1. Introduction

2. Study Area

Figure 1. (a) Map represents the tectonic settings, different tectonic features, and elements of Bangladesh and surrounding regions with the location of the study area (white rectangular box); (b) zoomed-in view of the part of the Surma Basin focusing the study area, rectangles in the map represent the location of studied sections; (c) map shows the locations of different stream-cut sections along the Shari River including East Bank, West Bank, and Tetulghat sections; (d) map shows the location of Nayagang Section.

Figure 1. (a) Map represents the tectonic settings, different tectonic features, and elements of Bangladesh and surrounding regions with the location of the study area (white rectangular box); (b) zoomed-in view of the part of the Surma Basin focusing the study area, rectangles in the map represent the location of studied sections; (c) map shows the locations of different stream-cut sections along the Shari River including East Bank, West Bank, and Tetulghat sections; (d) map shows the location of Nayagang Section.

3. Regional Geology

3.2. Stratigraphy

The stratigraphy of the Bengal Basin can be divided into two subdivisions one for the stable part and another for the deep basin area. The deep basin part comprises mainly Tertiary to Recent succession and the stable part consists of succession ranging from Precambrian Basement complex to recent deposits [17]. The generalized stratigraphic succession of the deep basin part of Bangladesh is given in Table 1 based on Reimann and Hiller [18], Holtrop and Keiser [16], and Imam [17]. The deep basin consists of more than 20km thick sedimentary succession ranging from the Oligocene to Pleistocene age. In the Surma Basin, the stratigraphic succession begins with the Jaintia Group of Paleocene–Eocene time. The Jaintia Group comprises three formations namely Paleocene–Lower Eocene aged 170–360m thick Tura Sandstone Formation, Middle Eocene aged 250m thick Sylhet Limestone Formation, and Upper Eocene aged 40–90m thick Kopili Shale Formation [15,31]. The Jaintia Group is overlain by the Barail Group of Oligocene age which is 800m to 1600m thick [31,34,46]. The Surma Group in the Surma Basin is unconformably overlies the Barail Group and underlain by the Tipam Sandstone Formation of the Tipam Group [31,34]. The thickness of the Surma Group in the basin ranges from 2700m in the Atgram 1X well to more than 3900m in the Fenchuganj 2 well [c. 60km south of Atgram 1X well; 15]. The Surma Group comprises two formations namely, the lower, Bhuban Formation and the upper, Boka Bil Formation (Table 1). The overlying Tipam Group of about 3500m thickness comprises two formations including the Middle Pliocene-aged Tipam Sandstone Formation and Girujan Clay Formation [15,31,34]. Among the Tertiary stratigraphic units, the Miocene Surma Group deserves special attention because of its hydrocarbon reserve in the Bengal Basin [17].

The Bhuban Formation can be divided into the Upper, Middle, and Lower parts where the Upper and Lower Bhuban are sandier than the Middle Bhuban which is more shally [18]. This formation unconformably overlies the Renji Formation of the Barail Group and is conformably underlain by the Boka Bil Formation with a transitional contact [18]. The Bhuban Formation mainly consists of repetitive sandstones and well-laminated silty shales and siltstones [18]. The sandstones are fine to very fine-grained, bedded to massive-bedded in nature, the siltstones are mostly calcareous, hard, and compact, and the shales are fissile [18]. The formation shows gradational contact with the overlying Boka Bil Formation and the thickness of the formation decreases toward the northeastern margin of the Surma Basin [18].

The Boka Bil Formation is unconformably overlain by the Tipam Formation in the marginal part but conformably in the deeper part and is unconformably overlain by the Dupi Tila Formation in the Atgram Anticlinal area [18]. The formation is more argillaceous in its upper and lower parts and arenaceous in its middle part [18,47]. It consists of shales, sandstones, siltstones, and little conglomerates. The top of the unit is made up of a predominantly shaly sequence, which was designated as the Upper Marine shale equivalent unit [16].

Table 1. Stratigraphic succession of the deep basin part of Bangladesh [16,17,18].

Table 1. Stratigraphic succession of the deep basin part of Bangladesh [16,17,18].

Age	Group	Formation	Thickness (meter)	Rock Types
Pleistocene		Madhupur Clay	30	Reddish clay
Plio-Pleistocene Pliocene	Tipam	Dupitila	2500	Predominantly sandstone with shale and clay beds.
		Girujan Clay	1000	Mainly Shales
		Tipam Sandstone	2500	Predominantly sandstone with minor shale and clay beds.
Mio-Pliocene Miocene	Surma	Upper Marine Shale Boka Bil	1500	Alternating dark-grey shale, sandy shale, and sandstone with minor siltstone.
		Bhuban	3500	Alternating and repetitive sandstone, pebbly sandstone at the top, and sandy shale with minor conglomerate and siltstone at the bottom.
Oligocene	Barail	Renji	700	Predominantly shale with minor shale.
		Jenum	240+	Predominantly shale with minor siltstone and sandstone.
Base not encountered

