1. Introduction
Acute exposure to hypoxia can induce pulmonary edema (PE) as can often be observed after rapid ascents to high altitude. High-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) is considered to be non-cardiogenic edema caused by elevated pulmonary capillary pressure resulting from hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) [
1,
2]. HPV mainly occurs in pulmonary resistance arterioles but has also been observed in venules [
3,
4,
5]. While pulmonary areas with high HPV have a reduced capillary perfusion, relative overperfusion and increased capillary pressure occur in lung areas with mild HPV. Pathogenesis of HAPE is related to an uneven distribution of HPV [
6]. If venous resistance in these areas is elevated, water accumulation in the lung and fluid filtration into pulmonary interstitium may ensue [
7]. Chest radiographs or computerized tomography scans in HAPE patients show a patchy distribution of edema, which is in accordance with the assumption of a regionally heterogenous pulmonary perfusion in hypoxia [
1]. Moreover, subjects who are prone to develop HAPE, often show enhanced HPV accompanied by an excessive rise in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), which may aggravate fluid extravasation [
8,
9]. In less severe cases, HAPE is confined to the pulmonary interstitium. However, excessive increase in capillary pressure may cause ultrastructural damage to the alveolo-capillary walls resulting in a high-permeability form of edema – a mechanism referred to as capillary stress failure [
10,
11]. The increase in pulmonary capillary pressure and hence, formation of PE can be promoted by cardiac dysfunction such as an imbalance in the pumping function of the left and right ventricles. Previous rat studies showed that hypoxia decreased systolic pressure and contractility of the left ventricle (LV), while the inotropic function of the right ventricle (RV) was not compromised [
12]. This resulted in a mismatch between LV and RV that increased the backlog into pulmonary circulation and the severity of PE [
13].
The precise mechanisms of HPV are not completely understood. Reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) is considered to provide an important component to vasoconstriction [
14,
15,
16]. In addition to its vasodilator properties, NO is also a potent scavenger of oxidizing radicals generated by peroxynitrite [
17]. Low NO levels have been suggested to result from continual consumption by interaction between NO and the superoxide anion resulting in increased peroxynitrite formation [
18,
19]. Peroxynitrite radicals can induce DNA damage and apoptosis and are indicated by elevated levels of nitrotyrosine, an important marker of nitrosative stress [
20]. Numerous studies on animals and humans indicated a close relationship between generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and hypoxia-induced pulmonary inflammation and edema [
21,
22,
23,
24,
25].
Hypoxia-induced PE is typically accompanied by inflammatory reactions in the lung [
26,
27]. This was confirmed in previous studies on rats in normobaric hypoxia. PE emerged after 6 h of hypoxia and deteriorated with prolonged exposure to hypoxia over 24 h [
12]. It was accompanied by inflammation as demonstrated by increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α [
13,
28]. The inflammation, however, is considered to be rather a consequence than a cause of PE, but may maintain and aggravate edema formation [
29].
In addition, hypoxia induces activation of the sympathetic nervous system [
30,
31,
32]. Increased sympathetic activation, mainly mediated via α-adrenergic efferent pathways, is considered to play an important role in pulmonary vasoconstriction [
33]. However, strong sympathetic activation may induce PE even in normoxic conditions. In human pathology, neurogenic PE or PE as a complication of pheochromocytoma are well-known examples of catecholamine-induced PE [
34,
35,
36,
37]. In rats infused with norepinephrine (NE) or other adrenergic agonists, we observed development of moderate interstitial edema after 6-8 h of infusion, which was accompanied by histological signs of inflammation in the lungs and increased concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in serum and pleural fluid. The edema became more severe by 24 h and also affected the alveoli. While treatment with the α-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine aggravated both edema and inflammation, infusion of the β-agonist isoproterenol attenuated and decelerated the formation of edema [
38]. Under prolonged infusion of adrenergic agonists, regression of edema and inflammation was observed after 72 h, but we found elevated mRNA expression of collagens type I and III as well as histological signs of beginning fibrosis and mild vascular hypertrophy in the lungs [
39]. We therefore hypothesized that adrenergic blockade (AB) might attenuate hypoxia-induced pulmonary injury including both edema and inflammation and that these beneficial effects would be strongest with α-AB.
