1. Introduction
Being one of the eight vitamins of group B, vitamin B
12 (vit. B
12), also called cobalamin due to the presence of cobalt mineral in its structure, has been often mentioned to be essential for cellular metabolism [
1]. It is known to be involved in the synthesis of DNA molecules and myelin but also intervenes in the mediation of oxidative stress [
2]. Its deficiency in the body was linked to motor alterations, memory loss, irritability, poor balance, and cognitive impairment [
1,
2,
3]. It has been frequently associated with increased anemia, alterations in the central or peripheric nervous system, and the onset of mechanisms prior to disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia, and epilepsy [
3,
4,
5]. Vit. B
12 serves as a cofactor for two enzymes [
6]. Methionine synthase in the cytoplasm demands vit. B
12 in the form of methylcobalamin to catalyze the conversion of homocysteine to methionine. If the process is impaired due to the lack in vit. B
12, the intracellular homocysteine increases, homocysteine being implicated in the mediation of ROS buildup, e.g., homocysteine auto-oxidation [
7]. Vit. B
12 is also essential for the mitochondrial enzyme methylmalonyl CoA mutase, which converts methylmalonyl CoA to succinyl CoA, a step in the oxidation of odd-chain fatty acids and the catabolism of ketogenic amino acids [
1].
Mentioned for the first time in 1985, the concept of ”oxidative stress” has been defined as the imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants, characterizing the capacity of an organism to maintain its physiological state [
8,
9,
10]. Usually, the increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are linked with important changes in cell functioning that lead to biomolecule damage and, in the end, can determine cell apoptosis [
11,
12]. It was indicated that there is a strong correlation between ASD and oxidative stress [
13].
Recognized through the presence of significant disruptions in speech, social skills, and repetitive behavior, ASD is a well-known neurodevelopmental illness that started to gain more attention due to its high incidence [
14,
15]. Recent data highlights the prevalence of ASD among US children, estimated at 1 in 36 [
16]. The rate of prevalence depends on several variables. For instance, it was shown that the frequency of ASD is greater for Asian children, non-Hispanic Black children, children with higher Social Vulnerability Index scores, or for children that receive treatment in urban primary care locations [
17]. Additionally, the sex ratio difference is another concern among specialists. There are reports that present a much higher incidence for boys than girls in detecting ASD, and this is due to the complicated way to discover the specific autistic features in girls [
18]. In reality, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V), ASD is diagnosed based on three main characteristics, such as difficulty in social communication, deficiencies in social relationships and specific, repetitive patterns of behavior, activities or interests [
19,
20,
21]. Although its etiology is not fully understood, ASD may be seen from a complex perspective that combines genetic and environmental components [
15,
22,
23,
24]. The most common reason is genetic susceptibility, although prenatal stresses, infections, parental age, dysfunctional familiar relationships, and exposure to neurotoxic chemicals are all believed to be risk factors [
25,
26,
27,
28,
29].
For instance, the lack of a sufficient amount of cobalamin in the bodies of autistic people is mainly due to poor nutrition poor in micronutrients, but this is not the only cause [
4,
30]. Data on the prevalence of clinical eating issues such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in the autism population is limited, but the latest results indicate that these conditions are more common in people with autism and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to the general population [
31,
32,
33,
34]. Moreover, screening for vit. B
12 in children diagnosed with ASD showed lower vitamin levels compared to the control group, according to several studies [
35,
36,
37,
38]. Methylcobalamin supplementation has been proven to be effective for participants in several studies carried out, leading to a relief of the autistic-related symptoms [
39,
40,
41,
42,
43]. Even though not much research has been done on the effect of vit. B
12 in ASD or its effectiveness in alleviating core or associated symptoms, it appears that the current evidence supports the vitamin's capacity to help and even to be regarded as a prospective treatment intervention [
43].
