1. Introduction
Obesity is a pathology characterized by excess adipose tissue and metabolic alterations such as dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance [
1]. One of the main causes of obesity is excessive consumption of fats and sugars [
2,
3]. It is also known that excessive consumption of fructose and saturated fats modifies the synthesis of metabolites in the colon by the intestinal microbiota [
4].
Furthermore, lipid intake stimulates the synthesis of pro-inflammatory metabolites such as indoxyl sulfuric, arachidonic, and stearic acids in the colon which promote intestinal permeability by inhibiting the action of tight junction proteins. This inhibition promotes intestinal permeability and allows the passage of toxin-producing bacteria, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), from the intestinal lumen into the systemic circulation, reaching organs such as the liver and brain and promoting inflammation characterized in part by the increase of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-2 [
4,
5].
In previous studies in murine animals, it has been reported that the type of macronutrients that make up the diet affects intestinal adaptation. Increasing intake favors cell proliferation, the length of the villi, and the depth of the crypts; while nutrient deficiency generates the opposite[
6,
7]. Specifically, it has been reported that the consumption of saturated fats in mice increases the length of the villi, which in turn favors the surface area for nutrient absorption. [
6].
Previously, a relationship between consuming that include fats and sugars has been associated with diets and developing alterations in intestinal integrity has been suggested [
8]. On the other hand, there are diets that have been related to their health benefits. The WHO recommends the daily intake of 400 g of vegetables, including legumes as part of a healthy diet, since they are the main source of fiber and phytochemical compounds in the diet; in addition, it provides vitamins and minerals [
9].
Beans are one of the most produced plants in Mexico. From the harvest of the seeds that are part of the basic diet of the population, the leaves that are mostly obtained are discarded [
10]. However, some rural populations consume this part of the plant that is classified as “quelites” or edible plants [
11]. These quelites contain 24.20% crude protein and 24.10% total dietary fiber and a minimum contribution of lipids [
12]. Likewise, bean leaves are a source of iron (1.65 mg/g) and phytochemical compounds such as total phenols (2 459 mg/100g), soluble phenols (474 mg/100g) and flavonoids (949 mg/100g) [
12,
13].
The nutraceutical properties of its leaves have been scarcely investigated. Until now, it has been reported that the consumption of common bean leaves (
Phaseolus vulgaris L.) prevents the development of obesity in rats fed with HFFD, since it reduces weight gain (12%), the abdominal fat accumulation (10%) and early insulin resistance (6%). Interestingly, the improvement of metabolic alterations is related to the higher concentration of SCFAs (54%) in the cecal content p < 0.05 [
12]. In another study, supplementation with bean leaves (
Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of the Eugenia variety for 13 weeks prevented hepatic lipotoxicity in rats fed HFFD [
14].
With the above, it is suggested a strategy to decreased obesity is by improving intestinal integrity. Bean leaves have been recommended for the prevention of obesity. However, its effect as a treatment and relationship with the improvement of intestinal integrity is unknown. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine the effect of bean leaves ingestion as a treatment on metabolic complications and intestinal integrity in C57BL/6 mice with obesity induced by a high-fat, high-fructose diet.
4. Discussion
Bean leaves are a food source of bioactive compounds. Thus, in this study, we confirmed that bean leaves contain dietary fiber, mainly insoluble fiber, and are a source of phenols, flavonoids, and tannins. Furthermore, for the first time, we report the saponin content in bean leaves. Bioactive compounds are mainly metabolized by colonic microbiota, which synthesizes metabolites with potentially beneficial effects related to the maintenance of intestinal integrity [
29]. The concentration of flavonoids in BL was similar to that reported in a previous study in the pinto villa variety [
13]. Furthermore, our results are similar to those of Becerril-Campos (2022) who demonstrated that in rats with HFFD-induced obesity, 10% bean leaves prevented the development of obesity and increased the total SCFA concentration in the cecal contents [
12].
Furthermore, the presence of phenolic acids was identified, among which coumaric acid stands out. Previously, administration of coumaric acid (10 mg/kg) in mice fed a high-fat diet was shown to decrease the amount of adipose tissue, adipocyte size, and leptin concentrations [
30]. The proposed mechanism of action of coumaric acid is from the inhibition of the expression of genes in white adipose tissue; it also promotes the hepatic oxidation of fatty acids [
30]. Meanwhile, among the flavonoids identified in BL, quercetin and kaempferol stand out, which have been shown to reduce the metabolic alterations of obesity. Administration of quercetin (0.05%) in a high-fat diet was able to decrease the transcription of proinflammatory cytokines in mice [
31]. Meanwhile, kaempferol has been used in various studies in murine with high-fat diets, demonstrating that at doses between 10 to 200 mg/kg body weight, it can reduce body weight, serum concentrations of glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides, and the accumulation of adipose tissue [
32,
33,
34]. When comparing the nutritional composition of bean leaves with the most consumed quelites such as quintonil (17.5 to 20.3% of proteins and 2.6% of crude fiber) quelite cenizo (4% of protein in fresh weight and flavonoids 3935 mg/g of extract) and purslane (total phenols 9.12 mg/g and total flavonoids 1.44 mg/g in dry weight) [
35], bean leaves prove to be a competitive alternative with these quelites to be included in the diet.