The present study was performed to investigate whether hypoxia-induced pulmonary edema and inflammation are still present after 72 h of hypoxia. Similarly, hemodynamic function was examined for hypoxia-induced disturbances in order to assess their role in formation of hypoxic PE. In addition, we compared the effects on pulmonary edema and inflammation of AB in normoxia and hypoxia. Finally, we investigated whether nitrosative stress as indicated by increased levels of nitrotyrosine (NT) can be demonstrated in the lungs after 72 h of normobaric hypoxia.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal model
All experiments were performed on 86 female Sprague–Dawley rats supplied by Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany). The body weight was 236 ± 1.3 g at the beginning of the study corresponding to an age of about 10-12 weeks. All animal protocols were approved by the Federal State Agency (Landesdirektion Sachsen, protocol number TVV 46/18). The experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health and with the “European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes” (Council of Europe No 123, Strasbourg 1985).
2.2. Study protocol
Animals were subdivided into two cohorts to be exposed to normoxia (N) or normobaric hypoxia (H) for 72 hours. For exposure to hypoxia, the animals were placed into a hypoxic chamber sized 65 × 105 × 50 cm. The gas mixture in the chamber contained 10% oxygen in nitrogen. A special equipment prevented penetration of ambient air during manipulations on the animals to keep the oxygen concentration in the chamber stable at 10 ± 0.5%. Normoxic animals remained under room air condition. Additionally, all animals received an intravenous infusion over the total experimental time. The normoxic and hypoxic cohorts were subdivided into 4 groups each. From both cohorts, one group was infused with 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution (N-NaCl, n = 12; H-NaCl, n = 16). The remaining groups (one group each from the normoxic and hypoxic cohort) were infused with the α-adrenergic blocker prazosin (PZ, 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1; N-PZ, n = 8; H-PZ, n = 12), the β-adrenergic blocker propranolol (PR, 0.16 mg kg-1 h-1; N-PR, n = 8; H-PR, n = 12) or a combination of the two (PZ+PR, 0.1 + 0.16 mg kg-1 h-1, respectively; N-PZ+PR, n = 8; H-PZ+PR, n = 10).
Infusions were administered with automatic pumps (Infors AG, Basel, Switzerland) at a rate of 0.1 ml h−1 via an infusion catheter (Vygon, Aachen, Germany). The infusion catheter was inserted into the left jugular vein. This operation was performed in 2% isofluran anesthesia. After catheter insertion, the animals woke up and moved freely with access to tap water and rat chow diet (Altromin C100, Altromin GmbH, Lage, Germany). Exposure to hypoxic environment started immediately after catheter insertion.
2.3. Hemodynamic measurements
About 30–40 min before the end of the exposure time, the animals were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of thiopental (Trapanal® 80 mg kg
−1). They were tracheotomized, and a polyethylene cannula was placed in the trachea. The RV was catheterized with a Millar® (Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) ultraminiature catheter pressure transducer (for more details see our previous publication [
40]). For catheterization of the LV, we used a pressure-volume catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, TX). Data acquisition and analysis was performed with the Power Lab and Lab Chart Software from ADInstruments (sales department FMI Föhr Medical Instruments GmbH, Seeheim, Germany). Parallel conductance was corrected by injection of isotonic saline solution (0.1 ml, 0.9% NaCl). In both ventricles, we determined systolic peak pressures in the left and right ventricles (LVSP, RVSP), maximal velocities of increase (dP/dtmax) and decrease in pressure (dP/dtmin) as measures of ventricular contractility and relaxation, respectively, and heart rate (HR). In addition, end-diastolic pressure (LV edP) and stroke volume (SV) were measured in the LV. SV was calibrated by the thermodilution method (for more details see [
41]). After withdrawal of the LV catheter tip into the aorta, diastolic aortic pressure (DAP) was measured to calculate mean aortic pressure (MAP). Cardiac index (CI, body mass-related cardiac output) was determined by thermodilution using a thermosensitive 1.5F microprobe and a Cardiomax II computer (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). The total peripheral resistance (TPR) was calculated by dividing MAP by CI. Hypoxic animals remained in hypoxia until completion of hemodynamic measurements.