The role of vit. B
12 has long been acclaimed, starting with the preliminary data obtained from experimental research, whose outcome contributed to new data acquisition. For instance, vitamin activity has been investigated in several studies that used animals as model organisms (zebrafish, mice, rats) for a specific disorder. Although an animal model cannot 100% mimic human features, there are three rules for validating its suitability as a model; it should have similar causes or mechanisms of onset, similar symptoms, and similar responsiveness to treatment [
44,
45]. In this study, zebrafish (
Danio rerio) was chosen due to its multiple advantages, and it was considered to be eligible for developing an animal model for ASD; a fact highlighted by numerous reports [
46,
47,
48,
49,
50]. In addition, it possesses the full complement of cobalamin metabolic enzymes, and its deficiency can be caused by mutations in MMACHC, a gene responsible for vit. B
12 activity regulation [
6,
51,
52]. According to Sloan et al. [
51], zebrafish with mmachc mutant alleles showed impaired growth and developmental delays, but also responded to established therapies, suggesting that this may be a suitable model for studying cobalamin deficiency. A 2012 study evaluated the effect of various vit. B
12 levels in zebrafish and demonstrated that 5 µg vit. B
12 kg
-1 was insufficient to support whole-body vitamin storage, but there were also no signs of deficiency [
53]. When vit. B
12 was administered in a mixture with 100 µg L
-1 malathion, an organophosphate insecticide, it conducted to an arousal of the motor functions by modulating acetylcholinesterase activity. These results were further sustained by the diminished oxidative stress status [
54].
Aside from the genetic component, the environment has recently attracted more attention as a risk factor for ASD. Specialists started to point out the involvement of the environment in ASD and the negative impact [
14,
22,
26,
28]. An imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity in most cases of ASD has been hypothesized as a common underlying defect with many converging etiologies. For example, the impairment of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission in autistic people is described by numerous reports [
55,
56,
57]. The present findings led to the choice of a mixture of pesticides (fipronil and pyriproxyfen), whose synergistic effect was correlated with the induction of GABA malfunction. Fipronil (FIP) is a compound from the phenylpyrazole class of insecticides that acts on the insect nervous system [
58]. The main mechanism of action is the inhibition of GABA receptors and glutamate gated chloride channels, and, depending of the dose, this could end in extreme neuronal excitation until the death of the organism [
59,
60]. Pyriproxyfen (PYR) is a compound that mimics the natural hormone for insect growth [
61]. Both compounds, alone or in mixture, are linked to developmental and histological abnormalities, behavioral disturbances, and elevated levels of oxidative stress [
62,
63,
64,
65,
66,
67,
68,
69,
70,
71].
Due to the increased role of the environment as a risk factor for ASD and the need for new therapeutic interventions for autistic people, the present study aimed to evaluate the effects of vit. of B12 and a mixture of pesticides administered individually or in combination in a zebrafish animal model, mimicking a real-life scenario. This objective was approached in the following steps: (1) evaluation of the effect of the compounds on locomotor activity, (2) characterization of sociability after exposure to the compounds, and (3) measurement of specific parameters for oxidative stress.
4. Discussion
The purpose of this study was to determine if vit. B12 can act as a therapeutic tool in an ASD animal model developed through environmental risk factor exposure. Modeling traits comparable to those stated in autistic people in an organism implies multiple phases. The first step in the construction of an animal model is the discovery of a suitable inductor, followed by the validation of the existence of ASD and the evaluation of an adequate response after trying a recognized therapeutic method. The effectiveness of vit. B12 in treating symptoms induced by exposure to FIP and PYR (already established to have potential to develop ASD impairments) was assessed in this trial. So far, no animal studies have been performed to evaluate the effects of vit. B12 on locomotor activity, on social features, or in association with ASD. Being the first study of its kind, these findings reveal that vit. B12 can assist zebrafish restore normal behavior after exposure to a mixture of pesticides by interacting with enzymes of the antioxidant system. As shown in the study results section, supplementing the zebrafish diet with vit. B12 led to improved levels of movement parameters describing fish locomotor activity.
