1. Introduction
Immunity is the essential process for health and human life. Especially, innate immunity protects human body against invading pathogens such as bacteria, virus, and fungus. Inflammation, which is classically known to consist of redness, swelling, heat, pain, and loss of function, is the initial host defense reaction against pathogenic infection [
1]. But the uncontrolled inflammation is dangerous to host survival [
2] and excessive inflammation sometimes leads to not only acute inflammatory diseases but also chronic inflammatory disorders [
3]. P38 MAPK controls macrophage plasticity via promoting the endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), unfolded protein responses, and glucose intolerance in the infected host [
4]. Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease [
5] and it is well known that cytokines and chemokines might contribute to the exacerbation of atherosclerosis [
5,
6]. Thus, the regulation of inflammation has become more and more important for treating inflammatory diseases [
7]. Representative cytokines related to inflammatory diseases include interleukin-6 (IL-6). Not only cytokines but also nitric oxide (NO) are important factors involved in the inflammatory response process of macrophages [
8]. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is also an important cytokine associated with endotoxemia [
9]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin) can stimulate immune cells like macrophages, which produce cytokines and hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2). Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is also one of increased chemokines in endotoxemia. Excessive cytokines in infectious diseases might have a serious outcome in patients. Thus, LPS-induced macrophages is regarded as being useful to study the anti-inflammatory effect of potential therapeutic agents. TNF-α-converting enzyme (TACE) is a sheddase responsible for cleaving membrane TNF and reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediate LPS-induced up-regulation of TACE activity via P38 MAPK activation in monocytes [
10]. Many studies reported that ERS-related pathways including C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) might be up-regulated through P38 MAPK phosphorylation, which is related with growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene 34 (GADD34) [
11,
12,
13,
14]. CHOP activation is also linked to X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1). Recently, macrophage inflammatory proteins (MIPs) have been recognized as important in the amplification process of inflammatory phenomena. Interferon inducible protein (IP)-10 is also increased in inflammation. In addition, it is known that not only cytokines and chemokines but also growth factors such as increase in blood levels in inflammatory diseases and worsen the condition.
Geniposide is a major ingredient in the herb gardenia [
13]. The herb gardenia, a fruit of
Gardenia jasminoides, is widely used in Asia such as Korea, China, India, Japan, Vietnam, Taiwan, and Myanmar to care for inflammatory disorders [
15,
16,
17]. Geniposide is known to suppress inducible nitric oxide synthase and in macrophages provoked by LPS as well as cyclooxygenase-2 [
16]. Cyclooxygenase-2 is also reduced by geniposide in macrophages. Cheng et al. suggested geniposide inhibits cytokines levels in RAW 264.7 induced by LPS as well as reduced the plaque size and serum TNF-α level in ApoE
-/- mice via microRNA-101/ mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1/ P38 signaling [
18]. Geniposide was reported to reduce atherosclerotic plaques in rabbits via MAPK pathway [
19]. Despite such studies, effects of geniposide on ERS-related cytokine production of LPS-provoked macrophages are still unknown.
Figure 1.
Structural formula of geniposide.
Figure 1.
Structural formula of geniposide.
In this study, effects of geniposide on cytokines, H2O2, and NO in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7. In addition, quantitative PCR was carried out to measure mRNA expressions of ERS-related genes such as Chop, Janus kinase 2 (Jak2), first apoptosis signal receptor (Fas), c-Jun, c-Fos, Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (Stat)-1, Stat-3, nitric oxide synthase 2 (Nos2), cyclooxygenase-2 (Ptgs2), Gadd34, Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (Asc), Xbp1, Nlrp3 (cryopyrin), and Par-2 in RAW 264.7. Finally, geniposide has been shown to suppress levels of cytokines, H2O2, and NO in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7 through calcium-P38 MAPK signaling.
4. Discussion
Research on natural products for treating various inflammatory diseases continues [
21]. Geniposide is a major constituent of the herb gardenia, which is known to treat inflammatory disorder, fever, hypertension, edema, jaundice, and dysphoria for centuries [
13,
14,
22]. Since geniposide is a major component of gardenia, if the inhibitory effect of geniposide on infectious inflammatory reactions is revealed in more detail, it will help develop anti-inflammatory substances using gardenia or develop new treatments to prevent worsening inflammatory diseases caused by infection.