2.4. Sampling of materials
After completion of the hemodynamic measurements, the abdominal cavity was opened by midline incision. Animals were sacrificed by drawing blood from the abdominal aorta. Then, we opened the thoracic wall and collected pleural fluid. After ligation of the right main bronchus, a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of the left lung was performed two times consecutively with 3 ml 0.9% NaCl each. The fluid was instilled via the tracheal cannula into the left lung and withdrawn immediately. The recovery rate was about 90% on average. The recovered BAL fluid was frozen and stored at − 80 °C for BAL cytology and other analyses. The left lung was discarded thereafter. From the intact right lung, tissue samples were fixated in formalin for histological analysis. A piece of the middle lobe was taken for determination of wet-to-dry weight (W/D) ratio.
2.5. Lung histology
The formalin-fixated tissue samples of the right lung were embedded in paraffin, sliced, and stained with hematoxylin–eosin. Histological assessments were done by two independent investigators (I.R. and J.K.), who were blinded towards the treatment group. In the lung, they evaluated PE and congestion. For a detailed quantification of PE, the complete histological section of a lung was assessed. First, PE severity (expressed as PE score) in each area of the section was gauged visually by evaluating the width of alveolar septa and the definition of alveolar spaces. PE scores ranged from 0 (absent), 1 (mild: alveolar septa slightly thickened, alveolar space well defined), 2 (moderate: thickness of alveolar septa about double the normal width, alveolar space narrowed but still defined), to 3 (severe: alveolar spaces hardly determinable and/or alveolar edema). The PE index (PEI) was calculated by cumulating the products of PE score and proportionate area of each part of the histological preparation. The congestion index (ConI) was determined in analogous way.
2.6. Immunohistochemistry
The expressions of TNFα, a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine, and NT in the lung were determined using immunohistochemistry. Specimens from the right lung, fixed with 4% formalin, were embedded in paraffin, and 2 μm slices were cut. After mounting on microscopic slides, the samples were dewaxed and rehydrated. For determination of TNFα, the specimens were cooked in 0.01M citrate buffer (pH=6) and then blocked with bovine serum albumin (BSA) to saturate unspecific bindings. Antigen retrieval was performed according to [
42]. Specimens were treated with rabbit monoclonal anti-TNFα primary antibody (1:100, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) over night at 4°C. Next, specimens were washed again in phosphate buffer and the appropriate goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:200, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) labelled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was applied for 2 hours. After a further washing step, peroxidase reaction was carried out using the red chromogen 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC, Dako, Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer ’s instruction. Cell nuclei were counterstained with haemalum.
For detection of NT, the dewaxed and rehydrated specimens were cooked in 0.01M citrate buffer (pH=6). After blockade with BSA to saturate unspecific bindings, the specimens were treated with mouse monoclonal anti-nitrotyrosine primary antibody (1:100, Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) over night at 4°C. Thereafter, the specimens were washed and the appropriate HRP-labelled secondary goat anti-mouse antibody (1:200, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was applied for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the specimens were washed again, and visualization of positive cells was performed with AEC red chromogen (Dako, Hamburg Germany). Cell nuclei were counterstained with haemalum. The specimens were investigated microscopically using the Axioimager M1 microscope from Zeiss (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). For determination of TNFα, which is mainly located in the bronchial and peribronchial regions, photographs were taken from these regions using the AxioCam MRc 5 camera and the AxioVision Rel. 4.6 software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at 5 × magnification. At least 10 pictures per animal were evaluated by a blinded observer (I.R.). For measurements in the pictures, the program ImageJ [
43] was used. As TNFα is located within the cytosol, we determined the TNFα-positive area (given in μm
2). The expression of TNFα is given as TNFα-positive area related to the total lung area of the specimen (in per cent). For NT determination, the procedure was similar, but photographs were taken at 20 x magnification. From each animal, at least 50 photographs were evaluated to measure the total area of the specimen and the percentage of NT-positive area.
2.7. Lung wet to dry weight ratio
Lung tissue samples were weighed immediately after preparation (wet weight, W) and after drying in an oven at 75 °C for 48 h (dry weight, D). The W/D ratio served as a surrogate parameter of water accumulation in the lung.