Hyperactivity was one of the main findings recorded for the pesticide group that presented high values for distance, velocity, and maximum acceleration parameters in comparison to the other experimental groups. Even not significant, it could be seen the differences between pretreatment and treatment phases. Considering that there was a single high exposure to the mixture of pesticides, the impact could be seen over the whole study period, particularly during the first week. This may be explained by the time required for pesticides to be metabolized in fish. Besides, the excessive movement can also be a response to the interaction of fish with the two pesticides, that causes the appearance of stress, triggering an increase in cortisol secretion but also in ROS [
78,
79]. This observation has been made in many research studies after FIP and PYR exposure due to pesticide transformation into more toxic and lasting compounds. To give an example, the administration of a single oral dose of PYR (2 and 1000 mg kg
-1) to rats showed not only that this pesticide has a higher excretion rate, but also a reduced depuration period, when the presence of tissue residues was determined after 7 days [
80]. A more recent work, in which zebrafish were exposed to 10 and 100 μg L
-1 PYR for 30 days, demonstrated the ability of the pesticide to accumulate after only one day of exposure, while the depuration period of 14 days indicated different half-life values: 2.3 days and 92.5% on day 7 for the lowest dose compared to 1.2 days and 94.6% on day 7 for the highest. In addition, compared with the other metabolites, both doses of PYR inhibited the activity of CAT and SOD in the liver [
81]. Similar results as well as elevated levels of lipid peroxidation in the brain and kidney were obtained after oral administration of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg kg
-1 body weight FIP to mice for 28 days [
65]. The same observations were made in zebrafish after 96 hours of exposure to 0.5, 1 and 2 mg L
-1 FIP [
82]. Compared with the previous study, in the present work, no significant effects were recorded on the activities of SOD, GPx and MDA after pesticide exposure. This may be explained by variations in dose, exposure time and developmental stage that may trigger different consequences on zebrafish. Moreover, when this pesticide mixture was used in a 14-day treatment on zebrafish, it resulted in increased activities for SOD, GPx and MDA [
83]. Consequently, it can be concluded that there is a link between the transformation of pesticides and the occurrence of oxidative stress, especially through the overproduction of free radicals, which can overwhelm the antioxidant system.
Although the effect of vit. B12 on the social behavior of zebrafish was not evidenced, oscillations between the left and central arms were observed after two weeks of treatment. On the other hand, the group exposed to 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 and 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, showed a clear preference for the region with social cues, suggesting that vit. B12 may participate in certain fish metabolism processes, allowing them to behave as prior to treatment. This observation could lead to the conclusion that the vitamin does not directly participate or act on social behavior, but its involvement in other metabolic processes could impact the behavior of individuals. For example, compared to the results of the previous group, a single dose of the pesticide mixture was capable to induce short- and medium-term changes in fish sociability in the first week of exposure. This behavioral alteration did not last until the end of experimental period, indicating that pesticides and their effects began to fade via the excretion process as soon as fish were transferred to system water. Even if the differences were not validated by a specific degree of significance, the graphical representations indicate certain trends for the behavioral parameters studied, which must be further investigated.
The potential antioxidant effect of vit. B12 was several times mentioned but it remains unclear, though its involvement as broad-spectrum micronutrient is known [
84]. A recently published study discovered associations between subclinical vit. B
12 deficiency and serum metabolic markers linked to neuron and mitochondria function, and increased oxidative stress [
85]. Moreover, vit. B
12 interacts with superoxide, a product of aerobic metabolism, at rates comparable to SOD, which highlighted the mimetic behavior of the vitamin towards the enzyme. [
86,
87]. Thereby, it can indicate a possible mechanism through which vitamin protects against chronic inflammation and controls redox homeostasis. In this study, exposure to 0.24 μg L
-1 vit. B
12 for 14 days conducted to elevated activities for SOD and GPx, while when the vitamin was given after the pesticide mixture, its activity was lower than for control group. Similar to these results, a 7-days treatment with 0.63 g kg
-1 vit. B
12 reduced hepatic enzymes levels (aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase), increased antioxidant activities, and diminished inflammatory cell infiltration and necrosis process in a male rat study for acetaminophen hepatotoxicity [
88].
A possible explanation for this finding could be the ability of the vitamin administered in a non-stressful environment to promote and enhance the activity of the enzymes of the antioxidant system. On the other hand, in a disturbed environment (exposure to a mixture of pesticides) the vitamin participated together with the antioxidant system in counteracting the effects induced by FIP and PYR even if it was a single exposure. At the same time, the rate of accumulation in the zebrafish body and the products resulting from the metabolism of FIP and PYR may cause variations in the response to contact with the compounds. The ability of FIP to accumulate and the rate of metabolite formation in rainbow trout (
Oncorhynchus mykiss) was measured after 32 days exposure followed by 96 days depuration. It concluded that FIP is rapidly converted to its metabolite, fipronil sulfone; known to have a longer half-life [
89]. For instance, the elimination half-life of FIP was 8.5 hours compared to 208 hours for fipronil sulfone after administration of 4 mg kg
-1 FIP in rats [
60,
90]. Also, the persistence of fipronil sulfone was confirmed after a 7 days depuration process in European sea bass (
Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles previously fed with 10 mg kg
-1 FIP for 14 days [
91].
