1. Introduction
MYB transcription factors, which are widespread in crops, play important roles in regulating plant signaling pathways in response to various stresses [
1,
2]. MYB domain repeats (R) in transcription factors are divided into the R1, R2, and R3 types based on amino acid sequence similarity [
3]. The R region comprises 51-52 conserved amino acid residues arranged in a helix-turn-helix (HTH) structure that includes 3 tryptophans or other hydrophobic residues, spaced 18 amino acids apart [
4]. MYB transcription factor classes are divided into the 1R-MYB, 2R-MYB (R2R3-MYB), 3R-MYB, and 4R-MYB classes [
5]. Functional studies have revealed that R2R3-MYB transcription factors function in a wide variety of plant responses, including stress tolerance, plant hormonal regulation, metabolism, development, and cell differentiation [
1,
3].
R2R3-MYB transcription factors in plants function in transcriptional regulation in response to diverse abiotic stresses, such as salt stress, drought, cold stress, abscisic acid (ABA) treatment, oxidative damage, and phosphate (inorganic phosphate; Pi) deficiency [
3,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10]. Overexpressing
OsMYB2 in rice (
Oryza sativa L.) enhanced plant tolerance to salt, cold, and drought stress [
6]. TaMYB31-B in hexaploid wheat (
Triticum aestivum L.) positively regulates plant responses to drought by regulating the expression of wax biosynthesis genes and drought-responsive genes [
7]. TcMYB29a in
Taxus chinensis is a transcriptional activator that functions in ABA-mediated signaling by binding to MYB-recognizing element (MRE) motifs in the promoters of taxol-biosynthesis-related genes [
8]. AtMYB30 in
Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) is involved in systemic reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling in response to high-light stress [
9]. The transcription factor TaMYB4-7D in
T. aestivum mediates Pi uptake and translocation under Pi-deficiency conditions by binding to four MBS motifs in the promoter region of
TaPHT1;9-4B [
10]. The interaction of PuMYB40 and PuWRKY75 in
Populus ussuriensis positively regulates adventitious root formation under low-Pi conditions [
11].
Rice contains 99 R2R3-MYB transcription factor genes, accounting for 52.1% of the 190 MYB genes [
12]. A few R2R3-MYB transcription factors in rice were recently shown to be associated with Pi-starvation responses. For instance, OsMYB2P-1 functions as a key Pi-dependent regulator of Pi-starvation signaling by controlling the expression of Pi transporter (PT) genes, such as
OsPT2,
OsPT6,
OsPT8, and
OsPT10 [
13]. OsMYB4P acts as a transcriptional activator of Pi-homeostasis-related genes to increase Pi acquisition in rice [
14]. Overexpressing
OsMYB4P strongly induced the expression of PT genes, including
OsPT1,
OsPT2,
OsPT4,
OsPT7, and
OsPT8, in shoots under Pi-deficiency conditions [
14]. OsMYB1 mediates root elongation in the Pi starvation responses and acts as an important regulator of both Pi-starvation signaling and gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthesis [
15]. Overexpressing
OsMYB5P enhanced plant tolerance of Pi deficiency by controlling the transcription of PT genes [
16].
Pi is an important macronutrient for plant growth and development and a component of various biological molecules such as nucleic acids, membrane lipids, and ATP [
17,
18]. These molecules function as essential regulators of Pi-starvation signaling and cellular mechanisms to systemically enhance Pi uptake, transport, and utilization [
19]. Pi-starvation signaling is mediated by the PHR-miR399-PHO2 molecular network [
17,
20,
21]. The rice
miRNA399 (
OsmiR399) family comprises 11 members (
OsmiR399a to
k) that are important regulators of Pi-starvation signaling [
17]. During exposure to Pi-deficiency stress, the expression of
OsmiR399s is widely induced, whereas the expression of their target gene
OsPHO2 ultimately decreases [
17,
21].
OsPHR1 and
OsPHR2, the homologs of Arabidopsis
PHR1, encode transcription factors that positively regulate the expression of
OsIPS1 [
20,
22].
OsIPS1 represses the activity of
OsmiR399s via a target mimicry mechanism [
20,
22]. In Pi-starvation signaling, the PHR-miR399-PHO2 systemic regulatory network influences the activity of two important Pi transporters, PHO1 and PT2, to help maintain Pi homeostasis [
23,
24]. In addition, the OsPHR2-OsmiR827-OsSPX regulatory network is associated with Pi-starvation signaling in rice [
20,
22].
OsmiR827 is highly expressed under Pi deficiency, which induces
OsmiR827 expression, thereby decreasing the expression of
OsSPX genes [
22].
