2.1.1. Hospital Management Accounting: Concepts and Functions
Hospital management accounting is defined as the accounting of a hospital. to the usual of accounting and financial techniques applied specifically in the hospital environment. It involves the collection, analysis and interpretation of financial and operational evidence relevant to the strategic management of hospitals. Its main objective is to provide data and insights for decision making, performance monitoring and cost control.
Importance of management accounting for hospitals: Management accounting is critical to hospital management's efficiency and sustainability. It allows managers to have a clear view of finances and operations, helping to make decisions based on accurate information. Furthermore, management accounting provides effective cost control and the identification of areas for improvement, contributing to the optimization of resources and the achievement of satisfactory financial results. As a major provider of services and consumer of resources, the public sector has a large influence on national and international progress towards sustainable development. Furthermore, public sector organizations (PSOs) face increasing pressure to lead by example in managing and reporting sustainability issues (GRI, 2004, 2005; GRI FPA, 2012). Due to the critical impact that PSOs have on the environment and society, it has become increasingly important to analyze accounting, reporting and sustainability reporting practices, as well as to conduct research involving policy professionals in the public sector (Bola and Grubnic, 2007; Bola et al., 2014).
Natural resource conservation and emission levels, environmental activities and initiatives, aspects of employment, occupational health and safety, community relations, stakeholder engagement, and the organization's economic impact are all examples of sustainability performance (Hoque and Adams, 2008). The use of sustainability accounting allows for the systematic identification and interconnection of the social, environmental, and economic costs and benefits of organisational policies and actions, as well as their implementation into organisational decision-making (Hopwood et al., 2005).
As a result, the sustainability report serves as “a vehicle for evaluating the economic, environmental and social impacts of the organization's operations, products and services and its overall contribution to sustainable development” (GRI, 2004, p. 20).
According to existing literature, the public sector has implemented sustainability accounting and reporting procedures. To date, the primary research focus has been on sustainability reporting techniques (Gibson and Guthrie, 1995; Goswa-mi and Lodhia, 2014; Guthrie and Farneti, 2008; Leesone et al.,, 2005; William et al.,, 2011; Williams, 2015), drivers of sustainability reports (Farneti and Guthrie, 2009;Lodhia and Jacobs, 2013; Lodhia and et al.,, 2012; Marcuccio and Steccolini, 2005; Mussari and Monfardini, 2010), sustainability accounting (Bola, 2004,2005,2007), accounting for environmental management (qiane et al., 2011) and stakeholder adjustment (Gregoe et al., 2013; Kaur and Lodhia, 2014, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019). However, there is still a lot to learn about accounting, accountability, and sustainability reporting in the public sector.
Importance of management accounting for hospitals: Management accounting theatres a crucial part in the efficient and sustainable management of hospitals. It allows managers to have a clear view of finances and operations, helping to make decisions based on accurate information. Furthermore, management accounting provides effective cost control and the identification of areas for improvement, contributing to the optimization of resources and the achievement of satisfactory financial results.
Functions of management accounting in the hospital context: Management accounting performs several functions in the hospital context, including:
Cost assessment and control: Management accounting allows for detailed monitoring and control of hospital costs, identifying areas where expenses can be reduced, operational efficiency can be improved and resources can be allocated more effectively.
Strategic decision making: Management accounting provides financial and operational information that supports strategic decision making. It assists in evaluating investments, defining service prices, identifying revenue sources and long-term planning, enabling the implementation of more effective strategies.
Performance evaluation: Management accounting allows the analysis and monitoring of the hospital's performance in several areas, such as patient care, operational efficiency and quality of services. This facilitates the identification of strengths and weaknesses, enabling the implementation of corrective actions to improve overall performance.
Planning and budgeting: Management accounting plays a fundamental role in the hospital's financial and budgetary planning. It assists in revenue projection, cost estimation, definition of financial goals and efficient allocation of available resources, allowing for more accurate strategic planning.
