1. Introduction
Obesity and overweight are global health issues with the exacerbation of cardiovascular risk and metabolic syndrome, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia with low high-density lipoproteins (HDL)-cholesterol and high triglyceride [
1,
2]. Sedentary lifestyles are a major risk factor for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [
3,
4], which are frequently associated with low HDL-C and high triglyceride (TG), insulin resistance, and abdominal obesity [
5,
6]. Exercise is a therapy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and overall mortality in a dose-dependent manner [
7,
8]. On the other hand, the optimal length of the treatment period and exercise intensity to achieve a desirable weight loss, normal blood pressure range, and improvement of serum lipid profile are still unclear depends on age and gen der .
The magnitude of the effects of exercise training on raising the HDL-C level was disappointing: 1.1 and 1.4 mg/dL elevation of HDL-C for men and women, respectively, from five months of aerobic exercise [
9]. Although the correlation between the increase in HDL-C and the exercise period and exercise intensity is unclear, the increase in HDL-C levels was unsatisfactory, ranging from 0.27 to 5.41 mg/dl from 23-meta analyses [
10]. In addition, the blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of exercise were also unsatisfactory, varying between systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). Aerobic and static exercise can reduce the SBP significantly, but not the DBP [
11,
12]. These results suggest that exercise alone cannot achieve sufficient treatment efficacy in lowering the BP and raising the HDL-C levels, despite effectively lowering the body weight, body fat, and serum triglyceride.
Although a combination of statin, either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin, and exercise therapy for 20 weeks raised the HDL-C significantly (from 46±14 mg/dL to 54±14 mg/dL), the combination therapy did not affect blood pressure [
13]. The use of statin has been closely associated with undesirable musculoskeletal damage, such as muscular pain, cramps, and stiffness [
14]. A combination of statin and high-intensity exercise (eccentric and strenuous exercises) caused muscle injury, whereas a combination with moderate exercise did not cause myopathy [
15]. On the other hand, many studies strongly suggest that statin-associated myopathy and myalgia were more exacerbated with an increase in exercise [
16], which have been the most common statin side effects [
17]. The myopathy and myalgia were more associated with the decrease in CoQ
10 by statin consumption and regular exercise [
18]. Therefore, increasing or preserving the CoQ
10 levels could be an indispensable strategy to treat dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis without adverse effects [
19].
In contrast, eight weeks, 12 weeks, or 24 weeks of Cuban policosanol supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in SBP and DBP and an increase in the HDL-C levels in prehypertensive subjects without exercise training [
20,
21,
22]. On the other hand, no study has compared the efficacy of treating hypertension and dyslipidemia by a combination of exercise and policosanol consumption in obese subjects. The correlation between the change in BP and HDL-C levels after combination therapy of high-intensity exercise and policosanol consumption in obese subjects needs to be determined.
A nationally representative study with the
Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showed that patients with metabolic syndrome had significantly higher levels of liver enzymes, a
spartate aminotransferase (AST), a
lanine transaminase (ALT), γ-
glutamyl transferase (GTP), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), than the control subjects [
23]. In addition, liver function enzymes, AST, ALT, and γ-GTP were usually elevated by high-intensity exercise, particularly in weight training, as an intense exercise-induced liver injury [
24]. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the change in the serum enzymes for liver damage and CoQ
10 level by a combination therapy of Cuban policosanol (20 mg/day) and high-intensity exercise in subjects with metabolic syndrome.
The current study was designed to compare the changes in blood pressure, lipid profile parameters, hepatic function parameters, and CoQ
10 levels in the serum after 12 weeks of Cuban policosanol consumption and high-intensity exercise. The changes in the qualities of lipoproteins VLDL, LDL, HDL
2, and HDL
3 were compared using composition analysis, extent of oxidation and glycation, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As a HDL functionality test, the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities were compared using zebrafish embryo survivability under the presence of carboxymethyllysine. The zebrafish embryos have well-developed innate and acquired immune systems like mammalian ones [
25]. An additional advantage of working with zebrafish embryos is external development and optical transparency during development. With these characteristics, zebrafish and their embryos are a valuable and popular animal model for various studies, including screening of antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents [
26].
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Policosanol
The Raydel
® policosanol tablets (20 mg) were obtained from Raydel Korea (Seoul, Korea), which was manufactured from Cuban policosanol at Raydel Australia (Thornleigh, Sydney, Australia). Cuban policosanol was defined as genuine policosanol with a specific ratio of each ingredient [
27]: 1-tetracosanol (C
24H
49OH, 0.1–20 mg/g); 1-hexacosanol (C
26H
53OH, 30.0–100.0 mg/g); 1-heptacosanol (C
27H
55OH, 1.0–30.0 mg/g); 1-octacosanol (C
28H
57OH, 600.0–700.0 mg/g); 1-nonacosanol (C
29H
59OH, 1.0–20.0 mg/g); 1-triacontanol (C
30H
61OH, 100.0–150.0); 1-dotriacontanol (C
32H
65OH, 50.0–100.0 mg/g); 1-tetratriacontanol (C
34H
69OH, 1.0–50.0 mg/g).
2.2. Participants
Young and middle-aged obese volunteers (BMI > 28 kg/m2) were recruited randomly through a nationwide newspaper advertisement between September 2022 and December 2022. After recruiting, 20 volunteers (30–51 years old, BMI=30.5±1.1) participated in a daily exercise program, which was at least 120 min with high-intensity exercise per session combined with aerobic exercise 60 min and weight training 60 min. All participants were advised to consume the 20 mg policosanol tablet with a daily record of ingestion time.
This study was approved by the Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy (KoNIBP, approval number P01-202109-31-009) by the Ministry of Health Care and Welfare (MOHW) of Korea. All completed participants were of Korean ethnicity (n=17, male=8 and female=9). They consumed typical Korean dietary pattern, which is enriched with rice-based carbohydrates (60.8%), total fat (24.2%), and proteins (15.1%), consisting of vegetables, meat, and fish, for 12 weeks without caloric restriction. None of the participants consumed vegan or kosher diets. The exercise frequency, spending time, and intensity were estimated from a self-administered questionnaire inquiring about the frequency, time, and intensity of exercise per week during 12 weeks. The metabolic equivalents (METs) were calculated using a shorthand method for estimating the energy expenditure during physical activity to compare the intensity values of specific activities [
28]. The METs score was calculated based on the survey results of the participants and were classified as follows: Light <3.0 METs; Moderate 3.0 ~ 6.0 METs; Vigorous >6.0 METs.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of participants.1.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of participants.1.
