1. Introduction
Nurses in general and psychiatric nurses in particular work in a highly stressful and demanding environment. They work long and inconsistent hours, with low income, and dealing with difficult patients, which may affect their well-being, job satisfaction, and burnout [
1,
2]. Psychiatric nurses experience more challenging and demanding work duties. They care for difficult patients who cause burnout, and fatigue. Maintaining a good professional quality of life (ProQoL) for psychiatric nurses is very important for healthcare systems to be able to retain qualified and experienced nurses, and for patient outcomes [
3,
4,
5].
ProQoL is described as the degree to which a group of workers are able to fulfil their personal needs through their experiences in their organizations [
6]. ProQoL is composed of three related dimensions. Two of them are negative consequences of professional care giving: compassion fatigue (CF) and burnout (BO). The third dimension is compassion satisfaction (CS), which is the positive consequences of professional care giving [
6]. CF, which is sometimes called “cost of caring” or “secondary traumatic stress (STS)”, is defined as a natural outcome of physical and emotional reactions to caring for traumatized patients [
6]. Nurses with high levels of STS experience physical and psychological effects such as fatigue, insomnia, headache, abdominal disturbances, sadness, stress, depression, and decrease in attention and concentration [
7,
8,
9]. BO is described as the feeling of difficulty in performing one’s work effectively [
6]. Nurses suffering from BO exhibit many physical and emotional difficulties such as stress, anxiety, muscle itches, job dissatisfaction and have high intention to leave their job [
4,
10]. CS, is described as the pleasure and satisfaction that one’s feel when being able to provide effective care to people or patients [
6]. In contrast to what nurses feel in BO and STS, nurses during CS feel more relaxed, stable, satisfied with their job, and have low intention to leave the job [
11,
12].
There are several studies that measured the levels and predictors of ProQoL among healthcare providers/professionals [
13,
14,
15]; among nurses working in general hospitals [
2,
15,
16,
17,
18]; and among mental health professionals such as nurses, psychiatrists, psychologist [
7,
19]. Also, there are few studies that measure the level and predictors of ProQoL among psychiatric nurses [
3,
8,
10,
11,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25]. However, some of these studies measured only one dimension of the ProQoL. For example, Jalal, et al.; (2019) [
26] measured secondary traumatic stress among psychiatric (STS) nurses, and found that the level was 37.64. Also, Abram and Jacobowitz (2021) [
27] measured BO among psychiatric nurses and found the level to be 19.0.
Results of the levels of ProQoL among psychiatric nurses were varied in general and ranged from 23-43, 17-27, and 13-27 for CS, BO, and STS, respectively. For example, the lowest CS mean score (23.40) was reported by Iranian psychiatric nurses [
24], and the highest (43.45) was reported by South African antenatal mental health nurses [
21]. Regarding the BO, the lowest mean score (17.46) was reported by Turkish psychiatric nurses [
23], and the highest (27.17) was among Iranian psychiatric nurses [
24]. Concerning the STS, the lowest mean score (13.33) was found among by Turkish mental health nurses [
11], and the highest (27.36) was reported by South African psychiatric nurses [
10]. ProQoL correlated and predicted by many demographic and work-related variables. These variables were: age, gender, marital status, income, educational level, years of experience in mental health settings, ward type (acute versus chronic), working shift, intention to leave psychiatric units, and job satisfaction [
3,
8,
10,
11,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25].
Intention to leave working at psychiatric settings has been documented in the literature [
12,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32]. Several factors were associated with intention to leave working at psychiatric hospitals especially in closed units. For example, Jiang, et al.; (2019) [
30] found that more than 20% of Chinese psychiatric nurses have intention to leave their current jobs. Results also found that psychiatric nurses with poor self-rated health, lower income level, dissatisfied with job, and working more hours have higher intention to leave their job. A study conducted among Jordanian psychiatric nurses found that nurses who are male, single, with Bachelor degree, and working in acute wards have higher intention to leave their jobs [
28]. Also, intention to leave job correlated negatively with job satisfaction [
28] and with ProQoL [
7].
There are no available Jordanian studies that assessed the ProQoL and its correlates among psychiatric nurses. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the levels, correlates, and predictors of professional quality of life among Jordanian psychiatric nurses. More specifically, this study aimed to:
Assess the levels of professional quality of life dimensions (CS, BO, and STS), job satisfaction, and intention to leave among psychiatric nurses.