Pi deficiency leads to changes in plant morphology, physiology, and biochemistry by decreasing the acquisition and utilization efficiency of Pi from the soil [
25,
26]. Although the functions of many R2R3-MYB transcription factors in plant responses to abiotic stress have been extensively investigated, more research is needed on their roles in Pi-deficiency responses. In this study, we characterized the functions of rice
OsMYB58 in PHR-miR399-PHO2-dependent Pi starvation signaling. Through physiological and biological analyses, we demonstrated that OsMYB58, which functions as a transcriptional repressor essential for
OsmiR399s expression, plays a key role in maintaining Pi homeostasis. Understanding the role of
OsMYB58 in PHR-miR399-PHO2-dependent mechanisms during Pi-starvation signaling will help enhance crop yields and growth in nutrient-poor soils.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.H.K. and D.B.; methodology, W.T.Y.; formal analysis, D.B., W.T.Y., S.H., H.J.K., S.M.; investigation, D.B., W.T.Y., S.H.; resources, K.H.J.; data curation, D.B., W.T.Y. S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, D.B. and W.T.Y.; writing—review and editing, D.H.K.; supervision, D.H.K..; project administration, D.H.K.; funding acquisition, D.H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Transcriptional expression of OsMYB58 in rice under nutrient deficiency conditions. The upper panels of each figure indicated that transcript levels of OsMYB58 were analyzed using the northern blot. The bottom graphs of each figure indicated that the relative values of band intensity were calculated by rRNA intensity. (a) Total RNA extracted from rice wild-type plants (Oryza sativa L. ‘Dongjin’) growing in various nutrient deficiency conditions. Rice were transferred to nitrogen (N-; 0.25 mM), phosphate (P-; 0.0125 mM), potassium (K-; 0.01 mM), or iron (Fe-; 0.01 mM)-deficient media and grown for 6 hours. (b) Total RNA extracted from shoots and roots of rice plants after 3 days of treatment to high Pi (P+; 0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (P-; 0.0125 mM KH2PO4). (c and d) Rice samples were treated to low Pi at different time points. Total RNA extracted from separate parts of shoot (c) and root (d) parts of harvested samples. The rRNA was a loading control.
Figure 1.
Transcriptional expression of OsMYB58 in rice under nutrient deficiency conditions. The upper panels of each figure indicated that transcript levels of OsMYB58 were analyzed using the northern blot. The bottom graphs of each figure indicated that the relative values of band intensity were calculated by rRNA intensity. (a) Total RNA extracted from rice wild-type plants (Oryza sativa L. ‘Dongjin’) growing in various nutrient deficiency conditions. Rice were transferred to nitrogen (N-; 0.25 mM), phosphate (P-; 0.0125 mM), potassium (K-; 0.01 mM), or iron (Fe-; 0.01 mM)-deficient media and grown for 6 hours. (b) Total RNA extracted from shoots and roots of rice plants after 3 days of treatment to high Pi (P+; 0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (P-; 0.0125 mM KH2PO4). (c and d) Rice samples were treated to low Pi at different time points. Total RNA extracted from separate parts of shoot (c) and root (d) parts of harvested samples. The rRNA was a loading control.
Figure 2.
Physiological analysis of OsMYB58 overexpressing Arabidopsis plants under low Pi conditions. (a) 4-day-old seedlings of Arabidopsis wild-type (Col-0) and OsMYB58 overexpressing plants (OsMYB58-AraOX) were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) for 7 days and then the photos were taken. Scale bar indicated the 1.8 cm. (b) Comparison of root architectures between Col-0 and OsMYB58-AraOX seedlings depicted in (a). Scale bar indicated the 1.8 cm. (c-f) After 7 days to high Pi or low Pi, physiological changes in shoot and root were analyzed by various methodological measurements, including shoot fresh weight (c), root fresh weight (d), primary root length (e), and the number of lateral roots (f). (g and h) Pi concentrations were measured in the shoot (g) and root (h) of Col-0 and OsMYB58-AraOX after treatment to high Pi or low Pi for 7 days. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with 10 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the Col-0 (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 2.
Physiological analysis of OsMYB58 overexpressing Arabidopsis plants under low Pi conditions. (a) 4-day-old seedlings of Arabidopsis wild-type (Col-0) and OsMYB58 overexpressing plants (OsMYB58-AraOX) were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) for 7 days and then the photos were taken. Scale bar indicated the 1.8 cm. (b) Comparison of root architectures between Col-0 and OsMYB58-AraOX seedlings depicted in (a). Scale bar indicated the 1.8 cm. (c-f) After 7 days to high Pi or low Pi, physiological changes in shoot and root were analyzed by various methodological measurements, including shoot fresh weight (c), root fresh weight (d), primary root length (e), and the number of lateral roots (f). (g and h) Pi concentrations were measured in the shoot (g) and root (h) of Col-0 and OsMYB58-AraOX after treatment to high Pi or low Pi for 7 days. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with 10 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the Col-0 (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 3.
Physiological analysis of OsMYB58 overexpressing and knock-out mutant rice plants. (a) 7-day-old seedlings of rice wild-type (WT), OsMYB58 overexpressing plants (OsMYB58-OX), and OsMYB58 T-DNA tagging knock-out mutant (OsMYB58-KO) were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) for 7 days and then the photos were taken. Scale bar indicated the 5 cm. (b-e) After 7 days to high Pi or low Pi, physiological changes in shoot and root were analyzed by various methodological measurements, including fresh weight of shoots (b), fresh weight of roots (c), length of shoots (d), and length of primary roots (e). Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with five seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 3.
