3.1. Comparing SRFT and Chebyshev Filter-Based Solutions
Among filter types, the Chebyshev filter is known to offer the lowest maximum reflection coefficient within the prescribed filter bandwidth. Considering the challenge of achieving a reflection coefficient below −10 dB in the UWB applications, the Chebyshev filter theory is deemed more suitable for meeting this criterion. In [
9], a UWB Chebyshev filter theory is used to design the IMN for a load modelled by a 50 Ω resistor in series with a 650 fF capacitor. The IMN comprises five components, with their values in [
9] and depicted in
Figure 2. The reflection coefficient resulting from this design is illustrated in
Figure 4, obtained by simulating the circuit in
Figure 2 using the Cadence Virtuoso Spectre circuit simulator with ideal elements from the analog library.
On the other hand, when designing a UWB IMN using SRFT, optimization methods play a significant role in obtaining a solution with better performance. Most reported RFT and SRFT techniques use Levenberg-Marquart optimization [
15,
17,
23]. The Levenberg-Marquardt optimization is a local optimization algorithm that aims to find the minimum of a function in the vicinity of an initial guess. Thus, it is best suited for problems where a solution is expected to be found in the proximity of the initial guess [
24]. Selecting a good initial guess in such a highly nonlinear optimization process is critical, and it substantially impacts the ability to reach the optimal IMN [
15,
22,
25].
To see if we can obtain a better solution than the Chebyshev filter approach, we applied the SRFT to the same load as in [
9]. It is observed that the SRFT may yield solutions that can not be synthesized by LC elements, even if they demonstrate superior matching performance. We characterize them as infeasible solutions. One such solution is shown by the red line in
Figure 4. However, after an exhausting search with various initial guesses and using the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization method, a solution with a maximum reflection coefficient of −12.38 dB in the whole UWB spectrum was found, as shown by the green-line curve in
Figure 4. This solution is slightly better than the solution obtained using the Chebyshev filter theory, which features a maximum reflection coefficient of −12.3 dB. However, the solution obtained using the SRFT requires only four elements, as demonstrated in
Figure 3, as opposed to the five elements required by the Chebyshev design. This is beneficial, particularly in this example, saving space since an inductor is eliminated.
Figure 2.
UWB IMN based on Chebyshev filter theory in [
9].
Figure 2.
UWB IMN based on Chebyshev filter theory in [
9].
Figure 3.
UWB IMN based on SRFT.
Figure 3.
UWB IMN based on SRFT.
As an alternative, one may consider utilizing global optimization techniques. These methods can offer the lowest possible reflection coefficient at the expense of significantly longer computations. RFT-based techniques predominantly employ local minimum optimization methods, yielding a solution quickly. As exemplified above, SRFT may result in an infeasible solution, in which case another search must be initiated. With a global optimization method, e.g., the genetic algorithm (GA), the algorithm may bypass a feasible solution and converge to an infeasible solution due to its inclination towards achieving the lowest minimax objective. Indeed, [
26] reports an approach using the GA; however, impractical responses are sometimes obtained.
It is clear that synthesizing a feasible solution for a UWB IMN (topology and component values) is problematic. While the optimization may indicate the existence of a solution, it may be difficult or even impossible to synthesize a practical network, particularly in scenarios involving intricate configurations and components like transformers. As shown in [
27], some preassumption is required to find the right synthesis.
Figure 4.
Reflection coefficient of Chebyshev filter, SRFT-based feasible solution and SRFT-based infeasible solution.
Figure 4.
Reflection coefficient of Chebyshev filter, SRFT-based feasible solution and SRFT-based infeasible solution.
3.2. IMN for Low-Power Applications
In any UWB receiver, the amplifier connected to the antenna should present an input impedance close to 50 Ω across the entire frequency band for a maximum power transfer. The inductor-degenerated topology is a commonly used technique [
28] for amplifiers using bipolar junction transistors (BJT) [
29] and field-effect transistors (FET) [
30].