Groups |
Age |
BMI |
Total Exercise |
Strength Exercise |
Aerobic Exercise |
MET |
mean ± SEM |
mean ± SEM |
min/week |
min/week |
min/week |
Score |
Male (n=8) |
36.9 ± 1.9 |
31.0 ± 1.9 |
655.0 ± 97.4 |
285.7 ± 9.2 |
390.0 ± 102.7 |
7.0 ± 0.3 |
Female (n=9) |
38.4 ± 2.7 |
29.0 ± 1.4 |
714.4 ± 94.5 |
194.4 ± 30.6 |
520.0 ± 84.3 |
7.4 ± 0.1 |
Total (n=17) |
37.7 ± 1.6 |
30.1 ± 1.1 |
686.5 ± 66.1 |
234.4 ± 20.8 |
458.8 ± 65.7 |
7.2 ± 0.1 |
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) lack of will to complete the exercise program; (2) severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, respiratory, endocrinological, and metabolic disorder diseases; (3) allergies; (4) heavy drinkers, more than 30 g of alcohol per day; (5) taking medicine or functional food products including any statins and coenzyme Q10 supplements that may affect the lipid metabolism, including raising the HDL-C or lowering the LDL-C concentrations, and lowering the triglyceride concentration; (6) women in pregnancy, lactation, or planning to become pregnant during the study period; (7) people who had donated more than 200 mL of blood donation within one month or 400 mL of blood within three months before starting this clinical trial; (8) a person who participated in other clinical trial within the last three months or currently is participating in other clinical trial.
2.4. Exercise Program
After recruiting and selection, all participants (n=20) were split into four small groups (n=5) and had to join a mandatory exercise program from Monday to Saturday at a public fitness center. The program consisted of aerobic exercise for at least 30 min with high intensity and weight training for at least 30 min with high endurance under supervision by a professional health trainer per each group. During the 12-week program, three participants (2 male and 1 female) quit because of their busy schedules and omitting policosanol intake. Seventeen participants completed the daily consumption of policosanol and the exercise program.
2.5. Anthropometric Analysis
Licensed technicians at Health examination information of the Seoul Eastern Branch of the Korea Health Care Association (Seoul, Korea) measured all the anthropometric data and blood pressure data in
Table 2. The height, body weight, body fat, and muscle weight were measured individually using INBODY770 (Inbody Co., Seoul, Korea). The blood pressure was measured using a digital automatic blood pressure monitor TM-2655P (A&D Co., Tokyo, Japan).
2.6. Blood Analysis
Blood was donated voluntarily by the participants after 12 hours of fasting and collected according to the Helsinki guidelines approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy (KoNIBP, approval number P01-202109-31-009) supported by the Ministry of Health Care and Welfare (MOHW) of Korea. After overnight fasting, blood was collected using a vacutainer (BD Bio Sciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) without adding an anticoagulant. The serum lipid profiles in
Table 3 and protein parameters in
Table 4 were determined using an automatic analyzer (Cobas C502 chemistry analyzer, Roche, Germany) at a commercially available diagnostic service via SCL Healthcare (Seoul, Korea).
2.7. Quantification of Serum Coenzyme Q10
The concentration of CoQ10 in serum was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit with CUSABIO human CoQ10 ELİSA kit (Cat# CSB-E14081h, Cusabio Biotechnology Inc. Houston, TX, USA) in according to the manufacturer’s protocol with 100-fold diluted serum from individual subjects.
2.8. Isolation of Lipoproteins
Very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL, d<1.019 g/ml), LDL (1.019<d<1.063), HDL
2 (1.063<d<1.125), and HDL
3 (1.125<d<1.225) were isolated from the individual serum via sequential ultracentrifugation, as reported elsewhere [
29], with the density adjusted adding NaCl and NaBr in according to standard protocols [
30]. Briefly, each serum with the density adjusted was ultracentrifuged sequentially at 100,000
×g for 24 hr at 10 °C using a Himac NX (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a fixed angle rotor P50AT4-0124 at the Raydel Research Institute (Daegu, Korea). The separated lipoproteins were collected and processed individually for dialysis to remove any traces of NaBr against Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 10 mM Tris-HCl, 140 mM NaCl, and 5 mM ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) [pH 8.0]).
2.9. Characterization of Lipoproteins
Individual lipoproteins, VLDL, LDL, HDL
2, and HDL
3, were characterized to determine the lipid and protein composition, oxidation extent, and glycation extent. For each lipoprotein fraction purified individually, the total cholesterol (TC) and TG measurements were obtained using commercially available kits (cholesterol, T-CHO, and TG, Cleantech TS-S; Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan). The protein concentrations of the lipoproteins were determined using a Lowry protein assay, as modified by Markwell
et al. [
31] using a Folin & Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent (F9252, Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.
Under the same protein concentration in each lipoprotein, the degree of oxidation of the individual lipoproteins was assessed by measuring the concentration of oxidized species according to the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) method using malondialdehyde (MDA) as a standard [
32]. The extent of glycation of individual lipoprotein was determined by measuring the fluorometric intensity at 370 nm (excitation) and 440 nm (emission) under the same protein concentration, as described previously [
33], using an FL6500 spectrofluorometer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA), and a 1 cm path-length suprasil quartz cuvette (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA, USA).
The expression of apolipoproteins in HDL2 (2 mg of protein/mL) and HDL3 (2 mg of protein /mL) were compared using 15% SDS-PAGE under denatured state with β-mercaptoethanol addition. The protein bands were visualized by 0.125% Coomassie Brilliant Blue, after which the relative band intensities between weeks 0 and 12 were compared by band scanning using Gel Doc® XR (Bio-Rad) with Quantity One software (version 4.5.2).
2.10. Electron Microscopy
TEM (Hitachi H-7800; Ibaraki, Japan) at Raydel Research Institute (Daegu, Korea) was performed at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV. Each lipoprotein was stained negatively with 1% sodium phosphotungstate (PTA; pH 7.4) with a final apolipoprotein concentration of 0.3 mg/mL in TBS. Five μL of the lipoprotein suspension was blotted with filter paper and replaced immediately with a 5 μL droplet of 1% PTA. After a few seconds, the stained HDL fraction was blotted onto a Formvar carbon-coated 300 mesh copper grid and air-dried. The shape and size of each lipoprotein were determined by TEM at 40,000× magnification, using EMIP-EX software, Ver. 07.13 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), according to a previous report [
29].