Examine the relationships between professional quality of life dimensions (CS, BO, and STS), job satisfaction, and intention to leave among psychiatric nurses.
Detect differences (if any) in professional quality of life dimensions, job satisfaction, and intention to leave with selected demographic and work-related variables among psychiatric nurses.
Assess the predictors of professional quality of life dimensions (CS, BO, and STS) among psychiatric nurses.
2. Methods
A cross-sectional descriptive design was employed to assess the levels and predictors of professional quality of life among psychiatric nurses. STROBE checklist directed the study.
2.1. Setting
Data were collected from psychiatric nurses working in inpatient mental healthcare settings in Jordan. Mental healthcare services in Jordan consists of four major sectors: Ministry of Health (MOH) sector, military sector, one private hospital, and two university affiliated hospitals. Numbers of beds available for psychiatric patients in Jordan about 677. Of them, 495 beds run by MOH, 38 beds run by the military sector, 120 beds for a private hospital, and 24 for two university affiliated hospitals (World Health Organization [WHO] 2020). In Jordan, the total number of psychiatric nurses working in all mental healthcare hospitals is approximately 441 nurses. Most of them (268) are working in the MOH sector, 51 in military sector, 86 in private sector, and 36 working in university hospitals (personal communication). The number of psychiatric nurses were lower than required according to the total population, therefore, there is a shortage of mental health nurses in Jordan.
2.2. Sampling and Data Collection
G*Power equation was used to estimate the minimal required sample size. For a linear multiple regression with 13 predictors, a power of 0.80, an α of 0.05, with a small effect size (0.15), and a two-tailed test, the minimum sample size recommended to be about 131 participants [
33]. All Jordanian psychiatric nurses who have been working in inpatient psychiatric settings for at least one year were eligible to participate in the study. Nurses who do not provide direct patient care such as administrators and supervisors were excluded. In Jordan, the total number of nurses working in inpatient psychiatric settings is approximately 440 nurses. During the period of data collection, the eligible nurses were around 245. A total of 245 questionnaires were distributed to the selected psychiatric hospitals/units. If they decide to participate in the study, psychiatric nurses were told to fill out the questionnaire and drop it in a sealed box placed in units’ reception. Sealed boxes were collected from all hospitals after two weeks of data collection. Completed questionnaires were received from 144 nurses (response rate=58.7%).
2.3. Instruments
Data were collected using a questionnaire that contains four parts.
2.3.1. Demographic and Work-Related Variables
Demographic variables were: age, gender, marital status, monthly income (by Jordanian Dinar = $1.4), educational level, years of experience in mental health settings, ward (acute, chronic, and mixed cases), working shift (day-A, evening-B, night-C, or mixed-ABC), and setting type (Ministry of Health, Royal Military Medical Services, or educational hospital).
2.3.2. Professional Quality of Life Scale, Version 5 (ProQoL-5)
ProQoL-5 which was developed by Stamm in 2010 was used to measure CS, BO, and STS among psychiatric nurses [
6]. ProQoL-5 consists of 3 subscales (10 items each). It is a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). For each subscale, the possible score ranging from 10 to 50. The higher the score, the higher the level of CS, BO, and STS. A score from 10 to 22 indicates a low level, a score from 23 to 41 indicates an average (moderate) level, and a score from 42 to 50 indicates a high level. The scale has good validity and reliability. Cronbach's alphas were 0.88, 0.75, 0.81, and 0.88 for CS, BO, STS, and overall scale, respectively [
6]. It has adequate convergent, discriminant, and construct validity [
34]. In the current study, the Cronbach alphas were 0.81, 0.71, 0.80, and 0.76 for CS, BO, STS, and overall scale, respectively.
2.3.3. Intention to Leave
Intention to leave psychiatric nursing was measured by asking the psychiatric nurses about their intention to leave working at psychiatric settings. The following statement was used: “If you have the chance to leave working in psychiatric settings, would you do that”? Responses were designed on a 5-Point-Likert-type scale ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Higher scores indicated higher intention to leave job.
2.3.4. Job Satisfaction
Job satisfaction was measured by asking the nurses about their level of satisfaction in working in psychiatric setting using the following statement: “Considering all things, how satisfied are you in working in psychiatric setting”? Responses were designed on a 5-Point-Likert-type scale ranging from 1=strongly dissatisfied to 5=strongly satisfied. Higher scores indicated higher job satisfaction.