2.8. BAL cytology
BAL fluid was centrifuged for 20 min at 1500 rpm in a cytocentrifuge. The cytologic preparation was stained with hematoxylin-eosin and evaluated by a pathologist (J.K.) who was not aware of the treatment of the animal. The number of macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and eosinophils were given in per cent of the total cell number.
2.9. Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out with the software package SigmaPlot Version 14.0 (Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany) for Windows. All groups were statistically compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures. At first, we performed a Shapiro–Wilk test of normality. If data were normally distributed, we used a one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test according to Fisher’s method of least significant differences (LSD). If the data were not normally distributed, a Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on ranks with a post-hoc test according to Dunn’s method was applied. Both post hoc tests are multiple comparison procedures comparing all possible pairwise mean differences. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
4. Discussion
Our results showed that edema in the rat lung was still present after 72 h of exposure to normobaric hypoxia. The severity of PE was in a similar range or even slightly greater than observed in a previous study after 24 h of hypoxia [
12]. This indicates that the processes involved in edema formation are still active and promote the progression of pulmonary injury. Uneven HPV associated with elevated pulmonary capillary pressure are considered to be the main cause of hypoxic PE such as HAPE [
1,
6]. Of note, a specific effect of barometric pressure within the body is highly improbable, and the main causative factor for hypoxia-induced PE is not a reduction in barometric pressure but a reduction in inspiratory pO
2 [
45] suggesting that pathogenesis of PE is comparable in normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia. Pulmonary vasoconstriction induces blood congestion in the pulmonary circulation as was also demonstrated in the hypoxic animals of the present study. An elevated end-diastolic pressure in the LV of hypoxic rats confirmed our assumption of a backlog from the LV into pulmonary circulation. Moreover, hypoxia affected the hemodynamics of the LV and RV in a differential manner, thus inducing a mismatch in the inotropic function of the LV and RV that aggravated pulmonary congestion. While LV systolic pressure and contractility were significantly reduced under hypoxic conditions, RV systolic pressure and contractility were maintained or even slightly improved.
Noteworthy, in contrast to our hypothesis, PE was not significantly attenuated by AB. And more, AB even aggravated PE under normoxic conditions. Hemodynamic results showed that AB, in particular with β-blockers, also compromised cardiac inotropic and lusitropic functions in normoxia. In general, the LV was more severely affected than the RV. As to be expected, β-AB (alone or in combination with the α-blocker PZ) exerted the most pronounced effects, particularly on LV contractility and relaxation. Isolated α-AB had weaker effects on LV function, but reduced TPR indicating a vasodilatory effect. Vasodilation in the pulmonary vasculature in combination with a reduced LV relaxation and slightly elevated LV edP suggest increased congestion in the pulmonary vascular bed [
28]. These alterations of cardiovascular functions by adrenergic blockers and the resulting backlog into the lungs may explain the aggravation of PE.
In hypoxia, adrenergic blockers further deteriorated hypoxia-induced LV depression. Again, the depression was more pronounced with β-adrenergic blockers and predominantly concerned the LV. As a consequence, stroke volume decreased and LV edP increased compared to hypoxic animals with maintained adrenergic effects. The highest LV edP values were found in the H-PZ+PR group, and congestion index also reached its highest values in this group. These results confirm our suggestion that AB has reinforced the backlog into pulmonary circulation. This effect is even stronger in hypoxia than in normoxia and prevented the regression of edema.
