1. Introduction
The different organs and systems of the human body uniquely interact between them to maintain homeostasis. When one of them works badly, creates a syndrome. Sometimes it is difficult to understand where began the problem.
Cirrhosis is a chronic disease with multiple etiologies, multiple manifestations, and multi-organ involvement. Portal hypertension (PHT) is the main complication of cirrhosis, and it is the main reason for the systemic manifestations of cirrhosis, independently of the etiology.
Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is a consequence of PHT, being a recent syndrome, only recognized in 2005, with a lack of epidemiological studies. [
1] The manifestations of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy can be systolic heart failure (HF), diastolic dysfunction, or/and electrophysiological abnormalities. It is an exclusion diagnosis of HF. [
1,
2,
3] and it is a consequence of hyperdynamic circulation of the splanchnic system with increased cardiac output, reduced systemic vascular resistance, and activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and arginine-vasopressin systems. In systolic dysfunction, nevertheless the high cardiac output, the heart is unable to meet its demands to generate adequate arterial blood pressure and cardiac output to vascularize the organs. [
1,
2] In diastolic heart failure, because of hyperdynamic circulation, the myocardium stays hypertrophic, and fibrotic, increasing stiffness and impairs relaxation. These mechanisms contribute to liver decompensation because of congestive hepatopathy. [
1,
2] On the other hand, one person can have cardiopathy for multiple reasons, and at the same time have cirrhosis, where the decompensation of one of them can trigger a decompensation of another. [
4] When there is heart failure and decompensated cirrhosis, the renal system is the most affected. Because of this relationship, it is increasingly accepted that hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the consequence of the cardio-renal link in cirrhosis, also named type-5 cardio-renal syndrome. The hemodynamic changes that happen in the liver-heart axis explained before, taking to renal hypoperfusion, and renal venous congestion. [
3,
5,
6,
7,
8]
The management of the liver-kidney-heart axis is a big and complex challenge. On one hand, we want to diminish the congestion with diuretics; on the other hand, diuretics aggravate kidney perfusion. It will limit the introduction of different drugs with prognostic value on cirrhosis and heart failure. The administration of vasoconstrictors like terlipressin and albumin ameliorated the kidney achievement. As a consequence, drugs with prognostic value can be restarted. [
2,
7,
8]
With the clinical case presented in the next words, the authors want to show the degree of complexity of one patient and the importance of teamwork to better medical treatment.
2. Case description
We presented a 77-year-old woman, with cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Associated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), secondary an ischemic and valvular cardiopathy: acute myocardial infarction in 2001, complicated with left ventricle (LV) pseudo-aneurism, that needed Chirurgie correction and consequently a metal mitral valve substitution. She was accompanied in cardiology consultations, and throughout the years, the patient developed a slow ventricular response atrial failure, with a pacemaker (PM) needed in 2012, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in 2021. The last echocardiography in 2022 showed non-dilated left and right ventricles with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF) of 36% and normal function mitral valve prosthesis regurgitation with severe tricuspid regurgitation.
Other personal problems are chronic Kidney disease (CKD), with a basal creatinine of 2 mg/dL and glomerular filtration rate of 22 mg/dL/1.73 m2 since 2016, and stable decompensated cirrhosis (some digestive bleeding by gastroduodenal varices in the past) secondary to primary biliary cirrhosis since 2021. She has also, mild pancytopenia and mild hypoalbuminemia.
¿no tuvo ningún ingreso por su cirrhosis descompensada? REVISAR
In July of 2023, the patient went to the emergency department after progressive abdominal perimeter augmentation, leg edema, and hematochezia. The workup showed stable anemia (10 g/dL), but worsening of kidney function, with 2.5 mg/dL of creatinine. The diagnosis paracentesis excluded spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), the Serum-Ascitis-albumin-Gradient (SAAG), was 1.1 g/dL, and abdominal eco-Doppler excluded portal thrombosis. The Nt pro-BNP was 45000 pg/ mL, being the basal value for this patient.
Assumed acute decompensated cirrhosis and acute decompensated chronic kidney disease, having triggered digestive bleeding, and the patient stayed hospitalized.
In the first week, the patient had no other digestive bleeding and started intravenous diuretic therapy. However, the ascites got worse, with signs of tension ascites, and she presented the workup shown in
Table 1.