In this study, the presence of tannins was also reported. Tannins are hydrolyzed into gallic acid, pyrogallol and phloroglucinol, which are precursors to acetate and butyrate. Also, urolithins are one of the main metabolites derived from tannins; More importantly, both urolithin A and urolithin B have been shown to be related to the prevention of obesity in rats fed a high-fat diet by reducing lipid accumulation in the liver and increasing lipid and fecal excretion [
36,
37]. With the above, the intake of bean leaves that contain fiber, phenolic compounds, saponins and tannins could be part of a healthy diet.
In relation to the model used to evaluate the effect of BL consumption as a treatment for obesity, animal models with obesity induced with diets rich in fat and fructose have been successfully reported to evaluate various intervention strategies. In this sense, the induction of obesity was demonstrated with the ingestion of a diet with fructose (20%) and lard (40%) for 14 weeks, characterized by a 10% overweight with respect to the body weight of the animals fed with SD. Likewise, animals fed HFFD presented greater abdominal circumference, greater accumulation of adipose tissue and increased serum levels of glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides when compared to the SD group. In addition to the above, average food consumption (g/day) was positively correlated with energy consumption (r = 0.749). These changes were attributed to excess fat that provides greater energy density which promotes body weight gain (r = 0.290), VAT (r = 0.457) and SCAT (r = 0.473). Meanwhile, it has been shown that the addition of fructose to the diet can exacerbate the metabolic alterations of obesity [
38]. In previous studies, it has been confirmed that high-fat diets favor the development of obesity in a short time, while persistent intake of fructose favors the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver [
39,
40,
41]. Therefore, the combination of lard and fructose in a high-calorie diet aggravates metabolic complications.
Regarding the effect of BL consumption on body composition and lipid profile, body weight did not decrease. However, the accumulation of VAT and SCAT, as well as serum triglycerides, was inhibited. Meanwhile, a change to a healthy diet reduced abdominal circumference and decreased serum triglyceride concentrations.
Increased abdominal circumference has been considered an independent predictor of morbidity, associated with greater accumulation of VAT [
42]. This increase in adipose tissue can promote chronic low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk [
43]. Interestingly, the reduction in adipose tissue due to BL consumption can be attributed to the contribution of phenolic compounds (r = - 0.451).
It was previously reported that the consumption of bean leaves in rats on an obesogenic diet prevents weight gain and the amount of adipose tissue without decreasing energy consumption [
12,
14].
In this study, body weight was negatively correlated with total phenol consumption (r = - 0.306) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT, r = - 0.452). It was shown that despite not decreasing body weight, BL consumption decreases adipose tissue accumulation and serum triglyceride concentrations in animals fed HFFD. It is relevant for future research to evaluate changes in other body compartments such as muscle mass, water content and bone tissue to understand why there is no difference in body weight.
The increase in triglycerides and their accumulation is considered a risk factor for the development of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [
44]. In this study, BL intake and switching to a healthy diet decreased serum triglyceride concentrations that were previously increased with HFFD. Previous studies evaluated the preventive effect of consuming cooked bean seeds of different varieties (60% of the diet) and bean pod extract (300 mg/kg body weight) in obesogenic models, which decreased serum triglycerides, which was combined with a protective effect on the development of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [
45,
46]. In this study we co-tested the treatment effect of BL consumption on hypertriglyceridemia.
The above could be due in part to the increase in the excretion of lipids and triglycerides in feces partially due to the inhibition of pancreatic lipase since the in vitro assay showed an enzymatic inhibition of 29%. The above is of great relevance since pancreatic lipase is released in the small intestine to break down fats along with bile salts so that they can be absorbed [
47]. Previous studies in murine models have shown that in vitro inhibition of pancreatic lipase in proportions similar to those in this study is closely related to the reduction of metabolic alterations of obesity [
47,
48].