Hypoxic PE is accompanied by inflammation in the lungs [
26,
27,
46]. It is widely accepted that hypoxia-induced PE is not induced by inflammatory processes, but is maintained and aggravated by inflammation [
29]. In rats, both acute and chronic hypobaric hypoxia induced pulmonary inflammation associated with a substantial increase in the serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα [
47,
48]. TNFα is a potent stimulator of inflammatory responses in many pulmonary diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) but also HAPE and high-altitude pulmonary hypertension (HAPH) [
49,
50]. In previous studies, we also found increased levels of TNFα in the lungs of rats exposed to normobaric hypoxia with an oxygen content of 10% over time intervals between 6 and 24 h [
13,
28]. The present results show that TNFα is still highly expressed after 72 h of hypoxia suggesting that inflammatory processes are still active and can maintain edema formation. Catecholamines are potent inflammatory activators of macrophages, upregulating production of cytokines such as TNFα via the NFκB pathway [
51]. Proinflammatory effects of catecholamines or sympathetic activation are predominantly mediated by α-adrenergic stimulation while stimulation of β-adrenoceptors mainly induces anti-inflammatory effects [
38,
52]. However, β-adrenergic stimulation can also induce inflammation under certain conditions [
53,
54]. Previous studies on rats demonstrated that experimental infusion of NE and other adrenergic agonists induced pulmonary inflammation and upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines in serum and lung tissue [
55,
56]. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system under hypoxic conditions can make an important contribution to hypoxia-induced pulmonary inflammation. This was confirmed by our results demonstrating that sympathetic blockade, particularly α-AB with prazosin, significantly reduced TNFα levels in the lungs of hypoxic rats (see
Figure 3).
Besides pulmonary edema and inflammation, hypoxia increases the generation of free radicals thus inducing oxidative/nitrosative stress. A study on rats revealed a significant increase in vascular leakage, in proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNFα, in the expression of NFkB and in reactive oxygen species in the lungs of rats exposed for up to 24 h to hypobaric hypoxia at 280 mmHg [
22]. Moreover, animal studies demonstrated that hypoxia induced NO-synthase (NOS) isoforms in various organs, resulting in an increased production of peroxynitrite [
20,
57,
58]. Peroxynitrite radicals induce nitrosylation of tyrosine residues, thus generating nitrotyrosines, which further can induce cell death.
Enhanced nitrosative stress, increased levels of TNFα and sympathetic stimulation are closely interrelated. TNFα is known to induce free radical generation and induction of oxidative/nitrosative stress [
49,
59] as could be demonstrated in various tissues including the lung [
60,
61,
62]. From human pathology such as the Takotsubo syndrome, it is known that an excessive release of catecholamines can induce both inflammation and nitrosative stress [
63]. Rat studies demonstrated that administration of adrenergic agonists increased both inflammation and nitrosative stress while AB attenuated it [
64,
65]. This is in accordance with our results demonstrating that reduction of TNFα levels in the lung by AB reduced in parallel also NT levels in pulmonary tissue. The results clearly show that hypoxic sympathetic activation makes a considerable contribution to hypoxia-induced lung injury.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.S. and B.R.; methodology, I.R., A.H., J.K., C.R., A.S. and B.R.; formal analysis, I.R., A.H., J.K., C.R., A.S. and B.R.; investigation, I.R., A.H., J.K., C.R., B.R. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.R., I.R., A.S.; writing—review and editing, B.R., C.R., A.S.; visualization, B.R., I.R.; supervision, A.S. and B.R. All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Pulmonary injury. (a-d) representative histological lung images (5 x magnification): (a) N-NaCl: largely unaffected lung with only mild edema and congestion; (b) H-NaCl: moderate to severe edema and inflammation, moderate congestion; (c) N-PZ+PR: mild to moderate edema and congestion, mild inflammation; (d) H-PZ+PR: moderate to severe edema and congestion, moderate inflammation. Pulmonary edema is marked by black arrows; inflammation is marked by white arrows; blood congestion is marked by arrowheads. (e, f) Pulmonary edema index of cohorts (e) and groups (f): N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: ― significant difference between marked columns, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; ° significant difference to corresponding control (NaCl) group, P < 0.05.
Figure 1.
Pulmonary injury. (a-d) representative histological lung images (5 x magnification): (a) N-NaCl: largely unaffected lung with only mild edema and congestion; (b) H-NaCl: moderate to severe edema and inflammation, moderate congestion; (c) N-PZ+PR: mild to moderate edema and congestion, mild inflammation; (d) H-PZ+PR: moderate to severe edema and congestion, moderate inflammation. Pulmonary edema is marked by black arrows; inflammation is marked by white arrows; blood congestion is marked by arrowheads. (e, f) Pulmonary edema index of cohorts (e) and groups (f): N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: ― significant difference between marked columns, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; ° significant difference to corresponding control (NaCl) group, P < 0.05.
Figure 2.