4. Materials and Methods

4.2. Heterogeneity Analysis

In analyzing the various levels of heterogeneity, we adopted the approach described by Jordan & Pryor [8] and Keogh et al. [7]. According to Jordan & Pryor [8] and Keogh et al. [7], six levels of heterogeneity encompass all reservoir heterogeneity ranging from megascopic to microscopic (Figure 2). Heterogeneity level 1 comprises the entire system and it is the largest unit. It is hundreds of meters thick, tens of kilometers wide, and tens of kilometers long. It is composed of many sand bodies. Floodplain mud acts as a laterally extensive regional barrier to fluids in the system [8]. Heterogeneity level 2 comprises a single sand body within a system. It is generally separated from other sand bodies within the system by clay plugs. It is tens of meters thick and several kilometers wide [8]. Heterogeneity level 3 comprises the channel bar and crevasse-splay sand bodies where the main barriers are thin sheets and lenses of mud. This level is tens of meters thick, hundreds of meters wide, and several kilometers long [8]. Heterogeneity level 4 includes bundles of sequentially stacked bedding units within a bar. Each bundle is separated from overlying and underlying bundles by thick sheets of mud and silt. This unit may be several meters thick and hundreds of meters wide [8]. Heterogeneity level 5 comprises individual beds within a bundle of stacked bedding units. They are cm to meter-scale thick, several meters wide, and tens of kilometers long. Permeable bedding unit is separated by mud or silt layers such as cross-bedded sand units are separated by horizontal and inclined mud or silt layers along the bed-sets boundaries and reactivation surfaces. Low-permeability mud or silt layers impede the vertical and lateral fluid flow. Although their lateral extension is limited they can make the flow path tortuous. Mud layers may be absent in bed boundaries but infiltrated mud and grain size differences make these boundaries flow-barriers [8]. Heterogeneity level 6 comprises individual lamination that constitutes the sand body and is the smallest unit. This horizontal or inclined lamination is a few centimeters thick, a few centimeters to several meters long, and a few centimeters to many meters wide. Laminae are often separated from each other by textural variations and very thin mud laminae. Flow in this level is inter-particle flow [8].

Figure 2. Schematic view of the different scale and type of sand body heterogeneities [after 7,49–52].

Figure 2. Schematic view of the different scale and type of sand body heterogeneities [after 7,49–52].

5. Results

5.1. Facies

5.1.1. Mm- Massive Mudstone

The massive mudstone (Mm) facies is composed of light gray to dark gray colour, structureless mudstone. This facies is present in the middle part of the Surma Group in the Tetulghat Section (Figure 3a, Figure 5 and Figure 10). Individual facies is 30cm to 4m thick. The facies is alternated with irregular sand units such as massive sandstone (Sm) and massive graded sandstone (Smg) facies. It is almost devoid of any silt streaks showing its massive nature in the lower part of the studied succession. This massiveness gradually changes into a heterogeneous nature with the presence of silt streaks and lenticels. The facies is thicker in the lower part of the succession but thickness gradually reduces upward in the stratigraphic succession (Figure 5 and Figure 10).

Mud deposits from settling down of finer sediments including clay and silt from suspension in response to the slowdown of flow energy and reduction of sediment supply [53].

5.1.2. Msl- Mud with Silt Laminae

The mud with silt laminae (Msl) facies is comprised of dark gray coloured mud with light gray coloured frequent silt laminae, streaks, and lenticels (Figure 3b). The facies is present in the lower part of the studied succession in the Tetulghat Section and the upper part of the studied succession in the West Bank Section of Shari River (Figure 5, Figure 8 and Figure 10). Individual laminae are 3mm to 9mm thick. This facies is subjected to soft sediment deformations and different structures developed in the facies such as load structures, convolution, etc. (Figure 3l).

Mud deposits from settling down of finer sediments including clay and silt from suspension in response to the slowdown of flow energy and reduction of sediment supply [53]. The occurrence of silt streaks and lenticels within mud indicates periodic fluctuations of terrigenous sediment input and energy conditions [54].

5.1.3. Sm- Massive Sandstone

The massive sandstone (Sm) facies is composed of light gray to yellowish gray color, medium to fine grain, and structureless sandstone. This facies is observed in the middle part of the Surma Group in the Tetulghat Section (Figure 3c, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 10). Individual beds are 30cm to 40cm thick in the lower part and 15–30cm thick in the middle part of the Tetulghat Section and more than 7m thick in the Nayagang Section (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 9). This facies alternates with massive mudstone (Mm) and lenticular mud (Ml) facies throughout the succession. In the cycle of lithologic alternation, this facies is replaced by normally graded sand units, ripple cross-laminated sand units in the younger direction (Figure 4b and Figure 5).

Massive sandstone is generated in the absence of fluid-flow traction transport, because of sediment gravity flow or rapid sedimentation [53]. It is deposited from hyperpycnal flows generated at the river mouth during individual high-discharge flooding and storms [55].

5.1.4. Smg- Massive Graded Sandstone

The massive graded sandstone (Smg) facies is comprised of light gray to yellowish gray coloured, medium to fine-grained sandstone devoid of any internal sedimentary structure except gradation. It shows a normal grading from medium to fine sand. Individual units are 15cm to 40cm thick. This facies is present in the Middle part of the Surma Group in the Tetulghat Section (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 10). These units occur less frequently in the studied succession in the Tetughat Section and (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 10). The facies alternates with other facies present in the succession such as mud units, and are associated with ripple cross-laminated sandstone (Sr), parallel laminated sandstones (Spl), and massive sandstone (Ms) facies along with interbedded mud facies in the Tetulghat Section (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 10).

The facies is generated by the decelerating flow of sediment-bearing waning storm currents on clastic shelves [56]. Sediments are settled down from a suspension of different-sized sediments according to size [53].

5.1.5. Sr- Ripple Cross-laminated Sandstone

The ripple cross-laminated sandstone (Sr) facies is composed of light gray to yellowish gray coloured, fine-grained sandstone. It comprises asymmetric current and wave ripples. Discontinuous mud laminae and drapes are observed along the top of ripples (Figure 3d). Individual units are 15cm to 40cm thick. This facies is found in association with other facies present in the Middle Surma succession in the Tetulghat Section and the Lower Surma succession in the Nayagang Section (Figure 6, Figure 9 and Figure 10). In some units, the facies is associated with parallel laminated sandstones (Spl) with mud caps that indicate the upper part of the Bouma Sequences (Figure 3e and Figure 6).

The facies is produced mainly by the combined action of abundant sediment supply and traction [51,53]. Ripples are preserved where traction transport does not exceed the sediment supply [51,53]. It is a product of a lower flow regime. It can occur where turbidite sedimentation takes place [51].