2.4. Ethical Consideration
Ethical approval was obtained from the university’s Intuitional Review Board (IRB) (No: 18/6/2021/2022). All psychiatric nurses who agreed to participate were told to sign an attached consent form with each questionnaire. The consent form includes all information regarding study’s purpose, instructions, and freedom to withdraw at any time. Nurses were told that their participation is voluntary, and no personal or identifying information would be collected. Anonymity was assured by not asking any personal or identification data. To assure the confidentiality of data, the questionnaires were handled only by the primary investigator and data were stored in a personal computer with a password.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 was used to analyze data. Descriptive statistics were employed to measure frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Relationships between variables were examined using either Pearson Correlation Coefficients or Spearman rho. Linear multiple regression analyses were run to detect the variables that best predict ProQoL dimensions separately (CS, BO, and STS) and the intention to leave job. Significance level was at 0.05.
4. Discussion
The primary aims of the current study were to assess the levels, relationships, and predictors of professional quality of life of Jordanian psychiatric nurses. Also to assess the correlations of quality of life dimensions with psychiatric nurses’ job satisfaction and intention to leave job.
4.1. Levels of Professional Quality of Life, Intention to Leave, and Job Satisfaction
Results of the current study indicated that the mean scores of CS, BO, and STS were 35.21, 27.0, and 26.36, respectively, reflecting moderate levels. These results were congruent with the results found in most similar studies that measure CS, BO, and STS among psychiatric nurses. In several studies, CS level was found to be between 20.0 [
3] and 41.0 [
10] indicating a moderate level. For examples, among 122 South Korean psychiatric nurses, CS was 35.05 [
22], and was 39.69 among UK psychiatric nurses [
20]. Regarding BO, most similar studies reported level of BO among psychiatric nurses to be between 17.0 [
23] and 40.0 [
3] indicating a moderate level. For instances, BO among 160 psychiatric Iranian nurses was 27.17 [
24], and was 26.92 among 352 Chinese psychiatric nurses [
25]. Concerning STS, most studies that measure STS among psychiatric nurses found the results to be between 13 [
11] and 27.0 [
10] indicating a moderate level. For examples, STS among 163 South African psychiatric nurses was 27.36 [
10] and was around 26.0 among 352 Chinese psychiatric nurses [
25].
Results showed that the mean score of intent to leave was 2.33 (lower than the midpoint, which is 2.5) and for job satisfaction was 3.7 (higher than the midpoint, which is 2.50). These results were congruent with results found by Zheng, et al.; (2017) that most psychiatric nurses were satisfied with their jobs, and that most job satisfaction items were ranged between 3.03 to 3.79 out of 5.0. Further, Baum & Kagan (2015) [
12] found that the mean score of psychiatric nurses’ job satisfaction was 3.8 out of 5. Also, our result regarding intention to leave was congruent with the results found by Kagwe, et al.; (2019) [
31] who found that around one third of psychiatric nurses had intention to leave to another employment. However, contrary to our results, Jiang, et al.; (2019) [
30] found a high percentage of psychiatric nurses who intended to leave their current job.
4.2. Relationships of Professional Quality of Life, Intent to Leave, and Job Satisfaction
Results indicated that the CS correlated positively with monthly income, educational level, and job satisfaction; and negatively with BO, STS, and intent to leave psychiatric settings. BO correlated positively with STS, and intent to leave; and negatively with job satisfaction. STS correlated positively with frequent working shift, and place of work. Our results regarding the relationships among CS, BO, and STS were congruent with the results of most studies that measure the quality of life among psychiatric nurses. For instances, several studies found that CS correlated negatively with BO and STS; and BO correlated positively with STS [
11,
19,
23]. In line with our results regarding job satisfaction, Emmanuel & Odusanya, (2015) [
35] found that the psychological well-being and the general health correlated positively with job satisfaction.
4.3. Differences of Professional Quality of Life with Demographics
Results of this study found that CS was higher among those who are satisfied, have no intension to leave, have higher income, and among higher educational level. Results also indicated that BO was higher among younger, those who have intention to leave, and those who are dissatisfied with their job. Further, results of the current study showed that STS was higher among younger, less experienced, working C-shift regularly, and those who are affiliated with teaching university hospitals. Our results were consistent with the results of other studies that found differences in demographics in relation to CS, BO, and STS. For instances, Mangoulia et al.; (2015) [
8] found differences in CS, BO, and STS among 174 psychiatric nurses working in psychiatric units regarding their willingness to leave their current job. In addition, Basogul et al.; (2021) [
11] found that CS was higher among those who have no intention to leave.