Lung congestion index of cohorts (a) and groups (b): N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: (*) The difference between the normoxic and hypoxic cohorts is near to significance (P = 0.05).
Figure 2.
Lung congestion index of cohorts (a) and groups (b): N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: (*) The difference between the normoxic and hypoxic cohorts is near to significance (P = 0.05).
Figure 3.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α in the lung. (a-d) representative immunohistochemical images from N-NaCl (a), H-NaCl (b), N-PZ+PR (c) and H-PZ+PR (d), all slices 5 x magnification; red staining indicates TNFα-positive cells (examples are marked by arrows). (e, f) Abundance of TNFα of cohorts (e) and groups (f) expressed as percentage of positive area related to the total lung area: N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: ― significant difference between marked columns, *** P < 0.001; °°° significant difference to corresponding control (NaCl) group, P < 0.001.
Figure 3.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α in the lung. (a-d) representative immunohistochemical images from N-NaCl (a), H-NaCl (b), N-PZ+PR (c) and H-PZ+PR (d), all slices 5 x magnification; red staining indicates TNFα-positive cells (examples are marked by arrows). (e, f) Abundance of TNFα of cohorts (e) and groups (f) expressed as percentage of positive area related to the total lung area: N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: ― significant difference between marked columns, *** P < 0.001; °°° significant difference to corresponding control (NaCl) group, P < 0.001.
Figure 4.
Nitrotyrosine (NT) in the lung. (a-d) representative immunohistochemical images from N-NaCl (a), H-NaCl (b), N-PZ+PR (c) and H-PZ+PR (d), all slices 20 x magnification; red staining indicates NT-positive cells (examples are marked by arrows). (e, f) Abundance of NT of cohorts (e) and groups (f) expressed as percentage of positive area related to the total lung area: N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: ― significant difference between marked columns, *** P < 0.001; ° significant difference to corresponding control (NaCl) group, P < 0.05, °° P < 0.01, P < 0.001.
Figure 4.
Nitrotyrosine (NT) in the lung. (a-d) representative immunohistochemical images from N-NaCl (a), H-NaCl (b), N-PZ+PR (c) and H-PZ+PR (d), all slices 20 x magnification; red staining indicates NT-positive cells (examples are marked by arrows). (e, f) Abundance of NT of cohorts (e) and groups (f) expressed as percentage of positive area related to the total lung area: N normoxia, H hypoxia, PZ prazosin, PR propranolol. Significance marks: ― significant difference between marked columns, *** P < 0.001; ° significant difference to corresponding control (NaCl) group, P < 0.05, °° P < 0.01, P < 0.001.
Table 1.