As part of the effect of BL treatment on intestinal integrity, changes in the length and weight of the small intestine and colon were evaluated. Previously, it was reported that diets high in fat (greater than 30%) and sugar promote alterations in intestinal integrity[
49,
50,
51]. In this study, the small intestine and colon of animals fed HFFD had a lower relative weight, which was not recovered with BL consumption or the change to a healthy diet. Previously, in mice fed a high-fat diet, it has been reported that decreased intestinal length and weight are associated with intestinal inflammation that could exacerbate intestinal permeability [
26].
In addition to the above, histopathological changes in regions of the small intestine and colon related to alterations in intestinal integrity were analyzed. In the jejunum of the HFFD-fed group, increased lymphocytic infiltration and hyperplasia will be observed in parallel with a decrease in colonic length and an increase in circulating IL-6. Meanwhile, treatment with 10% BL restored the villi and no lymphocyte infiltration was observed, which could be related to less inflammation [
52]. Interestingly, 75% of the jejunum portions and 80% of the colon portions of animals consuming 10% BL showed no histopathological changes, suggesting a beneficial effect against intestinal inflammation.
It was previously described that villous atrophy is associated with lower nutrient absorption, as in the case of this study, in the healthy diet change group. The alterations in colon and jejunum histologies induced by the consumption of HFFD for 14 weeks were restored with the consumption of 10% BL, protecting against potential intestinal inflammation.
HFFD intake promotes intestinal permeability and metabolic endotoxemia that decreases both with BL consumption and with the change to a healthy diet. In this study, the increase in serum FITC-dextran concentration associated with intestinal permeability was demonstrated. While, the change to a healthy diet and the consumption of BL reduced the levels of LPS and IL-6 in sleep. Regarding the development of metabolic endotoxemia, HFFD consumption was found to increase serum concentrations of LPS and IL-6 (r = 0.98 and r = 0.99, respectively). In contrast, switching to a healthy diet was negatively correlated with serum LPS and IL-6 concentrations (r = -0.885 and r = -0.996, respectively). Furthermore, BL consumption decreased serum LPS concentrations and was inversely correlated with serum IL-6 concentration (r = -0.806). It should be noted that in this study the serum concentration of IL-6 decreased 4.4 times with the consumption of bean leaves, which is related to less systemic inflammation [
41].
Metabolic endotoxemia increases due to alterations in intestinal integrity that allow bacterial translocation and this has been linked to an increase in low-grade systemic inflammation [
53]. Supplementation with microbiota-accessible carbohydrates (15%) for 15 weeks has been reported to improve intestinal eubiosis by decreasing metabolic endotoxemia caused by a high-fat, low-fiber diet in mice [
26]. It has also been reported that the inclusion in the diet of foods rich in fiber such as cereals, vegetables and various legumes has been related to the improvement of the intestinal microbiota and the decrease in systemic inflammation with lower concentrations of LPS and IL-6 in circulation [
39,
54,
55]. With the above, the consumption of bean leaves not only reduces the complications of obesity but also reduces intestinal permeability and metabolic endotoxemia.
Finally, the gastrointestinal tract, in addition to digesting and absorbing nutrients, also protects against pathogenic infections and exerts an immune function. An unhealthy diet high in fat and sugar decreases microbial diversity, causing leaky gut and chronic inflammation; On the other hand, a nutritionally balanced diet is essential to maintain a healthy intestinal microbiome, intestinal barrier integrity, immune tolerance and normal intestinal physiology [
56].
Until now we demonstrated the role of consuming bean leaves as a treatment for obesity and the decrease in permeability and metabolic endotoxemia. However, in future research the analysis of the intestinal microbiota, its metabolites and the association with the reduction of obesity and inflammation from consumption.
Figure 1.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to healthy diet on adipose tissue in mice with induced-obesity. a) Total adipose tissue (images from magnetic resonance analysis); visceral adipose tissue (VAT, red) and subcutaneous adipose tissues (SCAT, blue), b) visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume, and c) subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) volume. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, Change to a healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet.
Figure 1.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to healthy diet on adipose tissue in mice with induced-obesity. a) Total adipose tissue (images from magnetic resonance analysis); visceral adipose tissue (VAT, red) and subcutaneous adipose tissues (SCAT, blue), b) visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume, and c) subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) volume. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, Change to a healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet.
Figure 2.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to healthy diet on a) total lipids in feces, b) triglycerides in feces and c) inhibition of pancreatic lipase. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, Change to a healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet. Orlistat = positive control of enzyme inhibition. BL extract = bean leaves methanolic extract.
Figure 2.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to healthy diet on a) total lipids in feces, b) triglycerides in feces and c) inhibition of pancreatic lipase. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, Change to a healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet. Orlistat = positive control of enzyme inhibition. BL extract = bean leaves methanolic extract.
