1. Introduction
Lanthanide ions (Ln
3+)-doped up-conversion luminescence (UCL) materials have attracted significant interests in the areas of display, sensing, anti-counterfeiting, bioimaging and diagnostics owing to their superior optical properties of sharp and tunable 4f → 4f emissions, resistance to photobleaching and no autofluorescence background [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6]. However, the utilization of UCL material as a luminescence probe for bioimaging is currently restricted by the strong absorption of short-wavelength light (below 600 nm) by the tissues, resulting in limited efficacy [
7]. Therefore, the development of red emissions in the “tissue transparent window” (600-1200 nm) is of great significance in achieving deep tissue penetration depth and high-resolution bioimaging [
8,
9,
10,
11,
12]. For Ln
3+-doped UCL, it is known that a host crystal lattice with low symmetry is essential to relax the Laporte selection rule and significantly enhance f-f emissions [
13]. Additionally, the ideal host material should possess low lattice phonon energy to minimize non-radiative multi-phonon relaxation, enhance electron population of excited states, and prolong the excited state lifetime [
14,
15]. Currently, research into Ln
3+-doped UCL materials has predominantly focused on fluoride hosts, particularly
β-NaYF
4, which is renowned for its low phonon energy (418 cm
-1) and asymmetric hexagonal crystal structure [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24]. However, the NaYF
4 is easy to deliquescence in humidity environment due to their poor chemical stability, which finally quench the UCL of Ln
3+ [
25]. Recently, Luo et al have found a new host of ternary rare earth sulfide with phonon energy of 279 cm
-1, which is even lower than that of
β-NaYF
4 and have proven its high quantum yield of UCL under excitation of ~1550 nm [
26,
27]. However, both Er
3+ single-doped and Yb
3+/Er
3+ co-doped NaYS
2 samples exhibit strong green emission due to the long fluorescent lifetime of Er
3+ at
4I
9/2 energy level which results in the favorable population of the green-emitting level (
2H
11/2/
4S
3/2). The red UCL has not been achieved in this promising ternary sulfide matrix material.
In this work, Tm3+ and Ho3+ ions are introduced into Er3+ doped NaYS2 material to achieve pure and efficient red UCL under 1550 nm excitation. The results show that the IR/IG significantly promotes by 31 and 80 times, respectively. This is due to the newly generated energy transfer pathways after cooperating with Tm3+ and Ho3+ ions. The mechanisms of UCL and energy transfer processes are investigated in detail by steady-state fluorescence spectra and dynamics luminescence decay measurements.
2. Results and Discussions
The XRD patterns of NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Tm
3+ and NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Ho
3+ samples are shown in
Figure 1a. As shown in the figure, all the peaks can be well indexed to trigonal crystal structure NaYS
2 with space group of
Rm (PDF#46-1051). This indicates that the pure trigonal NaYS
2 are successfully synthesized for the NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Tm
3+ and NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Ho
3+ phosphors. The crystal structure of NaYS
2 belongs to the α-NaFeO
2-type structure. The [NaS
6] and [YS
6] octahedrons are arranged into alternating layers through edge sharing, which are perpendicular to the
c axis of the crystal (
Figure 1b) [
28,
29]. The SEM images (
Figure 1c and d) show that the sample presents irregular shapes and are agglomerate, which may due to the high synthesis temperature.
The optical properties of Er
3+/Tm
3+ and Er
3+/Ho
3+ co-doped NaYS
2 samples are investigated and presented in
Figure 2. The reflection spectra of Er
3+/Tm
3+ and Er
3+/Ho
3+ co-doped NaYS
2 samples exhibit same reflection peaks at 365, 379, 405, 452, 489, 525, 555, 655, 799, 974, 1473 and 1537 nm, which correspond to the electronic transitions of Er
3+ ions. It is clearly shown that in both samples, the absorption at 1550 nm is much stronger than that at 980 nm. This is due to the large absorption cross-section of Er
3+ ion at
4I
13/2 energy level. The reflection peaks at 463, 686, 777, 1133 and 1207 nm correspond to the transitions of
5I
8 →
5F
2,
3H
6 →
3F
2,
3H
6 →
3H
4,
5I
8 →
5I
6 and
3H
6 →
3H
5 of Ho
3+ or Tm
3+ ions, respectively.