Physiological analysis of OsMYB58 overexpressing and knock-out mutant rice plants. (a) 7-day-old seedlings of rice wild-type (WT), OsMYB58 overexpressing plants (OsMYB58-OX), and OsMYB58 T-DNA tagging knock-out mutant (OsMYB58-KO) were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) for 7 days and then the photos were taken. Scale bar indicated the 5 cm. (b-e) After 7 days to high Pi or low Pi, physiological changes in shoot and root were analyzed by various methodological measurements, including fresh weight of shoots (b), fresh weight of roots (c), length of shoots (d), and length of primary roots (e). Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with five seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 4.
Physiological alteration in root architecture of OsMYB58-OX and OsMYB58-KO plants. (a) 3-day-old seedlings of rice WT, OsMYB58-OX, and OsMYB58-KO were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) for 7 days and then the photos were taken in root architecture. The white arrow indicated the primary roots and the yellow arrowhead indicated the seminal roots. Scale bar in upper or middle panels indicated the 1 cm. Scale bar in bottom panels indicated the 0.5 mm. (b-g) After 7 days to high Pi or low Pi, physiological alteration in root architecture was analyzed by various methodological measurements, including length of seminal roots (b), number of seminal roots (c), length of lateral roots (d), number of lateral roots (e), length of root hair (f), and number of lateral roots per 1cm primary roots (g). Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with five seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 4.
Physiological alteration in root architecture of OsMYB58-OX and OsMYB58-KO plants. (a) 3-day-old seedlings of rice WT, OsMYB58-OX, and OsMYB58-KO were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) for 7 days and then the photos were taken in root architecture. The white arrow indicated the primary roots and the yellow arrowhead indicated the seminal roots. Scale bar in upper or middle panels indicated the 1 cm. Scale bar in bottom panels indicated the 0.5 mm. (b-g) After 7 days to high Pi or low Pi, physiological alteration in root architecture was analyzed by various methodological measurements, including length of seminal roots (b), number of seminal roots (c), length of lateral roots (d), number of lateral roots (e), length of root hair (f), and number of lateral roots per 1cm primary roots (g). Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with five seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 5.
Pi accumulation in OsMYB58-OX and OsMYB58-KO plants. Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots (a) and roots (b) of rice WT, OsMYB58-OX, and OsMYB58-KO plants under high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) conditions. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with five seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (**; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 5.
Pi accumulation in OsMYB58-OX and OsMYB58-KO plants. Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots (a) and roots (b) of rice WT, OsMYB58-OX, and OsMYB58-KO plants under high Pi (0.25 mM KH2PO4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH2PO4) conditions. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates with five seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (**; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 6.
Transcripts comparison of Pi-responsive genes and Pi transporters in OsMYB58-OX and OsMYB58-KO plants. 7-day-old seedlings of rice WT,
OsMYB58-OX, and
OsMYB58-KO were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH
2PO
4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH
2PO
4) for 7 days. For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots of high Pi- or low Pi-treated plants. The qRT-PCR analyzed the transcript levels of Pi-responsive genes, such as
OsmiR399a (a),
OsmiR399j (b),
OsIPS1 (c),
OsPHO2 (d),
OsPT2 (e), and
OsPT4 (f) using specific primers in
Supplementary Table S1. Expression of
OsACTIN1 was used for the normalization. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value
≤ 0.05,**; p-value
≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 6.
Transcripts comparison of Pi-responsive genes and Pi transporters in OsMYB58-OX and OsMYB58-KO plants. 7-day-old seedlings of rice WT,
OsMYB58-OX, and
OsMYB58-KO were transferred to medium including high Pi (0.25 mM KH
2PO
4) or low Pi (0.0125 mM KH
2PO
4) for 7 days. For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots of high Pi- or low Pi-treated plants. The qRT-PCR analyzed the transcript levels of Pi-responsive genes, such as
OsmiR399a (a),
OsmiR399j (b),
OsIPS1 (c),
OsPHO2 (d),
OsPT2 (e), and
OsPT4 (f) using specific primers in
Supplementary Table S1. Expression of
OsACTIN1 was used for the normalization. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value
≤ 0.05,**; p-value
≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 7.
Transcriptional activity of OsMYB58 in Arabidopsis protoplast transient system. A schematic diagram showed the effector and reporter plasmid DNA used in the transient expression assay. Combinations with each effector along with two reporters were co-transfected into protoplasts from 2-week-old Arabidopsis leaves. ARF5/MP was used as an experimental positive control, and 35S:LUC plasmid DNA was used as an internal control. After normalization by LUC activity, GUS activity in each transfected protoplast sample was calculated. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the BD-vector (**; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 7.
Transcriptional activity of OsMYB58 in Arabidopsis protoplast transient system. A schematic diagram showed the effector and reporter plasmid DNA used in the transient expression assay. Combinations with each effector along with two reporters were co-transfected into protoplasts from 2-week-old Arabidopsis leaves. ARF5/MP was used as an experimental positive control, and 35S:LUC plasmid DNA was used as an internal control. After normalization by LUC activity, GUS activity in each transfected protoplast sample was calculated. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the BD-vector (**; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).