5.1.6. Spl- Parallel Laminated Sandstone

The parallel laminated sandstone (Spl) facies is comprised of light gray colour, fine grain sandstone with a parallel laminated structure. Individual laminae are 3–5mm thick. This facies is present in the Tetulghat Section along with other facies (Figure 6 and Figure 10). This facies is mostly associated with ripple cross-laminated sandstone (Sr) facies, not occurring alone in the studied succession (Figure 3e and Figure 6). The facies is frequently studied in the Nayagang Section (Figure 3f,g, Figure 9 and Figure 5). In the Nayagang Section, flame structures are present in the sand laminae (Figure 3f).

The flatbed phase of the upper flow regime generates the parallel sand lamination where the flow velocity is high and the water depth is shallower [57]. During this condition, ripples and dunes are eroded away and parallel laminations are formed [57]. Sediments are medium to fine-grained in this condition where flame structures may present that indicate rapid sedimentation in high-energy conditions [57].

5.1.7. St- Trough cross-bedded Sandstone

The trough cross-bedded sandstone (St) facies is composed of light gray to yellowish gray coloured, medium to fine-grained, trough cross-bedded sandstone with frequent dark gray coloured mud laminae (both continuous and discontinuous), mud drapes along the forests of trough cross-bedding and mud balls scattered sporadically within sandstone units (Figure 3i and Figure 7). Individual units are 35 cm to 2m thick. The tangential nature of foresets at the base indicates the trough cross-stratification. The facies show a stacking nature. The facies is observed in the upper part of the Surma Group in the West Bank Section (Figure 9 and Figure 10). In the Nayagang Section, the facies is common without any interruption of mud drapes or layers (Figure 3h, Figure 9 and Figure 10).

Trough cross-bedding is produced by the migration of 3D bedforms that can be either small-scale current ripples generating centimeter-scale cross-bedding or dunes (large-scale ripples) generating meter-scale cross-bedding [53].

5.1.8. Sf- Flaser Bedded Sandstone Dominated Heterolithic

The flaser bedded sandstone dominated heterolithic (Sf) facies is composed of light gray to yellowish gray coloured, fine-grained sandstone with bluish gray to dark gray coloured mud flakes along crests and troughs of ripples. It occurs in association with other facies of tidal deposits in the West Bank Section (Figure 3j, Figure 7 and Figure 10). The thickness of the facies increases upward in the studied succession from 2cm to 10cm. Mud drapes are found along the troughs and crests (as thin flakes occasionally) of the sand ripples that create flaser.

It produces where the supply of sand and mud are available and alternation of periods of current activity and quiescence is present [51]. During the period of current activity, sand deposits as ripples and mud suspends in water [51]. After the end of the current activity, a period of quiescence comes, and suspended mud deposits in the troughs of ripples as floccules [51]. During the next cycle, crests of previous ripples are eroded away and new sets of ripples deposit bury, and preserve the previous ripples with mud streaks [51]. It is common in tidal flats and subtidal environments where the alternation of current activity and quiescence is present [53].

5.1.9. SMw- Wavy bedded sandstone-mudstone heterolithic

The wavy bedded sandstone-mudstone heterolithic (SMw) facies is comprised of yellowish gray to light gray coloured, fine-grained sandstone and bluish gray mudstone of the same proportion. and the equal proportion of alternating sandstone-mudstone composition suggests the facies as wavy wavy-bedded heterolithic. The facies is found in association with other tidal flat facies such as flaser (Sf) and lenticular (Ml) facies in the West Bank Section (Figure 10 and Figure 3j). Individual thicknesses of units are 1cm to 5cm.

It generates along with flaser and lenticular bedding in tidal settings where the simultaneous possibility of deposition and preservation of both sand and mud prevails [43]. It forms where mud fills ripple troughs and thinly covers ripple crests to produce continuous layers [43]. As a result, the alternating ripple sand layers and filled mud layers produce wavy bedding [43].

5.1.10. Ml- Lenticular Bedded Mudstone Dominated Heterolithic

The lenticular bedded mudstone-dominated heterolithic (Ml) facies is comprised of bluish-gray coloured mud with light gray coloured, fine-grained sand lenses, and lenticels (Figure 3j). This facies is observed in the upper part of the Surma Group in the West Bank Section (Figure 7 and Figure 10). It is associated with other facies of tidal deposits including flaser (Sf) and wavy (SMw) facies (Figure 3j and Figure 7). Individual units are 3cm to 7cm thick. Both continuous and discontinuous sand lenses are present in mudstone.

The facies either occurs by the isolation of sand ripples in both vertical and horizontal directions on mud units or by producing incomplete sand ripples on mud units [43]. One cycle is preserved by covering another muddy layer in the next cycle [43]. It is produced where the deposition and preservation of mud are more favorable than that of sand [43]. Therefore, the main environment for this is intertidal [50,51] and subtidal zones [52,53].

5.1.11. Sc- Convolute Sandstone Heterolithic

The convolute sandstone heterolithic (Sc) facies is comprised of sandstone and mudstone where sand is light gray to yellowish gray coloured, very fine to fine-grained and mud is bluish gray coloured and laminated (Figure 3k). This is present in the lower part of the Surma Group in the Nayagang Section (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The thickness of individual units ranges from 25cm to 40cm. Convolutions increase their amplitudes upward and disappear in the top part. Individual laminae in the units can be traced.

There are a number of explanations for the formation of this facies. When hydroplastic sediments are subjected to differential forces convolution may be produced [43]. Differential liquefaction can also produce convolute bedding [43]. It can be also produced from vertical forces due to the overloading of sediments [54,55]. According to Kuenen [56], convolution develops by the deformation of ripples, when current flows over ripples and their crestal part faces vertical suction and the trough faces downward pressure and because of this differential pressure, the hydroplastic sediments become convoluted. Another cause of convolution is the shearing of current when it flows over the sediment layer that is cohesive in nature [57]. A strong current creates strong shear that drags the sediment layer and creates convolution [57].

