3.1.1. Plant height and lateral branch number at chickpea flowering stage
The results of the field experiment showed that in all surveyed regions, the highest height of chickpea cultivars was related to the fields where there was no history of using tribenuron-methyl during the last two years. In general, the average height of the plant in the Meskinabad region was lower than all regions (28 cm), but in the two regions of Khorramabad and Moradabad, where the plant height was almost equal, the plant height was higher than Meskinabad (
Table 2).
In Khorramabad, in farms with a history of using herbicide once or twice, the height of the Bivanij variety decreased by 5% compared to farms without a history of using tribenuron-methyl while this number was 19% in Moradabad. In Meskinabad, the height of the Bivanij variety in fields treat with herbicide once and two times decreased by 6% and 25.71%, respectively. In general, the negative impact of herbicide residues in Meskinabad was higher on the height of Bivanij when compared with other regions (
Table 2).
In Meskinabad, fields having one or two times of herbicide usage history, the height of Adel variety decreased by 8% compared to fields without the history of herbicide use. In Moradabad, the height of Adel variety in fields treated once and two times with herbicide decreased by 11 and 18%, respectively (
Table 2).
The height of Mansour cultivar in Khorramabad in fields with one year history of herbicide use was not different from fields without herbicide application, while in fields with two years history of herbicide use, the height of this variety decreased by 22.12% compared to the control. The same trend was observed in two other two regions, Meskinabad and Moradabad, with the difference that the extend of height reduction in farms with two years of herbicide use was 7% and 10.94%, respectively (
Table 2).
The number of lateral branches at the flowering stage in Bivanij and Mansour cultivars in all three regions and herbicide treatments was not significantly different from each other (
Table 2). For Adel cultivar growing in fields treated one and two years by tribenuron-methyl in Khorramabad, the number of lateral branches decreased by 10 and 30, respectively (
Table 2).
3.1.2. Final chickpea hright and grain yield
The results showed that the height of all cultivars in Khorramabad region was on average lower than the other two regions, Meskinabad and Moradabad (
Table 2).
In general, in all the three studied regions, the highest plant height belonged to the fields without a history of tribenuron-methyl treatment, the exception was in Meskinabad, where one year of herbicide usage did not differ from non-treated fields (
Table 3)
In Khorramabad, one and two year of using the herbicide decreased the final height of Adel cultivar by 10.11% and 12.35%, respectively, compared to the control or fields with no history of herbicide usage. These values were insignificant in Meskinabad (about 2%) and in Moradabad, these numbers were 4% and 7%, respectively. These results indicate the higher sensitivity of Adel cultivar in Meskinabad to tribenuron-methyl residues (
Table 3). Bivanij cultivar lost about 8% of its final height in fields treated once or three times with herbicide use compared to fields without history of herbicide use in both Khorramabad and Meskinabad regions. This value was 14.6% in Moradabad (
Table 3).
In all three regions, Mansour variety in all the three regions studied in fields with a history of herbicide application twice did not differ from fields without herbicide contamination, but in fields with herbicide application history of two years in the two mentioned regions, the final plant height decreased by 7% (
Table 3).
The seed yield of Adel variety in Khorramabad in fields received once and two times of herbicide in comparison with fields without any history of herbicide application decreased by 3% and 6%, respectively. In Meskinabad and Moradabad one year of herbicide usage did not cause a decrease in yield, but three times of herbicide use in the two mentioned areas caused a 7% and 3% reduction in seed yield, respectively (
Table 3).
In Meskinabad and Moradabad regions, one year of use of herbicide in fields devoted to Bivanij cultivar had no effect on its seed yield compared to no fields without herbicide residues. However, seed yield of fields with history of two times of tribenuron-methyl decreased by 7% and 31.81%, respectively. The seed yield of Bivanij variety in fields treated once and two times with herbicide decreased by 7% and 33.40%, respectively.
In the all three regions, the application of herbicide twice had a negligible effect on the seed yield of Mansour cultivar, but in the fields treat with herbicide two times yield reduction about 7% was observed (
Table 3).