2.11. Agarose Electrophoresis
The electromobility of the participants’ samples was compared by evaluating the migration of each lipoprotein (LDL, HDL
2, and HDL
3) by agarose electrophoresis [
34]. The relative electrophoretic mobility depends on the intact charge and three-dimensional structure of LDL and HDL. More oxidized LDL migrated faster towards the bottom of the gel due to apo-B fragmentation and increased the negative charge. The gels were dried and stained with 0.125% Coomassie Brilliant Blue, after which the relative band intensities were compared by band scanning using Gel Doc® XR (Bio-Rad) with Quantity One software (version 4.5.2).
2.12. Antioxidant Activities in the HDL
The paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) activity toward paraoxon was determined by evaluating the hydrolysis of paraoxon to
p-nitrophenol and diethylphosphate catalyzed by the enzyme [
35]. Equally diluted rHDL (20 μL, 1 mg/mL) was added to 180 μL of paraoxon-ethyl (Sigma Cat. No. D-9286) containing the buffer solution (90 mM Tris-HCl/3.6 mM NaCl/2 mM CaCl
2 [pH 8.5]). The PON-1 activity was then determined by measuring the initial velocity of
p-nitrophenol production at 37°C, as determined by the absorbance at 415 nm (microplate reader, Bio-Rad model 680; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The ferric ion-reducing ability (FRA) was determined using the method reported by Benzie and Strain [
36]. Briefly, the FRA reagents were freshly prepared by mixing 20 mL of 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 2.5 mL of 10 mM 2,4,6-tripyridyl-S-triazine (Fluka Chemicals, Buchs, Switzerland) and 2.5 mL of 20 mM FeCl3∙6H2O. The antioxidant activities of each HDL were estimated by measuring the increase in absorbance induced by the ferrous ions generated. Freshly prepared FRA reagent (300 μL) was mixed with each HDL (100 μg of protein in 1 mL) as an antioxidant source. The FRA was determined by measuring the absorbance at 593 nm every two min during the 60 min period at 25 °C using a UV-2600i spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with Labsolutions software UV-Vis 1.11 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
2.13. Zebrafish Maintenance
Zebrafish and their embryos were maintained using standard protocols [
37] and in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [
38]. All zebrafish-related procedures and maintenance were approved by the Committee of Animal Care and Use of Raydel Research Institute (approval code RRI-20-003, Daegu, Republic of Korea). The zebrafish were housed in a temperature-controlled system tank at 28 °C and subjected to a 10:14 hour light cycle. The fish were fed a regular diet of tetrabit granules (TetrabitGmbh D49304, containing 47.5% crude protein, 6.5% crude fat, 2.0% crude fiber, and 10.5% crude ash) supplemented with vitamin A (29,770 IU/kg), vitamin D3 (1860 IU/kg), vitamin E (200 mg/kg), and vitamin C (137 mg/kg) from Melle, Germany.
2.14. Microinjection of CML and HDL into Zebrafish Embryos
One day post-fertilization (dpf), zebrafish embryos were microinjected individually using a pneumatic picopump (PV830; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA) equipped with a magnetic manipulator (MM33; Kantec, Bensenville, IL, USA) and a pulled with a microcapillary pipette-using device (PC-10; Narishigen, Tokyo, Japan). An injection of each HDL
3 (10 ng of protein) or co-injection with CML (500 ng) was performed at the same location in the yolk to minimize bias using a previously described method [
39]. After the injection, the live embryos were observed under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi 305, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographed at 20× magnification using a ZEISS Axiocam 208 color (Jena, Germany). The chorion was removed 24 hours post-injection, and each live embryo was compared to assess the developmental stage at a higher magnification of 50×.
2.15. Imaging of Oxidative Stress, Apoptosis in Embryo
After injecting CML with each rHDL, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and the extent of cellular apoptosis in the embryos were imaged by dihydroethidium (DHE) staining and acridine orange (AO) staining, respectively, as described elsewhere [
40]. Images of the ROS were obtained by fluorescence observations (Ex=585 nm and Em=615 nm), as described previously [
41]. The extent of cellular apoptosis among the groups was compared using acridine orange (AO) staining and fluorescence observations (Ex = 505 nm, Em = 535 nm), as reported elsewhere [
42] using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000 microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
2.16. Statistical Analysis
The findings are reported as the mean ± SEM, derived from at least three independent experiments with duplicate samples. A paired t-test was used to assess the statistical significance between the baseline and follow-up values within the groups. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to identify the positive or negative associations between the serum level of CoQ10 and the lipid profile and blood pressure. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS software package version 29.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
4. Discussion
This study examined the combined effects of Cuban policosanol consumption and high-intensity exercise for 12 weeks regarding the change in blood pressure, BMI, serum lipid profile, and lipoprotein qualities and functionalities. Despite the conflicting data depending on age and gender, a meta-analysis with middle-aged and older adults, 45-64 years old, showed that aerobic and static exercise had a significant effect on improving only the SBP around mean difference (MD) −9.254 and −10.465, respectively [
11]. In contrast, aerobic and static exercise did not cause a significant reduction of the DBP [
11]. In addition, a systematic review of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged women showed that 12–24 weeks of exercise resulted in −0.57 kg, −0.43 kg/m
2, −4.89 mmHg, and −2.71 mmHg change in body weight, BMI, SBP, and DBP, respectively [
43]. Overall, these results suggest that exercise therapy alone, regardless of aerobic and anaerobic, did not reduce the DBP significantly.
On the other hand, twelve weeks of policosanol consumption (20 mg) without exercise resulted in a decrease in SBP and DBP, −10.5 mmHg (−7.7% compared to the baseline) and −6.2 mmHg (−7.1% compared to the baseline), respectively, in Korean prehypertensive subjects [
20]. A randomized trial with 12 weeks of policosanol consumption of normotensive Japanese participants also showed −7.9 mmHg (−9.5% compared to the baseline) and −2.8 mmHg (−4.0% compared to the baseline) of SBP and DBP, respectively [
44]. Meta-analysis with 19 studies showed that policosanol consumption resulted in a larger decrease in the SBP (−3.423 mmHg) than the DBP (−1.468 mmHg) [
45]. These results suggest that policosanol consumption was more likely to decrease the SBP than DBP because exercise alone resulted in only a significant decrease in SBP. In the current results, however, a combination of Cuban policosanol consumption and exercise resulted in a more dramatic decrease in DBP (−10.6 mmHg) (
p= 0.007, −12.8% from baseline), whereas the decrease in SBP was approximately −9.8 mmHg (
p=0.046, −7.7% compared to the baseline). In particular, the male participants showed a 3.2-fold larger decrease in DBP (−16.7 mmHg, −19.4% compared to the baseline) than that of female participants (−5.1 mmHg, −6.4% from the baseline), as shown in
Table 2. These results strongly suggest that there might be a synergistic effect in a combination of policosanol consumption and exercise to result in a remarkable decrease in SBP and DBP.