Figure 3. Photographic examples of various facies identified in the studied Surma Group. (a) Massive mudstone (Mm) in Tetulghat Section; (b) mud with silt laminae (Msl) in West Bank Section; (c) massive sandstone (Sm) and massive graded sandstone (Smg) in Tetulghat Section; (d,e) ripple cross-laminated sandstone (Sr) and parallel laminated sandstones (Spl) in Tetulghat Section; (f) parallel laminated sandstones (Spl) with flame structure in Nayagang Section; (g) parallel laminated sandstones (Spl) in Nayagang Section; (h) trough cross-bedded sandstone (St) in Nayagang Section; (i) trough cross-bedded sandstone (St) in West Bank Section; (j) tidal heterolithics comprising flaser-wavy-lenticular facies in West bank Section; (k) convolute sandstone heterolithic (Sc) in Nayagang Section; (l) soft sediment deformation including load structure and convolution in upper part of West Bank Section.

Figure 3. Photographic examples of various facies identified in the studied Surma Group. (a) Massive mudstone (Mm) in Tetulghat Section; (b) mud with silt laminae (Msl) in West Bank Section; (c) massive sandstone (Sm) and massive graded sandstone (Smg) in Tetulghat Section; (d,e) ripple cross-laminated sandstone (Sr) and parallel laminated sandstones (Spl) in Tetulghat Section; (f) parallel laminated sandstones (Spl) with flame structure in Nayagang Section; (g) parallel laminated sandstones (Spl) in Nayagang Section; (h) trough cross-bedded sandstone (St) in Nayagang Section; (i) trough cross-bedded sandstone (St) in West Bank Section; (j) tidal heterolithics comprising flaser-wavy-lenticular facies in West bank Section; (k) convolute sandstone heterolithic (Sc) in Nayagang Section; (l) soft sediment deformation including load structure and convolution in upper part of West Bank Section.

5.2. Facies Associations

The studied 11 facies were grouped into five facies associations: FA I- prodelta deposits, FA II- lower delta front deposits, FA III- upper delta front deposits; FA IV- tidal channel deposits, and FA V- tidal flat deposits.. The associations are described below.

5.2.1. FA I- Prodelta deposits

FA I is comprised of massive mudstone (Mm), massive sandstone (Sm), massive graded sandstone (Smg), and mud with silt laminae (Msl) (Figure 5, Figure 8 and Figure 10). The mudstone facies dominate the FA I, they are dark-grey-cloured and often show bioturbation. Soft-sediment deformations such as load structures and convolution are present in the mudstone (Figure 3l). The deposits are about 60m thick in the Tetulghat Section and about 43m thick in the West Bank Section of the studied Surma Group Succession (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 10).

The dominance of dark grey-coloured mud and the presence of bioturbation and soft-sediment deformation structures indicate the prodeltaic origin of these deposits [51,55]. Mud was deposited from settling out of suspension. The presence of sand units at different intervals indicates a deposition from hyperpycnal flows generated at the river mouth during individual high-discharge floodings and storms [55]. Preservation of sandy facies such as massive sandstone and massive graded sandstone facies indicates the proximity to the river mouth. In the Tetulghat Section, a gradual increase in the frequency of occurrence of silt streaks and laminae towards the top is observed (Figure 10). According to Reineck & Singh [51], the frequent occurrence of parallel and lenticular laminations of silt in the mud indicate proximity to the delta front and massiveness and clay dominance in mud indicate distal prodelta away from the delta front. A gradual change from massive muds to silty muds in the younging direction of the lower part of the Tetulghat Section suggests a gradual change from distal prodelta to proximal prodelta deposits in the Surma Group succession at this point (Figure 10). In the West Bank Section, the deposition of mud with frequent parallel and lenticular silt laminae and the presence of soft sediment deformation suggests proximal prodelta deposits (Figure 3b,l and Figure 10).

5.2.2. FA II- Lower delta front deposits

FA II is comprised of massive sandstone (Sm), massive graded sandstone (Smg), massive mudstone (Mm), ripple cross-laminated sandstone (Sr), and parallel laminated sandstone (Spl) (Figure 7 and Figure 10). The deposits are about 140m thick. Sand units show sheet-like geometry in the deposits.

Alternating patterns among massive sandstone beds, massive graded sand units, ripple cross-laminated sandstone units, and mud units, partial Bouma Sequence consisting of ripple sand and parallel laminated sands, abundance of ripple cross lamination, and sheet geometry of sand bodies characterize the deposits in the Tetulghat Section as delta front deposits formed from rapid deceleration of unidirectional flow at distributary mouth bar environments [51,55]. The thickness of mud layers decreases upward in the younging direction from 13cm to 1cm, which indicates proximal delta front deposits [55]. The frequent presence of interbedded mud layers indicates tidal influence in the delta [55].

5.2.3. FA III- Upper delta front deposits

FA III is comprised of mostly sand-dominated facies although muddy facies are occasionally present (Figure 5). The association is comprised of massive sandstone (Sm), parallel laminated sandstone (Spl), trough cross-bedded sandstone (St), convolute sandstone heterolithic (Sc), ripple cross-laminated sandstone (Sr), and massive mudstone (Mm) facies (Figure 3f–h,k, Figure 8 and Figure 10). It is found in the lower part of the Surma Group in Nayagang Section and Sand dominance, frequent occurrence of trough cross-bedding, ripple cross lamentation, parallel lamination, and convolution indicate the deposits as shoreface deposits that were deposited on a subtidal platform [51,55] which is an upper delta front deposit. Sandy facies of the association indicate rapid sedimentation through grain flow in a high-energy and high-velocity condition where traction transport was absent in shallow depth. The presence of convolution (Figure 3k) indicates a subtidal sand bar in a tide-influenced setting where hydroplastic sediments were subjected to differential forces and compaction [51]. The muddy portion of the association suggests settling out from suspension during the period of quiescence [51]. The association can be interpreted as a shoreface deposit on a subtidal platform that is a part of the delta front where strong wave activity prevails for a long period [51,53,57,62–67].