Another parameter measured for identifying the existence of oxidative stress was MDA, a popular marker for lipid peroxidation. The exposure to a single dose of pesticides followed by 14 days vit. B
12 led to a decrease in the MDA level compared to the other groups. This result indicates a possible intervention of the vitamin to regulate the balance between ROS products and antioxidants, which is also supported by the decreased activities of SOD and GPx. Dietary supplementation with vit. B
12 had a positive influence on the methylation process, GSH activity, and oxidative stress in autistic children, after an 8-week therapy [
41]. Similar results were previously reported by Bertoglio et al. following a 3-month therapy with 0.06 mg kg
-1 vit. B
12 [
40]. A substantial decreased level of vit. B
12 was recently found by two studies that assessed the vitamin's activity in children with ASD [
37,
92]. Perturbation in vitamin activity can also occur due to genetic mutations, as demonstrated in zebrafish by mutations in the abcd4 gene, whose deficiency caused anemia, or the mmachc gene responsible for vitamin processing and transporting to the cellular level [
51,
93]. Vitamin deficiency was also proven in a mouse model of ischemic stroke, where both females and males had impaired balance and coordination, as well as higher homocysteine levels compared to the 0.025 mg kg
-1 group [
94]. Neurologic alterations such as anxiety, deficits in learning and memory, and changes in brain mass were obtained in a knockout mouse in which the transcobalamin receptor (TCblR) gene (CD320) was ablated [
95].
Finally, the interaction between vit. B12, antioxidants and ROS should be further studied and developed using animal models in an environmental setting, especially due to the high incidence of side effects, but also in a neuropsychiatric context.
Figure 1.
The experimental design of the study for evaluating the impact of vitamin B12 and pesticide mixture on zebrafish.
Figure 1.
The experimental design of the study for evaluating the impact of vitamin B12 and pesticide mixture on zebrafish.
Figure 2.
The T-maze adaptation for performing the locomotor activity test; C: center arm, L: left arm, R: right arm and SP: start point.
Figure 2.
The T-maze adaptation for performing the locomotor activity test; C: center arm, L: left arm, R: right arm and SP: start point.
Figure 3.
The T-maze adaptation for performing the social interaction test; C: center arm, L: left arm, R: right arm, SP: start point, SSZ: social stimulus zone, TZ: tested zone.
Figure 3.
The T-maze adaptation for performing the social interaction test; C: center arm, L: left arm, R: right arm, SP: start point, SSZ: social stimulus zone, TZ: tested zone.
Figure 4.
The total distance travelled by juveniles from experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); *p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 4.
The total distance travelled by juveniles from experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); *p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 5.
The average swimming speed of the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 5.
The average swimming speed of the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 6.
The maximum acceleration of the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 6.
The maximum acceleration of the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 7.
The active swimming parameter recorded for all the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 7.
The active swimming parameter recorded for all the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 8.
The inactive status recorded for all the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 8.
The inactive status recorded for all the experimental groups. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment; Green: control, purple: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12, blue: 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR, and orange: 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 + 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 9.
The time spent in the T-maze areas during the social interaction test presented through heatmaps. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment.
Figure 9.
The time spent in the T-maze areas during the social interaction test presented through heatmaps. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment.
Figure 10.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the control group. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 10.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the control group. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 11.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the group exposed to 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 11.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the group exposed to 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 12.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the group exposed to 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR mixture. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 12.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the group exposed to 600 μg L-1 FIP+PIR mixture. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 13.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the group exposed to 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 and 600 μg L-1 FIP+ PIR mixture. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 13.
The time spent in the T-maze areas, recorded for the group exposed to 0.24 μg L-1 vit. B12 and 600 μg L-1 FIP+ PIR mixture. D stands for day, PTR: pretreatment, TR: treatment. The data is expressed as average ± SEM (n= 15); p< 0.05 ANOVA, Tukey is significant compared to the results from PTR stage.
Figure 14.
The graphical representation of the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and malondialdehyde (MDA) for the experimental groups. The data is expressed as average ± SEM; *p< 0.05 Tukey compared to the control.
Figure 14.
The graphical representation of the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and malondialdehyde (MDA) for the experimental groups. The data is expressed as average ± SEM; *p< 0.05 Tukey compared to the control.
Table 1.
Environmental conditions from the housing and experimental tanks observed during the experimental period.
Table 1.
Environmental conditions from the housing and experimental tanks observed during the experimental period.
Type of tank |
Temperature (° C) |
pH |
Conductivity (µS cm-1) |
Salinity |
Ammonia (mg L-1) |
Housing tank |
26 ± 0.5 |
7.6 |
551 |
0.26 |
0.05 |
Experimental tanks |
25 ± 0.5 |
7.5 |
553 |
0.24 |
0.06 |