Support for value-based management: Hospital management accounting can adopt the value-based management approach, which seeks to evaluate and improve the relationship between the health results achieved and the costs involved. This allows for a more strategic allocation of resources and more effective management of the services provided.
In summary, hospital management accounting is essential for the efficient and sustainable management of hospitals. It provides relevant information for strategic decision making, cost control, performance monitoring and financial planning, contributing to the success of healthcare institutions.
This study aims to expand research in the public sector accounting, accountability, and sustainability reporting. The goal is to expand on current public-sector research programmes and better understand the role of PSOs in advancing the accounting, accountability, and sustainability reporting agenda. The documents demonstrate varied accounting and sustainability reporting techniques of various types of PSOs from various nations. Environmental reports, social reports, and sustainability reports in hybrid PSOs are among the documents included in this special edition, as are integrated reporting (IR) and stakeholder adjustment, as well as the implementation of environmental performance into the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and performance evaluation systems. The articles employ a variety of investigative methodologies, such as case studies that include interviews and longitudinal content analyses, web content analysis, and quantitative methods such as surveys and linear regression. The studies' backdrop includes hybrid PSOs in Spain and Sweden, the Italian provincial government, the Australian healthcare sector, New Zealand Post, Moroccan public institutions and enterprises, and Malaysian local governments.
Because hybrid PSOs have financial and non-financial objectives, they operate in a complicated business environment, and this complexity impacts sustainability reporting approaches. Argento et al. (2019) Using institutional logics, we investigated the nature of and influences on the sustainability dissemination practices of 45 Swedish state-owned healthcare facilities (SOEs). The authors employed quantitative content analysis to analyse the impact of public ownership, board composition, firm size, and profitability on the substance of sustainability reporting disclosures from state-owned enterprises. The authors demonstrated that just two criteria, "state ownership" and "company size," have a substantial impact on public firms' sustainability disclosures. They discovered that fully public entities reveal less sustainability information than partially state-owned SOEs, while large SOEs release significantly more than small SOEs.
Argento et al. (2019), Andrades and Larrán-Jorge (2019) Examine the disclosure policies of Spanish public corporations, with a focus on mandated non-financial disclosures. The research includes data about the level of mandatory non-financial reports made by Spanish state-owned companies, as well as the factors that influence these reports. The researchers describe a low level of mandated non-financial information disclosure due to uncertainty in Spanish rules and a lack of implementation of New Public Management, resulting in a lack of accountability and effective regulatory enforcement. According to the authors, the extent of disclosures is determined by institutional size, with larger SOEs disclosing greater details than small SOEs.
Internal regulation (IR) in the public sector is another major topic of study. In this regard, Farneti et al. (2019a) Investigate the impact of IR demands and stakeholder information on social disclosures, focusing on the three social capitals identified in the IR framework: intellectual, human, and social and relationship capital. Using an internal organisational perspective, the authors undertake a case study to illustrate changes in disclosures to various stakeholder groups as a result of IR adoption. Adopting the IR framework, the authors discovered, promoted broad stakeholder involvement and a materiality assessment methodology, allowing the case study organisation to minimise the amount of social disclosures and focus on the social issues most significant to interested parties.
Farnetie et al.(2019b) using longitudinal analysis, investigate non-financial disclosures in an Italian provincial government's social reports to establish their significance, contribution, and evolution. They conducted in-depth research using case studies to learn more about the extent and application of voluntary social and environmental disclosures. The authors observed a rise in the level of disclosure throughout the ten-year period, as well as a shift from a descriptive, narrative approach to more detailed disclosures. The organisation, however, chose metrics from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The authors also observe a widespread reduction in interest in the development of autonomous social reports, and that such reports have been prepared only to gain public credibility.
As a result, the authors emphasised the necessity for non-financial information disclosure regulation because the organization's social and environmental disclosures were primarily at its discretion.