The effects of exercise for 12 months on weight loss was an approximate 0–3% decrease from the baseline by aerobic and resistance training [
46]. On the other hand, the current results showed a −12.5% body weight loss after 12 weeks of exercise and policosanol consumption without calorie restriction. Although a sedentary lifestyle is frequently linked with low HDL-C and high TG in obese subjects, whether exercise can elevate HDL-C quantity or improve HDL quality remains to be established. High-intensity exercise is associated with decreased body weight, BMI, total fat mass, and serum TG. Nevertheless, it is unclear if exercise can elevate the serum HDL-C. Exercise training has little effect on elevating the HDL-C levels in men with initially low HDL-C (<35 mg/dL) [
47]. On the other hand, a meta-analysis with 25 articles showed that aerobic exercise modestly increases the HDL-C level; approximately 2.5 mg/dL of HDL-C was increased by at least 900 kcal of energy expenditure or 120 min exercise per week [
48]. These results revealed a significant increase in HDL-C/TC (%)and a remarkable decrease in TC, LDL-C, and TG/HDL-C, suggesting a synergistic effect of daily consumption of Cuban policosanol (20 mg) and exercise (
Table 3). The TG content in HDL
2 was diminished, and the TC content in HDL
3 was increased with the elevation of apoA-I in HDL
2 and HDL
3 at week 12.
The serum CoQ
10 level was decreased by up to 40–50% by statin consumption due to the fundamental blocking of cholesterol biosynthesis through the inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase [
49]. The depletion of CoQ
10 was directly associated with statin-induced myopathy via mitochondrial dysfunction [
50]. On the other hand, the current study showed that the 12 weeks of policosanol consumption did not interfere with the CoQ
10 metabolism and homeostasis ( approximately 370–513 ng/mL in serum), with a remarkable increase in CoQ
10/LDL-C ratio (
Figure 2A and
Table 3), whereas the CoQ
10/HDL-C ratio was not changed. These results suggest that although the LDL-C was decreased by 20% at week 12, the CoQ
10 level was maintained sufficiently in the serum. Moreover, male participants showed a 38% increase in the serum CoQ
10 level at week 12. The larger increase in serum HDL-C was correlated with the higher increase in serum CoQ
10 (
Figure 1B)
It was postulated that statin medication depleted serum CoQ
10 by blocking the synthesis of TC and LDL-C because LDL-C is a major carrier of CoQ
10 in human blood. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the current study is the first to show that Cuban policosanol (20 mg) consumption for 12 weeks did not impair the serum CoQ
10 metabolism despite remarkably lowering TC and LDL-C in the participants of both genders. Furthermore, the increase in serum CoQ
10 level was positively correlated with the increase in serum HDL-C (
Figure 2B) without inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase. On the other hand, the decrease in LDL-C by atorvastatin 80 mg for 16 weeks of consumption was linked directly with a decrease in serum CoQ
10 [
51]. A larger portion of CoQ
10 was carried by LDL (~58%) than by HDL (~26%) [
52]
. The current results show that the elevation of HDL-C by Cuban policosanol can be a strategy to maintain or elevate serum CoQ
10 level because
there has been no study to investigate an association between the increase in serum HDL-C and change in serum CoQ
10. Further study will be needed to elucidate the association with CoQ
10 in HDL subfractions to find the major carrier of CoQ
10, either HDL
2 or HDL
3, upon the changes in cholesterol contents.
Liver function enzymes, AST, ALT, and γ-GTP, were usually elevated by high-intensity exercise, particularly in weight training as an exercise-induced liver injury and
rhabdomyolysis [
24,
53]. On the other hand, the current results showed that γ-GTP was decreased significantly after 12 weeks, while AST and ALT were also decreased, even though they showed no significance (
Table 4). These results suggest that policosanol consumption could ameliorate liver damage against exercise-induced liver injury in obese subjects. Moreover, the extent of oxidation (MDA levels) in VLDL and LDL decreased significantly (approximately −44% and −22%, respectively) (
Table 5), whereas the antioxidant abilities in HDL
2 and HDL
3 were also elevated. All lipoprotein fractions, VLDL, LDL, HDL
2, and HDL
3, exhibited a reduction of glycation extent of approximately −42%, −16%, −18%, and −16%, respectively, at week 12 compared to the baseline. Similarly, an ELSA-Brasil population study showed that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was associated with the elevation of the serum advanced glycation end products, as well as an increase in the serum TG, ALT, γ-GTP, and glycated hemoglobin with a decrease in HDL-C [
54]. These results showed good agreement with a previous clinical study of Cuban policosanol (20 mg) consumption for 12 weeks, significant improvement of the liver functions and antioxidant abilities with a decrease in the serum AST, ALT, ALP, and γ-GTP levels in healthy Japanese middle-aged participants, as well as a decrease in the oxidation and glycation in VLDL and LDL [
44,
55].
Figure 1.
Comparison of the serum coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) level at week 12 from the baseline (week 0). .A:Quantification of CoQ10 in 100-fold diluted serum from each participant using Cusabio human CoQ10 ELİSA kit. *, p<0.05 versus week 0; ns, not significant. B:Spearman correlation analysis with the net change in HDL-C (ΔHDL-C) and net change in CoQ10 (ΔCoQ10) between weeks 0 and 12.
Figure 1.
Comparison of the serum coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) level at week 12 from the baseline (week 0). .A:Quantification of CoQ10 in 100-fold diluted serum from each participant using Cusabio human CoQ10 ELİSA kit. *, p<0.05 versus week 0; ns, not significant. B:Spearman correlation analysis with the net change in HDL-C (ΔHDL-C) and net change in CoQ10 (ΔCoQ10) between weeks 0 and 12.
Figure 2.
Comparison of the electromobility and oxidation extent in LDL between weeks 0 and 12.A: Electrophoresis under the nondenatured state on 0.5% agarose gel 120 mm length × 60 mm width × 5 mm thickness. Electrophoresis was carried out with 50 V for 1 h in tris-acetate-ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid buffer (pH 8.0). The apo-B in LDL was visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining (final 1.25%). The yellow font indicates the band intensity compared to the 100% initialized band intensity of week 0. Oxidized LDL, cupric ion (final 1 μM) treated for 4 hr. The red arrowhead indicates an aggregated oxLDL band at the loading position. The blue triangle indicates the smeared and disappeared oxLDL band range. M1, M2, F1, and F2 are representative band image of the participants. M, male; F, female.B: Quantification of the oxidized LDL contents by a thiobarbituric acid reactive substance assay using a malondialdehyde (MDA) standard. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments with duplicate samples. The oxidation extent in each group between weeks 0 and 12 was compared using a paired t-test.