5.2.4. FA IV- Tide-influenced fluvial channel deposits

FA IV is comprised of planar cross-bedded sandstone (Spl), trough cross-bedded sandstone (St), and parallel laminated sandstone (Spl). The cross-bedded sandstones are wedge-shaped and frequently contain mud drapes, mud lamina, and mud balls along the inclined foresets. The upper part of this unit is dominated by tidal heterolithic sequence including flaser-wavy-lenticular facies (Figure 3i, Figure 9 and Figure 10).

Sand units are coarser-grained than adjoining facies, and show a stacking nature and wedge shape geometry that indicates deposition through migration of bars that is supported by the presence of trough cross-bedding [51]. The presence of frequent mud laminae, mud balls, mud drapes in trough cross-bedded sand units, and the presence of tidal flat deposits above these sand deposits, and the thickness of sand bar deposits, ranging from 2m to 5m, strongly suggest that the deposits are a tide-influenced fluvial channel deposits [51,55].

5.2.5. FA V- Tidal flat deposits

FA V is comprised of repeated cycles of tidal heterolithic deposits consisting of flaser-wavy-lenticular facies in the West Bank Section in the Upper Part of the Surma Group (Figure 3j, Figure 9 and Figure 10). It is composed of fine sand and bluish mud. Each tidal cycle ranges from 5cm to 15cm. The association occurs within, in between, above, and below the tidal-influenced channel deposits. The thickness of the association ranges from 12m in between channel deposits to 45m above the channel deposits (Figure 9 and Figure 10).

The cyclic occurrence of tidal heterolithic deposits consisting of flaser, wavy, and lenticular facies suggest the tidal flat origin of these deposits [51,55].

Figure 5. Prodelta deposits (FA I) in the Tetulghat Section. (a) The whole prodelta succession consists of mud and sand units where massive sand (Sm), massive graded sand (Smg), massive mud (Mm), and mud with silt laminae and streaks (Msl); (b) close view of massive prodelta mud (Mm); (c) sand units in prodelta mud such as massive sand units (Sm) and massive graded sand units (Smg). The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete prodelta succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the Tetulghat Section. c. 1.5 meters tall man (white-circled) represents the scale for figure (a).

Figure 5. Prodelta deposits (FA I) in the Tetulghat Section. (a) The whole prodelta succession consists of mud and sand units where massive sand (Sm), massive graded sand (Smg), massive mud (Mm), and mud with silt laminae and streaks (Msl); (b) close view of massive prodelta mud (Mm); (c) sand units in prodelta mud such as massive sand units (Sm) and massive graded sand units (Smg). The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete prodelta succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the Tetulghat Section. c. 1.5 meters tall man (white-circled) represents the scale for figure (a).

Figure 6. Prodelta deposits (FA I) in West Bank Section. (a) Section view of the prodelta succession of from the upper part of the studied Surma Group; (b) close view of the prodelta deposits mostly mud with silt laminae and streaks with various soft sediment deformations. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete prodelta succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the West Bank Section. c. A 1.5-meter-tall man (white-circled) represents the scale for the figure (a).

Figure 6. Prodelta deposits (FA I) in West Bank Section. (a) Section view of the prodelta succession of from the upper part of the studied Surma Group; (b) close view of the prodelta deposits mostly mud with silt laminae and streaks with various soft sediment deformations. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete prodelta succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the West Bank Section. c. A 1.5-meter-tall man (white-circled) represents the scale for the figure (a).

Figure 7. Lower delta front deposits (FA II) in the Tetulghat Section. (a) Whole delta front deposits in Tetulghat Section; (b) close view of delta front succession where dominance of sand and alternating pattern of sand and mud units is shown; (c) partial Bouma Sequence consisting of ripple sand and parallel laminated sand units in the delta front succession in Tetulghat Section. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete lower delta front succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the Tetulghat Section.

Figure 7. Lower delta front deposits (FA II) in the Tetulghat Section. (a) Whole delta front deposits in Tetulghat Section; (b) close view of delta front succession where dominance of sand and alternating pattern of sand and mud units is shown; (c) partial Bouma Sequence consisting of ripple sand and parallel laminated sand units in the delta front succession in Tetulghat Section. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete lower delta front succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the Tetulghat Section.

Figure 8. Upper delta front deposits (FA III) succession in Nayagang Section. (a) Section view of the Upper delta front deposits exposed in Nayagang Section; (b) Close view of the deposits where trough cross-bedded and ripple cross-laminated sand units are shown. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete Upper delta front succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the Nayagang Section. c. The hammer (white-circled) represents the scale for the figure (b).

Figure 8. Upper delta front deposits (FA III) succession in Nayagang Section. (a) Section view of the Upper delta front deposits exposed in Nayagang Section; (b) Close view of the deposits where trough cross-bedded and ripple cross-laminated sand units are shown. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete Upper delta front succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the Nayagang Section. c. The hammer (white-circled) represents the scale for the figure (b).

Figure 9. Alluvial to Delta plain succession comprising tide-influenced fluvial channel (FA IV) and tidal flat (FA V) deposits in the West Bank Section. (a) Macro-scale view of delta plain deposits where tide-influenced fluvial channel and tidal flat deposits are shown together separated by white colored line; (b) close view of tidal flat deposits consisting of tidal rhythmites; (c) Close view of tide-influenced fluvial channel deposits observed in the West Bank Section. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete delta plain succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the West Bank Section. c. A 1.5-meter-tall man represents the scale for Figure (b) and a white-circled 30cm wide bag represents the scale for figure (c).