Figure 5 shows the frequently used common emitter amplifier with a degeneration inductor
Le to obtain the required input resistance for narrowband [
29] and wideband matching [
10]. Here,
C1 serves as a DC blocking capacitor, and
L1 is an RF choke to isolate the biasing circuit from the RF port. We demonstrate the designs of the input matching networks based on SRFT for different bias conditions and circuit topologies using GlobalFoundries 90nm BiCMOS technology.
For low-power applications, the circuit's input reactance sets the lower power consumption limit. When we reduce the power consumption by decreasing the base-to-emitter voltage applied to the BJT, the base-emitter junction capacitor (
Cbe) becomes smaller, resulting in a smaller
Cin (or a bigger absolute value of input reactance) and making it more challenging to find an IMN solution at the input. As demonstrated by Bode [
31] and Fano [
3], there is a physical limitation on broadband impedance matching of a load. Matthaei
et al. expounded on the limitation and applied it to an input impedance
Zin modelled by a parallel RC network [
32]. The limitation indicates that, in order to attain a viable IMN solution within a defined bandwidth, a boundary exists on both the input
Zin, resistance and reactance components, and the minimum achievable reflection coefficient
. In this circuit, when
Cbe is smaller than the lower limit, we can no longer find a feasible IMN solution.
To examine the lowest power consumption for the inductive degeneration topology shown in
Figure 5 and ensure the circuit has sufficiently high cut-off frequency
fT to cover the 3.1 – 10.6 GHz band,
Figure 6 shows the equivalent
Cin at 3 GHz, the
fT of the transistor, and the
fT of the amplifier (with
Le in the range of 30 – 40 pH) at different collector currents
IC. The transistor used in the simulation has a length and width of 90 nm and 10 μm, respectively, and its collector is biased at 1.0 V. To ensure that we can obtain a feasible IMN solution, providing
below −10 dB over 3.1 – 10.6 GHz, we start with the collector current
IC = 32.8 mA, at which
Cin is about 650 fF, as suggested in [
9]. As expected, the reduction in the collector current decreases the equivalent input capacitance
Cin at 3 GHz due to the reduction of
Cbe. The lowest collector current for a feasible IMN solution is at
IC = 27.4 mA. Further reducing
Cin is restricted by the physical limitation mentioned by Bode [
31] and Fano [
3]. The
Rin of this circuit exhibits frequency-dependent variations due to the inherent characteristics of the BJT transistor in this technology. The intrinsic base resistance varies from approximately 50 Ω to 17 Ω across the frequency band of interest. The adjustment of this variation around 50 Ω with the assistance of
Le poses an additional challenge in the quest for an IMN compared to a circuit that provides a constant 50 Ω over the bandwidth. In addition, comparing the circuit's cut-off frequency (
fT) and the transistor's
fT at these bias points indicates that the emitter degeneration inductor
Le enhances the
fT of the circuit slightly and follows the
fT of the transistor.
To further reduce the power consumption,
Cin is to be established by adding a capacitor
Cp in parallel at the amplifier input, as shown in
Figure 7. Incorporating a
Cp mitigates variations in
Rin with respect to frequency as it places in parallel with the intrinsic impedance of the transistor. This arrangement brings
Rin into closer proximity to 50 Ω. When reducing the collector current
IC, we adhere to essential criteria: (1) ensuring the IMN remains below −10 dB across the bandwidth and (2) maintaining the circuit's
fT above 100 GHz to ensure having the bandwidth up to 10.6 GHz.
Cp and
Le were adjusted to address Rin and fT carefully to meet this requirement.
Figure 8 shows the equivalent
Cin at 3 GHz, the cut-off frequencies
fT of the transistor and the amplifier (with
Le in the range of 60 – 140 pH) at different collector currents
IC. It is observed that, although adding
Cp decreases the
fT of the amplifier, we can further reduce the collector current
IC to 6.1 mA, which is an 81.3% reduction from the initial
IC = 32.8 mA while maintaining the
fT at around 100 GHz. More decrease in collector current
IC would yield a circuit with a reduced
fT or a
surpassing −10 dB.
Table 1 shows the component values of the IMN,
Cp and
Le for the bias conditions of the base-to-emitter voltage
VBE and the collector current
IC in
Figure 8.