Figure 2.
Comparison of the electromobility and oxidation extent in LDL between weeks 0 and 12.A: Electrophoresis under the nondenatured state on 0.5% agarose gel 120 mm length × 60 mm width × 5 mm thickness. Electrophoresis was carried out with 50 V for 1 h in tris-acetate-ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid buffer (pH 8.0). The apo-B in LDL was visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining (final 1.25%). The yellow font indicates the band intensity compared to the 100% initialized band intensity of week 0. Oxidized LDL, cupric ion (final 1 μM) treated for 4 hr. The red arrowhead indicates an aggregated oxLDL band at the loading position. The blue triangle indicates the smeared and disappeared oxLDL band range. M1, M2, F1, and F2 are representative band image of the participants. M, male; F, female.B: Quantification of the oxidized LDL contents by a thiobarbituric acid reactive substance assay using a malondialdehyde (MDA) standard. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments with duplicate samples. The oxidation extent in each group between weeks 0 and 12 was compared using a paired t-test.
Figure 3.
Transmitted electron microscopy (TEM) image analysis of lipoproteins, VLDL, LDL, HDL2, and HDL3 and size analysis between weeks 0 and 12. Representative image of VLDL, LDL, HDL2, and HDL3 from the same individual between weeks 0 and 12 with magnification 40,000×. One graduation of the scale bar indicates 20 nm. The red arrowhead indicates aggregated lipoprotein particles. A: Comparison of the VLDL particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. ns, not significant versus week 0. B: Comparison of the LDL particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. ns, not significant versus week 0. C: Comparison of the HDL2 particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. *, p<0.05 versus week 0. D: Comparison of the HDL3 particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. ns, not significant versus week 0.
Figure 3.
Transmitted electron microscopy (TEM) image analysis of lipoproteins, VLDL, LDL, HDL2, and HDL3 and size analysis between weeks 0 and 12. Representative image of VLDL, LDL, HDL2, and HDL3 from the same individual between weeks 0 and 12 with magnification 40,000×. One graduation of the scale bar indicates 20 nm. The red arrowhead indicates aggregated lipoprotein particles. A: Comparison of the VLDL particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. ns, not significant versus week 0. B: Comparison of the LDL particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. ns, not significant versus week 0. C: Comparison of the HDL2 particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. *, p<0.05 versus week 0. D: Comparison of the HDL3 particle size in each group between weeks 0 and 12 using a paired t-test. ns, not significant versus week 0.
Figure 4.
Representative image of the apoA-I expression pattern in HDL2 (A) and HDL3 (B) between weeks 0 and 12 in the male group. M1, M2, M3, and M4 is male participant 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, as a representative image. The yellow font indicates the band intensity of apoA-I compared to week 0. The red arrowhead indicates a smeared band intensity with a shifted up band position of apoA-I because of glycation at week 0. .
Figure 4.
Representative image of the apoA-I expression pattern in HDL2 (A) and HDL3 (B) between weeks 0 and 12 in the male group. M1, M2, M3, and M4 is male participant 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, as a representative image. The yellow font indicates the band intensity of apoA-I compared to week 0. The red arrowhead indicates a smeared band intensity with a shifted up band position of apoA-I because of glycation at week 0. .
Figure 5.
Determination of paraoxonase (PON)-1 activity and ferric ion reduction ability (FRA) in HDL2 and HDL3 at week 0 and week 12. *, p<0.05 versus week 0; **, p<0.01 versus week 0; ***, p<0.001 versus week 0. A: Comparison of HDL2-associated PON-1 activity at weeks 0 and 12 B: Comparison of HDL3-associated PON-1 activity at weeks 0 and 12 C: Comparison of HDL2-associated FRA activity at weeks 0 and 12 D: Comparison of HDL3-associated FRA activity at weeks 0 and 12.
Figure 5.
Determination of paraoxonase (PON)-1 activity and ferric ion reduction ability (FRA) in HDL2 and HDL3 at week 0 and week 12. *, p<0.05 versus week 0; **, p<0.01 versus week 0; ***, p<0.001 versus week 0. A: Comparison of HDL2-associated PON-1 activity at weeks 0 and 12 B: Comparison of HDL3-associated PON-1 activity at weeks 0 and 12 C: Comparison of HDL2-associated FRA activity at weeks 0 and 12 D: Comparison of HDL3-associated FRA activity at weeks 0 and 12.
Figure 6.
Comparison of the survivability, developmental speed and morphology, and extent of ROS production and cellular apoptosis after injection of HDL
3 from each group in the presence of carboxymethyllysine. A: Survivability of embryo during 24 hours post-injection. B: Morphological change in an embryo during development. Stereoimage observation at 5 hours and 24 hours post-injection, somite number at 24 hours post-injection, DHE-stained image at 5 hours post-injection, AO-stained image at 5 hours post-injection. C: Quantification of ROS production and extent of cellular apoptosis from DHE staining and AO staining using Image J software (
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/, accessed on 16 May 2023). The data are expressed as the mean±SD from three independent experiments.
Figure 6.
Comparison of the survivability, developmental speed and morphology, and extent of ROS production and cellular apoptosis after injection of HDL
3 from each group in the presence of carboxymethyllysine. A: Survivability of embryo during 24 hours post-injection. B: Morphological change in an embryo during development. Stereoimage observation at 5 hours and 24 hours post-injection, somite number at 24 hours post-injection, DHE-stained image at 5 hours post-injection, AO-stained image at 5 hours post-injection. C: Quantification of ROS production and extent of cellular apoptosis from DHE staining and AO staining using Image J software (
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/, accessed on 16 May 2023). The data are expressed as the mean±SD from three independent experiments.
Table 2.
Change of anthropometric profiles between week 0 and week 12.
Table 2.
