1. Introduction
Conjugated polymers are attractive for many applications such as solar cell applications, [
2,
3] optical devices, [
4] chemical sensors [
5] and biological sensors [
6] due to their unique properties. Among the developing conjugated polymers, conjugated polyelectrolytes (CPEs) containing of a conjugated main chain and side chains with various functional groups have been intensively investigated [
7,
8,
9]. Their molecular structure can easily be tuned, making them suitable for an enormous number of specific applications. By virtue of their light harvesting properties, CPEs have also been utilized as photosensitizers in fluorescent sensors [
9] and solar cells applications [
8,
9,
10]. The basis of such successful utilization of the CPEs in the optoelectronic applications is their chemical strictures which can be easily changed as well as their semiconducting properties with large optical densities [
11,
12]. In addition, their high emission intensities can be also one of its important features to be used for fluorescence resonance energy transfer. [
11,
12,
13] In particular, the key issues of the CPEs for the solar cell applications are their flexibility along with its simple, large scale, and low cost fabrication devices. [
7,
14] Other advantage is that functional groups of the side chains can be ionic or polar moieties, which make it easy to modify not only solubility of the CPEs in water and other polar solvents [
15] but also redox potentials, intermolecular interactions, energy level, which determine electronic coupling [
16] and the rate of electron transfer at the donor-acceptor interface. [
7,
13,
17]
It is well known that in the solar cell devices, rapid electron or energy transfer to overcome electron-hole recombination is absolutely required to reach high light energy conversion efficiency. [
18] In this sense, the interaction, linking, and distance between the electron donor and acceptor moieties play a crucial role. Therefore, for the CPEs, in particular, they should form strong interconnections and interpenetrations with the electron acceptor moieties to attain efficient electron or energy transfer [
1]. An innovative approach utilizing the electrostatic interactions between cationic CPEs with negatively charged electron acceptor moieties has consequently attracted great attention. [
7,
17,
18] With this approach, for example, strong electrostatic interactions between cationic CPEs and DNA and DNA bases were achieved, allowing the detection of DNA and DNA bases based on the fluorescence quenching of the cationic CPEs. [
6] In addition to such a fascinating method to detect DNA and DNA bases, efficient energy transfer from photoexcited cationic polyfluorene, one of CPEs, to porphyrins demonstrated that the cationic polyfluorene can form electrostatic assembly with small molecules, and in the assembly it acts as a photosensitizer. [
19]
Recently, polyfluorene with azide derivatives have been covalently linked with graphene flakes, and the produced materials have been demonstrated to have low bandgaps and high charge carrier mobility and are potential materials for solar cells. [
20] It is therefore an interesting challenge to explore the electron or energy transfers in non-covalent polyfluorene associations, which can provide a unique study on bimolecular electron transfer reactions of polyfluorene in solution phase. [
20,
21,
22,
23] Like in the case of photoexcitation dynamics of small molecules, vertical excitation of the electron donor-acceptor system would also induce electron or energy transfer, [
21] and the rate of the photoinduced electron transfer (PET), charges separation (CS), and charge recombination (CR) can be related to the quenching mechanism. [
22] Thus, understanding the quenching dynamics of polyfluorene as well as electron or energy transfer from the excited polyfluorene to the quenchers are critically important to develop solar cell materials based on water- or organic solvent-soluble polyfluorenes [
23] and on solid-phase polyfluorenes. [
24]
In this paper, polyfluorene with positively charged, namely poly [(9,9-di(3,3’-N,N’-trimethyl-ammonium) propyl fluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-co-(9,9-dioctyl-fluorenyl-2,7-diyl)] diiodide salt (PFN) and negatively charged graphene carboxylate (GC) were reported PET in non-covalent. The reasons behind using GC were because (i) it is one of strong electron acceptor moieties to several porphyrin derivatives, resulting in ultrafast and efficient electron transfer. [
25], and (ii) its opposite charge would provide strong electrostatic interactions with PFN. Because this non-covalent PFN/GC system is of interest and gives a good model of PET in the polyfluorene electrostatically interacted with the electron acceptor, this work has been studied and scientifically reported in this paper. To make this work more interesting, a comparison between what has been discovered in this paper (PFN
+-GC
-) interface along with what has been investigated before (PFN
+-DCB) interface [
1] are well reported for the first time. The non-covalent associations of polyfluorene with neutral electron acceptor 1,4-dicyanobenzene (DCB). DCB has been demonstrated as an electron acceptor in bimolecular PET in perylene/DCB systems. [
1,
26,
27] This means that DCB is also a strong electron acceptor and may form donor-acceptor pairs with PFN. Steady-state absorption and emission spectroscopies showed the strong affinity of PFN on the GC surface and efficient quenching of the PFN fluorescence. However, by comparing the fluorescence lifetimes of PFN by GC and that by DCB shows in pervious work [
1], it can be clearly demonstrated that the quenching mechanism of the PFN/GC systems is static, whereas that of the PFN/DCB systems is dynamic.