In regard to quality of life and educational level, Alhawatmeh, et al.; (2021) [
1] found that quality of life of Jordanian nurses was higher among nurses with higher level of educational (master degree). However, Park (2021) [
22] and Xie, et al.; (2020) [
25] found that nurses with diploma had higher levels of BO and STS. Regarding working shift, Ruiz-Fernandez, et al.; (2020) [
18] found that nurses who are mostly working in evening reported higher levels of STS, which is consistent with the results found in the current study. Our results also consistent with results of Xie, et al.; (2020) [
25] who found that BO and STS were higher among younger psychiatric nurses. Also, Ruiz-Fernandez, et al.; (2021) [
19] found that CS was higher among younger psychiatric nurses. Further, Xie, at al.; (2020) [
25] found that less experienced nurses had higher levels of STS which supported our results. Contrary to what was found in psychiatric nurses that CS, BO, and STS were differ according to the gender [
17,
23,
25], our results found no differences between male and female nurses in regard to their dimensions of quality of life. Female nurses reported higher levels of CS and STS [
8,
19,
25].
4.4. Predictors of Professional Quality of Life
In the current study, BO, STS, and educational level predicted CS; CS, STS, job satisfaction, and level of education predicted BO; and BO, CS, and frequent working shift predicted STS. Our results regarding the predictor variables were in consistent with the results found by Park (2021) [
22] who reported that educational level predicted BO and STS. Also, similar findings were reported by Xie, et al.; (2020) [
25] who found that job satisfaction predicted CS, BO, and STS among psychiatric nurses. Further, in a sample of Iranian doctors, nurses, and midwives, Keshavarz, et al.; (2019) [
13] found that job satisfaction, older age, and monthly income predicted CS; job satisfaction, working night shifts, and less experience predicted BO. Also, STS were predicted by job satisfaction, female gender, working c-shift, and income level [
13,
18].
4.5. Limitations
This study is the first study that assess the levels and correlates of ProQoL among Jordanian psychiatric nurses working in inpatient psychiatric units. However, there are some limitations of this study. First, using a cross-sectional design established associations among variables but did not permit determination of causality among variables. Second, there is a risk for social desirability responses due to the use of self-reported data which may affect the results. Third, the data collected from nurses working in three psychiatric sectors (public, military, and university affiliated) and did not include nurses working in private sector. Therefore, results cannot be generalized to psychiatric nurses working in private sector. Finally, job satisfaction and intention to leave were measured by a single question with responses ranging from 1-5 which did not give details about those concepts.
4.6. Implications
Future research studies should involve longitudinal studies to determine how these variables changed overtime, and may involve psychiatric nurses working in private psychiatric hospitals. Future studies may employ more valid and reliable scales that measure job satisfaction and intention to leave the job. Also, future studies should explore more individual and institutional factors that influence the ProQoL. Further, interventional studies that targeted the ProQoL of psychiatric nurses may recommended.
Continuing educational programs about ProQoL that enhances CS and reduce BO and STS were recommended to improve psychiatric nurses’ psychological well-being, job satisfaction and retention. Stress reduction programs may also help to improve ProQoL especially for younger and less experienced nurses. Psychiatric nurses are also needs to incorporate some types of professional self-care activities (e.g. yoga, exercise, recreational activities) in their professional life to buffer the effect of BO and STS. It is essential to perform an ongoing assessment and evaluation for psychiatric nurses’ ProQoL, job satisfaction, and intention to leave.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.H and A.A.; methodology, S.H.; software, H.A.; validation, R.M.; A.H. and M.A.; formal analysis, S.H.; investigation, A.H.; resources, H.A.; data curation, A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, SH.; writing—review and editing, M.A.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, S.H.; project administration, S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Table 1.
Demographic and work-related variables (N=144).
Table 1.
Demographic and work-related variables (N=144).