As shown in
Figure 2b, the NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Ho
3+ and NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,1.5%Tm
3+ samples exhibit relatively weak green emissions at 515 ~ 565 nm and intense red emission bands at 640 ~ 680 nm, which are assigned to the
2H
11/2/
4S
3/2 →
4I
15/2 and
4F
9/2 →
4I
15/2 transitions of Er
3+ ions, respectively. The UCL of NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,1.5%Tm
3+ and NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Ho
3+ samples are compared under 980 and 1550 nm excitations with the same laser power. It is observed that the UCL intensities of the both samples under 1550 nm excitation is significantly higher than that excited by 980 nm laser. The integrated UCL intensity excited by 1550 nm is 11 and 10 times higher than that under 980 nm excitation for the NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,1.5%Tm
3+ and NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Ho
3+ samples, respectively. This is due to the high efficiency absorbance at 1550 nm arising from the large absorption cross-section of the
4I
13/2 state of Er
3+ ions. This is consistent with the results of reflectance spectra, i.e., the reflection peak at 1550 nm is much stronger than that at 980 nm as observed in
Figure 2a.
The efficient red UCL is obtained after introducing Tm
3+ or Ho
3+ ions to NaYS
2:Er
3+ phosphors. To investigate the impact of Tm
3+ or Ho
3+ ions on the UCL property of Er
3+ self-sensitized NaYS
2, the UCL spectra and red to green emission intensity ratio (I
R/I
G) of NaYS
2:Er
3+,Tm
3+ and NaYS
2:Er
3+,Ho
3+ samples are shown in
Figure 3. The NaYS
2:Er
3+ sample without doping Tm
3+ or Ho
3+ exhibit a dominant green emission with a minor red emission. After the incorporation of Tm
3+ or Ho
3+ ions, the red UCL of the samples is significantly enhanced and gradually replaces the green UCL as the principal peak. The brightest red luminescence is achieved with a doping concentration of 1.5 mol%Tm
3+ or 0.5 mol%Ho
3+. The insets of
Figure 3a and c show the photo images of the phosphors under 1550 nm excitation. It can be observed that the color of the samples varies significantly from green to red after introducing the Tm
3+ or Ho
3+ ions. The I
R/I
G values increase from 0.17 to 4.73 and 4.90 with low concentration of Tm
3+% = 1.5 mol% and Ho
3+% = 0.5 mol%, respectively. The maximum I
R/I
G of NaYS
2:Er
3+,Tm
3+ and NaYS
2:Er
3+,Ho
3+ samples increase by 31 and 80 times compared to the NaYS
2:Er
3+ sample, respectively (
Figure 3b and d). These findings suggest that after doping Tm
3+ or Ho
3+ ions into NaYS
2:Er
3+ sample, the luminescence color effectively changes from green to red.
