophysiological cause of this DLCO reduction remains poorly understood. Current theories propose an imbalance in IBD patients involving an altered immune response to the gut microbiota [48,49,50], disrupting the intestinal epithelial barrier and allowing immunoreactive gut cells to migrate to lung tissues. This migration is then thought to trigger an intense cross talk between intestinal and pulmonary immune cells [51,52]. Moreover, the inflamed gut mucosa in IBD is associated with increased levels of nonspecific inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, reactive oxygen radicals, and NO [53]. These factors collectively contribute to inflammation and oxidative stress, which may, in turn, lead to impaired DLCO. The primary finding of our study underscores a substantial increase in FeNO and CANO levels recorded among UC patients when compared to the healthy control group. In addition, we report a statistically significant correlation between the levels of FeNO and CANO and the severity of the disease, with higher values observed in UC patients with a Mayo score of 3, indicating severe disease activity. NO plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes involving the gastrointestinal tract, and it is recognized as a key inflammatory mediator in IBD. Previous research has shown increased NO levels in colonic gases of UC patients in comparison with control subjects [54]. FeNO originates from the airway epithelial cells through upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (i-NOS) activity. Of note, FeNO has not only been found elevated in patients with IBD but is also positively associated with disease activity [55,56,57,58,59]. On the other hand, CANO represents a marker of small airway inflammation, extensively investigated in conditions such as asthma [60,61,62,63,64,65] and other pulmonary diseases [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. Moreover, increased CANO values have been found even in the absence of disease activity, indicating a subclinical involvement of small airways [5]. In our study, we observe that FeNO and CANO values increase in parallel with disease activity, suggesting a correlation between airway inflammation and the clinical severity of intestinal disease. This finding hints at the involvement of alveolar sites (alveolitis) and small vessel compartment of the lung in chronic IBD.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of the present study align with existing evidence that UC patients, especially those with active disease, present significant lung functional abnormalities. This is accompanied by increased inflammatory markers in the exhaled air, suggesting subclinical lung inflammation associated with IBD activity. The evidence of distal airway involvement, as demonstrated by elevated CANO levels and reduction of the efficiency of the pulmonary alveolocapillary diffusion mechanism, underscores a complex interplay between autoimmune diseases and the pulmonary interstitium, leading to small-airway damage. This distally localized form of damage is likely caused by circulating factors and immune complexes, ultimately leading to increased bronchial inflammation, which affects the proximal or large airways. Thus, while larger prospective studies are necessary to confirm the presence of this subclinical entity, it seems that IBDs like UC exhibit characteristics of a multisystemic inflammatory disease affecting numerous systems, including the lungs. In clinical practice only a small proportion of UC patients are identified as suffering from pulmonary disfunction. Therefore, clinicians should be vigilant in recognizing early signs of lung dysfunction. In this regards, pulmonary function testing through volume and DLCO measurements may constitute an affordable, easily accessible, and non-invasive method for the early detection of latent lung involvement. As newer non-invasive methods advance, including the measurement of FeNO and markers of oxidative stress, and possibly the inclusion of induced sputum for cytological analysis, these techniques may provide us with additional information about the inflammatory status in specific patients. This, in turn, can help us better understand the causes behind pulmonary diseases. In UC patients, our findings emphasize the significance of routine assessments using an integrated approach combining lung function assessment with non-invasive monitoring of airway inflammation through exhaled NO measurement. Overall, we strongly advocate for close collaboration between gastroenterologists and pulmonologists to enhance the effectiveness of therapy through a robust multidisciplinary approach.

6. Limitations

A limitation of our study is the relatively small sample size. Furthermore, numerous confounding factors could potentially influence our FeNO analysis. Given that all the patients were already receiving anti-inflammatory therapies and biologics at the time of enrolment, it becomes challenging to precisely differentiate between alterations that may have existed prior to treatment and those possibly related to therapy. These variations may, in fact, correspond to distinct stages in each patient's clinical and treatment history. Lastly, we did not perform bronchoprovocation tests or collected any radiological data.