Change of anthropometric profiles between week 0 and week 12.
|
Groups |
Week 0 |
Week 12 |
Δ Change (%) |
p†
|
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
SBP (mmHg) |
Male (n=8) |
133.8 ± 6.8 |
119.1 ± 5.2 |
–10.9 |
0.109 |
Female (n=9) |
122.8 ± 2.8 |
117.2 ± 3.5 |
–4.5 |
0.233 |
Total (n=17) |
127.9 ± 3.7 |
118.1 ± 3.0 |
–7.7 |
0.046 |
DBP (mmHg) |
Male (n=8) |
85.8 ± 5.2 |
69.1 ± 3.9 |
–19.4 |
0.022 |
Female (n=9) |
79.3 ± 2.1 |
74.2 ± 3.0 |
–6.4 |
0.180 |
Total (n=17) |
82.4 ± 2.7 |
71.8 ± 2.4 |
–12.8 |
0.007 |
BMI (kg/m²) |
Male (n=8) |
31.0 ± 1.9 |
25.0 ± 2.7 |
–19.3 |
0.092 |
Female (n=9) |
29.0 ± 1.4 |
26.0 ± 1.4 |
–10.5 |
0.146 |
Total (n=17) |
30.0 ± 1.1 |
25.5 ± 1.4 |
–14.8 |
0.022 |
Weight (kg) |
Male (n=8) |
99.9 ± 6.4 |
85.2 ± 5.5 |
–14.7 |
0.104 |
Female (n=9) |
79.0 ± 4.1 |
71.0 ± 4.2 |
–10.2 |
0.190 |
Total (n=17) |
88.8 ± 4.4 |
77.7 ± 3.7 |
–12.5 |
0.064 |
Waist circumference (cm) |
Male (n=7) |
108.3 ± 3.8 |
89.7 ± 4.6 |
–17.2 |
0.009 |
Female (n=9) |
95.8 ± 3.7 |
87.4 ± 4.9 |
–8.8 |
0.193 |
Total (n=16) |
101.2 ± 3.1 |
88.4 ± 3.3 |
–12.7 |
0.008 |
Muscle mass (kg) |
Male (n=8) |
65.3 ± 3.2 |
64.1 ± 2.8 |
–1.8 |
0.786 |
Female (n=9) |
45.2 ± 1.4 |
44.2 ± 1.4 |
–2.2 |
0.625 |
Total (n=17) |
54.6 ± 3.0 |
53.6 ± 2.9 |
–2.0 |
0.797 |
Total fat mass (kg) |
Male (n=8) |
30.6 ± 3.4 |
17.1 ± 3.4 |
–44.0 |
0.014 |
Female (n=9) |
31.0 ± 3.4 |
24.0 ± 3.4 |
–22.6 |
0.163 |
Total (n=17) |
30.8 ± 2.3 |
20.8 ± 2.5 |
–32.6 |
0.006 |
Subcutaneous fat mass (kg) |
Male (n=8) |
28.9 ± 3.4 |
15.8 ± 3.4 |
–45.4 |
0.017 |
Female (n=9) |
29.7 ± 3.3 |
22.9 ± 3.3 |
–23.1 |
0.162 |
Total (n=17) |
29.3 ± 2.3 |
19.5 ± 2.5 |
–33.4 |
0.007 |
Visceral fat mass (kg) |
Male (n=8) |
1.7 ± 0.2 |
1.4 ± 0.2 |
–20.4 |
0.229 |
Female (n=9) |
1.3 ± 0.1 |
1.2 ± 0.1 |
–11.8 |
0.200 |
Total (n=17) |
1.5 ± 0.1 |
1.3 ± 0.1 |
–16.4 |
0.109 |
Body fat percentage (%) |
Male (n=8) |
30.1 ± 1.6 |
19.2 ± 2.8 |
–36.3 |
0.005 |
Female (n=9) |
38.4 ± 2.8 |
32.7 ± 3.1 |
–14.9 |
0.189 |
Total (n=17) |
34.5 ± 1.9 |
26.3 ± 2.7 |
–23.7 |
0.018 |
Body water content (kg) |
Male (n=8) |
50.8 ± 2.5 |
50.0 ± 2.2 |
–1.6– |
0.803 |
Female (n=9) |
35.2 ± 1.1 |
34.4 ± 1.1 |
–2.2 |
0.626 |
Total (n=17) |
42.5 ± 2.3 |
41.7 ± 2.2 |
–1.9 |
0.806 |
Table 3.
Change in the serum lipid parameters and coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) ratio between weeks 0 and 12.
Table 3.
Change in the serum lipid parameters and coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) ratio between weeks 0 and 12.
|
Groups |
Week 0 |
Week 12 |
ΔChange (%) |
p†
|
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
TC (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
267.7 ± 24.2 |
211.2 ± 12.5 |
–21.1 |
0.056 |
Female (n=9) |
221.4 ± 8.2 |
195.3 ± 15.3 |
–11.8 |
0.152 |
Total (n=17) |
243.2 ± 13.1 |
202.8 ± 9.9 |
–16.6 |
0.019 |
TG (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
191.4 ± 34.8 |
84.1 ± 17.4 |
–56.1 |
0.015 |
Female (n=9) |
102.2 ± 9.5 |
52.4 ± 6.5 |
–48.7 |
0.001 |
Total (n=17) |
144.2 ± 19.9 |
67.3 ± 9.4 |
–53.3 |
0.002 |
RC (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
36.2 ± 7.7 |
16.2 ± 3.4 |
–55.4 |
0.032 |
Female (n=9) |
20.5 ± 1.9 |
12.7 ± 2.2 |
–38.0 |
0.017 |
Total (n=17) |
27.9 ± 4.1 |
14.3. ± 2.0 |
–48.6 |
0.007 |
HDL-C (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
43.8 ± 3.1 |
54.3 ± 4.7 |
23.9 |
0.084 |
Female (n=9) |
56.3 ± 3.5 |
58.8 ± 5.9 |
4.4 |
0.721 |
Total (n=17) |
50.4 ± 2.8 |
56.6 ± 3.7 |
12.4 |
0.189 |
HDL-C/TC (%) |
Male (n=8) |
17.1 ± 1.7 |
26.2 ± 2.4 |
53.2 |
0.008 |
Female (n=9) |
25.7 ± 1.9 |
30.5 ± 2.3 |
18.6 |
0.126 |
Total (n=17) |
21.6 ± 1.6 |
28.5 ± 1.7 |
31.5 |
0.007 |
TG/HDL-C (ratio) |
Male (n=8) |
4.7 ± 0.9 |
1.7 ± 0.4 |
–63.2 |
0.014 |
Female (n=9) |
1.9 ± 0.2 |
1.0 ± 0.1 |
–48.6 |
0.005 |
Total (n=17) |
3.2 ± 0.5 |
1.3 ± 0.2 |
–58.6 |
0.005 |
LDL-C (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
188.0 ± 18.7 |
140.8 ± 10.3 |
–25.1 |
0.044 |
Female (n=9) |
144.6 ± 8.3 |
123.7 ± 11.7 |
–14.5 |
0.164 |
Total (n=17) |
165.0 ± 10.9 |
131.7 ± 7.9 |
–20.2 |
0.019 |
LDL-C/HDL-C(ratio) |
Male (n=8) |
4.5 ± 0.6 |
2.8 ± 0.4 |
–38.2 |
0.029 |
Female (n=9) |
2.7 ± 0.3 |
2.2 ± 0.2 |
–17.9 |
0.198 |
Total (n=17) |
3.5 ± 0.4 |
2.5 ± 0.2 |
–30.0 |
0.022 |
Serum CoQ10 (mol/L) |
Male (n=8) |
0.395 ± 0.032 |
0.547 ± 0.031 |
38.2 |
0.027 |
Female (n=9) |
0.551 ± 0.056 |
0.595 ± 0.05 |
7.9 |
0.566 |
Total (n=17) |
0.473 ± 0.035 |
0.571 ± 0.029 |
20.6 |
0.090 |
CoQ10/TC (mol/mol) |
Male (n=8) |
59.4 ± 7.3 |
102.5 ± 11.1 |
72.6 |
0.007 |
Female (n=9) |
99.5 ± 17.0 |
127.3 ± 20.9 |
27.9 |
0.323 |
Total (n=17) |
79.5 ± 10.5 |
114.9 ± 11.9 |
44.5 |
0.034 |
CoQ10/HDL-C (mol/mol) |
Male (n=8) |
369.7 ± 75.0 |
395.8 ± 39.7 |
7.1 |
0.764 |
Female (n=9) |
400.5 ± 92.2 |
415.5 ± 75.3 |
3.7 |
0.902 |
Total (n=17) |
385.1 ± 57.3 |
405.6 ± 41.0 |
5.3 |
0.773 |
CoQ10/LDL-C (mol/mol) |
Male (n=8) |
85.9 ± 12.5 |
156.3 ± 19.4 |
82.0 |
0.010 |
Female (n=9) |
155.1 ± 25.1 |
207.5 ± 34.2 |
33.8 |
0.240 |
Total (n=17) |
120.5 ± 16.6 |
181.9 ± 20.2 |
51.0 |
0.026 |
Table 4.