3.1.3. Correlation between seed yield, number of lateral branch and height of chickpea varieties
The results of correlation analysis between seed yield, plant height and the number of lateral branches of all chickpea cultivars grown in fields with zero, two and three years of applying tribenuron-methyl in the three regions are shown in
Table 3. The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between the height of the plant and the seed yield of chickpea cultivars. With the increase in plant height, seed yield increased. On the other hand, there was a negative and significant relationship between the number of lateral branches and seed yield. In other words, the yield decreased with the increase in the number of lateral branches. The relationship between plant height and the number of lateral branches was also negative and significant. The increase in the number of lateral branches resulted in a decrease in the plant height (
Table 4).
In total, the results of the field experiment showed that Bivanij variety was more sensitive to the residues of tribenuron-methyl in the soil compared to the other two varieties, namely Mansour and Adel. For instance, in some areas there was more than 30% decrease in grain yield of Bivanij in fields heavily contaminated with herbicide residues. Mansoor and Adel cultivars were almost the same in terms of sensitivity to tribenuron-methyl residues.
On the average, there was no difference between not using the herbicide and applying herbicide for one year and the history of using the herbicide. However, all chickpea cultivars showed a decrease in growth and grain yield in fields treated with herbicide twice; so that the yield of chickpea in such farms showed four times more decrease in grain yield compared to the fields without herbicide history and those treated once.
In general, biodegradation (degradation by microorganisms), chemical degradation (hydrolysis and oxidation), photodegradation (degradation due to the effect of sunlight), uptake by susceptible plants, adsorption to soil particles and leaching are main factors driving herbicide degradation and its subsequent persistence in the soil [
15].
A wide range of edaphic factors such as pH, texture, organic matter content, moisture, and microorganisms affect the degradation and persistence of herbicides in soils [
16,
17]. It is well known that the most important pathways for sulfonylurea herbicides degradation in soil are microbial breakdown and chemical hydrolysis [
10]. So, it can be expected that greater degradation of such herbicides would be achieved in soils of higher water content than for dry soils. Most sulfonylureas are anion in soil with pH above 5–6 and therefore mobile in such soils [
18] while the acidity of soils of region of the study site is typically higher than 7 [
19]. Furthermore, degradation of herbicides in soils containing high organic matter content is accelerated because the population of soil microorganisms consuming herbicides as food is high [
20].
Despite the difference in some traits of different chickpea cultivars grown in all three studied regions, chickpea seed yield in different regions did not differ significantly. The physicochemical characteristics of the soil of all three regions are given in the
Table 1. Although regions had different soil characteristics, the effect of this difference on the carry over effect of tribenuron-methyl residues was not significant. This result is contrary to the results of other studies on the effect of soil physicochemical properties on herbicide residues.
Natural hydrolysis as the main pathways of tribenuron-methyl degradation. On the contrary, more and more researches have reported the microbial degradation of sulfonylurea herbicides [
17,
21,
22]. Since both pathways of decomposition of tribenuron-methyl residues are dependent on soil moisture, the conditions in the rainfed areas of western Iran are not suitable for the degradation of the residues of this herbicide. Although we did not determine the type of decomposition of tribenuron-methyl herbicide in this study
Mehdizadeh, Alebrahim and Roushani [
12] reported that 26% of applied tribenuron-methyl remained 10 days after application in the soil; however, they did not measure long time herbicide residual in soil. In a study conducted Chen [
23] usage of tribenuron-methyl on wheat resulted in substantial reduction of growth of corn the rotation
The greater degradation rate of tribenuron methyl in comparison with sulfosulfuron has been reported [
12]. No phytotoxic effect of another member of sulfonylurea chemical family herbicides, sulfosulfuron, on bottle gourd at nearly four months after application was observed [
6]. Likewise, lentil (a predominant legume in the region of our study) was tolerant to tribenuron methyl residues 8 months after herbicide application [
24]. Similar to our results, Serim and Maden [
25] reported the carry over effects of sulfosulfuron residues on sunflower one year after application.
Nine months after application the carry over effect of sulfosulfuron, another sulfonylurea, on barley and common vetch was not observed while sulfosulfuron residues did not affect the shoot and root length and root dry weight of sunflower [
26]. Tribenuron-methyl has an acceptable controlling level on broad leaf weeds, which means it has a potential to damage broad leaf crops, such as chickpea, lentil, sugar beet and oilseed rape [
27].
The results of field trials indicated that trace residue concentrations below our detection limit may have remained in the soil even in a long period of times after application of these herbicides and accumulated in the soil environment and affected sensitive crops as well as soil microorganisms.