Abbreviations: IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; UC, Ulcerative Colitis; CAI, colitis activity index; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CANO, alveolar concentration of nitric oxide; CRP, C-reactive protein; PFTs, pulmonary function tests; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; TLC, total lung volume; DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; %, percentage of predicted; ATS, American Thoracic Society; ERS, European Respiratory Society; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ILD, interstitial lung disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.R., P.Pi, P.Po, M.M; Data curation, B.R., P.Po., P.Pi.; Formal analysis, T.C.; Investigation, B.R, P.Po., P.Pi; Methodology, B.R., P.Po; Resources, B.R., P.Po.; Visualization, B.R.,TC.; Writing—original draft, B.R., T.C., P.Po, M.M., ; Writing—review and editing, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Comitato Etico Interaziendale di Alessandria CE 67/20.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available by the authors. For any further request contact the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, et al. The prevalence of extraintestinal diseases in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, Apr;96(4):1116-22. [CrossRef]
  2. Nikolaus S, Schreiber S. Diagnostics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:1670–1689. [CrossRef]
  3. Rothfuss KS, Stange EF, et al. Extraintestinal manifestations and complications in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12:4819-4831. [CrossRef]
  4. Georgakopoulou V.E, Tarantinos K, et al. Role of pulmonary function testing in inflammatory bowel diseases (Review). Med Int (Lond). 2022, Jul-Aug; 2(4): 25. [CrossRef]
  5. Herrlinger KR, Noftz MK, et al. Alterations in pulmonary function in inflammatory bowel disease are frequent and persist during remission. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002, 97:377-81. [CrossRef]
  6. Ragnoli B, Radaeli A, et al. Fractional nitric oxide measurement in exhaled air (FeNO): perspectives in the management of respiratory diseases. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2023, Vol. 14: 1–17. [CrossRef]
  7. ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2005. [CrossRef]
  8. Horváth I, Barnes PJ, et al. A european respiratory society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease. Eur Respir J 2017, 49: 1600965. [CrossRef]
  9. Högman M, Malinovschi A, et al. Added value with extended NO analysis in atopy and asthma. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2011, 31:294–299. [CrossRef]
  10. George SC, Hogman M, et al. Modeling pulmonary nitric oxide exchange. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2004, 96:831-9. [CrossRef]
  11. Lewis JD, Chuai S, et al. Use of the noninvasive components of the mayo score to assess clinical response in Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008, 14(12):1660–1666. [CrossRef]
  12. Miller, M.R.; Hankinson, J. et al. Standardization of spirometry. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 319–338.
  13. Wanger J, Clausen JL, et al. Standardization of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26: 511–522. [CrossRef]
  14. MacIntyre N, Crapo RO, et al. Standardization of the single breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J 2005, 26: 720– 735. [CrossRef]
  15. Marrades RM, Diaz O, et al. Adjustment of DLCO for hemoglobin concentration. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997, 155: 236–241. [CrossRef]
  16. de Jongste JC, Merkus PJFM, et al. Lung diffusing capacity; in Hammer J, Eber E (eds): Paediatric Pulmonary Function Testing. Progr Respir Res. Basel, Karger, 2005, vol 33, pp 157–165.
  17. Nikolaus M, Tsoukias M, et al. A two-compartment model of pulmonary nitric oxide exchange dynamics. Appl Physiol 1998, 85(2):65366. [CrossRef]
  18. Olivieri M, Talamini G, et al. Reference values for exhaled nitric oxide (reveno) study. Respir Res 2006, 7: 94. [CrossRef]
  19. Olin A-C, Bake B et al. Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide at 50 mL/s: reference values for adult lifelong never-smokers. Chest 2007, 131: 1852–1856. [CrossRef]
  20. Kovesi T, Kulka R et al. Exhaled nitric oxide concentration is affected by age, height, and race in healthy 9- to 12-year-old children. Chest 2008, 133: 169–175. [CrossRef]
  21. Dweik, R.A.; Boggs, P.B. et al. American Thoracic Society Committee on Interpretation of Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels (FENO) for Clinical Applications. An official ATS clinical practice guideline: Interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 602–615. [CrossRef]
  22. Malerba M, Damiani G, et al. Values in elderly people for exhaled nitric oxide study. Rejuvenation Res 2016, 19: 233–238. [CrossRef]
  23. See KC and Christiani DC. Normal values and thresholds for the clinical interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels in the US general population: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey 2007-2010. Chest 2013, 143: 107–116. [CrossRef]
  24. Guida G, Bagnasco D, et al. Critical evaluation of asthma biomarkers in clinical practice. Front Med 2022, 9: 969243. [CrossRef]
  25. Storch I, Sachar D et al. Pulmonary manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2003, 9: 104-115. [CrossRef]
  26. Songür N, Songür Y, et al. Pulmonary function tests and high-resolution CT in the detection of pulmonary involvement in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003, 37: 292-298. [CrossRef]
  27. Black H, Mendoza M, et al. Thoracic manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Chest 2007, 131:524-32. [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta SJ, Gupta VL, et al. Assessment of occult pulmonary involvement in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Intest Dis 2020, 5: 144-150. [CrossRef]
  29. Godet PG, Cowie R, et al. Pulmonary function abnormalities in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997, 92:1154-1156.