Change in the serum protein parameters between weeks 0 and 12.
Table 4.
Change in the serum protein parameters between weeks 0 and 12.
|
Groups |
Week 0 |
Week 12 |
Δ Change (%) |
p†
|
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
AST (IU/L) |
Male (n=8) |
33.5 ± 5.1 |
27.5 ± 2.2 |
–17.9 |
0.306 |
Female (n=9) |
23.7 ± 2.8 |
27.4 ± 2.8 |
16.0 |
0.352 |
Total (n=17) |
28.3 ± 3.0 |
27.5 ± 1.7 |
–2.9 |
0.813 |
ALT (IU/L) |
Male (n=8) |
37.8 ± 6.4 |
25.3 ± 2.8 |
–33.1 |
0.103 |
Female (n=9) |
29.2 ± 8.3 |
28.6 ± 7.0 |
–2.3 |
0.952 |
Total (n=17) |
33.2 ± 5.3 |
27.0 ± 3.8 |
–18.8 |
0.346 |
γ-GTP (IU/L) |
Male (n=8) |
48.0 ± 11.6 |
19.9 ± 2.4 |
–58.6 |
0.046 |
Female (n=9) |
30.4 ± 6.9 |
15.6 ± 1.7 |
–48.9 |
0.065 |
Total (n=17) |
38.7 ± 6.7 |
17.6 ± 1.5 |
–54.6 |
0.007 |
hsCRP (mg/L) |
Male (n=8) |
2.7 ± 1.1 |
3.4 ± 2.3 |
28.5 |
0.772 |
Female (n=9) |
2.0 ± 0.5 |
2.0 ± 0.7 |
–0.6 |
0.989 |
Total (n=17) |
2.3 ± 0.6 |
2.7 ± 1.1 |
15.2 |
0.781 |
apoA-I (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
144.5 ± 13.6 |
132.6 ± 8.7 |
–8.2 |
0.473 |
Female (n=9) |
140.9 ± 7.8 |
154.8 ± 10.4 |
9.9 |
0.303 |
Total (n=17) |
142.6 ± 7.4 |
144.4 ± 7.2 |
1.2 |
0.865 |
apo-B (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
140.8 ± 16.9 |
105.0 ± 7.2 |
–25.4 |
0.072 |
Female (n=9) |
89.9 ± 6.3 |
95.1 ± 7.3 |
5.8 |
0.596 |
Total (n=17) |
113.8 ± 10.5 |
99.8 ± 5.1 |
–12.4 |
0.237 |
apo-B/apoA-I |
Male (n=8) |
1.0 ± 0.1 |
0.8 ± 0.1 |
–19.9 |
0.195 |
Female (n=9) |
0.7 ± 0.1 |
0.6 ± 0.1 |
–4.6 |
0.793 |
Total (n=17) |
0.8 ± 0.1 |
0.7 ± 0.0 |
–13.4 |
0.277 |
Glucose (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
105.1 ± 5.7 |
97.3 ± 5.0 |
–7.5 |
0.320 |
Female (n=9) |
90.3 ± 3.7 |
89.2 ± 4.4 |
–1.2 |
0.849 |
Total (n=17) |
97.3 ± 3.7 |
93.0 ± 3.4 |
–4.4 |
0.398 |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
Male (n=8) |
1.1 ± 0.0 |
1.1 ± 0.1 |
–3.0 |
0.619 |
Female (n=9) |
1.0 ± 0.1 |
1.0 ± 0.0 |
–2.2 |
0.804 |
Total (n=17) |
1.1 ± 0.0 |
1.0 ± 0.0 |
–2.6 |
0.627 |
e-GRF (mL/min/1.73m²) |
Male (n=8) |
76.7 ± 2.9 |
80.0 ± 3.8 |
4.3 |
0.505 |
Female (n=9) |
72.6 ± 4.2 |
70.1 ± 4.3 |
–3.4 |
0.689 |
Total (n=17) |
74.4 ± 2.7 |
74.4 ± 3.1 |
0.1 |
0.988 |
Table 5.
Lipid compositions and extent of VLDL and LDL between weeks 0 and 12.
Table 5.