Figure 3.
Effect of bean leaves consumption on the histopathology of jejunum and colon (n = 3-5). Micrographs of colon and jejunum tissue fragment were stained with H&E and analyzed with the 10X objective. BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, Change to a healthy diet = consumption of SD in animals with obesity, SD = standard diet. The black arrows indicate the altered structures identified by histopathological analysis.
Figure 3.
Effect of bean leaves consumption on the histopathology of jejunum and colon (n = 3-5). Micrographs of colon and jejunum tissue fragment were stained with H&E and analyzed with the 10X objective. BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, Change to a healthy diet = consumption of SD in animals with obesity, SD = standard diet. The black arrows indicate the altered structures identified by histopathological analysis.
Figure 4.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on intestinal permeability. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + bean leaves, Change to a healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet.
Figure 4.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on intestinal permeability. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + bean leaves, Change to a healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet.
Figure 5.
Effect of bean leaves and on metabolic endotoxemia and inflammation. a) LPS concentration and b) IL-6 concentration. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters (treatment period) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, Change to healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet.
Figure 5.
Effect of bean leaves and on metabolic endotoxemia and inflammation. a) LPS concentration and b) IL-6 concentration. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n ≤ 3). Different letters (treatment period) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). BL consumption = HFFD + 10% bean leaves, Change to healthy diet = SD after obesity induction phase, HFFD = high fat and fructose diet, SD = standard diet.
Table 1.
Experimental groups and nutritional content of standard diet (SD) and high fat-high fructose diet (HFFD).
Table 1.
Experimental groups and nutritional content of standard diet (SD) and high fat-high fructose diet (HFFD).
|
Energy (kcal/g)
|
Proteins (%) |
Carbohydrates (%) |
Lipids (%) |
Crude fiber (g /100 g) |
Total dietary fiber (g/100 g) |
Fructose (%) |
Lard (%) |
Total phenolic compounds (mg/g) |
SD |
3.40 |
28.54 |
58.15 |
13.43 |
5.10 |
36.92 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
2.53 |
HFFD |
4.70 |
14.28 |
40.90 |
44.81 |
3.07 |
17.31 |
19.98 |
40.17 |
1.55 |
BL consumption |
4.70 |
13.79 |
41.20 |
45.02 |
3.16 |
21.00 |
20.26 |
40.73 |
3.26 |
Table 2.
Groups and diets of the experimental treatment phase after obesity induction.
Table 2.
Groups and diets of the experimental treatment phase after obesity induction.
Group |
Diet |
SD 26-wk |
Standard diet by 26 weeks |
HFFD 26-wk |
HFFD by 26 weeks |
BL consumption |
HFFD + 10% BL by 12 weeks |
Change healthy diet |
Standard diet by 12 week |
Table 3.
Quantification of phenolics and flavonoids in bean leaves by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Table 3.
Quantification of phenolics and flavonoids in bean leaves by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Compounds |
µg/g |
Phenolic acids |
Quinic acid |
97.44 ± 7.08 |
Caffeic acid (derivative) |
57.14 ± 3.95 |
Cinnamic acid (derivative) |
72.41 ± 13.00 |
Protocatechoic acid |
8.31 ± 2.17 |
Caftaric acid |
207.21 ± 22.20 |
4-hydroxybenzoic acid |
106.59 ± 2.18 |
Coumaric acid (derivative) |
1283.81 ± 110.87 |
Ferulic acid (derivative) |
95.53 ± 11.82 |
2-hydroxybenzoic acid |
96.76 ± 10.79 |
Benzoic acid |
49.55 ± 0.54 |
Flavonoids |
Rutin |
971.18 ± 73.19 |
Quercetin 3-O-ß-glucuronide |
6892.20 ± 99.42 |
Quercetin 3-O-glucoside |
73.05 ± 7.53 |
Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside |
11.24 ± 0.10 |
Naringin |
1.01 ± 0.36 |
Naringenin |
2.29 ± 0.61 |
Table 4.
Influence of the addition of bean leaves and the change to a healthy diet on food and water consumption in mice with induced obesity.
Table 4.