Shi et al. have already reported that geniposide inhibits nitric oxide synthase in LPS-provoked macrophages as well as cyclooxygenase-2 [
14]. Interesting reports have been made about anti-asthmatic property of geniposide [
23], anti-tumor activity of geniposide [
24], anti-angiogenic activity of the herb gardenia [
25], and anti-inflammatory activity of geniposide in oxygen/glucose-deprived rat microglial cells [
26]. Liu et al. have reported that geniposide inhibits IL-6 and IL-8 production in LPS-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells by blocking the P38 and ERK 1/2 signaling [
27]. But the complete mechanism for bioactivity of geniposide still remains unresolved.
LPS can stimulate immune cells like macrophages to secrete various inflammatory factors including NO, cytokines, prostaglandins, and reactive oxygen species. Excessive production of inflammatory mediators in infectious diseases might have a serious outcome in patients. The production of large amounts of inflammatory factors from activated macrophages is associated with exacerbation of sepsis [
14,
28]. Thus, LPS-provoked macrophages is regarded as being useful to search a new anti-inflammatory agent.
Although many studies for evaluating pharmacological activities of geniposide have been reported, effects of geniposide on cytokines secreted from LPS-provoked macrophages have not been fully reported till now. Therefore, effects of geniposide on ERS-related cytokine production in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7 was investigated in this study.
The uncontrolled inflammation can develop into acute inflammatory diseases and further chronic inflammatory diseases such as diabetes [
29]. Sepsis is a representative disease concerned with the uncontrolled inflammation and the hyper-inflammatory response (cytokine storm). Hu et al. have reported that sepsis is a systemic response that results from a harmful host response to infection [
30].
Sun and Bhatia reported that MIP-1α, MCP-1, and MIP-2 are elevated after acute pancreatitis induced by cerulein in mouse model and they also suggested that MIP-1α, MCP-1, and MIP-2 have a role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis [
31]. IL-6, an important factor of B-cell maturation and autoantibody production, induces the articular and systemic symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis [
32]. MCP-1 is hypersecreted in airway hyper reactivity and chronic airway inflammatory diseases such as asthma [
33]. The exaggerated allergic inflammation with the airway hyper-responsiveness can be accompanied by an increase in G-CSF and KC [
34]. GM-CSF and IL-5 have clinical importance in the pathophysiology of allergy and asthma [
35]. During lung inflammation, levels of MCP-1, IP-10, G-CSF, and GM-CSF are increased in bronchoalveolar fluid [
36]. In the current study, geniposide at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 μM meaningfully suppressed the production of IL-6, G-CSF, MCP-1 and MIP-1α in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 and geniposide at concentrations of 25 and 50 μM meaningfully suppressed levels of TNF-alpha, IP-10, GM-CSF, and MIP-1β. These experimental results mean that various hyper-inflammatory phenomena caused by endotoxins can be alleviated by geniposide. More research will be needed on which inflammatory diseases geniposide will have a valid effect.
Interestingly, the current data showed that geniposide significantly inhibits levels of intracellular Ca
2+, NO, and hydrogen peroxide in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7; geniposide decreased significantly the transcription of
Chop,
Jak2,
Fas,
c-Jun,
c-Fos,
Stat-3,
Nos2,
Ptgs2,
Gadd34,
Asc,
Xbp1,
Nlrp3, and
Par-2 genes as well as P38 MAPK phosphorylation. LPS stimulation is well known to makes RAW 264.7 produce cytokines and ROS via P38 MAPK activation [
37]. Because ROS-mediate up-regulation of TACE activity in LPS-stimulated monocytes might be progressed via P38 MAPK activation [
10], inhibitory effects of geniposide on ROS production and expressions of ERS-related genes in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 could be interpreted as that geniposide inhibits cytokine production, such as TNF-α and MCP-1, through regulation of ERS-related P38 signaling (
Figure 8).