To understand the UCL mechanism of samples, the fluorescence decay dynamics of NaYS
2:6%Er
3+, NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,1.5%Tm
3+ and NaYS
2:6%Er
3+,0.5%Ho
3+ samples were measured under 1550 nm excitation (
Figure 4a,c and
Figure S1). According to the formula of
where
I(t) is the fluorescence luminescence intensity at time
t. The calculated lifetime τ of the
4S
3/2 (555 nm),
4F
9/2 (655 nm) and
4I
9/2 (800 nm) levels are listed in
Table 1. As shown in
Figure 4b, the green-emitting state of
4S
3/2/
2H
11/2(Er
3+) is pumped through a simple continuous three-photon absorption processes from the ground state of
4I
15/2. Alternatively, the population of the red-emitting level of
4F
9/2 is more complicated. The critical step is to populate the
4I
11/2 state. Then after absorbing a 1550 nm photon, the Er
3+ ions can be excited to the
4F
9/2 level for red UCL [
23]. However, in the single-doped NaYS
2:Er
3+ sample, the UCL spectra present highly dominant green with faint red emission at 1550 nm excitation (
Figure 3a). This may due to the large energy gap between the
4I
9/2 and
4I
11/2 levels, making this multi-phonon relaxation (MPR) process (
4I
9/2 →
4I
11/2) difficult to occur [
23]. When Tm
3+ ions are incorporated, due to the characteristics of the energy structure of Tm
3+ ions, the energy level of the
4I
9/2(Er
3+) matches with that of
3H
4(Tm
3+), resulting in energy transfer (ET) between Er
3+ and Tm
3+ ions, as indicated ET1 in
Figure 4b. The Tm
3+ ions act as an energy trapping center that effectively stored the transferred energy from Er
3+ ions. This ET from Er
3+ to Tm
3+ ions can result in the lifetime (τ) shortening of the
4I
9/2(Er
3+) level, which is consistent with the τ measurements. As shown in
Table 1, the τ of the
4I
9/2 level decrease significantly from 3432 μs (NaYS
2:Er
3+) down to 636 (NaYS
2:Er
3+,Tm
3+). After that, the population of the
4I
11/2 level is achieved via cross-relaxation (CR) process of
3H
4(Tm
3+) +
4I
13/2(Er
3+) →
3H
5(Tm
3+) +
4I
11/2(Er
3+) (step 5 in
Figure 4b). Then, the red-emitting state of
4F
9/2 are populated by further absorbing a 1550 nm photon or via energy transfer up-conversion (ETU) process of
3F
4(Tm
3+) +
4I
11/2(Er
3+) →
3H
6(Tm
3+) +
4F
9/2(Er
3+) [
6] (step 6 in
Figure 4b). These energy transfer pathways after introducing Tm
3+ ions effectively restrain the population of
4I
9/2(Er
3+) level, thereby achieving efficient red UCL.
When co-dope with Ho
3+ ions, similar energy trapping process occurs in the NaYS
2:Er
3+,Ho
3+ sample. As discussed above, the large energy gap between the
4I
9/2 and
4I
11/2 levels makes the MPR of
4I
9/2 →
4I
11/2 difficult to occur (MPR1). The energy state of
5I
5(Ho
3+) locates between
4I
9/2 and
4I
11/2 states and can store the energy transferred from the
4I
9/2 level of Er
3+ via ET1, as illustrated in
Figure 4d. Further, the
4I
11/2 state is populated via ET from Ho
3+ to Er
3+ ions (ET2). This ET processes are confirmed by the fluorescence decay dynamics which presents a reduction of the τ of
4I
9/2(Er
3+) level after doping the Ho
3+ ions, i.e., the τ decreases from 3432 to 423 μs. After the population of the
4I
11/2 state, the red-emitting
4F
9/2 level are populated by further absorbing a 1550 nm photon or via ETU process of
5I
7(Ho
3+) +
4I
11/2(Er
3+) →
5I
8(Ho
3+) +
4F
9/2(Er
3+) (step 5 in
Figure 4d). Therefore, the dominant red UCL is achieved in the NaYS
2:Er
3+,Ho
3+ sample by altering the energy transfer pathways via Ho
3+ ions.
3. Materials and Methods
The raw material used in this study were Y2O3 (99.99%), Er2O3 (99.99%), Tm2O3 (99.99%), Ho2O3 (99.99%), Na2CO3 (99.99%), and CS2 (99.99%). The raw material was accurately weighed according to the chemical formula NaY1-x-yErxTmyS2 (x = 6 mol%, y = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mol%) and NaY1-x-yErxHoyS2 (x = 6 mol%, y = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mol%). The weighed powders were ground for 30 mins and placed into a corundum boat. Then samples were annealed at 1050 °C for 2 h in the atmosphere of argon and vapor of CS2. After annealing, the NaYS2:Er3+,Tm3+ and NaYS2:Er3+,Ho3+ samples were cooled to room temperature under a flow of Ar.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was measured by using a SHIMADZU-6000 X-ray diffractometer (Cu-Kα radiation, λ = 0.15406 nm, 40 kV, 40 mA, 2θ = 10 ~ 80°). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was carried out with SUPRA 55 SAPPHIRE electron microscope. Diffuse reflectance spectra were measured with a UV-3600 Shimadzu UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer. Photoluminescence spectra and luminescence decay curves were recorded by using the Edinburgh FS5 spectrometer. Excitation sources were provided by a 1550 nm laser diode (CNI laser MDL-III-1550 nm) and a 980 nm laser diode (CNI laser MDL-III-980 nm) with tunable output power. The digital photos were taken using a Canon EOS 5D Mark III camera.