Hemodynamic results.
Table 1.
Hemodynamic results.
Cohort |
Normoxic cohort: |
Hypoxic cohort: |
Group |
N-NaCl |
N-PZ |
N-PR |
N-PZ+PR |
H-NaCl |
H-PZ |
H-PR |
H-PZ+PR |
LVSP [mmHg] |
106.9± 3.7
|
99.4± 2.4
|
123.3 ± 3.4 |
99.9 ± 5.5 °° |
102.2 ± 11.9 ° |
92.5 ± 5.2 °°° |
103.5 ± 3.8 ** |
96.8 ± 4.4 |
95.5 ± 6.3 |
101.3 ± 5.5 |
LV dP/dtmax [mmHg/s] |
8748± 494
|
7142 ± 364 ** |
10419 ± 622 |
9912 ± 933 |
6943 ± 1029°° |
6804 ± 908°° |
8365 ±569* |
7798 ± 755 |
5838 ± 551°° |
5893 ± 858° |
LV dP/dtmin [mmHg/s] |
-9534± 541
|
-8437± 413
|
-11896 ± 468 |
-9328 ± 1170° |
-8433 ± 1307 °° |
-7136 ± 927°°° |
-10176 ± 614 |
-9178 ± 801 |
-6957 ± 689°° |
-6439 ± 788 °°° |
Stroke volume [μl] |
194.7± 6.9
|
165.5 ± 6.5 ** |
215.3 ± 7.2 |
211.7 ± 6.8 |
167.4 ± 18.8 ° |
172.4 ± 13.2 ° |
185.6 ± 11.6 * |
152.9 ± 8.8 ° ** |
143.5 ± 18.5 ° |
164.8 ± 12.3 |
LV edP [mmHg] |
5.74± 0.34
|
6.97 ± 0.25 *** |
5.93 ± 0.54 |
6.50 ± 1.13 |
5.04 ± 0.54 |
5.52 ± 0.67 |
6.38 ± 0.35 |
7.06 ± 0.48 |
7.10 ± 0.34 |
7.69 ± 0.86 |
RVSP [mmHg] |
27.9± 0.7
|
30.8 ± 0.9 * |
30.9 ± 0.9 |
26.8 ± 1.1 |
27.7 ± 1.6 |
24.7 ± 1.0 ° |
34.3 ± 1.5 |
29.6 ± 1.9 |
28.3 ± 0.8 |
29.1 ± 2.6 |
RV dP/dtmax [mmHg/s] |
2201± 138
|
2096± 119
|
2307 ± 183 |
2466 ± 280 |
2542 ± 444 |
1511 ± 66 |
2458 ± 192 |
2350 ± 247 |
1638 ± 99 |
1646 ± 309 ° |
RV dP/dtmin [mmHg/s] |
-1777± 114
|
-1692± 81
|
-2098 ± 174 |
-1815 ± 214 |
-1503 ± 129 |
-1503 ± 315 |
-1928 ± 137 |
-1824 ± 181 |
-1377 ± 80 |
-1469 ± 191 |
Heart rate [min-1] |
426.0± 7.7
|
390.0 ± 6.2 *** |
441.8 ± 8.1 |
458.1 ± 11.2 |
423.9 ± 9.3 |
374.5 ± 21.1°°° |
410.4 ± 8.3* |
407.4 ± 11.1 |
359.6 ± 11.9*** °°° |
367.7 ± 13.9°° |
Cardiac index [ml min-1 kg-1] |
337.4± 14.5
|
264.8 ± 9.6 *** |
387.4 ± 11.8 |
360.2 ± 38.6 |
302.3 ± 27.7 °° |
276.5 ± 25.9 °°° |
312.7 ± 15.6 ** |
258.7 ± 12.9 *** ° |
243.4 ± 18.0 °° |
245.0 ± 14.7 °° |
MAP [mmHg] |
96.4± 3.5
|
91.0± 2.4
|
109.6 ± 3.5 |
91.0 ± 5.7 |
92.7 ± 11.6 |
84.7 ± 5.0 |
91.4 ± 3.6 |
91.2 ± 4.8 |
87.1 ± 5.9 |
95.2 ± 5.7 |
TPR [mmHg ° min ° kg ° s-1] |
0.30± 0.01
|
0.38 ± 0.03 * |
0.29 ± 0.01 |
0.26 ± 0.02 |
0.33 ± 0.07 |
0.31 ± 0.03 |
0.30 ± 0.02 |
0.35 ± 0.03 |
0.42 ± 0.08 |
0.40 ± 0.04 |
Table 2.
Lung wet-to-dry weight (W/D) ratio and pleural fluid volume.
Table 2.
Lung wet-to-dry weight (W/D) ratio and pleural fluid volume.
Cohort |
Normoxic cohort: |
Hypoxic cohort: |
Group |
N-NaCl |
N-PZ |
N-PR |
N-PZ+PR |
H-NaCl |
H-PZ |
H-PR |
H-PZ+PR |
W/D ratio [%] |
4.82 (4.73; 4.96) |
5.03 (4.83; 5.42) ** |
4.96 (4.80; 5.59) |
4.77 (4.68; 4.82) |
4.85 (4.66; 4.98) |
4.79 (4.68; 4.92) |
4.99 (4.82; 5.44) |
5.01 (4.97; 5.16) |
5.43 4.94; 5.74) |
4.93 (4.73; 5.14) |
Pleural fluid volume [mL] |
0.18 (0.10; 1.68) |
0.20 (0.10; 1.23) |
0.10 (0.05; 0.16) |
1.90 (0.13; 5.25) |
0.35 (0.08; 1.68) |
0.63 (0.16; 3.68) |
0.13 (0.04; 0.55) |
0.20 (0.08; 2.10) |
0.20 (0.10; 0.80) |
0.23 (0.10; 0.13) |