This finding is supported by femtosecond time-resolved absorption spectra, which reveal ultrafast electron transfer from the photoexcited PFN to GC (within 0.02 ps time scales), which is much faster than that taking place from the photoexcited PFN to DCB (within <5 ps time scales) [
1].
One of their many advantages of the present cationic polyfluorene
is, therefore, the control over the electrostatic interactions and electron transfers in non-covalent polyfluorene/quencher systems
in aqueous solution. Furthermore, based on polyfluorene, once can be easily modified side chains of the polyfluorene in the future to construct new non-covalent associations.
3. Results and Discussion
First, the absorption spectra of PFN alone and PFN with successive addition of GC, in the absence of the GC, the absorption spectrum of PFN has a maximum peak at 402 nm with a shoulder at 383 nm and absorption cutoff at 450 nm. Upon successive GC addition, the absorption spectrum of PFN is shifted upward with GC concentration. This upward shift was demonstrated for the whole range of the recorded wavelength, and it was mainly originating from the absorption contribution of GC. The absorption and fluorescence of PFN with successive addition of GC are shown in
Figure 1A.
On the other hand, upon DCB addition, a consecutive increase was observed in the region below 360 nm [
1], this was because DCB does not absorb light in the visible region. Thus, in general, the spectra of the mixtures are the superposition of the absorptions of the PFN and the electron acceptors. This indicates that, upon the electron acceptor addition, the electronic structure of the PFN is unaffected or, in other words, the ground state interactions between the PFN and the electron acceptors do not form the CT complex formation.
Excitation at 380 nm shows rise a fluorescence spectrum of the PFN in the visible region in the range of 400-550 nm centered at 424 nm with two vibrionic shoulders at 447 and 485 nm respectively. Successive addition of GC results in quenching of the PFN emission. 97% quenching of the PFN was observed upon addition of 0.120 mg/mL GC indicating that, in comparison to a neutral DCB, a negatively charged GC was more effective for the enhanced fluorescence quenching of PFN.
Second, the emission spectra of PFN and PFN-GC are showing in
Figure 1B, it may note that the fluorescence quenching refers to electron or energy transfer from the excited PFN to the quencher. Because the fluorescence intensity for all of the PFN peaks was decreasing at the proportional scales, resulting in consistent spectral shape of the emission without any new emission band, here, it can be safely concluded that there is no energy transfer process from the photoexcited PFN to the electron acceptors. However, for PFN/DCB system, in particular, saturation of reaction mixture was observed for DCB concentration above 0.25 M. DCB above this saturation level leads to precipitation and a decrease in the OD of the UV-Vis spectrum [
1]. The key difference of the fluorescence quenching behavior of the PFN by GC and DCB is revealed by the fluorescence lifetime of PFN-GC and PFN-DCB systems at different concentrations of the quencher. In the PFN-GC system, the same fluorescence lifetime PFN in the absence and presence of GC clearly indicates that the quenching in PFN-GC systems proceeds according to a static mechanism. [30,31] In contrast, the fluorescence lifetime PFN in the presence of DCB is shorter than that in the absence of DCB, supporting the dynamic nature of the interaction. [32] The different quenching mechanisms are measured to give different rates of the PET process; where the rate of PET for quenching through static mechanism in the PFN-GC systems found to be much faster than that in the PFN-DCB systems due to its dynamic mechanism. In addition to the driving force of the electron transfer process, [33] in the earlier case, the rate constant depends on the electronic coupling, [
16] whereas in the latter case the rate constant should be determined by diffusion of the electron donor and acceptor moieties. [
22,
28] This issue is further evaluated by ultrafast TA spectroscopy, which provides detailed information on the photoexcitation dynamics.
Third,
Figure 3 illustrates transient absorption TA spectra of PFN in the absence (
Figure 3A) and presence of two different concentrations (0.03 and 0.12 mg/mL) of GC (
Figure 3B,C) after photoexcitation at 410 nm. As shown in
Figure 3A, excitation of the PFN alone immediately results in ground state bleach (GSB) at 410 nm, stimulated emission (SE) at 600 nm, and broad excited state absorption (ESA) band centered at 580 nm. Both the GSB recovery and ESA decay are dominated by slow dynamics and the GSB is recovered on the same time scales with the ESA decay without any spectral shift and new emerging band. Within 5 ns time delay, the GSB is recovered up to 80% and ESA band decays up to 70%.
As presented in the kinetics figures (
Figure 4A,B), the kinetics of the GSB recovery and ESA decay can be adequately described by a single exponential fit with a time constant of 0.012 ps. This indicates that the excited single state S
1 of PFN has a long lifetime in a few ps time scales and it decays directly into the ground state through CR process.
In the presence of 0.03 and 0.12 mg/mL of GC (
Figure 3B,C), the transient spectral feature of PFN-GC associations is basically similar to those of PFN alone. New absorption bands which can be assigned to the existences of PFN
+•-GC
-• radical ion pairs are not clearly observed. However, the results shown in
Figure 4A, B for the kinetics of ESA at 600 nm and GSB at 410 nm for different GC concentrations reveal that the kinetics of GSB recovery and ESA decay are GC concentration-dependent.