Lipid compositions and extent of VLDL and LDL between weeks 0 and 12.
|
|
Groups |
Week 0 |
Week 12 |
ΔChange (%) |
p†
|
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
VLDL |
FI (Glycated) |
Male (n=8) |
7131 ± 910 |
4431 ± 374 |
–37.9 |
0.052 |
Female (n=9) |
9311 ± 2943 |
5085 ± 782 |
–45.4 |
0.214 |
All (n=17) |
8221 ± 1484 |
4758 ± 420 |
–42.1 |
0.041 |
MDA (μM) |
Male (n=8) |
27.1 ± 4.8 |
15.0 ± 1.9 |
–44.6 |
0.080 |
Female (n=9) |
18.0 ± 6.5 |
10.4 ± 3.4 |
–42.4 |
0.339 |
All (n=17) |
22.6 ± 4.1 |
12.7 ± 2.0 |
–43.7 |
0.050 |
Diameter (nm) |
Male (n=8) |
37.6 ± 0.4 |
39.4 ± 2.8 |
4.8 |
0.588 |
Female (n=9) |
38.8 ± 1.0 |
38.5 ± 2.6 |
–0.8 |
0.918 |
Total (n=17) |
38.1 ± 0.5 |
38.9 ± 1.7 |
2.2 |
0.659 |
TC (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
59.3 ± 10.1 |
53.1 ± 4.5 |
–10.5 |
0.582 |
Female (n=9) |
66.6 ± 7.3 |
41.2 ± 3.4 |
–38.2 |
0.009 |
Total (n=17) |
63.2 ± 6.0 |
46.8 ± 3.1 |
–26.0 |
0.023 |
TG (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
120.6 ± 19.4 |
74.0 ± 15.3 |
–38.6 |
0.081 |
Female (n=9) |
131.4 ± 16.4 |
68.4 ± 10.8 |
–47.9 |
0.006 |
Total (n=17) |
126.3 ± 12.3 |
71.0 ± 8.9 |
–43.7 |
0.001 |
LDL |
FI (Glycated) |
Male (n=8) |
5009 ± 241 |
4358 ± 143 |
–13.0 |
0.040 |
Female (n=9) |
4907 ± 248 |
4138 ± 165 |
–15.7 |
0.020 |
Total (n=17) |
4955 ± 168 |
4242 ± 110 |
–14.4 |
0.001 |
MDA (μM) |
Male (n=8) |
4.5 ± 0.1 |
3.0 ± 0.3 |
–32.7 |
0.019 |
Female (n=9) |
3.7 ± 0.4 |
3.4 ± 0.3 |
–9.1 |
0.494 |
All (n=17) |
4.1 ± 0.2 |
3.2 ± 0.2 |
–22.0 |
0.012 |
Diameter (nm) |
Male (n=8) |
25.8 ± 0.7 |
27.4 ± 0.4 |
5.9 |
0.091 |
Female (n=9) |
26.7 ± 0.8 |
25.8 ± 0.6 |
–3.5 |
0.367 |
Total (n=17) |
26.3 ± 0.5 |
26.5 ± 0.4 |
0.9 |
0.740 |
TC (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
139.8 ± 14.6 |
103.2 ± 5.0 |
–26.2 |
0.043 |
Female (n=9) |
150.1 ± 19.4 |
95.3 ± 4.7 |
–36.5 |
0.023 |
Total (n=17) |
145.3 ± 12.1 |
99.0 ± 3.5 |
–31.8 |
0.002 |
TG (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
20.6 ± 2.1 |
12.2 ± 1.3 |
–40.8 |
0.005 |
Female (n=9) |
19.7 ± 2.6 |
10.8 ± 1.7 |
–45.2 |
0.010 |
Total (n=17) |
20.1 ± 1.6 |
11.4 ± 1.1 |
–43.1 |
< 0.001 |
Table 6.
Parameters of the HDL quality and functionality. Glycation and oxidation extent, lipid compositions, paraoxonase activity, and ferric ion reduction ability in HDL particles between weeks 0 and 12.
Table 6.
Parameters of the HDL quality and functionality. Glycation and oxidation extent, lipid compositions, paraoxonase activity, and ferric ion reduction ability in HDL particles between weeks 0 and 12.
|
|
Groups |
Week 0 |
Week 12 |
Δ Change % |
p†
|
Mean ± SEM |
Mean ± SEM |
HDL₂ |
FI (Glycated) |
Male (n=8) |
2234 ± 213 |
1837 ± 180 |
–17.8 |
0.175 |
Female (n=9) |
1969 ± 166 |
1616 ± 153 |
–17.9 |
0.138 |
Total (n=17) |
2094 ± 133 |
1720 ± 117 |
–17.9 |
0.043 |
Diameter (nm) |
Male (n=8) |
12.8 ± 0.4 |
13.5 ± 0.2 |
5.6 |
0.112 |
Female (n=9) |
12.5 ± 0.3 |
13.2 ± 0.4 |
6.0 |
0.180 |
Total (n=17) |
12.6 ± 0.2 |
13.4 ± 0.2 |
5.8 |
0.038 |
TC (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
84.7 ± 12.5 |
67.2 ± 4.8 |
–20.6 |
0.225 |
Female (n=9) |
68.7 ± 7.7 |
69.7 ± 3.6 |
1.4 |
0.910 |
Total (n=17) |
76.2 ± 7.2 |
68.5 ± 2.9 |
–10.1 |
0.332 |
TG (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
14.9 ± 2.8 |
7.5 ± 1.2 |
–49.4 |
0.029 |
Female (n=9) |
9.8 ± 0.9 |
6.7 ± 1.0 |
–32.2 |
0.033 |
Total (n=17) |
12.2 ± 1.5 |
7.1 ± 0.8 |
–42.1 |
0.004 |
HDL₃ |
FI (Glycated) |
Male (n=8) |
1885 ± 208 |
1616 ± 159 |
–14.3 |
0.322 |
Female (n=9) |
1891 ± 241 |
1578 ± 136 |
–16.6 |
0.278 |
Total (n=17) |
1888 ± 156 |
1596 ± 101 |
–15.5 |
0.126 |
Diameter (nm) |
Male (n=8) |
9.8 ± 0.3 |
11.2 ± 0.4 |
14.7 |
0.012 |
Female (n=9) |
9.5 ± 0.3 |
10.4 ± 0.4 |
9.5 |
0.070 |
Total (n=17) |
9.6 ± 0.2 |
10.8 ± 0.3 |
12.0 |
0.002 |
TC (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
37.5 ± 1.3 |
50.0 ± 5.0 |
33.5 |
0.030 |
Female (n=9) |
40.5 ± 1.2 |
52.8 ± 6.7 |
30.5 |
0.107 |
Total (n=17) |
39.1 ± 0.9 |
51.5 ± 4.2 |
31.8 |
0.009 |
TG (μg/mg of protein) |
Male (n=8) |
6.6 ± 1.2 |
5.6 ± 0.7 |
–15.6 |
0.469 |
Female (n=9) |
4.8 ± 1.4 |
4.8 ± 0.7 |
–0.2 |
1.000 |
Total (n=17) |
5.7 ± 0.9 |
5.2 ± 0.5 |
–8.7 |
0.643 |