Figure 9. Alluvial to Delta plain succession comprising tide-influenced fluvial channel (FA IV) and tidal flat (FA V) deposits in the West Bank Section. (a) Macro-scale view of delta plain deposits where tide-influenced fluvial channel and tidal flat deposits are shown together separated by white colored line; (b) close view of tidal flat deposits consisting of tidal rhythmites; (c) Close view of tide-influenced fluvial channel deposits observed in the West Bank Section. The graphic sedimentary log on the right side of the figure represents the complete delta plain succession of the studied Surma Group exposed in the West Bank Section. c. A 1.5-meter-tall man represents the scale for Figure (b) and a white-circled 30cm wide bag represents the scale for figure (c).

Figure 10. Composite log of the studied Surma Group recorded from different sections. A on the map indicates the location and position of the Nayagang Section, B on the map designates the location of the Tetulghat Section, and C on the map indicates the location and position of the West Bank Section. Logs in the lower portion of the figure represent different facies, facies associations, and their respective depositional settings. Logs are arranged according to their relative position, from the bottom to the top (A–C) within the Surma Group.

Figure 10. Composite log of the studied Surma Group recorded from different sections. A on the map indicates the location and position of the Nayagang Section, B on the map designates the location of the Tetulghat Section, and C on the map indicates the location and position of the West Bank Section. Logs in the lower portion of the figure represent different facies, facies associations, and their respective depositional settings. Logs are arranged according to their relative position, from the bottom to the top (A–C) within the Surma Group.