CHOP (GADD153) in stressed cells turns out to be activated by P38 MAPK [
38]. LPS causes an ERS with the overexpression of
Chop [
39]. During inflammation, a characteristic phenomenon occurs in which intracellular calcium concentration increases while ER calcium storage decreases [
40]. CHOP-amplified cytoplasmic calcium is known to activate ROS generation via
Camk2a activation [
41]. ERS-induced calcium release might be related with
Camk2a and Stat1 activation in macrophages [
42]. As well as CHOP, GADD34 [
11,
12], XBP1 [
13], and PAR-2 [
14] might also be up-regulated through P38 MAPK phosphorylation in ERS reaction [
11,
12,
13,
14]. Asc and Nlrp3 play an important role in the inflammasome complex activation caused by infectious pathogen and in infection-induced macrophage activation [
43]. Interestingly, the induction of the ASC and Nlrp3 inflammasome plays an intermediate role in a series of inflammatory cascade from ERS to pyroptosis, which begins with ROS production and subsequently results in cellular injury [
44]. In this study, it was not possible to determine whether XBP1 directly activates the transcription factor activity of CHOP. Since oxidative stress and ERS can cause each other, additional investigation is needed to determine whether geniposide suppresses ERS through regulation of oxidative stress, or whether it suppresses oxidative stress through regulation of ERS. These results mean that geniposide could modulate M1-type polarization in LPS-stimulated macrophages, which might be induced with ERS in the bacterial infection [
45]. Further studies need to verify effects of geniposide on the conversion of M1 to M2 macrophages. Finally, geniposide significantly inhibited levels of NO, ROS, IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 via calcium-P38 MAPK pathway. The shortfall of this study was the inability to use primary macrophages. Another shortcoming of this study is the inability to confirm protein levels such as CHOP, STAT-3, PTGS2, NOS2, GADD34, XBP1, PAR-2, Asc, and Nlrp3 as well as the phosphorylation of STATs. More research is needed to elucidate the medicinal benefits of geniposide for inflammatory disorders.
5. Conclusions
Geniposide significantly inhibited levels of Ca2+, NO, H2O2, IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and phosphorylated P38 MAPK as well as mRNA expressions of Chop, Jak2, Fas, c-Jun, c-Fos, Stat3, Nos2, Ptgs2, Gadd34, Asc, Xbp1, Nlrp3, and Par-2. in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7, which means that anti-inflammatory activity of geniposide in macrophages takes place through calcium-P38 MAPK signaling pathway.
Figure 2.
Effect of geniposide on cell viability for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n=9). Significant differences were examined using Kruskal-Wallis test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor.
Figure 2.
Effect of geniposide on cell viability for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n=9). Significant differences were examined using Kruskal-Wallis test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor.
Figure 3.
Effect of geniposide on hydrogen peroxide production for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 as well as NO production for 24 h treatment (C) and calcium release for 18 h treatment (D). Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 3.
Effect of geniposide on hydrogen peroxide production for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 as well as NO production for 24 h treatment (C) and calcium release for 18 h treatment (D). Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 4.
Effect of geniposide on the production of IL-6 (A), TNF-α (B), G-CSF (C), GM-CSF (D), IP-10 (E), MCP-1 (F), MIP-1α (G), MIP-1β (H), MIP-2 (I), and LIX (J) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 4.
Effect of geniposide on the production of IL-6 (A), TNF-α (B), G-CSF (C), GM-CSF (D), IP-10 (E), MCP-1 (F), MIP-1α (G), MIP-1β (H), MIP-2 (I), and LIX (J) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 5.
Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Chop (A), Jak2 (B), Fas (C), c-Jun (D), c-Fos (E), and Stat-1 (F) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 5.
Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Chop (A), Jak2 (B), Fas (C), c-Jun (D), c-Fos (E), and Stat-1 (F) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 6.
Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Nos2 (A), Ptgs2 (B), Gadd34 (C), Asc (D), Xbp1 (E), Stat-3 (F), Nlrp3 (G), and Par-2 (H) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor means the normal group treated with media only. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 6.
Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Nos2 (A), Ptgs2 (B), Gadd34 (C), Asc (D), Xbp1 (E), Stat-3 (F), Nlrp3 (G), and Par-2 (H) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor means the normal group treated with media only. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 7.
Effects of geniposide on the level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7. The level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK was measured with Flow Cytometric Analysis. Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone); BA, baicalein (25 µM); p-P38, phosphorylated P38 MAPK. GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con.
Figure 7.
Effects of geniposide on the level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7. The level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK was measured with Flow Cytometric Analysis. Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone); BA, baicalein (25 µM); p-P38, phosphorylated P38 MAPK. GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con.
Figure 8.
A diagram for effects of geniposide on lipopolysaccharide-provoked RAW 264.7 through calcium-P38 MAPK signaling.
Figure 8.
A diagram for effects of geniposide on lipopolysaccharide-provoked RAW 264.7 through calcium-P38 MAPK signaling.