  30. Dierkes-Globisch A and Mohr H: Pulmonary function abnormalities in respiratory asymptomatic patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Intern Med 2002, 13: 385. [CrossRef]
  31. Mohamed-Hussein AA, Mohamed NA et al. Changes in pulmonary function in patients with ulcerative colitis. Respir Med 2007, 101: 977-982. [CrossRef]
  32. Ji XQ, Wang LX et al. Pulmonary manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014, 20:13501-13511. [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao Y, Wang J, et al. Pulmonary dysfunction in 114 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017, 96: e6808. [CrossRef]
  34. Yilmaz A, Yilmaz Demirci N, et al. A Pulmonary involvement in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010, 16: 4952-4957. [CrossRef]
  35. Ellrichmann M, Bethge J, et al. Subclinical pulmonary involvement in active IBD responds to biologic therapy. J Crohns Colitis 2021, 15: 1339-1345. [CrossRef]
  36. Tunc B, Filik L, et al. Pulmonary function tests, high-resolution computed tomography findings and inflammatory bowel disease. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2006, 69: 255-260.
  37. Wallaert B, Colombel JF, et al. Evidence of lymphocyte alveolitis in Crohn's disease. Chest 1985, 87: 363-367. [CrossRef]
  38. Lee MK, Yoon HK, et al. Nonspecific bronchoprovocation test. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2017, 80: 344-350. [CrossRef]
  39. Chatzimichael A and Paraskakis E: Elevated levels of alveolar nitric oxide may indicate presence of small airway inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Lung 2019, 197: 663-670. [CrossRef]
  40. Christie PM and Hill GL: Effect of intravenous nutrition on nutrition and function in acute attacks of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1990, 90: 730-736. [CrossRef]
  41. Tzanakis NE, Tsiligianni IG, et al. Pulmonary involvement and allergic disorders in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010, 16:299–305. [CrossRef]
  42. Keely S, Talley NJ, et al. Pulmonary-intestinal cross-talk in mucosal inflammatory disease. Mucosal Immunol 2012, 5:7–18. [CrossRef]
  43. D’Andrea N, Vigliarolo R, et al. Respiratory involvement in inflammatory bowel diseases. Multidiscip Respir Med 2010, 5:173–82. [CrossRef]
  44. Fireman E, Masarwy F, et al. Induced sputum eosinophilia in ulcerative colitis patients: the lung as a mirror image of intestine? Respir Med 2009, 103:1025–32. [CrossRef]
  45. Marvisi M, Borrello PD, Brianti M, et al. Changes in the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung in ulcerative colitis. Eur Respir J. 2000, 16:965-968. [CrossRef]
  46. Sethy PK, Dutta U, et al. Pulmonary and hematological alterations in idiopathic ulcerative colitis. Indian J Gastroenterol 2003, 22: 176-179. [PubMed]
  47. Ateş F, Karincaoğlu M, Hacievlıyagıl SS, et al. Alterations in the pulmonary function tests of inflammatory bowel diseases. Turk J Gastroenterol 2011, 22: 293-299. [CrossRef]
  48. Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK: Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2007, 448: 427–434. [CrossRef]