6. Discussions

7. Conclusions

References

1. Boateng, C.D.; Li-Yun, F.; Sylvester, K.D. Characterization of complex fluvio–deltaic deposits in Northeast China using multi-modal machine learning fusion. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Choi, K.; Jackson, M.D.; Hampson, G.J.; Jones, A.D.W.; Reynolds, A.D. Predicting the impact of sedimentological heterogeneity on gas–oil and water–oil displacements: fluvio-deltaic Pereriv Suite Reservoir, Azeri–Chirag–Gunashli Oilfield, South Caspian Basin. Pet. Geosci. 2011, 17(2), 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Deshpande, A.; Flemings, P.B.; Huang, J. Quantifying lateral heterogeneities in fluvio-deltaic sediments using three-dimensional reflection seismic data: Offshore Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1997, 102, 15385–15401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Maharaj, V.T.; Wood, L.J. A Quantitative Paleogeomorphic Study of the Fluvio-Deltaic Reservoirs in the Atoka Interval, Fort Worth Basin, Texas, USA 2009.
5. Oudjida, A. Geologically oriented reservoir modeling of a fluvio-deltaic reservoir: The TAGI of the Ourhoud field, Berkine Basin, Algeria. AAPG HEDBERG CONFERENCE “Paleozoic and Triassic Petroleum Systems in North Africa”, Algiers, Algeria 2003.
6. Yassin, M.; Abdullatif, O.; Hariri, M. Sedimentology and Reservoir Characteristics of Early Cretaceous Fluvio-Deltaic and Lacustrine Deposits, Upper Abu Gabra Formation, Sufyan Sub-basin, Muglad Rift Basin, Sudan. In EGU Gen. Assem. Conf. Abstr. 2017, 8695.
7. Keogh, K.J.; Martinius, A.W.; Osland, R. The development of fluvial stochastic modelling in the Norwegian oil industry: A historical review, subsurface implementation and future directions. Sediment. Geol. 2007, 202, 249–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Jordan, D.W.; Pryor, W.A. Hierarchical levels of heterogeneity in a Mississippi River meander belt and application to reservoir systems. AAPG Bull. 1992, 76, 1601–1624. [Google Scholar]
9. Miall, A.D. Reservoir heterogeneities in fluvial sandstones: lessons from outcrop studies. AAPG bulletin 1988, 72, 682–697. [Google Scholar]
10. Howell, J.A.; Martinius, A.W.; Good, T.R. The application of outcrop analogues in geological modelling: a review, present status and future outlook. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2014, 387, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Manzocchi, T.; Carter, J.N.; Skorstad, A.; Fjellvoll, B.; Stephen, K.D.; Howell, J.A.; Matthews, J.D.; Walsh, J.J.; Nepveu, M.; Bos, C.; et al. Sensitivity of the impact of geological uncertainty on production from faulted and unfaulted shallow-marine oil reservoirs: objectives and methods. Pet. Geosci. 2008, 14, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Pranter, M.J.; Hewlett, A.C.; Cole, R.D.; Wang, H.; Gilman, J. Fluvial architecture and connectivity of the Williams Fork Formation: use of outcrop analogues for stratigraphic characterization and reservoir modelling. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2014, 387, 57–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Robinson, J.W.; McCabe, P.J. Sandstone-body and shale-body dimensions in a braided fluvial system: Salt Wash Sandstone Member (Morrison Formation), Garfield County, Utah. AAPG Bull. 1997, 81, 1267–1291. [Google Scholar]
14. Rahman, M.M.; Howell, J.A.; Macdonald, D.I. Virtual outcrop-based analysis of channel and crevasse splay sandstone body architecture in the Middle Jurassic Ravenscar Group, Yorkshire, NE England. J. Geol. Soc. 2022, 179, jgs2021-017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Alam, M.; Alam, M.M.; Curray, J.R.; Chowdhury, M.L.R.; Gani, M.R. 2003. An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history. Sediment. Geol. 2003, 155, 179–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Holtrop, J.F.; Keizer, J. Some aspects of the stratigraphy and correlation of the Surma Basin wells, East Pakistan. ECAFE Miner. Resour. Dev. Ser. 1970, 36, 143–154. [Google Scholar]
17. Imam, B. Energy resources of Bangladesh; University grants commission of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2013; p. 277. [Google Scholar]
18. Reimann, K.U. and Hiller, K. Geology of Bangladesh; Gebruder Borntraeger: Berlin–Stuttgart, Germany, 1993.
19. Ajdukiewicz, J.M.; Lander, R.H. Sandstone reservoir quality prediction: The state of the art. AAPG Bull. 2010, 94(8), 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Yıldız, G.; Yılmaz, İ.Ö. Reservoir heterogeneity of Ordovician sandstone reservoir (Bedinan Formation, SE Turkey): Diagenetic and sedimentological approaches. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2020, 118, 104444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Worden, R.H.; Barclay, S.A. The effect of oil emplacement on diagenetic clay mineralogy: the Upper Jurassic Magnus Sandstone Member, North Sea. Clay Miner. Cem. Sandstones 1999, 453–469. [Google Scholar]
22. Kim, J.C.; Lee, Y.I.; Hisada, K.I. Depositional and compositional controls on sandstone diagenesis, the Tetori Group (Middle Jurassic–Early Cretaceous), central Japan. Sediment. Geol. 2007, 195, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Morad, S.; Al-Ramadan, K.; Ketzer, M.; De-ros, L.F. Impact of diagenetic alterations on reservoir quality and heterogeneity of paralic and shallow marine sandstones: links to depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy. AAPG Bull. 2010, 94, 1267–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Al-Ramadan, K. Illitization of smectite in sandstones: the Permian Unayzah reservoir, Saudi Arabia. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2014, 39, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
25. Craigie, N.W.; Breuer, P.; Khidir, A. Chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of Devonian, Carboniferous and Permian sediments encountered in eastern Saudi Arabia: An integrated approach to reservoir correlation. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2016, 72, 156–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
26. Amaefule, J.O.; Altunbay, M.; Tiab, D.; Kersey, D.G.; Keelan, D.K. Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, October 1993, OnePetro.
27. Gunter, G.W.; Finneran, J.M.; Hartmann, D.J.; Miller, J.D. Early determination of reservoir flow units using an integrated petrophysical method. paper SPE 38679 prepared for presentation at the 1997 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Texas, 5-8 October 1997, 1-8.
28. Pittman, E.D. Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves for sandstone. AAPG Bull. 1992, 76, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
29. Castillo, P.; Ou, L.; Prasad, M. Petrophysical description of tight gas sands. In SEG Tech. Program Expand. Abstr. 2012, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
30. Lietz, J.K.; Kabir, J. Prospects and constraints of oil exploration in Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of 4th Offshore Southeast Asia Conf., 1982, Singapore, pp. 1–4.
31. Hiller, K.; Elahi, M. Structural development and hydrocarbon entrapment in the Surma Basin/Bangladesh (northwest Indo Burman fold belt). In Southeast Asia Show February 1984, OnePetro.
32. Khan, M.A.M.; Ismail, M.; Ahmed, M. Geology and Hydrocarbon prospects of the Surma Basin, Bangladesh. In: Seventh Offshore South Asia Conference, 1988, Singapore, pp. 364–387.
33. Alam, M. Geology and depositional history of Cenozoic sediments of the Bengal Basin of Bangladesh. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 1989, 69, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Johnson, S.Y.; Alam, A.M.N. Sedimentation and tectonics of the Sylhet trough, Bangladesh. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1991, 103, 1513–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
35. Shamsuddin, A.H.M.; Brown, T.; Lee, S.; Curiale, J. Petroleum Systems of Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of the 13th Southeast Asia petroleum Exploration Society (SEAPEX) Exploration Conf., 2001, Singapore 4th–6th April.