With these findings, cardiogenic shock was suspected by internal medicine, requesting the help of a multidisciplinary team. Low cardiac output (2.3L/min/1.73m2) was discarded, and the patient was consequently treated suspecting hepatorenal syndrome. The steps were evacuated paracentesis, oral terlipressin, and intravenous albumin.
Two days later, the creatinine reduced by about 25% of the last value, allowing to start the diuretic treatment.
Fourteen days after the treatment with terlipressin, albumin, and diuretic adjustment, the patient presented with 2.7 mg/dl of creatinine and 54576 pg/mL of Nt pro-BNP.
Nevertheless, transthoracic echocardiography showed no differences with the first one.
After a multidisciplinary team discussion, taking into account the patient’s fragility and comorbidities, as well as maladaptive RV remodeling (end stage of probable postcapillary pulmonary hypertension), conservative treatment was decided. Evolution was torpid in the next months, always with cirrhosis decompensations, but with cardiac stability thanks to aggressive diuretic treatment.
4. Discussion
This clinical case shows perfectly the complexity of organ systems interaction, and the need for multidiscipline teamwork to better understand and better treat the patients.
The patient has three big systemic syndromes, cirrhosis, HErEF, and CKD. Digestive bleeding was the basis of the problem. This happening is a sign of acute decompensated cirrhosis. For that, the worsening of hyperdynamic circulation and decrease of peripheric vascular resistance triggered an acute biventricular heart failure. The left heart, previously ill, cannot send the needed perfusion to the organs. For that, we assessed a kidney hypoperfusion.
As a consequence, the right ventricle afterload increased, and stayed dilated and a functional tricuspid regurgitation was observed. It provokes venous congestion, including renal venous congestion.
It was a big challenge to arrive at this clinical interpretation. The biggest challenge was to understand how to manage this clinical situation: the Kidney needs perfusion, but the liver and heart demand decongestion. Where does the scale fall? Well, after multidisciplinary teamwork, that allowed to mind that hepatorenal syndrome is one example of the existence of a Liver-Kidney-Heart axis, it allowed choosing the best medical treatment for the patient: perfuse the kidneys with effective volume and pressure (terlipressin and albumin); recover the kidneys and after that, these were prepared to decongestive treatment.
After arriving at a stable phase, the patient continued with severe tricuspid regurgitation. How we can see this patient is very complex, so the best decision was medical optimal treatment.
5. Conclusions
This clinical case gives us many learning points: the body’s systems are interdependents, so the best way of work is like a multidisciplinary team. The sharing of knowledge, allows us to remember the organs’ interdependency.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, validation, resources, Writing - original draft and writing—review and editing: Dina Neto, Iago Blanco, María Melendo-Viu, David Dobarro, Andrés Iñiguez Romo. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Elleuch N, Mrabet S, Ben Slama A, Jaziri H, Hammami A, Brahim A, et al. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Tunis Med. 2020;98(3):206-10.
- Møller S, Bernardi M. Interactions of the heart and the liver. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(36):2804-11. [CrossRef]
- Yoon KT, Liu H, Lee SS. Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22(9):45. [CrossRef]
- Kalluru R, Gadde S, Chikatimalla R, Dasaradhan T, Koneti J, Cherukuri SP. Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy: The Interplay Between Liver and Heart. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e27969. [CrossRef]
- Busk TM, Bendtsen F, Møller S. Hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis: diagnostic, pathophysiological, and therapeutic aspects. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10(10):1153-61. [CrossRef]
- Di Lullo L, Bellasi A, Barbera V, Russo D, Russo L, Di Iorio B, et al. Pathophysiology of the cardio-renal syndromes types 1-5: An update. Indian Heart J. 2017;69(2):255-65. [CrossRef]
- EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;69(2):406-60. [CrossRef]
- de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):959-74. [CrossRef]
Table 1.
|
|
Normal value |
Nt pro BNP (pg/mL) |
112500 |
[50-450] |
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) |
3.6 |
0.5-1-1 |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) |
10 |
12-16 |
Transthoracic echocardiography |
LVEF 30%; normal mitral prosthesis gradient; moderated reduced RVEF; severe tricuspid regurgitation; pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure 60 mmHg; fixed and dilated inferior vena cava; inverted flow of suprahepatic veins |
_____ |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).