Exponential fits to the data shown in the kinetic traces figure (
Figure 4) propose that the kinetics of the ESA decay absolved at 600 nm (A), and GSB recovery, absolved at 410 nm (B), are biexponential with two-time constants of ~00.27 ± 00.019 ps and ~00.50 ± 00.020 ps, respectively. The rapid GSB recovery and ESA decay of the PFN in a few ps may apparently be due to contribution from the ultrafast PET from the excited PFN to GC as well as CR recovering the PFN ground state. This thought is supported by the inspection of the kinetics in
Figure 4, in which the amplitude of the fast component increases systematically with the GC concentration (80 and 70% for 0.03 and 0.12 mg/mL GC addition, respectively). The ultrafast PET and CR processes indicate the strong interactions and electronic couplings of PFN on the GC surface. Since the CR process is ultrafast, it is the reason behind the absence of PFN
+•-GC
-• radical ion pairs in the spectra. This is also consistent with the trend of the static mechanism of the fluorescence quenching. In comparison with other bimolecular systems based on the electrostatic interactions of GC, it has been found that the rate of PET process from the PFN to GC is in agreement with those observed in porphyrins/GC systems (within few tens of ps). [
25] Accordingly, it is believed that the slow component of ESA decay and GSB recovery of the PFN in few hundreds ps is related to the relaxation of free or uncomplexed PFN, which reductions subsequently in the presence of GC as indicated by the lower amplitudes of the slow component with GC concentration.
The TA spectra of PFN in the presence of 0.05 and 0.34 M DCB recorded after photoexcitation at 400 nm are shown in Figure 5B,C [
1]. The TA spectra of PFN in the absence of DCB are also represented for comparison. The features of the TA spectra are similar to those in the case of PFN/GC systems, where TA spectra show the GSB at 410 nm, SE at 450 nm, and broad ESA at 580 nm. Importantly, the peaks of the spectra are slightly blue shifted upon DCB additions, and they are further blue shifted at longer time delays. The blue shift is most probably due to the spectral overlap between the GSB, SE, and broad ESA bands and the new emerging bands in the range 420-620 nm with two peaks clearly observed at 370 and 600 nm at long time delays. The two emerging bands are the spectroscopic signatures of PFN
+•-DCB
-• radical ion pairs as the result of the PET from the excited PFN to DCB.
Due to the spectral overlapping, the time constants of the PET cannot be extracted accurately from the TA spectra. Nevertheless, the kinetics of absorption at 410 nm (
Figure 4) reveal that the GSB recovery data follow a single exponential function with a time constant in a few hundred ps time scales related to the relaxation of free or uncomplexed PFN, as mentioned above. In comparison, the GSB recovery of PFN alone is more efficient than that in the presences of DCB, suggesting that DCB induces lower GSB recovery [
1]. More importantly, as shown in
Figure 4, the kinetics of absorption at 410 nm indicates that the percentage of unrecovered GSB and, accordingly, amount of the long-lived PFN
+• radical cations are increased with DCB addition. These findings again support clearly the PET from the excited PFN to DCB. Given that the PFN
+•-DCB
-• radical ion pairs are long-lived and the CR is slow (in 7.09 ns time scales).
From previous work [
1], it was presumed that PFN
+• and DCB
-• may form separated radical ion pairs through CS process, as it is observed in the case of perylene/DCB system as well (1.3 ns). [
1,
26]
The absence of ultrafast dynamics in photoexcitation of PFN/DCB system was consistent with the results of steady state fluorescence quenching the DCB concentration-dependent fluorescence lifetime [
1], which suggest that the quenching occurs through dynamic interactions. In order to evaluate the time constants of the PET process from the excited PFN to nature DCB, the rate of PET fluorescence lifetime was extracted by fitting with a single exponential decay function. From the fluorescence lifetimes of PFN in the absence and presence of 0.24 M DCB, being 3.58 and 30.14 ns, respectively [
1], the rate of PET was estimated to be ≈2×10
-2 s
-1. This rate is much slower than that the PET from excited perylene to DCB (in 250 ps), [
1,
26] and it is also slower than on PFN to GC (within 0.012 ps), the diffusion rate of typical small molecules such as DCB (in the order of 10
9 s
-1M
-1), supporting the suggested diffusion-controlled PET process.
Finally, it is noteworthy that the PET events are the reduction of the strong electron acceptor moieties by PFN. This can be considered that PET events are facilitated by the energy-level alignment between the PFN and GC to induce favorable energetics for the charge transfer process. However it is important to note that although the reduction potential of GC (-1.02 V vs. SCE) [
34] is lower than that DCB (-1.64 V vs. SCE), [
35] relating to smaller driving force from PFN to GC, the PET from PFN to GC is much faster than that from PFN to DCB and this is due to the opposite charge on GC to achieve strong electrostatic interactions, enhancing the electronic coupling and the rate of the PET process between PFN and GC because of a close distance of the electron donor and acceptor. [
16] By the electrostatic interactions, one thus can control over the rate of the ultrafast PET in the non-covalent associations of the cationic polyfluorene.