Variable |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Age (years) |
35.61 |
6.55 |
Monthly Income (Jordanian Dinar) |
613.68 |
105.22 |
Experience in psychiatric settings (Years) |
11.72 |
7.93 |
|
Frequencies |
Percentages |
Gender |
|
|
Female |
65 |
45.1 |
Male |
79 |
54.9 |
Marital status |
|
|
Single |
29 |
20.1 |
Married |
115 |
79.9 |
Educational level |
|
|
Associate |
38 |
26.3 |
Bachelor |
98 |
68.1 |
Master and more |
8 |
5.6 |
Ward/unit |
|
|
Acute |
69 |
47.9 |
Chronic |
19 |
13.2 |
Mixed (acute and chronic) |
56 |
38.9 |
Frequent Working Shift |
|
|
A-day |
44 |
30.6 |
B-evening |
39 |
27.1 |
C-night |
61 |
42.4 |
Place of Work |
|
|
Ministry of Health |
70 |
48.6 |
Royal Medical Services |
36 |
25.0 |
University Hospitals |
38 |
26.4 |
Intent to leave psychiatric nursing |
|
|
Strongly disagree |
49 |
34.0 |
Disagree |
48 |
33.3 |
Neutral |
12 |
8.3 |
Agree |
21 |
14.7 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
9.7 |
Job satisfaction |
|
|
Strongly dissatisfied |
4 |
2.8 |
Dissatisfied |
19 |
13.2 |
Neutral |
18 |
12.4 |
Satisfied |
78 |
54.2 |
Strongly Satisfied |
25 |
17.4 |
Table 2.
Mean scores of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress (N=144).
Table 2.
Mean scores of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress (N=144).
Scale |
Possible Range |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Compassion Satisfaction |
10-50 |
35.21 |
6.06 |
Burnout |
10-50 |
27.00 |
4.24 |
Secondary Traumatic Stress |
10-50 |
26.36 |
6.44 |
Intent to leave nursing |
1-5 |
2.33 |
1.34 |
Job Satisfaction |
1-5 |
3.70 |
0.99 |
|
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Compassion Satisfaction |
|
|
|
Low |
10-22 |
6 |
4.2 |
Moderate |
23-41 |
116 |
80.5 |
High |
42-50 |
22 |
13.3 |
Burnout |
|
|
|
Low |
10-22 |
17 |
11.8 |
Moderate |
23-41 |
125 |
86.8 |
High |
42-50 |
2 |
1.4 |
Secondary Traumatic Stress |
|
|
|
Low |
10-22 |
44 |
30.6 |
Moderate |
23-41 |
97 |
67.3 |
High |
42-50 |
3 |
2.1 |
Intent to leave nursing |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
35 |
26.5 |
No |
|
97 |
73.5 |
Job Satisfaction |
|
|
|
Satisfied |
|
103 |
81.7 |
Not Satisfied |
|
23 |
18.3 |
Table 3.
Associations of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress with demographics (N=144).
Table 3.
Associations of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress with demographics (N=144).
Variable |
Compassion satisfaction |
Burnout |
Secondary traumatic stress |
Compassion satisfaction |
1.00 |
|
|
Burnout |
-0.528** |
1.00 |
|
Secondary traumatic stress |
-0.179* |
0.351** |
1.00 |
Age |
0.035 |
-0.115 |
-0.112 |
Gender |
0.002 |
-0.069 |
-0.046 |
Marital status |
0.135 |
-0.127 |
0.002 |
Monthly Income |
0.295** |
-0.145 |
0.023 |
Educational level |
0.270** |
-0.050 |
-0.010 |
Experience in psychiatric settings |
-0.023 |
-0.028 |
-0.115 |
Ward/unit |
-0.021 |
-0.079 |
0.002 |
Frequent Working Shift |
-0.076 |
0.146 |
0.226** |
Place of Work |
0.020 |
0.071 |
0.190* |
Intent to leave psychiatric nursing |
-0.199* |
0.196* |
-0.037 |
Job satisfaction |
0.347** |
-0.331** |
0.081 |
Table 4.
Differences of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress with some demographics (N=144).
Table 4.
Differences of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress with some demographics (N=144).