36. Gani, M.R.; Alam, M.M. Sedimentation and basin-fill history of the Neogene clastic succession exposed in the southeastern fold belt of the Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: a high-resolution sequence stratigraphic approach. Sediment. Geol. 2003, 155, 227–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Islam, M.A. Diagenesis and reservoir quality of Bhuban sandstones (Neogene), Titas Gas Field, Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2009, 35, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
38. Mitchell, A.H.G.; Reading, H.G. Sedimentation and tectonics. In Sedimentary environments and facies; Reading, H.G., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, England, 1986; pp. 471–519. [Google Scholar]
39. Curray, J.R.; Emmel, F.J.; Moore, D.G.; Raitt, R.W. Structure, tectonics, and geological history of the northeastern Indian Ocean. The ocean basins and margins: Indian Ocean 1982, 399-450.
40. Molnar, P. Structure and tectonics of the Himalaya: Constraints and implications of geophysical data. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1984, 12, 489–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
41. Chen, W.P.; Molnar, P. Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong Plateau and the northern Indoburman ranges. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1990, 95, 12527–12552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
42. Murthy, M.V.N.; Talukdar, S.C.; Bhattacharya, A.C.; Chakrabarti, C. The Dauki fault of Assam. Bull. Oil Nat. Gas Comm. (India) 1969, 6, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
43. Molnar, P. The distribution of intensity associated with the great 1897 Assam earthquake and bounds on the extent of the rupture zone. J. Geol. Soc. India (Online Arch. Vol 1 Vol 78) 1987, 30, 13–27. [Google Scholar]
44. Murphy, R.W.; Staff of BOGMC. Bangladesh enters the oil era. Oil Gas J. 1988, 86, 76–82. [Google Scholar]
45. Seeber, L.; Armbruster, J.G. Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalayan arc and long-term forecasting. Earthq. Predict. Int. Rev. 1981, 4, 259–277. [Google Scholar]
46. Ahmed, A. (1983). Oligocene stratigraphy and sedimentation in the Surma Basin, Bangladesh. [unpublished M. Sc. thesis], University of Dhaka.
47. Khan, M.R.; Muminullah, M. Stratigraphy of Bangladesh. In Petroleum and Mineral Resources of Bangladesh: Seminar and Exhibition October 1980, pp. 35–40.
48. Miall, A.D. The geology of fluvial deposits: sedimentary facies, basin analysis and petroleum geology; Springer-Verlag Inc.: Heidelberg, 1996; p. 582. [Google Scholar]
49. Dreyer, T.; Scheie, Å.; Walderhaug, O. Minipermeameter-based study of permeability trends in channel sand bodies. AAPG Bull. 1990, 74, 359–374. [Google Scholar]
50. Haldorsen, H.H. Simulator parameter assignment and the problem of scale in reservoir engineering. Reserv. Charact. 1986, 6, 293–340. [Google Scholar]
51. Reineck, H.E.; Singh, I.B. Depositional sedimentary environments: with reference to terrigenous clastics, 2nd ed.; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin-Heidelberg, 1980. [Google Scholar]
52. Weber, K.J. Influence of common sedimentary structures on fluid flow in reservoir models. J. Pet. Technol. 1982, 34, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
53. Boggs, S. Petrology of sedimentary rocks, 2nd ed.; Cambridge university press: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
54. Pickering, K.T.; Hiscott, R.N. Deep marine systems: processes, deposits, environments, tectonics and sedimentation; John Wiley & Sons: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
55. Bhattacharya, J.P. Deltas. In Facies Models 4; James, N.P., Dalrymple, R.W., Eds, *!!! REPLACE !!!*, Eds.; Geological Association of Canada: Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
56. Tucker, M.E. Sedimentary Petrology–An Introduction to the Origin of Sedimentary Rocks, 3rd ed.; Blackwell Scientific publication: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
57. Collinson, J.D.; Mountney, N.P. Sedimentary structures, 4th ed.; Dunedin Academic Press Ltd.: Edinburgh, London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
58. Reineck, H.E. SedimentgefUge im Bereich der siidlichen Nordsee. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturforsch 1963, Ges. 505, 138. [Google Scholar]
59. Reineck, H.E.; Dörjes, J.; Gadow, S.I.B.Y.L.L.E.; Hertweck, G.U.N.T.H.E.R. Sedimentologie, Faunenzonierung und Faziesabfolge vor der Ostküste der inneren Deutschen Bucht. Senckenberg. Lethaea 1968, 4. [Google Scholar]
60. Häntzschel, W. Die Schichtungs-Formen rezenter Flachmeer-Ablagerungen im Jade-Gebiet. Senckenbergiana 1936, 18, 316–356. [Google Scholar]
61. Van Straaten, L.M.J.U. Composition and structure of recent marine sediments in the Netherlands. Leidse Geol. Meded. 1954, 19, 1–108. [Google Scholar]
62. Mckee, E.D.; Reynolds, M.A.; Baker, C.H. Laboratory studies on deformation in unconsolidated sediment. Short Papers in Geology, Hydrology, and Topography; Articles 120-179: Geological Survey Research 1962; Scientific Notes and Summaries of Investigations 1962, 151.
63. Mckee, E.D.; Goldberg, M. Experiments on formation of contorted structures in mud. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1969, 80, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
64. Kuenen, P.H. Significant features of graded bedding. AAPG Bull. 1953, 37, 1044–1066. [Google Scholar]
65. Sanders, J.E. Primary sedimentary structures formed by turbidity currents and related resedimentation mechanisms. In: Middleton, G.V., ed., Primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 1965, 12, 192–219. [Google Scholar]
66. Reineck, H.E. Longitudinale Schrägschicht im Watt. Geol. Rundsch. 1958, 47, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
67. Wunderlich, F. Die Entstehung von “convolute bedding” an Platenrändern. Senckenberg. Lethaea 1967, 48, 345–349. [Google Scholar]
68. Haque, A.K.M.; Downey, W.S.; Alam, M.M.; Islam, M.A.; Faruk, M.O.; Islam, R. Eocene-Miocene Stratigraphy of the Surma Trough, Bengal Basin: A Sequence Stratigraphic Approach. Pet. Coal 2019, 61. [Google Scholar]
69. Curray, J.R. The Bengal depositional system: From rift to orogeny. Mar. Geol. 2014, 352, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
70. Sultana, D.N.; Alam, M.M. Facies analysis of the Neogene Surma group succession in the subsurface of the Sylhet Trough, Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. 10th Geol. Conf. Bangladesh Geol. Soc. 2001, Abstracts, 70.
71. Mode, A.W.; Anyiam, O.A.; John, S.I. Depositional environment and reservoir quality assessment of the “Bruks Field,” Niger Delta. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2017, 7, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
72. Reynolds, A.D.; Simmons, M.D.; Bowman, M.B.; Henton, J.; Brayshaw, A.C.; Ali-Zade, A.A.; Koshkarly, O. Implications of outcrop geology for reservoirs in the Neogene Productive Series: Apsheron Peninsula, Azerbaijan. AAPG Bull. 1998, 82, 25–49. [Google Scholar]
73. Haq, B.U.; Hardenbol, J.; Vail, P.R. Mesozoic and cenozoic chronostratigraphy and cycles of sea-level change. Sea-Level Changes, 1988, 71–108. [CrossRef]
74. Hossain, S.; Shekhar, H.; Rahman, N. Facies and architectural element analysis of the Upper Bokabil Sandstone in the Bengal Basin. Sediment. Geol. 2023, 453, 106433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
75. Shreya, S.; Bhuiyan, M.A.; Hossain, S.; Sultana, T. Petrophysical Reservoir Characterization of Habiganj Gas Field, Surma Basin, Bangladesh. Dhaka Univ. J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
76. Kamruzzaman; Hossain, D.; Sarker, M.R.; Khatun, M.; Shahriar, M.U. Improving Insights Into Petrophysics using Geophysical Data for the Habiganj Structure, Surma Basin, Bangladesh. Handbook of Petroleum Geoscience, 2022, 394–412. Portico. [CrossRef]