  49. Abraham C, Cho JH: Inflammatory bowel disease. Mechanisms of disease. N Engl J Med 2009, 361: 2066–2078.
  50. Salzman NH, Bevins CL: Negative interactions with the microbiota: IBD. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008, 635: 67–78. [CrossRef]
  51. Salmi M, Jalkanen S: Lymphocyte homing to the gut: attraction, adhesion, and commitment. Immunol Rev 2005; 206: 100–113. [CrossRef]
  52. Keely S, Talley NJ, Hansbro PM: Pulmonary intestinal cross-talk in mucosal inflammatory disease. Immunology 2012; 5: 7–18. [CrossRef]
  53. Ozyilmaz E, Yildirim B, et al. Is there any link between oxidative stress and lung involvement due to inflammatory bowel disease: an experimental study. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58: 1898–903. [CrossRef]
  54. Lundberg JO, Hellstrom PM, et al. Greatly increased luminal nitric oxide in ulcerative colitis. Lancet 1994; 344(8938): 1673-74. [CrossRef]
  55. Koek GH, Verleden GM, et al. Activity related increase of exhaled nitric oxide in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: A manifestation of systemic involvement? Respir Med 2002 96: 530-535. [CrossRef]
  56. Malerba M, Ragnoli B. Exhaled nitric oxide as a marker of lung involvement in Crohn’s disease. International Journal of Immunology and Immunopathology. 2011, 24(4):1119-1124. [CrossRef]
  57. Quenon L, Hindryckx P, et al. Hand-held fractional exhaled nitric oxide measurements as a non-invasive indicator of systemic inflammation in Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013, 7: 644-648. [CrossRef]
  58. Ozyilmaz E, Yildirim B, et al. Value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO) for the diagnosis of pulmonary involvement due to inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010, 16: 670-676. [CrossRef]
  59. Ikonomi E, Rothstein RD, et al. Measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide as a marker of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol Pancreatol Liver Disord 2016. 3. [CrossRef]
  60. Protopapas AA, Vradelis S, et al. Elevated levels of alveolar nitric oxide may indicate presence of small airway inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Lung 2019, 197: 663-670. [CrossRef]
  61. Paraskakis E, Brindicci C, et alMeasurement of bronchial and alveolar nitric oxide production in normal children and children with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 174(3):260–267. [CrossRef]
  62. Lázár Z, Horváth P, et al. A suitable protocol for measuring alveolar nitric oxide in asthma with differing severity to assess peripheral airways inflammation. J Asthma 2019; 56: 584–593. [CrossRef]
  63. Berry M, Hargadon B, et al. Alveolar nitric oxide in adults with asthma: evidence of distal lung inflammation in refractory asthma. Eur Respir J 2005, 25(6):986–991. [CrossRef]
  64. van Veen IH, Sterk PJ, et al. Alveolar nitric oxide versus measures of peripheral airway dysfunction in severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2006, 27(5):951–956. [CrossRef]
  65. Williamson PA, Clearie K, et al. Assessment of small-airways disease using alveolar nitric oxide and impulse oscillometry in asthma and COPD. Lung 2011, 189(2):121–129. [CrossRef]
  66. Suri R, Paraskakis E, et alAlveolar, but not bronchial nitric oxide production is elevated in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007, 42(12):1215–1221. [CrossRef]
  67. Brindicci C, Ito K, et al. Exhaled nitric oxide from lung periphery is increased in COPD. Eur Respir J 2005, 26(1):52–59. [CrossRef]
  68. Lázár Z, Kelemen Gálffy G, et al. Central and peripheral airway nitric oxide in patients with stable and exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Breath Res 2018; 12: 036017. [CrossRef]
  69. Cameli P, Bargagli E, et al. Extended exhaled nitric oxide analysis in interstitial lung diseases: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 6187. [CrossRef]
  70. Malerba M, Ragnoli B et al. Exhaled nitric oxide levels in alpha-1-antitrypsin PiMZ subjects. J Intern Med 2009; 265: 382–387. [CrossRef]
  71. Vincken S, Sylvia V, et al. The role of FeNO in stable COPD patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Respir Med 2021; 181: 106377. [CrossRef]
  72. Yamaji Y, Oishi K, et al. Detection of type 2 biomarkers for response in COPD. J Breath Res 2020; 14: 026007. [CrossRef]
  73. Malerba M, Radaeli A, et al. Exhaled Nitric Oxide as a Biomarker in COPD and Related Comorbidities. BioMed Res Int 2014;2014: 271918. [CrossRef]
Preprints 89542 g001
Figure 1. Comparison between lung volumes (TLC) and monoxide diffusing capacity (TLCO) in patients with UC and control group. There is a statistically significant reduction of TLC and TLCO in the two groups (Wilcoxon rank sum test =2.52, p-value < 0.05 for TLC, Wilcoxon rank sum test = 6.87, p-value < 0.0001 for DLCO, respectively). Statistical comparison of the differences between mean values of continuous variables in the two groups of UC and controls was done using a nonparametric test (Wilcoxon Rank sum test). Abbreviations: UC, Ulcerative Colitis; TLC, total lung volume; DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; %, percentage of predicted.