Influence of the addition of bean leaves and the change to a healthy diet on food and water consumption in mice with induced obesity.
|
Obesity induction phase |
Experimental treatment phase |
|
SD 14 wk |
HFFD 14 wk |
SD 26 wk |
HFFD 26 wk |
BL consumption |
Change to healthy diet |
Food intake (g/day) |
4.59 ± 0.50 |
4.88 ± 0.30 |
3.79 ± 0.40a
|
5.13 ± 0.80a
|
4.54 ± 0.60a
|
5.09 ± 0.50a
|
Energy intake (Kcal/day) |
15.75 ± 1.50 |
22.94 ± 1.30* |
12.89 ± 1.50a
|
23.48 ± 3.80b
|
20.80 ± 2.70b
|
17.11 ± 1.50a
|
Water intake (mL/day) |
4.62 ± 0.50 |
4.92 ± 0.40 |
5.05 ± 0.40a
|
5.61 ± 0.50a
|
4.90 ± 0.70a
|
6.10 ± 0.80a
|
Table 5.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on body parameters and lipid profile of mice with induced-obesity.
Table 5.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on body parameters and lipid profile of mice with induced-obesity.
|
Obesity induction phase |
Experimental treatment phase |
|
SD 14-wk |
HFFD 14-wk |
SD 26-wk |
HFFD 26-wk |
BL consumption |
Change to healthy diet |
Body weight (g) |
25.63 ± 0.57 |
33.47 ± 0.72 * |
27.96 ± 0.65a
|
30.50 ± 0.52b
|
28.09 ± 0.84ab
|
29.47 ± 0.42a
|
Abdominal circumference (cm) |
7.50 ± 0.46 |
10.40 ± 0.43* |
7.79 ± 0.29a
|
8.33 ± 0.28a
|
8.50 ± 0.39a
|
6.83 ± 0.17b
|
Thoracic circumference (cm) |
7.13 ± 0.43 |
9.2 ± 0.73 |
7.36 ± 0.26ª |
8.17 ± 0.25ª |
8.50 ± 0.55ª |
7.33 ± 0.33ª |
Serum cholesterol (mg/dL) |
92.60 ± 8.60 |
122.80 ± 11.90* |
98.30 ± 0.90a
|
119.70 ± 3.40b
|
114.40 ± 3.50b
|
104.90 ± 4.20b
|
Serum triglycerides (mg/dL) |
77.70 ± 7.60 |
137.30 ± 17.50* |
99.50 ± 3.90a
|
141.10 ± 4.20b
|
110.70 ± 7.30a
|
106.80 ± 7.70a
|
Table 6.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on small intestine and colon length as an indicator of intestinal inflammation.
Table 6.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on small intestine and colon length as an indicator of intestinal inflammation.
|
Obesity induction phase |
Experimental treatment phase |
Length (cm) |
SD 14-wk |
HFFD 14-wk |
SD 26-wk |
HFFD 26-wk |
BL consumption |
Change to healthy diet |
Small intestine |
44.00 ± 2.91 |
36.63 ± 1.58* |
39.85 ± 1.72a |
34.31 ± 0.97a |
37.95 ± 1.04a |
37.24 ± 1.67a |
Total colon |
8.86 ± 0.50 |
6.98 ± 0.50 |
7.28 ± 0.45a |
6.58 ± 0.52a |
7.41±0.48a |
5.43 ± 0.53b |
Table 7.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on the relative organ weight after treatment.
Table 7.
Effect of bean leaves consumption and change to a healthy diet on the relative organ weight after treatment.
Percentage (%) |
SD 26-wk |
HFFD 26-wk |
BL consumption |
Change to healthy diet |
Colon |
1.82 ± 0.06a
|
1.23 ± 0.03b
|
1.24 ± 0.02b
|
1.31 ± 0.09b
|
Small intestine |
7.06 ± 0.28a
|
5.77 ± 0.27b
|
6.25 ± 0.14ab
|
6.09 ± 0.14b
|
Liver |
4.81 ± 0.14a
|
5.93 ± 0.28ab
|
5.58 ± 0.59a
|
4.68 ± 0.21ac
|
Table 8.
The consumption of bean leaves and the change to a healthy diet increases the fiber intake through the diet.
Table 8.
The consumption of bean leaves and the change to a healthy diet increases the fiber intake through the diet.
Intake (g/day) |
SD 26-wk |
HFFD 26-wk |
BL consumption |
Change to healthy diet |
Soluble fiber |
0.21 ± 0.02a
|
0.08 ± 0.01b
|
0.24 ± 0.03a
|
0.33 ± 0.04a
|
Insoluble fiber |
0.81 ± 0.08a
|
0.23 ± 0.02b
|
0.70 ± 0.09a
|
1.08 ± 0.13a
|
Total dietary fiber |
1.20 ± 0.10a
|
0.27 ± 0.02b
|
0.94 ± 0.02c
|
1.40 ± 0.16d
|
Total phenolic compounds |
9.59 ± 1.02a
|
7.95 ± 1.24a
|
14.8 ± 2.72b
|
12.87 ± 1.27b
|