Variable |
Compassion satisfaction |
Burnout |
STS |
|
Mean |
F/t |
p |
Mean |
F/t |
p |
Mean |
F/t |
p |
Age |
|
-.574 |
.567 |
|
2.35 |
.020 |
|
2.41 |
.017 |
21-35 |
34.92 |
|
|
27.79 |
|
|
27.61 |
|
|
36-51 |
35.51 |
|
|
26.16 |
|
|
25.06 |
|
|
Income level |
|
6.73 |
.002 |
|
1.67 |
.191 |
|
.871 |
.421 |
400-599 |
33.61 |
|
|
27.37 |
|
|
25.57 |
|
|
600-639 |
34.52 |
|
|
27.52 |
|
|
26.38 |
|
|
640-900 |
37.67 |
|
|
26.06 |
|
|
27.28 |
|
|
Psychiatric experience |
|
-.133 |
.894 |
|
1.82 |
.070 |
|
2.03 |
.044 |
1-9 |
35.15 |
|
|
27.67 |
|
|
27.49 |
|
|
10-20 |
35.28 |
|
|
26.39 |
|
|
25.34 |
|
|
Gender |
|
-.027 |
.978 |
|
.828 |
.409 |
|
.546 |
.586 |
Female |
35.20 |
|
|
27.32 |
|
|
26.69 |
|
|
Male |
35.22 |
|
|
26.73 |
|
|
26.10 |
|
|
Marital status |
|
-1.63 |
.106 |
|
1.52 |
.129 |
|
-.022 |
.983 |
Single |
33.58 |
|
|
28.07 |
|
|
26.34 |
|
|
Married |
35.62 |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
26.37 |
|
|
Educational Level |
|
5.96 |
.003
|
|
1.95 |
.145 |
|
.906 |
.406 |
Associate |
32.45 |
|
|
26.84 |
|
|
25.94 |
|
|
Bachelor |
36.10 |
|
|
27.28 |
|
|
26.74 |
|
|
Master and more |
37.50 |
|
|
24.25 |
|
|
23.75 |
|
|
Ward/Unit |
|
.332 |
.718 |
|
1.13 |
.327 |
|
.528 |
.591 |
Acute |
35.20 |
|
|
27.52 |
|
|
26.16 |
|
|
Chronic |
36.21 |
|
|
26.10 |
|
|
27.78 |
|
|
Mixed |
34.89 |
|
|
26.66 |
|
|
26.14 |
|
|
Frequent Shift worked |
|
1.43 |
.242 |
|
1.64 |
.198 |
|
3.86 |
.023 |
A |
36.34 |
|
|
26.07 |
|
|
24.59 |
|
|
B |
34.10 |
|
|
27.18 |
|
|
25.84 |
|
|
C |
35.11 |
|
|
27.55 |
|
|
27.98 |
|
|
Affiliation |
|
.032 |
.969 |
|
2.15 |
.120 |
|
4.72 |
.010 |
Ministry of Health |
35.08 |
|
|
27.01 |
|
|
25.70 |
|
|
Royal Medical Services |
35.30 |
|
|
25.94 |
|
|
24.89 |
|
|
University Hospitals |
35.36 |
|
|
27.97 |
|
|
29.00 |
|
|
Intention to leave nursing |
|
2.94 |
.004 |
|
-3.01 |
0.007 |
|
.164 |
.866 |
Yes |
32.57 |
|
|
28.86 |
|
|
26.34 |
|
|
No |
35.94 |
|
|
26.38 |
|
|
26.56 |
|
|
Job satisfaction |
|
-3.89 |
< .000 |
|
3.31 |
.001 |
|
-1.46 |
.146 |
Yes, satisfied |
36.41 |
|
|
26.29 |
|
|
26.97 |
|
|
No, not satisfied |
31.13 |
|
|
29.48 |
|
|
24.74 |
|
|
Table 5.
Stepwise multiple regression model predicting compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress (N=144).
Table 5.
Stepwise multiple regression model predicting compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress (N=144).
|
B |
β |
F |
p |
Predictors of Compassion Satisfaction
|
|
|
44.40 |
< 0.000 |
1. Burnout |
-0.944 |
-0.661 |
|
|
2. Secondary traumatic stress |
-0.388 |
0.413 |
|
|
3. Educational level |
2.77 |
0.241 |
|
|
Model Summary R2 Adjusted R2 Total Variance |
0.488 0.477 47.7% |
|
|
|
Predictors of Burnout |
|
|
38.53 |
< 0.000 |
1. Compassion satisfaction |
-0.409 |
-0.585 |
|
|
2. Secondary traumatic stress |
0.310 |
0.471 |
|
|
3. Job Satisfaction |
-0.749 |
-0.176 |
|
|
4. Level of education |
1.021 |
0.127 |
|
|
Model Summary R2 Adjusted R2 Total Variance |
0.526 0.512 51.2% |
|
|
|
Predictors of Secondary Traumatic Stress |
|
|
23.75 |
< 0.000 |
1. Burnout |
0.898 |
0.591 |
|
|
2. Compassion satisfaction |
-0.536 |
0.504 |
|
|
3. Frequent shift work |
1.352 |
0.178 |
|
|
Model Summary R2 Adjusted R2 Total Variance |
0.337 0.323 32.3% |
|
|
|