Figure 1. Comparison between lung volumes (TLC) and monoxide diffusing capacity (TLCO) in patients with UC and control group. There is a statistically significant reduction of TLC and TLCO in the two groups (Wilcoxon rank sum test =2.52, p-value < 0.05 for TLC, Wilcoxon rank sum test = 6.87, p-value < 0.0001 for DLCO, respectively). Statistical comparison of the differences between mean values of continuous variables in the two groups of UC and controls was done using a nonparametric test (Wilcoxon Rank sum test). Abbreviations: UC, Ulcerative Colitis; TLC, total lung volume; DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; %, percentage of predicted.
Preprints 89542 g001
Preprints 89542 g002
Figure 2. Comparison between bronchial (FeNO) and alveolar (CANO) nitric oxide in patients with UC and control group. FeNO and CANO levels are significantly increased in the UC group (Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 2.19, p-value < 0.05 for FeNO, Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 4.36, p-value < 0.0001 for CANO, respectively). Statistical comparison of the differences between mean values of continuous variables in the two groups of UC and controls was done using a non-parametric test (Wilcoxon Rank sum test). Abbreviations: UC, Ulcerative Colitis; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CANO, alveolar concentration of nitric oxide.
Figure 2. Comparison between bronchial (FeNO) and alveolar (CANO) nitric oxide in patients with UC and control group. FeNO and CANO levels are significantly increased in the UC group (Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 2.19, p-value < 0.05 for FeNO, Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 4.36, p-value < 0.0001 for CANO, respectively). Statistical comparison of the differences between mean values of continuous variables in the two groups of UC and controls was done using a non-parametric test (Wilcoxon Rank sum test). Abbreviations: UC, Ulcerative Colitis; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CANO, alveolar concentration of nitric oxide.
Preprints 89542 g002
Preprints 89542 g003
Figure 3. Comparison between disease activity, bronchial (FeNO), alveolar (CANO) nitric oxide levels and CRP levels in patients with UC. FeNO and CANO levels and CRP levels are significantly increased in the UC patients with active disease (CAI 2,3). (Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 4.54, p-value < 0.0001 for FeNO, Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 4.35, p-value < 0.0001 for CANO, Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 3.39, p-value < 0.05, respectively). Statistical comparison of the differences between mean values of continuous variables in the two groups of UC and controls was done using a non-parametric test (Wilcoxon Rank sum test). Abbreviations: UC, Ulcerative Colitis; CRP, C-reactive protein; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CANO, alveolar concentration of nitric oxide.
Figure 3. Comparison between disease activity, bronchial (FeNO), alveolar (CANO) nitric oxide levels and CRP levels in patients with UC. FeNO and CANO levels and CRP levels are significantly increased in the UC patients with active disease (CAI 2,3). (Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 4.54, p-value < 0.0001 for FeNO, Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 4.35, p-value < 0.0001 for CANO, Wilcoxon rank sum test = - 3.39, p-value < 0.05, respectively). Statistical comparison of the differences between mean values of continuous variables in the two groups of UC and controls was done using a non-parametric test (Wilcoxon Rank sum test). Abbreviations: UC, Ulcerative Colitis; CRP, C-reactive protein; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CANO, alveolar concentration of nitric oxide.