Previous research has primarily focused on wealthy countries, and little is known about how the public sector in developing countries maintains and presents non-financial performance metrics. In line with this, Ibrahimi and Naim (2019) studied various aspects influencing the usage of non-financial indicators in Moroccan governmental institutions and firms' performance evaluation systems (MPIE). The authors show, using contingency theory, that the Moroccan MPIE's use of non-financial metrics is determined only by the institution's age. Other organisational variables, such as the size of the institution and the competitive environment, did not stimulate the incorporation of non-financial metrics in performance evaluation systems.
However, Che-Ku-Kassime et al., (2019) Using legitimacy theory, we performed a study to examine the environmental reporting practices of Malaysian local governments and the determinants of such activities.
The authors demonstrated that most Malaysian local governments report environmental information using more than one disclosure average. Annual reports and website announcements are major modes of communication. They also discovered that the primary purpose for environmental reporting is to preserve and improve the organization's image in the eyes of the appropriate audience.
An important area of research is the use of the BSC to specifically incorporate environmental performance in the public sector. Khalide et al., (2019) As a leading provider of healthcare services in Australia, investigate the viability of various BSC models for incorporating environmental performance. Using a case study methodology, the authors offer four viewpoints that can help healthcare organisations include environmental performance into their BSC, including an enlarged model with five perspectives and an integrated model with a separate climate change perspective. The authors believe, however, that the adoption of a specific model is contingent on the organization's environmental vision and strategy.
2.1.4. Strategies for the Sustainability of Hospital Management Accounting
Improving accounting data integrity and dependability: An important strategy for the sustainability of hospital management accounting is improving accounting data integrity and dependability. This involves implementing strict internal controls, periodic reviews of accounting processes, using advanced technologies to automate repetitive tasks and ensure data integrity. Furthermore, it is essential to establish clear recording and reporting standards, ensuring that all professionals involved have an adequate understanding of accounting practices.
Hospital administration training and professional development accounting: Investing in training and professional development in hospital management accounting is essential for the sustainability of this area. Professionals responsible for accounting must have a solid knowledge of financial and cost accounting, as well as an understanding of the peculiarities and challenges of the healthcare sector. Participation in specific training, courses and workshops can help update and improve professionals' skills, allowing them to perform their roles more efficiently and effectively.
Integration of information systems: The integration of information systems is a crucial strategy for the sustainability of hospital management accounting. This involves implementing a comprehensive and integrated hospital information system that allows real-time collection, storage and sharing of accounting data. Systems integration facilitates communication between different departments and areas of the hospital, avoiding redundancies, errors and rework. Furthermore, an integrated system provides a comprehensive and updated view of accounting information, contributing to more efficient and informed management.
Implementation of relevant performance indicators: Implementation of key performance indicators is fundamental to the sustainability of hospital management accounting. These indicators must be aligned with the hospital's strategic goals and reflect the financial, operational and quality aspects of services. Some examples of indicators may include cost per procedure, bed occupancy rate, patient satisfaction and operational efficiency indices. The definition and monitoring of these indicators allows for a continuous assessment of the hospital's performance, identifying areas for improvement and guiding decision-making.
Continuous assessment and monitoring: Continuous assessment and monitoring are fundamental strategies for the sustainability of hospital management accounting. This involves carrying out internal and external audits, periodic reviews of accounting processes, analysis of deviations and variations, in addition to regular monitoring of performance indicators. Continuous assessment and monitoring allow you to recognise possible problems and conduct remedial actions swiftly, ensuring the efficacy and dependability of accounting procedures.
By adopting these strategies, hospitals can strengthen the sustainability of management accounting, improving the quality of accounting data, training their professionals, integrating information systems, implementing relevant performance indicators and continuously monitoring accounting processes. This contributes to more efficient and informed management, allowing hospitals to face the challenges of the healthcare sector and achieve satisfactory financial and operational results.