Figure 1.
(a) XRD patterns of NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Tm3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ samples along with a standard pattern of trigonal NaYS2 (PDF#46-1051). (b) Crystal structural diagram of NaYS2. (c) and (d) are SEM images of NaYS2:Er3+ sample.
Figure 1.
(a) XRD patterns of NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Tm3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ samples along with a standard pattern of trigonal NaYS2 (PDF#46-1051). (b) Crystal structural diagram of NaYS2. (c) and (d) are SEM images of NaYS2:Er3+ sample.
Figure 2.
(a) Diffuse reflectance spectra of NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+. (b) Up-conversion luminescence (UCL) spectra of NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ at 980 and 1550 nm excitations, respectively, by utilizing the same laser power of 96 mW.
Figure 2.
(a) Diffuse reflectance spectra of NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+. (b) Up-conversion luminescence (UCL) spectra of NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ at 980 and 1550 nm excitations, respectively, by utilizing the same laser power of 96 mW.
Figure 3.
UCL spectra of (a) NaYS2:6%Er3+,xTm3+ (x = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mol%) and (c) NaYS2:6%Er3+,xHo3+ (x = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mol%) samples at 1550 nm excitation. The insets are the correspondence photo images of the phosphors. (b) and (d) are the IR/IG as a function of Tm3+% and Ho3+%, respectively.
Figure 3.
UCL spectra of (a) NaYS2:6%Er3+,xTm3+ (x = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mol%) and (c) NaYS2:6%Er3+,xHo3+ (x = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mol%) samples at 1550 nm excitation. The insets are the correspondence photo images of the phosphors. (b) and (d) are the IR/IG as a function of Tm3+% and Ho3+%, respectively.
Figure 4.
Fluoresce decay dynamics of 4S3/2 (555 nm), 4F9/2 (655 nm), 4I9/2 (800 nm) energy levels of Er3+ ions in (a) NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+ and (c) NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ under 1550 nm excitation. (b) and (d) are correspondence UCL mechanisms. ET and MPR represents energy transfer and multi-phonon relaxation processes, respectively.
Figure 4.
Fluoresce decay dynamics of 4S3/2 (555 nm), 4F9/2 (655 nm), 4I9/2 (800 nm) energy levels of Er3+ ions in (a) NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+ and (c) NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ under 1550 nm excitation. (b) and (d) are correspondence UCL mechanisms. ET and MPR represents energy transfer and multi-phonon relaxation processes, respectively.
Table 1.
Fluoresce decay time of Er3+ 4S3/2 (555 nm), 4F9/2 (655 nm), 4I9/2 (800 nm) levels in NaYS2:6%Er3+, NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ under 1550 nm excitation.
Table 1.
Fluoresce decay time of Er3+ 4S3/2 (555 nm), 4F9/2 (655 nm), 4I9/2 (800 nm) levels in NaYS2:6%Er3+, NaYS2:6%Er3+,1.5%Tm3+ and NaYS2:6%Er3+,0.5%Ho3+ under 1550 nm excitation.
Energy levels (nm) |
NaYS2:Er3+(μs) |
NaYS2:Er3+,Tm3+ (μs) |
NaYS2:Er3+,Ho3+ (μs) |
555 (4S3/2) |
2173 |
465 |
466 |
655 (4F9/2) |
1346 |
481 |
347 |
800 (4I9/2) |
3432 |
636 |
423 |