Preprints 89542 g003
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study population. Dichotomous values are expressed as numbers and percentages, while continuous values are represented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Disease activity is denoted using the Mayo score, with values of 1 indicating mild disease, 2 reflecting intermediate disease, and 3 signifying severe disease.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study population. Dichotomous values are expressed as numbers and percentages, while continuous values are represented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Disease activity is denoted using the Mayo score, with values of 1 indicating mild disease, 2 reflecting intermediate disease, and 3 signifying severe disease.
Variable All n= 83 UC n=42 Controls n=41
Age, years (IQR) 32 (28-37) 36 (31-43) 29 (27-32)
Male sex, n (%) 39 (46.9) 22 (52.4) 17 (41.4)
BMI, (IQR) 22.7 (21-24.2) 22 (20.7-24.9) 22.8 (21.7-23.8)
Disease activity, n (%) 42 (100)
Mild (1) 3 (7.1)
Intermediate (2) 13 (31)
Severe (3) 26 (61.9)
UC, ulcerative colitis; BMI, body mass index; M, males; F, females.
Table 2. Lung function and exhaled NO measurements in controls and UC patients. Dichotomous values are presented as numbers and percentages, while continuous values are displayed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR).
Table 2. Lung function and exhaled NO measurements in controls and UC patients. Dichotomous values are presented as numbers and percentages, while continuous values are displayed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR).
Variable All n= 83 UC n=42 Controls n=41 p*
Lung function
FVC - %, (IQR) 94 (90-98) 92 (88-96) * 96 (92-99) 0.0028
FEV1/FVC - %, (IQR) 84 (81-87) 84 (78-88) 84 (82-87) 0.1634
FEV1 - %, (IQR) 97 93-103) 95 (92-99) 97 (94-104) 0.0694
TLC - %, (IQR) 96 (86-104) 90 (82-98) * 98 (90-106) 0.0116
DLCO - %, (IQR) 90 (78-103) 78 (73-82) * 102 (96-112) < 0.0001
Inflammatory markers
CRP - mg/dl, (IQR) NA 12.9 (6.1-35.5) NA
FeNO - ppb, (IQR) 10.8 (7.9-18.4) 18.3 (6.7-34.1) * 10.1 (8.2-12) 0.0278
CANO - ppb, (IQR) 2.4 (1.8-6.1) 5.9 (2.1-10) * 2.1(1.5-2.5) < 0.0001
UC, ulcerative colitis; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in first second; TLC, total lung volume; DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; %, percentage of predicted; CRP, C-reactive protein; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CANO, alveolar concentration of nitric oxide; n.s, not significant; * p < 0.05, p-values for two group comparison (UC vs controls, respectively).
Table 3. Lung function, CRP, and exhaled nitric oxide measurements in the UC patient subgroup by disease activity according to Mayo score. Data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR).
Table 3. Lung function, CRP, and exhaled nitric oxide measurements in the UC patient subgroup by disease activity according to Mayo score. Data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR).
Variable Mild (1-2) n= 16 Severe (3) n=26 p
Age, years (IQR) 35.0 (32.5-38.0) 37.0 (30.0-43.0) N.S.
BMI, (IQR) 21.5 (19.3-25.9) 21.5 (19.3-25.9) N.S.
CANO – ppb, (IQR) 2.0 (1.4-2.8) 8.1 (6.1-11.0) * < 0.0001
FeNO – ppb, (IQR) 6.2 (4.4-8.7) 27.1 (18.4-38.4) * < 0.0001
CRP - mg/dl, (IQR) 5.8 (2.0-16.1) 23.0 (12.0-45.0) * 0.0007
TLC - %, (IQR) 98.0 (89.5-102.0) 88.0 (80.0-98.0) 0.0769
DLCO - %, (IQR) 84.5 (76.0-93.5) 77.5 (72.0-80.0) 0.0624
UC, Ulcerative colitis; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in first second; TLC, total lung volume; DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; %, percentage of predicted; CRP, C-reactive protein; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; CaNO, alveolar concentration of nitric oxide; n.s, not significant; * p < 0.05, p-values for two group comparison (severe vs mild-intermediate UC, respectively).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Alerts
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated